integrated uplands protocol progress

19
Jean Pan, Protocol Lead, MOJN I&M Ecologist Donovan Craig, UNLV Invasives Cooperator Dana Robinson, MOJN I&M GIS Specialist Debbie Soukup, UNLV Soils Cooperator Leigh Ann Starcevich, Statistics Cooperator Nita Tallent, MOJN I&M Program Manager Bob Truitt, MOJN I&M Data Manager Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress 03/27/201 2

Upload: donoma

Post on 10-Feb-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress. Jean Pan, Protocol Lead, MOJN I&M Ecologist Donovan Craig, UNLV Invasives Cooperator Dana Robinson, MOJN I&M GIS Specialist Debbie Soukup , UNLV Soils Cooperator Leigh Ann Starcevich , Statistics Cooperator Nita Tallent , MOJN I&M Program Manager - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Jean Pan, Protocol Lead, MOJN I&M EcologistDonovan Craig, UNLV Invasives CooperatorDana Robinson, MOJN I&M GIS SpecialistDebbie Soukup, UNLV Soils CooperatorLeigh Ann Starcevich, Statistics CooperatorNita Tallent, MOJN I&M Program ManagerBob Truitt, MOJN I&M Data Manager

Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

03/27/2012

Page 2: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

7 vital signsVegetation

◦Upland shrub communitiesSoilsInvasive species – Status & Trend

◦Invasive species that are established, NOT still in the establishing phase

◦Prioritized list of target species

Protocol Components

2

Page 3: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Protocol Development Field Implementation

PDS

Sampling Plan

Draft Narrative

Draft SOPs

Draft Submitted

Draft Re-Submitted

Protocol Approved

Methods Selected

Methods Field-Tested

Pilot Data Acquired

Full Field Season

Data in Database

Annual Report

Integrated Uplands Progress - 2011

Page 4: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Protocol Development Field Implementation

PDS

Sampling Plan

Draft Narrative

Draft SOPs

Draft Submitted

Draft Re-Submitted

Protocol Approved

Methods Selected

Methods Field-Tested

Pilot Data Acquired

Full Field Season

Data in Database

Annual Report

Integrated Uplands Progress - 2012

Page 5: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Park Community Spatial dataset from (year):

Elevation (in feet)

Acres

DEVA Creosote-mixed shrubland Central Mojave Vegetation Map (2004)

3000-5000 824,143

GRBA Sagebrush shrub steppe Provisional vegetation map (2011)

5300 – 11200* 3,305**

JOTR Joshua tree wooded alliance Vegetation map (2010)

3200 – 4500* 40,258**

LAKE Creosote-bursage Landfire (2006) 1500 – 5000 366,419

MANZ Rabbitbrush-saltbrush shrub transition zone

Vegetation map (2010)

3800 – 3900* 181**

MOJA Joshua tree wooded scrubland

Central Mojave Vegetation Map (2004)

2600 – 6300* 327,448

PARA Sagebrush shrub steppe AZ strip dataset (2007)

3600 - 7200 190,806

Selected Park Communities

5*The elevation range here represents the selected elevation range for which the shrub community was specifically selected.**Acreage estimate is after parcels smaller than a macroplot (1 ha) were eliminated from the spatial distribution.

Page 6: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

35 macroplots◦ Spatially-

balancedVegetationSoilsInvasives

◦ Quadrat◦ Patterned walk

Monitoring Design

6

9*

8*

7*

10*11*12*

1*

2*

3*

6*5*4*

Page 7: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

PWR external reviews received (3/28/12)◦Spring, 2012 - protocol reconciliation & approval

Data Management/GIS◦ Designed field forms, foundations of DB◦ Developing SQL database, electronic field data entry

system◦ Veg. layers compiled for inference populations

Protocol Status

7

Page 8: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Spring, 2012 - pilot implementationObjectives

◦ Accuracy of park vegetation maps Are the selected sites part of the target vegetation

community?◦ Logistics

Time to establish & measure macroplots Necessary field equipment

◦ Field methods Can the methods be implemented (e.g. will the

methods work at each park?) Are the SOPs clear? How can the methods be improved?

Field Status

8

Page 9: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

7 parks – 2 to 5 macroplotsField sites selected – GRTSResearch permits issued – 5 parksfield sites close to roads Start @ LAKE

Pilot Implementation

9

Page 10: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Mar. 19-30: LAKEApr. 2-20: DEVAApr. 23-May 11: JOTRMay 14-25: MOJAMay 28-June 1: LAKEJune 4-8: MOJAJune 11-29: PARAJuly 9-27: GRBAJuly 30-Aug. 3: MANZ

Pilot Field Schedule

10

Page 11: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Spring, 2012◦Field crew lead – Michael Brewer

Crew safety, logistics Backcountry travel plans, communications

◦SCA crew recruited (2/27/12) 4 members training

◦Botanist contractor

Field Crew

11

Page 12: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Safety training◦1st aid/wilderness 1st aid, 4WD, Operational

Leadership Orienteering

◦Map/compass, GPSData managementField training

◦Site characterization, macroplot set-up, point-intercept, basal-canopy gaps, invasive quadrats, invasives site assessment, repeat photos, unknown plants

◦Soils (contractor: Debbie Soukup)

Crew Training Schedule

12

Page 13: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Soils Training

13

Page 14: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

3/22/12 @ LAKE Pilot Implementation

14

Page 15: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Complete pilot – summer, 2012◦DEVA – Apr. 3

1st year implementation – fall, 2012, or 2013

Future Plans – Field

15

Page 16: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Alice Chung-MacCoubrey, Scott Newbold, & Burt Pendleton for providing the ground work for this protocol

Vegetation Working Group (Jane Cipra, DEVA; Ben Roberts, GRBA; Josh Hoines, JOTR; Alice Newton, LAKE; Les Inafuku, MANZ; Neal Darby, MOJA; Jennifer Fox, PARA) for comments on the protocol, park logistics, field sites, and park permitting.◦ Quarterly conference calls

Acknowledgements

16

Page 18: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

18

Page 19: Integrated Uplands Protocol Progress

Invasive Plants: S&T vs. ED

19