in-orbit mirror performance
DESCRIPTION
In-orbit Mirror Performance. B.Stewart RAL. Topics. Instrument layout Mirror mechanism operation Background Housekeeping data FIFO data Typical data Torque level Performance since launch autoSAFE events description Feb 28 th Apr 1 st Future operation of GERB 2 & 1 paliatives - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
B.StewartRAL
In-orbit Mirror Performance
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Topics
• Instrument layout• Mirror mechanism operation• Background
– Housekeeping data– FIFO data– Typical data– Torque level
• Performance since launch• autoSAFE events
– description– Feb 28th – Apr 1st
• Future operation of GERB 2 & 1– paliatives
• GERBs 3 & 4– Potential hardware change
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Instrument layout
GERB
Earth View
Body Body
calmon
filter wheel
rotating mirror
dete
ctor
Spinning MSG
folded
telescope
optics
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Instrument Layout
• Rotation – from perspective of GERB, the Earth appears in its FOV once every 0.6 sec.
• FOV – ~24° *20° (E-W*N-S)• Earth is ~central to N-S FOV, visible for 40msec each
0.6 sec. Rotating mirror fixes Earth’s apparent position when it is in the FOV to give 40msec integration time.
• Sun also appears within E-W FOV limits every 0.6 sec. However, is only within N-S FOV near the equinoxes for ~2 months.
• What happens if mirror should stop rotating?– AutoSAFE
• How likely is it? Can we anticipate/ what can we monitor? Are there any palliatives?
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Mirror mechanism operation
• 2 sided flat mirror mounted on an axle• 22 pole motor direct drive to axle• INDUCTOSYN encoder to measure rotation
phase– 204800 steps per 360° (1 step = 0.105’)
• Electronic control system– Measures time between successive SOLs (MSG
rotation rate).– After each SOL calculates a linear ‘demand’ for
rotation phase as a function of time (at exactly half MSG rotation rate) for the next mirror half rotation.
– Every ~50sec (12,800/ rotn.) calculates difference between ‘demanded’ and measured phase (error signal) and uses this to modify power to the motor to reduce the error signal.
• Science requirements imply control to ~0.002%
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Housekeeping data
• Telemetry – 1 ‘packet’ every MSG rotation (0.6 sec) containing science &
HK.
• Mirror Error signal (GVMPERR) – Lower 12 bits of 16 giving range of ± 7.2° (greater values
wrap)– Single value for each rotation (average of 16 1 msec
samples)
• Coarse mode flag– Set to 1 if ‘error’ exceeds 14 bits (~28 °)
• Mirror Velocity (GVMVEL)• Time of start of Earth Window (SOE-SOL)
– basis of GEO
• FIFO data• others
– Mirror face, velocity feedback, fine mode, lags-leeds
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
FIFO data
• FIFO– 4096 words which can store INDUCTOSYN rotation
phase data– Downlinked as a set of 128 samples every telemetry
packet
• Modes– Snapshot
• 4096 words used to store ~1.1 complete rotations. Data transmitted to ground over 32 telemetry packets. i.e data from every 32nd rotation is down-linked. Default in SUNBLOCK mode (‘page’ defines 128 samples within 4096, 1st packet contains simultaneous recoded samples).
– Earth view• 128 samples beginning at the start of Earth view down-
linked for every mirror half rotation. Default in NORMAL mode.
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
FIFO data (2)
• SnapshotFrom 17th Jan 2003TL 4a: Rotationb: Rotation – nominal
(*1250)SOLsScanningInductosynMotor pole
• Earth viewYellow box
a
B
b
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Torque level
• GERBs 1& 2 torque commandable (0-7), level fixed– For GERB on MSG-1 has been chosen to minimise
noise in SOE-SOL (minimum at TLs 3,4)– Can be increased if any effects of increased bearing
friction are seen
• GERBs 3&4 torque level dynamic• Torque level range greater than torque spikes
measured in life test.
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Performance since launch
•GVMPERR
•Trend
•Dependent on TL
•NORMAL/ SUNBLOCK modes
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Performance since launch (2)
• GVMVEL (noise)
•dependent on TL
• Variation
•GSMCORSE
•Some association with GVMVEL (not specific)
•Worse in 2005
•autoSAFEs 2003 2004 2005
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
SCANSIG/VELSIG
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
AutoSAFE
• GERB self protection system– Controlled by on-board-limits on 32 housekeeping
parameters (one of which is GVMPERR)– Operates in NORMAL mode (not in SUNBLOCK)
• What happens in an autoSAFE– GERB on-board software detects a limit violation and
issues a SAFE command.– SAFE command stops mirror rotation and causes it to
move to the zero position.– The Quartz FILTER wheel is moved to the blocked
position (200 steps {full rot}/ sec) to protect the detector• Switch back to NORMAL mode
– Circumstances reviewed with EUMETSAT before switch on agreed and implemented
• Causes– All, so far, have been provoked by GVMPERR spikes.
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
AutoSAFE (2)
• Data loss• Limitations
– If event caused by a GVMPERR spike, mechanism recovery behaviour lost.
– GVMPERR only sampled once per S/C revolution.– QFM can take ~0.8 sec to move to BLOCKED position
• Trade-offs– Size of limits– Number of excursions
• Strategy– Non sun avoidance– Sun avoidance
• Engineering view– Keep mechanism running
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
28th Feb event
• Lead up– AutoSAFE’s had become more frequent since ~start of 2005– From Jan no. GVMPERRs set to 7 to maintain data
continuity– Mid Feb Preparations for Sun avoidance
• TL tests• Tighter limits• 1 GVMPERR• Higher TL• Shorter observing time
• AutoSAFE event on 28th– Back to NORMAL on 30th
• Lost pixels (2 open circuit, evidence for damage to further 6/8 – size of Solar image)
– Decision to stay in SUNBLOCK mode (has autoSAFE disabled mechanism running to get more data)
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
What happens? – 1st April
•Why even SUNBLOCK events don’t give us much -Also effects of timing•1st April first example of what happens - Sharpness of transition
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Palliatives
• GERBs 1 & 2• Precursors
– Nothing significant found so far
• RAL(Dave Parker) proposal to reduce response time– More than 1 check on GVMPERR per MSG rotation– Faster QFM move to BLOCKED (~0.2/~0.4sec)– Possibility of more FIFO data
• Imperial (Jenny Hanafin)– Time limits for latitude bands
• Alternative is not to run– Compromises daily/ annual time sampling
GIST 23 27th-29th Apr
Future
• GERBs 3 & 4 have a different control system, dynamic torque level
• ESA study– Revisit possibility of greased bearing
• Higher average torque but smaller spikes• Possible GERB contamination• Possible SEVIRI contamination• Complications of life test
– Other, electronic modifications