impact evaluation

26
IMPACT EVALUATION

Upload: carlo-magno

Post on 05-Dec-2014

433 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Impact evaluation

IMPACT EVALUATION

Page 2: Impact evaluation

Purpose of Impact Evaluation

• Impact evaluation is predicated on whether programs are making a difference.

Page 3: Impact evaluation

Nature of Impact Evaluation

• IE has a strong summative emphasis in that it provides findings from which a judgment of the worth of the program can be made.

• IE are retrospective in that it logically occur at an end-point.

Page 4: Impact evaluation

Nature of Impact Evaluation

• IE are undertaken on programs which are in a mature or settled stage and have had sufficient time to have an effect.

• IE can also be administered to immature programs but the evaluator must give caution.

Page 5: Impact evaluation

IE is concerned with………………

• Determining the range and extent of outcomes of a program.

• Determining whether the program has been implemented as planned and how implementation has affected outcomes.

Page 6: Impact evaluation

• Providing evidence to funders about the extent to which resources allocated to a program have been spent wisely.

IE is concerned with………………

• Informing decisions about replication or extension of the program.

Page 7: Impact evaluation

Major concern of IE…………

• Outcomes are major concerns of IE not output.

• What are outcomes? - are benefits for participants during or after their involvement with a program. - outcomes relate to knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, behavior, condition or status.

Page 8: Impact evaluation

Major concern of IE…………

• What are outputs? - outputs are products of the program’s activities. Example: number of meals provided, classes taught etc.

• IE is concerned with establishing what works and why.

Page 9: Impact evaluation

IE is beneficial to the following…

• Stakeholders of the program• Scholars• Policy-makers

Page 10: Impact evaluation

Approaches to IE…….

• In order to determine if a program has impact, the following must be done:

- selection of key variables- setting standards- evidence

* It is the most practised form of evaluation

Page 11: Impact evaluation

Approaches to IE……….

• Objectives-based;• Needs-based;• Process-product studies; and• Performance audit

Page 12: Impact evaluation

OBJECTIVES - BASED

• Based on the judgment of whether the stated goals or objectives of the program have been met.

• These are often expressed in terms of gains in attainment of program participants

Page 13: Impact evaluation

OBJECTIVES - BASED

Main Task in setting up Objectives-based

• Determine the issue of the stakeholders.• Determine the real objectives of the program.• Determine the most appropriate way to check

if the program has led to the attainment of the goals.

Page 14: Impact evaluation

OBJECTIVES – BASED

• Select an appropriate measuring instrument, or write and trial a new instrument.

• Identify the sources of evidence.• Collect and analyze the evidence.• Draw conclusions, make judgments and

recommendation and report findings.

Page 15: Impact evaluation

NEEDS – BASED

• Determine the impact if the program meets an identifiable need.

Page 16: Impact evaluation

GOAL - FREE

• The purpose is to examine all program effects, rather than limiting the investigation to outcomes which reflect program objectives.

• Goal-free evaluations are rare.• In goal-free, one examinees both the intended

and unintended outcomes.

Page 17: Impact evaluation

PROCESS – OUTCOME

• The focus is on the actual program implementation in order to explain the process of the outcome.

• The outcome = DV; the process = IV.

Page 18: Impact evaluation

PROCESS – OUTCOME

• Standard procedure is to develop instruments to measure outcomes.

• Determine the degree to which implementation action is consistent with the intentions of the program.

• Preferred – observations by trained personnel.

Page 19: Impact evaluation

Implementation as DV

• This is done when it is more important to look at and evaluate the implementation rather than the outcome.

Page 20: Impact evaluation

PERFORMANCE AUDIT

• A custom crafted analysis of program efficiency and effectiveness. It involves the determination of the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of government organizations, activities and functions, in addition to their compliance with laws and regulations.

Page 21: Impact evaluation

PERFORMANCE AUDIT

• The actual practice of PA include:- a systematic process;- objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence;- ascertaining the degree of correspondence between assertion and established criteria.- communicating the results to interested users.

Page 22: Impact evaluation

Summary of IE…….

• Orientation- What is the worth of the program?- Justification of decisions to mount the program?- Accountability to functions and other

stakeholders.

Page 23: Impact evaluation

Summary of IE……….

• Typical Issues- has the program been implemented as

planned?- have the stated goals of the program

beenachieved?

- have the needs of those served by the program been met?

Page 24: Impact evaluation

Summary of IE………

• Typical Issues- what are the unintended outcomes?- does the implementation strategy lead to

the intended outcomes?- how do differences in the implementation

affect the program outcomes?- what are the benefits of the program given

the costs?

Page 25: Impact evaluation

Summary of IE……….

• State of program- settled

• Major focus- delivery and outcomes

• Timing - after the program has been completed

Page 26: Impact evaluation

Summary of IE………

• Key approaches- objectives based- needs based- goal free- process outcome- performance audit