hysteresis processes and effective rainfall...

4
May 24 26, 2017, Barcelona, Spain JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding Page1 HYSTERESIS PROCESSES AND EFFECTIVE RAINFALL HISTORIES Guido Rianna*, Alfredo Reder* , Luca Pagano , Luca Comegna° * CMCC Foundation, Capua (CE), Italy Università degli Studi di Napoli, Napoli, Italy °Università degli Studi della Campania, Aversa (CE), Italy The research is aimed to investigate how accounting for (or not) hydraulic hysteresis could influence the prediction of pore water pressures in partially saturated pyroclastic soils of Cam- pania Region. The issue is particularly interesting as, in last years, they have been frequently affected by rainfall induced landslides. The analysis is based on i) deep investigations per- formed on such soils through field monitoring, laboratory test and physical models allowing to calibrate and validate a widely adopted literature model and ii) numerical analysis designed to detect the main features distinguishing the predictions of pore water pressures carried out taken into account hydraulic hysteresis. Keywords: pyroclastic covers, hysteresis, Soil-water characteristic curve, landslide triggering weather patterns 1. INTRODUCTION In last years, weather-induced landslides largely affected pyroclastic covers of Campanian Re- gion, Southern Italy (Sarno, 1998; Cervinara, 1999; Nocera, 1997 and 2005; Ischia, 2006). Un- der usual conditions, the partially saturated state of the soil and then the contribution provided by suction to soil tightening can significantly increase soil shear strength permitting them to be stable also on very steep relieves. Wetting phenomena (primarily precipitation), increasing soil water content, can remarkably reduce such contributions up to attain local slope failure condi- tions (Pagano et al., 2010). Due to the complexity of the investigated issues, the investigations about hydraulic soil state conditions inducing the events require the adoption of numerical methods. To this aim, the soil hydraulic behavior of an unsaturated soil is usually modelled by assigning two main functions: i) soilwater characteristic curve (SWCC) and ii) hydraulic conductivity function. However, many researches proved how both relationships exhibit a hysteretic behavior (e.g. Poulovassilis, 1962) while different studies have widely demonstrated in the laboratory, field and numerical investigations the relevance of the hysteresis for both soil hydraulic (Lenhard and Parker, 1987b) and mechanical response (Likos et al., 2014). The main goal of our research is to deepen the role of hydraulic hysteresis on the triggering of landslide events involving silty pyroclastic soils. It is accomplished by first studying the hysteretic behavior of the soils in hand, basing it on experimental results coming from laboratory tests and a physical model (Rianna et al., 2014) interpreted by suitable hysteretic model. Subsequently, through numerical analysis aimed to evaluate the hydrological behavior of a silty pyroclastic cover under the action of virtual atmos- pheric conditions. Finally, by comparing these theoretical results with ones obtained in the hy- pothesis of non-hysteretic behavior.

Upload: vuongdieu

Post on 16-May-2019

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

M a y 2 4 – 2 6 , 2 0 1 7 , B a r c e l o n a , S p a i n

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding Page1

HYSTERESIS PROCESSES AND EFFECTIVE RAINFALL HISTORIES

Guido Rianna*, Alfredo Reder*†, Luca Pagano†, Luca Comegna°

* CMCC Foundation, Capua (CE), Italy

†Università degli Studi di Napoli, Napoli, Italy

°Università degli Studi della Campania, Aversa (CE), Italy

The research is aimed to investigate how accounting for (or not) hydraulic hysteresis could

influence the prediction of pore water pressures in partially saturated pyroclastic soils of Cam-

pania Region. The issue is particularly interesting as, in last years, they have been frequently

affected by rainfall induced landslides. The analysis is based on i) deep investigations per-

formed on such soils through field monitoring, laboratory test and physical models allowing to

calibrate and validate a widely adopted literature model and ii) numerical analysis designed to

detect the main features distinguishing the predictions of pore water pressures carried out taken

into account hydraulic hysteresis.

Keywords: pyroclastic covers, hysteresis, Soil-water characteristic curve, landslide triggering

weather patterns

1. INTRODUCTION

In last years, weather-induced landslides largely affected pyroclastic covers of Campanian Re-

gion, Southern Italy (Sarno, 1998; Cervinara, 1999; Nocera, 1997 and 2005; Ischia, 2006). Un-

der usual conditions, the partially saturated state of the soil and then the contribution provided

by suction to soil tightening can significantly increase soil shear strength permitting them to be

stable also on very steep relieves. Wetting phenomena (primarily precipitation), increasing soil

water content, can remarkably reduce such contributions up to attain local slope failure condi-

tions (Pagano et al., 2010).

Due to the complexity of the investigated issues, the investigations about hydraulic soil state

conditions inducing the events require the adoption of numerical methods. To this aim, the soil

hydraulic behavior of an unsaturated soil is usually modelled by assigning two main functions:

i) soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC) and ii) hydraulic conductivity function. However,

many researches proved how both relationships exhibit a hysteretic behavior (e.g. Poulovassilis,

1962) while different studies have widely demonstrated in the laboratory, field and numerical

investigations the relevance of the hysteresis for both soil hydraulic (Lenhard and Parker,

1987b) and mechanical response (Likos et al., 2014). The main goal of our research is to deepen

the role of hydraulic hysteresis on the triggering of landslide events involving silty pyroclastic

soils. It is accomplished by first studying the hysteretic behavior of the soils in hand, basing it

on experimental results coming from laboratory tests and a physical model (Rianna et al., 2014)

interpreted by suitable hysteretic model. Subsequently, through numerical analysis aimed to

evaluate the hydrological behavior of a silty pyroclastic cover under the action of virtual atmos-

pheric conditions. Finally, by comparing these theoretical results with ones obtained in the hy-

pothesis of non-hysteretic behavior.

M a y 2 4 – 2 6 , 2 0 1 7 , B a r c e l o n a , S p a i n

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding Page2

2. METHODS AND DATA

Among the several approaches proposed in literature (Iwata et al., 1995), the Lenhard-Parker

(LP) approach (1987a,b) is adopted. It predicts the wetting and drying scanning curves scaled

from the respective main wetting (w) and drying (d) curves defined through the Mualem-van

Genuchten approach (1980):

𝜃−𝜃𝑟

𝜃𝑠−𝜃𝑟= 𝛩 = (1 + (𝛼𝑠)𝑛)−𝑚 𝑘 = 𝑘𝑠𝛩𝜆 (1 − (1 − 𝛩

1𝑚⁄ )

𝑚

)2

(1)

where 𝜃𝑟(𝜃𝑠) represents residual (saturated) volumetric water content; 𝑘(𝑘𝑠)hydraulic conduc-

tivity (saturated hydraulic conductivity); n, m(=1-1/n), and 𝛼[kPa-1] and λ(=0.5)are empirical

parameters. The definition of the functions for the two branches (subscript d for drying and w

for wetting) entails the assessment of 5x2 parameters. However, the LP approach requires two

simplifying assumptions: 𝜃𝑟 = 𝜃𝑟𝑑 = 𝜃𝑟

𝑤 and 𝑛 = 𝑛𝑑 = 𝑛𝑤. Furthermore, it prevents the non-

closure of moisture retention scanning loops in simulations of cyclic paths (artificial pumping

errors, APE), and permits considering the air entrapment effects employing the algorithm pro-

posed by Land (1968) also in terms of differences in relative permeability.

In this work, the approach has been calibrated and validated for a pyroclastic soil (Table 1), a

silty sand part of stratigraphic series found on Monteforte Irpino (Avellino Province, Campania

Region) relieves and deeply investigated through laboratory tests (Nicotera et al., 2010) and

field monitoring by Pirone et al. (2015). The main drying curve (𝜃𝑟 , 𝑛, 𝜃𝑠𝑑 , 𝛼𝑑) is obtained from

ku-pF apparatus while the remaining parameters are estimated through an inverse analysis

(Hopmans et al., 2002) carried out using suction and volumetric water content measurements

collected during an entire hydrological year through the physical model developed by Rianna

et al. (2014).

In Figure 1a, the values, observed and returned after calibration and the related estimated main

wetting curve are reported. The matching appears quite satisfying on the entire range. Never-

theless, also for validation periods (Figure 1b-c), the paths are recognized well reproduced by

the LP approach. The parameters are listed in Table 1.

Fig. 1 Experimental (grey) and findings (black) returned on calibration hydrological year period 2010-2011(a)

and validation: 2011-2012 (b); 2012-2013 (c). Main drying (red) and wetting (blue) curves are also re-

ported

Tab. 1 Main soil parameters for investigated pyroclastic soil

Field average thickness 0.6m 𝛼𝑤/𝛼𝑑 0.07/0.1 (kPa-1)

Field porosity 0.7 𝜃𝑠𝑤/𝜃𝑠

𝑑 0.69/0.63

Gs 2.57 𝜃𝑟 0.26

n 1.9 𝑘𝑠 1e-6 m/s

(a) (b) (c)

M a y 2 4 – 2 6 , 2 0 1 7 , B a r c e l o n a , S p a i n

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding Page3

3. RESULTS

The evaluation on the effects of accounting (or not) hysteretic dynamics for landslide triggering

in pyroclastic soils is carried out investigating how they can impact the prediction of pore water

pressures, on short time scale, under the effect of heavy rainfall events (potential triggering

event) and on longer time scales (seasonal) to provide a frame of differences in terms of poten-

tial antecedent conditions.

In this perspective, several sets of numerical analysis have been carried out in Hydrus 1D code

(Simunek et al.,2005) on a homogeneous soil column 2m long. At the bottom, a capillary barrier

condition is used (consistently with field conditions usually retrieved on field) while at the

ground surface soil atmosphere dynamics are reproduced following the Feddes et al. (1974)

approach. By way of example, the results concerning the application at ground surface of a

constant ingoing flux equal to saturated permeability are displayed. Four different SWCC sand

related permeability functions are considered: i) hysteretic, taking into account (HAE) or not

(H) air entrapment; ii) non-hysteretic main drying (D);iii) non-hysteretic mean curve (M). In

this perspective, it is worth noting that, if air entrapment is taken into account, the van Genuch-

ten parameters regulating a hypothetical “non-hysteretic” wetting curve cannot be analytically

retrieved.

Fig. 2 suction-water content paths leading to a zero suction value (first column), the time required to attain

such conditions (second column), the difference between final and initial water content (third column) and geo-

metric average between initial and final hydraulic conductivity (fourth column). The three rows refer to three

different initial conditions, respectively 10, 20 and 30 kPa at 1.5 m depth

Three initial hydrostatic conditions are assumed with water table respectively posed at 2.5, 3.5

and 4.5 m below the ground surface. A reference depth of 1.5m is considered. For HAE and H,

the paths start from point located on main drying curve. For the lower initial suction value

(10kPa at 1.5m), HAE approach permits firstly reaching the zero suction condition (slightly

M a y 2 4 – 2 6 , 2 0 1 7 , B a r c e l o n a , S p a i n

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding

JTC1 Workshop on Advances in Landslide Understanding Page4

more than 2 days), after drying and mean curve, finally hysteretic not considering air entrap-

ment approach (H) require longer times to attain the condition (about 3.5 days). The behavior

appears mainly regulated by the required variation in volumetric water content (from about 0.04

for HAE to 0.12 for M); indeed, according to the assumptions, D, H and M are required to attain

𝜃𝑠𝑑while HAE reaches an intermediate water content value (about 0.65). Such dynamics signif-

icantly change for higher initial suction values. Indeed, for both 20 and 30 kPa, the D and H

paths reach the target suction with a substantial advance respect to the other ones. However, in

these cases, the higher mean values of hydraulic conductivity (more than ∆𝜃) regulate the pro-

cesses: therefore, for D and H, around twice values are retrievable.

4. CONCLUSIONS

Under the availability of field and laboratory data, a framework to calibrate and validate the

widely adopted approach proposed by Parker and Lenhard (1987) is provided. The results, for

a typical pyroclastic soil present on Campanian slopes (South Italy), are then employed to assess

how the different approaches for estimating soil hydraulic behavior could influence the predic-

tion of pore water pressures under persistent rainfall histories, recognized in wet season as trig-

ger for slope instability phenomena. An example clearly displays how arisen differences could

be particularly significant and they should be considered, for example, in developing predictive

approaches for early warning systems.

REFERENCES

Feddes RA, Bresler E, Neuman SP (1974) Field test of a modified numerical model for water uptake by root sys-

tems. Water Resources Research 10(6): 1199-1206.

Haines WB (1930) Studies in the physical properties of soil. V. The hysteresis effect in capillary properties, and

the modes of moisture distribution associated therewith. The Journal of Agricultural Science 20(1), 97-116.

Hopmans, JW, Šimůnek J, Romano N, Durner W (2002) Inverse Modeling of Transient Water Flow. Methods of

Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical Methods, Chapter 3.6.2. J. H. Dane and G. C. Topp (eds.). SSSA, Madison,

WI, pp. 963-1008.

Iwata S, Tabuchi T, Warkentin B P (1995) Soil-water interactions. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Land CS (1968) Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow From Rock

Properties. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 8(2):149-156.

Lenhard, R J; Parker JC (1987b). A Model for Hysteretic Constitutive Relations Governing Multiphase Flow 2.

Permeability-Saturation Relations. Water Resources Research 23(12):2197-2206.

Likos WJ, Lu N, Godt JW (2014) Hysteresis and Uncertainty in Soil Water-Retention Curve Parameters. Journal

of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 140(4).

Nicotera MV, Papa R, Urciuoli G (2010) An experimental technique for determining the hydraulic propertiesof

unsaturated pyroclastic soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal 33(4), 263-285.

Pagano L, Picarelli L, Rianna G & Urciuoli G (2010) A simplified approach for timely prediction of

precipitation-induced landslides in unsaturated pyroclastic soils. Landslides 7(3), 273-289.

Parker JC, Lenhard RJ (1987a). A Model for Hysteretic Constitutive Relations Governing Multiphase Flow 1.

Saturation-Pressure Relations. Water Resources Research 23(12):2187-2196.

Pirone M, Papa R, Nicotera MV, Urciuoli G (2015) In situ monitoring of the groundwater field in an unsaturated

pyroclastic slope for slope stability evaluation. Landslides 12(2), 259-276 .

Rianna G, Pagano L& Urciuoli G (2014) Investigation of soil-atmosphere interaction in pyroclastic soils.

Journal of Hydrology 510, 480-492.

Simunek J, van Genuchten MT, Sejna M (2005) The HYDRUS-1D Software Package for Simulating the

Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably Saturated Media, Version 3.0, HYDRUS

Software Series 1, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside,

California, USA, 270 pp.

van Genuchten MT(1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.

Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892–898.