implementing school performance grades superintendents small group meetings april 2013

9
Implementing School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013 Every Student READY

Upload: parker

Post on 08-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Every Student READY. Implementing School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013. Legislative Summary. Excellent Public Schools Act 2012 2013 Legislative Session SB 361 (Edition 1) ACT: Meet all 4 ACT benchmarks Weight indicators by number of students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Implementing School Performance

GradesSuperintendents Small Group

MeetingsApril 2013

Every Student READY

Page 2: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Legislative Summary

1. Excellent Public Schools Act 20122. 2013 Legislative Session

a. SB 361 (Edition 1)i. ACT: Meet all 4 ACT benchmarksii. Weight indicators by number of

studentsb. SB 361(Edition 2/PCS)

i. ACT: Meet reading/math benchmarks

c. HB435 and HB719

Page 3: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Additional Analyses: SB361

1. ACT: UNC system minimum of 17 on the composite (reading, math, English, science)

2. Simple weighting (indicators)a. Equal category weighting

i. Testing: 33.3%ii. College readiness: 33.3%iii. Graduation rate: 33.3%

b. Differential category weightingi. Testing: 43.75%ii. College readiness: 43.75%iii. Graduation rate: 12.5%

Page 4: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

A B C D F0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

173

598 573

349

175

474

921

405

54 14

Elementary and Middle School Performance Grades

SB361 HB435

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

Page 5: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

100

20091 122

206

8331

Simple Weighted Average

A B C D F0

100

200

76146

204

8522

Equal Category Weighted Average

A B C D F0

100

200

72107

206

10840

Differential Category Weighted Average Note: These are possible

weighted models that could be used with SB 361 (PCS)

Page 6: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

50

100

150

200

250

91

122

206

83

31

76

146

204

85

22

72

107

206

108

40

SimpleEqual CategoryDifferential Category

SB 361 (PCS) Weighted Options

Page 7: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

50

100

150

200

250

Number of Schools91

122

206

83

31

SB 361 PCS: Simple Weighted Average – ACT @ 17 UNC Minimum

Page 8: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

50

100

150

200

250

Number of Schools

33

94

207

154

45

SB 361 PCS: Simple Weighted Average - R/M ACT

Page 9: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Questions

Every Student READY