index of multiple deprivation 2015 borough level results · pdf file1 index of multiple...

1

Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 – Borough level results Executive Summary DCLG has recently published the latest Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD 2015), comprising deprivation scores and National ranks for all LSOAs in England, plus LEP and borough summary results. Since it uses the same methodology and very similar indicators to the previous analyses (in 2007 and 2010), the results are effectively comparable. In general, the results of IMD 2015 are consistent with those of previous IMDs, with no major changes to the pattern and extent of deprivation in the Tees Valley. The Tees Valley still has a high proportion of LSOAs within the national most deprived 10%. Ward level results have been calculated by TVU and summary tables for each borough included in Annex 3. Maps at LSOA and ward level by borough have also been produced and can be found in Annex 4. At the borough level and out of 326 districts nationally, Middlesbrough has the highest proportion of LSOAs within the national most deprived 10% with Hartlepool 10th, Redcar & Cleveland 33rd, Stockton-on-Tees 47th and Darlington 58th. 1 Introduction and Methodology The IMD 2015 uses an identical methodology to previous IMDs, where a wide variety of indicators are combined into seven domains as pictured below. Note that the domains are given different weightings reflecting their perceived impact on the overall IMD measure.

These domains are then combined into overall deprivation scores for each LSOA, which are then

ranked. The indicators used in the IMD 2015 are listed in Annex 1. They are generally similar to

those used in the IMD 2010 and IMD 2007 previously, so as the same methodology is used, the

results are of the three analyses are effectively comparable. As before, results are calculated for

LSOAs within England and summaries of the LSOA results are published at LEP and borough level.

2

2 Borough Results The IMD 2015 contains the same set of borough / district rankings as previous IMDs (see Annex 2). The borough rankings are summaries of the results of LSOA level within each borough, as the IMD does not analyse borough level data. The borough rankings vary greatly in usefulness – the ‘scale’ measures convey little information as they are based purely on numbers of people, not rates. Table 1 below summarises these findings. Table 1. Tees Valley IMD Borough Rankings (out of 326 districts)

Rank of Average

Score

Rank of Average

Rank

Rank of Local

Concen- tration

Rank of Extent

Rank of Income

Scale

Rank of Employ-

ment Scale

IMD 2015

Darlington 97 122 50 84 134 133

Hartlepool 18 32 14 17 113 110

Middlesbrough 6 16 2 5 64 63

Redcar & Cleveland 49 78 15 48 94 88

Stockton-on-Tees 88 130 27 69 75 66

IMD 2010

Darlington 75 104 34 65 138 133

Hartlepool 24 30 13 21 112 100



Stockton-on-Tees 100 137 32 75 81 67

IMD 2007

Darlington 87 108 49 76 140 128

Hartlepool 22 33 18 18 109 96



Stockton-on-Tees 90 128 33 72 81 68

Of the six rankings, the rank of Average Score, Local Concentration and Extent are the most important, with the rank of Average Scores giving an impression of the overall level of deprivation, Extent showing how much of the borough is very deprived and Concentration indicating the deprivation of the most severely deprived areas within the borough. The general picture for the Tees Valley is little changed between the IMD 2007, IMD 2010 and IMD 2015.

3

3 Analysis of LSOA Rankings The proportion of LSOAs within the most deprived 10% nationally can be calculated for all local authorities and ranked, as shown in Table 2 below. These generally show little change with Middlesbrough having the highest proportion of LSOAs in the most deprived 10% in the country. Table 2. Ranks of Percentage of Borough’s LSOAs within most deprived 10%

2015 2010 2007

Darlington 58 45 52

Hartlepool 10 10 14

Middlesbrough 1 1 6

Redcar & Cleveland 33 36 40

Stockton-on-Tees 47 57 62

The map below shows the distribution of LSOA scores across Tees Valley. The five bandings - Most deprived 10%, Most deprived 10-20%, Most deprived 20-40%, Most deprived 40-60% and Least deprived 40% - are consistent with those applied in the borough level maps presented in Annex 4.

4

4 Domains As mentioned above, the IMD analysis is based on calculation of deprivation in seven separate domains, whose results are combined into an overall score. The individual domain scores and ranks are published. Table 3 shows the percentage of each Borough’s LSOAs that are ranked in the National most deprived 10% for each domain. Table 3. Percentage of LSOAs in National Most Deprived 10% - Domains

Overall Income Employ-

ment Health Educa-

tion Barriers to Serv Crime

Living Envt

2015 % % % % % % % %

Darlington 15 17 20 20 14 2 9 0

Hartlepool 33 36 41 41 21 2 12 0

Middlesbrough 49 49 48 56 44 0 38 1

Redcar & Cleveland 22 24 30 31 18 0 10 1

Stockton-on-Tees 18 22 23 21 18 3 3 1

Tees Valley 27 29 32 33 23 1 14 1

2010

Darlington 17 18 20 35 14 3 5 5

Hartlepool 34 38 50 43 24 0 14 0

Middlesbrough 49 43 45 57 41 1 42 13


Stockton-on-Tees 14 18 23 25 13 2 5 1

Tees Valley 26 26 33 38 25 1 15 4

2007

Darlington 15 15 20 20 17 3 0 3

Hartlepool 33 36 50 43 21 0 16 0

Middlesbrough 45 40 45 52 41 1 50 12


Stockton-on-Tees 13 13 24 18 18 3 12 1

Tees Valley 24 23 33 31 24 1 18 4

5 Estimated ward ranks Whilst the IMD produces results for LSOAs, it is possible to estimate approximate national ward ranks based on the LSOA scores. Annex 3 shows TVU’s estimated ranks for current Tees Valley Wards, with ranks being out of 7,522 where Rank 1 is most deprived. 6 Conclusion Overall, the results of the IMD 2015 do not indicate significant changes in deprivation in the Tees Valley relative to elsewhere. The general pattern of deprivation locally and at borough level has changed little. 7 Further Information More detailed data and analysis can be obtained from TVU. All results from the IMD 2015, along with more detailed information on the methodology and indicators used, and a national summary report can be downloaded from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015

5

Annex 1

Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 Indicator List

Income Deprivation Domain Adults and children in Income Support families

Adults and children in income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance families

Adults and children in income-based Employment and Support Allowance families

Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) families

Adults and children in Working Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit families not already counted, that is those who are not in receipt of Income Support, income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, income-based Employment and Support Allowance or Pension Credit (Guarantee) and whose equivalised income (excluding housing benefit) is below 60 per cent of the median before housing costs

Asylum seekers in England in receipt of subsistence support, accommodation support, or both.

Employment Deprivation Domain Claimants of Jobseeker’s Allowance (both contribution-based and income-based), women

aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64

Claimants of Employment and Support Allowance, women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64

Claimants of Incapacity Benefit, women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64

Claimants of Severe Disablement Allowance, women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64

NEW – Claimants of Carer’s Allowance, women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64.

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain Children and Young People sub-domain

Key Stage 2 attainment: The average points score of pupils taking reading, writing and mathematics Key Stage 2 exams12

Key Stage 4 attainment: The average capped points score of pupils taking Key Stage 4

Secondary school absence: The proportion of authorised and unauthorised absences from secondary school

Staying on in education post 16: The proportion of young people not staying on in school or non-advanced education above age 16

Entry to higher education: A measure of young people aged under 21 not entering higher education.

Adult Skills sub-domain

Adult skills: The proportion of working age adults with no or low qualifications, women aged 25 to 59 and men aged 25 to 64

NEW – English language proficiency: The proportion of working age adults who cannot speak English or cannot speak English well, women aged 25 to 59 and men aged 25 to 64.

Health Deprivation and Disability Domain Years of potential life lost: An age and sex standardised measure of premature death

Comparative illness and disability ratio: An age and sex standardised morbidity/disability ratio

Acute morbidity: An age and sex standardised rate of emergency admission to hospital

6

Mood and anxiety disorders: A composite based on the rate of adults suffering from mood and anxiety disorders, hospital episodes data, suicide mortality data and health benefits data.

Crime Domain Violence – number of reported violent crimes (18 reported crime types) per 1000 at risk

population

Burglary – number of reported burglaries (4 reported crime types) per 1000 at risk population

Theft – number of reported thefts (5 reported crime types) per 1000 at risk population

Criminal damage – number of reported crimes (8 reported crime types) per 1000 at risk population.

Barriers to Housing and Services Domain Geographical Barriers sub-domain

Road distance to a post office

Road distance to a primary school

Road distance to a general store or supermarket

Road distance to a GP surgery. Wider Barriers sub-domain

Household overcrowding: The proportion of all households in a Lower-layer Super Output Area which are judged to have insufficient space to meet the household’s needs

Homelessness: Local authority district level rate of acceptances for housing assistance under the homelessness provisions of the 1996 Housing Act, assigned to the constituent Lower-layer Super Output Areas

Housing affordability: Difficulty of access to owner-occupation or the private rental market, expressed as the inability to afford to enter owner occupation or the private rental market.

Living Environment Deprivation Domain Indoors sub-domain

Houses without central heating: The proportion of houses that do not have central heating

Housing in poor condition: The proportion of social and private homes that fail to meet the Decent Homes standard.

Outdoors sub-domain

Air quality: A measure of air quality based on emissions rates for four pollutants

Road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists: A measure of road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists among the resident and workplace population.

7

Annex 2 Index of Multiple Deprivation District Rankings

Average of LSOA Scores is the population weighted average of the combined scores for the LSOAs in a local authority district.

Average of LSOA Ranks is the population weighted average of the combined ranks for the LSOAs in a local authority district.

Extent is the proportion of a local authority district’s population living in the most deprived LSOAs in the country.

Local Concentration is the population weighted average of the ranks of a district’s most deprived LSOAs that contain exactly 10% of the local authority district’s population.

Income Scale is the number of people who are Income deprived (NB- Number not proportion).

Employment Scale is the number of people who are Employment deprived (NB- Number not proportion).

8

Annex 3 Estimated National Ward ranks – Darlington

Darlington Wards (2015) IMD 2015 IMD 2010 IMD 2007Change

2010-2015

Change

2007-2015

Bank Top & Lascelles 613 474 623 139 -10

Brinkburn & Faverdale 5,307 4,647 4,978 660 329

Cockerton 1,016 884 956 132 60

College 6,391 4,958 5,074 1,433 1,317

Eastbourne 1,281 649 574 632 707

Harrowgate Hill 4,437 4,071 4,089 366 348

Haughton & Springfield 2,072 2,075 1,981 -3 91

Heighington & Coniscliffe 5,533 5,438 5,157 95 376

Hummersknott 7,221 7,082 7,004 139 217

Hurworth 5,213 4,468 4,834 745 379

Mowden 7,322 6,828 7,021 494 301

North Road 622 574 965 48 -343

Northgate 419 267 438 152 -19

Park East 273 194 290 79 -17

Park West 4,644 3,988 4,079 656 565

Pierremont 2,114 1,783 2,103 331 11

Red Hall & Lingfield 861 930 952 -69 -91

Sadberge & Middleton St. George 5,248 4,535 4,552 713 696

Stephenson 724 466 598 258 126

Whinfield 2,953 2,899 3,024 54 -71 Within 10% most deprived ward nationally

Within 10-20% most deprived ward nationally

9

Estimated National Ward ranks – Hartlepool

Hartlepool Wards (2015) IMD 2015 IMD 2010 IMD 2007Change

2010-2015

Change

2007-2015

Burn Valley 486 661 758 -175 -272

De Bruce 390 293 341 97 49

Fens and Rossmere 2,338 1,797 1,773 541 565

Foggy Furze 1,252 1,153 1,163 99 89

Hart 4,674 4,952 3,475 -278 1,199

Headland and Harbour 137 99 109 38 28

Jesmond 303 274 316 29 -13

Manor House 147 176 172 -29 -25

Rural West 5,935 5,809 5,466 126 469

Seaton 2,529 2,157 2,127 372 402

Victoria 322 324 347 -2 -25

Within 10% most deprived ward nationally


10

Estimated National Ward ranks – Middlesbrough

Middlesbrough Wards (2015) IMD 2015 IMD 2010 IMD 2007Change

2010-2015

Change

2007-2015

Acklam 5,438 5,211 3,847 227 1,591

Ayresome 670 581 546 89 124

Berwick Hills & Pallister 27 54 60 -27 -33

Brambles & Thorntree 10 22 23 -12 -13

Central 30 23 30 7 0

Coulby Newham 1,339 1,715 1,546 -376 -207

Hemlington 228 320 276 -92 -48

Kader 4,853 4,821 4,049 32 804

Ladgate 1,188 1,195 1,086 -7 102

Linthorpe 2,767 3,086 2,367 -319 400

Longlands & Beechwood 60 73 72 -13 -12

Marton East 5,614 4,837 3,618 777 1,996

Marton West 6,310 6,447 5,771 -137 539

Newport 38 87 123 -49 -85

North Ormesby 2 7 46 -5 -44

Nunthorpe 7,024 6,992 6,735 32 289

Park 742 1,070 953 -328 -211

Park End & Beckfield 99 164 130 -65 -31

Stainton & Thornton 2,013 2,721 2,575 -708 -562

Trimdon 4,956 5,011 4,445 -55 511



11

Estimated National Ward ranks – Redcar & Cleveland

Redcar and Cleveland Wards

(2015)IMD 2015 IMD 2010 IMD 2007

Change

2010-2015

Change

2007-2015

Brotton 1,078 1,180 1,295 -102 -217

Coatham 251 311 265 -60 -14

Dormanstown 1,127 1,168 1,023 -41 104

Eston 508 633 572 -125 -64

Grangetown 6 4 9 2 -3

Guisborough 1,200 1,701 1,645 -501 -445

Hutton 6,305 6,227 5,733 78 572

Kirkleatham 370 388 368 -18 2

Lockwood 632 686 713 -54 -81

Loftus 533 590 814 -57 -281

Longbeck 6,009 5,469 4,616 540 1,393

Newcomen 1,165 880 706 285 459

Normanby 2,361 2,378 1,885 -17 476

Ormesby 2,027 2,073 1,854 -46 173

St. Germain's 3,413 2,966 2,761 447 652

Saltburn 2,456 1,863 2,007 593 449

Skelton 1,732 1,625 1,366 107 366

South Bank 182 205 223 -23 -41

Teesville 1,208 1,191 1,098 17 110

West Dyke 6,180 5,723 5,077 457 1,103

Westworth 4,090 3,693 3,644 397 446

Zetland 2,832 2,447 2,634 385 198



12

Estimated National Ward ranks – Stockton-on-Tees

Stockton-on-Tees Wards (2015) IMD 2015 IMD 2010 IMD 2007Change

2010-2015

Change

2007-2015

Billingham Central 1,128 1,268 1,088 -140 40

Billingham East 461 647 668 -186 -207

Billingham North 5,067 5,350 4,901 -283 166

Billingham South 1,359 1,344 1,509 15 -150

Billingham West 6,035 5,523 5,007 512 1,028

Bishopsgarth and Elm Tree 3,141 3,071 3,362 70 -221

Eaglescliffe 6,410 6,501 5,973 -91 437

Fairfield 4,998 4,785 5,130 213 -132

Grangefield 4,960 4,825 4,437 135 523

Hardwick and Salters Lane 232 284 449 -52 -217

Hartburn 6,551 6,667 6,598 -116 -47

Ingleby Barwick East 6,732 7,317 7,261 -585 -529

Ingleby Barwick West 6,812 7,280 7,168 -468 -356

Mandale and Victoria 652 452 401 200 251

Newtown 129 180 203 -51 -74

Northern Parishes 6,302 6,557 6,157 -255 145

Norton North 1,064 989 951 75 113

Norton South 980 1,031 1,101 -51 -121

Norton West 5,958 5,980 5,534 -22 424

Parkfield and Oxbridge 505 592 664 -87 -159

Roseworth 459 768 797 -309 -338

Stainsby Hill 796 870 897 -74 -101

Stockton Town Centre 13 13 12 0 1

Village 1,775 1,435 1,455 340 320

Western Parishes 4,545 4,203 4,061 342 484

Yarm 6,490 6,244 5,576 246 914



13

Annex 4 Darlington IMD maps

14

Hartlepool IMD maps

15

Middlesbrough IMD maps

17

Redcar & Cleveland IMD maps

18

Stockton-on-Tees IMD maps

index of multiple deprivation 2015 borough level results · pdf file1 index of multiple...

Documents