institutional perspectives on (a) programme review and (b) portfolio preparation: the agony, the...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Institutional perspectives on (a) programme review and (b) portfolio preparation: The agony, the anger and the angst!](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082713/5697bfbf1a28abf838ca2e37/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Institutional perspectives on (a) programme review and (b)
portfolio preparation: The agony, the anger and the
angst!
![Page 2: Institutional perspectives on (a) programme review and (b) portfolio preparation: The agony, the anger and the angst!](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082713/5697bfbf1a28abf838ca2e37/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Programme review
Challenges
The challenge of shared ownership of the process (programme quality is everybody’s business).
The challenge of co-ordination among participants (e.g. quality office, management, staff, support services, students).
The challenge of finding time amidst tight schedules. The data challenge and the assistance of the
institutional audit visit from an institutional perspective.
Physical setup for easy access and communication as well as financial implications of visits.
![Page 3: Institutional perspectives on (a) programme review and (b) portfolio preparation: The agony, the anger and the angst!](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082713/5697bfbf1a28abf838ca2e37/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Programme review
Advantages/benefitsAssisted with improving communication
within and across programmes.Assisted in taking a holistic view of a
programme.Assisted in sensitising participants for the
spectrum of quality issues/criteria involved in programme offerings.
Assisted in clarifying role differentiation and responsibility for programmes.
![Page 4: Institutional perspectives on (a) programme review and (b) portfolio preparation: The agony, the anger and the angst!](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082713/5697bfbf1a28abf838ca2e37/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Portfolio preparation
• Staff time: always a problem. • Participation and input (writing with
and not writing for).• Critical readers and inputs.• Balancing the report (being
“objective”).• Obtaining data.• Putting everything together in a
meaningful way.
![Page 5: Institutional perspectives on (a) programme review and (b) portfolio preparation: The agony, the anger and the angst!](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082713/5697bfbf1a28abf838ca2e37/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)