Result

Improvement of Awareness on Chemical

Security and Safety in Center for

Chemical and Packaging

Irma Rumondang 1), Eva Oktarina1), and Fatma Lestari2)

1)Center for Chemical and Packaging, Jakarta, Indonesia2)OHS University of Indonesia

Center for Chemical and Packaging (CCP) as chemical research center, under Ministry of

Indonesia, interact with chemical intensely. The lack of awareness of chemical security and

safety in CCP can be potential risk that lead to accident anytime.

Introduction

SVA

H&RM

JSA

To improve the awareness on chemical safety and security in CCP (analyst, researcher and

regulators).

Objective

CCP team use descriptive (case study) method in this research. The Security

Vulnerable Assessment (SVA) were done with SVA by American Chemicals Society

(ACS) that designed for laboratories and small chemical facilities. Hazard and risk

mapping (H&RM) done by capacity building, made laboratory map with hazard sign,

and attaching the pictogram hazard in laboratory. The Job Safety Analysis (JSA) were

done with JSA table.

Hazard and Risk Mapping

The improvement of knowledge about chemical safety were done by

doing Capacity building on chemical safety and security. The capacity

building inform analyst, researcher, and regulator about chemical safety

and security in CCP. In this capacity building attendance were: trained to

identify risk; identify hazard; identify accident; informed about Personal

Protective Equipment (PPE) and Safety Equipment Performance

Specification; build Standard Operative Procedure; and informed about

globally hazard sign. To assist this capacity building to improve safety and

security awareness in CCP, that were also part of improvement from SVA,

CCP team were: attaching Hazard and Safety Sign on Laboratory;

attaching Risk map with hazard sign on laboratory; and fulfil the PPE.

SVA H&RM JSA

Method

The results of SVA were the installation of CCTV and keyless door; the change of storage/transfer areas into hidden place from

offsite view and locked; and the training of CCP staff to recognize and assess the security vulnerability. The result of H&RM were

the training of CCP staff to recognize conditions and factors that influence the safety, and built the risk map with hazard sign and

safety apparatus for laboratories. The results of JSA were the JSA table that reflect the evaluation of risks, specify appropriate control measures,

and mitigation plan. These studies assist CCP with the goal of improving the awareness on chemical safety and security in CCP (analyst,

researcher and regulators).

Conclusion

Rak Peralatan Gelas

Rak Bahan Kimia (Powder)

Lemari

Meja petugas

Wastafel

Rak Bahan Kimia (Powder)

Rak Bahan Kimia (Powder)Rak Peralatan

Gelas

Rak Peralatan Gelas

Rak Peralatan Gelas

Lemari Bahan Corrosive

Lemari Bahan Flamable

Minyak Atsiri

Jerr

y C

an

Be

kasAsamSolven

Komputer

Pendingin

Rak

Bah

anK

imia

K

adal

uar

sa

Rak Bahan Kimia Kadaluarsa

Chemical storage layout with hazard pictogram

Attached hazard sign on laboratory

SVA

The first step in SVA is screening the chemical that were listed on COI-DHS list or that were an attractive

target for terrorist or vandals. Screening result was shown on Table 1 bellow. These chemical losses on CCP

would result in significance national impact and adjacent population. To handle those potencies, CCP has

chemical storage that was hidden from off-site view, protecting the chemicals present and quantity from the

public.

2. Hazard and Risk Mapping

1. Security Vulnerable Assessment

Discussion

Security Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) by American Chemicals Society (ACS). SVA is a systematic evaluation process in which qualitative and

quantitative techniques are applied to detect vulnerabilities and to arrive at an effectiveness level for a security system to protect specific targets from

specific adversaries and their acts. SVA by ACS includes a review of information about the facility including site security, the surrounding community,

neighbouring facilities, existing site facilities, employees, visitors/contractors, the chemicals used at the site, and how chemicals are stored & used.

SVA table analyst the security and safety aspect in laboratory, and show which point already prepared or not. The prepared point were 57% implemented.

The point that weren’t already prepared then improved. The improvement that have been done were rearrangement of chemical storage, installation of card

identification door, installation of CCTV and the labelling of waste. Prior to these improvement are capacity building on CCP staff (analyst, researcher and

regulators).

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from

Chemical Security Engagement Programs (CSP) with MoU number CSP-

8649-13. The authors would like to express their appreciation to

Ministry of Industry Indonesia and Occupational Health & Safety

Department, University of Indonesia for the cooperation in this study.

Acknowledgement

Job Safety Analysis

The Job Safety Analysis (JSA) is a systematic method for

identifying the hazard of the job, evaluate the risks and specify

appropriate control measures and or mitigation plan. Each

attendance from laboratory representative were trained to analysis

their highest risk task, describe their task step by step, and then

identified hazard and risk in each step. By filling JSA table,

attendance can identify and evaluate the hazard, risk, probability,

consequences, risk level and control for their job. These analysis

can assist attendance to build better improvement on their working

process; review and/or make their work instruction for their

Laboratory. Control were done by implement the recommendation.

3. Job Safety Analysis on Protein Distillation Process

American Chemical Society. Security vulnerability checklist for academic and small chemical laboratory facilities.Baker, G.H. A Vulnerability Assessment Methodology for Critical Infrastructure Facilities.Department of Homeland Security. 2007. 6 CFR Part 27 Appendix to Chemical Facility Anti Terrorism Standards; Final Rule.Garcia, M.L. 2001. The design and Evaluation of Physical Protection System. Jaeger, C.D. 2002. Vulnerability AssessmentMethodology for Chemical Facilities (VAM-CF). Chemical Health & Safety, November/December: 15-19.Jaeger, C.D. 2003. Chemical facility vulnerability assessment project. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 104: 207–213.Johnston, R.G. and A.R.E. Garcia. 2003. Effective Vulnerability Assessments for Physical Security Devices, Systems, andPrograms.Johnston, R.G. 2004. Adversarial safety analysis: Borrowing the methods of security vulnerability assessments. Journal ofSafety Research, 35: 245– 248.Moore, D.A., B. Fuller, M. Hazzan, and J.W. Jones. 2007. Development of a security vulnerability assessment process for theRAMCAP chemical sector. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142: 689–694.Leggett, D.J. 2012. Lab-HIRA: Hazard identification and risk analysis for the chemical research laboratory. Part 2. Riskanalysis of laboratory operations . Journal of Chemical Health & Safety, September/October: 25-36.

Refferences