icd 12 -interface control document for roads librar… · icd 12 -interface control document for...

II Document title:

Document number:

Contract:

Department:

NOTE:

Approved by:

1111111111111111111111111 III R11582115

lSSlEOBY APPWfPPDC

ICD 12 - Interface Control Document for Roads

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-OI-012, Rev 5

DE-AC27-01RV14136 Contract deliverable: C_9.1

Project Management

AU WTP Interface Partner concurrence signatures found 00 the

following page shall be obtained prior to approval of this ICD.

Steve Ristow 1d!i2

Issue Status:

Date Issued:

River Protection Project Waste Treatment Plant 2435 Stevens Center Place Richland, WA99354 United States of America Tel: 509 371 2000

Print Name ~ Signature

ICD 12 Team Lead and Principal Author

Approved

4c,/O!2, ;20/~

NOTE: This document defines current service needs, future needs, and service gaps. The identified service levels do not represent contractual obligations between service recipient and providers. Future contractual and funding actions to close service gaps will be accomplished by integration between the federal offices as part of the budget planning process.

24590-PADC-F00041 Rev 6 (1/ 22/ 2009)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-012,Rev 5 ICD 12 - Interface Control Document for Roads

WTP Interface Partner Concurrence

Interface Owners (lOs) including DOE~ORP and DOE-RL when appropriate, will sign ICD concurrence sheets indicating their concurrence with the leD contents. These concurrence signatures signify that the leD accurately reflects current contract baselines, except as indicated in Appendix A, Open leD Issues and Actions. This ICD shall not be approved until all concurrence signatures on this page have been obtained.

Organization Position

WTP rCD 12 Interface Owner

TOC ICD 12 Interface Owner

MSC ICD 12 Interface Owner

DOE-RL 1ICD 12 Interface Owner

DOE-ORP 1ICD 12 Interface Owner

J)?&:- ORP rORP- W1f ASSiSTOt.TI'\

Do£-ORP r 0 R f DeyllTi Mo.no.1-r

Name

Bill Clements OR Sal Beltran

Stuart Ann

Kelly Kelly

1Sharee Dickinson

1Jennifer Sands

Bi \I I-I ame\

ST().C)( Char bOneA'"

Signature Date

;~6IJ

fJ~~ I lIb 113>

1:(7'3

~~I~"IB / C) I , ~

NOTE: This document defines current service needs, future needs, and service gaps. The identified service levels do not represent contractual obligations between service recipient and providers. Future contractual and funding actions to close service gaps will be accomplished by integration between the federal offices as part of the budget planning process.

Pageii

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-012, Rev 5 ICD 12 - Interface Control Document for Roads

History Sheet Rev Date Reason for revision Revised by

A 16 July 2001 Issued for ORP Concurrence A Wong

0 14 Mar 2002 Provided to ORP Contracting Officer to issue as operative ICD. This A Wong document supersedes BNFL-5193-ID-12, Rev 6.

15 Nov 2002 Provided for ORP Contracting Officer to issue as operative ICD as R Ciolli part of the required ICD update. Incorporated ICF 24590-WTP-ICFENG-02-00 I.

2 15 Nov 2003 Provided for ORP Contracting Officer to issue as operative ICD as R Ciolli part of the required ICD update.

3 06 Jun 2008 Periodic update. Transitioned tracking of all Issues and Action Items J Minor to the Action Tracking System (ATS). There are no open Issues or Actions associated with this ICD at this time.

4 02 Dec 2009 DOE-ORP Letter to N. F. Grover dated Aug 1,2008, Contract No. J Minor DE-AC27-01RV14136 - Direction to Make Changes and Re-Issue Interface Control Documents (ICD) 5, 6,9, 1J, 12, and 19 (CCN 183784)

5 Periodic update. S. Ristow

Page iii

1.7

1.7

2

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-Ol-012, Rev 5 ICD 12 - Interface Control Document for Roads

Revision Description leD Section III Description

Updated entire document to format described in 24590-WTP-GPP-MGT-003, Rev 6, Interface ControlAll Procedure. I Changed description of responsibilities to agree with 4-column format of Table I.1.2 I

1.2, 1.8, 1.10

&1

1.10, Table 2

&1

AppC

Added "MSC-PRO-52 I50, Rev 0, Oversize/Overweight Moves" as Reference (MSA 2012). In table I, "Notify the DOE in advance of any loads or clearances that exceed site transportation limits described in the WTP contract" changed to, ''Notify the DOE in advance of any loads or clearances that exceed site transportation limits as described in MSC PRO 52150, Oversize/Overweight Moves (MSA 2012)" because the WTP Contract does not describe any site transportation limits.

Second paragraph, just before the last sentence, added the following: "Logistics Operational Research (OR) models have been developed to assess the potential logistics and transportation impacts on WTP. The number and types of vehicles (for example, delivery, service, and persOlmel vehicles) carried by the roads during WTP operations are induded in these assessments. Traffic during operations is dominated by worker personnel vehicle traffic (WRPS 2012a).

Added "RPP-RPT-51 013 , Rev 0, January 4,2012. Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) Logistics Operational Research (OR) Model Assessment Report" to the References Section.

Added the following new third paragraph, "For planning purposes, the TOC expects that the route for ILAW shipments between WTP and the Integrated Disposal Facility win be along Canton Ave and 1st Street. Upgrades to these existing roads will need to be evaluated (CH2 2001)."

Added the following new fourth paragraph, "For planning purposes, the TOC expects that the route for IHLW shipments between WTP and the Interim Hanford Storage (IRS) facility will be along Canton Ave and around the north side and east side of the ETF. Upgrades to these existing roads will need to be evaluated (WRPS 2012b)."

Deleted the following reference because there are no references to it in the text and the document is no longer retrievable:

W 519 C I, Construction Specification, W-5J9 TWRS Privatization Phase I Site/Utility Systems (NRC 1999)

Added the foHowing two References:

0 CH2 . 2001. Conceptual Design Report for Immobilized Low Activity Waste Disposal Facility, Project W 520, RPP 7908, Rev O. June 2001. CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, WA, USA.

0 WRPS. 2012b. Interim Hanford Storage Conceptual Design Report, RPP-RPT-52 176, Rev O. June 15, 2012. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA, USA.

Added the following three Open Items:

0 Route to IDF needs to be evaluated and considered in the long range planning.

0 Route to IHS needs to be evaluated and considered in the long range planning.

0 Address concerns related to maintaining route 11A12S during the 2013 ISAP review cycle.

,

I

I

Pageiv

I

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-012, Rev 5 ICD 12 -Interface Control Document for Roads

Acronyms and Abbreviations

BNI

BOF

DOE-ORP

DOE-RL

ICD

MSC

NHC

RAMI

RPP

TOC

WTP

Bechtel National, Incorporated

Balance of Facilities

Department of Energy, Office of River Protection

Department of Energy, Richland Office

Interface Control Document

Mission Support Contractor

Numatec Hanford Corporation

Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Inspectability

River Protection Project

Tank Operating Contractor

Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant

Page v


Contents

1 Interface Description .............................................................................................................1

1.1 Interface Definition ................................................................................................................................ 1

1.2 Functional Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Physical Interfaces ................................................................................................................................. 1

1.4 Administrative Interfaces ...................................................................................................................... 1

1.5 Schedule .................................................................................................................................................. 1

1.6 Road Construction and Maintenance........................ ........................................................................... 3

1.7 Request for Upgrades of Existing Roads System ................................................................................ 3

1.8 Protocol and Procedure for Temporary Road Closures..................................................................... 3

1.9 Acceptance Criteria .............. ~................................................................................................................ 4

1.10 Configuration Management Items........................................................................................................ 4

2 References ..............................................................................................................................5

Tables

Table 1 Requirements for Roads ................................................................................................... 2

Table 2 Interface Configuration Management Items ..................................................................4

Appendices

Appendix A - Open ICD 12 Issues and Actions ...................................................................... A-i

Appendix B - Issues and Actions Closed Since Last Revision ............................................... B-i

Appendix C - ICD 12 Open Items List..................................................................................... C-i

Page vi

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-Ol-012, Rev 5 ICD 12 - Interface Control Document fo.r Roads

1 Interface Description

1.1 Interface Dermition

This interface document defines the physical and administrative interfaces for roads providing access to the River Protection Project (RPP) - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) site and roads within the WTP site.

1.2 Functional Requirements

Table 1 (following page) presents the top-level interface requirements for each organization with responsibility for a part of this interface. Column 1 presents WTP interface responsibilities identified in the WTP baseline. Column 2 presents Tank Operations Contractor (TOC) interface responsibilities identified in the TOC baseline. Column 3 presents Mission Support Contractor (MSC) interface responsibilities identified in the MSC baseline. Column 4 presents interface actions for US Department of Energy (DOE) or other Hanford Site contractors necessary to support this interface.

1.3 Physical Interfaces

During the construction period, the portion of WTP Loop Road within the WTP site perimeter will be assigned to the WTP Contractor. The portion ofWTP Loop Road outside the WTP site perimeter will be under MSC control. Therefore, during construction, the physical interface locations for roads will be the sections of WTP Loop Road that cross the WTP site perimeter. Physical interface locations are shown on the Interface Control Drawing (BNI 2009).

1.4 Administrative Interfaces

The respective organizations' design processes include integrated safety management principles and are communicated through the interface in safety analysis reports identified in Table 2.

No new hazards or accident scenarios are expected to be introduced through this interface that are not adequately controlled by the interface contractors and through controls placed across this interface. The physical and administrative controls to mitigate these risks using a graded approach have been or will be adequately addressed through requirements on each contractor ' s authorization basis.

The ICD team has not identified any deactivation or reliability, availability, maintainability, and inspectability (RAMI) considerations that require management across the interface. Systematic RAMI assessments of this interface have not been conducted.

Due to the nature of the interface, there is no need to include a block diagram at this time.

1.5 Schedule

Work activity for preparing the site and assuming occupancy began 1 October 2001 . Construction of WTP Loop Road was completed prior to site occupancy by the WTP Contractor.

Page 1

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-Ol-012, Rev 5 leO 12 - Interface Control Document for Roads

Table 1 Requirements for Roads

The Waste Treatment Plant Contractor Shall ... Tbe Tank Operations Contractor Shall ... The Mission Support Contractor ShaU... DOE Will ...

I Notify the DOE, 30 calendar days in advance, of road closures the WTP Contractor requires outside its boundary.

I No action 1 Manage road closures outside the WTP Contractor 's site boundary as necessary.

Notify the WTP Contractor in writing at least 30 calendar days in advance of scheduled interruption of services.

Assess information provided, coordinate with the TOC and WTP Contractor to determine impacts.

1 Take appropriate measures to minimize impacts to site infrastructure and assist in resolution of any conflicts with site requirements.

2 Notify the DOE in advance of any loads or clearances that exceed site transportation limits as described in MSC-PRO-52150, Oversize/Overweight Moves (MSA 2012).

2 No action 2 Assess information and coordinate with the TOC and WTP Contractor to determine if loads that exceed site size or weight limits can be accommodated.

2 Assist in resolution ofany conflicts with site requirements.

3 Provide the DOE any updates to Hanford Site road needs.

Provide to the DOE any updates on the demand on the existing Hanford Site Roads system.

I

3 No action 3 Provide road access between the WTP Contractor's site boundary and existing Hanford Site roads, in accordance with the WTP Contractor' s approved baseline schedule.

3

I

Plan for and direct the Mission Support Contractor (MSC) to maintain Hanford Site roads, including:

• Route 4S to/from the Wye barricade to the WTP's South I Access Gate 23.

• Route 2S/ 11 A to from the Wye and Yakima barricades to the WTP North Access Gate 31 .

• Local 200 E Area access roads, to/from the WTP .

Determine if upgrades to the existing Hanford Site road system are beneficial.

4 Provide and maintain roads within its own permanent and temporary construction site boundaries.

------

4 No action 4 Maintain the existing paved Hanford Site roads in the vicinity of the WTP Contractor's facility that provide access to the WTP site.

4 No action

Page 2


1.6 Road Construction and Maintenance

The DOE has provided paved roads to the WTP site from the existing Hanford site roads. The MSC will maintain all paved roads in the vicinity of, and that provide access to the WTP site, including roads to the two vehicle access gates (South Gate 23 and North Gate 31) to/from the Yakima and Wye barricades.

The WTP Contmctor will construct andlor maintain all roads within the boundaries of the WTP site. The WTP Contractor will exercise due care in the use of all DOE roads and will be responsible for repair of any damage that occurs due to WTP Contractor construction activities.

1.7 Req uest for Upgrades of Existing Roads System

As the facility design matures, the WTP Contractor win notify the DOE if upgrades to the existing road system at the Hanford Site may be beneficial. If the DOE proposes permanent closure of any Hanford Site roads that may be used by the WTP Contractor, the WTP Contractor shall be provided the opportunity to review the closure proposal and provide impacts and recommendations to the DOE.

For planning purposes, the WTP Contractor estimates that during peak construction activities, up to 2700 personnel will access the WTP site each day. The majority will access the WTP site during the day shift, with the remainder working an off-shift. During conunissioning, approximately 1500 personnel will access the WTP Contractor site. Logistics Operational Research (OR) models have been developed to assess the potential logistics and transportation impacts on WTP. The number and types of vehicles (for example, delivery, service, and personnel vehicles) carried by the roads during WTP operations are included in these assessments. Traffic during operations is dominated by worker personnel vehicle traffic (WRPS 2012a). The DOE will determine if upgrades to the existing road system are beneficial.

For planning purposes, the TOC expects that the route for ILA W shipments between WTP and the Integrated Disposal Faci]ity will be along Canton Ave and 1 st Street. Upgrades to these existing roads will need to be evaluated (CH2 2001).

For planning purposes, the TOC expects that the route for IHL W shipments between WTP and the Interim Hanford Storage (lliS) facility will be along Canton Ave and around the north side and east side of the ETF. Upgrades to these existing roads will need to be evaluated (WRPS 2012b).

ICD 03 - Interface Control Documentfor Radioactive Solid Waste (BNI 2012c) identifies the size and load envelopes for the melters that will require transport outside the WfP site. These are the bounding parameters for the melters.

1.8 Protocol and Procedure for Temporary Road Closures

The WTP Contractor will provide the DOE written notification that identifies the date(s), time(s), size, and weight of loads that exceed transportation limits for the Hanford road system as described in MSC PRO 52150, Oversize/Overweight Moves (MSA 2012). The WTP Contractor will provide written notification at least 30 calendar days in advance of the scheduled date for transportation that might require road closure. The DOE will review this information and provide written acceptance of the scheduled transportation date within 7 calendar days of receiving the notification from the WTP Contractor. The DOE shan be responsible for all necessary arrangements and expenditures for closure of affected roads for transportation of the excess load(s) by the WTP Contractor. The DOE is responsible for notifYing all appropriate entities.

Page 3


Road closures, or rolling road closures, may be required by the Hanford Sitewide Transportation Safety Document, DOEIRL-200 1-36 (DOE 2011) when transporting waste shipments (for example, ILA W containers).

Proposed road closures shall be coordinated with the DOE Richland Operations Office for review of potential impacts including emergency vehicle access to the WTP Contractor site. Emergency vehicle access within the WTP site will be the responsibility of the WTP Contractor and its emergency services provider.

1.9 Acceptance Criteria

Any acceptance criteria deemed necessary for roads will be mutually agreed upon by the interfacing parties, in accordance with turnover need dates.

1.10 Configuration Management Items

This section identifies the specific referenced documents that further define the physical and/or administrative details of the interface. Interface impacting changes to the documents listed in the following table shall be agreed to by the impacted parties prior to approving the changes. The following table provides a tabular summary of these referenced documents.

Table 2 Interface Configuration Management Items

WTP Documents I

24590-WTP-PSAR-ESH-O 1-002-0 1, Preliminary Safety Analysis Report to Support Construction Authorization (BNI20 12b)

WTP Drawings

24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001, Interface Control Drawing (BNl 2009)

Interfacing Organization Documents

MSC-PRO-52150, Rev 0, OversizelOvenveight Moves (MSA 2012)

Interfacing Organization Drawings

None

24590-BOF-Pl-50-00001, RPP-WTP Plot Plan (BNI 2012a) .

24590-BOF-CS-C12T-00031, WTP Site Key Plan Roads North - South (BNI 2006a)

24590-BOF-CS-C12T-00032, WTP Site Key Plan Roads East West (BNl 2006b)

Page 4

2


References

BNI. 2006a. WTP Site Key Plan Roads North - South, 24590-BOF -CS-C12T -00031, Rev 1. June 2006. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA, USA.

BNI. 2006b. WTP Site Key Plan Parking and Roads East - West, 24590-BOF-CS-CI2T-00032, Rev 1. June 2006. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, W A, USA.

BNI. 2009. Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-0000l, Rev 1. August 2009. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, W A, USA.

BNI. 2012a. RPP-WTP Plot Plan, 24590-BOF-Pl-50-00001, Rev 7. September 2012. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA, USA.

BNI. 2012b. Preliminary Safety Analysis Report to Support Construction Authorization, 24590-WTP-PSAR-ESH-01-002-01 2012. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA, USA.

BNI. 2012c. ICD 03, Interface Control Documentfor Radioactive Solid Waste, 24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-003, Rev 4. October 2012. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA, USA.

CH2. 2001. Conceptual Design Reportfor Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal Facility, Project W-520, RPP~7908, Rev O. June 2001. CH2M Hll..L Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, W A, USA.

DOE. 2011. Hanford Sitewide Transportation Safety Document, DOE/RL-200 1-36, US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

MSA. 2012. Oversize/Overweight Moves, MSC-PRO-52150, Rev 0, April 18, 2012. Mission Support Alliance, LLC, Richland, W A, USA.

NRC. 2000. Civil PC Loop Road Plan & Profile, H-2-829681, Sheets 4 and 5, Rev 1. July 2000. Numatec Hanford Corporation, Richland, W A, USA.

WRPS. 2012a. RPP-RPT-51013, Rev 0, January 4,2012. Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) Logistics Operational Research (OR) Model Assessment Report, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Richland, W A, USA.

WRPS. 2012b. Interim Hanford Storage Conceptual Design Report, RPP-RPT~52176, Rev O. June 15, 2012. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, W A, USA.

Page 5


Appendix A - Open leD 12 Issues and Actions

Issue I Action Tracking # Issue I Action

# ,

-

Baseline (In-Out-NI A)

WTP PRCTOC 1 Page(s)

PageA-i


Appendix B - Issues and Actions Closed Since Last Revision

Issue / Action

# Tracking #

I

Issue / Action Date

Closed Resolution

None

Page 8-i

I


Appendix C - ICD 12 Open Items List

NOTE: 24590-WTP-PL-MG-OI-001, Interface Management P]an defines ICD Issues as one of two things; 1) Incompatibilities between contractor baselines and, 2) Incomplete interfaces. ICD Actions are defined as discreet activities engaged to resolve [CD Issues. There are items that do not fit the description of ICD Issues or ICD Actions found in the IMP that still require tracking. This does not mean these items are unimportant. The following list is a way of tracking these items to resolution. Depending on events related to these items, some of these items may be elevated to become ICD Issues or ICD Actions and others may be closed aDd removed from this list in future revisions to ICD 12. When an item on this list is closed, the resolution will be recorded in the Status column and it will appear in the next revision of ICD 12 with the resolution. In the revision after that, the item will be removed from the list, since it will have become part of the historical record.

I Item

Description Source Status#

0001 Route to IDF needs to be evaluated and considered in the long range planning.

J. Canning I

OPEN

0002 Route to IHS needs to be evaluated and considered in the long range planning.

J. Canning OPEN

0003 Address concerns related to maintaining route llAl2S during the 2013 ISAP review cycle.

S. T. Arm OPEN

Page C-i