immobilization of catalase in poly(isopropylacrylamide-co-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) thermally...
TRANSCRIPT
Immobilization of catalase inpoly(isopropylacrylamide- co-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) thermallyreversible hydrogelsM Yakup Arıca,1* H Avni Oktem,2 Zeki Oktem3 and S Ali Tuncel41Department of Biology, Kırıkkale University, 71450 Kırıkkale, Turkey2Department of Biological Science, Middle East Technical University, 06531 Ankara, Turkey3Department of Chemistry, Kırıkkale University, 71450 Kırıkkale, Turkey4Chemical Engineering Department, Hacettepe University, 06532 Ankara, Turkey
Abstract: Catalase was entrapped in thermally reversible poly(isopropylacrylamide-co-hydroxyethyl-
methacrylate) (pNIPAM/HEMA) copolymer hydrogels. The thermoresponsive hydrogels, in cylind-
rical geometry, were prepared in an aqueous buffer by redox polymerization. It was observed that upon
entrapment, the activity retention of catalase was decreased between 47 and 14%, and that increasing
the catalase loading of hydrogel adversely affected the activity. The kinetic behaviour of the entrapped
enzyme was investigated in a batch reactor. The apparent kinetic constant of the entrapped enzyme
was determined by the application of Michaelis±Menten model and indicated that the overall reaction
rate was controlled by the substrate diffusion rate through the hydrogel matrix. Due to the
thermoresponsive character of the hydrogel matrix, the maximum activity was achieved at 25°C with
the immobilized enzyme. The Km value for immobilized catalase (28.6mM) was higher than that of free
enzyme (16.5mM). Optimum pH was the same for both free and immobilized enzyme. Operational,
thermal and storage stabilities of the enzyme were found to increase with immobilization.
# 1999 Society of Chemical Industry
Keywords: catalase; thermo-responsive gels; hydrogels; entrapment; immobilization
INTRODUCTIONEnzymes are usually immobilized by chemical and
physical means to increase enzyme stability and enable
long term operation.1±3 Suitable matrices include
hydrogels that are highly compatible for immobiliza-
tion of enzymes due to their hydrophilic nature.
Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM) is a hydrogel
and exhibits reversible volume change in response to a
change in temperature. The thermal cycling behaviour
of these hydrogels could be used for controlling on and
off in various applications such as immobilized enzyme
reactors, controlled drug delivery systems and separa-
tion processes.4±7 pNIPAM hydrogels are known to
have a negative thermosensitivity at room tempera-
ture; increasing the temperature results in slow
deswelling that becomes rapid as the temperature
approaches the lower critical solution temperature
(LCST, �32°C). When the LSTC is reached the gel
collapses, losing most of its water content. A change in
the LCST of the gel could be achieved by addition of
different comonomers. Various thermoresponsive gels
were produced by copolymerization of NIPAM with
different acrylate based comonomers, and some of
them have been proposed as support materials for the
immobilization of enzymes and cells.6,8±12 Copoly-
merization of NIPAM with HEMA made suitable
materials for immobilization of enzymes because
their LCST values were higher than that of pure
pNIPAM.11,12 In some cases, the biotechnological and
biomedical applications of synthetic polymers may
require functional groups for coupling of enzymes and
other proteins. The derivation of plain pNIPAM
structure is usually dif®cult without losing the thermo-
sensitivity. However, the presence of hydroxyl groups
on the HEMA structure provides functional groups for
derivation of the copolymer.11,13±15 Immobilized
catalase has useful applications in the food industry
in the removal of hydrogen peroxide from food
products after cold pasteurization and in the analytical
®eld as a component of hydrogen peroxide and glucose
biosensor systems.16±19
In the present study, a series of pNIPAM/HEMA
hydrogels in cylindrical form with different NIPAM/
HEMA ratios were prepared by a redox polymeriza-
tion technique. Catalase was immobilized in thermo-
sensitive pNIPAN/HEMA hydrogels, via physical
entrapment. The effects of the NIPAM/HEMA ratio
and enzyme loading on the immobilization ef®ciency
Polymer International Polym Int 48:879±884 (1999)
* Correspondence to: M Yakup Arıca, Kırıkkale University, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, 71450 Yahsihan-Kırıkkale, Turkey(Received 9 February 1999; accepted 5 May 1999)
# 1999 Society of Chemical Industry. Polym Int 0959±8103/99/$17.50 879
and on the recovered enzyme activity were studied.
The kinetic parameters and operational, thermal and
storage stability of immobilized enzyme were investi-
gated in batch systems.
EXPERIMENTALMaterialsCatalase (CAT) (hydrogen peroxide oxidoreductase;
EC.1.11.1.6) from bovine liver (250000 unitsmgÿ1
solid) was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co (St
Louis, MO, USA) and used as received. Tetramethy-
lenediamine (TEMED) and 2-hydroxyethyl metha-
crylate (HEMA) were obtained from Sigma Chemical
Co. The latter was distilled under reduced pressure in
the presence of hydroquinone and stored at 4°C until
use. N-Isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) was obtained
from Aldrich Chemical Corporation (USA) and
recrystallized from hexane before use. Polyethylene
glycol (PEG 4000, Mn 4000), N,N-methylenebisacry-
lamide (BisAA) and potassium persulphate (KPS)
were obtained from BDH Chemicals Ltd (UK) and
used as received. All other chemicals were of reagent
grade and were purchased from Merck AG (Darm-
stadt, Germany).
Preparation of enzyme–gel cylindersCatalase immobilized pNIPAM/HEMA hydrogels in
the cylindrical form were prepared by redox polymer-
ization as previously described.11 The polymerization
was carried out in a cylindrical die (internal diameter
3.2mm, length 85mm) at �4°C under nitrogen
atmosphere for 24h. To check the effect of monomer
ratio on the catalase activity, in the initial polymeriza-
tion mixture three different NIPAM/HEMA mole
ratios were used. N-Isopropylacrylamide (115, 100 or
72mg), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (0.02, 0.04 or
0.07ml), N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (3.3mg),
potassium persulphate (5mg) and polyethylene glycol
4000 (100mg) were dissolved in phosphate buffer
(0.85ml, 0.1M, pH 6.8). The resulting mixture was
equilibrated at �4°C for 30min in a thermostatic
water bath. After this period, catalase (2mg) and
tetramethylenediamine solution (0.1ml, 10% v/v)
were added to this polymerization mixture. The
mixture was diluted to 1.5ml with the same buffer
solution and mixed. It was then transferred into three
glass dies and polymerized as described above. The
thermally reversible pNIPAM/HEMA enzyme gel
(diameter 3.2mm, length 60mm) was removed from
the die by applying pressure and cut into three lengths
of 20mm. The hydrogel cylinders were washed several
times with cold phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 6.8) and
stored at �4°C in the same buffer until use.
To test the effect of loading on the activity of the
enzyme, the above mentioned technique was used
except that the NIPAM/HEMA mole ratio (74/26)
was ®xed and the amount of catalase was varied
between 1.0 and 5.0mg in the polymerization mixture.
Activity assays of free and immobilized catalaseCatalase activity was determined spectrophotometri-
cally, by direct measurement of the decrease in the
absorbance of hydrogen peroxide at 240nm due to its
decomposition by the enzyme. Hydrogen peroxide
solutions (5±30mM) were used to determine the
activity of both the free and the immobilized enzyme.20
A 4ml aliquot of reaction mixture was preincubated
at 25°C, for 10min and the reaction was started by
adding 50ml of catalase solution (100mg solid per ml).
The decrease in absorbance at 240nm was recorded
for 5min. The rate of change in the absorbance (DA240
minÿ1) was calculated from the initial linear portion
with the help of the calibration curve (the absorbance
of hydrogen peroxide solutions of various concentra-
tions (5±30mM) at 240nm).
The same assay medium was used for the determi-
nation of the activity of the immobilized enzyme. The
enzymatic reaction was started by the introduction of
three catalase immobilized cylindrical gels (diameter
3.2mm, length 20mm) into the assay medium and was
carried out at 25°C with shaking in a water bath
equipped with a temperature control system. After
15min, the reaction was terminated by removal of the
gel cylinders from the reaction mixture. The absor-
bance of the reaction mixture was determined and the
immobilized catalase activity was calculated.
One unit of activity is de®ned as the decomposition
of 1mmol hydrogen peroxide per minute at 25°C and
pH 6.8.
These activity assays were carried out over the pH
range 4.0±8.0 and temperature range 20±60°C to
determine the pH and temperature pro®les for the free
and immobilized enzyme.
The effect of substrate concentration was tested in
the 5±30mM H2O2 concentration range. The results
of pH, temperature and substrate concentration of the
medium are presented in a normalized form, with the
highest value of each set being assigned the value of
100% activity.
Determination of immobilization efficiencyThe amount of protein in the crystalline enzyme
preparation and in the wash solution was determined
using Coomassie Brilliant Blue as described by
Bradford.21 A calibration curve constructed with
bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution (0.02±
0.2mgmlÿ1) was used in the calculation of enzyme
concentration.
Operational stability of immobilized catalase in thebatch systemThe retention of the immobilized enzyme activity was
tested as described in `Activity assays of free and
immoblized catalase'. After each reaction run, the
enzyme±hydrogel cylinders were collapsed and washed
with phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 6.8) at 35°C for
30min to remove any residual substrate within the
hydrogel matrix. They were then reintroduced into
880 Polym Int 48:879±884 (1999)
MY Arõca et al
fresh reaction medium or stored in the same fresh
buffer at 4°C until the next run.
Storage stabilityThe activity of free and entrapped catalase after
storage in phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 6.8) at 4°Cwas measured in a batch operation mode with the
experimental conditions given above.
Thermal stability of free and immobilized enzymeThe thermal stability of free and immobilized catalase
was ascertained by measuring the residual activity of
the enzyme exposed to two different temperatures (55
and 65°C) in phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 6.8) for 3h.
Every 15min three gel rods were removed and assayed
for enzymatic activity as described above. The ®rst
order inactivation rate constants, ki were calculated
from the equation
ln A � ln A0 ÿ kit �1�where A0 is the initial activity and A is the activity after
t min.
Characterization of enzyme gel cylindersThe thermoresponsive behaviour of copolymer hydro-
gels prepared with different NIPAM and HEMA ratios
was determined at various temperatures (12±40°C) in
phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 6.8) using a gravimetric
procedure described elsewhere.22 The equilibrium
swelling ratio was de®ned as the weight ratio of water
contained within the gel to dry polymer. The swelling
ratios of the gel cylinders were calculated by using the
expression
Swelling ratio�%� � f�Ws ÿW0�=W0g � 100 �2�where W0 and Ws are the weights of gel cylinders
before and after swelling, respectively.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONProperties of pNIPAM/HEMAIn this study, a copolymer gel of poly(N-isopropyla-
crylamide-co-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) (pNIPAM/
HEMA) was chosen as the support matrix. Suitable
matrices include hydrogels that are highly compatible
for immobilization of enzymes and cells due to their
hydrophilic nature and high water content to provide
the enzymes with a microenvironment similar to that
in vivo.
The copolymerization of NIPAM with HEMA in
the presence of PEG 4000 as a diluent improved the
hydrogel properties such as crack formation, and
disintegration in the hydrogel structure during swel-
ling and deswelling periods was not observed.
The effect of NIPAM/HEMA mole ratio on the
immobilization ef®ciency, recovered activity and
swelling ratio are presented in Table 1. It was observed
that immobilization was very ef®cient and more than
84% of the enzyme that was added in the polymeriza-
tion mixture was retained. Another observation was
that as the ratio of comonomer (HEMA) increased in
the initial polymerization mixture, the recovered
activity of the catalase was adversely affected. Figure
1 shows the swelling pro®le of the three different
hydrogels. Varying the comonomer ratios results in
signi®cantly different swelling pro®les mainly before
the LCST region. It is also observed that the swelling
ratio of the hydrogel decreased as the ratio of
comonomer (HEMA) in the initial polymerization
mixture increased.
Immobilization and retention of activityThe effect of loading on the activity of catalase
entrapped in pNIPAM/HEMA hydrogel cylinders
was determined by varying the enzyme contents within
the hydrogel cylinders. As presented in Fig 2, the
highest retention of enzyme activity (47%) was
Table 1. Effect of hydrogel compositionon swelling ratio, immobilizationefficiency and recovered activity
Hydrogel
composition
Monomer ratio
NIPAM/HEMA
(mol/mol)
Swelling ratio
(at 25°C)
Immobilization
ef®ciency
(%)
Recovered
activity
(%)
PNIPAM/HEMA1 85/15 6.75 84 37
PNIPAM/HEMA2 74/26 5.2 91 28
PNIPAM/HEMA3 53/47 4.5 97 19
Figure 1. Swelling ratio of pNIPAM/HEMA cylinders as a function oftemperature.
Polym Int 48:879±884 (1999) 881
Immobilization of catalase in pNIPAM/HEMA hydrogels
obtained with the lowest enzyme loading (0.33mg) per
ml of gel. As the enzyme content increased (from 0.33
to 3.33mg per ml of gel), retention of activity
decreased, dropping to a minimum of 14%. A high
enzyme load in the support generally leads to a low
retained activity. This is brought about by over-
saturation of the pore space of the matrix with the
enzyme, as a result of which substrate diffusion is
restricted. With an increase in catalase loading in the
hydrogel cylinders (0.33±3.33mg per ml of gel), the
enzyme activity was also increased (33.6�103 to
110.7�103U per ml of pNIPAM/HEMA hydrogel),
but not at the same rate because of the loss in retained
activity with increased load (Fig 2). As presented in
Table 1, pNIPAM/HEMA2 hydrogel composition
with a loading of 1.3mg enzyme per ml of hydrogel
was found to be optimum and it was used in the rest of
the study.
Kinetic parameters, Michaelis constant Km and
Vmax for free and immobilized catalase, were deter-
mined by varying the concentration of hydrogen
peroxide in the reaction medium. The kinetic proper-
ties of free and immobilized enzymes are presented in
Table 2. For free enzyme Km was found to be
16.5mM, whereas the Vmax value was calculated as
236�103U per mg of protein. Kinetic constants of the
immobilized catalase were also determined in the
batch system. The Km value was found to be 28.6mM.
The Vmax value of immobilized enzyme was estimated
from the data as 84�103U per ml of hydrogel. As
expected, the Km and Vmax values were signi®cantly
affected after entrapment within pNIPAM/HEMA2
hydrogel. The change in the af®nity of the enzyme to
its substrate is probably caused by structural changes
in the enzyme introduced by the immobilization
procedure or by lower accessibility of the substrate to
the active site of the immobilized enzyme.
Effect of temperature on catalytic activityThe temperature dependence of the activities of the
soluble and immobilized catalase were studied in
phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 6.8) in the temperature
range 20±60°C (Fig 3). The optimum temperature for
the immobilized catalase was at 25°C, which was
15°C lower than that of free enzyme. The temperature
pro®le of the immobilized enzyme showed a steep
increase and decrease around optimum activity due to
the thermally reversible behaviour of the carrier
hydrogel. At low temperature, the hydrogel was in
the swollen state and the pores of the hydrogel were
very open. Therefore, the effective diffusion coef®cient
of substrate was higher due to lower internal mass
transfer resistance. The available surface area for the
substrate diffusion was also higher due to the swollen
gel volume. These two factors provided a higher rate of
substrate diffusion through the hydrogel carrier
according to Fick's law, while the immobilized enzyme
activity was controlled kinetically at low temperature.
Figure 2. Effect of enzyme loading on the entrapped enzyme activityretention and enzyme–hydrogel activity.
Table 2. Properties of free andimmobilized catalase
Form of enzyme
Vmax
(U�10ÿ3mgÿ1 enzyme)
Km
(mM)
Recovered
activity
(%)
Activity
(U�10ÿ3ml gel)
Free catalase 236 16.5 100 ±
Immobilized catalase
(PNIPAM/HEMA2)
65 28.6 28 84
Figure 3. Temperature profiles of free and immobilized catalase.
882 Polym Int 48:879±884 (1999)
MY Arõca et al
As presented in Fig 1, increasing the temperature
caused deswelling of the matrix and then reduced the
activity of the enzyme at 25°C. This reduction of
activity as a response to deswelling can be due to
mechanical pressure of the shrunken network on the
enzyme, or to a reduction in diffusion of the substrate
through the deswollen hydrogel, and also to a decrease
in the surface area for substrate diffusion with
shrinking of the hydrogel volume. At 25°C, the
kinetics and above mentioned factors should be
balanced, yielding a maximum enzyme activity for
the enzyme±hydrogel system. Thus, the temperature
dependent activity of immobilized enzyme is opposite
to that of free enzyme which exhibits higher activity at
higher temperature. Similar observations have also
been reported for other thermally reversible hydrogel
carriers.4,11,12
Effect of pH on enzyme activityThe effect of pH on the activity of free and
immobilized catalase for hydrogen peroxide degrada-
tion was studied at various pH values at 35°C. The
reactions were carried out in acetate and phosphate
buffers and the results are presented in Fig 4. The
immobilized enzyme system has the same optimum as
the free enzyme (around pH 7.0). The free enzyme
gave a signi®cantly broader pro®le in the acidic region
(between pH 4.0 and 6.0) than the immobilized
enzyme. The pH pro®le of the immobilized enzyme
was slightly broader in the alkaline region with respect
to the free enzyme. These results are possibly due to
secondary interactions (eg ionic and polar interactions,
hydrogen bonding) between the enzyme and the
hydrogel carrier. Other researchers have reported
Figure 5. Operational stability of immobilized catalase in a batch system.
Figure 4. pH profiles of free and immobilized catalase. Figure 6. Influence of temperature on the stability of free and immobilizedcatalase.
Figure 7. Storage stability of free and immobilized catalase.
Polym Int 48:879±884 (1999) 883
Immobilization of catalase in pNIPAM/HEMA hydrogels
similar observations upon immobilization of catalase
and other enzymes.13,23±25
Operational stability of immobilized catalase in abatch systemOperational stability of the immobilized catalase was
determined for 20 successive batch reactions at 25°Cfor 2h. The initial hydrogen peroxide concentration
was 10mM in phosphate buffer (pH 6.8, 0.1M). The
results presented in Fig 5 shows that the immobilized
enzyme activity remained almost the same as the
original activity after six cycles. After that, a steady
decrease in degradation capability of the immobilized
catalase was observed, and this loss reached 42% after
20 cycles of batch operation. Because catalase is stable
at 25°C, the loss in the immobilized enzyme activity
during batch operation is not thermal deactivation but
could result from poisoning brought about by the
substrate.
Thermal stabilityThe effect of temperature on the stability of free and
immobilized enzyme is shown in Fig 6. At 55°C, the
free enzyme lost all its initial activity after a 240min
incubation period, while the immobilized catalase
showed signi®cant resistance to thermal inactivation
(retaining about 38% of its initial activity after the
same period). At 65°C free and immobilized catalase
lost all of their initial activity after 120min and
210min, respectively. The thermal inactivation rate
constants for free and immobilized preparation at
65°C were calculated as ki(free) 1.73�10ÿ2minÿ1 and
ki(immobilized) 9.84�10ÿ3minÿ1, respectively. These
results suggest that the thermostability of immobilized
catalase becomes signi®cantly higher at higher tem-
perature. If the heat stability of enzymes increased
upon immobilization, the potential application of
these enzymes would be extended. Increased thermal
stability has been reported for a number of immobi-
lized enzymes, and the polymer network is supposed to
preserve the tertiary structure of enzyme. In addition,
it has also been reported that hydrogel carriers such as
Sephadex, Sepharose, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacry-
late) and poly(acrylamide) protect enzymes from
thermal inactivation and yield higher thermal stabi-
lities.20,26 On the basis of these observations,
pNIPAM/HEMA2 is a hydrophilic network which
induces higher thermal stability compared to that of its
free counterpart.
Storage stabilityFree and immobilized catalase preparations were
stored in phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 6.8) at 4°Cand the activity of the enzymes was determined
weekly. The activity measurements were carried out
for a period of 70 days (Fig 7). The free enzyme lost all
its activity within 20 days whereas the immobilized
enzyme lost about 17% of its activity during the same
period, and about 78% after 70 days. The decrease in
activity was explained as a time-dependent natural loss
in enzyme activity, and this was prevented to a
signi®cant degree by immobilization.
CONCLUSIONSCatalase immobilized thermally reversible pNIPAM/
HEMA hydrogels have been prepared by redox
polymerization. The swelling capacity of the hydrogels
can be adjusted by changing the NIPAM/HEMA mole
ratio in the initial polymerization mixture. As pre-
viously mentioned, controlling and changing the
immobilized enzyme activity could be achieved by
regulating the temperature because the hydrogel
response to temperature is reversible. The enzyme±
hydrogels could be used many times without any
deformation during swelling and deswelling cycles.
Immobilization of guest biomolecules in thermally
reversible hydrogel networks provides the design for a
system that produces the required response at a given
temperature.
REFERENCES1 Kennedy JF and Paterson M, Polym Int 32:71 (1993).
2 Arõca MY, AlaeddinogÏlu NG and Hasõrcõ V, Enzyme Microb
Technol 22:152 (1998).
3 Arõca MY, Denizli A, Baran T and Hasõrcõ V, Polym Int 46:345
(1998).
4 Park TG and Hoffman AS, J Biomed Mater Res 24:21 (1990).
5 Bae YH, Okana T, Hsu R and Kim SW, Macromol Chem Rapid
Commun 8:481 (1987).
6 Han J, Park CH and Ruan R, Biotechnol Lett 17:851 (1995).
7 Kayaman N, Kazan D, Erarslan A, Okay O and Baysal BM, J
Appl Polym Sci 67:805 (1998).
8 Chen G and Hoffman AS, Nature 373:49 (1995).
9 Kokufuda E, Zhang YQ and Tanaka T, Nature 351:302 (1991).
10 Park TG and Hoffman AS, Biotechnol Bioeng 35:152 (1990).
11 Tuncel A, J Biotechnol 63:41 (1998).
12 Bayhan M and Tuncel A, J Appl Polym Sci 67:1127 (1998).
13 Arõca MY and Hasõrcõ V, J Chem Tech Biotechnol 58:287 (1993).
14 Arõca MY and Hasõrcõ V, J Chem Tech Biotechnol 58:281 (1993).
15 Arõca MY, Hasõrcõ V and AlaeddinogÏlu NG Biomaterials 16:761
(1995).
16 Piedade AP, Gil MH, Cavaco MC and Andrade ME, Polym Int
38:269 (1995).
17 Vasudevan PT and Thakur DS, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 49:173
(1994).
18 Puis THS, Leypoldt JK and Gough DA, Biotechnol Bioeng
29:696 (1987).
19 Tarhan L, Biomed Biochim Acta 49:307 (1990).
20 Arica MY, Denizli A, Salih B, PisËkin E and Hasõrcõ V, J Membr
Sci 129:65 (1997).
21 Bradford MM, Anal Biochem 72:248 (1976).
22 Arõca MY and Hasõrcõ V, Polym Int 32:177 (1993).
23 Carrare CR and Rubiolo CA, Bitechnol Prog 10:220 (1994).
24 Khare SK and Gupta MN, Biotechnol Bioeng 31:829 (1988).
25 Arica MY and Hasõrcõ V, Biomaterials 8:489 (1987).
26 Uhlich T, Ulbricht M and Tomaschewski G, Enz Microb Technol
19:121 (1996).
884 Polym Int 48:879±884 (1999)
MY Arõca et al