impacts of swc interventions and land use on discharge and...

1
Impacts of SWC interventions and land use on discharge and sediment yield in the cool sub-moist Highlands of Ethiopia Introduction Soil erosion is a serious problem for agricultural production in Ethiopia. To tackle it, communities are engaged in various soil and water conservation (SWC) and water harvesting practices. Our study aimed to evaluate the impacts of activities to manage the watershed – specifically by measuring discharge and sediment yield at plot and watershed levels. To measure runoff and sediment yield (Fig. 3) hydrological stations were installed at two sub-watersheds: one treated with SWC measures and the other without. 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Weekly total Discharge and Rainfall (mm) Weeks (first week is from August 17 to 23, 2014) Watershed With SWC (33.83 ha) Without (22.08 ha) Rainfall Parameters Watersheds With SWC Without SWC Area (Ha) 33.83 22.08 Rainfall (mm) 737.60 737.60 Discharge (m 3 /watershed) 134682.40 105933.00 Discharge (m 3 /ha) 3981.15 4797.69 Sediment Yield (ton/watershed) 31.03 102.05 Sediment Yield (ton/ha) 0.92 4.62 Results Our results from three-month’s discharge show that the total suspended sediment yield of the unmanaged sub-watershed was about three-fold compared with the managed one. Sediment yield also reduced by about 70 % due to implementation of SWC and water harvesting measures at the watershed scale. Conclusion Our results show that the soil and water conservation mobilization program achieved the intended target to reduce soil erosion and increase retention capacity of the watersheds. Integrating physical measures with biological options and supplementing these with water harvesting structures can promote their adoption. Further analysis is being done to estimate the impacts of the various interventions of soil nutrient loss and crop productivity. Figure 1. Location of the study area in the Basona Woreda of Gudoberet and Adisghe Kebeles, north Shewa, central Ethiopia Table 1. Sediment and discharge summary data Figure 6. Water yield of the study sub-watersheds Tesfaye Yaekob, Lulseged Tamene, Solomon Gebreyohanes, Solomon Seyoum, Kindu Mekonnen, Zenebe Adimassu, Kifle Woldearegay 0 100 200 300 400 Faba Bean without SWC Faba Bean with SWC Eucalyptus woodlot with SWC Grazing land Mean 231 130 123 345 207 Mean runoff (mm) 4.72 2.28 0.21 2.68 2.47 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Faba Bean without SWC Faba Bean with SWC Eucalyptus woodlot with SWC Grazing land Mean Average Sediment Conc.(SSC)(g lt -1 ) Mean Soil Loss (ton/ha) Soil Loss Average SSC (g lt-1) From 15 runoff events, the highest average runoff (345 mm) was observed on grazing land (Figure 4). Terrace with trench on cropland has reduced runoff and soil loss by 44 % and 52%, respectively (Figure 4 & 5). Figure 5. Effects of land use and management on soil loss at Gudoberet Kebele, central Ethiopia Figure 4. Runoff estimated for different land use and management at Gudoberet Kebele, central Ethiopia Both watersheds have similar characteristics and land use/cover types. Each measurement consisted of flow depth, determining instantaneous runoff discharge (Q, m 3 s −1 ) and sampling suspended sediments. Figure 3. Two small watersheds with hydrological stations Figure 2. Setup of the experimental plot at the Gudo Beret Kebele, central Ethiopia Methodology In 2014, we set up runoff plots to evaluate the effect of different land uses and SWC practices on runoff and soil loss. We evaluated three major land use/cover types (cultivated, grazing and eucalyptus woodlots) and different SWC practices (soil bunds, trenches, grass strips). Hydrologically bounded runoff plots of 22m length and 4m width were installed for each treatment (Figure 2). Tankers were fitted mid-slope to receive runoff and eroded soil collected from each plot. We measured the depth of water in both tanks every day in the morning to determine the volume of runoff. We took 500ml suspended sediment samples, oven dried at 105 0 C for 24 hours, to determine sediment concentration. Acknowledgement This research was undertaken with support from Africa RISING, a program financed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as part of the United States Government’s Feed the Future Initiative.

Upload: buicong

Post on 07-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Impacts of SWC interventions and land use on discharge and ...ciat-library.ciat.cgiar.org/Articulos_Ciat/biblioteca/Impacts_of... · to evaluate the impacts of activities to manage

Impacts of SWC interventions and land use on discharge and sediment yield in the cool sub-moist Highlands of Ethiopia

Introduction

Soil erosion is a serious problem for agricultural production in Ethiopia. To tackle it, communities are engaged in various soil and water conservation (SWC) and water harvesting practices. Our study aimed to evaluate the impacts of activities to manage the watershed – specifically by measuring discharge and sediment yield at plot and watershed levels.

To measure runoff and sediment yield (Fig. 3) hydrological stations wereinstalled at two sub-watersheds: one treated with SWC measures and theother without.

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

We

ekl

y to

tal D

isch

arge

an

d

Rai

nfa

ll (m

m)

Weeks (first week is from August 17 to 23, 2014)

Watershed With SWC (33.83 ha) Without (22.08 ha) Rainfall

Parameters Watersheds

With SWC Without SWC

Area (Ha) 33.83 22.08

Rainfall (mm) 737.60 737.60

Discharge (m3/watershed) 134682.40 105933.00

Discharge (m3/ha) 3981.15 4797.69

Sediment Yield (ton/watershed) 31.03 102.05

Sediment Yield (ton/ha) 0.92 4.62

Results

Our results from three-month’s discharge show that the total suspendedsediment yield of the unmanaged sub-watershed was about three-fold comparedwith the managed one. Sediment yield also reduced by about 70 % due toimplementation of SWC and water harvesting measures at the watershed scale.

Conclusion

Our results show that the soil and water conservation mobilization program achieved theintended target to reduce soil erosion and increase retention capacity of the watersheds.Integrating physical measures with biological options and supplementing these with waterharvesting structures can promote their adoption. Further analysis is being done to estimatethe impacts of the various interventions of soil nutrient loss and crop productivity.

Figure 1. Location of the study area in the Basona Woreda of Gudoberet and Adisghe Kebeles, north Shewa, central Ethiopia

Table 1. Sediment and discharge summary data

Figure 6. Water yield of the study sub-watersheds

Tesfaye Yaekob, Lulseged Tamene, Solomon Gebreyohanes, Solomon Seyoum, Kindu Mekonnen, Zenebe Adimassu, Kifle Woldearegay

0

100

200

300

400

Faba Beanwithout SWC

Faba Beanwith SWC

Eucalyptuswoodlot with

SWC

Grazing land Mean

231

130 123

345

207

Me

an r

un

off

(m

m)

4.72

2.28

0.21

2.68 2.47

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Faba Beanwithout SWC

Faba Bean withSWC

Eucalyptuswoodlot with

SWC

Grazing land Mean

Ave

rage

Se

dim

en

t C

on

c.(S

SC)(

g lt

-1)

Me

an S

oil

Loss

(to

n/h

a)

Soil Loss Average SSC (g lt-1)

From 15 runoff events, the highest average runoff (345 mm) was observed on grazing land (Figure 4). Terrace with trench on cropland has reduced runoff and soil loss by 44 % and 52%, respectively (Figure 4 & 5).

Figure 5. Effects of land use and management on soil loss at Gudoberet Kebele, central Ethiopia

Figure 4. Runoff estimated for different land use and management at GudoberetKebele, central Ethiopia

Both watersheds have similar characteristics and land use/cover types. Each measurement consisted of flow depth, determining instantaneous runoff discharge (Q, m3 s−1) and sampling suspended sediments. Figure 3. Two small watersheds with hydrological stations

Figure 2. Setup of the experimental plot at the GudoBeret Kebele, central Ethiopia

Methodology

In 2014, we set up runoff plots to evaluate the effect of different land usesand SWC practices on runoff and soil loss.

We evaluated three major land use/cover types(cultivated, grazing and eucalyptus woodlots)and different SWC practices (soil bunds,trenches, grass strips). Hydrologically boundedrunoff plots of 22m length and 4m width wereinstalled for each treatment (Figure 2). Tankerswere fitted mid-slope to receive runoff anderoded soil collected from each plot. Wemeasured the depth of water in both tanksevery day in the morning to determine thevolume of runoff. We took 500ml suspendedsediment samples, oven dried at 105 0C for 24hours, to determine sediment concentration.

Acknowledgement

This research was undertaken with support from Africa RISING, a program financed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as part of the United States Government’s Feed the Future Initiative.