integration cost. integration cost in rps calculator while “integration cost” is included in nmv...

14
INTEGRATION COST

Upload: matthew-richardson

Post on 21-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

INTEGRATION COST

Integration Cost in RPS Calculator• While “Integration Cost” is included in

NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration Adder in LCBF is valued at $0/MWh

• Some parties have suggested that a non-zero “Integration Adder” is needed to compare fairly among renewables, but there is little consensus on how it should be calculated or what impacts it should include

• A non-zero “Integration Adder” suggests that other components of NMV do not capture the full costs and benefits of renewables upon the system

RPS Calculator Valuation Framework

Levelized Cost of Energy

Transmission Cost

Capacity Value

Energy Value

Net Resource Cost

Integration Cost*

=

+

++

*Not currently quantified in RPS Calculator

Defining “Renewable Integration”

• There is no standard definition of “renewable integration”

• Many factors could be included under the scope of the costs of integrating higher penetrations of renewables to the system:– Saturation effects – Addressed in Version 6.0

• Declining ELCC with penetration• Declining dispatch savings with penetration• Curtailment of renewable output due to renewable output shapes

– Flexibility effects – Proposed for Version 6.2• Costs of additional ancillary services needs• Costs of increased plant cycling and ramping• Curtailment of renewable output due to lack of power system flexibility• Cost of procuring new flexible capacity resources

SATURATION EFFECTS

Declining Capacity Value Saturation Effect: as the penetration of a resource grows, the “net peak” shifts away from

the time that it produces, reducing its marginal impact on reliability

Treatment in RPS Calculator: capacity value of new resources is calculated based on Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC), which accounts for the reliability impact of the existing portfolio

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Load

(GW

)

Hour

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 6 12 18

Peak

Loa

d Re

ducti

on (G

W)

Installed Solar PV Capacity (GW)

Declining Energy Value Saturation Effect: as the penetration of a resource grows, renewable generation will

displace conventional generation from increasingly efficient, low cost resources

Treatment in RPS Calculator: reduction in system operating costs for each increment of renewables calculated by comparing net load with a “stack” of gas generators

CAISO market prices increase

with the amount of load served by gas

generation & imports

Data Source: CAISO OASIS & Daily Renewables Watch, 2010-2013

Increasing Overgeneration Saturation Effect: as the penetration of a resource grows, curtailment of renewables occurs

when total must-run production exceeds load plus export capability. This could occur even if generators were highly flexible.

Treatment in RPS Calculator: marginal curtailment for each renewable resource type approximated by comparing net load in each month-hour with an assumed minimum level of thermal generation, assuming no ramping or start constraints.

33% RPS 40% RPS 50% RPS

Saturation Effects in RPS Calculator

• Version 6.0 accounts for the major impacts of saturation on resource value– Declining energy value, declining capacity value, overgeneration

• The marginal value of each resource type decreases as more is added to portfolio– Declining returns with scale encourages portfolio diversity

• Additional functionality to account for impacts such as flexibility needs is planned for Version 6.1.

Impact of Saturation on Value (33%)

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Solar

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Wind

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Baseload

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Solar

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Wind

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Baseload

Marginal Resource Cost at 0% RPS(shown as a reference)

Marginal Resource Cost at 33% RPS• 40% solar• 40% wind• 20% baseload

Figures are illustrative of

model functionality –

not an RPS Calculator result

Capacity and operational

values decline slightly at 33%

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Solar

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Wind

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Baseload

Impact of Saturation on Value (40%)

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Solar

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Wind

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Baseload

Marginal Resource Cost at 0% RPS(shown as a reference)

Marginal Resource Cost at 40% RPS• 40% solar• 40% wind• 20% baseload

Rate at which operational

value declines increases

Figures are illustrative of

model functionality –

not an RPS Calculator result

Need to curtail renewables

imposes additional cost

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Solar

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Wind

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Baseload

Impact of Saturation on Value (50%)

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Solar

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Wind

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

PPA Price CapacityValue

OperationalValue

CurtailmentCost

Net Cost

$/M

Wh

Baseload

Marginal Resource Cost at 0% RPS(shown as a reference)

Marginal Resource Cost at 50% RPS• 40% solar• 40% wind• 20% baseload

Figures are illustrative of

model functionality –

not an RPS Calculator result

Declines in operational

value continue

Costs of curtailment becomes

significant

FLEXIBILITY EFFECTS

Flexibility Effects in RPS Calculator

• Additional costs due to power system flexibility needs are proposed for Version 6.2 of the RPS Calculator– Costs of procuring additional ancillary services during system operations– Costs of increased plant cycling and ramping– Curtailment of renewable output due to lack of power system flexibility– Cost of procuring new flexible capacity resources

• These costs would be appropriate to include in an “integration adder”

Potential MethodologiesCost Category Potential Methodology

Costs of procuring additional ancillary services

• Statistical analysis of net load variation within operating hour to determine regulation and load following needs at various penetration levels

• Conventional production simulation analysis to estimate cost of procuring additional services

Costs of increased plant cycling and ramping

• Production simulation analysis to estimate cycling and ramping frequency at various penetration levels

• Literature review of effect on O&M costs & lifetime

Curtailment of renewable output due to lack of power system flexibility

• Stochastic production simulation analysis at various penetration levels to estimate the quantity of curtailment for a given fleet of dispatchable resources

Cost of procuring new flexible capacity resources

• Stochastic production simulation to evaluate cost-effectiveness of new flexible capacity resources relative to “default” curtailment solution