hydraulic testing and data report for six- inch triton filter...

77
HYDRAULIC TESTING AND DATA REPORT FOR SIX- INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS Prepared for Tensar International Corporation Colorado State University Daryl B. Simons Building at the Engineering Research Center Fort Collins, Colorado

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • HYDRAULIC TESTING AND DATA REPORT FOR SIX-

    INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS

    Prepared for

    Tensar International Corporation

    Colorado State University

    Daryl B. Simons Building at the

    Engineering Research Center

    Fort Collins, Colorado

  • HYDRAULIC TESTING AND DATA REPORT FOR SIX-

    INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS

    Prepared for

    Tensar International Corporation

    Prepared by

    Christopher I. Thornton

    Amanda L. Cox

    Michael D. Turner

    June 2009

    Colorado State University

    Daryl B. Simons Building at the

    Engineering Research Center

    Fort Collins, Colorado

  • i

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................i

    LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ iii

    LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................v

    LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................vi

    1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1

    2 TEST PROGRAM ..............................................................................................................2

    2.1 Test Facility ...................................................................................................................2

    2.2 Product...........................................................................................................................4

    2.3 Embankment Construction .............................................................................................5

    2.4 Filter Design and Installation..........................................................................................7

    2.5 Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress Construction...................................................................8

    2.6 Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress Installation .....................................................................9

    2.7 Test Procedure .............................................................................................................13

    3 TEST MATRIX AND DATABASE .................................................................................15

    3.1 One-foot Overtopping Test...........................................................................................15

    3.2 Two-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................20

    3.3 Three-foot Overtopping Test ........................................................................................22

    3.4 Four-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................24

    3.5 Five-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................27

    3.6 Post-testing Evaluation.................................................................................................29

    4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS ...............................................................................................30

    4.1 Four-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................31

    4.2 Five-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................33

    5 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................37

    REFERENCES........................................................................................................................38

    APPENDIX A SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES ..............................................................39

    APPENDIX B COMPACTION VERIFICATION .............................................................41

    APPENDIX C FILTER MATERIAL GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS ..........................43

  • ii

    APPENDIX D PRODUCT INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS...................................46

    APPENDIX E GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR STONE INFILL.............................53

    APPENDIX F FILTER FABRIC PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS...................................55

    APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS DATA..............................................................57

  • iii

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Figure 1-1. Photograph of the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress.....................................................1

    Figure 2-1. The Engineering Research Center at CSU and Horsetooth Reservoir.......................3

    Figure 2-2. Profile View Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility set at 2:1 Slope ...........................4

    Figure 2-3. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattresses ...............................................................................5

    Figure 2-4. Compacted Embankment before Installation of Six-inch Triton Filter

    Mattress...................................................................................................................6

    Figure 2-5. Profile View of Granular Filter and Embankment Toe Detail ....................................7

    Figure 2-6. Triton Mattress Baffles and Two-by-Six Frames .......................................................8

    Figure 2-7. Completed Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress prior to Installation..................................9

    Figure 2-8. Mirafi 180N over Compacted Embankment ...........................................................10

    Figure 2-9. Crane-installation of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress...............................................11

    Figure 2-10. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress following Crane-installation .................................11

    Figure 2-11. Cross-sectional View of Sidewall Detail...............................................................12

    Figure 2-12. Photograph of Toe Wall and Toe Plate .................................................................13

    Figure 3-1. Photograph of Installed Revetment System prior to Testing....................................16

    Figure 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test in Progress ..................................................................18

    Figure 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test in Progress..................................................................20

    Figure 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test in Progress................................................................22

    Figure 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test in Progress..................................................................24

    Figure 3-6. Five-foot Overtopping Test in Progress ..................................................................27

    Figure 3-7. Embankment following Revetment System Removal .............................................29

    Figure 4-1. Manning’s n verses Unit Discharge for Three-, Four-, and Five-foot

    Overtopping Tests of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress .............................................30

    Figure 4-2. Four-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model

    Flow Depth Data ...................................................................................................32

    Figure 4-3. Four-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.040..................32

    Figure 4-4. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Four-foot Overtopping Test.............33

    Figure 4-5. Five-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model Flow

    Depth Data ............................................................................................................34

    Figure 4-6. Five-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.038 ..................35

    Figure 4-7. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Five-foot Overtopping Test .............36

    Figure A-1. Sub-grade Grain Size Distribution.........................................................................40

    Figure B-1. Compaction Verification for Soil Embankment ......................................................42

    Figure C-1. Pea Gravel Filter Material Grain-size Distribution Curve.......................................44

    Figure C-2. Angular Rock Grain-size Distribution Curve .........................................................45

  • iv

    Figure D-1. Product Construction and Installation Instructions ..................................................48

    Figure E-1. Grain-size Distribution for Stone Infill....................................................................54

    Figure F-1. Product Data Sheet for Mirafi 180N........................................................................56

  • v

    LIST OF TABLES

    Table 3-1. Test Matrix for the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress ..................................................15

    Table 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data .............................................................19

    Table 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data.............................................................21

    Table 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data...........................................................23

    Table 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data ............................................................26

    Table 3.6. Five-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data .............................................................28

    Table 4-1. Summary Hydraulics for Overtopping Test Series ....................................................31

    Table G-1. Four-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress

    Analysis ................................................................................................................58

    Table G-2. Five-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress

    Analysis ................................................................................................................63

  • vi

    LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS

    Symbol

    D0 grain size that 0% of the particles are finer than

    D50 grain size that 50% of the particles are finer than

    D100 grain size that 100% of the particles are finer than

    EGL energy grade line

    n Manning’s coefficient of hydraulic resistance

    Abbreviations

    % percent

    ± plus or minus

    ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

    avg average

    cfs cubic feet per second

    CSU Colorado State University

    ERC Engineering Research Center

    ft foot or feet

    ft/ft foot per foot

    ft/s feet per second

    H:V Horizontal:Vertical

    hr(s) hour(s)

    ID identification

    in. inch(es)

    lb pound(s)

    lb/ft3 pounds per cubic foot

    mm/dd/yy month/day/year

    pcf pounds per cubic foot

    PI Plasticity Index

    psf pounds per square foot

    psi pounds per square inch

    SGOF Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility

  • 1

    1 INTRODUCTION

    During the fall of 2008, hydraulic performance testing was conducted by Colorado State

    University (CSU) on one six-inch Triton Filter Mattress manufactured by Tensar International

    Corporation. Testing was performed at the Hydraulics Laboratory at the Engineering Research

    Center. The Triton Filter Mattress was constructed and installed according to specifications

    provided by Tensar International Corporation. A total of five tests were conducted under the test

    program. Figure 1-1 presents a photograph of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress during the

    installation process. Information presented within this report documents the construction and

    testing processes, and also provides data from hydraulic testing of a full-scale revetment system

    under controlled laboratory conditions for the purpose of identifying stability threshold

    conditions. Descriptions of the test program, test matrix, database, and test summary are

    presented in this report.

    Figure 1-1. Photograph of the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress

  • 2

    2 TEST PROGRAM

    2.1 TEST FACILITY

    Laboratory testing of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was performed at the Hydraulics

    Laboratory located at the Engineering Research Center (ERC) at CSU. Colorado State

    University’s ERC is comprised of laboratories and offices encompassing virtually all engineering

    disciplines. Within the ERC, the Hydraulics Division (a subdivision of the Civil and

    Environmental Engineering Department) operates the Hydraulics Laboratory.

    Water supply to both outdoor and indoor research facilities is furnished by Horsetooth

    Reservoir, which is adjacent to the ERC as presented in Figure 2-1. Flow is conveyed through

    an existing pipe network to each facility. Outdoor facilities are gravity fed from Horsetooth

    Reservoir with a capacity of approximately 170,000 acre-feet of water and a maximum, static

    pressure of approximately 110 pounds per square inch (psi) at the ERC pipe network. Each

    outdoor facility has its own independent water delivery system.

  • 3

    Figure 2-1. The Engineering Research Center at CSU and Horsetooth Reservoir

    For this testing program, an overtopping test facility was utilized, which was 4 ft wide by

    40 ft long and with a 2H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) slope. The head-box configuration in this

    flume allowed for a maximum of 6 ft of overtopping depth. Figure 2-2 presents a profile

    drawing of the Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility (SGOF) utilized for the testing program.

    Horsetooth

    Reservoir

    College Lake

    ERC

    Outdoor Facilities

  • 4

    Figure 2-2. Profile View Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility set at 2:1 Slope

    2.2 PRODUCT

    The six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was tested under controlled conditions to provide data

    consistent with the current state-of-the-practice in calculating hydraulic performance thresholds.

    Three sections of geogrid baffles four-feet in width were provided by Tensar International

    Corporation, which consisted of lengths of two twenty-foot sections and an eleven-foot section.

    The baffle sections were filled with angular stone, and the finished six-inch Triton Filter

    Mattress was tested under the duress of an overtopping test protocol. A photograph of the six-

    inch Triton Filter Mattresses is presented as Figure 2-3.

    Not To Scale

    12-in.

    2

    1

    40-ft

    12-in. Soil

    10-ft Toe Plate

    and Cap

    Six-inch Triton Filter

    Mattress

    Flow Straightener

    Five-foot

    Granular Filter

  • 5

    Figure 2-3. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattresses

    2.3 EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION

    The testing program included construction of an earthen embankment section compacted

    between vertical walls of an outdoor flume. To prevent subgrade edge effects from

    compromising the integrity of the embankment, channel iron was installed along the walls of the

    flume. Soil was placed within the head and toe walls of the test section, and compacted in two

    equal lifts of six inches. Soil consisted of a clayey sand with a Plasticity Index (PI) of 10. The

    test section was constructed to a height where the finished soil embankment surface was 1 ft

    above the floor of the testing facility. Embankment geometry incorporated a horizontal 10 ft

    long crest section, and a specified slope length of 40 ft at a angle of 2H:1V. Figure 2-4 presents

    a photograph of the compacted soil embankment prior to installation of the six-inch Triton Filter

    Mattress.

  • 6

    Figure 2-4. Compacted Embankment before Installation of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress

    Soil information determined and documented during embankment construction included

    the following:

    • Soil Texture (ASTM D2487 classification);

    • Grain size distribution curve (ASTM D422); and

    • Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318).

    All of the documented physical properties of the soil are located in Appendix A.

    Soil moisture content and in-situ dry unit weight were determined by nuclear density

    gage along the centerline of the embankment as determined by Terracon, Inc. (ASTM D2922 and

    D3017) Three locations on the compacted soil embankment were evaluated for their in-situ

    moisture content and dry unit weight. From the crest of the test section, these locations were

    approximately 10 ft apart. The in-situ moisture contents for these locations were 8.7, 7.8, and

  • 7

    7.6 percent by volume and the corresponding compaction percentages were 93, 92, and 90

    percent. The Field Density Test Report verifying compaction is located in Appendix B.

    2.4 FILTER DESIGN AND INSTALLATION

    To reduce the pore pressure created at the downstream end of the embankment, a filter

    was designed according to current industry standards and installed just upstream of the porous

    toe wall, extending 5 ft upstream. The filter was constructed using angular rock with a D50 of 26

    mm, pea gravel with a D50 of 5.7 mm, and sand with a D50 of 0.70 mm. Grain size distribution

    curves for the filter material are provided in Appendix C. The filter was installed using the

    angular rock extending 2.5 ft upstream of the toe plate with a 2:1 pea gravel to sand mixture

    extending the remaining 2.5 ft, creating a total filter thickness of 5 ft. The division between the

    soil embankment and granular filter was further established with the placement of a Mirafi 180N

    barrier. In addition, a ¼-inch perforated steel plate was placed between the filter mattress and

    granular filter. Figure 2-5 presents a schematic of the granular filter layer described above.

    Figure 2-5. Profile View of Granular Filter and Embankment Toe Detail

    Toe Plate and

    End Cap

    12 in.

    2.5 ft

    2.5 ft

    Mirafi®

    180N

    Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress

    Soil

    2:1 Pea

    Gravel:Sand

    Angular Rock

    NOT TO SCALE

    Perforated

    Steel Plate

  • 8

    2.5 SIX-INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS CONSTRUCTION

    Construction of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattresses was reflective of standard

    procedures provided by Tensar International. The installation instructions are presented in

    Appendix D. The geogrid sections were laid flat on the ground, and all vertical seams of the mat

    were tied with standard half-hitch knots. Subsequently, two-by-six inch frames were constructed

    and placed in alternating baffle sections to add vertical rigidity for the placement of stone infill.

    The seamed mat and frames can be seen in Figure 2-6.

    Figure 2-6. Triton Mattress Baffles and Two-by-Six Frames

    Following the frame installation, angular stone with a D0 of 1.50 inches, D50 of 2.25

    inches, and D100 of 3.00 inches was placed in the baffles. A grain size distribution for the stone

    installed into the baffles is presented in Appendix E. Stone was placed in the baffles such that

    the stone fill level was slightly above the upper vertical edge of the mattress. The top of the

    mattress was then sealed with the stitch configuration provided in the manufacturer’s

    instructions. The six-inch Triton Filter Mattress following construction can be seen in Figure

    2-7.

  • 9

    Figure 2-7. Completed Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress prior to Installation

    2.6 SIX-INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS INSTALLATION

    Installation was reflective of standard procedures for revetment systems for hydraulic

    stability and accommodated a four foot width of the filter mattress. Mirafi®

    180N non-woven

    geotextile fabric was placed on the compacted embankment. The product data sheet for Mirafi

    180N is presented in Appendix F. The geotextile fabric was placed over the embankment and

    forced to follow the contour over the transition between the horizontal approach and 2H:1V test

    sections. At the crest of the slope, a V-notch was cut into the fabric and sealed using silicone

    adhesive. Also, all joints between the geotextile and facility were sealed with silicone adhesive.

    The embankment with the geotextile installed is presented as Figure 2-8.

  • 10

    Figure 2-8. Mirafi 180N over Compacted Embankment

    Subsequently, the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was craned onto the embankment per

    the instructions provided by Tensar International. The mattress sections were then sewn to one

    another with the stitch configuration provided in the assembly instructions. Figure 2-9 presents a

    photograph of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress while being craned into the facility and, Figure

    2-10 presents a photograph of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress after crane-installation.

  • 11

    Figure 2-9. Crane-installation of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress

    Figure 2-10. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress following Crane-installation

  • 12

    Following standard installation procedures for revetment system testing, potential for

    artificially induced scour along the sidewalls was prevented by placing foam wadding along the

    one-half inch voids of the revetment system. The edges were then covered with angle iron as

    presented in Figure 2-11, which provides a cross-sectional diagram of the test section.

    Figure 2-11. Cross-sectional View of Sidewall Detail

    The edge treatment prevented water from flowing unobstructed down the edges of the

    flume. Flashing was secured to the flume walls and sealed to terminate the filter fabric, ensure

    the filter mattress could not be completely removed from the flume, and to restrain the foam

    edge treatment. Horizontal projection of the side protection extended five inches into the flume.

    The filter was secured at the embankment toe by means of a steel plate which prevented vertical

    displacement of the filter mattress, but allowed for expansion of the mattress in the downstream

    direction. A photograph of this toe plate is presented in Figure 2-12.

    Soil

    Flume Wall

    Silicone Seal

    Flashing

    Securing Bolt

    Foam Wadding

    Six-inch

    Triton Filter

    Mattress

    Channel

    Iron Mirafi 180N

    Not to Scale

  • 13

    Figure 2-12. Photograph of Toe Wall and Toe Plate

    2.7 TEST PROCEDURE

    A test consisted of a continuous 4-hr flow over the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress at a

    uniform discharge. The performance threshold for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress tested

    within this test program was defined as the point at which deformation, soil loss, or loss of

    intimate contact with the embankment sub-grade occurred. Provided that the revetment system

    successfully endured the 4-hr flow without exceeding the defined performance threshold, the

    procedure was repeated at the next higher target discharge or until the flow capacity of the

    testing facility was reached. Typically, target discharges corresponded to predetermined

    overtopping depths above the embankment crest elevation (e.g., 1 ft, 2 ft, etc.), although any

    discharge could be conveyed through the system provided proper measurement and reporting

    procedures were followed. Hourly data collection was maintained for the entire 4 hr test

    duration, unless the performance threshold was exceeded.

  • 14

    Hourly measurements of water-surface elevations were made at 4 ft intervals (stations)

    along the centerline of the embankment during each test. Bed elevations (top of revetment

    surface) were established prior to and after the termination of each test at the same measurement

    stations as the water-surface readings. Locations on the revetment system were identified with a

    mark on the wall to ensure consistency in measurement. Flow and elevation measurements were

    made to the nearest 0.01 ft using a point gage and survey level.

    Discharge was determined independently of the measurements made within the test

    section. Determination of the discharge was made using an in-line sonic flow meter located in

    the inflow pipe. The in-line sonic flow meter was accurate to ±3%.

  • 15

    3 TEST MATRIX AND DATABASE

    A test matrix was developed to summarize and present the details of the testing program.

    Table 3-1 presents the test matrix which includes five tests with overtopping depths of 1-ft

    through 5-ft. The 5-ft overtopping test was conducted until intimate contact was lost between the

    Triton Filter Mattress and soil embankment. Each test was conducted on the 2H:1V

    embankment slope. After completion of the tests outlined in Table 3.1, the collected data were

    entered into a database for analysis. The following sections briefly describe conditions during

    testing with photographic documentation, and provide the supporting database.

    Table 3-1. Test Matrix for the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress

    Test ID

    Test Date

    (mm/dd/yy)

    Embankment Slope (H:V)

    Overtopping Depth

    (ft)

    Measured Discharge

    (cfs)

    Test Duration

    (hrs)

    one-foot 11/20/2008 2:1 1.0 11.0 4.0

    two-foot 11/20/2008 2:1 2.0 28.0 4.0

    three-foot 11/21/2008 2:1 3.0 50.0 4.0

    four-foot 11/21/2008 2:1 4.0 78.0 4.0

    five-foot 11/24/2008 2:1 5.0 109.0 2.0

    3.1 ONE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST

    Testing of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress initiated on November 20th

    , 2008. The

    system was installed as per standard protocol described in Sections 2.3 through 2.6 utilizing a

    slope length of 40 ft and a total embankment length including the horizontal approach section of

    50 ft. Figure 3.1 is a photograph of the completed installation prior to testing. The system was

    surveyed, and photographed to prepare for testing.

  • 16

    Figure 3-1. Photograph of Installed Revetment System prior to Testing

  • 17

    Testing commenced with a discharge intended to “season” the embankment by allowing

    the system to become saturated. After the system was seasoned, the discharge was increased

    until the water level in the headbox was one foot above the embankment. The discharge

    recorded for the one-foot overtopping test was 11 cfs. Initially, data were collected at the pre-

    established stations, and subsequently at the start of every hour for the remainder of the test. The

    test was allowed to proceed for the full 4 hrs as described in Section 2.7, with data collection at

    the start of each hour. In addition, aerated water was observed beginning approximately 4 ft

    downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test section. Therefore,

    depth measurements beyond Station 4 should be considered approximate.

    At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and post-test bed

    elevation readings were recorded, indicating that there had not been any deformation of the

    system or loss of intimate contact with either the subgrade embankment or granular drainage

    layer. Figure 3-2 is a photograph of the one-foot overtopping test in progress. Table 3-2

    presents the one-foot overtopping test data.

  • 18

    Figure 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test in Progress

  • 19

    Table 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data

    Tape

    Station

    (ft)

    Horizontal

    Station

    (ft)

    Position

    ID

    Pre-test

    Bed

    Reading

    (ft)

    Point-

    gage

    Survey

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Bed

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 1

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 2

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 3

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 4

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Average

    Reading

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Depth

    (ft)

    Vertical

    Depth

    (ft)

    Continuity

    Velocity

    (ft/s)

    EGL

    (Continuity)

    (ft)

    3.65 3.28 Center 17.24 99.92 82.68 17.00 16.95 16.92 16.91 16.95 82.98 0.30 0.33 9.32 84.29

    5.65 5.07 Center 17.15 99.03 81.88 16.94 16.92 16.91 16.92 16.92 82.11 0.23 0.25 12.09 84.35

    7.65 6.87 Center 17.24 98.16 80.92 17.03 17.01 16.97 16.98 17.00 81.16 0.24 0.27 11.34 83.13

    9.65 8.66 Center 17.18 97.26 80.08 16.99 16.97 16.95 16.95 16.97 80.30 0.22 0.24 12.79 82.81

    11.65 10.46 Center 17.11 96.38 79.27 16.86 16.86 16.88 16.84 16.86 79.52 0.25 0.28 11.00 81.37

    13.65 12.25 Center 17.27 95.50 78.23 16.90 16.91 16.94 16.83 16.90 78.61 0.38 0.42 7.33 79.40

    15.65 14.05 Center 17.21 94.60 77.39 17.00 17.04 17.00 17.00 17.01 77.59 0.20 0.22 13.75 80.51

    17.65 15.84 Center 17.14 93.73 76.59 17.03 16.96 16.96 16.93 16.97 76.76 0.17 0.19 16.18 80.81

    19.65 17.64 Center 17.22 92.86 75.64 16.90 16.92 16.89 16.88 16.90 75.96 0.32 0.36 8.53 77.06

    21.65 19.43 Center 17.24 92.02 74.78 16.93 16.98 16.90 16.93 16.93 75.09 0.31 0.34 8.98 76.31

    23.65 21.23 Center 17.04 91.09 74.05 16.87 16.88 16.89 16.86 16.88 74.22 0.16 0.18 16.67 78.51

    25.65 23.02 Center 17.15 90.20 73.05 16.77 16.80 16.78 16.75 16.78 73.43 0.38 0.42 7.33 74.22

    27.65 24.82 Center 17.06 89.35 72.29 16.81 16.83 16.84 16.81 16.82 72.53 0.24 0.26 11.58 74.59

    29.65 26.61 Center 17.26 88.46 71.20 16.90 16.93 16.91 16.89 16.91 71.55 0.35 0.39 7.80 72.46

    31.65 28.41 Center 17.29 87.57 70.28 16.97 17.05 17.02 16.99 17.01 70.56 0.28 0.31 9.73 72.00

    33.65 30.20 Center 17.19 86.69 69.50 16.93 16.96 16.93 16.95 16.94 69.75 0.25 0.28 11.11 71.64

    35.65 32.00 Center 17.32 85.80 68.48 16.96 16.98 16.93 16.94 16.95 68.85 0.37 0.41 7.48 69.68

    37.65 33.79 Center 17.21 84.90 67.69 16.92 16.95 16.95 16.94 16.94 67.96 0.27 0.30 10.19 69.54

  • 20

    3.2 TWO-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST

    Upon conclusion of the one-foot overtopping test of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress,

    there was no observable contact loss or deformation. The two-foot overtopping test initiated on

    November 20th

    , 2008. Flow over the system was increased gradually to the two-foot overtopping

    depth, achieved at 28 cfs. Figure 3-3 is a photograph of the two-foot test in progress.

    Figure 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test in Progress

    Initially, data were collected at the pre-established stations, and subsequently at the start

    of every hour for the remainder of the test. Aerated water was observed beginning

    approximately 10 ft downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test

    section. Therefore, depth measurements beyond Station 10 should be considered approximate.

    The test was conducted for the full 4 hrs as there was no observable system deformation during

    the overtopping test. At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and

    post-test bed elevations were recorded, confirming that the system had not exceeded the

    performance threshold. Table 3-3 presents the two-foot overtopping test data.

  • 21

    Table 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data

    Tape

    Station

    (ft)

    Horizontal

    Station

    (ft)

    Position

    ID

    Pre-test

    Bed

    Reading

    (ft)

    Point-

    gage

    Survey

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Bed

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 1

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 2

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 3

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 4

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Average

    Reading

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Depth

    (ft)

    Vertical

    Depth

    (ft)

    Continuity

    Velocity

    (ft/s)

    EGL

    (Continuity)

    (ft)

    3.65 3.28 Center 17.23 99.92 82.69 16.63 16.63 16.63 16.63 16.63 83.29 0.60 0.67 11.67 85.34

    5.65 5.07 Center 17.14 99.03 81.89 16.67 16.66 16.67 16.67 16.67 82.36 0.47 0.53 14.81 85.72

    7.65 6.87 Center 17.23 98.16 80.93 16.79 16.79 16.78 16.80 16.79 81.37 0.44 0.49 15.91 85.26

    9.65 8.66 Center 17.18 97.26 80.08 16.76 16.74 16.75 16.75 16.75 80.51 0.43 0.48 16.28 84.58

    11.65 10.46 Center 17.10 96.38 79.28 16.65 16.66 16.64 16.65 16.65 79.73 0.45 0.50 15.56 83.44

    13.65 12.25 Center 17.27 95.50 78.23 16.66 16.70 16.67 16.63 16.67 78.84 0.61 0.67 11.57 80.85

    15.65 14.05 Center 17.18 94.60 77.42 16.73 16.76 16.71 16.72 16.73 77.87 0.45 0.50 15.56 81.58

    17.65 15.84 Center 17.11 93.73 76.62 16.75 16.75 16.70 16.74 16.74 77.00 0.38 0.42 18.67 82.37

    19.65 17.64 Center 17.21 92.86 75.65 16.69 16.69 16.66 16.69 16.68 76.18 0.53 0.59 13.27 78.86

    21.65 19.43 Center 17.21 92.02 74.81 16.70 16.72 16.63 16.70 16.69 75.33 0.52 0.58 13.40 78.07

    23.65 21.23 Center 17.03 91.09 74.06 16.68 16.70 16.66 16.67 16.68 74.41 0.35 0.39 19.86 80.50

    25.65 23.02 Center 17.16 90.20 73.04 16.57 16.60 16.61 16.57 16.59 73.61 0.57 0.64 12.23 75.88

    27.65 24.82 Center 17.04 89.35 72.31 16.63 16.57 16.59 16.50 16.57 72.78 0.47 0.52 14.97 76.21

    29.65 26.61 Center 17.25 88.46 71.21 16.68 16.59 16.62 16.61 16.63 71.84 0.63 0.70 11.20 73.72

    31.65 28.41 Center 17.26 87.57 70.31 16.71 16.75 16.74 16.71 16.73 70.84 0.53 0.59 13.15 73.47

    33.65 30.20 Center 17.16 86.69 69.53 16.74 16.77 16.74 16.72 16.74 69.95 0.42 0.47 16.77 74.27

    35.65 32.00 Center 17.30 85.80 68.50 16.69 16.68 16.70 16.67 16.69 69.12 0.61 0.69 11.38 71.06

    37.65 33.79 Center 17.20 84.90 67.70 16.65 16.67 16.66 16.64 16.66 68.25 0.55 0.61 12.84 70.75

  • 22

    3.3 THREE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST

    Upon conclusion of the two-foot overtopping test, there was no observable contact loss or

    deformation. The three-foot overtopping test initiated on November 21st, 2008. The system was

    initially seasoned at a low flow rate. Subsequently, the flow over the system was increased

    gradually to the three-foot overtopping depth, achieved at 50 cfs. Figure 3-4 is a photograph of

    the three-foot overtopping test in progress.

    Figure 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test in Progress

    Initially, data were collected at the pre-established stations, and subsequently at the start

    of every hour for the remainder of the test. Aerated water was observed beginning

    approximately 20 ft downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test

    section. Therefore, depth measurements beyond Station 20 should be considered approximate.

    The test was conducted for the full 4 hrs as there was no observable system deformation during

    the overtopping test. At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and

    post-test bed elevations were recorded, confirming that the system had not exceeded the

    performance threshold. Table 3-4 presents the three-foot overtopping test data.

  • 23

    Table 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data

    Tape

    Station

    (ft)

    Horizontal

    Station

    (ft)

    Position

    ID

    Pre-test

    Bed

    Reading

    (ft)

    Point-

    gage

    Survey

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Bed

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 1

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 2

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 3

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 4

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Average

    Reading

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Depth

    (ft)

    Vertical

    Depth

    (ft)

    Continuity

    Velocity

    (ft/s)

    EGL

    (Continuity)

    (ft)

    3.65 3.28 Center 17.22 99.92 82.70 16.30 16.30 16.30 16.29 16.30 83.62 0.92 1.03 13.55 86.38

    5.65 5.07 Center 17.16 99.03 81.87 16.38 16.44 16.43 16.38 16.41 82.62 0.75 0.84 16.61 86.83

    7.65 6.87 Center 17.24 98.16 80.92 16.50 16.57 16.55 16.49 16.53 81.63 0.71 0.79 17.54 86.34

    9.65 8.66 Center 17.16 97.26 80.10 16.53 16.56 16.53 16.50 16.53 80.73 0.63 0.70 19.84 86.78

    11.65 10.46 Center 17.09 96.38 79.29 16.45 16.47 16.47 16.46 16.46 79.92 0.63 0.70 19.92 86.01

    13.65 12.25 Center 17.24 95.50 78.26 16.44 16.49 16.51 16.46 16.48 79.03 0.77 0.85 16.34 83.09

    15.65 14.05 Center 17.16 94.60 77.44 16.50 16.56 16.54 16.53 16.53 78.07 0.63 0.70 19.92 84.16

    17.65 15.84 Center 17.14 93.73 76.59 16.47 16.54 16.54 16.51 16.52 77.22 0.63 0.70 20.00 83.36

    19.65 17.64 Center 17.18 92.86 75.68 16.38 16.49 16.47 16.48 16.46 76.41 0.72 0.81 17.24 80.95

    21.65 19.43 Center 17.21 92.02 74.81 16.37 16.47 16.48 16.49 16.45 75.57 0.76 0.84 16.50 79.72

    23.65 21.23 Center 17.03 91.09 74.06 16.40 16.46 16.45 16.45 16.44 74.65 0.59 0.66 21.19 81.56

    25.65 23.02 Center 17.09 90.20 73.11 16.20 16.37 16.35 16.36 16.32 73.88 0.77 0.86 16.23 77.89

    27.65 24.82 Center 17.04 89.35 72.31 16.13 16.30 16.32 16.33 16.27 73.08 0.77 0.86 16.23 77.09

    29.65 26.61 Center 17.24 88.46 71.22 16.15 16.25 16.30 16.31 16.25 72.21 0.99 1.10 12.66 74.59

    31.65 28.41 Center 17.24 87.57 70.33 16.16 16.37 16.37 16.37 16.32 71.25 0.92 1.03 13.55 74.01

    33.65 30.20 Center 17.15 86.69 69.54 16.21 16.46 16.48 16.45 16.40 70.29 0.75 0.84 16.67 74.53

    35.65 32.00 Center 17.28 85.80 68.52 16.28 16.44 16.40 16.41 16.38 69.42 0.90 1.00 13.93 72.34

    37.65 33.79 Center 17.17 84.90 67.73 16.27 16.38 16.38 16.38 16.35 68.55 0.82 0.91 15.29 72.09

  • 24

    3.4 FOUR-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST

    Upon conclusion of the three-foot overtopping test, there was no observable contact loss

    or deformation. The four-foot overtopping test initiated on November 21st, 2008. The system

    was initially seasoned at a low flow rate. Subsequently, the flow over the system was increased

    gradually to the four-foot overtopping depth, achieved at 78 cfs. Figure 3-5 is a photograph of

    the four-foot overtopping test in progress.

    Figure 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test in Progress

  • 25

    Initially, data were collected at the pre-established stations, and subsequently at the start

    of every hour for the remainder of the test. Aerated water was observed beginning

    approximately 26 ft downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test

    section. Therefore, depth measurements beyond Station 26 should be considered approximate.

    The test was conducted for the full 4 hrs as there was no observable system deformation during

    the overtopping test. At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and

    post-test bed elevations were recorded, confirming that the system had not exceeded the

    performance threshold. Table 3-5 presents the four-foot overtopping test data.

  • 26

    Table 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data

    Tape

    Station

    (ft)

    Horizontal

    Station

    (ft)

    Position

    ID

    Pre-test

    Bed

    Reading

    (ft)

    Point-

    gage

    Survey

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Bed

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 1

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 2

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 3

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Reading

    hr 4

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Average

    Reading

    (ft)

    Water-

    surface

    Elevation

    (ft)

    Depth

    (ft)

    Vertical

    Depth

    (ft)

    Continuity

    Velocity

    (ft/s)

    EGL

    (Continuity)

    (ft)

    3.65 3.28 Center 17.21 99.92 82.71 15.95 16.95 15.94 15.94 16.20 83.73 1.02 1.13 19.21 89.35

    5.65 5.07 Center 17.14 99.03 81.89 16.08 16.04 16.05 16.06 16.06 82.97 1.08 1.21 18.01 87.90

    7.65 6.87 Center 17.23 98.16 80.93 16.18 16.15 16.17 16.16 16.17 82.00 1.07 1.19 18.31 87.09

    9.65 8.66 Center 17.18 97.26 80.08 16.18 16.17 16.18 16.18 16.18 81.08 1.00 1.12 19.45 86.85

    11.65 10.46 Center 17.09 96.38 79.29 16.15 16.13 16.14 16.13 16.14 80.24 0.95 1.06 20.47 86.65

    13.65 12.25 Center 17.26 95.50 78.24 16.19 16.17 16.18 16.19 16.18 79.32 1.08 1.20 18.10 84.29

    15.65 14.05 Center 17.16 94.60 77.44 16.33 16.28 16.27 16.28 16.29 78.31 0.87 0.97 22.41 86.02

    17.65 15.84 Center 17.11 93.73 76.62 16.32 16.28 16.28 16.29 16.29 77.44 0.82 0.91 23.85 86.19

    19.65 17.64 Center 17.20 92.86 75.66 16.29 16.27 16.26 16.30 16.28 76.58 0.92 1.03 21.20 83.46

    21.65 19.43 Center 17.23 92.02 74.79 16.29 16.27 16.26 16.27 16.27 75.75 0.96 1.07 20.37 82.09

    23.65 21.23 Center 17.03 91.09 74.06 16.26 16.26 16.27 16.29 16.27 74.82 0.76 0.85 25.66 84.96

    25.65 23.02 Center 17.16 90.20 73.04 16.20 16.20 16.20 16.22 16.21 74.00 0.95 1.06 20.42 80.37

    27.65 24.82 Center 17.02 89.35 72.33 16.24 16.17 16.22 16.19 16.21 73.15 0.81 0.91 23.93 81.95

    29.65 26.61 Center 17.25 88.46 71.21 16.18 16.26 16.26 16.23 16.23 72.23 1.02 1.13 19.16 77.83

    31.65 28.41 Center 17.25 87.57 70.32 16.34 16.32 16.34 16.35 16.34 71.23 0.91 1.02 21.37 78.23

    33.65 30.20 Center 17.13 86.69 69.56 16.34 16.27 16.32 16.28 16.30 70.39 0.83 0.92 23.56 78.93

    35.65 32.00 Center 17.28 85.80 68.52 16.20 16.21 16.21 16.20 16.21 69.60 1.08 1.20 18.14 74.59

    37.65 33.79 Center 17.20 84.90 67.70 16.11 16.10 16.15 16.13 16.12 68.78 1.08 1.20 18.10 73.75

  • 27

    3.5 FIVE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST

    Upon conclusion of the four-foot overtopping test, there was no observable contact loss

    or deformation. A maximum test was initiated on November 24th

    , 2008. The system was

    initially seasoned at a low flow rate for five minutes. Subsequently, the flow over the system

    was increased until the maximum discharge available at the facility was reached. The recorded

    discharge was 109.0 cfs, which corresponded to 5.0 feet of overtopping depth. Figure 3-6 is a

    photograph of the 109.0 cfs test in progress.

    Figure 3-6. Five-foot Overtopping Test in Progress

    The test was conducted for a duration of 2 hours and two sets of water surface elevation

    data were collected. Aerated water was observed beginning approximately 36 feet downstream

    of the crest, and therefore, depth measurements beyond this location should be considered

    approximate. After two hours the system became compromised, evident as loss of intimate

    contact between the mattress and granular filter, and shutdown procedures were initiated.

    Following shutdown, bed elevation data were recorded over the intact portions of the test section,

    and the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was carefully removed from the facility. Table 3.6

    presents the 109.0 cfs test data.

  • 28

    Table 3.6. Five-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data

    Tape

    Station

    Horizontal

    Station Position

    Pre-test

    Bed

    Reading

    Point

    Gage

    Survey

    Elevation

    Bed

    Elevation

    Water

    Surface

    Reading

    hr 1

    Water

    Surface

    Reading

    hr 2

    Water

    Surface

    Average

    Reading

    Water

    Surface

    Elevation Depth

    Vertical

    Depth

    Continuity

    Velocity

    EGL

    (Continuity)

    (ft) (ft) ID (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft)

    3.65 3.28 Center 17.22 99.92 82.70 15.55 15.55 15.55 84.37 1.67 1.86 16.32 88.33

    5.65 5.07 Center 17.18 99.03 81.85 15.78 15.74 15.76 83.27 1.42 1.58 19.19 88.84

    7.65 6.87 Center 17.25 98.16 80.91 15.86 15.86 15.86 82.30 1.39 1.55 19.60 88.13

    9.65 8.66 Center 17.20 97.26 80.06 15.91 15.91 15.91 81.35 1.29 1.44 21.12 88.15

    11.65 10.46 Center 17.08 96.38 79.30 15.88 15.87 15.88 80.51 1.21 1.34 22.61 88.32

    13.65 12.25 Center 17.26 95.50 78.24 15.90 15.90 15.90 79.60 1.36 1.52 20.04 85.69

    15.65 14.05 Center 17.16 94.60 77.44 15.98 15.98 15.98 78.62 1.18 1.31 23.09 86.78

    17.65 15.84 Center 17.09 93.73 76.64 15.99 15.99 15.99 77.74 1.10 1.23 24.77 87.16

    19.65 17.64 Center 17.21 92.86 75.65 16.00 16.00 16.00 76.86 1.21 1.35 22.52 84.61

    21.65 19.43 Center 17.26 92.02 74.76 16.03 16.04 16.04 75.99 1.22 1.36 22.24 83.54

    23.65 21.23 Center 17.00 91.09 74.09 16.01 16.03 16.02 75.07 0.98 1.09 27.81 86.98

    25.65 23.02 Center 17.16 90.20 73.04 15.99 15.99 15.99 74.21 1.17 1.30 23.29 82.51

    27.65 24.82 Center 17.05 89.35 72.30 16.01 16.02 16.02 73.34 1.04 1.15 26.33 83.99

    29.65 26.61 Center 17.13 88.46 71.33 16.10 16.08 16.09 72.37 1.04 1.16 26.20 82.92

    31.65 28.41 Center 17.30 87.57 70.27 16.20 16.19 16.20 71.38 1.11 1.23 24.66 80.71

    33.65 30.20 Center 17.11 86.69 69.58 16.15 16.12 16.14 70.56 0.98 1.09 27.95 82.58

    35.65 32.00 Center 17.26 85.80 68.54 16.06 16.05 16.06 69.75 1.21 1.34 22.61 77.56

    37.65 33.79 Center 17.14 84.90 67.76 16.02 16.03 16.03 68.88 1.11 1.24 24.44 78.04

  • 29

    3.6 POST-TESTING EVALUATION

    Upon conclusion of the 109.0 cfs test, the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was removed

    from the flume in order to inspect the underlying subgrade embankment and rock drainage layer.

    After inspection, it was determined that intimate contact had been lost over the lower 30 feet of

    the test section, resulting in exceedance of the performance standard. Figure 3-7 presents

    photographs of the embankment following the test series.

    Figure 3-7. Embankment following Revetment System Removal

  • 30

    4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

    Hydraulic analyses were conducted for Tests 1 through 5. For all tests, water-surface

    profiles were evaluated using a standard step fore-water hydraulic model which computed the

    best-fit Manning’s roughness for the collected data. The hydraulic model developed theoretical

    water-surface profiles with varying Manning’s roughness values to determine the best-fit

    Manning’s roughness for each profile. The best-fit Manning’s roughness was determined from

    maximizing the coefficient of determination, R2. A plot of Manning’s n verses unit discharge is

    presented as Figure 4-1.

    0.032

    0.034

    0.036

    0.038

    0.040

    0.042

    10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

    Unit Discharge (ft2/sec)

    Man

    nin

    g's

    n

    Figure 4-1. Manning’s n verses Unit Discharge for Three-, Four-, and Five-foot

    Overtopping Tests of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress

  • 31

    Based on the developed best-fit profile, velocity and shear stress values were computed.

    Appendix G provides the supporting data for the hydraulic analysis presented in this section.

    Table 4-1 presents the unit discharge, maximum shear stress, maximum velocity, Manning’s n,

    and system condition for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress for each overtopping test.

    Table 4-1. Summary Hydraulics for Overtopping Test Series

    Test

    Number

    Unit

    Discharge

    Maximum

    Shear Stress

    Maximum

    Velocity

    Manning's

    n Condition

    (ft2/sec) (psf) (fps)

    1 2.8 * * * Stable

    2 7.0 6.8 17.2 * Stable

    3 12.5 16.1 19.3 0.039 Stable

    4 19.5 21.5 22.6 0.040 Stable

    5 27.3 24.9 26.2 0.038 Unstable

    * Values not calculable due to the presence of aerated water over the majority of the revetment system

    For this testing series, Tests 4 and 5 were considered to be critical in establishing stability

    thresholds for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress. Therefore, because Test 4 was the final stable

    test and Test 5 resulted in destabilization of the revetment system, detailed hydraulic analyses of

    Tests 4 and 5 are presented below.

    4.1 FOUR-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST

    Water-surface profile data for the four-foot overtopping test were used with the standard

    step fore-water hydraulic model to conduct the hydraulic analysis. The Manning’s roughness

    coefficient was determined to be 0.040 using the hydraulic model. Figure 4-2 provides a

    graphical comparison of the measured flow depth data to the model output flow depth data.

    Furthermore, Figure 4-3 presents the theoretical water-surface profile and energy grade line for

    the model profile.

  • 32

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    1.20

    1.40

    0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

    Station (ft)

    Vert

    ical D

    ep

    th (

    ft)

    Measured Data

    Model Data

    Figure 4-2. Four-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model Flow

    Depth Data

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    90.00

    100.00

    0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

    Station (ft)

    Ele

    va

    tio

    n (

    ft)

    Bed

    Water Surface Elevation

    Energy Grade Line

    Figure 4-3. Four-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.040

  • 33

    Flow velocities and boundary shear stresses were computed at each station for the model

    profile. The continuity equation was used to compute flow velocities and boundary shear

    stresses were computed using the momentum equation. Figure 4-4 provides a graph of velocity

    and shear stress versus horizontal station for the four-foot overtopping test. The highest flow

    velocity and boundary shear stress at the downstream end of the test section were determined to

    be 22.6 ft/s and 21.5 psf, respectively.

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    16.00

    18.00

    20.00

    22.00

    24.00

    0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

    Station (ft)

    Velo

    cit

    y (

    ft/s

    )

    0.00

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    Sh

    ear

    Str

    ess (

    psf)

    Velocity

    Momentum

    Shear Stress

    Figure 4-4. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Four-foot Overtopping Test

    4.2 FIVE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST

    Water-surface profile data for the five-foot overtopping test were used with the standard

    step fore-water hydraulic model to conduct the hydraulic analysis. The Manning’s roughness

    coefficient was determined to be 0.038 using the hydraulic model.

  • 34

    Figure 4-5 provides a graphical comparison of the measured flow depth data to the model

    output flow depth data. Furthermore, Figure 4-6 presents the theoretical water-surface profile

    and energy grade line for the model profile.

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    1.20

    1.40

    1.60

    1.80

    2.00

    0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00

    Station (ft)

    Vert

    ical D

    ep

    th (

    ft)

    Measured Data

    Model Data

    Figure 4-5. Five-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model Flow

    Depth Data

  • 35

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    90.00

    100.00

    0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00

    Station (ft)

    Ele

    va

    tio

    n (

    ft)

    Bed

    Water Surface Elevation

    Energy Grade Line

    Figure 4-6. Five-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.038

    Flow velocities and boundary shear stresses were computed at each station for the model

    profile. The continuity equation was used to compute flow velocities and boundary shear

    stresses were computed using the momentum equation. Figure 4-7 provides a graph of velocity

    and shear stress versus horizontal station for the five-foot overtopping test. The highest flow

    velocity and boundary shear stress at the downstream end of the test section were determined to

    be 26.2 ft/s and 24.9 psf, respectively. However, these values for velocity and shear stress reflect

    the threshold exceedance for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress, and represent a point at which

    system instability was observed.

  • 36

    0.00

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00

    Station (ft)

    Velo

    cit

    y (

    ft/s

    )

    0.00

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    Sh

    ear

    Str

    ess (

    psf)

    Velocity

    Momentum Shear Stress

    Figure 4-7. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Five-foot Overtopping Test

  • 37

    5 SUMMARY

    During the fall of 2008, hydraulic performance testing of the six-inch Triton Filter

    Mattress was conducted by Colorado State University. Testing was performed at the Hydraulics

    Laboratory located at the Engineering Research Center. Descriptions of the revetment

    installation, test facility, test program, test matrix, and resulting database are presented in this

    report. In addition, a preliminary hydraulic analysis was conducted, which identified the largest

    shear stress and velocity maintained within the test section. From this analysis, the revetment

    system was determined to be stable for velocities and shear stresses up to 22.6 ft/s and 21.5 psf,

    respectively. For velocities and shear stress values of 26.2 ft/s and 24.9 psf, respectively, the

    revetment system was determined to be unstable. This report provides data from the hydraulic

    testing of a full-scale revetment system under controlled laboratory conditions for purposes of

    identifying stability threshold conditions.

  • 38

    REFERENCES

    ASTM. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. D422, developed by

    Subcommittee D18.03 of the American Society for Testing and Materials.

    ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using

    Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m

    3)). D1557, developed by Subcommittee

    D18.03 of the American Society for Testing and Materials.

    ASTM. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil

    Classification System). D2487, developed by Subcommittee D18.07 of the American

    Society for Testing and Materials.

    ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Density of Soil and Soil-aggregate in Place by Nuclear

    Methods (Shallow Depth). D2922, developed by Subcommittee D18.08 of the American

    Society for Testing and Materials.

    ASTM. Standard Test Method for Water Content of Soil and Rock in Place by Nuclear Methods

    (Shallow Depth). D3017, developed by Subcommittee D18.08 of the American Society

    for Testing and Materials.

    ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils.

    D4318, developed by Subcommittee D18.03 of the American Society for Testing and

    Materials.

  • 39

    APPENDIX A SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

  • 40

    3-in 2-in 1-in 0.5-in 4 8 704010 16 20 100 140 200

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0.00010.0010.010.1110100Grain Size in millimeters

    Pe

    rce

    nt

    Fin

    er

    by

    We

    igh

    t -

    %

    Figure A-1. Sub-grade Grain Size Distribution

  • 41

    APPENDIX B COMPACTION VERIFICATION

  • 42

    Figure B-1. Compaction Verification for Soil Embankment

  • 43

    APPENDIX C FILTER MATERIAL GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS

  • 44

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    0.010.1110100

    Particle Diameter (mm)

    Perc

    en

    t F

    iner

    (%)

    Figure C-1. Pea Gravel Filter Material Grain-size Distribution Curve

  • 45

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0.00010.0010.010.11101001000

    Particle Diameter (mm)

    Pe

    rcen

    t F

    iner

    (%)

    Figure C-2. Angular Rock Grain-size Distribution Curve

    D84 =30.7 mm D50 = 26.9 mm D16 = 19.1 mm

  • 46

    APPENDIX D PRODUCT INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS

  • 47

  • 48

    Figure D-1. Product Construction and Installation Instructions

  • 49

  • 50

  • 51

  • 52

  • 53

    APPENDIX E GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR STONE INFILL

  • 54

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    0.1110

    Particle Size (inches)

    Perc

    en

    t F

    iner

    Th

    an

    Figure E-1. Grain-size Distribution for Stone Infill

  • 55

    APPENDIX F FILTER FABRIC PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS

  • 56

    Figure F-1. Product Data Sheet for Mirafi 180N

  • 57

    APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS DATA

  • 58

    Table G-1. Four-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress

    Analysis

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface Elevation

    (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    5.07 81.87 83.07 1.21 1.08 18.02 87.88 n/a n/a

    5.17 81.82 83.02 1.20 1.08 18.07 87.86 n/a n/a

    5.27 81.77 82.97 1.20 1.08 18.13 87.84 0.21 12.85

    5.37 81.72 82.91 1.20 1.07 18.18 87.82 0.22 12.94

    5.47 81.67 82.86 1.19 1.07 18.24 87.80 0.22 13.03

    5.57 81.62 82.81 1.19 1.07 18.29 87.77 0.22 13.11

    5.67 81.57 82.76 1.18 1.06 18.34 87.75 0.22 13.20

    5.77 81.52 82.70 1.18 1.06 18.39 87.73 0.22 13.29

    5.87 81.47 82.65 1.18 1.06 18.44 87.71 0.23 13.38

    5.97 81.42 82.60 1.18 1.05 18.49 87.69 0.23 13.46

    6.07 81.37 82.55 1.17 1.05 18.54 87.66 0.23 13.55

    6.17 81.32 82.49 1.17 1.05 18.59 87.64 0.23 13.63

    6.27 81.28 82.44 1.17 1.05 18.64 87.62 0.23 13.72

    6.37 81.23 82.39 1.16 1.04 18.69 87.59 0.24 13.80

    6.47 81.18 82.34 1.16 1.04 18.74 87.57 0.24 13.89

    6.57 81.13 82.28 1.16 1.04 18.79 87.54 0.24 13.97

    6.67 81.08 82.23 1.15 1.04 18.83 87.52 0.24 14.05

    6.77 81.03 82.18 1.15 1.03 18.88 87.50 0.24 14.13

    6.87 80.98 82.13 1.15 1.03 18.92 87.47 0.25 14.21

    6.97 80.93 82.08 1.15 1.03 18.97 87.45 0.25 14.29

    7.07 80.88 82.02 1.14 1.03 19.01 87.42 0.25 14.37

    7.17 80.83 81.97 1.14 1.02 19.06 87.40 0.25 14.45

    7.27 80.78 81.92 1.14 1.02 19.10 87.37 0.25 14.53

    7.37 80.73 81.87 1.14 1.02 19.14 87.34 0.26 14.60

    7.47 80.69 81.82 1.13 1.02 19.19 87.32 0.26 14.68

    7.57 80.64 81.77 1.13 1.01 19.23 87.29 0.26 14.76

    7.67 80.59 81.71 1.13 1.01 19.27 87.27 0.26 14.83

    7.77 80.54 81.66 1.13 1.01 19.31 87.24 0.26 14.91

    7.87 80.49 81.61 1.12 1.01 19.35 87.21 0.27 14.98

    7.97 80.44 81.56 1.12 1.01 19.39 87.19 0.27 15.05

    8.07 80.39 81.51 1.12 1.00 19.43 87.16 0.27 15.13

    8.17 80.34 81.46 1.12 1.00 19.47 87.13 0.27 15.20

    8.27 80.29 81.41 1.11 1.00 19.51 87.11 0.27 15.27

    8.37 80.24 81.35 1.11 1.00 19.55 87.08 0.27 15.34

    8.47 80.19 81.30 1.11 1.00 19.59 87.05 0.28 15.41

    8.57 80.14 81.25 1.11 0.99 19.63 87.02 0.28 15.48

    8.67 80.09 81.20 1.11 0.99 19.67 87.00 0.28 15.55

    8.77 80.05 81.15 1.10 0.99 19.70 86.97 0.28 15.62

    8.87 80.00 81.10 1.10 0.99 19.74 86.94 0.28 15.69

    8.97 79.95 81.05 1.10 0.99 19.78 86.91 0.29 15.76

    9.07 79.90 81.00 1.10 0.98 19.81 86.88 0.29 15.83

    9.17 79.85 80.94 1.09 0.98 19.85 86.85 0.29 15.89

    9.27 79.80 80.89 1.09 0.98 19.88 86.82 0.29 15.96

    9.37 79.75 80.84 1.09 0.98 19.92 86.79 0.29 16.03

  • 59

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface Elevation

    (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    9.47 79.70 80.79 1.09 0.98 19.95 86.77 0.29 16.09

    9.57 79.65 80.74 1.09 0.98 19.99 86.74 0.30 16.15

    9.67 79.60 80.69 1.09 0.97 20.02 86.71 0.30 16.22

    9.77 79.55 80.64 1.08 0.97 20.05 86.68 0.30 16.28

    9.87 79.50 80.59 1.08 0.97 20.09 86.65 0.30 16.35

    9.97 79.46 80.54 1.08 0.97 20.12 86.62 0.30 16.41

    10.07 79.41 80.48 1.08 0.97 20.15 86.59 0.30 16.47

    10.17 79.36 80.43 1.08 0.97 20.18 86.55 0.31 16.53

    10.27 79.31 80.38 1.08 0.96 20.21 86.52 0.31 16.59

    10.37 79.26 80.33 1.07 0.96 20.24 86.49 0.31 16.65

    10.47 79.21 80.28 1.07 0.96 20.28 86.46 0.31 16.71

    10.57 79.16 80.23 1.07 0.96 20.31 86.43 0.31 16.77

    10.67 79.11 80.18 1.07 0.96 20.34 86.40 0.31 16.83

    10.77 79.06 80.13 1.07 0.96 20.37 86.37 0.31 16.89

    10.87 79.01 80.08 1.07 0.96 20.40 86.34 0.32 16.95

    10.97 78.96 80.03 1.06 0.95 20.43 86.30 0.32 17.00

    11.07 78.91 79.98 1.06 0.95 20.45 86.27 0.32 17.06

    11.17 78.87 79.93 1.06 0.95 20.48 86.24 0.32 17.12

    11.27 78.82 79.88 1.06 0.95 20.51 86.21 0.32 17.17

    11.37 78.77 79.82 1.06 0.95 20.54 86.18 0.32 17.23

    11.47 78.72 79.77 1.06 0.95 20.57 86.14 0.33 17.28

    11.57 78.67 79.72 1.06 0.95 20.60 86.11 0.33 17.34

    11.67 78.62 79.67 1.05 0.95 20.62 86.08 0.33 17.39

    11.77 78.57 79.62 1.05 0.94 20.65 86.05 0.33 17.44

    11.87 78.52 79.57 1.05 0.94 20.68 86.01 0.33 17.50

    11.97 78.47 79.52 1.05 0.94 20.70 85.98 0.33 17.55

    12.07 78.42 79.47 1.05 0.94 20.73 85.95 0.33 17.60

    12.17 78.37 79.42 1.05 0.94 20.75 85.91 0.34 17.65

    12.27 78.32 79.37 1.05 0.94 20.78 85.88 0.34 17.71

    12.37 78.28 79.32 1.04 0.94 20.81 85.84 0.34 17.76

    12.47 78.23 79.27 1.04 0.94 20.83 85.81 0.34 17.81

    12.57 78.18 79.22 1.04 0.93 20.86 85.78 0.34 17.86

    12.67 78.13 79.17 1.04 0.93 20.88 85.74 0.34 17.91

    12.77 78.08 79.12 1.04 0.93 20.90 85.71 0.34 17.96

    12.87 78.03 79.07 1.04 0.93 20.93 85.67 0.34 18.00

    12.97 77.98 79.02 1.04 0.93 20.95 85.64 0.35 18.05

    13.07 77.93 78.97 1.04 0.93 20.98 85.60 0.35 18.10

    13.17 77.88 78.92 1.03 0.93 21.00 85.57 0.35 18.15

    13.27 77.83 78.87 1.03 0.93 21.02 85.53 0.35 18.19

    13.37 77.78 78.82 1.03 0.93 21.05 85.50 0.35 18.24

    13.47 77.73 78.77 1.03 0.93 21.07 85.46 0.35 18.29

    13.57 77.69 78.72 1.03 0.92 21.09 85.43 0.35 18.33

    13.67 77.64 78.67 1.03 0.92 21.11 85.39 0.36 18.38

    13.77 77.59 78.61 1.03 0.92 21.13 85.36 0.36 18.42

    13.87 77.54 78.56 1.03 0.92 21.16 85.32 0.36 18.47

    13.97 77.49 78.51 1.03 0.92 21.18 85.29 0.36 18.51

    14.07 77.44 78.46 1.03 0.92 21.20 85.25 0.36 18.55

  • 60

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface Elevation

    (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    14.17 77.39 78.41 1.02 0.92 21.22 85.21 0.36 18.60

    14.27 77.34 78.36 1.02 0.92 21.24 85.18 0.36 18.64

    14.37 77.29 78.31 1.02 0.92 21.26 85.14 0.36 18.68

    14.47 77.24 78.26 1.02 0.92 21.28 85.10 0.36 18.73

    14.57 77.19 78.21 1.02 0.92 21.30 85.07 0.37 18.77

    14.67 77.14 78.16 1.02 0.91 21.32 85.03 0.37 18.81

    14.77 77.09 78.11 1.02 0.91 21.34 84.99 0.37 18.85

    14.87 77.05 78.06 1.02 0.91 21.36 84.96 0.37 18.89

    14.97 77.00 78.01 1.02 0.91 21.38 84.92 0.37 18.93

    15.07 76.95 77.96 1.02 0.91 21.40 84.88 0.37 18.97

    15.17 76.90 77.91 1.01 0.91 21.42 84.85 0.37 19.01

    15.27 76.85 77.86 1.01 0.91 21.44 84.81 0.37 19.05

    15.37 76.80 77.81 1.01 0.91 21.46 84.77 0.37 19.09

    15.47 76.75 77.76 1.01 0.91 21.48 84.73 0.38 19.13

    15.57 76.70 77.71 1.01 0.91 21.49 84.70 0.38 19.16

    15.67 76.65 77.66 1.01 0.91 21.51 84.66 0.38 19.20

    15.77 76.60 77.61 1.01 0.91 21.53 84.62 0.38 19.24

    15.87 76.55 77.56 1.01 0.91 21.55 84.58 0.38 19.28

    15.97 76.50 77.51 1.01 0.90 21.56 84.54 0.38 19.31

    16.07 76.46 77.46 1.01 0.90 21.58 84.51 0.38 19.35

    16.17 76.41 77.41 1.01 0.90 21.60 84.47 0.38 19.38

    16.27 76.36 77.36 1.01 0.90 21.62 84.43 0.38 19.42

    16.37 76.31 77.31 1.00 0.90 21.63 84.39 0.39 19.46

    16.47 76.26 77.26 1.00 0.90 21.65 84.35 0.39 19.49

    16.57 76.21 77.21 1.00 0.90 21.67 84.31 0.39 19.53

    16.67 76.16 77.16 1.00 0.90 21.68 84.27 0.39 19.56

    16.77 76.11 77.11 1.00 0.90 21.70 84.23 0.39 19.59

    16.87 76.06 77.06 1.00 0.90 21.71 84.20 0.39 19.63

    16.97 76.01 77.01 1.00 0.90 21.73 84.16 0.39 19.66

    17.07 75.96 76.96 1.00 0.90 21.75 84.12 0.39 19.70

    17.17 75.91 76.91 1.00 0.90 21.76 84.08 0.39 19.73

    17.27 75.87 76.86 1.00 0.90 21.78 84.04 0.39 19.76

    17.37 75.82 76.81 1.00 0.89 21.79 84.00 0.39 19.79

    17.47 75.77 76.76 1.00 0.89 21.81 83.96 0.40 19.82

    17.57 75.72 76.71 1.00 0.89 21.82 83.92 0.40 19.86

    17.67 75.67 76.66 1.00 0.89 21.84 83.88 0.40 19.89

    17.77 75.62 76.61 0.99 0.89 21.85 83.84 0.40 19.92

    17.87 75.57 76.56 0.99 0.89 21.86 83.80 0.40 19.95

    17.97 75.52 76.51 0.99 0.89 21.88 83.76 0.40 19.98

    18.07 75.47 76.46 0.99 0.89 21.89 83.72 0.40 20.01

    18.17 75.42 76.41 0.99 0.89 21.91 83.68 0.40 20.04

    18.27 75.37 76.36 0.99 0.89 21.92 83.64 0.40 20.07

    18.37 75.32 76.31 0.99 0.89 21.93 83.60 0.40 20.10

    18.47 75.27 76.27 0.99 0.89 21.95 83.56 0.40 20.13

    18.57 75.23 76.22 0.99 0.89 21.96 83.52 0.41 20.16

    18.67 75.18 76.17 0.99 0.89 21.97 83.48 0.41 20.19

    18.77 75.13 76.12 0.99 0.89 21.99 83.44 0.41 20.21

  • 61

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface Elevation

    (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    18.87 75.08 76.07 0.99 0.89 22.00 83.40 0.41 20.24

    18.97 75.03 76.02 0.99 0.89 22.01 83.36 0.41 20.27

    19.07 74.98 75.97 0.99 0.89 22.03 83.31 0.41 20.30

    19.17 74.93 75.92 0.99 0.88 22.04 83.27 0.41 20.32

    19.27 74.88 75.87 0.99 0.88 22.05 83.23 0.41 20.35

    19.37 74.83 75.82 0.98 0.88 22.06 83.19 0.41 20.38

    19.47 74.78 75.77 0.98 0.88 22.08 83.15 0.41 20.40

    19.57 74.73 75.72 0.98 0.88 22.09 83.11 0.41 20.43

    19.67 74.68 75.67 0.98 0.88 22.10 83.07 0.41 20.46

    19.77 74.64 75.62 0.98 0.88 22.11 83.03 0.41 20.48

    19.87 74.59 75.57 0.98 0.88 22.12 82.98 0.42 20.51

    19.97 74.54 75.52 0.98 0.88 22.13 82.94 0.42 20.53

    20.07 74.49 75.47 0.98 0.88 22.15 82.90 0.42 20.56

    20.17 74.44 75.42 0.98 0.88 22.16 82.86 0.42 20.58

    20.27 74.39 75.37 0.98 0.88 22.17 82.82 0.42 20.61

    20.37 74.34 75.32 0.98 0.88 22.18 82.78 0.42 20.63

    20.47 74.29 75.27 0.98 0.88 22.19 82.73 0.42 20.66

    20.57 74.24 75.22 0.98 0.88 22.20 82.69 0.42 20.68

    20.67 74.19 75.17 0.98 0.88 22.21 82.65 0.42 20.70

    20.77 74.14 75.12 0.98 0.88 22.22 82.61 0.42 20.73

    20.87 74.09 75.07 0.98 0.88 22.23 82.57 0.42 20.75

    20.97 74.05 75.02 0.98 0.88 22.24 82.52 0.42 20.77

    21.07 74.00 74.97 0.98 0.88 22.26 82.48 0.42 20.80

    21.17 73.95 74.92 0.98 0.88 22.27 82.44 0.42 20.82

    21.27 73.90 74.87 0.98 0.88 22.28 82.40 0.43 20.84

    21.37 73.85 74.82 0.98 0.88 22.29 82.35 0.43 20.86

    21.47 73.80 74.77 0.97 0.87 22.30 82.31 0.43 20.88

    21.57 73.75 74.72 0.97 0.87 22.31 82.27 0.43 20.91

    21.67 73.70 74.67 0.97 0.87 22.32 82.22 0.43 20.93

    21.77 73.65 74.62 0.97 0.87 22.32 82.18 0.43 20.95

    21.87 73.60 74.58 0.97 0.87 22.33 82.14 0.43 20.97

    21.97 73.55 74.53 0.97 0.87 22.34 82.10 0.43 20.99

    22.07 73.50 74.48 0.97 0.87 22.35 82.05 0.43 21.01

    22.17 73.45 74.43 0.97 0.87 22.36 82.01 0.43 21.03

    22.27 73.41 74.38 0.97 0.87 22.37 81.97 0.43 21.05

    22.37 73.36 74.33 0.97 0.87 22.38 81.92 0.43 21.07

    22.47 73.31 74.28 0.97 0.87 22.39 81.88 0.43 21.09

    22.57 73.26 74.23 0.97 0.87 22.40 81.84 0.43 21.11

    22.67 73.21 74.18 0.97 0.87 22.41 81.79 0.43 21.13

    22.77 73.16 74.13 0.97 0.87 22.42 81.75 0.43 21.15

    22.87 73.11 74.08 0.97 0.87 22.42 81.71 0.43 21.17

    22.97 73.06 74.03 0.97 0.87 22.43 81.66 0.44 21.19

    23.07 73.01 73.98 0.97 0.87 22.44 81.62 0.44 21.21

    23.17 72.96 73.93 0.97 0.87 22.45 81.58 0.44 21.23

    23.27 72.91 73.88 0.97 0.87 22.46 81.53 0.44 21.24

    23.37 72.86 73.83 0.97 0.87 22.47 81.49 0.44 21.26

    23.47 72.82 73.78 0.97 0.87 22.47 81.44 0.44 21.28

  • 62

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface Elevation

    (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    23.57 72.77 73.73 0.97 0.87 22.48 81.40 0.44 21.30

    23.67 72.72 73.68 0.97 0.87 22.49 81.36 0.44 21.32

    23.77 72.67 73.63 0.97 0.87 22.50 81.31 0.44 21.33

    23.87 72.62 73.58 0.97 0.87 22.51 81.27 0.44 21.35

    23.97 72.57 73.53 0.97 0.87 22.51 81.22 0.44 21.37

    24.07 72.52 73.48 0.96 0.87 22.52 81.18 0.44 21.39

    24.17 72.47 73.43 0.96 0.87 22.53 81.14 0.44 21.40

    24.27 72.42 73.39 0.96 0.87 22.54 81.09 0.44 21.42

    24.37 72.37 73.34 0.96 0.86 22.54 81.05 0.44 21.44

    24.47 72.32 73.29 0.96 0.86 22.55 81.00 0.44 21.45

    24.57 72.27 73.24 0.96 0.86 22.56 80.96 0.44 21.47

    24.67 72.22 73.19 0.96 0.86 22.57 80.91 0.44 21.48

    24.77 72.18 73.14 0.96 0.86 22.57 80.87 0.44 21.50

  • 63

    Table G-2. Five-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress

    Analysis

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface

    Elevation (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    3.28 82.73 84.59 1.86 1.67 16.31 88.36 n/a n/a

    3.38 82.68 84.53 1.85 1.66 16.41 88.35 n/a n/a

    3.48 82.63 84.47 1.84 1.65 16.50 88.34 0.09 8.41

    3.58 82.58 84.41 1.83 1.64 16.59 88.33 0.09 8.52

    3.68 82.53 84.35 1.82 1.63 16.69 88.32 0.09 8.64

    3.78 82.48 84.29 1.81 1.62 16.78 88.31 0.10 8.75

    3.88 82.43 84.23 1.80 1.62 16.87 88.30 0.10 8.86

    3.98 82.38 84.17 1.79 1.61 16.96 88.29 0.10 8.97

    4.08 82.33 84.11 1.78 1.60 17.04 88.28 0.10 9.08

    4.18 82.28 84.06 1.77 1.59 17.13 88.27 0.10 9.19

    4.28 82.24 84.00 1.76 1.58 17.22 88.26 0.10 9.30

    4.38 82.19 83.94 1.75 1.58 17.30 88.25 0.11 9.40

    4.48 82.14 83.88 1.75 1.57 17.38 88.24 0.11 9.51

    4.58 82.09 83.83 1.74 1.56 17.47 88.23 0.11 9.62

    4.68 82.04 83.77 1.73 1.55 17.55 88.22 0.11 9.72

    4.78 81.99 83.71 1.72 1.55 17.63 88.21 0.11 9.83

    4.88 81.94 83.66 1.71 1.54 17.71 88.20 0.12 9.93

    4.98 81.89 83.60 1.71 1.53 17.79 88.19 0.12 10.04

    5.08 81.84 83.54 1.70 1.53 17.86 88.17 0.12 10.14

    5.18 81.79 83.49 1.69 1.52 17.94 88.16 0.12 10.24

    5.28 81.75 83.43 1.68 1.51 18.02 88.15 0.12 10.35

    5.38 81.70 83.37 1.68 1.51 18.09 88.14 0.12 10.45

    5.48 81.65 83.32 1.67 1.50 18.17 88.12 0.13 10.55

    5.58 81.60 83.26 1.66 1.49 18.24 88.11 0.13 10.65

    5.68 81.55 83.21 1.66 1.49 18.31 88.10 0.13 10.75

    5.78 81.50 83.15 1.65 1.48 18.39 88.09 0.13 10.85

    5.88 81.45 83.10 1.64 1.48 18.46 88.07 0.13 10.95

    5.98 81.40 83.04 1.64 1.47 18.53 88.06 0.13 11.05

    6.08 81.35 82.98 1.63 1.47 18.60 88.05 0.14 11.15

    6.18 81.30 82.93 1.63 1.46 18.67 88.03 0.14 11.25

    6.28 81.26 82.87 1.62 1.45 18.74 88.02 0.14 11.35

    6.38 81.21 82.82 1.61 1.45 18.81 88.00 0.14 11.44

    6.48 81.16 82.77 1.61 1.44 18.87 87.99 0.14 11.54

    6.58 81.11 82.71 1.60 1.44 18.94 87.98 0.14 11.64

    6.68 81.06 82.66 1.60 1.43 19.01 87.96 0.15 11.73

    6.78 81.01 82.60 1.59 1.43 19.07 87.95 0.15 11.83

    6.88 80.96 82.55 1.59 1.42 19.14 87.93 0.15 11.92

    6.98 80.91 82.49 1.58 1.42 19.20 87.92 0.15 12.02

    7.08 80.86 82.44 1.58 1.41 19.26 87.90 0.15 12.11

    7.18 80.81 82.38 1.57 1.41 19.33 87.89 0.15 12.20

    7.28 80.77 82.33 1.57 1.41 19.39 87.87 0.16 12.29

    7.38 80.72 82.28 1.56 1.40 19.45 87.85 0.16 12.39

    7.48 80.67 82.22 1.56 1.40 19.51 87.84 0.16 12.48

    7.58 80.62 82.17 1.55 1.39 19.57 87.82 0.16 12.57

  • 64

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface

    Elevation (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    7.68 80.57 82.11 1.55 1.39 19.63 87.81 0.16 12.66

    7.78 80.52 82.06 1.54 1.38 19.69 87.79 0.16 12.75

    7.88 80.47 82.01 1.54 1.38 19.75 87.77 0.17 12.84

    7.98 80.42 81.95 1.53 1.38 19.81 87.76 0.17 12.93

    8.08 80.37 81.90 1.53 1.37 19.87 87.74 0.17 13.02

    8.18 80.32 81.85 1.52 1.37 19.92 87.72 0.17 13.11

    8.28 80.28 81.79 1.52 1.36 19.98 87.70 0.17 13.19

    8.38 80.23 81.74 1.51 1.36 20.04 87.69 0.17 13.28

    8.48 80.18 81.69 1.51 1.36 20.09 87.67 0.18 13.37

    8.58 80.13 81.63 1.51 1.35 20.15 87.65 0.18 13.46

    8.68 80.08 81.58 1.50 1.35 20.20 87.63 0.18 13.54

    8.78 80.03 81.53 1.50 1.35 20.26 87.62 0.18 13.63

    8.88 79.98 81.48 1.49 1.34 20.31 87.60 0.18 13.71

    8.98 79.93 81.42 1.49 1.34 20.36 87.58 0.18 13.80

    9.08 79.88 81.37 1.49 1.33 20.42 87.56 0.19 13.88

    9.18 79.83 81.32 1.48 1.33 20.47 87.54 0.19 13.97

    9.28 79.78 81.26 1.48 1.33 20.52 87.52 0.19 14.05

    9.38 79.74 81.21 1.48 1.32 20.57 87.50 0.19 14.13

    9.48 79.69 81.16 1.47 1.32 20.62 87.48 0.19 14.22

    9.58 79.64 81.11 1.47 1.32 20.68 87.47 0.19 14.30

    9.68 79.59 81.05 1.46 1.31 20.73 87.45 0.20 14.38

    9.78 79.54 81.00 1.46 1.31 20.78 87.43 0.20 14.46

    9.88 79.49 80.95 1.46 1.31 20.83 87.41 0.20 14.54

    9.98 79.44 80.90 1.45 1.31 20.87 87.39 0.20 14.62

    10.08 79.39 80.84 1.45 1.30 20.92 87.37 0.20 14.70

    10.18 79.34 80.79 1.45 1.30 20.97 87.35 0.20 14.78

    10.28 79.29 80.74 1.44 1.30 21.02 87.33 0.20 14.86

    10.38 79.25 80.69 1.44 1.29 21.07 87.31 0.21 14.94

    10.48 79.20 80.63 1.44 1.29 21.11 87.28 0.21 15.02

    10.58 79.15 80.58 1.43 1.29 21.16 87.26 0.21 15.10

    10.68 79.10 80.53 1.43 1.28 21.21 87.24 0.21 15.17

    10.78 79.05 80.48 1.43 1.28 21.25 87.22 0.21 15.25

    10.88 79.00 80.43 1.42 1.28 21.30 87.20 0.21 15.33

    10.98 78.95 80.37 1.42 1.28 21.34 87.18 0.22 15.41

    11.08 78.90 80.32 1.42 1.27 21.39 87.16 0.22 15.48

    11.18 78.85 80.27 1.42 1.27 21.43 87.13 0.22 15.56

    11.28 78.80 80.22 1.41 1.27 21.48 87.11 0.22 15.63

    11.38 78.76 80.17 1.41 1.27 21.52 87.09 0.22 15.71

    11.48 78.71 80.11 1.41 1.26 21.56 87.07 0.22 15.78

    11.58 78.66 80.06 1.40 1.26 21.61 87.05 0.22 15.85

    11.68 78.61 80.01 1.40 1.26 21.65 87.02 0.23 15.93

    11.78 78.56 79.96 1.40 1.26 21.69 87.00 0.23 16.00

    11.88 78.51 79.91 1.40 1.25 21.73 86.98 0.23 16.07

    11.98 78.46 79.86 1.39 1.25 21.77 86.95 0.23 16.15

    12.08 78.41 79.80 1.39 1.25 21.82 86.93 0.23 16.22

    12.18 78.36 79.75 1.39 1.25 21.86 86.91 0.23 16.29

  • 65

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface

    Elevation (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    12.28 78.31 79.70 1.39 1.24 21.90 86.88 0.23 16.36

    12.38 78.27 79.65 1.38 1.24 21.94 86.86 0.24 16.43

    12.48 78.22 79.60 1.38 1.24 21.98 86.84 0.24 16.50

    12.58 78.17 79.55 1.38 1.24 22.02 86.81 0.24 16.57

    12.68 78.12 79.49 1.38 1.24 22.06 86.79 0.24 16.64

    12.78 78.07 79.44 1.37 1.23 22.10 86.77 0.24 16.71

    12.88 78.02 79.39 1.37 1.23 22.13 86.74 0.24 16.78

    12.98 77.97 79.34 1.37 1.23 22.17 86.72 0.24 16.85

    13.08 77.92 79.29 1.37 1.23 22.21 86.69 0.25 16.92

    13.18 77.87 79.24 1.36 1.22 22.25 86.67 0.25 16.98

    13.28 77.82 79.19 1.36 1.22 22.29 86.64 0.25 17.05

    13.38 77.78 79.14 1.36 1.22 22.32 86.62 0.25 17.12

    13.48 77.73 79.08 1.36 1.22 22.36 86.59 0.25 17.19

    13.58 77.68 79.03 1.35 1.22 22.40 86.57 0.25 17.25

    13.68 77.63 78.98 1.35 1.21 22.43 86.54 0.25 17.32

    13.78 77.58 78.93 1.35 1.21 22.47 86.52 0.26 17.38

    13.88 77.53 78.88 1.35 1.21 22.51 86.49 0.26 17.45

    13.98 77.48 78.83 1.35 1.21 22.54 86.46 0.26 17.51

    14.08 77.43 78.78 1.34 1.21 22.58 86.44 0.26 17.58

    14.18 77.38 78.73 1.34 1.21 22.61 86.41 0.26 17.64

    14.28 77.33 78.67 1.34 1.20 22.65 86.39 0.26 17.70

    14.38 77.29 78.62 1.34 1.20 22.68 86.36 0.26 17.77

    14.48 77.24 78.57 1.34 1.20 22.72 86.33 0.27 17.83

    14.58 77.19 78.52 1.33 1.20 22.75 86.31 0.27 17.89

    14.68 77.14 78.47 1.33 1.20 22.78 86.28 0.27 17.96

    14.78 77.09 78.42 1.33 1.19 22.82 86.25 0.27 18.02

    14.88 77.04 78.37 1.33 1.19 22.85 86.23 0.27 18.08

    14.98 76.99 78.32 1.33 1.19 22.88 86.20 0.27 18.14

    15.08 76.94 78.27 1.32 1.19 22.91 86.17 0.27 18.20

    15.18 76.89 78.22 1.32 1.19 22.95 86.14 0.27 18.26

    15.28 76.84 78.17 1.32 1.19 22.98 86.12 0.28 18.32

    15.38 76.80 78.11 1.32 1.18 23.01 86.09 0.28 18.38

    15.48 76.75 78.06 1.32 1.18 23.04 86.06 0.28 18.44

    15.58 76.70 78.01 1.32 1.18 23.07 86.03 0.28 18.50

    15.68 76.65 77.96 1.31 1.18 23.11 86.01 0.28 18.56

    15.78 76.60 77.91 1.31 1.18 23.14 85.98 0.28 18.62

    15.88 76.55 77.86 1.31 1.18 23.17 85.95 0.28 18.67

    15.98 76.50 77.81 1.31 1.17 23.20 85.92 0.28 18.73

    16.08 76.45 77.76 1.31 1.17 23.23 85.89 0.29 18.79

    16.18 76.40 77.71 1.30 1.17 23.26 85.86 0.29 18.84

    16.28 76.35 77.66 1.30 1.17 23.29 85.83 0.29 18.90

    16.38 76.31 77.61 1.30 1.17 23.32 85.81 0.29 18.96

    16.48 76.26 77.56 1.30 1.17 23.35 85.78 0.29 19.01

    16.58 76.21 77.51 1.30 1.17 23.38 85.75 0.29 19.07

    16.68 76.16 77.46 1.30 1.16 23.40 85.72 0.29 19.13

    16.78 76.11 77.40 1.30 1.16 23.43 85.69 0.29 19.18

  • 66

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface

    Elevation (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    16.88 76.06 77.35 1.29 1.16 23.46 85.66 0.30 19.23

    16.98 76.01 77.30 1.29 1.16 23.49 85.63 0.30 19.29

    17.08 75.96 77.25 1.29 1.16 23.52 85.60 0.30 19.34

    17.18 75.91 77.20 1.29 1.16 23.55 85.57 0.30 19.40

    17.28 75.86 77.15 1.29 1.16 23.57 85.54 0.30 19.45

    17.38 75.82 77.10 1.29 1.15 23.60 85.51 0.30 19.50

    17.48 75.77 77.05 1.28 1.15 23.63 85.48 0.30 19.56

    17.58 75.72 77.00 1.28 1.15 23.65 85.45 0.30 19.61

    17.68 75.67 76.95 1.28 1.15 23.68 85.42 0.30 19.66

    17.78 75.62 76.90 1.28 1.15 23.71 85.39 0.31 19.71

    17.88 75.57 76.85 1.28 1.15 23.73 85.36 0.31 19.76

    17.98 75.52 76.80 1.28 1.15 23.76 85.33 0.31 19.81

    18.08 75.47 76.75 1.28 1.15 23.79 85.30 0.31 19.87

    18.18 75.42 76.70 1.27 1.14 23.81 85.26 0.31 19.92

    18.28 75.37 76.65 1.27 1.14 23.84 85.23 0.31 19.97

    18.38 75.33 76.60 1.27 1.14 23.86 85.20 0.31 20.02

    18.48 75.28 76.55 1.27 1.14 23.89 85.17 0.31 20.07

    18.58 75.23 76.50 1.27 1.14 23.91 85.14 0.31 20.11

    18.68 75.18 76.45 1.27 1.14 23.94 85.11 0.32 20.16

    18.78 75.13 76.40 1.27 1.14 23.96 85.08 0.32 20.21

    18.88 75.08 76.35 1.27 1.14 23.99 85.04 0.32 20.26

    18.98 75.03 76.30 1.26 1.13 24.01 85.01 0.32 20.31

    19.08 74.98 76.24 1.26 1.13 24.04 84.98 0.32 20.36

    19.18 74.93 76.19 1.26 1.13 24.06 84.95 0.32 20.40

    19.28 74.88 76.14 1.26 1.13 24.08 84.92 0.32 20.45

    19.38 74.84 76.09 1.26 1.13 24.11 84.88 0.32 20.50

    19.48 74.79 76.04 1.26 1.13 24.13 84.85 0.32 20.55

    19.58 74.74 75.99 1.26 1.13 24.15 84.82 0.33 20.59

    19.68 74.69 75.94 1.26 1.13 24.18 84.79 0.33 20.64

    19.78 74.64 75.89 1.25 1.13 24.20 84.75 0.33 20.68

    19.88 74.59 75.84 1.25 1.12 24.22 84.72 0.33 20.73

    19.98 74.54 75.79 1.25 1.12 24.25 84.69 0.33 20.77

    20.08 74.49 75.74 1.25 1.12 24.27 84.65 0.33 20.82

    20.18 74.44 75.69 1.25 1.12 24.29 84.62 0.33 20.86

    20.28 74.39 75.64 1.25 1.12 24.31 84.59 0.33 20.91

    20.38 74.35 75.59 1.25 1.12 24.33 84.55 0.33 20.95

    20.48 74.30 75.54 1.25 1.12 24.36 84.52 0.33 21.00

    20.58 74.25 75.49 1.24 1.12 24.38 84.49 0.34 21.04

    20.68 74.20 75.44 1.24 1.12 24.40 84.45 0.34 21.08

    20.78 74.15 75.39 1.24 1.12 24.42 84.42 0.34 21.13

    20.88 74.10 75.34 1.24 1.11 24.44 84.39 0.34 21.17

    20.98 74.05 75.29 1.24 1.11 24.46 84.35 0.34 21.21

    21.08 74.00 75.24 1.24 1.11 24.48 84.32 0.34 21.25

    21.18 73.95 75.19 1.24 1.11 24.50 84.28 0.34 21.30

    21.28 73.90 75.14 1.24 1.11 24.52 84.25 0.34 21.34

    21.38 73.86 75.09 1.24 1.11 24.54 84.21 0.34 21.38

  • 67

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface

    Elevation (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    21.48 73.81 75.04 1.24 1.11 24.56 84.18 0.34 21.42

    21.58 73.76 74.99 1.23 1.11 24.58 84.15 0.35 21.46

    21.68 73.71 74.94 1.23 1.11 24.60 84.11 0.35 21.50

    21.78 73.66 74.89 1.23 1.11 24.62 84.08 0.35 21.54

    21.88 73.61 74.84 1.23 1.11 24.64 84.04 0.35 21.58

    21.98 73.56 74.79 1.23 1.10 24.66 84.01 0.35 21.62

    22.08 73.51 74.74 1.23 1.10 24.68 83.97 0.35 21.66

    22.18 73.46 74.69 1.23 1.10 24.70 83.94 0.35 21.70

    22.28 73.41 74.64 1.23 1.10 24.72 83.90 0.35 21.74

    22.38 73.36 74.59 1.23 1.10 24.74 83.87 0.35 21.78

    22.48 73.32 74.54 1.23 1.10 24.76 83.83 0.35 21.82

    22.58 73.27 74.49 1.22 1.10 24.78 83.80 0.35 21.86

    22.68 73.22 74.44 1.22 1.10 24.79 83.76 0.36 21.89

    22.78 73.17 74.39 1.22 1.10 24.81 83.72 0.36 21.93

    22.88 73.12 74.34 1.22 1.10 24.83 83.69 0.36 21.97

    22.98 73.07 74.29 1.22 1.10 24.85 83.65 0.36 22.01

    23.08 73.02 74.24 1.22 1.10 24.87 83.62 0.36 22.04

    23.18 72.97 74.19 1.22 1.10 24.88 83.58 0.36 22.08

    23.28 72.92 74.14 1.22 1.09 24.90 83.54 0.36 22.12

    23.38 72.87 74.09 1.22 1.09 24.92 83.51 0.36 22.15

    23.48 72.83 74.04 1.22 1.09 24.94 83.47 0.36 22.19

    23.58 72.78 73.99 1.22 1.09 24.95 83.44 0.36 22.23

    23.68 72.73 73.94 1.22 1.09 24.97 83.40 0.36 22.26

    23.78 72.68 73.89 1.21 1.09 24.99 83.36 0.36 22.30

    23.88 72.63 73.84 1.21 1.09 25.00 83.33 0.37 22.33

    23.98 72.58 73.79 1.21 1.09 25.02 83.29 0.37 22.37

    24.08 72.53 73.74 1.21 1.09 25.04 83.25 0.37 22.40

    24.18 72.48 73.69 1.21 1.09 25.05 83.22 0.37 22.44

    24.28 72.43 73.64 1.21 1.09 25.07 83.18 0.37 22.47

    24.38 72.38 73.59 1.21 1.09 25.09 83.14 0.37 22.51

    24.48 72.34 73.54 1.21 1.09 25.10 83.11 0.37 22.54

    24.58 72.29 73.50 1.21 1.08 25.12 83.07 0.37 22.57

    24.68 72.24 73.45 1.21 1.08 25.14 83.03 0.37 22.61

    24.78 72.19 73.40 1.21 1.08 25.15 82.99 0.37 22.64

    24.88 72.14 73.35 1.21 1.08 25.17 82.96 0.37 22.67

    24.98 72.09 73.30 1.21 1.08 25.18 82.92 0.37 22.71

    25.08 72.04 73.25 1.20 1.08 25.20 82.88 0.38 22.74

    25.18 71.99 73.20 1.20 1.08 25.21 82.84 0.38 22.77

    25.28 71.94 73.15 1.20 1.08 25.23 82.81 0.38 22.80

    25.38 71.89 73.10 1.20 1.08 25.24 82.77 0.38 22.84

    25.48 71.85 73.05 1.20 1.08 25.26 82.73 0.38 22.87

    25.58 71.80 73.00 1.20 1.08 25.27 82.69 0.38 22.90

    25.68 71.75 72.95 1.20 1.08 25.29 82.65 0.38 22.93

    25.78 71.70 72.90 1.20 1.08 25.30 82.62 0.38 22.96

    25.88 71.65 72.85 1.20 1.08 25.32 82.58 0.38 22.99

    25.98 71.60 72.80 1.20 1.08 25.33 82.54 0.38 23.02

  • 68

    Station (ft)

    Bed Elevation

    (ft)

    Water-surface

    Elevation (ft)

    Vertical Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Depth

    (ft)

    Flow Velocity

    (ft/s)

    Energy Grade Line (ft)

    Local EGL

    Slope (ft/ft)

    Momentum Shear Stress (psf)

    26.08 71.55 72.75 1.20 1.08 25.35 82.50 0.38 23.05

    26.18 71.50 72.70 1.20 1.07 25.36 82.46 0.38 23.08

    26.28 71.45 72.65 1.20 1.07 25.37 82.43 0.38 23.11

    26.38 71.40 72.60 1.20 1.07 25.39 82.39 0.38 23.14

    26.48 71.36 72.55 1.19 1.07 25.40 82.35 0.39 23.17

    26.58 71.31 72.50 1.19 1.07 25.42 82.31 0.39 23.20

    26.68 71.26 72.45 1.19 1.07 25.43 82.27 0.39 23.23

    26.78 71.21 72.40 1.19 1.07 25.44 82.23 0.39 23.26

    26.88 71.16 72.35 1.19 1.07 25.46 82.19 0.39 23.29

    26.98 71.11 72.30 1.19 1.07 25.47 82.15 0.39 23.32

    27.08 71.06 72.25 1.19 1.07 25.48 82.12 0.39 23.35

    27.18 71.01 72.20 1.19 1.07 25.50 82.08 0.39 23.38

    27.28 70.96 72.15 1.19 1.07 25.51 82.04 0.39 23.40

    27.38 70.91 72.10 1.19 1.07 25.52 82.00 0.39 23.43

    27.48 70.87 72.05 1.19 1.07 25.54 81.96 0.39 23.46

    27.58 70.82 72.00 1.19 1.07 25.55 81.92 0.39 23.49

    27.68 70.77 71.95 1.19 1.07 25.56 81.88 0.39 23.52

    27.78 70.72 71.91 1.19 1.07 25.57 81.84 0.39 23.54

    27.88 70.67 71.86 1.19 1.06 25.59 81.80 0.39 23.57

    27.98 70.62 71.81 1.19 1.06 25.60 81.76 0.40 23