IDEM 2010 OutlookNIRPC Environmental Management Policy Committee January 7, 2010

Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP CommissionerIN Department of Environmental Management

1

Indiana State Budget Challenges• Indiana’s most recent revenue forecast is

$1.88 Billion below the budgeted amount for the FY 2010-2011 biennium.– State Agencies reduced by 20+%– Higher Education reduced by 6%– K-12 Education reduced by 3%– Budget surplus will need to be spent

2

Response to Reduced State Income• Eliminated 2009 & 2010 raises.• Strategic Hiring Review—Using attrition to

reduce spending.• Reduce/eliminate grants, contracts, etc.• Restrictions on travel and purchasing.• Will maintain essential State services.

3

New IDEM Budget Actions• Returning staffing to January 2005 levels

through attrition.• Moving most of Shadeland staff to IGCN and

renegotiating the lease.• Canceling or renegotiating a number of

service contracts.• Voluntary unpaid leave program.

4

IDEM Staffing Levels

YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Current 2010 Target

Actual FTE 895 918 915 927 954 950 912 900

5

IDEM Grant and Loan Program Suspension

• Grants and Loans from the following non-reverting funds were suspended as of December 19, 2008: (as listed in budget report to legislature)

– 2580 Recycling Promotion Assistance Fund– 2530 Solid Waste Recycling Fund– 2640 Waste Tire Fund

6

IDEM’s Mission

IDEM is responsible for protecting human health and the environment while providing for safe industrial, agricultural, commercial and governmental operations vital to a prosperous economy.

7

How Does IDEM Protect the Environment?

Develop regulations and issue permits to restrict discharges to the environment to safe levels.

Inspect and monitor permitted facilities to ensure compliance with the permits.

Use compliance assistance and/or enforcement when people exceed their permit levels or violate regulations.

Educate people on their environmental responsibilities. 8

9

Performance Metrics Dec 2009Quality of Hoosiers' Environment Result Target Comments

% of Hoosiers in counties meeting air quality standards

100% 100% 80%

% of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage

93.5% 100% 20%91+9 (100) out of 98+9 (107)

% of Hoosiers receiving water from facilities incompliance with safe drinking water standards

98.0% 99% 95%

Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute

Land 19,928 66,565 86,864

Air 45,159 207,000 385,000

Water 20,785 48,000 200,000

* Places emphasis on back logged permits

Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards

Inspections 97.61% 97% 75%

Self reporting 95.80% 99% 95%

Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.83% 99.90% 99%

* Tracks observations and not just inspections

10

Performance Metrics June 2005Quality of Hoosiers' Environment Result Target Comments

% of Hoosiers in counties meeting air quality standards

61% 100% 80%12 counties & 2,408,571 of 6,195,643 above standard

% of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage

4% 100% 20% 75% by 2007 is goal

Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute

Land 100,013 66,565 86,864

Air 511,000 207,000 385,000

Water 301,000 48,000 200,000

* Places emphasis on back logged permits

Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards

Inspections 95.46% 97% 75%

Self reporting 97.11% 99% 95%

Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.19% 99.90% 98.95%

* Tracks observations and not just inspections

Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions.

Dollars spent on outside services per year $6,179,367 $0 $3,447,017

2009 Environmental Laws• SB 202—Transfers the lead based paint program

from IDEM to ISDH.• SB 221—Confined Animal Feeding

– Requires CAFOs to also meet Indiana CFO requirements

– Establishes good character disclosure for new or expanding CFOs

– Notify all people within ½ mile of a new or expanding CFO

11

2009 Environmental Laws• HB 1589 Electronic Waste

– Requires manufacturers of video display devices to recycle covered electronic devices that weigh at least 60% of the total weight of video display devices sold during the most recent 12 month period and prohibits some landfill disposal

– Requires manufacturers, collectors and recyclers to register with IDEM

– Requires reports and fees

12

2009 Environmental Laws• HB 1162 Environmental Matters

– Environmental Restrictive Ordinances– Environmental Restrictive Covenants– Prospective Purchaser Protection for Petroleum

Contamination– Recognition of Institutional Controls when

evaluating corrective action options– Allows subsequent conditions in project

completion decisions13

2009 Environmental Laws– Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that address

pollutants not listed on the 303(d) list must be public noticed before the new pollutant can be included in the TMDL

– Waters designated as Exceptional Use Waters are now Outstanding State Resource Waters

– Requires the Antidegradation process to include a one time review of general permits

– Clarifies that a person must have both any required local approvals and an IDEM permit

14

IDEM Enforcement2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*

Referrals 467 547 591 606 437 274

Violation Letters 4,980 4,268 4,024 3,958 4,092 19

Notices of Violation 318 202 427 420 321 254

Agreed Orders 314 258 417 372 364 297

Commissioner’s Orders 6 41 38 39 32 18

Dismissals 44 48 46 57 40 36

Complies/Closed 312 317 577 568 386 274

AG Referrals 17 4 33 52 22 24

15

* 2009 data is complete through November 30. 2009 Violation Letters do not include those issued directly by the programs.

Criminal Pleas and Convictions• Erler Industries, North Vernon, IN, Falsified

Title V Certifications– $1,000,000 criminal fine– $25,000 in restitution to Midwest Environmental

Enforcement Association– $100,000 in restitution to IDEM (hybrid vehicles)– Develop an environmental training program– Implement a zero tolerance policy for violations– Public apology in the local newspaper

16

Criminal Pleas and Convictions• Herb Corn—Rochester Indiana POTW Operator,

falsification of DMRs, MROs and NPDES permit renewal application.– Sentenced to 12 months in federal prison

• Alan Hersh—Hassan Barrel RCRA felonies (Fort Wayne).– Sentenced to 15 months plus restitution

• Wainwright, Gary, IN—gun charges– Sentenced to 108 months in federal prison

17

Agency Initiatives• Virtual File Cabinet—electronic filing system

with over 59,000,000 pages now online.• TEMPO—Enterprise wide electronic

integration of all IDEM information—part of the infrastructure to receive and process electronic permit applications and reports:– Two programs accepting electronic submittals, 401

Certifications and Community Right to Know.

18

Agency Initiatives• EDMR—Electronic reporting of waste water

discharge monitoring reports.– Currently available for all facilities.– EPA is considering a rule to require electronic

reporting for all DMRs.

• Agency-wide adoption of Continuous Improvement using Lean/Kaizen and other methodologies to improve processes and increase efficiency.

19

The New EPA• Administrator Jackson’s Stated Priorities:

– Environmental Justice– Children's Health– Climate Change

• The Initiatives we observe include:– Air Toxics Monitoring at Schools– Reemphasis of Enforcement and publishing of

compliance information– Progressing of Greenhouse Gas Regulations

20

Air Accomplishments• Entire State has met the 0.08 ppm Ozone air

quality standard since the 2006-2008 period, and we are working with USEPA to have Lake and Porter Counties designated attainment.

• Entire State also meet the 0.075 Ozone air quality standard for years 2008 & 2009.

• Entire state met current PM2.5 Air Quality Standards for the period 2007-2009.

21

Air Quality UpdateAt the end of 2009, all monitors in Indiana

measured attainment for all NAAQS for the first time since Standards were established.

Indiana is currently in attainment for all NAAQS but:

EPA keeps raising (in this case lowering) the bar!

Air Quality Standards

How low will they go?!?! 22

Insert new graph from Catherine

Ozone

23

Current Status of 8-Hour Ozone Areas through 2009

0.085 ppm

LawrenceburgTownship

0.067

Cass Co, MI

WAYNE

JACKSONCALHOUN

MONROE

WASHTENAWVAN BUREN KALAMAZOO

Wood

Adams

Union

Hardin

Highland

Hancock

Clinton

Madison

Fayette

Hamilton Co, OH

Wyandot

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Huntington

Hancock

Crawford

Dea

rbor

nBartholomew

Fayette Union

Floyd

Switzerland

Ohio

Blackford

Ve

rmill

ion

Vanderburgh

McLean

La Salle

Shelby

Piatt

Lake

Clark Co, IL

DeKalb

Marion

Pope

McHenry

Jefferson

Saline

De Witt

Franklin

Hamilton

Effingham

Boone

Moultrie

Johnson

Williamson

Hardin

0.080

0.0820.076

0.075

0.067

0.069

0.072

0.066

0.064

0.073

0.076

0.075

0.071

0.061

0.066

0.068

0.073

0.072

0.074

0.0700.070

0.069

0.068

0.066

0.070

0.070

0.068

0.073

0.070

0.066

0.072

0.074

0.076

0.074

0.073

0.070

0.069

0.068

0.075

0.071

0.069

0.066

0.072

0.077

0.077

8-hr Ozone Standard at 0.085 ppmBased on 2007 - 2009 Ozone Design Values

Legend

Values Over the Standard of 0.085 ppm

Values posted are in units of ppm.

Values Under the Standard of 0.085 ppm

Designated attainment

Designated nonattainment

0 25 5012.5 Mi

0 25 5012.5 Km

24

New 8-Hour Ozone Standard at 0.075 ppm

Based on 2007-2009 monitoring data

LawrenceburgTownship

0.067

Cass Co, MI

WAYNE

JACKSONCALHOUN

MONROE

WASHTENAWVAN BUREN KALAMAZOO

Wood

Adams

Union

Hardin

Highland

Hancock

Clinton

Madison

Fayette

Hamilton Co, OH

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Huntington

Hancock

Crawford

Dea

rbor

nBartholomew

Fayette Union

Floyd

Switzerland

Ohio

Blackford

Ve

rmill

ion

Vanderburgh

McLean

La Salle

Shelby

Piatt

Lake

Clark Co, IL

DeKalb

Pope

McHenry

Jefferson

Saline

De Witt

Hamilton

Effingham

Boone

Moultrie

Johnson

Hardin

0.080

0.0820.076

0.075

0.067

0.069

0.072

0.066

0.064

0.073

0.076

0.075

0.071

0.061

0.066

0.068

0.073

0.072

0.074

0.0700.070

0.069

0.068

0.066

0.070

0.070

0.068

0.073

0.070

0.066

0.072

0.074

0.076

0.074

0.073

0.070

0.069

0.068

0.075

0.071

0.069

0.066

0.072

0.077

0.077

8-hr Ozone Standard at 0.075 ppmBased on 2007 - 2009 Ozone Design Values

Legend

Values posted are in units of ppm.

Values Under the Standard of 0.075 ppm

Values Over the Standard of 0.075 ppm

Below the Standard

Above the Standard

0 25 5012.5 Mi

0 25 5012.5 Km

25

Current Status of Annual PM 2.5 Areas

(15 ug/m3) End of 2008

Lawrenceburg Twnshp

Washington Twnshp

Montgomery Twnshp

Ohio Twnshp

Madison Twnshp

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

FountainHamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

TippecanoeTipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

Fayette Union

Floyd

Switzerland

Huntington

DearbornBartholomew

Vermillion

Ohio

Vanderburgh

Blackford

Legend

PM 2.5 Counties

Attainment

Nonattainment

Proposed Redesignation to Attainment--not yet final 10/06/09

0 50 10025 Miles

0 50 10025 Kilometers

26

Indiana PM 2.5 Trends (Annual Standard in µg/m3)

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

17.0

18.0

2000-2002 2001-2003 2002-2004 2003-2005 2004-2006 2005-2007 2006-2008 2007-2ndQtr2009

Northw est IN LaPorte North Central IN Northeast IN Central IN Southw est IN Southeast IN

28

24-Hour PM 2.5 (35 ug/m3) designations to be based on data from 2006-2008

Lawrenceburg Twnshp

Washington Twnshp

Montgomery Twnshp

Ohio Twnshp

Madison Twnshp

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Madison

Newton

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Spencer

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

FountainHamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

Tippecanoe

Tipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Montgomery

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Johnson

Scott

Huntington

Hancock

Crawford

DearbornBartholomew

Fayette Union

Floyd

Switzerland

Ohio

Vermillion

Vanderburgh

Blackford

Legend

PM 2.5 Counties

Attainment/Unclassifiable

Attainment based on 2006-2008 data 10/06/09

0 50 10025 Miles

0 50 10025 Kilometers

29

30

Status of 2008 revised Lead Standard 0.15 ug/m3

Allen

Jay

Lake

Knox

Vigo

White

Jasper

Cass

Clay

Laporte

Pike

Rush

Parke

Grant

Greene

Perry

Ripley

Clark

Noble

Gibson

Porter

Wells

Posey

Elkhart

Owen

Henry

Boone

Miami

Jackson

Putnam

Dubois

Shelby

Pulaski Fulton

Marion

Wayne

Clinton

Sullivan

Harrison

Benton Carroll

Daviess Martin

Orange

Kosciusko

Monroe

Morgan

Marshall

Warrick

Wabash

Warren

Brown

DeKalb

Franklin

Adams

Starke

Decatur

Randolph

Lawrence

Whitley

Fountain Hamilton

Washington

St. Joseph

Tipton

Jennings

Delaware

Hendricks

Lagrange

Jefferson

Steuben

Howard

Scott

Hancock

Crawford

Union

Floyd

Madison

Newton

Spencer

Tippecanoe

Montgomery

Johnson

Huntington

DearbornBartholomew

Fayette

Ver

mill

ion

Switzerland

Ohio

Vanderburgh

Blackford

Legend

Location of Indiana's Proposed Nonattainment Area

Attainment/Unclassifiable

Attainment-Based on Monitoring Data 10/05/09

Delaware

0 40 8020 Miles

0 40 8020 Kilometers

0 5 102.5 Miles

0 5 102.5 Kilometers

Status of RedesignationsOzone

Lake and Porter Counties• Redesignation petition originally submitted in September 2006• Revised petition using ’06-’08 monitoring data at EPA, proposed approval expected any day

Dearborn County (Lawrenceburg Township)• Redesignation petition under development• Final submission expected in early 2010

PM2.5Lake and Porter Counties

• Redesignation petition submitted to U.S. EPA on April 3, 2008 for approval• EPA prepared to proceed now that Chicago portion of MSA meets std

Southwest Indiana • Redesignation petition submitted to U.S. EPA on April 3, 2008 for approval• U.S. EPA is in the process of drafting a proposed notice of approval

Central Indiana•Redesignation petition submitted to U.S.EPA on October 20, 2009 for approval

31

MOVING TARGETSStatus of Review of NAAQS

Current/Previous Status of Review What to Expect

8-Hour Ozone .085 ppm EPA is reconsidering .075 ppm standard .060 - .070 ppm

Annual PM 2.5 15 µg/m3 EPA is reconsidering 2006 review of standard 12 µg/m3

CO 9 ppm 8-hour; 35 ppm 1-hour Early stages of review process Little to no change

NO2 0.053 ppm annualComment period on proposed new standard closed

0.065 ppm-0.150 ppm (99th percentile of 1-hour max.)

SO20.03 ppm annual; 0.14 ppm 24-hour Currently under review 0.05 ppm – 0.10 ppm 1-hour

Lead 1.5 µg/m3 quarterly avg. EPA finalized new standard October 20080.15 µg/m3 rolling 3-month; 1.5 quarterly avg.

32

Indiana Air Rulemaking Update

These rules will assist Indiana in maintaining compliance with the current ozone standard, attain the new ozone standard, and help address interstate transport:

• Degreasing - Extend Statewide• Consumer/Commercial Products - Add Statewide• Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings - Add Statewide• Stage I Vapor Recovery - Extend Applicability• Auto Refinishing - Extend Statewide

33

Indiana Air Rulemaking Update

Outdoor Hydronic Heater Rule Second Notice Published in Indiana Register on January 6, 2010Rule First Noticed in 2005Reviews by EQSC and EPA/NESCAUM Model RuleProposed Rule will require new units to meet emission limitsProposed Rule will require existing units that do not meet the proposed emission limits to install smoke stacks and cease operations in the warmer part of the year

34

BP Whiting Title V Permit Objection

• IDEM Construction Permit Issued May 1, 2008 after extensive USEPA review

• Petitioners Request for Permit Objection filed with USEPA on June 18, 2008

• EPA signed the Objection Order October 16, 2009

• IDEM plans to meet all of EPAs objections

35

Office of Water Quality Priorities• Anti-Degradation Rule• Steel Mill Permits• Rethinking OWQ• Preparing for new Drinking Water Rules• Watershed Initiative• NPDES Compliance: Small Systems and SSOs• Virtual File Cabinet• Tempo• Expedited Compliance Initiative• Compliance Assistance

36

• NPDES Permits.• Combined Sewers—97 IDEM lead and 3 EPA

lead complete. Seven EPA lead communities left: Anderson, Elkhart, Evansville, Gary, Hammond, Mishawaka, South Bend.

• Dredging—West Branch Grand Cal in progress.• Blue Green Algae.

Office of Water QualityActivities

37

• NPDES Permit Backlog Reduction– 2005: 263 backlogged permits– 2009: 6 backlogged permits– List includes:

• USS Gary Works. Public Noticed. Comment Period Ended. Next step is issuance.

• US Midwest. Under EPA review.• Arcelor Mittal Burns Harbor. Under EPA review• Arcelor Mittal Indiana Harbor East. Drafting.• Arcelor Mittal Indiana Harbor West. Drafting.• Hoosier Merom. Drafting.

Office of Water QualityActivities

38

Office of Water QualityActivities

• Blue Green Algae– Blue Green Algae in Central Indiana Reservoirs– This Algae known as Cynobacteria that can produce

toxins• Microcystins - liver, tumor promotor• Saxitoxins - neurotoxin• Anatoxin-a - neurotoxin• Anatoxin-b - neurotoxin• Nodularins - liver, tumor promotor• Lipopolysaccharide - inflammation• Cylindrospermopsin – liver other organs

Office of Water QualityActivities

• Blue Green Algae– Center for Earth and Environmental Science, DNR, ISDH,

IDEM Collaboration.– Dr. Lenore Tedesco from the Center for Earth and

Environmental Science collecting and analyzing samples in Geist, Morse, and Eagle Creek Reservoirs.

– IDEM Monitoring Upper Fall Creek Watershed– IDEM updates conditions in reservoirs and posts to website:

• Idem.in.gov/algae

– EQSC Report calls for expanded monitoring.

40

Office of Water QualityRulemaking: Antidegradation

• What is Antidegradation?• Federal requirement that allows for discharge of

pollutants to water under specific circumstances.• Indiana law defines how we will make those

allowances and the rulemaking addresses implementation of the law.

41

Office of Water QualityRulemaking: Antidegradation

• Where does this rule apply?• The current antidegradation rule only applies to the

Great Lakes basin.• The proposed Draft Rule expands the

antidegradation procedures to apply to all waters across the entire state;

42

Office of Water QualityRulemaking: Antidegradation

• What will this rule do?• Increases public opportunities for information and

input;• Protects current "fishable/swimmable“ and other

existing uses of waters;• Allows for the issuance of legal permits for

discharges to water; and,• Does not allow the violation of water quality

standards.

43

• What is the process for this rule?– IDEM held Stakeholder meetings over two years and

drafted rule language.– IDEM held four public meetings.– Draft rule language was ‘second noticed’ for 45 days

in the December 16, 2009 Indiana Register.– After public notice, IDEM summarizes comments,

may make changes to the rule– Draft Rule will be presented to the Water Pollution

Control Board for preliminary/final adoption. – EPA will review the rule as well.

Office of Water QualityRulemaking: Antidegradation

44

Office of Land Quality Activities

• Revisions to RISC• ELTF Rule Revision• CFO Rule Revisions• Clean Yard Program• Compliance Assistance (W.A.R.N.)

45

Revisions to RISC

• RiskHEA 1162

• Focus shifted to managing risk• Greater consideration of engineering and institutional controls• Removal still an option

Institutional Controls Registry• Environmental Restrictive Covenants• Environmental Restrictive Ordinances• www.in.gov/idem/files/institutional_controls_registry_report.pdf

46

ELTF Rule Revisions

Updating Excess Liability Trust Fund Rule• Revising allowable costs• Clarifying claim process• Clarifying substantial compliance definition• Second Notice with proposed language Oct 09• Reviewing comments and making revisions• Financial Assurance Board meeting

47

CFO Rule Revisions• Federal CAFO Rule Changes• Eliminate General NPDES permits for CAFOs • CFO Rule Revisions to incorporate CAFO’s• Significant Topics for Consideration

– Phosphorus limits on land application– Winter pump down– Mortality management– Public notice requirements

48

Clean Yard Program

• ≈ 500 Auto Salvage Yards in Indiana• Initial compliance evaluation (multi-media)• Workbook, 3 workshops, DVD• Criteria for Clean Yard Recognition (50)

– 33 submitted return to compliance plans

• Gold Level Awards (3)• Follow-up on non-participants

49

Questions?

Tom EasterlyCommissioner

Indiana Department of Environmental Management317-232-8611

teasterly@idem.in.gov

50