iiiiiiiiiiiiiu mohheeemhhhhhi mhhhmmhhhhml · u ( important meroplankton of the lower chesapeake...

231
AD-AL65 341 IMPORTANT EROPLRNKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND 13 PROPOSED NORFOLK .. (U) OLD DOMINION UNIV NORFOLK VR APPLIED MARINE RESEARCH LAB A J BUTT ET AL. MR S UNCLASSIFIED DRCU65-81-C-51 F/O 8/1 NL Iolllllllllmml mhmmhhhhhhhhhu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml IIIIIIIIIIIIIu

Upload: others

Post on 30-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

AD-AL65 341 IMPORTANT EROPLRNKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND 13PROPOSED NORFOLK .. (U) OLD DOMINION UNIV NORFOLK VRAPPLIED MARINE RESEARCH LAB A J BUTT ET AL. MR S

UNCLASSIFIED DRCU65-81-C-51 F/O 8/1 NLIolllllllllmml

mhmmhhhhhhhhhumohhEEEmhhhhhImhhhmmhhhhml

IIIIIIIIIIIIIu

Page 2: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

MOM

;"

I

I.", ..

.

32..

1. 28 2•

L. .3.

-I

mAj L n

b,

T, ":-,

-

,-u J.

%-

likI 1 1 .0 12.0i

I-

MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART1'" " " " " "'. N"AI'" 1 , .. . . A

.'. A.-

I %

Nfi

Page 3: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

T APPLIED MARINE RESEARCH LABORATORY___ OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY

00 NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

U IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE( LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSEDi NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE.

II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON

By

C/) Arthur J. ButtLU Raymnond W. Alden IIIr'00 Robert J. Young, Jr.

LU

Final ReportFor the period ending December 1984 DIz DETC

SMAR11 11986

zPrepared for the *Do Department of the ArmyNorfolk District, Corps of EngineersBFort Norfolk, 803 Front StreetNorfolk, Virginia 23510

2 Uner ~Contract DACW6581C0051 1 ~II NSAE Efjcw Work Order No. 16 Aptoe t ubio iiflOGIVI

US Army CorpsOf EngineersNorfolk District

Report El- 51

March 1985

86 3 11 013~

Page 4: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEIa. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION lb. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS

Unclassified________________________

2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILASIUTY OF REPORT

unlimited. L4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)

6a. NAME OF PERFORMIN4G ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATIONOld Dominion University, Applie (If appicable) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Marine Research Laboratory Norfolk District6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code)

Nrok VA258Norfolk. Vir2inia 23510-1096 1Ba. NAME OF FUNDINGI/SPONSORING B b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

*ORGANIZATION U.S. Army Corps if aPAC&of Engineers, Norfolk District NAOPL; NAOIEN DACW65-81-C-0051

Sc. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERSPROGRAM PROJECT ITASK ~ WORK UNITELEMENT NO. NO. INO. ACCESSION NO.

Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096 III?. TITLE (Include Security QaIAciafln)Important Meroplankton of the Lower Chesapeake Bay and Proposed Norfolk Disposal Site.II: Crustaeceans and Icthvonlankton12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)

Butt, A.J., R.W. Alden. III and R.J. Young.

Jr.

Final IFROM _____TO ____ 1985. March I 21916. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION

17. COSATI CODES 18. SUBJECT TERA-.. (Continue on revers if necessary and identify by block numbed)FIELD GROUP SUS-GROUP lowerChspaeBymeolntnabdncaayicmu-

ity structure, larval recruitment, fishes, crustaceans,

!9. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if npcesuary an idenrtify by blOck number)Meroplankton which move through the area in ecological significant numbers are: blue crablarvae, Bay anchovy larvae, bivalve veligers, polychaete larvae, larvaceans, and the sand

* shrimp larvae.

20. OISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASS IFICATIONOUNCLASSIFIEWiUNLIMITED M SAME AS RPT. 0 DTIC USERS Unclassified

* 22a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 22b. TELEPHONE (include Area Code) 122c. OFFICE SYMBOLCraig L. Seltzer (804) 441-3767/827-37671 NAOPL-R

00D FORM 1473,84 MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exhausted. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF TH4IS PAGEAll other edition% are obsolete.

Unclassified

Page 5: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

•~~~- -,.Z...-r--.

APPLIED MARINE RESEARCH LABORATORY

OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THELOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSEDNORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE.

., II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON

By

Arthur J. ButtRaymond W. Alden IIIRobert J. Young, Jr.

Final ReportFor the period ending December 1984

#"p

:-'"A I'? 1-.-6,Dina epart of.the-Army".TNorfl Distprict, Corpsg ofengneers1

Fort Norfolk, 803 Front Street S 1 ~Norfolk, Virginia 23510

UnderContract DACW65-81-C-0051Work Order No. 16

Submitted by theOld Dominion University Research FoundationP.O. Box 6369Norfolk, Virginia 23508

010- N STAT EMEN A&kpptowed tot pubho t6I0024

March 1985 --------~ ujini

Ae" •°.

Page 6: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PA G E,SECTION PG

INTRODUCTION............................................. 1

The Zooplankton Community - A Review.....................3

METHODS........................................................6

Study Area ................................... 6Sampling Regime....................................... 7Abundance (Statistical) Analysis.........................10

RESULTS................ ............................ 11

Community Structure......................................12

-'DISCUSSION.....................................................24

Larval Recruitment.......................................24.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .................................. 29

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................... 30

REFERENCES.....................................................31

APPENDICES (with List of Figures and List of Tables) .... 36

Figures..................................................39Tables...................................................91 -1,

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE

*1 Study area off Virginia Beach, Virginia..................8

.1ok

Page 7: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE

1 Larval decapod crustaceans collected from the LowerChesapeake Bay and Norfolk Disposal Site during1982 and 1983 ........................................ 13

2 Larval fishes collected from the Lower Chesapeake Bayand Norfolk Disposal Sites during 1982-1983 .......... 21

Av. . I

-,-.- .°. .-

-.42

-rU : ;.i""'r:NT~q ,- . -L

'4 .- . . - . .)

Di3 rb_'r , , •". .

A 1t ii .",-.-,.

I °" * ' - "

iiR,°°'"h1..1.'.'-,.-.','J-',.'-.,-,--... .. -, ...-. .'L "" " . . "" "''''"'''" ''.' "•".".''', " ':'" " " " ' -' " "' " " "" " "V". "-"" :"'A

Page 8: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWERCHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE.

II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON

By*Arthur J. Butt, **Raymond W. Alden III,

and ***Robert J. Young, Jr.

INTRODUCTION .

Estuaries serve as a major interface between the upland

river drainage and ocean exchange. This ecological zone is unique

in its capacity to act as a high nutrient trap, resulting in an

ideal nursery for numerous larval and juvenile forms, as well as a

suitable habitat for adult foraging. However, dredging and chan-

nelization operations can adversely affect the estuarine resources

in a variety of ways. Open ocean disposal may be the most

economical and widely used disposal method. Some influences are

immediate, while others are more sublte, and may persist over the

long-term, but are no less severe. Those species that frequent "-

the estuary may be impacted.

Dredged materials are reported to affect the larvae of many

aquatic forms. An associated bioaccumulation of toxic organics

*Manager, Applied Marine Research Laboratory, Old Dominion

University, Norfolk, VA.

**Director, Applied Marine Research Laboratory, Old Dominion

University, Norfolk, VA.

***Research Assistant, Applied Marine Research Laboratory, OldDominion University, Norfolk, VA.

.. •. •.. -...o

Page 9: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

!'7

and inorganics from resuspension of contaminated sediments may

occur. Growth inhibition and lack of resistence to stress are

noticeable responses. Short-term physiological alterations

associated with dredging often decrease the general fitness of

fishes during the critical larval development (Bell, 1973).

Interferences with migrating species are also noted (Thompson,

1973). Vision may be impaired and olfactory cues are often masked

due to suspended silts. These physiological functions are

important to both prey and predatory species.

It is well documented that zooplankton play an important

role in the transfer of energy through the aquatic food chain.

Zooplankton populations also include larvae and reproductive

stages of many benthic and nektonic species that have significant

commercial values many of these species use the Chesapeake Bay as

a nursery area. Therefore, their larval stages represent poten-

tial resources which must be considered in environmental .

assessments of man's activities. These factors, therefore, make

the studies of zooplankton population dynamics of particular

interest when investigating environmental perturbations such as

dredging operations and open water disposal.

The present study was designed to provide a descriptive

assessment of the zooplankton community, in particular, the

meroplankton and ichthyoplankton of the Hampton Roads, lower

Chesapeake Bay, and Norfolk Disposal Sites (NDS). Stations . -

representative of the dredging and open-ocean disposal sites were

sampled with respect to dominant species, ecological associations,

* spatial and temporal abundances and diversity.

2 - . .•.-"-. . . . . . . . . . . .

. 4 ..- ,

Page 10: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

The Zooplankton Community - A Review ,.4

The zooplankton community is a complex assemblage of ,

organisms. The term plankton applies to both plants W- W'

(phytoplankton) and animals (zooplankton) that passively drift

with water movements. This definition may be an oversimplifica- -

tion since many forms actively migrate in the vertical and/or

horizontal planes in varying degrees. Typically, zooplankton

classifications are reduced to encompass the proportion of time an

organism's life history stage may be spent in the planktonic 4 .

community. The holoplankton include animals such as copepods

which characteristically spend their entire life cycle in the

water column. Animals that have only a portion of their life in

the plankton are termed meroplankton. They are typified by the

larvae and early postlarval stages of many decapod crustaceans,

molluscs, polychaetes and fish. A third grouping is the

tychoplankton, or "accidental" plankton, including many benthic -

forms which are swept into a planktonic mode via tidal and wind

currents. This group also may include organisms that are active

in the water column due to some behavioral or migrating pattern

such as swarming (e.g., certain polychaetes and shrimps) (Dauer et

al., 1980).

A review of the literature yields a paucity of information

on the general composition, abundance and seasonal ity of

zooplankton in the lower Chesapeake Bay proper (Atkinson, 1973;

Browne, 1974; Crandall, 1974; Jacobs, 1978; Grant & Olney, 1979).

In general, the studies show domination of the zooplankton

community by a few major forms such as copepods. The few specific

3

* 22 . -. .< j~aA~at~ ~ . ° -

Page 11: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

planktonic groups examined in the lower Chesapeake Bay and

surrounding estuaries were largely limited to individual species,

their life cycles, distribution or general ecology. Examples

include: decapod larvae (Sand ifer, 1972, 1973, 1975; Goy, 1976),

bivalve larvae (Chanley and Andrews, 1971), cladocerans (Bryan and

Grant, 1973; Bryan, 1974, 1977, 1979, 1983; Gilchrist, 1979),

chaetognaths (Grant, 1963, 1977), polychaete larvae (Orth, 1971),

and coelenterates (Calder, 1971; Feigenbaum and Kelly, 1982).

Grant (1977) and Jacobs (1977) both reported two definable,

seasonal zooplankton populations in the lower Chesapeake Bay. A

winter-spring community typically occurred with peak abundances o F

holoplankton around February or March. The summer-fall assemblage

was far more diverse due to the presence of meroplankton, more

specifically, fish eggs and larvae and decapod crustacean larvae.

Their principal reproductive periods are reported from June

through August and peak around August (Goy, 1976; Olney, 1978).

Recent evaluations of benthic communities in stressed

environments have become the focus of major environmental

assessment studies. In conjunction with the benthic studies,

increased interest in life history studies of many aquatic forms

has occurred, including commercially important shellfish and fish -

species that feed on benthic forms. As a result, the meroplankton

have received increasing attention, but again, only within

ki specific taxonomic groups (Morgan, 1980; McConaugha and

Provenzano, 1980; Johnson, 1981; Provenzano et al., 1983; Olney,

1983). It is unfortunate that studies of larval fishes have been .-.

neglected in most surveys.

4 a

Page 12: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

The present study overlaps a portion of the geographic --.--

coverage of a few of the earlier studies mentioned previously;

however, it encompasses a much broader view of the community

structure which has been previously overlooked. This report

represents an overview of spatial-temporal patterns of species of

commercial interest, as well as a characterization of communities

of numerically important organisms comprising the meroplankton of

the Bay ecotone.

5-. -.

b - ;-.

-5 .

-----. .. . -. -- ~ .- . - --. , ~ -~ * .. 1 ~ * ~ ~ - ~ - - -.- . ;- .

Page 13: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- --- - .V- . 0 7-7-w.ol .

METHODS

Study Area

Chesapeake Bay represents the drowned river valley of the

pleistocene-incised Susquehana River Val ley (Ludwick, 1972). It

is classified as moderately stratified with semi-diurnal tides

(Pritchard, 1967). Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries constitute

the largest estuary in the United States. The two southernmost

tributaries of the Bay are the James and Elizabeth Rivers. In

recent years, both have received increased environmental attention

due to industrial pollutants reported throughout their systems.

This study was conducted in the Hampton Roads area (lower James

River - Elizabeth River confluence), the lower Chesapeake Bay and -.

the adjacent continental shelf.

The Chesapeake Bay mouth measures 15 km between Cape Henry

and Cape Charles, and varies in depth from 4m in shoal areas to

14m in the three navigation channels. The circulation of the

Chesapeake Bay mouth has a two-layer flow pattern. There is a net

)utflow of less dense, low salinity surface water layered over a " .

* net inflow of more dense, higher salinity bottom water (Pritchard,

1955; Boicourt, 1981). Inflow of shelf water occurs in the lower

layer of the Chesapeake Channel and at the northern side of the

North Channel. The location of major fresh water sources on the

Western shore of the Bay combines with the Coriolis force to

confine the more saline water from the shelf to the eastern side

of the Bay (Boicourt, 1973) The Coriolis effect is also

evidenced by a slanted pycnocline that may intersect the surface _

near the northern channel.

-, 6

~~~~~~.'. ..."..'..'................. .................................-. _...'..._.. ._. '*.p'.. .. ",-, , , . , , .., .. , -, . .._ . .. . , ._ . .. . .. , .. . .. . . .. ... . ...'...__.. .. _. . .. . . .. ....*.. . . . .-

Page 14: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

jjVind strength and direction can have a strong influence on

water flowing out of the Bay. Outflowing surface water from the

Bay travels toward the south as a pronounced low salinity plume.

It is influenced by both the Coriolis effect (Boicourt, 1973,

1981; Johnson, 1976) and the general southerly drift of the shelf

water off the Chesapeake Bay region of the Middle Atlantic Bight

' (Bumpus, 1973). However, inshore at the Bay mouth/continental

shelf interface, the flow pattern becomes much more dynamic due to

the synergistic interactions of wind, vertical decoupling at the SL

pycnocline and tidal prism patterns (Boicourt and Hacker, 1976;

Boicourt, 1981; Johnson et al., 1983).

. Sampling Regime

A total of eleven (11) stations were selected to monitor

baseline conditions prior to the proposed deepening of navigation

* channels in Hampton Roads and the lower Chesapeake Bay and the

* associated open ocean disposal site (Fig. 1) Three of the

stations were located in the mouths of the James and Elizabeth

. Rivers and their confluence (Stations 5, 6, and 7). The Thimble

. Shoals and Chesapeake Bay navigation channels were sampled with a

four station transect (Stations 1, 2, 4 and 10), while three

additional stations were distributed across the channels of the

- middle and upper Chesapeake Bay mouth (3, 8 and 9). The last

station designated the Norfolk Disposal Site (NDS) was placed in

• the middle of the proposed dredged material disposal site. This

*" station was approximately 27 km east of the Bay mouth.

7

. . . . . . . ...

Page 15: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

IIN

ww

z 5;

LU,

U,4

(

amO

CLc

S- L

zz

ww

CC

L.-

4. I.

LI* to z

0~0

Page 16: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Monthly samples were scheduled for the Bay mouth (Stations

8, 9 and 10) and NDS stations in order to monitor the two-

definable seasonal zooplankton communities. A winter versus

summer seasonal sampling regime was maintained for the inner most

stations 4, 5, 6 and 7) with monthly sampling conducted from -

October through April and semi-monthly sampling made from May

through September during the more active reproductive periods.

Due to the major volume of water exchange in and around the

Thimble Shoal Chesapeake Channels, Stations 1, 2, and 3 were

sampled year-round on a semi-monthly schedule.

The plankton samples were collected with oblique, bongo tows

from approximately one meter above the bottom to the surface. An .-'-.

identical second tow was performed. A duplicate sequence of tows

was performed with a different mesh net producing a total of

I eight oblique tows per station. The two mesh sizes were 153P and

355u . In addition, the top 12-15 cm of the sea surface was

sampled with a one-meter neuston net. These two tow types sampled

identical cross-sectional areas and were made with the 353u mesh.

They were taken at Stations 8, 9, 10 and NDS. Four neuston tows

were made per station for five minutes each. Calibrated mechani-

cal flowmeters were used in each net to calculate relative

abundance per volume.

Ancillary data was collected at each station and during all

sampling months. Such data included temperature, salinity,

conductivity, and dissolved oxygen (DO) readings taken one meter

below the surface and one meter above the bottom. The Beckman RS-

5 induction salinometer was used for all physical data collection

except DO which employed an air cal ibrated YSI probe.

9

. . . . . . . *.. .- p * * *. . *- *.*.-..

Page 17: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Measurements of phytoplankton standing crop were also taken

(Marshall and Alden, 1985).

The samples were fixed with 7% buffered formaldehyde and

transported to the laboratory for sorting. The CVS subsampling

method was employed using sieve fractions of 20001, 8501, 600P,

and 350P, (Alden et al., 1982). Identifications and enumerations

of meroplankton, ichthyoplankton and tycoplankton were made.

Abundance (Statistical) Analysis

Species selections were based on either numerical or

commercial importance. The a priori criteria for "numerical

important" groups was based on abundance estimates of 10/m 3 in at

least 5% of the observations. Commercially important groups were -.-'-

selected for species represented by the local commercial and

recreational fisheries.

%

-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . * . . * . . . * .* . ., . - . . . . *•*. .. *.

* -. " -".

Page 18: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-. .' - 2. A.. ,- -. ,.- -- ,

RESULTS

4. * '.1,.- .

Over 240 life stages of diverse taxa were examined in the

meroplankton collections taken from the lower Chesapeake Bay and . .

NDS. A detailed list of the species is provided (Table Al). A

*' summary of statistics for each taxonomic group in any given tow _____

- type/station combination is included (Table A2). The taxonomic

-. groups considered "numerically important" along with site/tow type

combination information is given in Table A3. The grand means for

each site/tow type are presented for comparison purposes. Twenty

taxonomic groups met the criteria: (in alphabetical order) bivalve

larvae, Callianassa spp., Callinectes sapidus zoeae and megalopae,

Cancer irroratus zoeae, Crangon septemspinosa larvae, Engraulidae

fish eggs (Anchoa mitchilli?), unidentified fish eggs, gastropod

larvae, larvaceans, Lucifer faxoni, Mysidopsis bigelowi, Neomysis

americana, Pagurus spp. zoeae, phoronids, Pinnixa spp. zoeae,

Pinnotheres spp. zoeae, Sciaenidae fish eggs, Uca (minax?) sp.

zoeae, Upogebia affinis larvae, and xanthid larvae.

Certain of the groups were not truly meroplankton (e.g.

larvaceans, phoronids, Lucifer faxoni and mysids). However, their

occurrences were included because of their ecological role in the -

overall community structure of the study area.

A closer examination of potential commercially important

groups in the region were added to the list. Most of the larvae

were ichthyoplankton and included the following larval species:

Bothus ocellatus, Etropus microstomus, Paralichthys dentalus,

Scophthalmus aquosus, Trinectes macalatus, Cynoscion regalls,

Leiostomus xanthurus, Micropogonias undulatus, Pomatomus saltatrix

11. ,."" ",

-.* -,.'/,F_/. ".:.:,* '. .-. '." -'" . . ".I I > * - ~ *~~ . . . * .

Page 19: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

and Brevoortla tyrannus. Ammodytes hexapterus was included

because of its importance as food for other fish in the region. _,_'_

Bothid, sciaenid and other fish eggs were also included for

comparative purposes.

Important taxonomic groups were assembled so that similar

taxa would be found together (Table A3). The means and standard

errors are presented only for cruises where there are at least one

non-zero abundance value. The mean abundances of the groups at

the various sites over time are presented for both oblique and

neuston tows (when applicable) (Figs. Al to A51)• Fish species ,

with trace levels less than .05/m 3 were not included in tables or

*~ figures.

Results of blue crab, rock crab and oyster larvae abundances

were detailed in another report and are not included (Butt et al.,

1985). Similar taxonomic groups were discussed for ease of

presentation. The most common and/or most abundant species are

initially presented followed by less dominant (or subordinate)

forms. .-.. .

" , . -" *

Community Structure

Eleven noncommercial decapod crustaceans were presented as

"numerically important" from over fifty (50) different crustacean

identified during the study period (Table 1). Among the

meroplankton the larvae of the mud shrimp Upogebia affinis were

found throughout the lower Bay and Bay mouth stations in moderate

numbers (Table A2). However, highest concentrations were reported

along the inner Thimble Shoal Channel stations (2, 4 and 5) and

12

.. .. .* *. ,*" - . . . . . .- .°.. . . . . . . .

. . . ...--- .'-+ ' . . . . C.-"--'" '"-""-" ." . +'"-'"-" -"-" -" "-"- -"

- *' -" "-" +• "- .'. . ." -. . -" . ." """ -."-_ _ ,._ ,'_'__ _ __ _ __'. '.+C . .'.+..+" ' "C"" "" " """ " , ... ,,, .' " ., ' . . "..,'* , '. ..-. ,.'"*.A.+. ,. ,- ' ,t' +. "

Page 20: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

TABLE 1

LARVAL DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS COLLECTED FROMTHE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE

DURING 1982 AND 1983

Class Crustacea 4.9%

Subclass MalacostracaOrder Decapoda

Suborder NatantiaSection Penaeidae

Family SergestidaeLucifer faxoniAcetes americanus

-' Family PenaeidaeTrachyenaeus constrictus

Section CarideaFamily Palaernonidae

Paleomonetes spp.

Family AlpheidaeAlpheus normanfli -V.Ar-Neterochaelis

Family OgyridaeOgyrides limicola

Family HippolytidaeHippolyte Pleuracantha

Family CrangonidaeCrangon septemspinosa

Suborder ReptantiaSection Macrura

Family Callianassidaek.L4Callianassa ACallianassa BCallanassa C

Family UpogebiidaeUpogebia affinis

Family LaomediidaeNaushonla crangonoides

13

!67.

Page 21: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

47-

TABLE 1(Continued)

Section AnomuraFamily Porcellanidae

EuceramUS DraelongusPolyonyx gibbesi

Suborder Reptantia (Continued)Section Anomura (Continued)

Family Paguridaea ru longi car pus -

Vagurus spp.

Family HippidaeEmerita talpoida

Family AlbuneidaeLepidopa websteri (?

Section BrachyuraFamily Portunidae

Callinectes sapidusOvalipes s pp .Portunus spp.

Family CancridaeCancer irroratus

Family XanthidaeEurypanopeus depressusHexapanopeus angustifronsNepnp texana sayiPanopeus herbstiiRhithropenopeus harrisli

Family Pinnotheridae

Pinnixa cylindrica7Piixi sayanaPinnixa spp.Pmnnotheres maculatusPinnotheres ostreum -

PinniT xia A UPinnotheres crab

Family Grapsidae -~...~ ~Sesarma cinereum

Family OcypodidaeUca spp.Tc-pode guadrata

14*.

Page 22: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

TABLE 1(Continued) ~'.

Family MajidaeLibinia, spp.

Family SquillidaeSquilla. empusa protozoeaSquilla sp. antizoea

I Order MysidaceaF Family Mysidae

Nemyi americana

Metamysidipis mundaHeteromysis formosa

Incerti settusShrimp26

K Shrimp 6

Megalopa A

lpMegalopa BCrusacan 1Crustacean 2

I

15

Page 23: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Station 3, with peak mean abundance (x=30/m 3 ) at the James River

station (No. 6). Pagurid (hermit crab) zoeae had the largest mean '.

abundance (x=192/m3 ) of the noncommercial decapod meroplankters.

They were reported mainly from subsurface waters along the Bay

mouth (Stations 1, 2, and 9) (Figs. Al and A2), and were dominated

by the species Pagurus longicarpus. Its major occurrence extended

from June through October, with a peak in August and September.

The pea crabs (Pinnotheridae) were represented by larvae of

Pinnixa spp. and Pinnotheres spp. (Figs. A3, A4, A5 and A6,

respectively). Pinnixa spp., represented by three species,

occurred in the subsurface waters of the Bay mouth stations (2, 3

and 9). Their occurrence began as early as May, with peak

abundances in September; however, individuals appeared in the

plankton in late November or early December. Pinnotheres spp.

zoeae exhibited a similar pattern with lower numbers per unit

volume. These species were reported most frequently at the inner

most stations (4, 5, 6 and 7) over the two years. Peak abundances

of the pinnotherids occurred in late July, August and September,

and were dominated by P. ostreum.

The fiddler crab (Uca spp.) was observed in both neuston and

oblique tows (Figs. A7 and A8). Their period of occurrence

extended from June through October; however, a few larvae were

found as late as December and February. Peak abundances occurred

at the Bay mouth stations (8 and 9), particularly during the

second year. They were recorded with modest numbers at the inner- -

most station (No. 7) and a few offshore at NDS. Their numbers

were much higher from oblique tows at the Bay mouth stations;

16

Page 24: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* . . . .. .* - . - -

ULhowever, the few at NDS were from the neuston. Uca minor is be-

lieved to be the dominant species found. Xanthid (mud) crab zoeae

were predominantly observed in the oblique tows from as early as

May to as late as December (Figs. A9 and A10). Major peaks '

occurred in August and September along Thimble Shoal Channel and

near the mouth of the James River (Stations 2, 4, 5 and 6). Very

few xanthid zoeae were found in the neuston tows. Therefore, it

is assumed that this group resides in more saline subsurface

waters. Zoeae of Neopanope taxanna sayi were the most prevalent

of the five species reported in the lower Bay. Callianassa spp. --

larvae were mostly observed in oblique tows from June through

September (Figs. All and A12). Their abundances were greatest at

the Bay mouth stations (2, 3 and 10) during 1982. The only major

occurrence for both years was from Station 3 by Ca llianassa sp. A.

Among the shrimp-like groups, the sand shrimp Crangon

septemspinosa is the dominant form. Its larvae appeared in early

March and peaked in April, May and June during the two years.

Stations 1, 2, 3 and 10 exhibitea the greatest abundances from

oblique tows; however, occurrences were recorded at all stations ..

including NDS (Figs. A13 and A14). Neuston tows showed moderate

occurrences at Stations 9 and 10. This pattern was primarily

during the first year of the study. Two mysid shrimps were

recorded with regularity during the study period. Neomysis

americana was the dominant species with peak abundances noted in

late summer (August, September and October) (Figs. A15 and A16).

It was well represented at most stations during much of the year;

however, N. americana was most frequently collected from oblique

tows at Stations 5, 6 and 2, with peak concentrations at the "

17

.* .. . * . . .*

Page 25: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.1, A. ". vj

former station (x >25/m 3). Larvae of another mysid shrimp,

Mysidopsis bigelow, were observed in the fall and early spring

(Figs. A17 and A18). It occurred in peak abundances at NOS in

both oblique and neuston tows during 1982; however, it was largely

restricted to oblique tows from the Bay mouth stations (1, 3, 9

and 10) the subsequent year. Larvae of the holoplankter Lucifer

faxoni occurred in the study areas in late June with peaks in

August and September (1982 - 1983, respectively) at the outer

stations (Figs. A19 and A20). Maximum numbers for the two years

were recorded from NDS.

Among the fish eggs, engraulid fish eggs clearly were

dominant. The eggs began to appear in March and April and

increased in abundance in May through July (Figs. A21 and A22).

High concentrations were reported from both oblique and neuston

tows for the Bay mouth stations during the two years; however, few

were reported at NOS. There appeared to be a great deal of

variability between years and stations. Neuston tows from

Stations 10 and 8 showed peak abundances in 1982 while oblique

tows were highest the following year from the southern

channels (Station 2:>"x= 80/m 3 ). Moderate numbers were reported

from the inner stations (x <30/m 3). Most of these eggs are

bel ieved to be those of the Bay anchovy.

The occurrence of sciaenid eggs matched the seasonal trends

of the engraulids; however, their mean abundances were more

conservative for both neuston and oblique tows (Figs. A23 and

A24). The Bay mouth stations represented the areas of greatest

concentrations during July and August; however, eggs were also

18

* o •

Page 26: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

P collected at the two most distant stations (7 and NDS). Peak mean

abundances for the two years occurred at Station 9 (x>70/m3 ), with. .

average abundances over the study period much lower (i<10/m3).

Most of the eggs presumably belong to the weakfish.

The number of bothid eggs collected were not enough to make

the initial filter. They were collected as early as March,

however, their occurrences extended in low numbers through

November (Figs. A25 and A26).

The category "other fish eggs" contained all unidentified

eggs (Figs. A27 and A28). Their abundances paral leled the

seasonal trends described above for engraulid and bothid eggs.

Their numbers tended to be higher in 1983 and localized near the

Bay mouth stations (4, 8 and 9) from both oblique and neuston

tows. It is interesting to note that they were more abundant at

the lower Bay mouth and inner stations (4, 5 and 7) the previous

year.

A list of the larval fishes collected during the study

period is shown in Table 2. Their numbers were low in comparison

to the crustaceans counted. Among the flatfishes Scophthalmus

aquosus (windowpane) larvae and Etropus microstomus (smal lmouth)

1. larvae were most frequent (Figs. A29, A30, A31, and A32,

respectively). Scophthalmus aquosus larvae peaked in July at the

Bay mouth (Stations 1, 3 and 9) and NDS from subsurface waters.

Etropus microstomus larvae exhibited a similar pattern except

their abundances were noted the following months (August and

September) from Stations 1, 2, 3 and 9. Larvae of the summer

flounder Paralichthys dentatus were collected during the fall and

winter from subsurface waters (Fig. A33). The hogchoker Trinectes

19

..- ,* *-.-- .. * *-. .- - *-- .-. -..-,*

Page 27: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

maculatus was collected mainly during the summer of the second

year and from the lower Bay stations (1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 10) (Fig.

A34). Bothus ocellatus larvae were seldom observed in the study I

are a.

Sciaenid fish larvae were observed in trace amounts

throughout most of the study period, and predominantly at the .. 4

lower Bay mouth stations (1, 2, 3 and 8). The weakfish Cynoccion

regalis (Fig. A35) occurred in July and August from subsurface

waters while the spot Leiostomus xanthurus (Fig. A36) were

observed in April. A few larvae of the croaker Micropogonius

undulatus (Fig. A37) were collected in September from Stations 1,

3, and 4. . -

The Bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli exhibited the greatest

abundance during the study. This species is probably responsible

for the numerous engraulid eggs observed. Their larvae peaked

from June through August in the subsurface waters (Figs. A38 and

A39). The Bay mouth stations were best represented; however,

occurrences were reported at Station 7 and offshore at NDS. The

sand lance larvae, Ammodytes hexapterus, occurred during the

winter-spring at Stations 1, 3, 8 and NDS (Figs. A40 and A41).

Other larvae such as mullet (Mugil spp.), blue fish (Pomatomus

saltatrix) and menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) were reported in

only trace levels (Figs. A42, A43 and A44, respectively). All

three were collected at NDS in the neuston; however, only the

menhaden and blue fish were observed inshore: Brevoortia tlrannus

at Station 8 in November and Pomatomus saltatrix at Station 2 in

August.

20

Page 28: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-- -- -- -- % k .- r " 0 - a - 2----

TABLE 2

LARVAL FISHES COLLECTED FROM THE LOWERCHESAPEAKE BAY AND NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITES

DURING 1982-1983

Temp. (OC),Spawns Salinity, Location

Family Anguillidae - eels -

*Anguilla rostrata Mid-winter

Family Ophichthidae* Leptocephalus larvae

Family Clupeidae - herrings*Brevoortia tyrannus Fall & Spring 10-18 0C, Coastal -

Family Engraulidae - anchovyAnchoa hepsetus May - Aug 20-250 C, 20 ppt

-Anchoa mitchilli May - Sep 15-300C, estuarine

*Family Lophiidae - goosefishes*Lophius americanus Apr -Jul inshore

Family Gadidae - codfishesUrophycis chuss Summer 5-10 0C, offshoreUrphyis regius Fall - Winter offshoreEnchelyopus cimbrius

Family Ophidiidae - cusk eels-Rissola marginata Summer & Fall inshore

Family Atherinidae -silversides

*Menidia spp. Apr -Aug 140C+, inshore

*Family Syngnathidae - pipefishes and seashores*Hippocampus erectus May - Sept 200C+ Cestuarine

Syngnathus fuscus May - Oct 15-206C estuarine

* Family Pomatomidae - bluefishPomatomus saltatrix June -Aug 18-26 0C, inshore

Family Uranoscopidae - stargazersAstroscopus guttatus Spring

Family (4ugilidae -mullets

Mugil cephalus Nov - Feb 150 C*Mugil eurema Spring - Summer 200C

*Family Gobiidae - gobiesGoblosoma bosci May -Sep 150C, shallow

21

Page 29: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

TABLE 2.2 (Continued)

Temp. (OC)

Spawns Salinity, Location

Family Blenniidae -blennies -

-~Hypsoblennius hentzi May -Sep 200C, estuarine

* Family Stromateidae - butterfishPeprilus triacanthus June -Aug 180 C, offshore

Fami ly Trig lidaePrionotus carolinus May -Oct 14-230C, offshore A

Family CottidaeMyoxocephal us -

octodecemspinosus Nov -Dec 32 ppt, estuarine

Family Sciaenidae - drumsSCynoscion regalis May - Aug 18-250C, 15 ppt

Leiostouus xanthurus Dec - Mar 150C, inshore *

NTicroogoias undulatus Oct - Feb 110C, offshorePooiscromis May - Jun 150OC+, 20 ppt

lai chrysura May - Jul 150C+, 25 pptBthus- elau MaTndNvinhr

Family Both idae - left eye floundersErpsmicrostomus May - Aug inshore .--

ParicThthys dentatus Aug - Feb inshore

Scophthalmus. aguosus Apr - Dec 8-170C, coastal

Family Pleuronectidae - right eye floundersGlyptocephalus cynoglossus May - Jul 9-100C, nearshore

Family Soleidae - soleskTrinectes maculatus May -Sep 200C, 10-16 ppt .1J

Family Cynoglossidae -tongue fishesSymehurus Plagiusu June -Aug()

*Family Gobiesocidae - cling fishesGobiesox strumosus

Family Tetraodontidae - puffersSphoeroldes maculatus May - Sep nearshore, 12 ppt

Family Ammodytidae -sand lanceAmmodytes sp. Dec - Apr 6-11 0C, inshore

22

Page 30: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. .

Additional plankters were considered "important" groups in

the region. Larvaceans occurred in high numbers (x>lOO/m3 )

throughout the Bay mouth stations during the two years (Fig. A45). W

Greatest abundances were recorded from the tows with the smaller

mesh size (153 micron); however, they were well represented in the

oblique tows from the larger mesh size as wel 1 (Table A2).

Polychaete larvae were reported from all station samples.

Spionids represented by Poj_1dora spp. dominated with high

abundances (-1OO/m 3 ) at Stations 5, 10, 7, 6 and 8 (Fig. A46).

Magelonids were mostly reported at Bay mouth stations (8, 10 and

9) but in far more conservative numbers (Fig. A47). Similar

trends were noted for trochophore and nectochaete larvae (Fig.

A48). Bivalve larvae had the highest reported mean abundances for

all species studied (Fig. A49). Oyster larvae were restricted to

the inner stations (Fig. A50) (see Butt et al., 1985 for review).

Phoronids exhibited the most conservative abundances (x<10/m3 )

(Fig. A51). Greatest abundance values were recorded from tows

equipped with the smaller mesh nets (153 micron).

.. " ". °. .1.

23

-, °'.°%" °IF

Page 31: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Larval Recruitment

There is a net seasonal flow of water in most estuaries.

Associated with this water mass transport are planktonic forms

that may be carried seaward away from parental stocks. In

addition, the dynamic circulation patterns of water within an

estuary complicates the study of planktonic population dynamics by

increasing the potential for broader geographic distributions.

Benthic populations with planktonic larvae are particularly

susceptable. However, re-invasion mechanisms, either physical or

behavioral, serve to return or retain larvae and juveniles to a

parental habitat.

The meroplankton of the lower Chesapeake Bay and coastal

biotone tend to be dominated by seasonal pulses of a relatively

few taxa. Four basic patterns of recruitment of these planktonic -

larvae to the estuarine/neritic environments are apparent. They

are: 1) estuarine forms may be retained in the estuary during

their complete life cycle; 2) estuarine forms may be carried

seaward by outflow circulation patterns and re-invade at a later

cycle; 3) coastal forms may be drawn into the estuary via tidal

currents and later migrate to the neritic zone; and 4) coastal

forms remain offshore. The estuarine water column of Chesapeake

Bay has been described as a stratified two-layered system: low

salinity surface waters overlaying a more dense higher saline -

bottom water mass. These density currents interact with local

tidal currents to produce net flow at each depth: outflowing

24.24 % '

.*..*.-v.--........*...'...-.....

Page 32: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

surface vs. inflowing bottom waters. A species' vertical location

in the water masses determines its relative horizontal displace- ,

ment. It is unlikely that any one reproductive strategy is

limited solely to the above patterns. However, retention/re-inva-

sion mechanisms are described for several benthic invertebrate

larval forms that combine behavioral adaptations with circulation

patterns (Bousfield, 1955; Carriker, 1951; Sandifer, 1975;

Scheltema, 1975; Goy, 1976; Sulkin et al., 1980; and others).

Most of the decapod crab species observed during the present

study are considered to be "estuarine." Xanthid (mud) crab larvae

were "numerically important components to the plankton in the

lower Bay. They occurred in the subsurface water layers allowing

• them to be retained in the estuary. Those larvae that may be

• .transported beyond the Bay mouth descend to the deeper waters.

This processes allows for re-invasion along an inshore gyre or

with the inflowing waters of the two-layered flow pattern

associated with the Bay (Butt and Alden, 1985). Similar larval

distributional patterns were exercised by the Pinnotherid crabs.

Pinnotheres spp. and Pinnixa spp. are retained for the most part,

in the middle to lower regions of estuaries (Pinschmidt, 1963; .

Tagatz, 1968; and Sandifer, 1972) or are associated with the mouth

of the estuary (Dudley and Judy, 1971). The pinnixid crab larvae

were reported most abundant in the Bay mouth, suggesting the

presence of local breeding populations associated with the

artificial islands of the Bay Bridge-Tunnel. Their numbers

dramatically decrease seaward (Sandifer, 1972; Johnson, 1982; Butt

and Alden, 1985). The mud shrimp and pagurid crabs show similar

ecological trends. Ecological havens for other planktonic larvae

25

. -.-'-* .

Page 33: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

............. .-

have been noted in the Bay (Manning and Whaley, 1954; Chamberlain,

1962). Restricted circulation traps larvae and accounts for __

repeated heavy sets of oysters (Manning and Whaley, 1954; Haskin, p

1964) and barnacles (Bousfield, 1955).

Chesapeake Bay is of particular interest when one considers _

its size and the influence it exerts offshore. Short term dis- :.,-',

truptions to routine flow patterns around the Bay mouth are com-

mon. It is reported that strong winds can produce outflow surges

resulting in a 10% volume reduction in Chesapeake Bay over 48

hours (Boicourt, 1973). Re-invasion mechanisms have been suggested"----4..

for certain species of crabs (Callinectes and Uca) where their

larvae are routinely transported offshore (Tagatz, 1968; Smyth,

1980; Christy and Stancyk, 1982; McConaugha et al., 1983;

Provenzano et al., 1983). Larval development continues during

"* this transport phase. Similar ontogenetic migrations are reported

for estuarine species where earliest stage larvae are found in

surface layers, with later stages more prevalent near Dottom

waters (Sandifer, 1975; Goy, 1976). Recent studies tend to sup-

port this contention with respect to the fiddler and blue crabs

(see Butt et al., 1985; Butt and Alden, 1985; Johnson, 1982;

Provenzano et al., 1982; McConaugha et al., 1983). The early

stage larvae are transported offshore with the Bay plume, however,

" re-invasion occurs in the later larval stages through a wind-

driven corridor(s) that is only partially understood. Larvae of -'--

the blue crab constituted a major component to the meroplankton

community at NDS.The larvae of other major groups of decapods exhibit

26

4. 4*--.4-,.

Page 34: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

distributional patterns rather different from that previously

described. Some neritic/coastal or pelagic species may be found

in the Bay. Larvae of the rock crab have been classified as

'. a "retained shelf" form that seldom enter the Bay (Sandifer, 1972;• t" -- .- "b

Johnson, 1982). Their zoeae are carried inshore by subsurface

tidal currents. The megalopae, in turn, migrate to the surface to

avoid entrainment into the estuaries (Johnson, 1972; Butt et al- "

1985 a).

Larvae of the sand shrimp has been reported as the dominant

decapod larval form in previous studies of Chesapeake Bay

(Sandifer, 1972; Goy, 1976). Apparently, its larvae are from an

indigenous population found in the region. Mysid shrimps are

epibenthic forms similar to the sand shrimp. They too play an

important role in the food chain of inshore waters. Mysidopsis

bigelowi tended to be found at NDS throughout the water column; -;-.

however, it dominated the neuston tows at that station. Its

occurrence inshore was restricted to subsurface waters from the

Bay mouth. The distribution pattern of the estuarine mysid

Neomysis americana was clearly indicative of a nearshore/estuarine

source. In this study, this species was found in bottom waters

from the lower Bay; however, it is reported to frequent the sur-

f face waters d ur ing the e ven ing h ou rs (Hopk in s, 1965)

It is often difficult to fully appreciate abundance

estimates reported for plankton from widely divergent groups that

occupy different social structures in the plankton community. The

numbers of fishes larvae col lected during this study were not--

sufficient to be considered "numerically important." However,

their numerical abundances are not expected to match or be

27

.'- . .. - * ,.),'i . . . ,* . .. *.,.*.*..-*_* , .'-*°'. .... ° ..- * - .- . - .--. * . *-.,.2 .. . . . . . .,. . .- .. *-o ., % ,

Page 35: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

0* %

comparable to abundance estimates for the crustaceans described

above.

The Bay Anchovy appears to dominate among the fishes in the

study area. Their eggs (engraulid fish eggs) are believed to

dominate the egg counts during the summer months. Anchoa mitchiIIi

is classified as an inshore form (Fahay, 1975). Fahay (1975) ."*- *.

noted that many species of bothids and sciaenids spawn offshore

and the larvae migrate inshore during development. The few larvae

that were collected during this study were predominantly located

at the lower Bay mouth stations.

Aside from the Bay anchovy, the largest numbers of important

fish larvae collected belonged to the flatfishes. Among these the

windowpane and smallmouth flounders were most frequent. They

spawn along inshore waters during the summer months except larvae

of the smallmouth flounder were found a little later in the season

(September). The summer flounder exhibited a winter spawning.

IF AF

2828 IF

Page 36: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ,',".

Many of the estuarine species maintain reproductive

strategies that allow their larval forms to be retained within the

vicinity of parent populations. Larvae of these forms select the

subsurface waters preventing their explusion from the estuary.

Other species routinely are carried offshore in the surface . .

waters. Notable among the crustaceans are the blue crabs that -"

undergo entogenetic development offshore and re-invade the estuary

as juveniles. A number of offshore spawners were found primarily

seaward of the Bay mouth (e.g. Cancer Irroratus larvae, and

Mysidopsis bigelowi); however, they visit the inshore zone via

subsurface currents. The only taxonomic groups of meroplankton

that appear to apparently move through the study area in

ecologically significant numbers are the blue crab larvae, the Bay

anchovy larvae, bivalve veligers, polychaete larvae, larvaceans -

and the sand shrimp larvae.

29

-29:Y.".N

Page 37: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

ACKNOULEDGENENTS

The authors wish to express their appreciation to the

taxonomists who spent hours with the microscopes. Particular...'

thanks are extended to Ken Kemidy, Donna VanKeuren, Jeanb e.

Stankovich, Jacqueline Annis, and Anthony Rodi. Additional thanks

are given to the field crews of the AMRL vessel R/V Zoea, and NOAA

vessel R/V Laid]y. Final results were made possible due to the

dedicated data processors who managed the massive data sets and

never dying mainframe. They are John Seibel, David Wade and

Martha Norris.

This research was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers, Norfolk District under Contract DACW65-81-C-0051.

i .

-.. -

30

..- . *:-- .

Page 38: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

REFERENCES

Alden, R.W. III, R.C. Dahiya and R.J. Young. 1982. A methodfor the enumeration of zooplankton subsamples. J. Exp. Mar.Biol. Ecol. 59:185-206.• • • ~...-...

Alden, R.W. III, and A.J. Butt. 1985a. A study of physicalparameters at the Dam Neck Disposal Site during the summer .of 1984. Final Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Norfolk District, VA. 21 pp.

Alden R.W. III, and A.J. Butt. 1985b. Water quality monitoringat Dam Neck and Norfolk Disposal Sites. Final Report to theU.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, VA. 46 pp.

Aron, W. and S.B. Col lard. 1969. A study of the influence of netspeed on catch. Limnol. and Oceanogr. 14(2):242-249.

Atkinson, E.W. 1973. Seasonal composition of zooplankton ofthe lower Chesapeake Bay and Virginia coastal waters: M.S.

Thesis ODU, Norfolk, VA, 80 pp.

Bell, M.D. 1973. Fisheries handbook of engineering requirements

and biological criteria. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Fish. Eng. Res. Prog., Portland, OR, 497 pp.

Boicourt, W.C. 1973. The circulation of water on thecontinental shelf from Chesapeake Bay to Cape Hatteras.Ph.D. thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD,183 pp.

Boicourt, W.C. i981. Circulation in the Chesapeake Bay Entranceregion: Estuary-Self Interaction. In: Chesapeake Bay PlumeStudy (Eds: J.W. Campbell and J.P. Thomas) NASA ConferencePublication 2188, NOAA/NEMP II 81 ABCDEFG 0042, U.S. Dept. :.of Commerce, 61-78 pp.

Boicourt, W.C. and P.W. Hacker 1976. Circulation on the

Atlantic continental shelf of the U.S., Cape May to CapeHatteras. Memoires de la Society Royale des Sciences deLeige, Sixieme Serie 10:187-200.

Bousfield, E.L. 1955. Ecological control of the occurrence of

barnacles in the Miramichi Estuary. Nat. Mus. Can. Bull .,137: 1-69.

Browne, M.E. 1974. Quantitative and qualitative seasonal

analysis of the surface zooplankton of Magothy Bay, . .

Virginia: M.S. Thesis, ODU, Norfolk, VA, 113 pp.

Bryan, B.B. 1974. The occurrence of Podon intermedius in - -

Chesapeake Bay, a new distributional record: Ches. Sci.15(2):120-121.

31

". "","" °" "°

Page 39: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Bryan, B.B. 1977. The ecology of the marine Cladocera of lowerChesapeake Bay: Ph.D. Dissertation, UVA.

Bryan, B.B. 1979. The diurnal reproductive cycle of Evadnetei gestina (Cladocera, Podonidae) in Chesapeake Ba'y', .V.

stiaceana (Leiden) 36(3):229-236.

Bryan, B.B. 1983. The diurnal reproductive cycle of Evadnetergestina claus (Cladocera, Podonidae) in Cheseapeake Bay.in press.

Bryan, B.B. and G.C. Grant. 1973. Distribution of cladocera inlower Chesapeake Bay. VA. J. Sci. 24(3):131.

Bumpus, D.F. 1973. A description of the circulation on thecontinental shelf of the east coast of the United States.Progress in Oceanography 6:111-157.

Butt, A.J., R.W. Alden III, and R.J. Young. 1985. Meroplanktonof Lower Chesapeake Bay and Proposed Norfolk Disposal Site.I. Blue Crabs, Rock Crabs and Oysters. Supplemental Contract Report to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk,VA, in manuscript.

Calder, D.R. 1971. Hydroids and hydromedosae of southernChesapeake Bay. Bull. Bur. Fish. 46(1091):277-381.

Carriker, M.R. 1951. Ecological observations on the distributionof oyster larvae in New Jersey estuaries. Ecol. Monogr.21 :19- 38.

Chamberlain, N.A. 1962. Ecological studies of the larval development of Rhithropane22u s harrisii (Xanthidae,Brachyura). Chesapeake Bay Institute Tech. Rep. 28, 1-47 .p p.

PP..

Chanley, P. and J.D. Andrews. 1971. Aids for identification ofbivalve larvae of Virginia. Malacologia 11(1):45-119.

Christy, J.H. and S.E. Stancyk. 1982. Timing of larval "-production and flux of invertebrate larvae in a well-mixedestuary. Estuarine Comparisons (V. Kennedy, ed.). AcademicPress, NY, 489-504 pp.

Crandall, D.E. 1974. Seasonal composition of zooplankton in theLafayette River, Norfolk, Virginia. Masters Thesis, ODU,Norfolk, VA, 67 pp.

Dauer, D.M., R.M. Ewing, G.H. Tourte 11 otte, and H.R. Baker.1980. Nocturnal swimming of Sco1oe co le2ides viridis(Po lychaete: sp ion idae) Estuaries 3--TR7T r..

32

Page 40: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Y-7-W~~ 79 ,-Y °. -0 6

Dudley, D.L. and M.H. Judy. 1971. Occurrence of larval,juvenile, and mature crabs in the vicinity of Beaufort ...Inlet, North Carolina. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-637. 10pp.

Fahay, M.P. 1975. An annotated list of larval and juvenile !

fishes captured with surface-towed meter net in the SouthAtlantic Bight during four R/V Dolphin cruises between May

1967 and February 1968. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-685. 39pp.

Feigenbaum, D. and M. Kelly. 1982. The effect of sea nettleabundance on lower levels of the Chesapeake Bay food chain,manuscript in preparation.

Gi lchrist, S.L. 1979. Feeding morphologies and distributionatterns of marine cladocera in the lower Chesapeake Bay:S. Thesis, ODU, Norfolk, VA, 74 pp.

Goy, J.W. 1976. Seasonal distribution and the retention of somedecapod crustacean larvae within the Chesapeake Bay, V a.Masters Thesis, ODU, Norfolk, VA, 334 pp.

Grant, G.C. 1963. Investigations of inner continental shelfwaters off lower Chesapeake Bay. Part IV: Description ofthe Chaetognatha and a key to their identification. Ches.Sci. 4(3):107-119.

Grant, G.C. 1977. Seasonal distribution and abundance of theChaetognatha in the lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuar. andCoastal Mar. Sci. 5:809 -824.

Grant, G.C. and J.E. Olney. 1979. Lower bay zooplanktonmonitoring program: an introduction to the program and . . "results of the initial survey of March 1978: Special Scientific Report No. 93.

Hask in. 1964. The distribution of oyster larvae. In Symp. Exp.Mar. Ecol. Occasional Pub. 2:76-80. Narrangansett MarineLaboratory, RI.

Hopkins, T.L. 1965. Mysid shrimp abundance in surface waters ofIndian River Inlet, Delaware. Chesapeake Science 6(2):86-91.

Jacobs, F. 1978. Zooplankton distribution, biomass, biochemicalcomposition and seasonal community structure in lowerChesapeake Bay: Dissertation, UVA,

Johnson, D.F. 1981. The use of recruitment mechanisms by themegalopae of selected brachyuran crustaceans of the lowerChesapeake Bay and inner continental shelf. Estuaries 4:277(abs).

33 ..................................... . . . .. o

. . . .............

-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...o°.-°.. .....,... .. ... . .....-... ...... . .. • ...-.. %..o.,"...

Page 41: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-.• W- . o

Air

Johnson, D.R., B.S. Herter and J.R. McConaugha. 1983. Studiesof a wind mechanism influencing the recruitment of bluecrabs in the Middle Atlantic Bight. ODU Tech Rep. No. 83-5,52 pp.

Johnson, R.E. 1976. Circulation study near Cape Henry, .Virginia, using lagrangian techniques. Institute ofOceanography Tech. Rep. No. 21, ODU, Norfolk, VA, 80 pp.

Ludwick, J.D. 1972. Migration of tidal sandwaves in th E ...Chesapeake Bay entrance. In: Shelf Sediment Transport (Eds:D.J.P. Swift, D.B. Duane and O.H. Pilkey) Dowden, Hutchinsonand Ross Stroudsburg, PA, 377-410 pp.

Manning, J.H. and H.H. Whaley. 1954. Distribution of oysterlarvae and spat in relation to some environmental factors ina tidal estuary. Proc. Natl. Shellfish Assoc. 48, 56-65 pp.

McConaugha, J.R. and A.J. Provenzano. 1980. Distribution and

migration of blue crab larvae in the lower Chesapeake Bay,USA and adjacent coastal waters. Am. Zool. 20(40):888.

McConaugha, J.R., D.F. Johnson, A.J. Provenzano and R.C. Maris.1983. Seasonsal distribution of larvae of Callirnectessapidus (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the waters adjacent toChesapeake Bay. J. Crust. Biol. 3(4):582-591.

Morgan, S.G. 1980. Aspects of larval ecology of Squilla empusa(Crustacea, Stomatopoda) in Chesapeake Bay. Report No.:NOAA-81022402-11 and US Nat'l Mar. Fish. Serv. Fish. Bul .78(3) :693-700.

Olney, J.E. 1983. Eggs and early larvae of the bay anchovy,

Anchoa mitchilli and the weak fish, ynoscion regalis, inTower Chesapeake Bay with notes on a s s oc-ia t e dichthyoplankton. Estuaries 6(1):20-35.

Orth, R.J. 1971. Observations on the planktonic larvae of

Po Iydora Ij gj Webster (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in the York.Che s Sci. 12(3):121-124. a

Pinschmidt, W.C., Jr. 1963. Distribution of crab larvae inrelation to some environmental conditions in the NewportRiver estuary, North Carolina. Ph.D. Dissertation, DukeUniv., 112 pp.

Pritchard, D.W. 1955. Estuarine circulation patterns. -

Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., Separate No. 717, 81:1-11.

Pritchard, D.W. 1967. Observations of circulation in coastalplain estuaries. In: Estuaries (Ed: G.H. Lauff) AAAS Pub.83.

34 ..

& ....... ... *. . . .

Page 42: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Provenzano, A.J., J.R. McConaugha, K.B. Phil ips, D.F. Johnson,and J. Clark. 1983. Vertical distribution of 1st stageof larvae of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus, at the mouth .1..

a of the Chesapeake Bay: Estuar. Coast. Shel ci. 16(5):489-499.

Sandifer, P.A. 1972. Morphology and ecology of Chesapeake Baydecapod crustacean larvae. Ph.D. Dissertation, UVA(unpublished). 532 pp.

Sandifer, P.A. 1973. Distribution and abundance of decapodcrustacean larvae in the York River estuary and adjacentlower Chesapeake Bay, Va. 1968-1969. Ches. Sci.14(4) :235-237.

Sandifer, P.A. 1975. The role of pelagic larvae in recruitmentto populations of adult decapod crustaceans in the YorkRiver estuary and adjacent lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuar.Coast. Mar. Sci. 3:269-279.

Scheltema, R.S. 1975. Relationship of larval dispersal, geneflow and natural selection to geographic variation ofbenthic invertebrates in estuarine and along coastalregions. In: Estuarine Research Vol. I (Cronin, L.E., ed.).372-39 1 pp.

Smyth, P.O. 1980. Callinectes (Decapoda: Portunidae) larvae inthe middle Atlantic Bight, 1975-77. Fishery Bulletin, U.S.78:251-265. -;

- Sulkin, S.D., W. van Heukelem, P. Kelley, and L. van Heukelem.1980. The behavorial basis of larval recruitment in thecrab Cal linectes sapidus Rathbun: A laboratory investigationof ontogenetic changes in geotaxis and barokinesis.Biological Bulletin 159, 402-417 pp.

Tagatz, M.E. 1968. Biology of the blue crab, Cal linectes saildusRathbun, in the St. Johns River, Florida Fishery Bulletin,U.S. 67: 17-33.

Thompson, J.R. 1973. Ecological effects of offshore dredging andbeach nourishment. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coast.Eng. Res. Ctr., Washington, DC, Misc. Rep., 73 pp.

I

3 5 'S-.-.-'

Page 43: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

APPENDICES

-CW.

36

Page 44: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

LIST OF FIGURES ,"16

FIGURE PAGE.

Al to A51 Abundance (f/m3 ) of important meroplanktongroups by date. The numbers indicate themean values of four replicates for the towtype (tow type I = 153v oblique; two type 2= 353p neuston; tow type 3 = 353w oblique)at the station. The station locations areoutlined in Fig. I of the text. Most ofthe fiqures are log1o scale except for afew fish species ............................... "

LIST OF TABLES I

TABLE PAGE

A1 Summary statistics for each station/towtype combination. Tow type I = 153 micronoblique tows. Tow type 2 = the neustontows, while tow type 3 = the oblique tows,both are 353 microns. The "MNMNABUN"column are the grant means of the speciesoccurrences from the individual cruisemeans (n=4) for the station/tow type, while"SEMNABUR" are the standard errors of thesevalues. The "MXMNABUN" are the maximumcruise means observed for the station/tow type. The "POCCUR" column is the per-cent occurrence of the groups for the sta-tion/tow type. The "PCOVER" values repre-sent the percent occurrence of the groupsover an abundance level of 1 /m3 forthe station/tow type ........................... . 91

A2 The taxonomic groups that met theabundance/occurrence criteria of 1O/m 3 inat least 5% of all observations and thestation/tow types for which they met thecriteria. The "MNHNABUND" column has thesame meaning as in Table Al. Tow type 11:i 3 1 oblique; tow type 2 = 353 p neuston;and tow type 3 35311 oblique . .................. 126

37

Page 45: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

iT W.°'" J, -: "

[ II %"~ % W

N LIST OF TABLES(Continued)

TABLE PAGE _

A3 The abundance data for importantmeroplankton groups of the study area. Thevalues are the means of four replicates, a- %

while the values in parentheses are thestandard errors. The order of presentationis the same as that in the text: decapodcrustaceans, fish eggs and larvae(flatfish, sciaenids and others) and otherinvertebrate larvae (bivalves, polychaetes,larvaceans and phoronids). Station, towtypes and corresponding mesh sizes (153 and353 micron) are noted .......................... 134

38

* '., . a a / .. .a,. .

.. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . ..a-.

Page 46: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

A..

Figs. Al Abundance (i/rm 3 ) of important mero- .--

to A51 plankton groups by date. The numbersindicate the mean values of fourreplicates for tow type (tow type 1 =153 U oblique; tow type 2 = 353p neuston;tow type 3 = 35311 oblique) at thestation. The station locations are .outlined in Figure 1 of the text. Mostof the figures are log 10 scale exceptfor a few fish species.

** .

I..

4~ I. * . •~

F

:-.*..~.: :......* .. *...o

Page 47: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I c

10

w

IL Kgo -

LL..

I

I-,

S0

S..

IU 4

3l.0

- ~ .. J Ico

CLJ-9

0

M 'A

400O

Zge%4

Page 48: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

0 A

10

.. % P. %0 . %Y-

on

fyIn I6 N

NIN

0 444N N

m4 N in 43

4. .

9 no CL

cc 0 0 Q

m- a. C3

t. or.-4' 4) ,.1

0 co

.0pt

41

Page 49: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

4

In b

40

CL1

LU CL

LIn.

cc

go

ccI C

40 .4

Io

10

IL

I I-

46--~~~ 0 LC

424 4, .*.

Page 50: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Ll

0 I 0

wI a

P..

10~

N M4 NA

Nf NL !N

116 N1 3N

M~W N -r-

II

NN

0. cc

u-m II

43

Page 51: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I0C

*LU

I-* '.

10OL

* go

LA 0.

1en

0

00 1.

00I N

Lu

40 ccI

* NIN

I. CL

I-,

IL-cc jcw%.~ft ACL C

Page 52: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

uq u- V-7 -. k-T- w d- V W-i -- -~ -~1 - L~ V V' VYN '-77 7-1OF :

I,- IIJ

II

I g

S- - J

I-.

I -

N C 6N N4. m0 ~ 0

40I

4r

0 20

gc 4- a0 44 w 0. IZ

45-

Page 53: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

C.

go* a

+ .4

0

+ ujLL

0.

co

LI-,

a.a.

I-

-0 10

2o.

at 1

10

0 a0

40 0 0 1Qj

0 to 1 CIuCF-.. .. ~ ga46

Page 54: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

4

S,-

N* -r

r-4 I

-N

zo u I-

--- 47

Page 55: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I.L

4r

Ileu

W

100

I-

CL

INJ

k.:

*0LUZ

z LL

40.

In

NI

0 Li a 1

3 48

Page 56: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

'46

14r10co'U

I C5

45.

.0 -4oo d 0 10 C

Uf4' In rJM 4- IC.

In 0 f"1

P-4

0. m 10

A.~~e EN el 4 .0 .

a' I

R40

000Iec

41 I c A.

O'449

Page 57: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

N Sw

10

10

IS

AI

L

* 0~'10

I CI

I 4

IN O

40

10

4

12

4

+ #

500

Page 58: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

IL

In _

fli m

P4 N us

£ N

0 toff1 N -OD

LA-'

W,co NN.V.1

0. o gC

4p.

fn ~ ~ -4D-

c

cIC

Ij~~~I M 0A A L0

51.

Page 59: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I U.

I _f

ac

9LL

LLI-

ICL

4

IO

coIxi

IL

+ I

M C P a A 90, 06 VICL CI A

524

Page 60: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-4 - v-. -

00 el If" ry N L0 4.

WN Nw -ao

ry -C W N N4

O0 N4 C I-

0 ccC

'0 N IL

o y 6. a I

In 4 C

0" 0y C) Io

M N p

fIC

M .44 CO .

.4 NP en I

* -40040

LL. C I

0~ CO NCP N4 I04~

LL. 0 4 Nf-4

co-

M 4 N CL

0 I

0 c. C a~ cU. 196 6 C0A

Page 61: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

4.4 coo Ib

LL

+ CL.

1.0

C.

CL IC

00n

LL.4

0440

LL,

z ~in~C W .1

a.

V4- -

.4 I 0 Z b..

ZO E lq % of aN 0 1 C

£ ~- 0 454

Page 62: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

0.~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 %f -"I

ey~~ .4 In 1

.40

0 .4 ~~ @~O0IhN A M9

N y -4 f eI

km % r N 4 % AI

f4.

IL

ry 0' cc.

lU.

o go

A Aw9N4 0 LM

In-

NN Nn f N

9.4 -

N y 0% 4p -9% .

L~W U.a 9

0~~~~ 4% N0% 4 N4

0 4% -A Nb9

a90.

9% 0 3 -A -A 9 4 CV I4

550 N-4 9I L

Page 63: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

W.,

1%9

1 U

C13

VII LU

C2

6UU

ID

P.

IC W A 1 4 A 0A M I

Page 64: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

t- . .

C N. L

00

C6C

KP4 en

In coIC

I i C K :4

04~1 N+dM.

C0 0 I

I V9

IN of 2

If

C~~~~1 341 000 0

Page 65: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

10

+ wA

oae

o

I.

10,

ac~-

* 0

C6

J~~~ 3 0 9 V-

58-

Page 66: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

d. M

go go

U.

oo 0

I-N

ICL

en Nj I I

I LO

If'.o I0

y -t

10

a* C

-- 594

Page 67: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I-

+ mu

0~ 0-

ILC

. U

.

ceoof

0~~ Wy

-60-

Page 68: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

W.I.-N-7. T7

IL1

300

UNU

631c0

IL00

N 0M 43 r

CC cr cr4 z

Nt n -C

4c

UJ t ) 0 al t 1

61N N4

Page 69: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

*. A

'IZ

co 0

CIC

-- 62)

Page 70: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

*1*7

I.o

0m' .4.0 -

0'40

00 0' L **

4. 4 .' CcW

InN

N co -T.men' 6m 4 4. 4

cc t .

I'-

41 7 c

63 .~ ,~ '

Page 71: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

'~gt-~- i- i, ~zw i-. a- -b ' YtWI ~'LP~'? ' ~. ~ -r -u~ ~ -~~W I~ ~ NJ.~v-vv-i v-; v~ vvv-Jr J-'

Go do~.

a(

LO- LL

I z

:) 4

-c -

co-

II-

64.

Page 72: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

LL

10

1r.

Ia,lB.

C3 OD

g,

CL Ir

LL. IC 3

a w

IL

40

0 -65

Page 73: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

40W

gri

IC.

w CL.

A. co

0

0cc

C0 L"5

0

ic V U. 'A a

N I~ -0 %,~~' 66

Page 74: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

,'4 -. -. -

go

Ni.4 - % .

6.

6M4

M .4 *.U

" P0 06"

ri 40

I C

000

In

L40.

at

+ LM

mM 4

u. z c-. %

CIO

0.A-

67 -. .- 0 I. ( 'T "' -. "

• r'. IN3

o .4 -

.' - .... '.

- 0,,- ". -

•6.." ". .

"r, 4 0-

c, ©' , .. '. .6VZ-

4"r,, INg,,,.

oN ,o 6 0 . - .- -

- N ) . '%"""5.,

0~ 0 I.,;." . ,: '._ ,-",-,;,L ., : _ , * "I_ -?- :;_ -,-".,L " .' --- "_ ' - ';.--." ."-. _. _.; " " " -. :-';._ ."; .. -'; 4-- 0 -

Page 75: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-Z V. V~

1 z

+. M

1' 0

.0:

0j 1

j V

CIA

IW z

41. a . I -C 2'

~ I I68

Page 76: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

o ,- ,-.

.q,,.O

I.

II-

I &Al

. C. ", "a. 5 .

0 c

0 cyI

N%

IL CL

N -I...-....

C 0

I0"

- 1-- 4o %

Ic

0 I U '

• - o

0 Ic

CL

10

5- . -.

.. ,.

&A~~~ U- 0 LC rV-c

-IN9

Page 77: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

LL..

dow

ccI~

+ *' j

70.

Page 78: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

EIL

7~ --

43 W1

I c

I N

.40

UJIC

I CL

V.4

- ICL

CO%U

IN

e't14ja4.~ -J w U.

Page 79: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

40

j 0 + 06

I 0

goN

~CL

002

IO

14

10

01

v C 1

72I

Page 80: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - -- - - - L - -

In

1'L

I-

* N I L)

co4 .:t vs

* I- .~-+

4r

90.

940

IIN -73-'

Page 81: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

4. LI

ftj %

2R

.4 1w

UU

7'

m 06

- vi

LL.4

ICO u

le -

10

I N C

/ 4W

*'*t. 4

747

Page 82: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.4.

AA' V

oM

401SI

ko 2.

* LJ

mJ I.. a-L+ ,- -.

-4*

IN x

0 1.9

'A fn M FY N - 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

75

Page 83: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

vi 10CA

I.

IL

go

10

U-4

I -

13~

6M~I 4pr

100

t* 0~ M 0 MI '0 CN 2 W 2

07

Page 84: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

*LU

do

00

0 010

CLL

L.

IN

4'-4

LL~

IN

IUN

0 It

.9 c u a0

77, C.

Page 85: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

INp

ccN

ALI

0 N ~ cc4, NLai

g~ 4LA.a. - I-

ocI)-

co.0z

co LM

10

4 L L

4 0a 2

0 m 2.. U -

780

Page 86: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

ep.*

*0 X

I CL

N - d

N10

4A.L4

1

IL

799

Page 87: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.0P P

a go

4

I -

ey 0

uj ILL 5CL. -

CA >-f .

l

- ly

ILL04 w 6IJ

IA IN

2

~ ML

-Co 40V~ 0Z 'CM0,

* -80

Page 88: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

--Io L-~ ~ 7T 1% .Ao *- .C , - - ; a -

4 Ui

c10

00

- I --

s- L4..

LIL

LL.. co

N

34

W - .CLC

814

Page 89: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I 4A

12,

to

LL..

4 P4

14

10

104

O.Iu.

a 6 41 a a2 A I zip

-', 824

Page 90: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I U.

UNA4z

*I

ev

1 0

fy

0 3o 0 f, I

Page 91: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

VT. L%. .*.V

+NL

f" 94

*0l

P..

a. a N

+ m

-~C 6NW 1

40 4EP 0 .

.1 5 (

a O .. Go

-I .0

LLL

M .. d I..

.4P N -K.00 (N

N (Q u+, (4 L

N .4 4. ~*~ c:Lc; 2.

CL, 1 -4 L'

UNNC4

e4 (N44 -

IV 6%

0 LL

In z at .

I C6U -4

84

Page 92: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* P 0 0 I

In IN

on .dO

on C AI

a 0 I40 M ~ N

.1Of

- t" F , 77

M~- cc4 N F

pI)

4%~~ N L 4.'4% F- L

CL 7:.r

co ey in

CN F-j p-

0 01 . M 0 cf..

go

inc

FY -. Mn a04 -4CL

1o 0

Inn

CL N 01 4

W85 .'o~

Page 93: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

p

+ W

LIUU

6-

4

6U r.

!I L IN

000*no.

IN

WNNA.nI

ofN M 1 ~ c

*A.I. N N 4

el Ma 0C 1 01 a-

g-4

Page 94: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I .0

I l)

.0 C3

0 M 04 . .- a...

fmI N

N N -0

10

0~~P -d. 0 I

06.

MN) I

0~ .4 N .

-'4

NJ.

taf- N . 4 N ~ 1.

.0 v 4

N ow

87

Page 95: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

:."~. ~ ~~ . ~ - .+

.0

co

400

47, N4 4NNd0II"N

0 cc C

M' -4 In W t

In IC

UN 4r

IU..0 ccN C.

4 ~ ~ P en4I

30 .9

0N 40 N. 10

n -4 44Y m r.I

CN4 cc N10

10 L0

IV I" -

-dI a~ N4I -

N ko vi 14 4 N

In

4 NIA '010

-4IA 4' 4 A + *'.-

IN N

CO N 1 .

88 U

Page 96: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

ICI L)

4 0

WNN

'D. P- W,en

0WN~I~

F- .0 4 4'. .4o

~ 'E 4~+ c

I4~ N I

LO~~ :*~.,.'v

-00

4 "Lu

f- w j '

U, M

ofo

014

e.)0

A IJIQ

89C

Page 97: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

'.0

+ D

10 w

14 4. .)

I 4m

.0 1.

J co -C Lm*o

MM4IC

-4Na w' ..0 md I

-4 goAac

-4 '0

90.

Page 98: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

;-.-, ,.-.,

Table Al. Summary statistics for each station/tow p_type combination. Tow type 1 : 153micron oblique tows. Tow type 2 = theneuston tows, while tow type 3 = theoblique tows, both are 353 microns. The"MNMNABUN" column are the grand means ofthe species occurrences from theindividual cruise means (n=4) for thestation/tow type, while "SEMNABUN" arethe standard errors of these values .The "MXMNABUN" are the maximum cruisemeans observed for the station/tow type.The "POCCUR" column is the percentoccurrence of the groups for thestation/tow type. The "PCOVER" valuesrepresent the percent occurrence of thegroups over an abundance level of lO/m 3

for the station/tow type.

91

,. .. . . .. . . . .... .. .

Page 99: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-- A165 341 IMPORTANT NEROPLANKTON OF THE LONER CHESAPEAKE IM' AND) 2/3PROPOSED NORFOLK D.. CU) OLD DOMINION UNIY NORFOLK VAAPPLIED MARINE RESEARCH LAB A J BUTT ET AL. MAR 85

UNCLASSIFIED OACW65-B1-C-0S51 F/C B/1 NL

mhhmmhhhhhhhuoEhhhhhmmhhhhl* EommhhhhmmhlI fflfflffllfllfllfllf

Page 100: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

7Z

€/

4 .. /1Q

No

,.-w:... -'lii"-- U - J

IS.

MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART .:...,,,rAQS 1Q A

Page 101: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I I

I~P .P W%%eI' 4

a P aI P 4

0 I

cc

z PCPF ~40 0 w 0N

14 1" " 4 In % -. 1a z 4 C f" -

I 1 0 0 NO 4p4I.-2 Z CP Q y4) 1 z 00

x 44 xz aJ 1! 4 KN 4 0 d N

a

$A W a, 1 Yf"f 4V

= fn f- N rr4cI I 2 ~ ' a

a' zJ 4N Z- .J CP

- . ~Z .2 .*.. .

In-

.j -

IL

01

o~ ~ C, .*

0 II0 0. 0

IL 10 0%D -'A c I. *IO 1CIL c

* as I In IL c

1.- Ic I

Svu u a 0 7 a ..0. 1

fo w ucaV allI -

a a eu V *92

Page 102: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

S..9 N9 O9 -

ma f4 .g m N ag 4

get 'rr* u * . .. * * * e 1

C a I- An. pOM o,

I~F f" P04 4' . si

.9. 4 P

I z -00,&0 N aI~~ ~ ~ K 2F .f

4I z 44 Ir~4

x I" " w x -74P -Y

Z- 9- WN o -aawC t4 -P

X b W 4 4W

IL z z-~

~ ~ 41- * * . * .. *~ 4~r

- 4 4 ~ 4 ~ I 5 5 2 9 9 * 9 9 9

I 2 i 2E~r d~ U9 ~ 9 9 : * ~ is- 0 0

.J K ~ 5M J j K N . 0 % o... o0 u~ *~J-a-pW

m S A

Sn -- . ..-is N--.%10 7L S

(.53 26 -d 0 M sis .5 1, Cs4 O 9 0 s K

C CL

UU I- .C

I. le 464a-3 . .

9. 93

Page 103: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

eg m -0a-a

304@- F. 'a fy0 r P p O

a 6 i YP m- . . . . . .

4. 0 n llt - d- 'lI La f 0 C 4 4w cc or_ _.I tjm - 0 %0oo ta

z CP 2. 4r I4

I f a %n F %1 o -VP

40 0 z 0 4 .00 0. I4 inNN ~ ~a. 0 0. ~ m I 0 0 0 4 4a 0I -! ! I - I% 4% f" -0 -d 43

z N.-AN Q C. bfl4 4'0-4, 4

F. C - -a

z .d4~a 4 Q~c'eeI 0~00P~-009d .I . .. ~4* * I Z s~lin4-4 = * *. * 4%

)(l .- - l'l .4 3 4 t-

Iz I ra1ai v 2:F r"l c u A- -f n4 4 ll 6.

- 4

NN04~ a. 6N . . 0 Il z .0 z (P . 0 a- a-

WN Iu r.fl f a fy N0

14 x ,t

02

C a-a-0

LU 0

.0 Cc 10. MN~ 0c 12 - I r.

- N L

a0 11 a1

J, A . U w'-0 -3 xa z-z

a. 46IL -0 a a 4

-4 a a. 2S.l e

94a

Page 104: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

U, f

I 0 a 4

I U P.U..PsIM

I, 4 f"a bI

4p~ 420z Nc0mS0~ns

V I ic 00^j4P

4 Z S C AN M-. 2 u

oy P4.5C **

* ly-

o ~~I K NJfA

.1% 0

0 cca

.4w C, Z IN C9,

M~ r OC

7- 0N.

21I

21.

Sq95.

Page 105: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* o ON P,. o N .4,,, N . N NN N N 4,40 4I W ,. NQ 0 M 4 f" pd 4 , 6 N o , .% _...d 4 4 ," in o

MN 61 N ~ So: NNN N0 1y I 0 fd t 0 4 "0N 'ONO4 4p 4" NNN N -

I ~W " . . . .-I , m. *N O .04InN0 4 M4. 0 Now ( M N4mm 0MNNMN .m 0 4N tM M 4mw N f" N PJN41

0 IV ( yF 4we ,04; 00a 0 204 y P M ty1%I N N r4"I-4O-N~M3UQ a (" 04 4 " u .0 4 N wN a N M( .0f

o m N a- N . m if% . F o o N a m , , , .. o. W o" • o ... . o ' N N GO Nfn

, r N•M 4. .. ....i.. .4... W ..z

6I% 4 t 4 CO" NONN 4f4f"N0aVU~NNNMN -M No N N 0 0o00 0 O O.-a0000l -T-..w.*0.-

CC

W

0 N 0.0 0'N.4.d -0fn N 400 . 4NOM MM 0 P4)N-W P . .04 4 tMM NN0 N-NN Coen wC- M 20 o cc *4 *" p- *r * 'A f* * * d * * y 0. N cc C" 0. oS f" 0. *% cc I* I5 f .omN0 2 .A .0 *zI nmm-NN

)-, -" n-.%, -t_"I- It

f. o -

c It

IA C

lU

o - f 4I ,N m -a - -::'--'-'

a 2 M lo 0. ! 10, on 2 = ,

0. 0. --

I 43 I I I t

N O ,m. l 1 =' " V i : , 0*0 Q Q

A c U 0 V 1 ) 0 0 CL2 a 13 U0 U 0,C C

:9 c ... ., P , ., 4, I x, ... ,A-Ad E -ME ,- . - -, -0 C

c" Eu i- 2C fuu CLC 0 A x cC

Ii 4 o qO *-u40%*2.9 '. 0 -'. -M.

.. u q v . . U .0 A U -A 4. 3 a o M a 0 'A Z- .4 C cc e 00. M. , ., Z M& U C . V

z 03 02 c3 a;.4~- -. :! II ;C a. c U4 - C0. ff4 53 -0 U. W ~ 53 0. . 5 22 to c cuN 4 cfU0 U

aI 4 430 03 a~;U 0 .04.~ 0 l 0.c0 . W-3- 41 7 * .ba IMV Ij a II 43 13 101 4 ccu 4 - ~ 4 1 .3 Z .4 W'Z . 0 61 -~E O.2Eu1 144 A 4~ C ~ 1. .1.1 CL

.D 4~4U ~3q ~ 4- U4 ~ .i4 O.4 4- -U -. U 4 .96

I U1 ~ U u14 44 1444 2434 U USU E 4~C1--C SUC 4 421

Page 106: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. . . . . . .~ . .' .W . .~II .. .!X . . * . . . . . . . . .-.

M %n IA 43 C1 C8 CA - 4 49. N W% -d 45 68 4A .8 43 -4 4P -4 A P. fy W% N % -A A .4 A I AN A IAn AI AI

I . . .1 .N 11 It a: * z 1* * *... .0 9 ; N 90 lz *z I9 Iz *z *z *: *

I *M r-0f -O %P tN N .WN WNPP. %P-rW N -it0f-4 W% W, r-i b yfjr %W

VI :i1 2 0w Ig9 fA e I~0I0I -IdAI x 8.q ~ - 0Q NI .N -I- .~ M N

f"*%W f" M d0 0 4M~ A- 40IA .I0OI IAP .4 lW% - v y WW

3c O -4 "K UN0 4%F-P.8 ID sNYN N fQ9mo- 00110 0 00

W 0000000000 000 000000 0000 000

4J 2 oooeo-rN P meooo - 000 N c oc co% 000 -- y6 W 4N %0a0006

-C =- 0w NN0Nmo Pww 000t0 " f y0amU %m N C6 nNM0

N 2 1 IA0.8.N P.MANoP o .0 0N w00 N1,N w P000IPAr-tIDI9AO0i

I .8'2MO0O@

-L Xc1 M0e. v% n a 0

14 ~ ~ - I 0-,C.., I M rA V - r e

0 a 1 30 1 01; w.;.9 2'4 y 0 Am a9A 4

10 '4 C4 4 L ' 0 4v V

I m 1 4 11 a a2 ' C -

102 V,1 9M 0 a2 0 443 L. -- La-c 2r a1 aU 0 10 ' 1 2 C @ 42C C M 4A2

0!.4 0a .0 0~ *- a1'- CX ! -9 a.. 0 03ft~4224 0.4 2 40 010mu L 40C - aa

I8 II 'C U ! a.990 - I '''4 49 ' 'A I2. 41 4 0 . 91- '40 2 '4 %M 01 -A' @ 4 '4

I 6 ~ 2N 2 4 CiC'4 493 42 97-

Page 107: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

090f Ic4 kaC b0 0P 0 0 @ 0 CP cW~ N. I-J.%

09 ol % 47 . . .P N .0 . 4 - to -V FY -4 4 4 4 M k" 4 * 4 y 0 a UN 4 a m N M *y *y *v * 10 *r N= 4 - %ja - W o - 4i el- Pq . ... M - 4. N W ey -4Ma oa n. -W #. 4a -c )I rC NWWJu N 04 -4 P44q n y i cr41.. y y0 co' f.Noa...f f " NA y o

NO 0*-z. o FY 0 N0 (P 0 4 P. .40 .0 .0 4. 0l 0 #N1 a- ft Nt O* 94 M% .40 M N 0 N 4% 09 a 0. . 15 - 0 CO P- FY 4I~ 4MP.0.0460.04%P~e.0444P.O59 9 4...40

9 %4 119N P: i9 4% -1 P: 0:../

z W0 9, In " ?0 a.N- o .4 0 P 4 a. -0 0 P .4 0000 . 50N W 0 - PIV. 0 N N9 N. N P- 0.0 5. N- W% N N 4d .04

N.MN mV NWW N w 444 ..

2o N 4%-4 P40 r .4 .0N0 00 00P0w%@540.4 NNN SNONo 0U0 z oM01 0 %0I % r wN MI

-0p4.st5.0N .r40 4 P"-4 04% 6040coo 0 0000 0M444 4 59oo0%4.0 0400 coo5I O N 4 4 4 4 .0L0 P 4 9 0 5 MN N 4 9 4 4 4 s .j 0 4 0 . 0 0

;~C

%A~

2 NOt ItM o.0ON P1iO . 00N 0 40nN' r4 yN r j^ 5 1.o I0

4*JJ

o *6

Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~C . ZOP44.MNN..s4000000000000000006A I

.- c

5~CI

-4 4,

a4

to 0 T QIr U 5, .0 Ij4

49 Q 0 U 0-- 0 -1CI -

9 M4 A CL W2 u CL C36 0) 4L 'm a m-- 0.4 tr

'A 0 0 Of - c 0. TE 04 mJ 4D NC A 4. 06C CM 0 CA 3. AU 0

ff 0 C 54 06C- m to~ at - CP It ~ ol4 0 afa A m a t4 40 4 04 to #0 LLW 4 'o

I a&1 101 a0 6 .- m 1 4 00 4 N C m ccmI r4 3.0 a4 " 44 .- ,0 4a 4. r5 C -0V 0-2-44 . rC *

I11 Go, 4 we COL 010~4 US a *04.40.4u v 0.!4

04 44 4U4 0 A04 . A444 54 . . v Al a.U:1u4.0 -j 4.0:4.10--44 U44UOF.

98

Page 108: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

1 0

I ~~ . a 00 ** ** .* ** .0 ~* 0* 0

WN0b N .1 % .4 N 0 W% 61% 1% r- 0N N4C a.f N 4w. rmW M6 N Nm 0W

I -vw Mo NNN 10~-4O Q~% 'a m4

M -C P gN & .nN M-140 00% 0 %rN. -. 4- 4- 0 0 0000N W 00000000 000 00 00 oCc 000

0 UN N *0 -r *4 W% 00 0 0 *e N 000 N 0 In 6 00 00 * 0 *

6Z 0000000000 00 0 00

z 00000000000000 cc 0I0 I000co 0O

o W% 4f" _ 40 4("0 W% 6 4% V%00 4d400 0 6N 4 00 N t0U~M f- 44-) I- .0 O4f4U4 r4E'ON N -~ .000000ON00

L- Q C*04 *0 N*0N- 000 * * * N*". 0 N 0 P.NN 0 0 *0 N0 P * *0 400 0 00000 00 0 0 0 0000 00

4-4

C Ca 111!AiCL In' I. 0 1C

c x -4IV I C,~U~ U a0 U 4-

u CL r*amC0'

Page 109: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

at- N ".4=404O00 4 00-400000000 00 'S-.4Ilr 40w9 0 9 *'' a .' 0 0'-~ ''

I% .. Ini .4 - 4M f "

* ~~~~~~~~~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S S * S * * * * * S S * S S * * * * * * S * * . . . . . . . . .. .

OA-.

U i . M a-00W- U 7 .0 N C 0 ~ 4 N0' - -I 0 O-i.N-4 UE.4 0: .N N.O ON -i Ml'NON %0-E N M M. OM

WNaI ,N ,e A P. ~0, . w D A4' a0'4'N r N 0 4 w 04'U N0Fo- 4r w M em (N0).J . f 4 4

2M wI - r - 0 -f " 4N ak

0I .

7 ~ ~ M% 0' .fl -r -'NtlNM 0 N - N4 b% N O'' d M. N -a 0- co ' N " N' N - ,0. INN M, .f~ 0.4 O Md 1% N N

(.0 CP r" i~~4 n IM4' en .t r- .'I .04 kn 0 OMEN MO0N d'aOin0w N 'o 0 0dE1E' 44 4 ' MS N w N '

0 k

L-

7 ANMf r0 eP % f aa 4 eNc W- 0D, -WI - "r9 ,Pdo W I 6%a . ra of p' 0010 . 4 4- -1 ) 00n %NM4.N1 n0W n0 -I 0M F o1 V- "4 00 CNr 4aMNw. MM 10. ,0 1I

- I c

4I

th

u-AE

a Vl

lo 0 0 a wl0V'

0 c0 3 u %A al a-l c all

Qi -4 IC 0 -j

Ql cR RE E S aR at-~ 0- W-LO%' . .

4 0 14 g-o -- 0, 4K u 71. Z a

I 06 0 : t - 0 fl to W 4) 10 . v~ 4 a

a C A c cl a0E a~a~l a c' c~~E lC0 0 0 0' CC V~~ u aCl ~ - J

I 0 4 I a0. UU 0 w 34I- 0' aE Cui C C 0. C ' C 0.4, 6 C = - 4 2- C

sI 0 C A M C U CEECE a aI a MUEE. 0!: a 6Ma!-ACC 2I~~~~o -D .0 0 6 O Ui I I4 16 46 -9 a

Iu vI 04 u l zlC v xc 9 A -0 4 0ESS wl wI 24 44 wE 0Lu J

i0U IE SI4~'6E62~ti l6El El~E6 It~I 100CS

Page 110: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

of a4 fa NO fa 0 Nf0* a * a 00 ta) a.. . a. a 0 0 cc a ce ~ -to cc a 00

C39L~-. 1; -. ,azIzP

v pq 1d~0 - C0 y0Nf1., ad cc0000000000000000a000000000

x 0 .at s *c ,a.. a , ,as ,t. . . ,t . * ..

fm CY ,M"F N N P. ad .. 4

Iykn 0 a. (

It 00000 000 0000000 coc o0 co 0 00coo0000 00

a 0 N 0dI m 4 0~ N 0c' 0iI -4N0 v 0 N 0 WE "M WO4 0W% %AfJ YMN94i W - D? 0 N~ N~I MN NO f- fn r 4%- C> 0 Y .AF 0

lt NN0 0a ryC l-C f"~l 40 1I0 01 N~ C401 So NW 6W

r C f~l 0 0r c od N a 6% 9 I N1 c.4 .4 -t 00 0

I-A

'A I

CL 7c... Uc... S.C. a cc tac....to0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 *f Z F -1

CL6 C

CL 2i 06il L41 c ! 2 iv

104 a9 V -j 4 0A

u 2 -- - USk 0 6 U2v -v 0. 0 L 0 9LU X* &

iv 5- 02 11 i.I 2 95 2 v 0U .. a

c - iv m. CO. -a qa smO cc0 4Y CIO .11 10 A -! 0 C- Ci

0 51 0 % i 0 CD0f C 0 Q Va 1

0t .C 0a-00 0 Q. 0I 5 O 0 c CI VI c c E O 0C 2 .a

a~ fa~ a2 a- - 0 34 341 A .w ~ i 2- 0 C.iaZN -4C U4 I - Q6 4L 0.WX J 0 0 w.UO ~20 U 0 j

Page 111: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

in Fy N N N - *

IL 0 ; ;, 1;4W

I P W W a a, * P 0 r N* a, P- y CF * l S 0 w 4 * * C' N 01 * 6 * * N * * P- N C' 0' N* V S .4 MS 4 C J 0- a,. N- V. 0~~U ~ i A a e2" o6 e nIN VA 00 N0 L 01 4

0 f"d am r yk " C yF ,:i 0 Ni "0- o4I .. 4000ms rl WN00w 0 me'a N Ca, 0,c

W: 0: M. 0: 9S SS W. *S S rS W:55 V:. 5 W*S. 1 M D

* ~ ~~ N 0, 4 C , 4 0.~~ q~t N.. .44E4 -6 .. 4

x OI

w I U

IZ

I C3.;4.

I 0 NKIaa 4wNN0C d M m mN1 7- ,Im co -- d "LC. l4NN0(.. 0ma f-4 m 0N- NU 10 CmI 40 I

CL 0N00, 40.400 000C;00 0;00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

-1 a,

* 00

4-0 A g 0 ck

t 0A - -

-4 C- CK00uu -m0

- - 3A ILVI v- .

'A II

U C .01 0

a 0 c r 1M ~ C ~ I*io - -a %C---a m A a 2 wu aA0 ' -. 20- a a

- -~~~~~~~ .r.P 01 05 CL. C6 .4 9L~. aV a~'s~ . ~ .aV

Page 112: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

j* u

I ~ r F oer .- d f--O~t - r r NN0 0 oP mC - %w0Nl 9 t 1 jI %0I yA t

z h WN0a0 0 d.0N00 1aIn0 00 0 0 0 0 0.00 n0 0

I 0 *. * * * *7 0. N * 1- * *o w N z *3 4N0m 4 . m ,.IMM Mm-- Ns -dc loo

I z 0 000cc 4 6M f04A W% 0 WN 4

z W% W .4 .10 .4N o- 4*****c" * .

Z 00 ~;0 0000000o0O0 0 000o00

4- z 0 0 N0N~~ C (0 M Wa000 00U 00W M

a m ~ 0 4 4 ' 0wN N .0u Cd 4 0 un 0 0 0 *

.u 0 0. 0000N 0 000NNN o N 00 0 000 m o oN ~ Nn0I Z 0 0MkN 0000NM 40 0 0 0 0 00 M )-W.

r 3

3 .0 0~ N 0-t 0l% O0 V ft'

vi .4 c .

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 00u003 CL O

LA w

I) r ICL 'I m0 wo4 aU4,w

I C, a a0 01 a a . 0

0 a~ Va.UO

11 .49 w4 x AiA L cf^0L

I 0 KO w4 E a-C NO 0C0

.4. t 0 - Aa- - .

1. 6m 0- M A .

0 C.041D 0 r I .m

-9 0 U 1 -faS V :a c Z.A0

103

Page 113: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

*i a- a oi 0i N %N N N NyN. 0 .- di00 00 0 0

. .~INP . . . ..................9L ti * 1 wz * z * z Iz 4 *4 z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 * **

I c l%( ~ Q I ~ A N N wNca d. c6 -Na l% PW -a1 c 0W N( .- 401 Df -d , a -

I 0 . -V - NJ -r * m In f. % -* (P . : * * 4 . W% N W% a v N . D f, . . cc M . . f" * % . 47 * NJ r- *i . .00 . j *4

CP 'D b% P. WN P.4 o W N0WiO rW4 A4*-r - ne -

z . 4_"_________e____aM0____m________In_____f-4 4 % %C"-4 CD WN- 0 4 0 F f e

Ic I yfi" y

I w -1.4.i r

I UN -6W Nf rN w- 1( nw4 C ( 0ww0wN0r1 P W s4JN '0 w m * ** . * * m * w w .4 . .N .N m . F .m .D . . N . . N N .P N N . . 0 N r% v 7- * .........

Q0 Id a C 0 mowwNUNdwMMw0N 0 m N w cc - N O4cr O 0 N4r0 fn0O00m0i0N00 en000 O.t'a CI 0 -,.:1-.4 4

I )( 0: I t :M 19-1" .9 !9i 9 % .4%

X ooaCc

cc I y N 0 000 0 000 0C .f .F 3 g - 4 g yg m4 ',g wa NW C4 r

CL rI- Z0

CL .0 40

4) toS %A 4) .0 A0m m A~~~~~~~~~ 0 2 0M O. N,~ 0 C0L~~IE 1 N N N N .- 6 . 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

.0 .0 0 CC

0 -C 000 00 t

-u CAIJ0 1 2

%2 c '-j0CL- CL Nm4 2' 6 0- -0 I

'A a %A 0*0 CL a 0C 0 1 :CA m A CL CL '

0 - '.M 100 , C 00 11 LC 10 II Z1 a L . 1 Z4, O6.; ; . m M 6 . .0 2. a 1 )V I i '0 W -0V 4Uk A0 . -A0j0 M- vL I- 4

'A 1W %,o 2 - .. M.UA'

0 m

cj - 43

104

Page 114: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

u 0 0 40- SNrr r. N r 0r P .NNP

% Ir

z N00I 0 00.40. 40 0M0 N0 0 a WN 0 O0 0 k"_

z - n0 N 0 N % 0i - m 4 .400-4 "400 000E o o o o o o o 0004, .4 ,pCOC O OC O

CD MNM4't -m 0"I " W " 4" I"NNN F 0060 0 0 0U, W% in f, -1 cc ry S.. 55X N 000 00 00 0j 0 0

Z 0000000 0

r_ I- 4p00M 4ar

3. N000 000I.0C0 0000 00000

00 A

-p Z

I C - 0A Z

.0C " '0 .1U

- a 0 ah. '

I 0 Q a

C1 11 4, * Q . C 4 1

I I

41 1 £004 U004U0.0 0.0Z*.0. KmCO

-~~~~ . . .** **.2.. N .* Q .

Page 115: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

r. Or '.p.irMP~ p .

us 0 . .4 mN P. . I- . p..S. ~ ~ P F-.0 NN

. . .. ..

L ty r y tf4 .4 fNO.M'.pp ~ 4

N WI N t*4I~ 'r inm0 aa Nd ,'daN c dMNP % %P 1 % Q 1 v4 D1 M- 4) P- r-S-

0 Cc O0 00 00 0 O N M .00.40 .00 in04 lW n- %m4 ,0 000 00 000 00 000004 r0 00

:0 A N PQ pCY .. ,0 aM .0004y. &O01. O0 o 4. 4.C. P4 t4 .jC M CO NPJr'N. -0 P. cca 6 4 0 6~t0 . & I Z6%0 0 % (7*r- doN m 0 d WN ao 0

NCA Nc04 0"' r '0 w..4'.0'~. 4P.~M .N.4.0.M .. o 0.ON 0.0.2I 9 4 ev4O'M f J 0 0 40 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

cI 0 0 *N *I *0 * *. M 4* m 0 0 * S* * * * S 0 *z 0C!0. 0 0 O 0 oo 0 0 0 . ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0w -;conC

N .j

.72 sW .. %a .ow sN f oF 4a n 0r . %.

0

4.)~~C M CL 00N ca.44M1u~r

o ~ ~ ~ ~ . r & M * 0 4, * S S * *S 5 * * * * * ** * . . . .

'A0

le IWI d0a V f

- A

C, 'WO: J A ...

0 CL sc c .0 -9 .-. c - a '

M- L C - %I0 A 0 M01 06 55 4N0 CP -" MaC C L0 v

*'A Cp .. , .0o1 M 55. cc 4001 0 06 3.- 27 M10I 1 1 AI IA. 2 0 0

_ 'u - -. .05 . '

0 Ui 45 IA0'' -K 010~00

'a-M M 0r A CLI 0LL--55 a0 S c Z vL.0. M4 V V1 M~ 0'31MM M3. 3ViC .1 :10 a0-5 V5' t A :5 0. " I 0C

* 5 0 0 55 1 a55 a a - S CS 11 ::u 0 - r 10I 0.U04 M5 aha a500 0.. 1-0': c 'AS .0 1 .00 0~ c5~ . 11

IL 0 CCPC6,C 4 0-~50 0-01 C S065' M510 -5055 -5 S 0 v u Aaso0 3 A05 r5.5Sg' a C,5V0 010~ - s i i 1 Ss

10'h. b5 .0 126 U -.. 5.5.151U5 0- -j UJ 6 C .0 JL

Page 116: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

w mr W Nt-m 4inf.W 00 . N W P Nr k

iS ~~ ~ Z *- N W,** * N N f. *. * n*

m i W % 0 N ( N4 W N r- fm W% 0 N N N . nN N a a

I(. 44 C, If.4, J

41, "1 "1 9 -1 a 0000000

000 00 000 000 000 0 00

z fn 0ON Ny .40 N O f- N.4 0, t O @ r 4N y rcIn 0 N Nr-C .00 cia 0

x 040 0 000 000 a 0

0w 00 0 000o 0 00 0 0

zN 000 ,. 0 0 0 0 0

4A

C 2 x N OO J OO0 c0IoOOOIA

I,- z 0000 Coco 000000000000000P- K . o * o .. o0 o. o * 4* ** 4* **

0) I

v 4

I 6I

.41.A4'A

0X 4 1 , 1

I0 c u(0 CM .- -iLa

I 2u CL 0 012 4 WI

I. 4A fA A~ 4 .0 ! a N4 10

m : UC 0 f4ff i .I4O.a 0 4 i 0 v em

a -V. U. ~ V 1 0 00 -I -0 0 0 0A M-3 a. ~ 40 A 1

-~ . l CCC I. -CW V I~ C vCI j CCPa. lot1W 1 ;4 ! a 'I m

IcZ''Z. cK. CLU. W1C U ZZ :Io 44 cy q0 a.1 0 q

-1 #A. LA C6 ~ C '0 04-4 L LV 6%

Page 117: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. . . .. ..* . . . . . . . . . .- .

W. P-,-M.-p

n ,

cc N4 0 C: N dW:.41 .0 f :0 : :P C 41 ! 1n

z a & -C N a 0.C4a-I .0 0-CE.O' NO VMo 0 M, 04.. -4 0 f mNM 4P.z4w6

= Z aDWN4 0- Pf N C MC 0e .N W - PC %4 %( -0 0CC W% WN ON 10 O lr m.4 f" V. N i w

I 5 * *S* *S * 5 * * 5 * * * *S * * ** * * *........-. ~~~~~~~i 2 * I O O N..444 O 04000 0 O O O O O 000 O

AAK

%A '

-. ~ a 3c 0~N~ .er 0C C; C'.O 0 0M. 1; 'C;I a ~ N'' 0 .4%;

K~~~ .0d4N-0000 000000 000000000 00

u 4,Ng ~ T 000 N 0 0 - IA C C4-' c m 0 000000r 2 M 0Pd 6

LII~ Z * *, *c t of * ~ S * S * * * * S * * * * S * S So. 61%' SiSN ~ ~~~b0000 0000000O O 00 0 0 0000 -N CL Ze a .m

a, 4- 0 LCL0Cz4,

a tc2C 7 C 4a I L 10 ,00 0 A M0I 4M0 0 4 ' 11 . .

4, IU 'ASI1 1

6M Cb .C I C-DAr" 0

1108

Page 118: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

I wi

%4 -.

-1 6%6 "aM4a. 1 ja .1.1- f

FY 9%O~I OON 0 0 yf

2 3c ~ E C -4 0 m sf%

m~~~~~ *. 0- -WNNa a

v FY 4 400

* ~ ~ ~ P *u cc 00 0MN N N N 4 d 4~ 4 0 0 0).2 00 00 000000 000 00

4- W 0 N n4000 NO Coco COMOO 0 0r_ f- 0 fYDF-0 r %6MN0 - 0W I 0 "0 nW

I" C I * f -P 0 0 - f %C

- 6

I 9 Ii999 9 9 9...9

.9W IA g

CL .0 C . m

CL 0 'A0

CI M b k ' II~ C h 10 r9'~

I . M C. P .7 -P .us

-eq a aIm. a1 10 CLI

.L V'0I IACL4DtL *0 ma 0 el 'I

u0qeq qC q0.eqI u Vm1, CI 0 ~ uju e g e- e

1qq e.q 2 0 a 0 a aq

I £ ~-*9e- -- u- ~ Urn.'

Page 119: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

%%

0 14L 40 -1 r C' r0wa .' . 0% r' r .

.. -04 om0 0 eOI.400 0000 00

* I ,

z In 0 P0co 0CI w -000, 000 0

cc U~ 000 000 0I LA 000 000 a

* 4A

M N A0N0 6%0 0U0 0 0 0W0 0 00 00 0 0

10 a 6% aF -00N000aN %t nI nO

- a. o. r-f.f -r y ir yP 44CL . - o o o o o o o e

CL CQ. ww u

6 IAI

CL 4 4

I CD

Ia 4 mU

-CC IS - £ 4

a 1 20 c

% - I I C S U .I

Page 120: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

3.. c f" f Wm~r9oo -

9L ItNIf py *M.994 -444

I U . 9 9 9 . 9 ...... .. . 9 .. * -*"d aG - 00 * . r 0* O n utN 3MN. . NI -a -C9 ~ Q Q 4 P y4 i 0P a 406N0' P 0fIV0P-n 4P'AtMAN 4)t-'fp

NN 00m1 cW Ef n yt 4 f y0r ,0Nc " c0 cc -r .N- "f ,f re

9 N a- .-4 -d fy fm 4 ey m0 0 m 0. 4 0 01 'C 0 N0 N- a, 09 0' '4Cr 0 0- P. 00 0 a m4 '4 P. 4-r r 0 A4 en 0 0*' ' a,1'

I e MCI 0 r - ,~ C 0 0 4 4 ' m40' W4I M' C M4 N4 . -1 NN N -

I z . .4C N 0 4 C.9 . N 0~ .04 4 ~ . 9 ' ' 0 4 0 0 4 ~ C t . . . -

r '4; f" -0 ' f.4-. -04 0 0 CW4C %4 04 's4~9 ~ 9 -9 0000000 0 8C

0

ku Z

(3 z

9. * 0

I-A

41

C4 0

0. 4 0or a - f) c

0.L 0 M 4

0 W0 9 a z44 c C 06- 0 41 C 7 4 a0 -0a *4 i . . 0 U N @9 - m C W '

06 M C 0 a' 0) -A0 A 0C. C CL M. 0 V* 0 to 0. U

CL Do m a .1 10 A 0 @ CL9 UkA v Lo 4 A~ C~ V- 1 L a0 0 CL Z0 -

N P fl 0 qIAM4 0. 0(- ff 0M.1a1 11 cA 0 10-44 m4v -1 4-'o0 4 U0 . W 04 -W 3 4 Q 0 f 40 m2 q V -V 0K

cc 0.0 .1 A0E0 1o. 440 44 MO0 J- -0 1~ A A9 A 1rl a IU11 2M T44 LA. 0(4 4L 04V 0i M6 S6 CL QNV 0 0. 4Cc.9 3 0a .04 CL a ' r 4 0 2k9 46 6 'A -3 C4 0 Cr- CC0C

Io 4414220,0IL 011 9C u. - 9 m9 (p V1 C ,03 Ct. -- C

:: 0*; C- A 40U4 @ V44U4-44 0 44 ~ E 0. 4 - 4 c@9 U 4044 0

Z 0 W2 0 *-4 2 u0VugOJ 60 C6 0C 6 & & W -C90.A-95=0-0' o *-1'C- C

Page 121: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. .* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - .

- I L

I : ; II ;

z kwCIc0*c ink 4n%1w M4ONON4MNO4InoMM4N.4 0 6%64 %0 y6 %NU 61% Af0''4I mMI'-NNONe mN 0 4 . .0 N0040 N

12 tyl 4 I.0 II

z 4p N~f 0 In in cc W%f" o4 P-N 44NyaN yi

0 0 NW .n .. . . .

m 0 40 0 N0 0 6N0 00% 6 0 0 %W 0b %6% 0

0

I- C 13 . C' .

2 ~ L CL t 0m 0 ~ 0 0nI 0 0 0 ~ f0000000

- I7

0 - A'AF .

I. .02 4 e

CL.45 a 02 , -AC4 0 60-:6' C W CLC C A CPq

I~ CL *'I4 41 VD~5 m5 .

'a *51 4 ! -0 0i-9 CL v u4 0 . C -fIf* 17 0

.- 4 4401 3Va 4 C5 C 0 0

WE 2b I 0 0- C ~C* 'a * '1C 'C49 I CLa a a aI'j. 0-.&0 C %3

II A5 U

Page 122: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

CA cc P. 0W4a- a, 6sI

w IV k"'~ -a0 0 0 0

in IrI

* . 5 4~~~~~~~~ . . . . . . . .S . * S * S S . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~ ..

_4 .4 M4%M~ N en0. Ir N_0 0. ~ ~ N S ~ 0 4

IL z 0 0 m F. w MM N P m m w 0a 0 00 0 0 4F 44 %00 000 0 0000 a4 000 00 00&

Iz 04M00 c-E.4 -P .0.40. O.O.4M 04cca 0 coo oa Ooo 00000 ~00c 0.0

z Uc "P 00- P- N r . r.N MM Q~~ f" 0c-lfDdn~ 000P 0,0

x 4 .d0NMN44.;.MM m 0000000000 00000 0 000 00

~-0

*0. 0 0tN- 09 95 i.~ -i91l

* I L

CL,

IA

I 5I

IA I

I~. 0 6~4

06 00- 0%SG

1 V40 - CL 00 u U- 40 0 *.a 2.-'-41 .o cr 0 u a. m 0X- - uhCa C0 C, C On 01 m .0 U9 W.N c w 0 U,

I6 (1 a - A4 0 11 CL 2 4S m A v caIn

CS ... 00- . .. .I~ i.00 0 1 10, 1a. 1,0 14AU -o IA- .20 #A o. CL co 0 a c L aL. C

'A o~~a ao go- 0 2 -c V somaM as 'A 5o55

*,*n , .4 A D- %AA OA .0 0 .0N WC AMA to 9s toqea 4a. 5s a C a i 30 M5 0q ': 2C 'S 2

U- C 11 a14 -C 11 M SI'eD- 0 C CL M 'V C16r- 1 It.so-u44 C ~ ~ q g0a 4. CL 1 & 4, .3 0 110- 1014 1~. lei c-a.q5 -

C~~~~ IUA0 C C -- - a NS U . - ~~- IC a 5 O --0bh 045 q~0 US- -C-- .- = so0 -US~=0S -C 5-0 00r

113

Page 123: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

0 kA n f l W %L

0 0 0~' t 0 0t 0 0 a 0t t 0

I ~ 000000000000

0 0nr In.0I.IO t t0 r I - N P- t.N 1 0 -f.

IP u 0 0000 000 0

I

I 4 0 r- PC

-. Uui 0 0 0 0 o.

0. z 0 0000 0 0

Cc

o z 0000000000000

4) IAO 0A t.0.

a. K CLt M M NN Nd.

- ~ ~ ~ ~ a 1-K 0000000

C~~~~ . 4, *S **-9

m :

3 0 -. C 0A 0 9C 0r 6 0 -9 1 0

b .

..

Page 124: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.7t' .~ . .. I. .. . . .- ~ . . . . ..

o5 Of"0,ap 4MA4."MOO mOMb 4 t " 4 M n0fMI 0( 24 0

11 0M000a44i "00Mf 0f n4f"aQamQ a0af "f 4cm c"n

I 00 O. 00 a Ir 00P -V0 P.90 -dWN s M Y.4

I -4

4ri n c r N C M 0 M 0 N0-0O00--008000000.

4LX M Na 0W t4 0 N NMN ~10 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 000000 0 00

10 A w IA 10J

*M m

r 2 CC.LM qd aN w 04 0 cM M 1M0

14 0. 'Of% O M N E 0. 14

Op In up IV CL 40 m 0

*~~~~- 14 CL 1.0M ONt EI 1 EM 0 M N JNQ- 00 14 KI 10MN~-0 U .J- -4 00000 30000000000IA.00NC w

r ' ,- Z CrN0 N .~~ .: 14'A 9Lc3 K0mc'

c ac

.0.

10Z rc

Ic I 1CMA 0 -C ' -A DC r mrm c w 3c~ I v O' - c . 0 7 U 1. ' "-a I LI c 0961 .; J LW L wx t ac 64 - j- o- j-

- zt- I

Page 125: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

~W' '' R W. - -V--

I C3

r4 %

04 nI ni 0 in In 0 in M 6%0 0i o 0 f

in0 0 ul% CD 6% 0~ WN

z 0~ co N .d4 10 0 0-

I IA

.5. m WM O VS OOIAN 2r_ I f. k" P.0 m : .N-P4f y0-4NNF

)I z~aI. 0. 1S a.9 9% 9 !9%% @9l

QS a 0 0VS :0 a iouQc)0C

in 0. v aOi 0. V

l I CL m m

IA 05 61- .t

r U .~C 0~01 110 ro"-U2U-

0 9

:0 CL Vi

A L Ve V a. -. C u -M a tt

Page 126: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

a,(w y oo "~ Q vN I NUo

u . .N. .'f' .* .... . . . . . . .. .. .... .... .. .. .. .. .. ....

* I ~. l-. ...44..4

U 4q. 0 1J0 Ny a- 0 r aN z 0 " . 4'EN .0 cc N 00 -4 N a w 4 cr0 N ' N 1% N cc% N ' 0 N go 1 N N U N w. . ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~' UP M 40C4 ~ 0C- 4 ~ ' '' N C N N N 4' -. , 4' 2 X% 0l r- J% In 4' 0 2 14 N'C4 '00eo AU 4% 0 7(5M Q0NE . 4 eN0Mp o NCZ'NoOM m0~%NE44'M.~.~ .ON4 Z.4~ CO 'r 00rEE"4

rI 0. 0O E 4 4 0 4 f N 0 ' 0 4 .N oo 0. jGooco fi E0-C N 4 'C'4 go , A 1 0-f co 0'N.~ .0

U N

0 .-i . • % CC!MN

I. F

z co cc 6m 0 C NN a N0~M~ Ln m EifUMN z-410 N N N a, a 4p 4NNr- r 0CC0 0 0 z 0'

= -. ;.-.A.C z .4N r. .0 cN Ili N

I o .- N 'r m N MNN 0-4-400w % 0 0 060 0 0000 000 00 000

z- m . .%C!C!. C

I 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 . 4. 4 4 4 ~ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 *

x O; mw -'-400000000 00000000000000 00 0 0000a 000 00; 0COO

o

C.-

.- 4-,- .2- o, , g" -. .- '.

C;A. K -

CL.

.,J

0 T

- 0A I

0 c , V Wm cC a.

C a, vi"447

o 4. w QNL4. 41 -0 0' CC 61 C kmw 0A Q C LC M v

- 0 IC M90MM0MMV' x014 V 4YAA AQW L-10 44 fa -l A-.-1 2A AV ' - ' 4CL

. ... .. . . • . .. . •. . •

06 A ... 'C..- e - - - .

A A 4Vvc 0 U C0 r- r. 0i 2.I: u2 CL AT -. g 4. . 1 N C

Ir .oi C6 ;j4 4C 2a La.ai 6c L j' A Cww .0 . LC2.aw

5 3 ~I.444C040~ 0 ~117U

Page 127: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

:1.1~~~ aD 4p...47r . e

Z~ 4

- .A,VO04*O -, NCffN ~ c fy"N 2 c N a W U " rSaCwC) I -A.'NW f N NN O c 4 N 0MC nl N4yt nNA0 le0WP ,A00,Amo -wwA 'Nm0ro-zwo -a

I j w.4' e" r Cr 4~ 4 no r Nam44r a' rP " ,N0m NI "e4~4 I w 0O~ . m n o a44 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

IV44 *C N f"o*yNf y - nN e y f

0 a, . .- "' 0 0 %W -NN0 0W 4k - ' 4G "NW 'Nf-f o 4 0NP

I x

P-0.0- I 6N 6OC C -44 0 0W rN .0 af"4 n .4In C 4 MCM0'r 4 fW N ( 0 - A , o 111 4.I N NM O 0 k~ (r044w CNM4.,V CMNwCm r.N 0M. - rCMNMMNOO44 p q Nm N0NMC4C, 1 I r 4

co a

n z ' N 1 0 N 4 N 0 N 4.0 0 0 N C N 0 0 N .0 a 0 0 -d 0 a M 0 N .0 0 0 N N a N M N 00 ad N M 0 0 0 - .a

A VI* ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ v C0 U4lgN0CI O C M 0 4~.i4N04.0~~d. ~ 0 M

I d~~0~0If4.i04 MNO.4 N4~ 00 N 4N C NC4 C, 4

a;~~~~~~~ 7; c-. 4 . 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)0 0 0 C C CC0 0 J41 4, 44

2 C 0 N C 4 .0 CL k Lmm t0 044M0 .! NN.M~04.qOOLIN -.~ t M N 4 4 4 4 4 0CCL0

0. 06' .-- ; '. .Q. -CA.0OD .0 0 I 4f A0 4 a mL A

41 0 l;4

0 I11 U A1 0 Ig~4 .- 0 11

*L a 4) to.0m V

LA I. cI qU6 0 71 A' ( 0201 ,o .

; -1 4. 4) ,4 -' .m I. ZC,~,4 '1 a -sf e c9C

wIi ' j0 x4 14 9 6A0 .uC 0w cC CL w) 10 LA. 4 a.n .Mi

4~~ 18)

Page 128: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

C

a 0 30 00 90 1-10 1 0 00 0 03

eS II L %

I z 0000000000000

x 000000000000 0

x 000000000CDOO0

I0 0 1N m

00

ry '

o 000O0 ooo

(.) ~ 0000O.0E0foo00m e09 0 0

N z a% N0~0 0n 0M0 r- a 0 % aty0 f- 4 C N 0 d 0 , . 0 . 0

it z 4 .a4rNf Z 00000 0000 00 c

- C

* Ic

IAA

I~ -.

9 2 1

-0 a CL

I3 12 Im 0

c 40 CL

44 C 4 U 3 4

.-. .@ . . .

Page 129: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

C00000000000 000Iw00000000000 000

I. 00000000000 000

I ~ ," a 000000 0,00

at 9 9 . ~ 9 9 ** * * 9 * * * * * * e * * * * 9 * * . . *

IL Z~ I t % Z~I'd 8 1: p;w z C zIz8 1 4 ;4w ;cw zW

-4NwN1 0 4N U m Nc 4mN U~ 4 f P P(P' n.y' 0 0 i WrMN ccN. N N N r.-a

0 N o 0 0co q; 8 0 0 z c oc 0 0 1 l0

0 I j r

N z( . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . .C

*~~~~C .0 -Z'N0?M ~ E . e . 0 C .4 , ~ C~

*~~ 0 9*O -9 3a r

m *0 -c'

04 u

o 0 ON I s5 0 IA csr-0 1 = 0 1- 4 m ,:4 , 14 0L 3NIA a 7; meN 0 CL r CM 'A V0In

06~ C IM *9 -99 9 IA 99 9 9 9 9 9 U999 9 C .9 99A9 9. . . . .9V

0 to04- C

CL IA Il 4

a -D 01CL IM4 MIn 92 k

.! I , A ) U -IC v rIg l C = .1c,. . .a cA, v .v i

X. m 0. 0. 1.* Z 42, :02 5,'

IP c9 -- -3 4 2CI . s V, - 0 - b, 71 . 0 7 1 mr42 7 0

t*v .- 94 2Cu 64 jXV4 U- 0 46 C LU 46C 4 -4C 4- 6 AC 4C 04 6LAVIZ

. .. . .- .2 .~ . 00 .

Page 130: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

AC

CI InF yIn000I

3tU N . C, oo00000000

ao In cc a,

X 0

0 0000 a6A0 00

fA 2

V C 0000

C. a

a a'

c raI2 2 10 .

IC 0cvI o000*,

I t I Na 00v00I. C . Q A -4 4L * A 4L

I- OUCO121

dp0

Page 131: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

at~ 00000000Iw 00000000

S0000000000000000

0 I f6C'&0% kt% knW0000000000 0000000000000000000CI 0OU'00000000000000000NOIA0

I . * ** . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .0 a .0 . * . . . . . ............ * . . % ****

x l f"

- -Iri F"t - "6u NME4N4 N*..1-.aoo .400 4.-4 w . , cc

*O w0 I j

I z F~04 ry4 o -r9 cooo~ N 4 . QM o0~ . 9M t9909- 040 4-4z 044

* I

* II

*C MW% 409N~It CC.C .9 .C04~' 24C~

~~~~~~~~~~~~ m~0 0 IANO C N 0~?NC M M N N - C -

0 &90-. a

c, 4 1 06 M 4 * * * * .990 ** C A *

djC- .0-

a A* I ..

0 aI C6C Lt W10M N Am3 4 V4 1' A - - 1 4W U . - A ' l ' O . A 12

11 .09 c.9 -1C 0 ,00I L 0 4. CL D LL M0C 01 L cC 0m 60 -C-

a I0 09 c a 0-- 5r 2.0 w .9

L* A4UC 06 I ov a M4 - ff 4CL

4u 00J . 0O 402 x- 6J - AM i m 4 c~c c40 0,c4 0 4 00 0 ~ U -

Page 132: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* 0

*I u

*I z 00000000000000000000000m NW 00W 0 *% * 0 * * 6% W% . C . . .) . 0 * **

I. '. . 0.i

PjNN. . .a . %4 ...

0000000000000000 0000000)

a 1 0 m fy 00. m~ 0 00I 00 0I 4 00n a,0 0 00

I fZ 1'N -4 (". 40 - .4 f" r0 tu 00 000 00 0 0 00 kA 00 000 040 0 0 00C

4; C; C;C . . . 4; * 4* **

-v 00 0 0000 0 0000000

C~

to zw- o'I-oo-Iooo oo L

Z 2 9 rI~~*44 N'N

*~ ~ r a. 0 a0c~000000O0

-e -I2c

10 mIA-mI- 0 .

'A, C A QaIi

Ia 0)( .0 C ,M" -C I & g -A 2a.

C

a C 0 C IA CL 1

'A a CL 'A

% 02 CI re01 4.' a 30 ' M

C 3 M 0 V0 - 4a r C ,. c

I j 0 fe. 4 6 C . aI 0 w4IL c 1 P.t0 Pr1.0A .wc C3 a, 9M.

S0 C9 w & 41 4 j

Page 133: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

T. w.I

at W . .0AC 0t .4 v , auj WN t- C o N-M- 420 oo -C 'D N a . N N

0 O-j N fy . in

0 M ry -4 o0 01 dI 1M o( .. %P ra %g p 0w( *0O y&aco M Ac* o9 V&- 4- . nNa Ma 04 4N 6 1 4 C m -- t

'hq 14. W*4 t.F ya Q Na p 0r -00 .r r'

4LI - w - :- 1W NP oc M ty ~I go M 40 &c 4 1 &o ow& Pc w n(P 4) W% rN F-O PI e e MNI rMM N N MM

a- N CP 4pMaNW % W -4- .r ,rrjaNM4.rP sW0 %9 Pf -4 Vc r 44N-.4 4p 0 C r Ql%0w n6 .P TM

I~~~~~~~C c;M~ 4 C;I4 0 .~d M N ~ -

K 4~"N jNr,4o.4.Q0Q0-0 ..cc coo.gN..i.4;ZO.40000000 000000000000

I tr

ccI em O P 'crw M ' '0-No.1ON M vsm 4-r 0 m W N04. ol 0 e~ M N -F 4r

uI t w d 0C N N4L coU40r~ 'O N''NiN .I..40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . *. . . . . * c* * ........

0 I.CL a

V .4. a0 N, m (IN m.i.Eg .CI N ~ c .

CL 4, b,* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m v UJ IA ,~ N - I~ . d . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0

t4 -4 C6m.0CP 0 L k C

10 .0 r& A

CL I- S. mQ C ;0 ,a C

m N . 0 ( A 0V - 0 -1

CL. 3 6 4 0C10 I

10 a L .0'A c ' c

612

Page 134: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

h ~ ~ F UN 544

*4!~ P: .~ .. . : C!P

I C in go4 to & *4 4* M * co ** M 0 & m * * 0 *44-f 7m n

0 M N rf NNW P.4 v4m 4F mv o

in .a %. .4 0 r -c'y .4f-.-C-' %

it~~. -4 , 4, o

1-.00- 0Id0 0co 0N~ co..

0 P. -40 a ~ @ N 0 a0 a-m 0 0oi~ 0~0 Ul -4 LnW PI N N00WNkl0 A

N Cc Cd0 P. 0 P. ~ tor ja 09

Ij x en e fZ f"' ON NON N N11 -0aC0 -

CL z 000 000000 000000000* . . .* . . .44 4 4 4 4 4 4 .44 .4 .** .- N 00000000000 000000000

* *0 Z

c ~ C oz -.Q~ 0 ,I 0 N 001 ~ 000

'A' a V c 3

Z6 000000 0000000000

4..

* - C

06 ~~~a j '&A c lt

L. r aO !C . VM0 6G0a

CL 'A I to0a- to A C C Vo40 -- t MAC 'A

6 1 U . *- --~ ~ 0 A 0 -022~

I A W J

6 6U~125

q'AgU -a

Page 135: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Table A2. The taxonomic groups that met th-abundance/occurrence criteria of 10/m .in at least 5% of all observations and .-the station/tow types for which they metthe criteria. The "NNNNABUND" columnhas the same meaning as in Table Al.Tow type 1 = 1531 oblique; tow type 2 =..3 5 3 p neuston; and tow type 3= 3 5 3 p.ob I i q ue.

* '-i- • "J7.

2 .6126,

• ,"---

Page 136: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.- 7 T -W, W.

m & F.000M Wz 04I 40 a O o 4 a 00

at.x % . IL06 M 10 . I .z I Z i l

0 I Ir

CO .'r

vi LU P4 N 9 U - INfIU CL L Lx .z C

I Z; .w CL LILIL- ::.tm

-.

V 1 1; 1LI I I II I I L

1277

Page 137: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *cc-NS *o -

01

a 4 PlI.P Nw l NN

0 A

r a W CP 0 UjN La aU,

'A CL a.

ILI

I 128

Page 138: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

II

z - I z NI-r P I X o4 i I Z ^ o'

.491I 1 .a zcI WI 0 1 z0

of. x Li Up

0 CL

f" - = -b-N .

LI xIIC .9I I I

I9 z I

IA LL en .9 IUm A L "f "w fj m f , Li fr ,U;P a. z C64 CLu LC

*j >-> IZ

4^ 01 1 1LM .).tULLC w LU CL5IL ; Ct V% I0 IU uI L. I

I9 I IL

I IC L I I

* I I I129

Page 139: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

g I

* Ca. mooom1 C I c X %Afj 0ie I I c v

C *

I CI I ju

I' ui U i ON IU N Ir n4 N L) L NmO< N C I A C.u LC

j U I ICL V, CL a

.4 I 601

1 3

16"W

Page 140: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

W-1 V . -

z 0:

A I

I, J

4 n*~t UN 4 r- O

w -

* 131

Page 141: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

z z NJ a .4P I0 d1 M4 ". 4# 4Nz f n4r n 4"4 4 :Il "M0-W0 6%0

1. I : -

zw in z W N "W zz

U~(A

0K le-

wK wl 6

< C6 4.v C C 4

S 4 ILU >- Lw CL 3-

6 04a L .Zm LuA LUCLL L0U~ J ~ l 4-I - w~L 4 4 L

.3 U OU ~ U 0

I- 0. I- 0 I- ,132

Page 142: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

ICI m 0 - V- oa- 0 'af .N4 -

1. M. 0 lpIn NI l Cn .. :9z~ ~ 0 I0 r N- A4 4I 1.

f I Inx O 0 , 0 04j "MA ;fUN UN _ _:2 1 - 0-4.

I 1 0

m UUW~~~~ r (A a 4 PI0 d

cd 0

VJ CL 00 0

LUU

L UI

O M S -II 0 ~ - 5~0 -- .~~, ~e-ea U L 0 NCL.4

s~~ 0 LA

-133

Page 143: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

Table A3. The abundance data for importantmeroplankton groups of the study area.The values are the means of four replicates, while the values inparentheses are the standard errors.The order of presentation is the same as _ .that in the text: decapod crustaceans,fish eggs and larvae (flatfish, sciaenids and others) and otherinvertebrate larvae (bivalves,polychaetes, larvaceans, and phoronids).Station, tow types and correspondingmesh sizes (153 and 353 micron) arenoted.

134

.C~i j~.~ ... &.. -.-.., -

Page 144: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

f.t.CONOO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h .0 0.0c o 0 0 1 4M0

*40 1;. ;1 ;C;1 ;1 ;CL - -

C9 m M 4p P . P

ae 0 cooNO .0.00 co 0 000 0. ZM 000 4

4N 9%Mf4** 42M4 4

7 *L h.( lb.. ..

CL 0 0N04P P?0-O NVMO4000 0000000' ON00 00 4- W -.* CA~~d-

co *,

*~Z; ;; N. N74 O - -. - - - -

CF 0 000000 040 0 0 0N 0m 0

0 -4 C W4 U* n0 F 14M0- 00000A'MC 1 '

- - - - -

0 ) ma JN M 4 * 0 0 0O . 00O O00N 0 0 0 0 * J

MMM '" e 0M fn MM In~) - . . 0.0 U -. 7w u z a~ c,) .i .j 0 0 0 * * * * *........ . . 1- u

0 w -4 N * 4. 0-r-- " 7

N4 -1 N 1.*1 ii~ .--------------------------------------------------------------

Page 145: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

u 4p go a, a %NN.f 0a 4WI " rrW 00

99 .9 1:-. 1:0: .. . .

at4 N 0 47 4 4 m P- *4 * * 10 *4 * 4 4 *

- - - -* 4 a

z* 4 f*of..

* cc V4 4u * ZOOANO '

0 00-P N ~ ~ ~ J 4

-C~

0 A. 4 Uj

I* - - - -- --- -4 -

I N 4 10tOO c M.N4 0 co 04 1 IO4 000

- - -

*U 3clocaw 303 3D loc 3003.O1040 0o m:ww 3 a 300.loco 0wo 4

-M ZW M = j M 6u W 4t . 2wqU A 4. iwu11 01 n A 0 -4NqM00 a0 A z L. r 4 a0 40 -wo- zo 4)c *aN

04 ,a N N 4 m 4 "Nm

* -~1360

Page 146: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - -wv . E ~ ~ T~ - - - -----

L* *

* "

S 00c.oo00 0Mn O0 0 0-.dN00 0 a

.L -- --- -- -- - - - ,-. - --,* 44 oo4 4.o o.4 4. 4 4.o.o ... ....o*oo

a O0 a O0' P- O0" 400NC 00 O O c oO00000 *" -"--"

C& O 00004" 6 NN00 0000 000 O 4 ;N ,"O 0.00

.4

- - -4 - -

w * c

6-• 6n CL .- . ..

of 2* z

•~ ~~~~ U. A • 0 OO0O 00 • O 0C04.O' ,0 , 0 0 D N N " 0 0 r ,0 N 0 *

to CL oo o*o0o i ii!i- - OON -f 00 000O 0 000l 000-00 0 0

Comma 4 N 4 I7

* * 4 oo o --4o o • o o oo4o o -

• * - * *

-*0 4 41 4 0 00 00 MO .. ,.4O00O ,.0O 00 0O ,. p .4.. OO00O O 4 4-•oo o ~ o ~ f ~ . a ~ o . o -, -...

9 6M 0 .

• •-.- *

- - - - - - - -- - -

0 0 4 r "o rCM4

*0 x *C!C

-w * 0O "0 0- 00

". I, .-"n. 0 .. . " .

. & .. _.:._ ..... 0 ..,;_A 40 .. .. ... . . .-. ... .. . . . . . .. ..... . .j-- ,v.

N* 4m 0 N.44 M 44 ----- 44MM.~. .- * OL*.~* UW 4137

Page 147: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.TV

*~~, . 0 We-.d

40 -4 - -

0, u 4.-4MO N ON4 40 N 00 w4 N1.0I N 0

*~~~~~ ~~~~ M LNN ~ ~ 0 ' ' sE O O . O ~ ** 4 O OOOO OOOO OOO

* -i l~ 1 .9 V: *** ** ni* .

11 40(P f"OOC .r NNO NONCJe ~C ~ 0 0J 0 5 4), C 0, 0 0 0

46*

cc 0

0 0 4 4,0m

c CL

1. - -4* * 4* 4

vi -a 01 0M S.~ 5-S CL4~~i5

- - - -

X 0 CL 0-4s- N N O0 O 0.- O 0 00 * 0 4 0O O -N 0 0 0 a OOa O 0 (D . O 0

- -J -0 - -

OOO0 * * -~o

CI 4 4,N4

*2 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -

*i as 4 4F 4 N4 4-s a 0QO *a 0 0 *N

N 14- ^4 NN N.N.N.N.N.N. N.N ......... m

mf 04 C) O0dON N0 Q a~O 496 4q 0a .4Az- 1: ;

Z 4 A z~ -3 4

*~~~N sn a * -

~ 4000 0O.~~i.O0 00 'O0 00O,~'O138.

Page 148: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

4b4

CL -4 - -

:..... ...b

of 0 000oo 00 .40 (;a 000000004 O000 w00 o 0

.-.. ..' 4

- - - - --4 - -, -" - - - - - -- - - - -

r 4i

0 400 mW0 0 0 *00 oe 00

*

* .-

* 4 *

0 0 00.P000 m000 P m 00 O , 0 0 0 Go..

*~- IM, - E J O 04

? - : :, : " -'. "

-w 4 *( 4

W4% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4 . :. ....- ..-~: :. ....-.

. 000 4L 0OM.000.-40000 0 C N0 0000

* 44~• o ..-4.

-~~~~~~~.o. -. -. - -------

96 .0 .S 0 * _

..-

* Cr UN IN-0C 0nN 04r T0- *V1

(W2 0N 000 0 - N 0 4

9 -4 42wu u C C-

4-0eIV en .4 r4I i 1

* ~ 41C9

4 Cs

Page 149: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

7

4 w a4 P&mr dP r y0(-11 4 gl n 49 i

4 4 L ----------- w- - -

4 4C 00000P aF-0 0000 P 0 000000000000 4,I"roa f

0cc 99 i i in i il Ni9 9 I 4i ooi 9 4

* Lrn'

* j 43E r4

* K 4 a* 4 4 4

cc C 4 U C~ N . 44E~ 4 M ~

C, c

co 4 lo -4 - -

o 0 F 4 e I !

4 -* 4 U

*~lelofo aD 0 4ro - o

* ~ 4

*r ., 4,4

* * -140

Page 150: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - --- -u - - -- -- - - - - - - - - -

*P l 4 D - 0

* 4 0000 00000000 000000

. w . 4D aa-.a.

S 4 00 0000000 0 a C0000

S" " :4 ...

* • 4 ". ".* ". -

* : . .,4' .

* *D 00c 0000 = o -," 000000000 O00-0 -00,00 00 4

0', M 0 0 0"0-4.".'-'."

* 0 0 0 !- 3 0 n 0 0400o0 0

- - - - - -

Cc - _ -.

.-,.4 .oo . . . . .

* ~~ ~ j 4I 13 CL0~ E 0 00 C O 4. . .

% - a . a . a N LP .4

4 00141 - ..

4, .4- -.- :t 4" -- 4 , '° ., . -- ,.',

* * r-'i.c-...-~..C C4 0* .~ 4 - 040

---:: .. :. . '.,.- .',: 4 ", .. -4..- . - .. . , . - . . . . . . . -. . - . . .. . - . .. - . .. - .. - . . .

Page 151: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

II

41 4 "''- 0T tl~o -4 '0 " 0 "4'0 * ,,.J ,'

-: - -

4 * 400 ,000 00 00

--, - - -, -. -. --

06 0000 00 00 0 4

4 P

* U a U 0- 0 N ' 0 ~ 0

4w - - -. -- -' .

* 4-, * , . . . . .- .

P:=- X 0 o o 0-°.

4 41 4 10a0110 r(

C4 44 < - °4:U..

4 ~ 00' 4Q Q .

4 ... ... . . -'*

- 0-0 00(3 000V, 00 0, , "0.00 .

4W

--- -4

* LA. 1

0 0.,0 . . ...

~ 4 I ~ 00 -4

L)1 oD N 0y 0 0 0a 0 411

4 4 . - - - -,-- -

-3 : , 0 ,

VIJ 4. C

a- 4 c o o o-0.0oo 0000 0o 0 4.42

* t4, 4 4 '..- - - '

4 : .: 4..,,,.W.- * = 414-:.-:::

4 C 41 ~ ° o o '.--':Wo .4-o

4 ~ * 41 - - -- - - - - - - - - -,

.... 1 . . . .. . .. . . ..41 .-- .... .. ...... .4 .... . ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.- ...,. . . . ...... . . .. .. . .....-. .. . ... . ._ . .. . .. . ... .

Page 152: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* *.;.coo a0 4 - - '. '

S 4,- 0- 00 000.. . O0 0 0 0 0 -.. *9.. *?

-: -- - -

00 a 0 a 01) a0 C

C: It C!....... C

4) 4, 000C.;00000,_.,-4-.4.0.o

4: --I 4

4 4

- - - -

----I -- -----

Z Z4 M t -4 fI~ 1;D

-3 *l UI *4 *o I X4 AW

.. .o..0o 0 0-400 0 ,

14

ooooo o oooo 4:N0,-.NO-4,.0"I.

4 . .-- 4

4 - 4 -4 . .

4 :w 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

, .#: : * .' ........ .. .......... ° .... . % .4.-- . .. . -.- r. ,-,.. . . -.... . ...

Page 153: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

r~ ~~ ~ - -- -r -r -, - -- - - -- - - -. . . . .

- .- -

C9 ~~~ °. - .oo o NWILI-

LU~~~..o -. . .....

*1 4 *

- - - -- -- -- -~- - -- -

• 0000000 00000 E

• "*

c o 0

4 4 ! 4t..°

* ........ ~~S.'0 .4.=.N... 4 • .

o ~ ~ c oo .. oo ooo ..-- ,

* 4 01 . *.. 4

z _j 41 . . . .

A _2 z °- z. AAI144

4 4 *%°

4 4P 400 - 0 0 0 ." .

r,.,.,: -

* * 0................................

1444. . " .'

Page 154: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

"a

S4 0 m 0 0 w 0 0 0 -- N0 - *r 1 w N " - ,

• 0 C 0 0 . ,0,0 0 0 0 .. r,- 0 N O" 0 -w 0 fn C 0 0

- - - -- -,

.4 4 0 . 0 N 0 < c - .4 0

*l -* -

* x 0 0 0 00 0 0-400 m0C.;00 C 4

* ** -o o - 4 .7 N

* 4 4

0 C,

_.: z .CL* -• - - . .- -

** .---- - - - - - - - - - - -

4 * Oe J o o * -"-''

*1 4 - .

. 4 4 o

-- ..-- 4_4;'

- -* --- -- -- - - --- -- -- -- 4

4 0- 3 -0 0 X, ~0 C 4

0 o ~0. > Q x j CL43.z 4 m .3 zl 4u0wl C

x 4 " : 4 Z L3 Q 4~

4 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ l A :1 O0 0O ' 0 0 0 J,~ 4O .4 00

* & =. . . . . . . .... .. 1 . . .

Page 155: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - - ---- --.

P.~~~ a .- -00

LUL

* 4 1

* * *. . - -

S* = 4p

* * 0t• 0-4"* r * 0 P-40,- 00 P 00 •"*" ""..,.

4 4. 4. ' . -

0 - - - * -

o= * .....4

*- . . 4= : = . *. .*=. * o o-o oooo oo 4

*. 4= *4. ..

4' * 4 o *.. . . .

4 * * . . -

CC 0

* 4 4 ° - -* * 4 4*. * 4- 4*. .. .

. . . . . . . .. . . . . . ----,-..

% c

.* . - 4 .4. . .

*-. 0 4 ,- ' t . 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ..-

4 w - ] 4 6- -" .'

CL 4( 00 4 a

- -u 4---- -- -- --

m4 10 go 10 0' O 0 0 ale -1 0u L :.. . . .. 4*,.

0 49 A '00 01 0A 4-w~~ N 1

~----------

Page 156: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

4b

0 crc .N 0.a rmmri, 41,4

CL -* - - 4

.4.....~N... .... , ..* ONO 0,00.-40000 *1 ,.."

• e ,

+* : : *

.* 4 * - *

- . * , .,. ..

4-. * ••..:' *

* 4 * 4 0Ps00< ,+

, . . -

= *' 4 ) _ 41. .•. . .-. . , , .

* * - * I1_"0 4

* 4 • .

* 4 4 0.0rr- 00 *

WA+,

4 .. .4"

, " 144 0"'-+0N-0000

-- - -

*4 nt0 4

*."0' 4 4

,'. C)-

*-4 IL 4 - -4.J* e~ 4 C~4 y~W 4 CL4

- - - - - -. -4 -

4 4 4

0 4. V..

* Li w C0. 0 o-0 0

14

Page 157: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

4i L4 U

06 -* - -

4~~W a 0 0 0 0 -6

* * 000 0 00 0of 4

* 4

* 4cc-- - --- - - - - -

* W.No0d~O~

vi c;E ex0 0 0 00 0 0

4- .. a * 4r- *t 4

004'A 49 4

* A O000 01

-4 - - -

4 0 co 00C ,00 ~ 0 0

-4 - - -

Q4 w -U 61 4Z- tL 44- dgV

48

Page 158: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - - - - - ..- _.-+.-,... - -_

- ------ -

I.

o .4.

.-" * 4 .1o o - o= = o

"%" 4 41 " "

41 41 . . .~. . .

+-'1 , 1,... . .** .o .- . .. .- -

*+. * 0 0 • , , , * * * 4 *

t .'s= •41,

ce1

* " , * . .-.- M-",. 4.4 . 4

r* - *

41" 4 . "'41.,,.

.1 41.

LU 4

,.- - -,. .- - -- -- --, -+

41 V*' : ,1 V4

4-+. 41 : -M' -1 N 4.

- * ,..... .... ............ ..... ..... ,,,,.....4

.' , 41 *a 4,1.

r.1 4 .) ,1 i --

4. - 1 0 4-~ - -1 - - - - - - -

- - - - - -- - --O -0-- O - - -

.. . 14j -") IL.....c...,*. .- o. .x

A0 41 n o r1 3 c

'~41 0~ w N - 4 a .4 4

~ LW 1 0 0-LI -~140 4

Page 159: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* * = ,...,,...,.40e 9~ 4* 0---iN O 400 0 0-4, 4•0 .

w 4% 4w 4-

- --- - -0 --00 -- -- - -4--o000----004,----..iN----W D mw -.* .4

* ~ t 0 0000cc0 0000000000 00 .. ~00C000o.......4................................... *9 .

Mo 4d wd - M*N4 o:4c o00 0 0 a l O ,r

0 at

7 Vii b,• " -

* * -* " 1O_

a* 4 4j0* 4

C4i IP Ir- UN00 a- 0 z 0 a, go 4Q 4. JaI 0,- N4 6% .0 0 0~ 4 0 4 4

,,b: .- ' - .x C3 O0 C 0 0 0-0000N 4'.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0 0 0 0'0 4

4 " 4 .1

- -~ -

4r c & N 4

r..* 4 e 0 0

•. . . . ... .0... .N ..

en W 4 a4 c c

4 414

* ,- 4 . . .. .*~.. ,-. . ., . .

4 04p

C E - 4 -- --

.-. V. 7 n r -N f 7 ,04.m af .6%f 4Yr

-.. , ---- ----

.- 0do 4 . , ... I.. .... 9 9.9.4 f". OD. . .. .. .

4-m 0W m - - 000 0cc ag cad 0c 0a C4 00 00-doON430 00 40C C 00 W O fClCCM-W00 4

.U 00

.. p. 4-6 IL 4~ 49u j i W IWM 4 1 . ,W4W 499 44 -U le'44. AAa. 9=0 111 LI t MA0-

- . 1. *"4" '" -"

4. J- M 0 9999999999g. 9.. .. 9...9999.. . . . ....

M4 .- 09 N .4I 4 4 0: ol*-qN- 'o 4-

-.[-i 150 -

4• o .

Page 160: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

ii. ...W%0.-.- N,-.0 N

Mm4fM f0:l f ~efM f , 1...-

- - -* - -

. . . . .

O c ": . . ..

a 0~ - ---- ----- ---- ---- -0 0 - -4 --t 0 ~ - N --

-~~~~~~ ~ 9 9 4* ** * * 19 . . .... . . 4 * * *

004000 000000OWICE 00mo000 a00 0 0P OM0000NO0

*' . :

------------ °---- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -* coo 000€ N.0000 0 ,0 00 -.- , c o.

* * - * L .0-.

• * * .A*" * 5, • *

Al - 4

73 .CD" -

* 0 C!

.- .. ...... .. ..:o

• ~* : * = •..-.

- - - - -

• *** .-..?..

* .. .. . . ...-. .. .4 -V.-.'-. . - .-. _ . . . ,,. .. .. . .. . . ... .. . . . . . , - . . . . ._ . . . . . . . .

o a 0 o- - 00 0 000 0 r-- -- o -0.0 -0.

e - 0-_'0 . .- 0 0a 0 a 0 0 w 0 0 0 a N

.r .- j -w 4 bi% 9ni

P: 1:~ S.. % 9 .l 0 31 % 1

M 06 4 In 00,000wa4 F y C 1 4

w"C* .- O 00 00000 40 o aN03woOwwr'owq00 0 0 000 00,r.-C .00 !V

3, -1~ 42- -99CX 11 - 4

NN4 M0 42 44- M ' 4N yM0N-

* i~,*-~151

Page 161: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - - - - - - - - - - . .-.

ry .0 M --v .r.'.

A ,; n,-_. , f4

• • ~ co o 00 0 4N r &V Nr ,r : , 00 0 00 0 00 '. 0-0 00000 't. e %

4b

• • '.. %"-'

SP 4Y NaDo

a - . .

4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0f 0 4 0 0 0 0 0< 4 0O

4 u 4 u . -

• *.. * * *** **. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . . .4

of-

*,J 4- - 0 0 00000 " 0 N'0') 0 0 0 "00"0000000N00 N "D ' 000O 00 * . '-

4 4L I ... . . . . . . . .-: ~ g . . . . g * 4 * 4

-- 4 8 00000000000N N 00 000 000000N0.ro00o000

4 6 -- - - - -'

IL -1 LA %".-: "%-.

9 ..... o . .g

w• x

.. ,, ,.. ,.'..' -,, ,;, .,...-_.- .-- -- < - - . - -. -. - - -- - --- -.. . . -. , .. . -. -.- -. . . - -. - -- -. -

4 w4 44 w4 wf. - M

* 4 4

%I N N yNNr yt yf 4' ' , f

*6 - 9I 1- 4 0xz00L.u 4 c4 Lp N4,o0%- r0N . - owwmN 4 o

*N ml- N 0

* 4 152

Page 162: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.4. 4 .. .,... "

4 4-------------------------4

. . . . . .

r* a- # w 4, n-

• 4 00000000040004000000000000000o0000 "z 4 4 C 4 1 1 !I1 9 1

* * • j0

LU .4

* ---- -o- o- ---- -----.. . .-

CieO 00 o 00.40 .-do00 0 00,-0z j 'A . . . . .* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . . . . . . 4

uj 4

C o

• " 4 -z 4 ."0.• ,..1.- * 00

-

4) .1 4 3- a

.,. C , L -. "

e--. LAC ) ' '' *L)4 - 4. • - 0 0 0 000 (0 00d0 0 00000 000000:3 *: t4 4 KS ** SS * *

*3 o ,,.,3 4:,.., -.x M~

• •0( 3000 30( 000 0 (3' -' o 0 0 •"''

ccC

4 03 4 *

•~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~1 9 d P0( " 300 3 1 -C! i 100 " % " C! 9 O00,10 0, , ,

-4 0 4 4 •••••••• ••••••••

4 p

*. .. 9 (3 .9 1 9 *30 00 9 *: %*0! °. 9 S

0000Ic ccco0000001VOo 00000 *

* 0 4 51-0

a. :. enwor- mom :r c moJ roV 0 00 .4X•L I

*4 44 Ad V41 4 yNr 4N1 Nr Nf ""

" 4 -4" -o ac * -1, 000 0 4A'IIA1,Z* . 4 ~ ~~

..... . . . .. . . 4 4

: ~~~153. .T'..

.' 4 • , . . . . . - . .4.. . % * . . . * . . . , ... .. " . .

Page 163: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* . - ..*-

oI.....

: o -.,- -. --.-- % - . ' .-..7-

o .,

• 4) i I 1 4. 0 wI 0W 0 '1.*a 0 0

I. *= * .t, " t* ( ' ' ' tttI*- r)=" ''r.

= - 00 .O .i .1 .4 ,P m- 0 .* 9% z 4 w~ 0 p F.. w in -C k 0 a. ry m f-. 00 e-% %

0 * 4 4ag 4 m I44C!

• u oy .4 ,ow -

4 4

6- -"

ex 04... .. .... . . . . . . . .. . .

%A 4U **

* 4, O- 0#O 0 0 0 0 0N0 0 0 * ""''"

46 -

mo of m 4 -.* " * '" 000000.00 '0.d 000000000000000,*000.000 0000

X

L-L. LA :0 3¢

•~~~ 00000 O q 3.€0 000 coo0 00 0 O0 , ....

z 4

* * h*

* ~ ~ 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a N. . .

*~~~~ 00 00 00 0410 N 0d 0 0 4 0 0* . 0 O 0 4

* * h.C - 4~' . ©o ° " :.-""'

* 4 hqu 4*; ¢d d ( ; ¢; g; .;' d d d d

U6' 'K0

N FY ,N N 4 .4.N.%*

154 *

"* . . .. -. - - . > - ' ' . " - i . , - - - '- . - ' , . , - .*' v.. . -. 4 . .. . . . -.4- '..- _ .. . .- . , ,4 - . , 0 . , ._ ' '4- ,4'. ,, ,' € _''' _,_ '' . ' . - '. '- - " " - - " " ' '

Page 164: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.4 4

.. . .. . . ... . . . . . ... .e% n e5 el %M 5

4; 4; 4; C; 4;C ; C ;4 ;C C ;C ;4 ;4 1 ; 4 ; 1 ; ;C

0 co 040.400 a 00 0 o 0,- 0 0 ,. - N 00000

* : _ _4 - - - - - 0-N-- 0- - - - -- - - - - -- - -4

* f 4 0. . a *y a. a * a. *0 . *aa*** a A 40 y * *" ; a..a.a* o o ooooeoo oo o ooo.-o.ooooo o ooooo o

uii

* W4 f-

L wa. 0 10

* 00000000400N0000O0 00o.000-0o 00o~o*

C _ o* . -Z-.

r 0 4 4

.. I4e

4 ... a...... * ....... .. .. . . . .

* 4 5 0 0000~m00 0000000000 000 00 00 0 0 .

• a- 4 4 •

-* - - - - - -

! C: : : . . .

*%

...............l ..... ...............** * • _I

o 0 0 0 0 0 0

:* . . . ,,I..:I .l

'wIx. z , 0 4 0 a. 6-000x,

.4 N 0.z *

In N 44

U.11 155

Page 165: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

n Ls e% 0- el0 0

•~1 C: 11 -.- .

0 f4 C* 4- 4w0 m00 %m00" 0N0mt

• • 000 0 N00 0 0 0 0 a00 000000co 00 00 4; 0 0 '_ 0_

• . -4

- - - -- -.

* U Lq .4 0 .C~ . O .i .. N . .;9 - 000 0 0 -0 0 .

4 A 4

a 4

*y IV -4*I

o, . . .. .. . . .; ;C . .. ."

.1." * 4 : - 0N - U 09 4 0 .. 0 0 4,0".'.'.0.0 '4

*: , 4, *9 **** * 9 9 9 9 9 . . .- * * 4 .. .

* 4 0 -i 4

• 7VI z•zz 7z-

< * 4. & '%;.'.4%

• 4-. -°.q * °

* - --- --

-J 0 • Q0Q 0 C0 N0N 0M •

* W * "i,...

• 0 4 M4

C! - 4 C!

4 N~ 4y N4 y^ "mfM " m-4mmM

3 ,. . - j , CL ,L I t, , m w .e . 1' , .. ). z. .3 0 , .0 . :,,.1 u .... .

= w= *w u

4 - 4 C4 -

4 . 0 X4 .

LU N m4" 1a1m p a

156. -., -. . .

.' : .'L ". ., - .- - .-.-~ .--- .' . -.- -.- . , .. " .-. . ,4. , -, . - ., ., . . , . . . - . . - . .' i - " .".• 4 00------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 166: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - - - - - --- - -- - --.-.

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .to- CL- -. --------

0 ; 0'O 00 ,ID 0 0 0 00 00 - N M O ,0 040 0 0, .N.-@*.

cc z 4

44Z U, .

4.., IR NOOC,= 0 0 "" 4'

4-AIPO0 0 4 *C6 . ". om

* 4 - ... * -_ ..L

-- - -- - - -- - - ---- :m

* 4 4 - 000 .C000 00000 0000

00000000000000000000

* -4 - - -

N Nl N-P4 fy 0 .. N SN0 M0 "I "m 0"-r"f"f"1-

a 10 10 0 1 00 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 4 10 4

0 C4C .4 X 00 0Z 0 0 0 4 X A 43

q* 4 - • •

4 f N e" -N- --

157

• . O0 O0 (3 000004' 0 O 0 N 4t' 0 • - .""-.

O0 0 0 O 00000 0000 4Z* - * **** *

0I- 4 0 000 00.,r 4 " " •

• i,411002124• . • ..-.4-.

•~~ ---.- , ,

*4' •2 4

4 z~z157

J', .,j. .. .. .., '*,J ", ". '. _. _ . . .- _.-"-". . . , .. 4-"" 4-- _ _ ."" ' ' ' . . . .' ' " " ' ". . .' " ' . - .. .• . * L ,k . , %

"* ""**"

* %" '

' '" '

* %"

%

Page 167: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -. --tf

* 4.1" . "b

S. . -d n

.* 4 .. -ft..? . .1 -1,

'0 0

4 1 41

* 4 41 % %-. f .. I

- -- - - -41.*.II. f.t.I .h .f0 4. 1 .. . t ft

00 Uf0 O 00 0 O0 41

x a ft. ....... .0 ooo onn a .

41 4 41

41 41 J 00 0 ,- U N.000- d 00000 0M0 .'"0 41'

41 41 u .. '.. . . . . . . .-- ".t..ft 4

41 41. 41

4- -1 - -

- N -n 41 N

SN N 00 0 0-0-Of O 0 NO0 41

"-41. 41 C , 000 00.c0o0 0 0 0 00,0.00 41 --

C, ---- ---- -.....---- -

41 41 : ," 41~ ~o o o41 41 lAO 4

m CL - a f m -

41 0 4,S 00N0-d.. gd ,., N0 0 ' ,'O 0..0 ,@.4. 0 41' " '""* * r u . ....... . t t f f t t 441, ~ 41 0 0 000 0 0000 0 0 0 '00 000 41 ,"• - _

41mm 0 14

z ,j C. r. 3* "I.3'..

41-f.---4,.-1

-1 -1 C1 41C.-41 0 41 41P0

41 = 4 4 .ftf.

1 5800 -f .O p4. N -41'

.r .158. ..

6 ; -. ." , . . -. -, .- - '. --- -. . .' - - :- . .-. -.:--< . ; ,-0.0 0. -. , ...0- :-.0 0. -. - .,00 0.-:-. .. . .- . , . ..0,- ..41. -

Page 168: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. - .., 41 41 41,

a - - -

41, * '0 0 00 ,4 ,- eV 000 N00O4 0, .. *- 0

1 41 4l N€l~ 44-0~ l4

4134

41 41 440." 41

cc v N a-0 0 m 0 m#0 m1 N 0 4 ,, " N N

41 11 .- 100i9 0no: 9s. 90 0 % i -o.) 41 41" 41. .44-

4p C

- -e - - -' -4 - -.

C' 41 .* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..* *4 * 4 ' 4 • 41.'- .

af o o * -

41 41 0O000-I00 a 00 0 0O0000000 O 0 000 41. -.* * 41.

*o X

a ., . o . .... . o - o . . . . . .. .- -;';ty 0. N moooPo ooo 0 0 o oo oo z o4m No 0

* 4' 41

* 41- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --

aL :m49)

* 4 41 % O N,444 ~ %s - ~ ~ - ~

* 41 .400..0. o o o ,O.,~

* 41 .4 ONOO O 0 000 00r-0-00

. 5 .' ."

-.. -- .. -,.--41--

c! 0: 99 94 N . . .4..

41 a- -1 - --- - --- ---

o41- roCoo o0 o T 0 o1 o8ca 1

41 NNNNNNI m m 41mmmm "mm "m

41-'A X Z L6 -1 41- . ,0

-. 4 0 N14- N 9'0 *0 040 (P 0 m4 r420 4- 3 0 f"NVM

N1 -U. -4 ONmNfl. N N41

0~ -~ 4 0.159

Page 169: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-M 0 1 I..le rvI;4

* 4

4 4IL%

c 4 ,

4 ~~ ~ 400 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 4k.

4 4 ~i 44 4 -IV

-4 ---- 4 -4

4 SL 4 .4-400 4

4-) ID000000000-60 00 0000

3c u100 00000c 0 0c0 00 4of m

4-- ---------------------- 44 3 40

W 4N

4 4p

4y -~ 0 q

4no 0 o o c o 40

a -m40 o a -0 4 0 loN O

~~m . j1 24 x.O 0, 0 0 0 0 0 .- 00 000.

Cu) -aA. 9L4 u0 L

40 oj 4"2 44ou 3- LrqI 1- AAo.4 N 4,QWa rQ -4 0rje

4 U...i160

Page 170: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

i% %- * .'.. " . %

11 e, "A0 :I1*l1 :Ic

;z z

O 0 40 C 1N CO ON ccc O 000 " N NI .4..I •0

•. . . -. .'.%. .%.°

• I 41 NI%

r* 00 -I -.. - -------

4 I - 0 NN0 0O0 00 0 N€00 0 • *.~*'

* NI • l 0000000 -000000000 € 0 €00 •I

0C) 0 C•C

-: - - - o- - o o o - -- '--.---,-.-. - -

|~V .A- ... . .. .:_' .

=I , "

co O -- ao o o o o•r 000o

- - -. -- --. - --- - - - -

4t, - -- - -" - -

NI N 6 N O N,.-

. • *. *

*~~~O NI NI COL.N'~0 . . . N

S- 000 .00000 0 00 0 Q

40 NI N .. 4* * m** *N N 0. *4 0 N N N

N- NE .

-," -". -,, - ,_ .I . - NI _,_ ,, N,.- ,I- ,. . .- •-, . . .•. . . .. , ' . .. • , .- ". - . -.

Page 171: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

0 A

41414 % . :,% "

CLJ

coo0 coo0000 ,- 00-* 00 cc 0 .* C

C9 a 0" ,... 0 4 1

* 41*

41 kA 4 n. ~ P E4

: . .. . . . .

*~~~~ - 0 000 00 - 00 0 00 4

* 4 -d* ' -4--

* - -- 4, ,41O O O ,

tA 1 fN 000 000 0000 y 0 00

* - * 41 O*O OO- 4O*ODO 1

* - 41 - 4

• J ' 0 00 • c .:w

L 0 4 -

.j . ." .% . ..

ui * 4"

0 0A .

0 000 w1 CP41e

N ey 1 y .f N 0 - 0% 1" m

*lx IO 0.0 0 ' 0 Z 10,'o0 W,0. 40 i 41. 10O

cw 41 -4 x .1 41 .I - W- . Az lf1 01 N41 0 y 0-0 2,O'o 3 00 - 4

. . . . . . . .. . . .

0. • 1 s C4 "" t .s l "" l 41 00 - 41 e,,* ,

=41 ° ,41 %- 41

Page 172: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-.. - °~~*N~**~ X U V P.~S4 a

* *. ,

C 06

2* --- - - - -- - - -

0 0000000 0

- - -'' -- - - - - - -* 0 000oo0*ooocoacooa

*N *.. ...... .........* * .- '...

*- - - - ,-.-..-.

- - -0 o - 0 o oo-o 0-o-o o o o o - - - -p .- -

* 0000000000000000000CL A

*I A

0 *

6m: V) ... .......... ... -. -"---"

0 6 ----- - - -.-

m 6x (MOa- 0 a 00 I0 4N 0 0

4, a 00

a 0- * " '

1. .- %

* ~. 0000000000000000000 •

"0.0N000-.0. a An Z .w...... . aL). 9 00 05440 . .-

* 4' ,.

c4. .z

a ,

163

:-.,.,-.= ...-- ,-,... .. . ,,.4 . . . ... , . . . .- . - , , , . . . . . .. :a .. ,* .b.'-L * a "

. . _ .' . ". .. "

Page 173: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. . .ITT. . .

c C,

ICA ES -l - - -~ - - -*

0 pi 04 00 0 0 0 0 E co

toe

-----' -, ---- --- -

* S0 "5 S.. 555 " * SS," 555....- 0 * 0 ES0j,,% ,

'-. -S -. %

41. 0 W.4 w

* ES 4. " ES

" - - - E -

- -- -0 000 .40oo000N - -

ES. ES 1 O O ,O.4 00 00 0 000 ES4t

(00 ES CP. -E ~ 0 .40 ES t

E* ES N 00 00 E0i0 0 0 E

ES . .. . - "

ws 0 .. " ................ 0 " ,O 0

ES:ES £ * s e. .. . *5 5** .- ..-

ES ~ C 0 SE

m L 0N0N04WN40Nm4 0 ES E

• o ooool o Co roooo coo*~ 09 0

ES 1 ES on• 0 N Amp • •4 - . e. E. ,

o 0- E000 E

-E E- -ES L-t-- .,.

• *. /..°.- /% CoSo O'o VE, ES. o -o.O . ............-......-.-...-... •..- ......-.... •...........ES .._'._..'.:" .- CS .E ,0.. ES,' 0'0,00,0000-0.00_',.,_ -V L...L;.-_,0.- .". 0..4'. 0.-_.-,-_,..,..-,-., ES.-, -'-' ' "-' 'u 'L .' ' "

Page 174: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. . . . ... .. . °=

• . ° • .

0 ". a N a c-.

*0". 'Coc

. ..-.. ..o*.- o o* -'- ••

*~~ - - -N~ -- -- - - -

19 C*i ! . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. %.' .4

* J ('W 00000 a0 - " N 0 d 00* 0 0*, oo o00 *

•0 ... ., .... .-..-.. .

* * •• • • * • *

* ---- -

- . :-

.. .. .. .. . * , ..9

........ _ ...00~ .. N ........... - 0.I, :

* 9 ."1

* .- . -

0N~ff~~4d~..4 000 0 0...f4".0 0

00000 -0000 0000 OON.m000 *4f: *000 0NN NN0 000 00 00e 00~o-.00 00 00 VO N ffI000 000ff0NI*ff000 *. -'

,* "* ' '.''

; ,.-: . ?.__. ; ".' : . _--" "- .. -i. .:.. : , .. '- -,.- . .... . : .,-.--"- ,- . .." . ._o . .: L .; .,'?-" ' - - - -"?. .i., . . . . ...? .,2 . . -" , ".? . .?.i.?. ". .*/ .- . .,...9 ii

Page 175: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

WZ~~ I K70

. . .-. . . . . .. '.... .

.p. -%

a ° a ° cc* . S, *. .

ac - - - - - - - -

.... OOUNOO .Cooo oo0o0oooo o¢oo.o0Ooo0 * --: ooo "O.. ..................000..... ..

z *j- - - - .-- - -

* * -' - - - - - - C c0 0* * N " M~-€ MM' N-*%NM% 00 N Cr........ C..... *" .

* S S: . S, -

* - .- --

. :~ *"oo . . . ......p0o o o00o000 ... N...0o .• - - 0 ... . o..* o S

*: *j : *

-------------- -

--- 0 0 - 0 -0 -

-,~ oSo ,,=,,,,o ""' .. S

* o,,,S

: i w:w:m-.!. mom

S -0 S ....... 00000.. .. 0000000-- 0000000 -000-'

.0. z m z

16:

~ , .. . . -St

* U 5 0...for...._0..166.0 0 'S N - "0 ""

Page 176: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

"W.

Z -W

- - -

4%N..O-r..--*'..-

) . . .

40 at coo 00N0 0 0 0 4

-- - --- -

o 0 o o Z o

- - - I-:

991-o9 ..... . !9.9.. . .... _91

.,,-~C :, z , .'...

. ~ ~ ~ .--r.--

L 4 O. .OON ..... OOO ................. '

-4 167

* ,, :4,, o°° o; " o o o.o o o ° : ,, o~ o :. . .• ".4' 4

............ ..... ,, ................

-- E%.

* 4 O O4%.a f.~...~q~f .OOO4.',-0f..OINO0.* 4 O O~C.NOOO COO0 OCOOC O..J ... e OOO . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 67",-4%.'+J.4.-..4 . . ..*; ' ., ...-.,,.........; .. ".-....,.-.,. ... ,....,,' ,.'.'.-......'.-,....'.,.,,.., -.. .-..... ,...r..w...',.; ...

4...]

Page 177: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

W.. .

e-. ..

tz C,

-. --v -

c-o... .a.m.

\. ~..-%,.v o-°'.

0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~F " a 7 00C 0a

. : 4 ,t 1

4J4

. . . .0.. ol.... . . e

* L1 4 0 - ---- - -

z* - -

* 4 . -,4

:~ -,, -o -- o- -- o- ----o- - o- - ,-o-°- -- ; - -

.. .. ...0N00 00 Z; 0 m_ I ; z4

I . o

* * : . . . ......O~V 0 0 .. 4

*" a 4 - " "'

*: IU- 4

4.- -" 4 *"

oop

. 168*- . -.4 4

0.). a * 4168 ".W.4",-

• '. '"." " " " ." . '.;.'' . '''. ., . . - c -¢ .C.'l'-.-. '.4: l .- ' -

Page 178: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

, . . .

,.4I.v ~ ~~~ 04 c.--c cc C

- - - - - - - ---- - N-- - --in -

z w

e00 ." -. . . . 0 . . . . . . .

o1 cc-..: c> cc< o ~ o oo.o

- - - - ---

* *,,.U,,0 0 0 ' 0 0 0

, *,.- . . .:.-

* 00 0.-000 00-.00. 00 00o

rII.

"6

.

• *.* *.

- 4 - 4-:

* 4 6. .. 0 . 0. . . . 0 .0 . . . . ...ie 0 a[: : -

* 4 .. ,

* S * . . . ...4. N0 0 0N 0 0

-,S *6- *- .. \ -

Page 179: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-'.%'5*

C!C . ..o o .:

= = ..

4 00 0 . -. J.

* o4o 4 #.'. co*o

• 4

T, . . .

OO*O c 00080 0 0

............ ..........

=. . u: ' 0 00

- - - -

* 3:. * 9 4

* 4 - 0:OO 00 i0 W~ 00* 4 000N000000000000.0000004

° 39

,, 4 4 -.:: .

-* 4 4"o-

- -- --. -'j

* 4p

............

.r-0N.".00"-."..".

0r-.l .m. C....... .. ". .....N

0:N:ie 00, ..-,..,,*00

*l.. 00 .. .. .. .

*" :m : '::::

*"• . . • . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . ... . ..;..', ..;...-.,- .: ...: :.:. . .: . : . : . . ..: . .. . . : . .... . . . :...... .. . .,.....0.. .. .. ..4

Page 180: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.•-.- .- ,

%* . ' .N .

c C'* 1 ~ .i. 0000€ 00. 0 .... .

.9 1 9 i

* 0 4 ,". "-

Sr *0 0

* - - - -- -

IC ------------- - ------

4.- . 0 4

* * - *.oo N a05 0o 0N000 000 E o. . 0_ _ ..---

* 9 .. . . . ...... .. . .

-. -- -- -. _ .- ----: - ------

0

--. 31 9o .9% .9-! .9 .--.-.9

c 0

;.Ow* 0 4DO - 0

:~ V :,=ONO--..,. ,,--

* *• - -..

,* *..*.*oo- "

©* 0= .* ,.'-..-'..4

. ..1 - .-. 4..

* . .S: ~ 0 0 . , ..4 0 6...... -co-.-.* * - .. ,... .-.0..,00 0 0

*- .-*

.* 0 Z.S..

171 -- -"

* - 0. - . - . •

- " * .

*•. . O . - , - - • - . , . . . • . . . .- . . .- . . .0.. . . . ._% ; % ',_% _' _. '. _% -_ -' °.-% .- -. _% .. . " _• *.. ' , -- _ *_s - . . ' _' N.4N % % - . -J ' l . _ .* . .' .. .* '*N * ' . '

Page 181: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

9 ....... . -.' .

- -' - -. - - - --- - - - - -- - - -- -.

9 9!

z 4j

. . .

...... "- .. .- - --

9 9 = .. . .. . . .....

: 4, - :.::..:..:C172

"A * 0 o_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o00 0 -_ 0 . . .'*, * - 4- : :.::000 00 00

* =,, a ....

"* - 4 . ...- 4 ~ . . . :, """ :• .: 4 4 -' - I

: * U : ....-'C' 44 % .. 'O.,

4 -*..............................

,%- 4-.-C N- .

0. u o

.-, • ,

- -

• ,o .-

4'.- .. ." ".

Page 182: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* .

I .

- .

". -' ---

* . ...* 00000 00000•00C"000*- * - •

- • 4

::: "-~ ~ -"° ° ° °° -*i:

* * -°° °*° = ° :- ""

,'* - - .. .- .- 0, .. i0 0

* * -w o , ,,4 oo o '.oo

* *o caoo 4. '""

* h-u°. -* . U 00O .0-•'.-,',-.ii, 0

*< a . o-oo oo.0a-ooooo ooo *"* - . . . . .. . ." " "

* = * *- m

o o • .• 4" . ..C.. *

0.. . *0, 0 0,0.- 0

4 173 "4-'-*

. • ".'•* .. "

• . .- .- -. - -. --; .i .'- - .' 2- :- i . . .. .- -- --, " . .- - * i- .--- * oi. . .. -.o- .-c ,,- .-o.- o o- . . - i.. o o . * . 2 ,-' i .-; - -- '. _' t - - ,. t . t - : -. - . . . - , -2 _ , - -- _ . -' ,' ," ." " ' Z . . . _ ; . -' ' € . . , " " C " - - --C- .0.-

Page 183: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* .. ,

*" .0 0 . . 0 .

,, . - .4.

*-. . .4, .- .

-*

" * =- . ., d #d d g d, d .4'"'"

* z 4 0000.. .. .. . .4000 .* .4: : . .

* .4 .4 . .

,....4.-..

* .4..•

* ,. . ,... -4* - .4 0 -. @,OOOO 0 0000..

17m 4 --7. "-a

* w .• . -

' " °" " "* * " " "'- ' """- " "" "" "'-" ' ' -" " " "" " - " -"- 'n "- - *' - U" 0N0-N''-;'' M'.'-- 40C-' '-' .. C-- - 4- % C - *--- ----- m ' ----- -

_'._-.,. ,.,.' . -0. - 4-,4... .., ,_0 - -, , i .... ..

Page 184: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

q .~~~ .

4-.?... .

*- . 4 o

.. , - . 0t. . .

* 4 .. . . . . . . . . .

.. * 00 0 p0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 ."..'.. C.4

* _ -.- .-; _; " ...; _-.- -- - .-: . _.: ...;> .- --.. .-'. ._ .--.-_ .'., -. i ..' ,--, .:,- ; -. -. , . , -.-.: .* ., -. -> -.*'

Page 185: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

y

p.

-.-.~ w V~ -

.. .~.* .5

.7- -

'. S.'

-~ *.l.

S . ~ 9.I* S S* * 5 0 CC C*

* S -- C CU, - ** S S S5 4 - - S* . SW S* . C S* * - 0CCC.~0CCC0CCCM.C...C00 S'.7 5 . C CCCOC0COOOCCCCOC*CCCC *

* S . SS S CCOoeoeoCooooe..,a..~eo .* S N *

* S 5 .1-* . S* S* .

* .* 4

C0M.U,~S.. 0 ~ S* ~ 0 C.CNCO

* S 5 .* - S C0NC~C00 C 000000 ** ~ S -- ** 0 * CO S* S S 55 5* 5 5 SW S* W S - S* S U CNStMP.C~.00C0mnN.n.4.o 4* ~ S *~ ~ 4* U~ * CCC4CO0..CC0CCCNNt~-o0C .- S . 4* - 4 N S* 4 5* a * ** W S* * S

~ = . .* CU S S

- S 4w. . S5 2W * S

0~ 4 5* W C S- S ~t Z~'Z 4 0 00000O0-.ON0~00.i0ooi-,~ -.4.35 4 5 0 5*5 5 5 0 0 C 0 0 00 5* IflUW *~'

5. 5 05 0 0 0 C 0 00 5

.5 W4' Cud 4* 0 4 - 4* U'2 S 5 OOOOOCOOOOOOCCOOoc.-.0 S* -CZ S . S* u-i-- S OOCOOOOOOOOOOOCoooOO S

* 0z S SwS * S* )-.- S S

S S S.05 4 * S(CS EZ Sj.~. 20 5

K.p

176K

Page 186: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. -.. .- 7. .;--.- . . . .'jC.CMr.- I - - - . .- -.. - 4-

4. 5* * 4* "

* * '"00' w s "" i*,45 , O,,- -*

* - - S S

* 4 000OL0 0 0*'5

*l * e *• •• * - "

* * C 0 00N0..0 000000 *¢: O

* S . 4 .*..i = 5 000 00"000 00 "S: ::::

.. * . .*:o , .. - . .. .*. : - .- _Soo .. o o ,'I

*-: , 4 4 ;;;: ; €;; .---.*- 4 5 -"-, .*. 5= 4 [-

*- 5 -*.,, * 0g '0 C0 N .. ..- .'.*-

* S . . . . . . .. . S""o * m , * -,- -oo o :'-'...-

* ... S S oo ; :;;

.- *- -o S .4 -

.. a S - -. "

c. .,w : .

- S P:i !!i

cn. *

Page 187: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

A I. *iiii -°* * . .... .. ~ • Io o'0

* " . ..... 0 9 . ..9

at° ° °° ° -:: -,- --

* e

Sr a, -"

- ox ooooe oo o o o e o "

r a

-------------------

-o-S.

-. .

1 7

* Z-'"

* ''. ' ¢ '

* -- 4" : ....-.-r

* -°*

18 I _ _!

K ':';"4 "W

4 0 * , , . .- . , o o, o. o&.- . - • . - , - . - . - , , - .,- • . 0 0 00. 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 • *

Page 188: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

i ~,* ~m.. % .o

.-:.. ?.. ,

S 4

-r. - ---- - - - ---- -

*,* * w 0 000 0 0 000

of - - - -

cco

* 0

00 cc cc0N~V 0.00 O 0

..- ------ --- --- ----

* 0 % 9 900 900 900909

CL: ..

to m 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 e e

- -- -

".-

• , ,.*

179

* -.- *.

• .w -* -. °

*79 " ...... "0~ N .. 0* .* % ..0q .°°00 f. . N C

Page 189: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

L . ... ,

4.7 14

[-.--

.,

...-....

-. --------- - -~o- -. --. o ,-.-. --.o -- -

...... ......... . . ..... oo . o .-- - - --

cv! 00- c

i .- * • 4 r* 44 0 d 4CO

" . - _ . - - - - - - - 0- ---

C 4, £!4 C

cc cc au c~C cocOcC;C;, e O J4 4 4; 0 0 a 0 0 c 4 0a

4J at -~ - - - -u -O0 0.

Sr. . . . . . . . . .

- - - - -- - - - - - - -4 -

* . . . .. . . 4 o *.* 4 4 o o 4 4 oor, - ..-

U. :. Co ...

* **::;,"''

3c w

4* . . . .

--. - .-

i f . cce ~ e cc e~ ec i eec ~ ..

C! 9 94 9%9

* ** * a ~ *4 ~ e e!Ll*~~~~~- cr N ~ c c4 e e c. e,'c pc g e c e ce

* .- rUS4 - 4 * vs

* ~ * e eeo cce eee .Ue cee * ~ 4 eee ec180

Page 190: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-- - - - - - -

We. **

coocc~coo..o

i~lc! .. .% I.

12 Il, c! a

- - -S - - -- - - * --

4J c =goO0a oo a c u 0e0.Lu . .. . . . .0000000.a 0 * ~ 0 0 0 0

- - - -

accooaccoca

* a ac

o so - -a

cao occa o

*~~ -34 z cc o. 71 a 0 0

* 0 a g@ o eoco 00 0 a181

Page 191: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

7-7- T I. -.

-. 4-

4;0 c- cc*a 0 0 0 0 0 O 0

* ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 .0 SD* 0 .. * 2 **

dc - -~ * -- - - 000 0IK 0 0 . 0 0 A- m.

a 0 N 00 0 0 - 2, Coco 0 02~ 0N0

u u 0 0 0 0 r Coc

* 0 0 0r 0~ :P- 0 0O. . 4 0 0mC

*0 C ;0 0 0; 0 0;4 o

0 0.0

l* 009 0 0 0

4. 0 06 0 0

* U03 U. 1 .. 4 ** U * .c 4 000000 0 o * 2- 0 'A 0 0 0 0 0

0 IL * i .9D 1! 9O 9 9 *, -z 00Coc *L 1- 4; C; o9 0w0

* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 'A*00~ . M .

c 3 03 0

ma44 4 3rN 0

10 E0 0 1 0

- . ~ M S P - 0 -L a a44 *

*~~ '4--00 00

z C!** 0 *0 000 00 W CocoC 0 000 0

*1 01 0. 01 .0 0*0

a 0 * * *

* 0 E182

Page 192: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.10 0 z 0

w 0 CL -A

*0 3% - - -- -

0-1 0 A0-

o 0 C!z v C!-u 00* .- ~ 00000000

1 - 0

* 000000 0

00 0lu=o . 0 v

or co * 00

* * :183

Page 193: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- -- - - - - -

*- - - - - - - - - - -

4c * 2 9 C 0

0 C 'A 00 0 m. Oeecoecocce *0

* ~ 0 0 00 9O C CO 0 0 046 u 9 9bW C cc c

0 9 A a0 9; 9; C ;04;4'

41 cc99

- - - -- - - - - 9

*c cc C 0 0V000000N - 0

*:: 02 0 0 U 9

* u * La cc L

* 0 9 W 00 9 0 9 a 00400 0 .40 9oo

* 4. 9 * ** * b * lU* 0 9 fi 98 0 00 0 0 0

C I i-

* * 184

Page 194: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-o

44

.6 * 00 0 0 cJ0.1 1 .N -- 4 ul cc N

11 41

* * 0 4w

x 4 4

o o o* 4 4 4

* 4 4

C 0 le z .

Lm ~ ON *4 * ~ 4

* * *mmIL* 2 * 2 *

185L3 4CL

Page 195: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - - - - - -

. . . .. . .

• •*• • • • * • • • • • •- - - --oo - -oo -oo oooooo oo

S. * 00000000000000

0 , 00 0 * --

-o* o* o s

'a Inaa

* *z *5 .l oo o a~ * •,••,"-

li 0 C3Wo a * Z a)

... . I -- -------- a a % a - * - co O O

: - -- - - - - - a

* - 0 040 ZZ a c 00 0 0 0 0.92 *~6 0 0

K ~ it w * ~

n 0 - -S 0 0 -- - - -

- - - - - - - - -0 :0

0% 0 CL a k

Q~ : _ 0 0 c

0. 0. OZ ** 10. C --

.3. ..- **

186

i. o. r . .. .M . C "• " '.*" °% " . . ~% ' • 0"' 0 " " . " . "° . " '*"° " "" 1In2, " .. =0o * (AZ 4" ", .0 00 0.°0 •

Page 196: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

G• **. . . .

*- -.-.... .-.... ... .- -

* * - -- 0-00--00------ -

* 9 o ooo oo o oo o ~ o

I "c* 9: .. .oo ... .o .o . . . ..

"* ° . t9* , * 0,,= o0oo0ooooooo 0oooooo 0oooo

o 9 - -No

-87 4

* *_ 9 .- :

* : . . *° , * • * • • • ° . .* • ° • *-.-.

-* o.* * -:'*

" 9 *,,..%

* * -00 - N4.~ ~ .1"

* 87 - 00 0ON C .

• -:: . -, - '..' .:, -,_,':. _ ':.' , .: ,_ :_ -' _ _ ' "' ' • 6- " " " ' " " ' " " " - " ' " " ' "" ' '

Page 197: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

AD-A65 31 IMORT NEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPERKE DRY RAM 3/3- PROPOSED NORFOLK D.. (U) OLD DOMINION UNIV NORFOLK YR

APPLIED MARINE RESERRCH LAB A J BUTT ET AL. MAR 05UNCLASSIFIED DC NSS-8 -B-0 i C65 F/O 8/NL

mhhhhEEEshmhhE

Page 198: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

_______"2,_ 8 L2

- --

1.0 L4.012.

1.6

MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART

*p.e

Page 199: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.dr.

* . *••****C. : .4i .tl

* S

* Sco0 044j 0

oo , °°° °°°~g o ° 'oo oo...

- - - - - - - - - - -- - - -

a - 0000w 0 0 0 0

- - - -

-

* 0 O 0 N 0 000% " %0.*

* * - - - - - - - - --.-- ,. -

on0 . ..; .°° oo"' o° ° ° ° . .

* -

* .S .*

cu z

*. ** S*

- - - -

- - - - - - - - -

0 - S . 0 000 0 0

* -. S *s ... . S

5 0 * 5 00 0 0 00

*~ 62S~'U S U *

188 m f.~0 0 00 0 0~ 00 0.

Page 200: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

rj J -0.- V. I V 0 i 0MNW I 0 .i . -. * [ ,~

, NA.

4; ; ..... .

o*; .%* I. "

- .* * 4 " . . .a4

Ier coo c c, * * 4 • c

:.~ .= ,.= .. ...- .-..

-e-- e--------.. % d..

Coc

.eNO.OO OeO .*9.

A "A. .

031 4 cocoa

I: c : ..

,. o..

: =. :

.* **%@00

4 - ---------------- 4

* - . 4 000000 00-00.e*0000* .4 4%.

189 . . .

.. -'L,." J'',' .' .. , 'J,,% ,.', _, ,, ' . . .., ' ' .,',_.''' , "... _ .. .......' * ., . - ..* U 4 - -. _.' .4.',_

Page 201: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

%

• ~ ~~~~~ -- -" -;o o -" ----- ';'€• : ~ ... ... .. .. . ..

• A

as......._ . .

0* •

ea 4e6 'c e aeIc ~

,o°' •* ° -

*..e * ., oo .. c e o e a oo o * .-•..

- - - - -- -.

* *. :~ eeooocooo oeaooa@.

- ..-. : . . . -*-

- -~ - - - S

= * .- W° 4 :

o * *,- * 8. .'.-.'.-.

: . : 4.:.:

* -CZ * • ,°•*•* ,* *

'j c! c! ci c T

* C • * -.

,.',,

* a * N z I

190 .

," '.: r .,r',* r... .. , , , .. . ,.•.,. ....... ,...... ........ .. ,... .. ......... ...... ... ......... .. .. .. . .

Page 202: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

N.. .'-4M

~.~ ~ oQRl o oo ..

* ' """" *

--- -- -- --- -- --

.* - *- .

* 4 *.'.--

0 N 0 - 4

- - - -- -- - -

*6 .. ... . .09 . .. . .. . . ..*-- --- .----

w 0 Coo 0

* *= q * -,-,..-

a* -ic .9 *9i i .. ..... .

0 *U

* 0 ................. ... .

0 C, 00000E'iN000900000000

* 4 4*

* . 4,. . . . .o. . . . ..,. . .

. 1 1 "- -

"- -.'-. -- .-0- - - - -'- ,'

In 0----- - - -: - - - -

: 0 0 ; . 04

0 c -I* 00000000--n0000000000

-1 - '

191

Page 203: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

rwnuu--w wrw"UVWUUUP IL N'Klr WbL1%W'

I- -- -- --- - --

*. . . . . .r .. ... . . .

- - -- ---- C

00 00 0000

*, r *o .am "0'€

* t *

* S * o .

4JI I 00go,

U0 * ---------

in 2.. , *"

-~~~~~~~ ~ -. --.. --

*~ M

"+ .

a: C!9 .'C9 % T % ....,. .,

0.40

192O9 *~* .0 *"Um

0 * ,l .*. -

4 ., "(') S- ..-'

* p..4%** " A-

-. . .* e* ... 0.O OO..O%'OOC O.,

,, , ' • - - < .. . . . .. .... - ,' ." . , . ," . 5 . . -. ." •. . . .• -OC O O; :_CO O. _ PO+ ..

Page 204: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- - -

..ooo oo.oo .o ...oooo-. -- -o --. = ------

* a

* , a •0D*

• 4o k* -

-- -- .- -- : - ---- --- :-- -

96 4~~

,.0* , - .

*_:. : .: . ... .

. • -. . I . ",...,

-~ -

. . . ...a.eoe.e.o.-.o.e . .

* 4 ** e°oeCC°°-eO°O° °O@ o~eee ° a .. '.

.. 2 . .* -

.*-a,.-- -4•- a ".*. ,. .

* = a ".."...

* '.. 9 -

* n.? ..-m.,

* 4 C 000 00O-000(~000.000* ~ a u. 00000.00-.000-..,,00 ,

* a iJl* 93 a" ""00 00 0"000"0 0

* = -"4ii• .. ...... ...; .. .. .. . .... .?. . ..-.. ... ,?.-.. ./ .. -. ..: .... ... .. ,- ..... ? .? . .. . :.,:.*. . , - . . .ia 4i i .

Page 205: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

o cec c i*0 C; C; C

RiO @0 *- * C, -. 0 00 4a 0 a00a 0

*. A " * 000000000000

G * uaS u Sl

99 0

z 0, 0 Z 0 5": 0 5

:9 . - # *------4-* as U. 9 2U .

W.1w 2 "oo... . .

0 5 5LS CocoO~S--3 cooeooooo 0 * S

t z * on Ioo oo ooGAoo200 * ~ 0 00 0 0 cc= o ee o e o oe e o

~~0 .c.S . . .~us . .

*q 0000000000.4 -~ 0 .%C - oa.. co *oS Zccocc

-*~1 Za Z S a.~IL aa C2a

*co 00 1

19

Page 206: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

- S

* .*F . -' .

& *0- - -- - - -

@ o 0o 0 - @ 0 .. . . 0

,ooo o : : Iwo, "40 04:4D* S b * 50a000m 0 0 00i

•:. .w

. : : :z !* ww - - - - - - - - - - -

• • • •* *• •* 0 q-w 0OO 00 ,.I 0

di . 0 . e . e . . . ... * . w * . * * . . . .

= : =* * :

6. - - - - - - - a - - 0. 0

-o, -

* 0 0 06 00 0 00 a 0 C 0 0 0 0 00 a,000000 a Z i= ...................... '

00000.0. a 00000 0 *. ,

Z 3,. -. ,... -,- aa

..: ' . . . ... .. . . . . .o .•- -~ - - -m - -

: F : :. 0 60 . . . I..,.0.

1P,

S5------------------

m ' ,,. -, -..-,* *.....................-....,.-....'a':'':'a

Page 207: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

% C!

zccc coo 0 CO0CC

C! . 0 - s 1a1

0000C0000 * * - 00000000

* ~ * 05 a

02 0 z COC

-9!%Tc z 20 z 0 a %

* * oooocc 00000000

0 Is :-z. 1.50 00 0 0

0 0 *. 0 C .a* 2 ' 0 19@a -o f Cam C - a

~196

Page 208: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

C~~~~~~~~ 77 -4 rr r . .' ....W ~ .~ 7 .~' . C.'b . ' ''l V ~ '' T 1

- ~ ~ ~ ~ J -- -----

cc- 0 N 0 W%

S. 909 CCON 0 * - .

9~c 000 C *- 000 0C 0

*4 4; J 0 00 0 a0 a 0

0 0

4j 0 L0 av 0 . 0

0 0 0 3-z c 0 ,0 0 o* z 0 0 0 il%!..i %0..

c* 0 06 0 cc0 0 0 0 0 0

0 00 -1 - N 0

0 -% w W, 00

-- -- - ----~

mu0 6 OOccOO 0 4coC m 0 00aos

cc c 0 0 04; ic f0 J;C

;J C; 0 C J J

* a 0 0 U 0 *=

* ~ ~~~ mu **0

* a * 0 *~4J197

Page 209: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

.7 -. . . . .

0 S5

* 40% . ...

* 4) W 4OO O

.. o 4,

o 0

P44 --

.o . .. ..

CL . . .'- "... .|

C . *

. "

,- - - -- -

N M in000f 40 P004 r

x * - "

*. .4 4 . . .-..

N , I, o :P 0 ,1

4 . 4, . .4

4 .. : S...-

* 4 4 - . •

* A 'A • c - 4y

4o 4 4.

en 4 c ...*-," * 0000 . a0 .C; -:

P 4 e r"e D 'r i N N %4M 4 -r U" .'--4"

4y 04 44 eyr - . f

.4..., ....w.... 4 .* * * , * .'. ........ .... . . .. . ..., .. .. . . . .. . .. ..-......... , -... :. .4.:.-.'.:.:

6% M 4P *04 w0- ,A W " -e 1c0 N00z0aI N 4

-* - - -

co m 4'a 0 4

4g1 m W QQu -4 & *ZAm D-

*P m 4 4 0 a 4 N .4 4en 0 m N41 z N .4N0N

4 4 m........................................................

Page 210: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

*.,

N a t- ..4W lv. i -to9

, d: C!cK 40 0-O~ 4P4?fl 0000 0 0

1; 4 4.p *

Itm

at

4 4 48. ° b

* * 4

w* . . ..- ,-.'" ,.

4.

A]= : 0- 0 -o-0 o .

0 0

: LL "" L

M 4 4! In .0 o w w -4 . 0. o w m o r

w* 4r ftmNml *r4 "Q0 w wc,6 j k

mm. - wr w .r m -- .--. ;.

W 4 m M.'0--'---

co 4

In -a .0r n f* 4a0 :0w noAI le

* - ,- 4, ,

w In N. w% Invo4

39 Q of ~ ~ Ii 4 3.. .f00 N

%' .,-'. " 'o." '%°.. * 4°• , - -% - . , . .• o * * * * * o- . . . . . . . • . . . . . ., , . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.o,

-- -. " . , - - ' _ '. - 'm" 0 " 06 0 -

ca -1 : h. .

fv w0 , w a 4 - - * m

o 4c*pl (n 000 000mmon a, w %O 'v r"0 0q 00N0Z 0Nm-4 0000N

* 0 199

Page 211: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* 447

*% %

.4.f

-- -- - -- -- - -- - -- -- - -- -- - -- -* ~~~ W% a-.*J

0 - - -*.-at fQ 4"a

0, 31.

cs 4

-- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -

* 4U * -4

* v 4P3L CI

-M

LM4 0 -4.to6 vF ya n %( "g .f i 0 0.00.43 Cc W'0.N Cc4 c.

m4 :t - - - -

0 4 *D

* PM 0 N 444W 4W- * 4 4 '

*y 0 4. 44 - FAin

ma - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -M 4r 4 a-N4am. N4i r

c*: m 4- 4;C N ra

4u w w

01 00 10 0U 0 0 j .

*0. cr lp4 -N W V o_wIt Z" ON-4l 4 N

4-41 . O 00

0 00 00 MO OOO OO OO 00

000

0002000

*~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~: :p04 h 0000000000000000000000

Page 212: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-- - - - --

at •

* . . . . . . .

* k

G 0

* r . * -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• . * ,- =,•

* 4 4O 'O OO0 O O ¢) •OO •w "

* 'o - * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4:. "''

*p • .- * • - ."

* ,4 o4-

.. .... .. . .. .. ....

*.4 4 4* ,' D ,==4 ,I ~ ,4. P ,

%A 49 z 0N a 4 M I~o- .t-

,'* 4 . -4* * e * .-*,"i . * a *, a. .

S" ~ . ..0.4..':.-aO e 0 OMO

Co 04

• o e~ r OM.O. MNO OO OO OOOO~O .OO O .____

. a. 4

c 1. 4 0

W 4 ;. z z-.z ;

IL C * 6 4

14 .1 r: ggggg.~gg 4F

0~ 4 Q

- - ... - . .. .. . j . .go. . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . ., . .-. . . . . .

-" .. - -. ft_ .

a, ty 0.4 0.W04- . 0 P0o-mm0d r40a DW

Ofa,~ :M OP N ".r 0 mol

41 -- - -A-4 z z 9 4Z7: o1 *

4" 4 W% *0 .y f. r M . .Z .0 'a 0* 0. ". 4 .0 W%

0 00 10 60 N N 40 N 00- 10*

c 1, C -% 'I* *- 4- 40C20Z0- 6;A-1 W 4 a- 44N04 0( . c 04pj4 "C P4 Yf 0-

0 -N -4 f"444- 4 4- 40 -1 - 4

*- 4 e,

* M 4 S* a * *a a* a * * * ** a* 201*

Page 213: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .- 'l 't -P -.l

- - - -; - .- -- j; l- l.i -, i ; -r ;

.9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .9J .~ .,~ ~ F W19~.9.~~ 7 9. q~U~9- r . . I. . ~. .7 . . . . . W .. ~ ~ L

0 -*0

Ci ,0 In 0 4 p N 4N, ". ,. O0 00000 - f.. 0 0 ,CP.S at

00 00* C4 COO0 ' 0 0 0 , z - *OOC i%,,9;,

LUz . . . ..- ... :..

U,- - - - - - - - -

"-

* bOO1Lm O

'A z -

•~I P. 0

ii Cc

o. .; Q. .; .Tr yf (n k 0 oZc

3 c ,

F N N m40m.0.Ndsiw 0) m C r 0

M - r- -~OC ~ d N 4 0 4 C - 0 OOO .4NC O N0- OO

.:. 14 1; a; 4 '4' :

Z Cok oonS *8 0N *0 M-0 0 *o *.c *o Cal949 9 *9**

-w" ,,,,,,

4 C *

~~~202 -. "

, 4_%* ~ OO O O O O O OO O O O O O QO C O O O

Page 214: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

t* 0

_, * - -

,, *.4i* * 4

..... .. .e. . . . . . . .". . . . .. . . . . .... .

* 4 , 4rI I OOOOOO 40 0

* * * 1 m . - OOOOOOO O O

€11 OM

• * • * "= L

kA Z •

4 * 4-G';

-. - - -.

x C1 4 4r V.J WN r o 00 y1 rcI* c 0

le 3- .0 4 N. 0 P.0P *N. wr r0P ) wN

m r* %r e 4 P.*

I* 0

CO C 40 -om m44O P o nn w wo

40 o WA W Ac 4: .t M = .1 A NNE*~- c -N4. .~E O CA (A 0 MN.0

* 0 4 a-

'": ~~203 "::: -

- , .- . .' ...., .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . .. . . .. •z .. . . . .. . . - .- ... ". , . . .

Page 215: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-4- ----

C!o 9: , o ooo oi oo .. . .: o o ... .

ou 4% .4# *f 4

00 00* ,4.00 0 0 004 .* O 0 0

fy 4y. -

* j 4

.4 I-.

. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4.. .

P - ..

4A 0 cooN~O

4-).

X00

ma " M .C N 0 00 LM0 (Ac MC

4 *0 I4 pi4 4F 400 r

D 0 W, 4

.4 9-i 4 4 0 m mU - n4 CP 4wr r wr

too I 9ItW ii1 . i

• 41,in Q m N 4 m 0 Nw40 • 4' 4

1-.

4 ;' N nN -44mN9nF 4e w "Npya0 .0 4yA oNaC4y y 4y 1- N

o* - 4 44 - 4

X4 j x..

a -4 M. '0 *44MN.40 4aaN m N 14 .4N 4 N*

4 4 N -04

Page 216: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

*0 00

404

ut 0

oc 0

z to

0 Cie

0- 'A*L s 0

&A z

0 DJ &A

*o 0

CO * 0

0 LCOU@C O MQ

X C13.. C C

x *.n7% :i1 :1 10. 0 hi QN N ' ?. 0.to 03C nf 0f 0 - W - rf0f 0 0

L* W f0 -o- r N 0 4-

*~ * 0 C .4Q'O ejN e

a( 3. N

0 0 0 0.4 r ~0 2o fi09 w OyaF 0

N in 04 0

%n N W4f r 'M04 0 0

0U 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 04j La U 01U qI AZ w00

* A1 LL IC00 1C4r. , C.4 Af AN4Z

0 01 - 0 1

0 0 *205

Page 217: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

* *

.M - .a,.

C ,, . - .- -: -- : --- -- -- ---.

* t 4

- - - -- -,* * a f

z • o o 0 o°,,o o o o oo o o oo o o

_,. 4•

-O z

*1 4 4 *l, / O4",d .

* * .,-.

. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . * "": ::"

4 7 -

i. . 4 *.F-m .

-: 4 4 * .. . -

-0 ry 4p N r fn

.',.' ;' . , ....-.- . .- .-. -4 ., . .- . ,. ... ** * * . . . . -. ... . -,.. -... . . . . ,.*,. 4. ' . . . • . . ..

4 4 w -m0 d 4 cc0 n n0 * rulr-4 .4 -0 aN 4r.

* 0 *

*y 0 44 4

0 IL 343 3wu4a

r4 0P 4 a*4 r4fM ry 4 44. y NNN ~ 4. 4 fo y

* ~ 406

* U 9 4

Page 218: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

0 a* 0

-- -0 9A *

. ... .oooo o oo ooo. o ..-....

r- Ci ,

Coo- .

0 LU

x "2 * - . . o

• ~ ~~~~~ (P1" 0 fq, -

%" *- :

* . 9 *i

* * ,9.~ o -*,. -.-...

207 ,: "" -

(Y~~ 6N .4 t% cr, fm p

*k - - - - - - - -

* *7* * N

W0 0a, in 5

*p %i %

0 . *o do a * a a 10 Q *9 I

** - S

4p 0 110 .9

~~A A4. 0 00.

9y. mf ,- 4-0 0

20

Page 219: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

,,:..-...-.

- - - - - - -- -. a' 1-0 0 -a d-Y Z 0 'A%0

* *'•-4N 0-¢.4 N, 190

*4 n el) *99 ea o 45mm a no m 0

41 - -

*, 4 in -W 0 •* * :-0 O 4 a a ~ O O N 0 ~ O 0 N N 0 0 0 9 999999 -.9':..'...... .

ac fa -C Woeooo oeeoeoeooooAooo ooeeooe oc0.-e

99..

rx ~ ~~~~ 4i9 D4 V

* i------------- - - -.9 9 9 9 9 9 9 . 9 9 . 9 9 -*~~1. m 40 m .04 *. ~~~rm mN 4 00. ~ 0. Nc 0 ,- *

-. . .. ..- ' .

*. C, * Uoo : . .* - '. 4 .4j,* N 0 M 4 .l99• e' 4 5.

* = * *

*4 =

I.-

• I

.0- 0 .4 C%-,0" -..

L 0 4)= 1; C;. %''- 4;1 %" ; ." 4 f, 4. 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 . 9 9 9

WW a = 0, 0 *0 ..... O. .O-.0-,.cc4 0- CA

4 4 4 LOI Z4 4F 64 o- JP-a n1 %P rW I

• .o d 4"o!O

Uj 4y

%-r40 04- 070'64 r

el- o&M0 4m 'D g r' N 0 'a'

p 4 4

~ .4

.9 .0 .". .. . .'.

r. " * '

40~~ -j -aA .. 4 ; .r 4' %

4p 999 44 0j i a

*4 N 4 - fy.4 0

~ 209

Page 220: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

S- -.. .. - - - - - - - - .00000000* 25

vii* :

" z

0 ,- M .. .,.. .... ..

OL 0 DI .

- -- * - - --. .- -

0 01 %Ai0 ,,

AL Cm 0. m m f- CP ' 44

* * ,, * .,'. '..,

a :

* * 0 a I 'P-0

-*., o* .a*.-.*- *' "?

-9 . . . . ... * *%

* 0 * .a .

* ~ ~ ~ ~ - ol 0 00 0 0 0* £ * ~~~ 000 0 0 00.

0 Li 4 a

.4 -4.

* 208

Page 221: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

W' 4

r~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I: e:Ie!Ie!II'-1.-'e-'1nI :I nre

- - -. - -

*P f- 4 M tN A 0 4r4 .v a- 0. -0IIN0*~~~~~ 4r m N 00 m~ 0O' 0 N-% .r N

C, . .0.0. -1 0

II

,4e"

*.. ..o .*. .o. . . . . . . ._

4i

*4NN4M-N-N- -0- -- - ~ N 4 NU N N -

r ,

N A 0

LL4

4t • • . . .

• - ," . -

IL =

......4:4

ac .o

* GN4 0 - - --

% w N aw N 0 N :NzO.-O 1P - C 4 0. w 0 m -4AN w ~ .

t- 4 o T 4- ..... 0 -4 0 rO La. ", .. .. . ... .. . .. . . . . . .. '

4;~ ~ Cd~ ri 0'r J O4;:- - - - - - ----

. ... ... .. . . . ..... . . .

Z 9

*0

"*2 0 -- . "

CL• C:.,

P- * :.-.-..;

- o ". 1,* e % "-- . - "4, " .l ." . . . * . * * . .' . * % % .' '. . % %, .% ,. , . . ' .. . . .

NO 4Q co 0 0 O 0 0

NY N N N N*4I YO YN Jl Nl n"

"a w~C 4 ' 1IC zIIj

4i "1 -1 : : 4 "%.; , u*. ca A CJ4-

ftA f" 4 .4 .- 4- Me~' 4yA -4 4

P.' 21

Page 222: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

II

*0 *of 140 O O M P0 4 40 in IV i ?

.of

M 0

cc

00 * 0Ib .* 4£.N 40- 044.M- C -

f" *u.4U-x

ZZ:jNO .I -N C) 0 CF-I 4 CI v2 C ;C ;Z8; ;*cZ ~ o

CL 0 * L-W r 4 .'0

or 4

* 4M 4

u 4OM44-r,.0jN 4M4-4.4-

:3 to -W 0 M..7b, 0M 441 ,1 - %mm-

do -d

ry0o0ow N. yf e yocZa Ia y ~ % r -

4 - 4 ~j . 4****e** . .. . . . . . . .4. . . 4*** . . . .

*0 0 .; .b. J-

ww U 44 46 4A A Q 0 ojA a

.1 4.) v Q a a -*r- ' r - r m a 70244- 4N1 4 -

* ~ 4 *211

Page 223: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

~~J.

. . . . . . . . . . 2

ft- M- 15 n-

-4 0 .w 0 a040F

P: C:- ' .oft (;I;.,,,o o ,. . Z , O: W. ... t_

*. 4 - * .

0 0 N "C( MI

'r uj

•L I.L •

• 0 ; 0. N ; ; ;

of 0 4 n . ..4.

-a -j 3 *

4, - c 74 -C4 * %0T 40N0N0

* l 4p4* 0 * CL

z 4 4

. . . .. ... *i U."~C

- - --m 4

- :~~4 4 : 4 .- '- .'.

. .Z . . .. . .

- 0 ,: C: ; 8 -" o . .* 8 8 .8 ; *8C - O 0 0*.,0 0 0 O C - .

4l FM 4A-,- J--4, N - -4 4 N4w N -1 4 Z.) 2

*~1 Na * - .

Page 224: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

40 44 4 4 ' ' '

*J * 4... .. ,.

* 4,. , o. .~ o. ,00. ..7.,... :" , +_*4........ ....... ................ .4 4 o ". .. 4.""- -- - -

* 4,* * 0

.4 * * ,,,,

.- " ,I n I I..:'.I-'e: e e I I r: c Ir

cc 4 0 0 *

at 4 m4** 444*

c co c 00000000000000000000000 00 0000000 4

*I * 44•

LU 0

.- LL q- - ---- -- -- ..

*% 1 4. 4

* 4 . 0 0 3 0 . . O-+I 4) :::::.

41 C *1 : C . . . . . . . . . . .

U , 0 I'

CK 4 4

oil.

C3 4Oy r 4N W4C wm o- 94 ~ --

4 w -4-

* % 4 6 %A U04O I" 4 l*O '0

* m w a 0 0 0 0 wm i 0 0 , 0-.- .-.-

*- -44 4 44 4 4

*O 1 ! 01 00 00 0. Z0 ~ 00 w .4j3= = j =1 z4 U- U 9C - .

4 4 4(P "

* .4 4 .4444444444444.4 214 .

-* - 4 44 4 44 0 4 4{"i* : 7 4:

4 4J

" L4

*." 213* *4 .4 4-

, . ,,,., _.. . ,* . , . • . 4 . . . . . .. . ..

r . ._. .. _.... 4.".. .0....•....* ".. . """"... ..... . .. ... "• "' .. 4" '.i....""-...

Page 225: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

-4 . • . 4. : .iU...VV W W - .',,

o * p " *• •

e, ho , ,,

.. .,,,...,,,, . .. ., ... ,, .*- 0 Mt

N 00 0 0 % N ON 4l . .a '

at m cc 490 49 49 4 0 4:Afc

* 4 C

* * 0 00000t0N€ 0000000t.000-0,d4 00C00000 4 •

,. * .0: ..... .

". 9 * 1 9 -C! -" "4* * oo e o oooooooo,-eoeoooooo,-eooooo. o *..-',

" * " " , : o o o , c * "-..*''-

•4. 4 4 o ., o o o o , . . , o o . o o o o ~ ~

o*• . -o*

* I[" t 4 N

* : .4 .4 " * i

""

z *j N -*

a 0 . .

A rz a u . _.. . .. . "Ix 1- 0 u 4

w 4

41.-

a ) U * *-I-. 4* * -u 09o000t1...00.0.0O0N.~'

WN Ch 4 i 0.4- NO 44.4 44 44 4

o 0 a m 000 00m0N0m 0a000 y0a0w0N0N 00o 0N00(P 0N

- - - -- - - --

414

IL TC C!C *1 1 C

- *Z

Page 226: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

S%

" 4o

,,,.. . . .. ." . ..,,coo 44;;44 4;~~4((q 4; 4

- -4 - -

0 C 0 O 0* 4j --

* j W 10 m00 0m f N 0

'" • w. 4) 0O OOOO O 00 '- OOO OOOO0O O O0oO*'10000O

• • oO O O O OOO oO OOeeOeOOoo ~Oo e oOeO 4. ''''""

C 4

* h 44j

e 4

" * 0 , % -OO O O ONOO O " o~o,* . ,-oNO

"-" (.J* i~ *. • O 0 0 000 00 M-OOI O MQ O -O O * ,"*'

- 0 4 4N *.

* W cb-

,A C "I "! I- It- ,-.1:1a i1 1 C!

Q 1 4 ww -COONeO O 0 O 4O O 0 0 00 e v N 4

en -- c N

* -

-3 4 -4

0 * C6 A *

A U : P

" ,1* C! 1* 4

4P,

* i- ,,- .

a* *1 U U .. 1 w ( -o -.9 O 4 w w - w*

-N 2P cc .0Aa 0 NO 0r -4.f O rnM 4

• -. , ~215 '--"

r,. ,., ,., ,. .- .. _ 4_ uf. 4_ ,MO"O.*L'," . . . . " " ". " " "; . " . " • "" ." -" • " -" .". . " . * :- * ' . *. * .' " ."""'.*. . . ,

Page 227: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

. .. .

4 m

a i - - - ------. --.---

S4 ", 4,-. * * a ; 0 7, .".

w A - -

. Qw 41 -i: r,, Wr, 4 , 0

t 4 N rN ONN ON . '-"" ""o""at * a a 0 ..4 0 Q * ..

,. ) :

- .

* a i 0

*4 .6 -,*- .a

-4, a. - - -.

-*-.-.. -"

w - - o ; 8 . ;- . . . . . .

. a .

it:

* 9 4 0 • .

oC X

. . .4 P

r P4 w

* a 4 bie

* ~ 4 M .0 Sr. In.0

* 2 4 CV. 1 '4N4

V. 1fl0 0 6 r.* * * . *

4.- doa ODW 4* * v 00 do0 00W--a aJ 0 6UA1 Z.Q

4~~~I X -f 4 Z~~%r a, 4q 4- ID

a~~ N3 a-

-*

" .

a16

' " '" ;" "' "; ' "* NO" * a"- / '" ,2,? " . .'. ...? -.i'- ... .? -.- ' ' . .? ' '" ' , '' . - .

Page 228: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

7 1 • . .

" 4 4

e, e; *e

n m o o e o o n o -ono -o - 4 m .L o a m

; 841 8444 1

0 .4

-- --- -- " - ------ --

* t . - V . P 4

- " , ' .e 0 -0 4 *

n' 4

• *• 00000000.0000000r0-00000 •

.. 4 -,, -4 ---

* 4 0

44" 4* o

c * 4 " "o

* 4 6.,

*:: - --. -,

* - -- * 04** 04 04 0 *0*0"*0"0 0000 0 "0* C6 4N "N

* •. 4,U-4 4' .%.

* X * AM~

co O C I.- A 00m u .a

. ...... . ..... .... -4'- ' - '- '. ; 4'.. 4 ; ' ' .'. ,-_'_

Z nj 4

4 O - 41 4

* ~ 0 4 ,.'t-4 -4 CC 4C 4W

4 -- 4

~~~*. 4". a-6 00 0 040.400-ego.0 U. N4w4%0 4

04 Iw -I 4 *0004 C CO O 0.d O OL)4 ~ A 4 . -~

*~N N v. 2&

LL. 4

CI.~~ m- *

KO -------------------------- 4

400 1.0 a 4 * 44 4 4 * 4.1 *401 *0 3, * *

* 14 4 a- 0 a w 0 j . 0 -4 4 0 4ON O .Q -m 44 NC 4y0 Y . .

* 4~ 0---------------------------------------------

Page 229: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

f%4

* 4 ... ..

- --

4 U -E -4

W% 4" -V

0 4 %4 IA

a, e. .A . * 4 p%**

0 -C a eooe~o uek b 4. *mui

o 4k N9 zQC . e 4

z m 4 al

0).0 0 U 0E

z * 4 4 M C

0 *~I~ Nn 4N O .fjZ0

*0 ;nMr :C f* W 4 4

4 L 0* 0

* U 44

o 0 C C 0 0 a 4

1- 30 1 v.U v4.zj04 .w.~ w 4 49 -Ot A O OO OO u0 4

itle 41I .1. 0.U 00 C 0 0 E A04w a N

~- : OOO CO.00-218

Page 230: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

P wl lp S; F. I F- PL: V- 9 -V". ..

S4

- - - .- , -- -

IV f... a

* a .d .. ~

I" WP* a -

o z . ,.".

. . . . . .* a a alr* P, I Cp • :"

* a 0 O toI 0 a .L

.a a oOzONC

X 0 Im

-c j

- - - - - -• - 4 - - - -

4 C

2. ,

-, - - - - - -

: , : "~:=: L

0~ L*

*- t,6'1

'* wZU . :: ~ 0 0 . .... .0....

-. , ,_ . : :; o: .. .i

-w .= .a = o.. .

.. a a ..# •

" o " a .t - '

• a 0 1 )000.) ON000 ,a, . : - :* a -- 0aa E ,a , .4 a ,. 2 e 0. .

* a* • 0€ a-*,,*0+l0 0 .a IL a -a C a a

a a* -. - o

a : *. . . . --* - .. a'

a a : -------------------

i ... ........... . * *, * 0 0000 00 10 .:a.a .

'J'' . . -+., . *..'...,. " .... "...... ''.'''' .. '._.... "' :. '''...'+'-. . ... " ."""" "a'""- -"." a"". ... ".

Page 231: IIIIIIIIIIIIIu mohhEEEmhhhhhI mhhhmmhhhhml · U ( IMPORTANT MEROPLANKTON OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY AND PROPOSED i NORFOLK DISPOSAL SITE. II: CRUSTACEANS AND ICHTHYOPLANKTON By C/)

L4

"1

'"-'-I,

'%mmmm.'..'u.'

6 •. OP

le %

-o' * -