income and life condition as predictors of young people cultural participation in poland statistical...
TRANSCRIPT
Income and life condition as predictors of young people cultural participation in Poland
Statistical Office – CracowMichał ChlebickiSeweryn GrodnyPrzemysław Solecki
Presentation structure
1. Short information about analysed sample.2. Three variables that could have influence
on cultural participation: Household income Head of household education level Place of living
3. Does any others variables have influence on cultural participation? Line regression.
4. Conclusions
1. Short information about analysing sample
People between 15 and 24 years old Average age was 19,27 and median was 19 52% of females vs. 48% of males Average household income was 555,80 €
per month
2.a. Income as predictor of cultural participation Income per capita in household. Four groups of
income (in Euro): 0 – 44 45 – 119 120 – 234 More than 234
12%38%
45%5%
0% 20% 40% 60%
0-4445-119120-234More then 234
2.a. Income as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – TV watching
Tabela krzyżowa TV watching * Income per capita
16 197 205 75 493
17,0% 22,5% 29,0% 33,2% 25,9%
26 275 232 67 600
27,7% 31,5% 32,8% 29,6% 31,6%
52 402 270 84 808
55,3% 46,0% 38,2% 37,2% 42,5%
94 874 707 226 1901
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequency
% fromIncome percapita
Frequency
% fromIncome percapita
Frequency
% fromIncome percapita
Frequency
% fromIncome percapita
less than everyday
everyday less than 2h
everyday longer than 2h
TV watching
Total
0-44 45-119 120-234more
than 234
Income per capita
Total
Crosstable
2.a. Income as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Computer using
Tabela krzyżowa Using of computer at home * Income per capita
73 509 226 35 843
79,3% 59,2% 32,2% 15,8% 45,0%
2 28 27 6 63
2,2% 3,3% 3,9% 2,7% 3,4%
6 118 131 34 289
6,5% 13,7% 18,7% 15,4% 15,4%
11 205 317 146 679
12,0% 23,8% 45,2% 66,1% 36,2%
92 860 701 221 1874
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
non-using
few times permonth and less
few times perweek
everyday
Using ofcomputer athome
Total
0-44 45-119 120-234more than
234
Income per capita
Total
Crosstable
2.a. Income as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Cinema attendance
Tabela krzyżowa Cinema attendance * Income per capita
58 284 121 25 488
62,4% 32,5% 17,2% 11,1% 25,7%
35 572 568 172 1347
37,6% 65,4% 80,7% 76,1% 71,0%
0 18 15 29 62
,0% 2,1% 2,1% 12,8% 3,3%
93 874 704 226 1897
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% form Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% form Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% form Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% form Incomeper capita
non atendance
once per monthand less
more than onceper month
Cinemaattendance
Total
0-44 45-119 120-234more than
234
Income per capita
Total
Crosstable
2.a. Income as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Theatre attendance
Tabela krzyżowa Theater attendance * Income per capita
88 770 583 165 1606
93,6% 88,2% 82,5% 73,0% 84,5%
6 103 124 61 294
6,4% 11,8% 17,5% 27,0% 15,5%
94 873 707 226 1900
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
non-attendance
attendance
Theaterattendance
Total
0-44 45-119 120-234more
than 234
Income per capita
Total
Crosstable
2.a. Income as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Concert attendance
Tabela krzyżowa Concert attendance (other than filharmonic) * Income per capita
79 676 464 117 1336
84,0% 77,3% 65,7% 51,8% 70,3%
15 198 242 109 564
16,0% 22,7% 34,3% 48,2% 29,7%
94 874 706 226 1900
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
non-attendance
attendance
Concertattendance(other thanfilharmonic)
Total
0-44 45-119 120-234more than
234
Income per capita
Total
Crosstable
2.a. Income as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people –Party with friends
Tabela krzyżowa
27 127 46 6 206
29,0% 14,6% 6,5% 2,7% 10,9%
21 195 115 25 356
22,6% 22,4% 16,3% 11,1% 18,8%
22 267 197 61 547
23,7% 30,7% 27,9% 27,0% 28,9%
15 178 184 62 439
16,1% 20,5% 26,1% 27,4% 23,2%
8 103 164 72 347
8,6% 11,8% 23,2% 31,9% 18,3%
93 870 706 226 1895
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
Frequancy
% from Incomeper capita
non-attendance
1-3 times per year
4-6 times per year
7-12 times per year
more than 12 timesper year
Party withfriendsattendancein last year
Total
0-44 45-119 120-234more
than 234
Income per capita
Total
Crosstable
2.b. Head of household level of education as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people
Householder education contain four levels : primary school and lower secondary school – technical secondary school - comprehensive school tertiary school
9%10%
64%17%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
primary school and lower
secondary - technical
secondary - comprehensiveschooltertiary school
2.b. Head of household level of education as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Reading in general
Tabela krzyżowa Book reading within last 12 month * Education
119 199 24 9 351
36,7% 16,5% 12,6% 5,2% 18,5%
205 1008 166 165 1544
63,3% 83,5% 87,4% 94,8% 81,5%
324 1207 190 174 1895
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
No, Ididn't
Yes, Idid
Bookreadingwithin last 12month
Total
primaryschool
and lowersecondary- technical
secondary -comprehensive school
tertiaryschool
Education
Total
Crosstable
2.b. Head of household level of education as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Reading newspapers
Tabela krzyżowa
104 251 28 31 414
32,0% 20,8% 14,7% 17,9% 21,9%
147 540 86 74 847
45,2% 44,8% 45,3% 42,8% 44,7%
53 322 49 41 465
16,3% 26,7% 25,8% 23,7% 24,6%
21 93 27 27 168
6,5% 7,7% 14,2% 15,6% 8,9%
325 1206 190 173 1894
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
non-reading
once perweek andless
2- 4 timesper week
everyday
Readingnewspaper
Ogółem
primaryschool and
lowersecondary -
technical
secondary -comprehensive school
tertiaryschool
Education
Ogółem
Crosstable
2.b. Head of household level of education as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Reading magazines
Tabela krzyżowa
72 195 21 22 310
22,2% 16,2% 11,1% 12,6% 16,4%
63 229 24 22 338
19,4% 19,0% 12,6% 12,6% 17,8%
119 527 95 78 819
36,6% 43,7% 50,0% 44,8% 43,2%
71 256 50 52 429
21,8% 21,2% 26,3% 29,9% 22,6%
325 1207 190 174 1896
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
Frequency
% fromEducation
non-reading
less then 3times perquarter
1- 3 timesper month
every week
Readingmagazine
Ogółem
primaryschool and
lowersecondary -
technical
secondary -comprehensive school
tertiaryschool
Education
Ogółem
Crosstable
2.b. Head of household level of education as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Opera attendance
Tabela krzyżowa
320 1166 178 148 1812
99,1% 97,0% 94,7% 86,5% 96,2%
3 36 10 23 72
,9% 3,0% 5,3% 13,5% 3,8%
323 1202 188 171 1884
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% fromEducation
Frequancy
% fromEducation
Frequancy
% fromEducation
non-attendance
attendance
Opera
Total
primaryschool and
lowersecondary -
technical
secondary -comprehensive school
tertiaryschool
Education
Total
Crosstable
2.b. Head of household level of education as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Philharmonic attendance
Tabela krzyżowa
321 1138 176 154 1789
98,8% 94,1% 92,6% 88,5% 94,3%
4 71 14 20 109
1,2% 5,9% 7,4% 11,5% 5,7%
325 1209 190 174 1898
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% fromEducation
Frequancy
% fromEducation
Frequancy
% fromEducation
non-attendance
attendance
Philharmonic
Total
primaryschool
and lowersecondary- technical
secondary -comprehensive school
tertiaryschool
Education
Total
Crosstable
2.c. Place of living as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people
Place of living contain four levels : village less than 100 thou. citizens 100 - 500 thou. citizens more than 500 thou. citizens
12%18%
32%38%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
villageless than 100 thou. citizens100 - 500 thou. citizensmore than 500 thou. citizens
2.c. Place of living as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Internet using
Tabela krzyżowa
178 104 36 29 347
32,0% 20,3% 12,5% 14,4% 22,3%
219 164 78 38 499
39,4% 32,0% 27,2% 18,9% 32,0%
120 116 70 40 346
21,6% 22,6% 24,4% 19,9% 22,2%
39 129 103 94 365
7,0% 25,1% 35,9% 46,8% 23,4%
556 513 287 201 1557
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% from placeof living
Frequancy
% from placeof living
Frequancy
% from placeof living
Frequancy
% from placeof living
Frequancy
% from placeof living
non-using
few times permonthand less
few times per week
everyday
Using ofInternet
Total
villageless than 100thou. citizens
100 - 500thou. citizens
more than500 thou.citizens
Place of living
Total
Crosstable
2.c. Place of living as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Cinema attendance
Tabela krzyżowa
260 155 51 22 488
35,3% 25,5% 15,5% 9,9% 25,7%
468 442 258 179 1347
63,5% 72,8% 78,2% 80,3% 71,0%
9 10 21 22 62
1,2% 1,6% 6,4% 9,9% 3,3%
737 607 330 223 1897
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% from placeof living
Frequancy
% from placeof living
Frequancy
% from placeof living
Frequancy
% from placeof living
non atendance
once per monthand less
more than onceper month
Cinemaattendance
Total
village
less than 100 thou.citizens
100 - 500thou.
citizens
more than500 thou.citizens
Place of living
Total
Crosstable
2.c. Place of living as predictor of cultural participation of young Polish people – Theatre attendance
Tabela krzyżowa
673 530 253 150 1606
91,3% 87,0% 76,4% 67,3% 84,5%
64 79 78 73 294
8,7% 13,0% 23,6% 32,7% 15,5%
737 609 331 223 1900
100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Frequancy
% fromplace ofliving
Frequancy
% fromplace ofliving
Frequancy
% fromplace ofliving
non-attendance
attendance
theaterattendance
Total
village
less than 100 thou.citizens
100 - 500thou.
citizens
more than500 thou.citizens
place of living
Total
Crosstable
4. Conclusions Income is important till some level. It gives means for
cultural participation. After this level,habitus become more important. We
can defined habitus as group of habits, behaving, way of living. For example P. Bourdieu proved that people, whose grandparents and parents finished university are more likely to buy antique furniture than people whose only parents finished university.
If we collected data like above, then we would be able to explain more how people participate in different cultural activities.
All variable are correlated. That means that variable explain partly each other.
Thank You!