incoherent φ photo-production from deuteron at spring-8/leps m. miyabe...
TRANSCRIPT
Incoherent φ photo-production from deuteron at SPring-8/LEPS
M. Miyabe博士論文審査5人委員会
contents
• Physics motivation• Experiment• Analysis• Results • Conclusion and discussion• summary
Vector Meson Photo-production
● Vector Meson Dominance
● Meson Exchange
● Pomeron Exchange
N
N
(~ss)
q
_q
_qq =
Dominant at low energies
Slowly increasing with energyAlmost constant around threshold uud
p p
p p
M.A. Pichowsky and T.-S. H. LeePRD 56, 1644 (1997)
Prediction from Pomeron exchange
Prediction from meson exchange
Data from: LAMP2('83), DESY('76), SLAC('73), CERN('82),FNAL('79,'82), ZEUS('95,'96)
Prediction : dominant contribution formpseudo scalar meson exchangenear threshold
Vector Meson Photo-production
Titov, Lee, Toki Phys.Rev C59(1999) 2993
Data from: SLAC('73), Bonn(’74),DESY(’78)
Natural parity exchange
Unnatural parity exchange
Important to distinguish natural parity exchanges from unnatural ones
P2: 2ndpomeron ~ 0+glueball
(Nakano, Toki (1998))
=0
deg
ree)
photo-production near threshold
Polarization observables with linearly polarized photon
Decay Plane // natural parity exchange (-1)J (Pomeron, Scalar mesons)
Polarizationvector of
K+
K+
K-
In meson rest frame
Decay Plane unnatural parity exchange -(-1)J
(Pseudo scalar mesons )
Relative contributions from natural, unnatural parity exchanges
Decay angular distribution of meson
K+
K+
K-
p’
meson rest frame (Gottfried-Jackson(GJ) frame)
K+
K+
K-
polProduction
planez
Decayplane
z-axis
K+-pol
direction of linear polarization
Decay angular distribution of meson
Decay angular distribution
● W0,W1,W2 are parameterized by the 9 spin density matrix elements. Re() Im() andIm()
),(),,( 0 WW
),()2sin(),()2cos( 21 WPWP Unpolarized part
Polarized part
K.Schilling et al. Nucl. Phys. B15(1970) 408
Spin density matrix elements
)(2cos~12
1)( 3
PW
2
12
1 cos~sin~121
23
)(cosW
22 cos~21
2
1)( W
)(2cos~12
1)( 4
PW
2cos~12
1)( 5 PW
1-dimensional projections
100
1115
211
1114
211
1113
0112
0001
2~Im2/1~Im2/1~
~
~
Relations to standard definition
distribution
Prediction by A. Titov (PRC,2003)
Pure naturalparity exchange
Pure unnaturalparity exchange
0
P, glueball, , f2’
p
)(2cos~12
1)( 3
PW
11
LEPS result (proton)
Peak structure around 2GeV.Natural parity exchange is dominant → 0+ glueball ?Pseudo scalar meson exchange is not negligible.
T. Mibe, et al. nucl-ex/0506015
Explore the exotic process• Is the bump structure candidate of 2nd Pomeron
(glueball)?– Only decay asymmetry can explain using Pseudo
scalar exchange, But for cross section enhancement, Need to natural parity exchange comparable effect from Pseudo scalar exchange process.
– Detailed study for pseudo scalar π-η exchange is important.
To study incoherent photo-production from deuteron is unique tool.
2005/09/21 HAW05 13
φ photo-production of Deuteron
1. Coherent production– Interact with deuteron
itself.
2. Incoherent production– Interact with proton or
neutron in deuteron.
2005/09/21 HAW05 14
Coherent production• Deuteron is iso-scalar target
– Iso-vector π exchange is forbidden.• Pure natural parity exchange except for η-exchange process.
LEPS result
Differential cross section Decay asymmetry
Differential cross section at t=tmin showsDecreasing with energy. Dashed line shows theoretical calcuration.
Decay asymmetry showsnatural parity exchange is dominant
From coherent result
• Differential cross section– Increase with energy– Not only Pomeron and η-exchange
• Decay asymmetry– Pure natural-parity exchange– η-exchange is weak?
Additional natural parity process is required!
Incoherent production• Due to isospin effect,
– gπnn = - gπpp → destructive– gηnn = gηpp → constructive π-η interference effectDetail Information for unnatural (π/η) exchange process
2005/09/21 HAW05 17
g(π, η)NN
gφγ (π, η)
π,η
φγ
N N
Differential cross section for as a function of energy and angle.
For πη interference effect, neutron cross section decrease at low energy and forward angle.
Decay asymmetry as a function of energy and η-exchange strength
Decay asymmetry Σφ=2ρ3
Eγ=2 GeV
Large difference for decay asymmetry cause large η-exchange process
Aim of this thesis
• Differential cross section for incoherent process– (π 、 η)-interference
• Decay asymmetry for γ+N→φ+N – η-exchange process magnitude
Extract clearly quasi-free γ+N→φ+N eventExplore the exotic pomeron exchange in the Bump
structure.
Nuclear transparency ratio
• T=σA/(A*σN ) (=Pout)• Mass number
dependence is larger than theoretical calculation.
• Large σφN in nuclear medium.– How about duteron
case?
EXPERIMENT
The LEPS beamline
Linearly polarized Photon
• Backward Compton scattering by using UV laser light• Intensity (typ.) : 2.5 * 106 cps• Tagging Region : 1.5 GeV< E < 2.4 GeV• Linear Polarization : 95 % at 2.4 GeV
E (Tagger) (GeV)E (GeV)
Cou
nts
Line
ar
pola
rizat
ion
Charged particle spectrometer
1m
TOF wall
MWDC 2
MWDC 3
MWDC 1
Dipole Magnet (0.7 T)
Liquid Hydrogen Target50mm-long (2000 Dec.-2001June)150mm-long (2002May-July)
Start counter
Silicon VertexDetector
AerogelCerenkov(n=1.03)
Summary of data taking
● Trigger condition : TAG*UpVeto*STA*AC*TOF● Run period
I (50mm-long LH2) 2000,Dec. – 2001, June
II (150mm-long LH2) 2002,May - 2002.JulyIII (150mm-long LD2) 2002,July – 2003 Feb, Apr-Jun
● Total number of trigger I 1.83*108 trigger (~50% Horizontal, ~50% Vertical pol.) II 1.71*108 trigger III 4.64*108 trigger
ANALYSIS
φ Event selection
• Number of track ≧1• K+ , K- Particle Identification cut (PID)• Decay in flight cut (DIF)• Vertex cut• Tagger• Invariant Mass K+K- cut• Missing Mass cut
Particle identification and decay in flight cut
Kaon identification is 4σ
• Consistency of TOF hit position– Difference of y-position of
TOF ≦80mm– Difference TOF slat number
≦ 1
• Number of outlier– Noutl ≦ 6
• χ2 probability– Prob(χ2)≧0.02
Decay in flight cut
Vertex cut
-1120. < Vertex z < 880. -30< Vertex(x,y) < 30
Invariant mass K+K-
• Fit with Gaussian convoluted breit-weigner
• Resolution~1.5MeV
Cut point for invariant mass is 10MeV
Missing Mass cut
• Missing mass distribution forγ + p → φ X (MMp)
• From the fermi motion effect
• Cut for MMp at LD2 set to 80 MeV
Summary of φ selection
Procedure analysis for quasi-free like Incoherent γ+N→φ+N production
• LEPS spectrometer has designed for forward φ→K+K- event– Exclusive γ+n→φ+n event can’t accept.
Precisely analysis for possible reactions is required.Coherent processFinal State Interaction(FSI)Fermi motion effectFortunately, exclusive γ+p→φ+p has a small
acceptance.
Energy Definitions
For cross section
For decay asymmetry
Minimum momentum spectator approxmation
γ
np
n
p
φ
n
p
PCM
np
γ PKK
EKK
PγEγ
Pmiss
Emiss
In the lab system, the missing momentumBecome minimum at the direction is anti-parallel to photon
The momentum of pn system as
Pmin characteristic
• coherent process– Pmin ~ +0.15
– Dominant Pmin ≧0.1
• Quasi-free process make peak around zero.
• Other inelastic reactions distribute large negative value.
Monte-Carlo simulation for Pmin
• coherent process– Dominant > 0.1GeV
• Quasi-free process clear symmetric peak around zero.
• around Pmin ~ 0.1GeV cut point for quasi-free process
Pmin distribution in MC
Extract quasi-free incoherent process
Pmin distribution Real with MCContamination from coherent as a function of Pmin cut
Coherent contamination is large in High energy region about 10% at Pmin≦0.09 in this estimation
Validity check for Quasi-free process cut |Pmin |≦ 0.9
slope Differential cross section
Pmin cut dependence is flat |Pmin|=0.9 at Slope and cross section except for 2-Highest energy bin. In E8, about 10% fluctuation from the tighter cut.
Introduce the effective photon energy
• Pmin strongly correlated to z-component of fermi momentum inside deuteron.
• Pmin could be used for estimating Fermi momenta of target nucleons.Total center of mass
energy s of KKN system
Pmin vs. Fermi momentum z
Conversion Eγeff from Eγ
• Effective photon energy Eγeff as
s is the center of mass total energy of KKN system.
• Resolution for Eγ is improved. (~50%)
Eγ resolution
Conversion to effective photon flux
Photon flux ωγ for each Eγ as ωγ(Eγ)=εTag(Eγ) * Ntag
εTag(Eγ) : Tagger efficiencyNtag : corrected tagger scalar count
In nucleon at rest frame,
At one specific Eγeff, it depends on some Eγ which spread over because of fermi motion.Conversion ratio from each Eγ bin is calculated using Monte-Carlo.
Conversion ratio
originalEmin Emax Frac
1.573 1.673 .31905E+12
1.673 1.873 .32266E+12
1.773 1.873 .36441E+12
1.873 1.973 .39824E+12
1.973 2.073 .50882E+12
2.073 2.173 .53101E+12
2.173 2.273 .62225E+12
2.273 2.373 .53687E+12
2.373 2.473 .18670E+12
Eγeff = 1.973-2.073
0.005
0.26
0.56
0.20
New Frac (1.973-2.073) = 0.005*0.364E+12 + ・・・ +0.20*0.53E12
Eγ
Estimate the Final state interaction
• In the threshold energy, momentum of outgoing nucleon is small.– Final state interaction?
• Strength of FSI is enhanced in small relative momentum p and n. (similar kinematics in coherent)
np
n
φγ
p
Monte Carlo simulation
• Real data fitted with Monte Carlo simulation coherent, incoherent and FSI.
• FSI contribution is very weak at all energy bin.
Missing Mass distribution MMD
Black :real, red coherent green: incoherent, blue: FSI
P-N relative momentum fitP-n relative momentum fitted FSI.
χ2/ndf distributionas a function of FSI strength
Weak FSI effect become better χ2weak
FSI effect is negligible small
Background subtraction
• Assuming the Background shape is non-resonant KK event.
• Estimate the number of background with side band region.
Non-resonant K+K- invariant mass
RESULT
Differential cross section t dependence. Fitted function as dσ/dt = C*exp(-b*t)
Fitted result of slope parameter bAs a function of Eγeff
Not monotonic behavior of slope,Slope b = 3.74 +/- 0.12 (free proton b=3.38+/-0.23)
Differential cross section at t=tmin
dσ/dt at (θ=0) with Constant slope b=3.74
Differential cross section at forward angle.Not clearly seen the bump like structure.
Differential cross section with tighter Pmin cut
Not monotonic behavior of slope,Slope b = 3.45 +/- 0.13 (free proton b=3.38+/-0.23)
dσ/dt at (θ=0) with b=3.45 t dependence Pmin ≦50
Cross section decrease at E1~E3
3-particle KKp mode
dσ/dt at (θ=0) with Constant slope b=3.38
Cross section for Exclusive K+K-p event. Very limited statistic. The bump like structure was seen same as free proton
Decay angular distribution
ρ1~5 as a function of EγDecay angluar distribution
Conclusion and Discussion
• Differential cross section at t=tmin
– About 30% reduction from free proton
• Not a simply nuclear density effect since deuteron is loosely bounded.– φ→ω conversion?
Red : incoherent γN→φNBlack: free proton
Lower Histgram Td = (dσ/dt)N/2*(dσ/dt)p
Differential cross section in KKp mode
• Similar degree of reduction such as incoherent process– π-η interference is small
Red : exclusive KKp eventBlack: free proton
Lower Histgram Td = (dσ/dt)KKp/(dσ/dt)free p
Spin density matrix element
• ρ3N is little bit higher than free proton.
• Theoretical prediction of ρ3n is 0.25~0.30.– ρ3N is 0.23~0.25 good agreement
• Small difference ρ3
p and ρ3n
– η-exchange is small
ρ3 as a function of Eγ
ρ3
Red : γ+N→φ+NBlack : γ+p→φ+p
Tighter Pmin cut
Differential cross section at t=tmin
Red : incoherent γN→φNBlack: free proton
Red : γ+N→φ+NBlack : γ+p→φ+p
ρ3 as a function of Eγ
Decrease in Highest energy region
Summary• Differential cross section for incoherent φ photo-production shows a
significant reduction from free proton– Some effect other than nuclear density is necessary (ex, φ-ω conversion).
• From analysis for exclusive KKp event, – π-η interference is small.
• Decay asymmetry ρ3 is similar with free proton one– η exchange component is weak.
Bump structure around Eγ= 2GeV for γ+p→φ+p→ a new natural parity candidate (glueball).
Pmin≦90 MeV(50MeV) selection cut occurs a large systematic err in
highest energy bin. More detailed study is needed.
Backup figures
Eγ vs. Eγ(n)
Eγ
Eγ(n)
Spin density matrix
Horz Vert
Spin density matrix
ρ
Horz, Vert Horz+Vert
Spin density matrix element
Spin density matrix element
Vert
Horz
Pmin dependence
slope Differential cross section
Photon flux
Photon flux
Comparison to LEPS result
Tagger cut
Coherent contamination
Lambda(1520)
Non-resonant BG
2005/09/21 HAW05 76
Experiment at Spring-8
•8GeV electron storage ring Harima Hyogo
Liquid hydrogen target150mm
Drift Chamber calibration
• Depth of the multi hit TDC ~3 (before 8)
• High Voltage value of sense wire is large.
• Threshold for discri-amp is low.– Noisy level is high
t0 calibration
• Large fluctuation in TDC offset value t0 .– Every 10 run calibration.
DC-t0 run dependencerun
tdc
xt-calibration
• Xdrift = c1t+c2t2+c3t3+c4
• Correct the origin-point• Calcurate parameters
when resolution and efficiency are down
Result of calibration
Number of outlier Χ^2 probability
LH2(short)
LH2(long)
LH2(long)