id941 international benchmarking & openness of cities uclg, durban 14 june 2011 prof. dr. urs...
TRANSCRIPT
id9
41
International Benchmarking & Openness of Cities
UCLG, Durban14 June 2011
Prof. Dr. Urs MüllerDirektor BAKBASEL
id9
41
3
Content
Why benchmarking?
What can be benchmarked?
What is your economic performance?
What are your location factors?
Does openness matter?
id9
41
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2000 2009
GDP per capita
Note In 1'000 US$ (at current prices and exchange rates)Source BAKBASEL
id9
41
5
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
90-00 00-09
Employment growth
Note In % p.a.Source BAKBASEL
id9
41
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000 2009
Hourly productivity
Note In US$ per hour worked (at current prices and exchange rates)Source BAKBASEL
id9
41
7
Economic performance profile of Madrid
Note Position of Madrid within the benchmarking sample (for each indicator, percentiles) Higher values indicate a better performance
Source BAKBASEL
GDP per Capita
Real GDP growth per Capita
Population growth
Real GDP growth
Employment growth
Labour productivity
Real labour productivity growth
Hourly productivity
Real hourly productivity growth
Macr
o P
erf
orm
ance
Madrid
50% 75%25%-- ++
id9
41
8
Global and continental accessibility
Note Index (average accessibility of regions 2002 = 100), 2008Source BAKBASEL, IVT
Cataluña
Milano
FrankfurtRheinMain
Greater London
Ile de France
Metropolitan Stuttgart
Greater Brussels
Metropolitan Munich
Greater Dublin Area
Madrid
Stockholm
Lazio
Vienna
Berlin
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
102 104 106 108 110 112 114 116 118 120 122global
cont
inen
tal
id9
41
9
Tax burden for companies and manpower
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
Effective Tax Burden of Highly Qualified Employees (Single, € 100,000),Average of Included Swiss Cantons = 100
Eff
ec
tiv
e T
ax
Bu
rde
n o
f C
om
pa
nie
s,
Ave
rag
e o
f In
clu
ded
Sw
iss
Can
ton
s =
100
IR
USA
ZG
ZH
UK
NLAT
DEIT
FR
GE
HUSLO
SK
SE
CZ PL
LUXFI
BEL
ES
NO
DK
HK
SGP
CN
id9
41
10
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
Research for innovation: Quality of universities
Note Total scores of all Universities in region in the Shanghai Index per 1’000 inhabitants, 2009Source BAKBASEL
id9
41
11
Economic attractiveness profile of Madrid
Note Position of Madrid within the benchmarking sample (for each indicator, percentiles) Higher values indicate a better performance
Source BAKBASEL
Taxation (Companies)
Taxation (Manpower)
Accessibility (Global)
Accessibility (Continental)
Regulation (Product Market)
Regulation (Labour Market)
Universities quality: TS per 100'000 inhabitants
Patent density
Publication density
Expenditures on research and development
Inn
ova
tio
nT
axat
ion
Acc
essi
bili
tyR
egu
lati
on
Madrid
50% 75%25%-- ++
id9
41
12
Softer factors are becoming more relevant
Quality of Livingsum of all factors making life more or less convenient
Diversityfact, that a city has people with different nationality, origin, language or religion/belief
Opennesscapacity to attract international populations and to enable them to contribute to the future success of the city
Interculturalityapproach to integration in cities with culturally diverse populations, encouraging greater mixing and interaction between diverse groups in the public spaces.
… and more
id9
41
13
How to measure openness: OPENCities Monitor
Values above/below 100 indicate that the performance of Cape Town in an area is better/worse than the sample average.
Cape Town is above the average in the following areas:
Migration
Education
Cape Town performs particularly lower than the average in:
Barriers of entry
Infrastructure
results for Cape Town results for selected cities sample