hydraulic testing and data report for six- inch triton filter...
TRANSCRIPT
-
HYDRAULIC TESTING AND DATA REPORT FOR SIX-
INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS
Prepared for
Tensar International Corporation
Colorado State University
Daryl B. Simons Building at the
Engineering Research Center
Fort Collins, Colorado
-
HYDRAULIC TESTING AND DATA REPORT FOR SIX-
INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS
Prepared for
Tensar International Corporation
Prepared by
Christopher I. Thornton
Amanda L. Cox
Michael D. Turner
June 2009
Colorado State University
Daryl B. Simons Building at the
Engineering Research Center
Fort Collins, Colorado
-
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................i
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ iii
LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................v
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................vi
1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1
2 TEST PROGRAM ..............................................................................................................2
2.1 Test Facility ...................................................................................................................2
2.2 Product...........................................................................................................................4
2.3 Embankment Construction .............................................................................................5
2.4 Filter Design and Installation..........................................................................................7
2.5 Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress Construction...................................................................8
2.6 Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress Installation .....................................................................9
2.7 Test Procedure .............................................................................................................13
3 TEST MATRIX AND DATABASE .................................................................................15
3.1 One-foot Overtopping Test...........................................................................................15
3.2 Two-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................20
3.3 Three-foot Overtopping Test ........................................................................................22
3.4 Four-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................24
3.5 Five-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................27
3.6 Post-testing Evaluation.................................................................................................29
4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS ...............................................................................................30
4.1 Four-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................31
4.2 Five-foot Overtopping Test ..........................................................................................33
5 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................37
REFERENCES........................................................................................................................38
APPENDIX A SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES ..............................................................39
APPENDIX B COMPACTION VERIFICATION .............................................................41
APPENDIX C FILTER MATERIAL GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS ..........................43
-
ii
APPENDIX D PRODUCT INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS...................................46
APPENDIX E GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR STONE INFILL.............................53
APPENDIX F FILTER FABRIC PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS...................................55
APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS DATA..............................................................57
-
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1. Photograph of the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress.....................................................1
Figure 2-1. The Engineering Research Center at CSU and Horsetooth Reservoir.......................3
Figure 2-2. Profile View Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility set at 2:1 Slope ...........................4
Figure 2-3. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattresses ...............................................................................5
Figure 2-4. Compacted Embankment before Installation of Six-inch Triton Filter
Mattress...................................................................................................................6
Figure 2-5. Profile View of Granular Filter and Embankment Toe Detail ....................................7
Figure 2-6. Triton Mattress Baffles and Two-by-Six Frames .......................................................8
Figure 2-7. Completed Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress prior to Installation..................................9
Figure 2-8. Mirafi 180N over Compacted Embankment ...........................................................10
Figure 2-9. Crane-installation of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress...............................................11
Figure 2-10. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress following Crane-installation .................................11
Figure 2-11. Cross-sectional View of Sidewall Detail...............................................................12
Figure 2-12. Photograph of Toe Wall and Toe Plate .................................................................13
Figure 3-1. Photograph of Installed Revetment System prior to Testing....................................16
Figure 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test in Progress ..................................................................18
Figure 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test in Progress..................................................................20
Figure 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test in Progress................................................................22
Figure 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test in Progress..................................................................24
Figure 3-6. Five-foot Overtopping Test in Progress ..................................................................27
Figure 3-7. Embankment following Revetment System Removal .............................................29
Figure 4-1. Manning’s n verses Unit Discharge for Three-, Four-, and Five-foot
Overtopping Tests of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress .............................................30
Figure 4-2. Four-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model
Flow Depth Data ...................................................................................................32
Figure 4-3. Four-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.040..................32
Figure 4-4. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Four-foot Overtopping Test.............33
Figure 4-5. Five-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model Flow
Depth Data ............................................................................................................34
Figure 4-6. Five-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.038 ..................35
Figure 4-7. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Five-foot Overtopping Test .............36
Figure A-1. Sub-grade Grain Size Distribution.........................................................................40
Figure B-1. Compaction Verification for Soil Embankment ......................................................42
Figure C-1. Pea Gravel Filter Material Grain-size Distribution Curve.......................................44
Figure C-2. Angular Rock Grain-size Distribution Curve .........................................................45
-
iv
Figure D-1. Product Construction and Installation Instructions ..................................................48
Figure E-1. Grain-size Distribution for Stone Infill....................................................................54
Figure F-1. Product Data Sheet for Mirafi 180N........................................................................56
-
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1. Test Matrix for the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress ..................................................15
Table 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data .............................................................19
Table 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data.............................................................21
Table 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data...........................................................23
Table 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data ............................................................26
Table 3.6. Five-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data .............................................................28
Table 4-1. Summary Hydraulics for Overtopping Test Series ....................................................31
Table G-1. Four-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress
Analysis ................................................................................................................58
Table G-2. Five-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress
Analysis ................................................................................................................63
-
vi
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Symbol
D0 grain size that 0% of the particles are finer than
D50 grain size that 50% of the particles are finer than
D100 grain size that 100% of the particles are finer than
EGL energy grade line
n Manning’s coefficient of hydraulic resistance
Abbreviations
% percent
± plus or minus
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
avg average
cfs cubic feet per second
CSU Colorado State University
ERC Engineering Research Center
ft foot or feet
ft/ft foot per foot
ft/s feet per second
H:V Horizontal:Vertical
hr(s) hour(s)
ID identification
in. inch(es)
lb pound(s)
lb/ft3 pounds per cubic foot
mm/dd/yy month/day/year
pcf pounds per cubic foot
PI Plasticity Index
psf pounds per square foot
psi pounds per square inch
SGOF Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility
-
1
1 INTRODUCTION
During the fall of 2008, hydraulic performance testing was conducted by Colorado State
University (CSU) on one six-inch Triton Filter Mattress manufactured by Tensar International
Corporation. Testing was performed at the Hydraulics Laboratory at the Engineering Research
Center. The Triton Filter Mattress was constructed and installed according to specifications
provided by Tensar International Corporation. A total of five tests were conducted under the test
program. Figure 1-1 presents a photograph of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress during the
installation process. Information presented within this report documents the construction and
testing processes, and also provides data from hydraulic testing of a full-scale revetment system
under controlled laboratory conditions for the purpose of identifying stability threshold
conditions. Descriptions of the test program, test matrix, database, and test summary are
presented in this report.
Figure 1-1. Photograph of the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress
-
2
2 TEST PROGRAM
2.1 TEST FACILITY
Laboratory testing of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was performed at the Hydraulics
Laboratory located at the Engineering Research Center (ERC) at CSU. Colorado State
University’s ERC is comprised of laboratories and offices encompassing virtually all engineering
disciplines. Within the ERC, the Hydraulics Division (a subdivision of the Civil and
Environmental Engineering Department) operates the Hydraulics Laboratory.
Water supply to both outdoor and indoor research facilities is furnished by Horsetooth
Reservoir, which is adjacent to the ERC as presented in Figure 2-1. Flow is conveyed through
an existing pipe network to each facility. Outdoor facilities are gravity fed from Horsetooth
Reservoir with a capacity of approximately 170,000 acre-feet of water and a maximum, static
pressure of approximately 110 pounds per square inch (psi) at the ERC pipe network. Each
outdoor facility has its own independent water delivery system.
-
3
Figure 2-1. The Engineering Research Center at CSU and Horsetooth Reservoir
For this testing program, an overtopping test facility was utilized, which was 4 ft wide by
40 ft long and with a 2H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) slope. The head-box configuration in this
flume allowed for a maximum of 6 ft of overtopping depth. Figure 2-2 presents a profile
drawing of the Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility (SGOF) utilized for the testing program.
Horsetooth
Reservoir
College Lake
ERC
Outdoor Facilities
-
4
Figure 2-2. Profile View Steep Gradient Overtopping Facility set at 2:1 Slope
2.2 PRODUCT
The six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was tested under controlled conditions to provide data
consistent with the current state-of-the-practice in calculating hydraulic performance thresholds.
Three sections of geogrid baffles four-feet in width were provided by Tensar International
Corporation, which consisted of lengths of two twenty-foot sections and an eleven-foot section.
The baffle sections were filled with angular stone, and the finished six-inch Triton Filter
Mattress was tested under the duress of an overtopping test protocol. A photograph of the six-
inch Triton Filter Mattresses is presented as Figure 2-3.
Not To Scale
12-in.
2
1
40-ft
12-in. Soil
10-ft Toe Plate
and Cap
Six-inch Triton Filter
Mattress
Flow Straightener
Five-foot
Granular Filter
-
5
Figure 2-3. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattresses
2.3 EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION
The testing program included construction of an earthen embankment section compacted
between vertical walls of an outdoor flume. To prevent subgrade edge effects from
compromising the integrity of the embankment, channel iron was installed along the walls of the
flume. Soil was placed within the head and toe walls of the test section, and compacted in two
equal lifts of six inches. Soil consisted of a clayey sand with a Plasticity Index (PI) of 10. The
test section was constructed to a height where the finished soil embankment surface was 1 ft
above the floor of the testing facility. Embankment geometry incorporated a horizontal 10 ft
long crest section, and a specified slope length of 40 ft at a angle of 2H:1V. Figure 2-4 presents
a photograph of the compacted soil embankment prior to installation of the six-inch Triton Filter
Mattress.
-
6
Figure 2-4. Compacted Embankment before Installation of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress
Soil information determined and documented during embankment construction included
the following:
• Soil Texture (ASTM D2487 classification);
• Grain size distribution curve (ASTM D422); and
• Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318).
All of the documented physical properties of the soil are located in Appendix A.
Soil moisture content and in-situ dry unit weight were determined by nuclear density
gage along the centerline of the embankment as determined by Terracon, Inc. (ASTM D2922 and
D3017) Three locations on the compacted soil embankment were evaluated for their in-situ
moisture content and dry unit weight. From the crest of the test section, these locations were
approximately 10 ft apart. The in-situ moisture contents for these locations were 8.7, 7.8, and
-
7
7.6 percent by volume and the corresponding compaction percentages were 93, 92, and 90
percent. The Field Density Test Report verifying compaction is located in Appendix B.
2.4 FILTER DESIGN AND INSTALLATION
To reduce the pore pressure created at the downstream end of the embankment, a filter
was designed according to current industry standards and installed just upstream of the porous
toe wall, extending 5 ft upstream. The filter was constructed using angular rock with a D50 of 26
mm, pea gravel with a D50 of 5.7 mm, and sand with a D50 of 0.70 mm. Grain size distribution
curves for the filter material are provided in Appendix C. The filter was installed using the
angular rock extending 2.5 ft upstream of the toe plate with a 2:1 pea gravel to sand mixture
extending the remaining 2.5 ft, creating a total filter thickness of 5 ft. The division between the
soil embankment and granular filter was further established with the placement of a Mirafi 180N
barrier. In addition, a ¼-inch perforated steel plate was placed between the filter mattress and
granular filter. Figure 2-5 presents a schematic of the granular filter layer described above.
Figure 2-5. Profile View of Granular Filter and Embankment Toe Detail
Toe Plate and
End Cap
12 in.
2.5 ft
2.5 ft
Mirafi®
180N
Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress
Soil
2:1 Pea
Gravel:Sand
Angular Rock
NOT TO SCALE
Perforated
Steel Plate
-
8
2.5 SIX-INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS CONSTRUCTION
Construction of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattresses was reflective of standard
procedures provided by Tensar International. The installation instructions are presented in
Appendix D. The geogrid sections were laid flat on the ground, and all vertical seams of the mat
were tied with standard half-hitch knots. Subsequently, two-by-six inch frames were constructed
and placed in alternating baffle sections to add vertical rigidity for the placement of stone infill.
The seamed mat and frames can be seen in Figure 2-6.
Figure 2-6. Triton Mattress Baffles and Two-by-Six Frames
Following the frame installation, angular stone with a D0 of 1.50 inches, D50 of 2.25
inches, and D100 of 3.00 inches was placed in the baffles. A grain size distribution for the stone
installed into the baffles is presented in Appendix E. Stone was placed in the baffles such that
the stone fill level was slightly above the upper vertical edge of the mattress. The top of the
mattress was then sealed with the stitch configuration provided in the manufacturer’s
instructions. The six-inch Triton Filter Mattress following construction can be seen in Figure
2-7.
-
9
Figure 2-7. Completed Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress prior to Installation
2.6 SIX-INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS INSTALLATION
Installation was reflective of standard procedures for revetment systems for hydraulic
stability and accommodated a four foot width of the filter mattress. Mirafi®
180N non-woven
geotextile fabric was placed on the compacted embankment. The product data sheet for Mirafi
180N is presented in Appendix F. The geotextile fabric was placed over the embankment and
forced to follow the contour over the transition between the horizontal approach and 2H:1V test
sections. At the crest of the slope, a V-notch was cut into the fabric and sealed using silicone
adhesive. Also, all joints between the geotextile and facility were sealed with silicone adhesive.
The embankment with the geotextile installed is presented as Figure 2-8.
-
10
Figure 2-8. Mirafi 180N over Compacted Embankment
Subsequently, the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was craned onto the embankment per
the instructions provided by Tensar International. The mattress sections were then sewn to one
another with the stitch configuration provided in the assembly instructions. Figure 2-9 presents a
photograph of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress while being craned into the facility and, Figure
2-10 presents a photograph of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress after crane-installation.
-
11
Figure 2-9. Crane-installation of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress
Figure 2-10. Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress following Crane-installation
-
12
Following standard installation procedures for revetment system testing, potential for
artificially induced scour along the sidewalls was prevented by placing foam wadding along the
one-half inch voids of the revetment system. The edges were then covered with angle iron as
presented in Figure 2-11, which provides a cross-sectional diagram of the test section.
Figure 2-11. Cross-sectional View of Sidewall Detail
The edge treatment prevented water from flowing unobstructed down the edges of the
flume. Flashing was secured to the flume walls and sealed to terminate the filter fabric, ensure
the filter mattress could not be completely removed from the flume, and to restrain the foam
edge treatment. Horizontal projection of the side protection extended five inches into the flume.
The filter was secured at the embankment toe by means of a steel plate which prevented vertical
displacement of the filter mattress, but allowed for expansion of the mattress in the downstream
direction. A photograph of this toe plate is presented in Figure 2-12.
Soil
Flume Wall
Silicone Seal
Flashing
Securing Bolt
Foam Wadding
Six-inch
Triton Filter
Mattress
Channel
Iron Mirafi 180N
Not to Scale
-
13
Figure 2-12. Photograph of Toe Wall and Toe Plate
2.7 TEST PROCEDURE
A test consisted of a continuous 4-hr flow over the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress at a
uniform discharge. The performance threshold for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress tested
within this test program was defined as the point at which deformation, soil loss, or loss of
intimate contact with the embankment sub-grade occurred. Provided that the revetment system
successfully endured the 4-hr flow without exceeding the defined performance threshold, the
procedure was repeated at the next higher target discharge or until the flow capacity of the
testing facility was reached. Typically, target discharges corresponded to predetermined
overtopping depths above the embankment crest elevation (e.g., 1 ft, 2 ft, etc.), although any
discharge could be conveyed through the system provided proper measurement and reporting
procedures were followed. Hourly data collection was maintained for the entire 4 hr test
duration, unless the performance threshold was exceeded.
-
14
Hourly measurements of water-surface elevations were made at 4 ft intervals (stations)
along the centerline of the embankment during each test. Bed elevations (top of revetment
surface) were established prior to and after the termination of each test at the same measurement
stations as the water-surface readings. Locations on the revetment system were identified with a
mark on the wall to ensure consistency in measurement. Flow and elevation measurements were
made to the nearest 0.01 ft using a point gage and survey level.
Discharge was determined independently of the measurements made within the test
section. Determination of the discharge was made using an in-line sonic flow meter located in
the inflow pipe. The in-line sonic flow meter was accurate to ±3%.
-
15
3 TEST MATRIX AND DATABASE
A test matrix was developed to summarize and present the details of the testing program.
Table 3-1 presents the test matrix which includes five tests with overtopping depths of 1-ft
through 5-ft. The 5-ft overtopping test was conducted until intimate contact was lost between the
Triton Filter Mattress and soil embankment. Each test was conducted on the 2H:1V
embankment slope. After completion of the tests outlined in Table 3.1, the collected data were
entered into a database for analysis. The following sections briefly describe conditions during
testing with photographic documentation, and provide the supporting database.
Table 3-1. Test Matrix for the Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress
Test ID
Test Date
(mm/dd/yy)
Embankment Slope (H:V)
Overtopping Depth
(ft)
Measured Discharge
(cfs)
Test Duration
(hrs)
one-foot 11/20/2008 2:1 1.0 11.0 4.0
two-foot 11/20/2008 2:1 2.0 28.0 4.0
three-foot 11/21/2008 2:1 3.0 50.0 4.0
four-foot 11/21/2008 2:1 4.0 78.0 4.0
five-foot 11/24/2008 2:1 5.0 109.0 2.0
3.1 ONE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST
Testing of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress initiated on November 20th
, 2008. The
system was installed as per standard protocol described in Sections 2.3 through 2.6 utilizing a
slope length of 40 ft and a total embankment length including the horizontal approach section of
50 ft. Figure 3.1 is a photograph of the completed installation prior to testing. The system was
surveyed, and photographed to prepare for testing.
-
16
Figure 3-1. Photograph of Installed Revetment System prior to Testing
-
17
Testing commenced with a discharge intended to “season” the embankment by allowing
the system to become saturated. After the system was seasoned, the discharge was increased
until the water level in the headbox was one foot above the embankment. The discharge
recorded for the one-foot overtopping test was 11 cfs. Initially, data were collected at the pre-
established stations, and subsequently at the start of every hour for the remainder of the test. The
test was allowed to proceed for the full 4 hrs as described in Section 2.7, with data collection at
the start of each hour. In addition, aerated water was observed beginning approximately 4 ft
downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test section. Therefore,
depth measurements beyond Station 4 should be considered approximate.
At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and post-test bed
elevation readings were recorded, indicating that there had not been any deformation of the
system or loss of intimate contact with either the subgrade embankment or granular drainage
layer. Figure 3-2 is a photograph of the one-foot overtopping test in progress. Table 3-2
presents the one-foot overtopping test data.
-
18
Figure 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test in Progress
-
19
Table 3-2. One-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data
Tape
Station
(ft)
Horizontal
Station
(ft)
Position
ID
Pre-test
Bed
Reading
(ft)
Point-
gage
Survey
Elevation
(ft)
Bed
Elevation
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 1
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 2
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 3
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 4
(ft)
Water-
surface
Average
Reading
(ft)
Water-
surface
Elevation
(ft)
Depth
(ft)
Vertical
Depth
(ft)
Continuity
Velocity
(ft/s)
EGL
(Continuity)
(ft)
3.65 3.28 Center 17.24 99.92 82.68 17.00 16.95 16.92 16.91 16.95 82.98 0.30 0.33 9.32 84.29
5.65 5.07 Center 17.15 99.03 81.88 16.94 16.92 16.91 16.92 16.92 82.11 0.23 0.25 12.09 84.35
7.65 6.87 Center 17.24 98.16 80.92 17.03 17.01 16.97 16.98 17.00 81.16 0.24 0.27 11.34 83.13
9.65 8.66 Center 17.18 97.26 80.08 16.99 16.97 16.95 16.95 16.97 80.30 0.22 0.24 12.79 82.81
11.65 10.46 Center 17.11 96.38 79.27 16.86 16.86 16.88 16.84 16.86 79.52 0.25 0.28 11.00 81.37
13.65 12.25 Center 17.27 95.50 78.23 16.90 16.91 16.94 16.83 16.90 78.61 0.38 0.42 7.33 79.40
15.65 14.05 Center 17.21 94.60 77.39 17.00 17.04 17.00 17.00 17.01 77.59 0.20 0.22 13.75 80.51
17.65 15.84 Center 17.14 93.73 76.59 17.03 16.96 16.96 16.93 16.97 76.76 0.17 0.19 16.18 80.81
19.65 17.64 Center 17.22 92.86 75.64 16.90 16.92 16.89 16.88 16.90 75.96 0.32 0.36 8.53 77.06
21.65 19.43 Center 17.24 92.02 74.78 16.93 16.98 16.90 16.93 16.93 75.09 0.31 0.34 8.98 76.31
23.65 21.23 Center 17.04 91.09 74.05 16.87 16.88 16.89 16.86 16.88 74.22 0.16 0.18 16.67 78.51
25.65 23.02 Center 17.15 90.20 73.05 16.77 16.80 16.78 16.75 16.78 73.43 0.38 0.42 7.33 74.22
27.65 24.82 Center 17.06 89.35 72.29 16.81 16.83 16.84 16.81 16.82 72.53 0.24 0.26 11.58 74.59
29.65 26.61 Center 17.26 88.46 71.20 16.90 16.93 16.91 16.89 16.91 71.55 0.35 0.39 7.80 72.46
31.65 28.41 Center 17.29 87.57 70.28 16.97 17.05 17.02 16.99 17.01 70.56 0.28 0.31 9.73 72.00
33.65 30.20 Center 17.19 86.69 69.50 16.93 16.96 16.93 16.95 16.94 69.75 0.25 0.28 11.11 71.64
35.65 32.00 Center 17.32 85.80 68.48 16.96 16.98 16.93 16.94 16.95 68.85 0.37 0.41 7.48 69.68
37.65 33.79 Center 17.21 84.90 67.69 16.92 16.95 16.95 16.94 16.94 67.96 0.27 0.30 10.19 69.54
-
20
3.2 TWO-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST
Upon conclusion of the one-foot overtopping test of the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress,
there was no observable contact loss or deformation. The two-foot overtopping test initiated on
November 20th
, 2008. Flow over the system was increased gradually to the two-foot overtopping
depth, achieved at 28 cfs. Figure 3-3 is a photograph of the two-foot test in progress.
Figure 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test in Progress
Initially, data were collected at the pre-established stations, and subsequently at the start
of every hour for the remainder of the test. Aerated water was observed beginning
approximately 10 ft downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test
section. Therefore, depth measurements beyond Station 10 should be considered approximate.
The test was conducted for the full 4 hrs as there was no observable system deformation during
the overtopping test. At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and
post-test bed elevations were recorded, confirming that the system had not exceeded the
performance threshold. Table 3-3 presents the two-foot overtopping test data.
-
21
Table 3-3. Two-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data
Tape
Station
(ft)
Horizontal
Station
(ft)
Position
ID
Pre-test
Bed
Reading
(ft)
Point-
gage
Survey
Elevation
(ft)
Bed
Elevation
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 1
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 2
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 3
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 4
(ft)
Water-
surface
Average
Reading
(ft)
Water-
surface
Elevation
(ft)
Depth
(ft)
Vertical
Depth
(ft)
Continuity
Velocity
(ft/s)
EGL
(Continuity)
(ft)
3.65 3.28 Center 17.23 99.92 82.69 16.63 16.63 16.63 16.63 16.63 83.29 0.60 0.67 11.67 85.34
5.65 5.07 Center 17.14 99.03 81.89 16.67 16.66 16.67 16.67 16.67 82.36 0.47 0.53 14.81 85.72
7.65 6.87 Center 17.23 98.16 80.93 16.79 16.79 16.78 16.80 16.79 81.37 0.44 0.49 15.91 85.26
9.65 8.66 Center 17.18 97.26 80.08 16.76 16.74 16.75 16.75 16.75 80.51 0.43 0.48 16.28 84.58
11.65 10.46 Center 17.10 96.38 79.28 16.65 16.66 16.64 16.65 16.65 79.73 0.45 0.50 15.56 83.44
13.65 12.25 Center 17.27 95.50 78.23 16.66 16.70 16.67 16.63 16.67 78.84 0.61 0.67 11.57 80.85
15.65 14.05 Center 17.18 94.60 77.42 16.73 16.76 16.71 16.72 16.73 77.87 0.45 0.50 15.56 81.58
17.65 15.84 Center 17.11 93.73 76.62 16.75 16.75 16.70 16.74 16.74 77.00 0.38 0.42 18.67 82.37
19.65 17.64 Center 17.21 92.86 75.65 16.69 16.69 16.66 16.69 16.68 76.18 0.53 0.59 13.27 78.86
21.65 19.43 Center 17.21 92.02 74.81 16.70 16.72 16.63 16.70 16.69 75.33 0.52 0.58 13.40 78.07
23.65 21.23 Center 17.03 91.09 74.06 16.68 16.70 16.66 16.67 16.68 74.41 0.35 0.39 19.86 80.50
25.65 23.02 Center 17.16 90.20 73.04 16.57 16.60 16.61 16.57 16.59 73.61 0.57 0.64 12.23 75.88
27.65 24.82 Center 17.04 89.35 72.31 16.63 16.57 16.59 16.50 16.57 72.78 0.47 0.52 14.97 76.21
29.65 26.61 Center 17.25 88.46 71.21 16.68 16.59 16.62 16.61 16.63 71.84 0.63 0.70 11.20 73.72
31.65 28.41 Center 17.26 87.57 70.31 16.71 16.75 16.74 16.71 16.73 70.84 0.53 0.59 13.15 73.47
33.65 30.20 Center 17.16 86.69 69.53 16.74 16.77 16.74 16.72 16.74 69.95 0.42 0.47 16.77 74.27
35.65 32.00 Center 17.30 85.80 68.50 16.69 16.68 16.70 16.67 16.69 69.12 0.61 0.69 11.38 71.06
37.65 33.79 Center 17.20 84.90 67.70 16.65 16.67 16.66 16.64 16.66 68.25 0.55 0.61 12.84 70.75
-
22
3.3 THREE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST
Upon conclusion of the two-foot overtopping test, there was no observable contact loss or
deformation. The three-foot overtopping test initiated on November 21st, 2008. The system was
initially seasoned at a low flow rate. Subsequently, the flow over the system was increased
gradually to the three-foot overtopping depth, achieved at 50 cfs. Figure 3-4 is a photograph of
the three-foot overtopping test in progress.
Figure 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test in Progress
Initially, data were collected at the pre-established stations, and subsequently at the start
of every hour for the remainder of the test. Aerated water was observed beginning
approximately 20 ft downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test
section. Therefore, depth measurements beyond Station 20 should be considered approximate.
The test was conducted for the full 4 hrs as there was no observable system deformation during
the overtopping test. At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and
post-test bed elevations were recorded, confirming that the system had not exceeded the
performance threshold. Table 3-4 presents the three-foot overtopping test data.
-
23
Table 3-4. Three-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data
Tape
Station
(ft)
Horizontal
Station
(ft)
Position
ID
Pre-test
Bed
Reading
(ft)
Point-
gage
Survey
Elevation
(ft)
Bed
Elevation
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 1
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 2
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 3
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 4
(ft)
Water-
surface
Average
Reading
(ft)
Water-
surface
Elevation
(ft)
Depth
(ft)
Vertical
Depth
(ft)
Continuity
Velocity
(ft/s)
EGL
(Continuity)
(ft)
3.65 3.28 Center 17.22 99.92 82.70 16.30 16.30 16.30 16.29 16.30 83.62 0.92 1.03 13.55 86.38
5.65 5.07 Center 17.16 99.03 81.87 16.38 16.44 16.43 16.38 16.41 82.62 0.75 0.84 16.61 86.83
7.65 6.87 Center 17.24 98.16 80.92 16.50 16.57 16.55 16.49 16.53 81.63 0.71 0.79 17.54 86.34
9.65 8.66 Center 17.16 97.26 80.10 16.53 16.56 16.53 16.50 16.53 80.73 0.63 0.70 19.84 86.78
11.65 10.46 Center 17.09 96.38 79.29 16.45 16.47 16.47 16.46 16.46 79.92 0.63 0.70 19.92 86.01
13.65 12.25 Center 17.24 95.50 78.26 16.44 16.49 16.51 16.46 16.48 79.03 0.77 0.85 16.34 83.09
15.65 14.05 Center 17.16 94.60 77.44 16.50 16.56 16.54 16.53 16.53 78.07 0.63 0.70 19.92 84.16
17.65 15.84 Center 17.14 93.73 76.59 16.47 16.54 16.54 16.51 16.52 77.22 0.63 0.70 20.00 83.36
19.65 17.64 Center 17.18 92.86 75.68 16.38 16.49 16.47 16.48 16.46 76.41 0.72 0.81 17.24 80.95
21.65 19.43 Center 17.21 92.02 74.81 16.37 16.47 16.48 16.49 16.45 75.57 0.76 0.84 16.50 79.72
23.65 21.23 Center 17.03 91.09 74.06 16.40 16.46 16.45 16.45 16.44 74.65 0.59 0.66 21.19 81.56
25.65 23.02 Center 17.09 90.20 73.11 16.20 16.37 16.35 16.36 16.32 73.88 0.77 0.86 16.23 77.89
27.65 24.82 Center 17.04 89.35 72.31 16.13 16.30 16.32 16.33 16.27 73.08 0.77 0.86 16.23 77.09
29.65 26.61 Center 17.24 88.46 71.22 16.15 16.25 16.30 16.31 16.25 72.21 0.99 1.10 12.66 74.59
31.65 28.41 Center 17.24 87.57 70.33 16.16 16.37 16.37 16.37 16.32 71.25 0.92 1.03 13.55 74.01
33.65 30.20 Center 17.15 86.69 69.54 16.21 16.46 16.48 16.45 16.40 70.29 0.75 0.84 16.67 74.53
35.65 32.00 Center 17.28 85.80 68.52 16.28 16.44 16.40 16.41 16.38 69.42 0.90 1.00 13.93 72.34
37.65 33.79 Center 17.17 84.90 67.73 16.27 16.38 16.38 16.38 16.35 68.55 0.82 0.91 15.29 72.09
-
24
3.4 FOUR-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST
Upon conclusion of the three-foot overtopping test, there was no observable contact loss
or deformation. The four-foot overtopping test initiated on November 21st, 2008. The system
was initially seasoned at a low flow rate. Subsequently, the flow over the system was increased
gradually to the four-foot overtopping depth, achieved at 78 cfs. Figure 3-5 is a photograph of
the four-foot overtopping test in progress.
Figure 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test in Progress
-
25
Initially, data were collected at the pre-established stations, and subsequently at the start
of every hour for the remainder of the test. Aerated water was observed beginning
approximately 26 ft downstream of the crest and extended throughout the remainder of the test
section. Therefore, depth measurements beyond Station 26 should be considered approximate.
The test was conducted for the full 4 hrs as there was no observable system deformation during
the overtopping test. At the conclusion of the fourth hour, the discharge was terminated and
post-test bed elevations were recorded, confirming that the system had not exceeded the
performance threshold. Table 3-5 presents the four-foot overtopping test data.
-
26
Table 3-5. Four-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data
Tape
Station
(ft)
Horizontal
Station
(ft)
Position
ID
Pre-test
Bed
Reading
(ft)
Point-
gage
Survey
Elevation
(ft)
Bed
Elevation
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 1
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 2
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 3
(ft)
Water-
surface
Reading
hr 4
(ft)
Water-
surface
Average
Reading
(ft)
Water-
surface
Elevation
(ft)
Depth
(ft)
Vertical
Depth
(ft)
Continuity
Velocity
(ft/s)
EGL
(Continuity)
(ft)
3.65 3.28 Center 17.21 99.92 82.71 15.95 16.95 15.94 15.94 16.20 83.73 1.02 1.13 19.21 89.35
5.65 5.07 Center 17.14 99.03 81.89 16.08 16.04 16.05 16.06 16.06 82.97 1.08 1.21 18.01 87.90
7.65 6.87 Center 17.23 98.16 80.93 16.18 16.15 16.17 16.16 16.17 82.00 1.07 1.19 18.31 87.09
9.65 8.66 Center 17.18 97.26 80.08 16.18 16.17 16.18 16.18 16.18 81.08 1.00 1.12 19.45 86.85
11.65 10.46 Center 17.09 96.38 79.29 16.15 16.13 16.14 16.13 16.14 80.24 0.95 1.06 20.47 86.65
13.65 12.25 Center 17.26 95.50 78.24 16.19 16.17 16.18 16.19 16.18 79.32 1.08 1.20 18.10 84.29
15.65 14.05 Center 17.16 94.60 77.44 16.33 16.28 16.27 16.28 16.29 78.31 0.87 0.97 22.41 86.02
17.65 15.84 Center 17.11 93.73 76.62 16.32 16.28 16.28 16.29 16.29 77.44 0.82 0.91 23.85 86.19
19.65 17.64 Center 17.20 92.86 75.66 16.29 16.27 16.26 16.30 16.28 76.58 0.92 1.03 21.20 83.46
21.65 19.43 Center 17.23 92.02 74.79 16.29 16.27 16.26 16.27 16.27 75.75 0.96 1.07 20.37 82.09
23.65 21.23 Center 17.03 91.09 74.06 16.26 16.26 16.27 16.29 16.27 74.82 0.76 0.85 25.66 84.96
25.65 23.02 Center 17.16 90.20 73.04 16.20 16.20 16.20 16.22 16.21 74.00 0.95 1.06 20.42 80.37
27.65 24.82 Center 17.02 89.35 72.33 16.24 16.17 16.22 16.19 16.21 73.15 0.81 0.91 23.93 81.95
29.65 26.61 Center 17.25 88.46 71.21 16.18 16.26 16.26 16.23 16.23 72.23 1.02 1.13 19.16 77.83
31.65 28.41 Center 17.25 87.57 70.32 16.34 16.32 16.34 16.35 16.34 71.23 0.91 1.02 21.37 78.23
33.65 30.20 Center 17.13 86.69 69.56 16.34 16.27 16.32 16.28 16.30 70.39 0.83 0.92 23.56 78.93
35.65 32.00 Center 17.28 85.80 68.52 16.20 16.21 16.21 16.20 16.21 69.60 1.08 1.20 18.14 74.59
37.65 33.79 Center 17.20 84.90 67.70 16.11 16.10 16.15 16.13 16.12 68.78 1.08 1.20 18.10 73.75
-
27
3.5 FIVE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST
Upon conclusion of the four-foot overtopping test, there was no observable contact loss
or deformation. A maximum test was initiated on November 24th
, 2008. The system was
initially seasoned at a low flow rate for five minutes. Subsequently, the flow over the system
was increased until the maximum discharge available at the facility was reached. The recorded
discharge was 109.0 cfs, which corresponded to 5.0 feet of overtopping depth. Figure 3-6 is a
photograph of the 109.0 cfs test in progress.
Figure 3-6. Five-foot Overtopping Test in Progress
The test was conducted for a duration of 2 hours and two sets of water surface elevation
data were collected. Aerated water was observed beginning approximately 36 feet downstream
of the crest, and therefore, depth measurements beyond this location should be considered
approximate. After two hours the system became compromised, evident as loss of intimate
contact between the mattress and granular filter, and shutdown procedures were initiated.
Following shutdown, bed elevation data were recorded over the intact portions of the test section,
and the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was carefully removed from the facility. Table 3.6
presents the 109.0 cfs test data.
-
28
Table 3.6. Five-foot Overtopping Test Hydraulic Data
Tape
Station
Horizontal
Station Position
Pre-test
Bed
Reading
Point
Gage
Survey
Elevation
Bed
Elevation
Water
Surface
Reading
hr 1
Water
Surface
Reading
hr 2
Water
Surface
Average
Reading
Water
Surface
Elevation Depth
Vertical
Depth
Continuity
Velocity
EGL
(Continuity)
(ft) (ft) ID (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft)
3.65 3.28 Center 17.22 99.92 82.70 15.55 15.55 15.55 84.37 1.67 1.86 16.32 88.33
5.65 5.07 Center 17.18 99.03 81.85 15.78 15.74 15.76 83.27 1.42 1.58 19.19 88.84
7.65 6.87 Center 17.25 98.16 80.91 15.86 15.86 15.86 82.30 1.39 1.55 19.60 88.13
9.65 8.66 Center 17.20 97.26 80.06 15.91 15.91 15.91 81.35 1.29 1.44 21.12 88.15
11.65 10.46 Center 17.08 96.38 79.30 15.88 15.87 15.88 80.51 1.21 1.34 22.61 88.32
13.65 12.25 Center 17.26 95.50 78.24 15.90 15.90 15.90 79.60 1.36 1.52 20.04 85.69
15.65 14.05 Center 17.16 94.60 77.44 15.98 15.98 15.98 78.62 1.18 1.31 23.09 86.78
17.65 15.84 Center 17.09 93.73 76.64 15.99 15.99 15.99 77.74 1.10 1.23 24.77 87.16
19.65 17.64 Center 17.21 92.86 75.65 16.00 16.00 16.00 76.86 1.21 1.35 22.52 84.61
21.65 19.43 Center 17.26 92.02 74.76 16.03 16.04 16.04 75.99 1.22 1.36 22.24 83.54
23.65 21.23 Center 17.00 91.09 74.09 16.01 16.03 16.02 75.07 0.98 1.09 27.81 86.98
25.65 23.02 Center 17.16 90.20 73.04 15.99 15.99 15.99 74.21 1.17 1.30 23.29 82.51
27.65 24.82 Center 17.05 89.35 72.30 16.01 16.02 16.02 73.34 1.04 1.15 26.33 83.99
29.65 26.61 Center 17.13 88.46 71.33 16.10 16.08 16.09 72.37 1.04 1.16 26.20 82.92
31.65 28.41 Center 17.30 87.57 70.27 16.20 16.19 16.20 71.38 1.11 1.23 24.66 80.71
33.65 30.20 Center 17.11 86.69 69.58 16.15 16.12 16.14 70.56 0.98 1.09 27.95 82.58
35.65 32.00 Center 17.26 85.80 68.54 16.06 16.05 16.06 69.75 1.21 1.34 22.61 77.56
37.65 33.79 Center 17.14 84.90 67.76 16.02 16.03 16.03 68.88 1.11 1.24 24.44 78.04
-
29
3.6 POST-TESTING EVALUATION
Upon conclusion of the 109.0 cfs test, the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress was removed
from the flume in order to inspect the underlying subgrade embankment and rock drainage layer.
After inspection, it was determined that intimate contact had been lost over the lower 30 feet of
the test section, resulting in exceedance of the performance standard. Figure 3-7 presents
photographs of the embankment following the test series.
Figure 3-7. Embankment following Revetment System Removal
-
30
4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
Hydraulic analyses were conducted for Tests 1 through 5. For all tests, water-surface
profiles were evaluated using a standard step fore-water hydraulic model which computed the
best-fit Manning’s roughness for the collected data. The hydraulic model developed theoretical
water-surface profiles with varying Manning’s roughness values to determine the best-fit
Manning’s roughness for each profile. The best-fit Manning’s roughness was determined from
maximizing the coefficient of determination, R2. A plot of Manning’s n verses unit discharge is
presented as Figure 4-1.
0.032
0.034
0.036
0.038
0.040
0.042
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Unit Discharge (ft2/sec)
Man
nin
g's
n
Figure 4-1. Manning’s n verses Unit Discharge for Three-, Four-, and Five-foot
Overtopping Tests of Six-inch Triton Filter Mattress
-
31
Based on the developed best-fit profile, velocity and shear stress values were computed.
Appendix G provides the supporting data for the hydraulic analysis presented in this section.
Table 4-1 presents the unit discharge, maximum shear stress, maximum velocity, Manning’s n,
and system condition for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress for each overtopping test.
Table 4-1. Summary Hydraulics for Overtopping Test Series
Test
Number
Unit
Discharge
Maximum
Shear Stress
Maximum
Velocity
Manning's
n Condition
(ft2/sec) (psf) (fps)
1 2.8 * * * Stable
2 7.0 6.8 17.2 * Stable
3 12.5 16.1 19.3 0.039 Stable
4 19.5 21.5 22.6 0.040 Stable
5 27.3 24.9 26.2 0.038 Unstable
* Values not calculable due to the presence of aerated water over the majority of the revetment system
For this testing series, Tests 4 and 5 were considered to be critical in establishing stability
thresholds for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress. Therefore, because Test 4 was the final stable
test and Test 5 resulted in destabilization of the revetment system, detailed hydraulic analyses of
Tests 4 and 5 are presented below.
4.1 FOUR-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST
Water-surface profile data for the four-foot overtopping test were used with the standard
step fore-water hydraulic model to conduct the hydraulic analysis. The Manning’s roughness
coefficient was determined to be 0.040 using the hydraulic model. Figure 4-2 provides a
graphical comparison of the measured flow depth data to the model output flow depth data.
Furthermore, Figure 4-3 presents the theoretical water-surface profile and energy grade line for
the model profile.
-
32
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
Station (ft)
Vert
ical D
ep
th (
ft)
Measured Data
Model Data
Figure 4-2. Four-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model Flow
Depth Data
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
Station (ft)
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Bed
Water Surface Elevation
Energy Grade Line
Figure 4-3. Four-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.040
-
33
Flow velocities and boundary shear stresses were computed at each station for the model
profile. The continuity equation was used to compute flow velocities and boundary shear
stresses were computed using the momentum equation. Figure 4-4 provides a graph of velocity
and shear stress versus horizontal station for the four-foot overtopping test. The highest flow
velocity and boundary shear stress at the downstream end of the test section were determined to
be 22.6 ft/s and 21.5 psf, respectively.
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
Station (ft)
Velo
cit
y (
ft/s
)
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
Sh
ear
Str
ess (
psf)
Velocity
Momentum
Shear Stress
Figure 4-4. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Four-foot Overtopping Test
4.2 FIVE-FOOT OVERTOPPING TEST
Water-surface profile data for the five-foot overtopping test were used with the standard
step fore-water hydraulic model to conduct the hydraulic analysis. The Manning’s roughness
coefficient was determined to be 0.038 using the hydraulic model.
-
34
Figure 4-5 provides a graphical comparison of the measured flow depth data to the model
output flow depth data. Furthermore, Figure 4-6 presents the theoretical water-surface profile
and energy grade line for the model profile.
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00
Station (ft)
Vert
ical D
ep
th (
ft)
Measured Data
Model Data
Figure 4-5. Five-foot Overtopping Measured Flow Depth Data Compared to Model Flow
Depth Data
-
35
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00
Station (ft)
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Bed
Water Surface Elevation
Energy Grade Line
Figure 4-6. Five-foot Overtopping Water-surface Profile Fit, Manning’s n = 0.038
Flow velocities and boundary shear stresses were computed at each station for the model
profile. The continuity equation was used to compute flow velocities and boundary shear
stresses were computed using the momentum equation. Figure 4-7 provides a graph of velocity
and shear stress versus horizontal station for the five-foot overtopping test. The highest flow
velocity and boundary shear stress at the downstream end of the test section were determined to
be 26.2 ft/s and 24.9 psf, respectively. However, these values for velocity and shear stress reflect
the threshold exceedance for the six-inch Triton Filter Mattress, and represent a point at which
system instability was observed.
-
36
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00
Station (ft)
Velo
cit
y (
ft/s
)
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Sh
ear
Str
ess (
psf)
Velocity
Momentum Shear Stress
Figure 4-7. Flow Velocity and Boundary Shear Stress for Five-foot Overtopping Test
-
37
5 SUMMARY
During the fall of 2008, hydraulic performance testing of the six-inch Triton Filter
Mattress was conducted by Colorado State University. Testing was performed at the Hydraulics
Laboratory located at the Engineering Research Center. Descriptions of the revetment
installation, test facility, test program, test matrix, and resulting database are presented in this
report. In addition, a preliminary hydraulic analysis was conducted, which identified the largest
shear stress and velocity maintained within the test section. From this analysis, the revetment
system was determined to be stable for velocities and shear stresses up to 22.6 ft/s and 21.5 psf,
respectively. For velocities and shear stress values of 26.2 ft/s and 24.9 psf, respectively, the
revetment system was determined to be unstable. This report provides data from the hydraulic
testing of a full-scale revetment system under controlled laboratory conditions for purposes of
identifying stability threshold conditions.
-
38
REFERENCES
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. D422, developed by
Subcommittee D18.03 of the American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using
Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m
3)). D1557, developed by Subcommittee
D18.03 of the American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil
Classification System). D2487, developed by Subcommittee D18.07 of the American
Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Density of Soil and Soil-aggregate in Place by Nuclear
Methods (Shallow Depth). D2922, developed by Subcommittee D18.08 of the American
Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Water Content of Soil and Rock in Place by Nuclear Methods
(Shallow Depth). D3017, developed by Subcommittee D18.08 of the American Society
for Testing and Materials.
ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils.
D4318, developed by Subcommittee D18.03 of the American Society for Testing and
Materials.
-
39
APPENDIX A SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
-
40
3-in 2-in 1-in 0.5-in 4 8 704010 16 20 100 140 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.00010.0010.010.1110100Grain Size in millimeters
Pe
rce
nt
Fin
er
by
We
igh
t -
%
Figure A-1. Sub-grade Grain Size Distribution
-
41
APPENDIX B COMPACTION VERIFICATION
-
42
Figure B-1. Compaction Verification for Soil Embankment
-
43
APPENDIX C FILTER MATERIAL GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
-
44
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.010.1110100
Particle Diameter (mm)
Perc
en
t F
iner
(%)
Figure C-1. Pea Gravel Filter Material Grain-size Distribution Curve
-
45
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.00010.0010.010.11101001000
Particle Diameter (mm)
Pe
rcen
t F
iner
(%)
Figure C-2. Angular Rock Grain-size Distribution Curve
D84 =30.7 mm D50 = 26.9 mm D16 = 19.1 mm
-
46
APPENDIX D PRODUCT INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS
-
47
-
48
Figure D-1. Product Construction and Installation Instructions
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
APPENDIX E GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR STONE INFILL
-
54
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.1110
Particle Size (inches)
Perc
en
t F
iner
Th
an
Figure E-1. Grain-size Distribution for Stone Infill
-
55
APPENDIX F FILTER FABRIC PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
-
56
Figure F-1. Product Data Sheet for Mirafi 180N
-
57
APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS DATA
-
58
Table G-1. Four-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress
Analysis
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface Elevation
(ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
5.07 81.87 83.07 1.21 1.08 18.02 87.88 n/a n/a
5.17 81.82 83.02 1.20 1.08 18.07 87.86 n/a n/a
5.27 81.77 82.97 1.20 1.08 18.13 87.84 0.21 12.85
5.37 81.72 82.91 1.20 1.07 18.18 87.82 0.22 12.94
5.47 81.67 82.86 1.19 1.07 18.24 87.80 0.22 13.03
5.57 81.62 82.81 1.19 1.07 18.29 87.77 0.22 13.11
5.67 81.57 82.76 1.18 1.06 18.34 87.75 0.22 13.20
5.77 81.52 82.70 1.18 1.06 18.39 87.73 0.22 13.29
5.87 81.47 82.65 1.18 1.06 18.44 87.71 0.23 13.38
5.97 81.42 82.60 1.18 1.05 18.49 87.69 0.23 13.46
6.07 81.37 82.55 1.17 1.05 18.54 87.66 0.23 13.55
6.17 81.32 82.49 1.17 1.05 18.59 87.64 0.23 13.63
6.27 81.28 82.44 1.17 1.05 18.64 87.62 0.23 13.72
6.37 81.23 82.39 1.16 1.04 18.69 87.59 0.24 13.80
6.47 81.18 82.34 1.16 1.04 18.74 87.57 0.24 13.89
6.57 81.13 82.28 1.16 1.04 18.79 87.54 0.24 13.97
6.67 81.08 82.23 1.15 1.04 18.83 87.52 0.24 14.05
6.77 81.03 82.18 1.15 1.03 18.88 87.50 0.24 14.13
6.87 80.98 82.13 1.15 1.03 18.92 87.47 0.25 14.21
6.97 80.93 82.08 1.15 1.03 18.97 87.45 0.25 14.29
7.07 80.88 82.02 1.14 1.03 19.01 87.42 0.25 14.37
7.17 80.83 81.97 1.14 1.02 19.06 87.40 0.25 14.45
7.27 80.78 81.92 1.14 1.02 19.10 87.37 0.25 14.53
7.37 80.73 81.87 1.14 1.02 19.14 87.34 0.26 14.60
7.47 80.69 81.82 1.13 1.02 19.19 87.32 0.26 14.68
7.57 80.64 81.77 1.13 1.01 19.23 87.29 0.26 14.76
7.67 80.59 81.71 1.13 1.01 19.27 87.27 0.26 14.83
7.77 80.54 81.66 1.13 1.01 19.31 87.24 0.26 14.91
7.87 80.49 81.61 1.12 1.01 19.35 87.21 0.27 14.98
7.97 80.44 81.56 1.12 1.01 19.39 87.19 0.27 15.05
8.07 80.39 81.51 1.12 1.00 19.43 87.16 0.27 15.13
8.17 80.34 81.46 1.12 1.00 19.47 87.13 0.27 15.20
8.27 80.29 81.41 1.11 1.00 19.51 87.11 0.27 15.27
8.37 80.24 81.35 1.11 1.00 19.55 87.08 0.27 15.34
8.47 80.19 81.30 1.11 1.00 19.59 87.05 0.28 15.41
8.57 80.14 81.25 1.11 0.99 19.63 87.02 0.28 15.48
8.67 80.09 81.20 1.11 0.99 19.67 87.00 0.28 15.55
8.77 80.05 81.15 1.10 0.99 19.70 86.97 0.28 15.62
8.87 80.00 81.10 1.10 0.99 19.74 86.94 0.28 15.69
8.97 79.95 81.05 1.10 0.99 19.78 86.91 0.29 15.76
9.07 79.90 81.00 1.10 0.98 19.81 86.88 0.29 15.83
9.17 79.85 80.94 1.09 0.98 19.85 86.85 0.29 15.89
9.27 79.80 80.89 1.09 0.98 19.88 86.82 0.29 15.96
9.37 79.75 80.84 1.09 0.98 19.92 86.79 0.29 16.03
-
59
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface Elevation
(ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
9.47 79.70 80.79 1.09 0.98 19.95 86.77 0.29 16.09
9.57 79.65 80.74 1.09 0.98 19.99 86.74 0.30 16.15
9.67 79.60 80.69 1.09 0.97 20.02 86.71 0.30 16.22
9.77 79.55 80.64 1.08 0.97 20.05 86.68 0.30 16.28
9.87 79.50 80.59 1.08 0.97 20.09 86.65 0.30 16.35
9.97 79.46 80.54 1.08 0.97 20.12 86.62 0.30 16.41
10.07 79.41 80.48 1.08 0.97 20.15 86.59 0.30 16.47
10.17 79.36 80.43 1.08 0.97 20.18 86.55 0.31 16.53
10.27 79.31 80.38 1.08 0.96 20.21 86.52 0.31 16.59
10.37 79.26 80.33 1.07 0.96 20.24 86.49 0.31 16.65
10.47 79.21 80.28 1.07 0.96 20.28 86.46 0.31 16.71
10.57 79.16 80.23 1.07 0.96 20.31 86.43 0.31 16.77
10.67 79.11 80.18 1.07 0.96 20.34 86.40 0.31 16.83
10.77 79.06 80.13 1.07 0.96 20.37 86.37 0.31 16.89
10.87 79.01 80.08 1.07 0.96 20.40 86.34 0.32 16.95
10.97 78.96 80.03 1.06 0.95 20.43 86.30 0.32 17.00
11.07 78.91 79.98 1.06 0.95 20.45 86.27 0.32 17.06
11.17 78.87 79.93 1.06 0.95 20.48 86.24 0.32 17.12
11.27 78.82 79.88 1.06 0.95 20.51 86.21 0.32 17.17
11.37 78.77 79.82 1.06 0.95 20.54 86.18 0.32 17.23
11.47 78.72 79.77 1.06 0.95 20.57 86.14 0.33 17.28
11.57 78.67 79.72 1.06 0.95 20.60 86.11 0.33 17.34
11.67 78.62 79.67 1.05 0.95 20.62 86.08 0.33 17.39
11.77 78.57 79.62 1.05 0.94 20.65 86.05 0.33 17.44
11.87 78.52 79.57 1.05 0.94 20.68 86.01 0.33 17.50
11.97 78.47 79.52 1.05 0.94 20.70 85.98 0.33 17.55
12.07 78.42 79.47 1.05 0.94 20.73 85.95 0.33 17.60
12.17 78.37 79.42 1.05 0.94 20.75 85.91 0.34 17.65
12.27 78.32 79.37 1.05 0.94 20.78 85.88 0.34 17.71
12.37 78.28 79.32 1.04 0.94 20.81 85.84 0.34 17.76
12.47 78.23 79.27 1.04 0.94 20.83 85.81 0.34 17.81
12.57 78.18 79.22 1.04 0.93 20.86 85.78 0.34 17.86
12.67 78.13 79.17 1.04 0.93 20.88 85.74 0.34 17.91
12.77 78.08 79.12 1.04 0.93 20.90 85.71 0.34 17.96
12.87 78.03 79.07 1.04 0.93 20.93 85.67 0.34 18.00
12.97 77.98 79.02 1.04 0.93 20.95 85.64 0.35 18.05
13.07 77.93 78.97 1.04 0.93 20.98 85.60 0.35 18.10
13.17 77.88 78.92 1.03 0.93 21.00 85.57 0.35 18.15
13.27 77.83 78.87 1.03 0.93 21.02 85.53 0.35 18.19
13.37 77.78 78.82 1.03 0.93 21.05 85.50 0.35 18.24
13.47 77.73 78.77 1.03 0.93 21.07 85.46 0.35 18.29
13.57 77.69 78.72 1.03 0.92 21.09 85.43 0.35 18.33
13.67 77.64 78.67 1.03 0.92 21.11 85.39 0.36 18.38
13.77 77.59 78.61 1.03 0.92 21.13 85.36 0.36 18.42
13.87 77.54 78.56 1.03 0.92 21.16 85.32 0.36 18.47
13.97 77.49 78.51 1.03 0.92 21.18 85.29 0.36 18.51
14.07 77.44 78.46 1.03 0.92 21.20 85.25 0.36 18.55
-
60
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface Elevation
(ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
14.17 77.39 78.41 1.02 0.92 21.22 85.21 0.36 18.60
14.27 77.34 78.36 1.02 0.92 21.24 85.18 0.36 18.64
14.37 77.29 78.31 1.02 0.92 21.26 85.14 0.36 18.68
14.47 77.24 78.26 1.02 0.92 21.28 85.10 0.36 18.73
14.57 77.19 78.21 1.02 0.92 21.30 85.07 0.37 18.77
14.67 77.14 78.16 1.02 0.91 21.32 85.03 0.37 18.81
14.77 77.09 78.11 1.02 0.91 21.34 84.99 0.37 18.85
14.87 77.05 78.06 1.02 0.91 21.36 84.96 0.37 18.89
14.97 77.00 78.01 1.02 0.91 21.38 84.92 0.37 18.93
15.07 76.95 77.96 1.02 0.91 21.40 84.88 0.37 18.97
15.17 76.90 77.91 1.01 0.91 21.42 84.85 0.37 19.01
15.27 76.85 77.86 1.01 0.91 21.44 84.81 0.37 19.05
15.37 76.80 77.81 1.01 0.91 21.46 84.77 0.37 19.09
15.47 76.75 77.76 1.01 0.91 21.48 84.73 0.38 19.13
15.57 76.70 77.71 1.01 0.91 21.49 84.70 0.38 19.16
15.67 76.65 77.66 1.01 0.91 21.51 84.66 0.38 19.20
15.77 76.60 77.61 1.01 0.91 21.53 84.62 0.38 19.24
15.87 76.55 77.56 1.01 0.91 21.55 84.58 0.38 19.28
15.97 76.50 77.51 1.01 0.90 21.56 84.54 0.38 19.31
16.07 76.46 77.46 1.01 0.90 21.58 84.51 0.38 19.35
16.17 76.41 77.41 1.01 0.90 21.60 84.47 0.38 19.38
16.27 76.36 77.36 1.01 0.90 21.62 84.43 0.38 19.42
16.37 76.31 77.31 1.00 0.90 21.63 84.39 0.39 19.46
16.47 76.26 77.26 1.00 0.90 21.65 84.35 0.39 19.49
16.57 76.21 77.21 1.00 0.90 21.67 84.31 0.39 19.53
16.67 76.16 77.16 1.00 0.90 21.68 84.27 0.39 19.56
16.77 76.11 77.11 1.00 0.90 21.70 84.23 0.39 19.59
16.87 76.06 77.06 1.00 0.90 21.71 84.20 0.39 19.63
16.97 76.01 77.01 1.00 0.90 21.73 84.16 0.39 19.66
17.07 75.96 76.96 1.00 0.90 21.75 84.12 0.39 19.70
17.17 75.91 76.91 1.00 0.90 21.76 84.08 0.39 19.73
17.27 75.87 76.86 1.00 0.90 21.78 84.04 0.39 19.76
17.37 75.82 76.81 1.00 0.89 21.79 84.00 0.39 19.79
17.47 75.77 76.76 1.00 0.89 21.81 83.96 0.40 19.82
17.57 75.72 76.71 1.00 0.89 21.82 83.92 0.40 19.86
17.67 75.67 76.66 1.00 0.89 21.84 83.88 0.40 19.89
17.77 75.62 76.61 0.99 0.89 21.85 83.84 0.40 19.92
17.87 75.57 76.56 0.99 0.89 21.86 83.80 0.40 19.95
17.97 75.52 76.51 0.99 0.89 21.88 83.76 0.40 19.98
18.07 75.47 76.46 0.99 0.89 21.89 83.72 0.40 20.01
18.17 75.42 76.41 0.99 0.89 21.91 83.68 0.40 20.04
18.27 75.37 76.36 0.99 0.89 21.92 83.64 0.40 20.07
18.37 75.32 76.31 0.99 0.89 21.93 83.60 0.40 20.10
18.47 75.27 76.27 0.99 0.89 21.95 83.56 0.40 20.13
18.57 75.23 76.22 0.99 0.89 21.96 83.52 0.41 20.16
18.67 75.18 76.17 0.99 0.89 21.97 83.48 0.41 20.19
18.77 75.13 76.12 0.99 0.89 21.99 83.44 0.41 20.21
-
61
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface Elevation
(ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
18.87 75.08 76.07 0.99 0.89 22.00 83.40 0.41 20.24
18.97 75.03 76.02 0.99 0.89 22.01 83.36 0.41 20.27
19.07 74.98 75.97 0.99 0.89 22.03 83.31 0.41 20.30
19.17 74.93 75.92 0.99 0.88 22.04 83.27 0.41 20.32
19.27 74.88 75.87 0.99 0.88 22.05 83.23 0.41 20.35
19.37 74.83 75.82 0.98 0.88 22.06 83.19 0.41 20.38
19.47 74.78 75.77 0.98 0.88 22.08 83.15 0.41 20.40
19.57 74.73 75.72 0.98 0.88 22.09 83.11 0.41 20.43
19.67 74.68 75.67 0.98 0.88 22.10 83.07 0.41 20.46
19.77 74.64 75.62 0.98 0.88 22.11 83.03 0.41 20.48
19.87 74.59 75.57 0.98 0.88 22.12 82.98 0.42 20.51
19.97 74.54 75.52 0.98 0.88 22.13 82.94 0.42 20.53
20.07 74.49 75.47 0.98 0.88 22.15 82.90 0.42 20.56
20.17 74.44 75.42 0.98 0.88 22.16 82.86 0.42 20.58
20.27 74.39 75.37 0.98 0.88 22.17 82.82 0.42 20.61
20.37 74.34 75.32 0.98 0.88 22.18 82.78 0.42 20.63
20.47 74.29 75.27 0.98 0.88 22.19 82.73 0.42 20.66
20.57 74.24 75.22 0.98 0.88 22.20 82.69 0.42 20.68
20.67 74.19 75.17 0.98 0.88 22.21 82.65 0.42 20.70
20.77 74.14 75.12 0.98 0.88 22.22 82.61 0.42 20.73
20.87 74.09 75.07 0.98 0.88 22.23 82.57 0.42 20.75
20.97 74.05 75.02 0.98 0.88 22.24 82.52 0.42 20.77
21.07 74.00 74.97 0.98 0.88 22.26 82.48 0.42 20.80
21.17 73.95 74.92 0.98 0.88 22.27 82.44 0.42 20.82
21.27 73.90 74.87 0.98 0.88 22.28 82.40 0.43 20.84
21.37 73.85 74.82 0.98 0.88 22.29 82.35 0.43 20.86
21.47 73.80 74.77 0.97 0.87 22.30 82.31 0.43 20.88
21.57 73.75 74.72 0.97 0.87 22.31 82.27 0.43 20.91
21.67 73.70 74.67 0.97 0.87 22.32 82.22 0.43 20.93
21.77 73.65 74.62 0.97 0.87 22.32 82.18 0.43 20.95
21.87 73.60 74.58 0.97 0.87 22.33 82.14 0.43 20.97
21.97 73.55 74.53 0.97 0.87 22.34 82.10 0.43 20.99
22.07 73.50 74.48 0.97 0.87 22.35 82.05 0.43 21.01
22.17 73.45 74.43 0.97 0.87 22.36 82.01 0.43 21.03
22.27 73.41 74.38 0.97 0.87 22.37 81.97 0.43 21.05
22.37 73.36 74.33 0.97 0.87 22.38 81.92 0.43 21.07
22.47 73.31 74.28 0.97 0.87 22.39 81.88 0.43 21.09
22.57 73.26 74.23 0.97 0.87 22.40 81.84 0.43 21.11
22.67 73.21 74.18 0.97 0.87 22.41 81.79 0.43 21.13
22.77 73.16 74.13 0.97 0.87 22.42 81.75 0.43 21.15
22.87 73.11 74.08 0.97 0.87 22.42 81.71 0.43 21.17
22.97 73.06 74.03 0.97 0.87 22.43 81.66 0.44 21.19
23.07 73.01 73.98 0.97 0.87 22.44 81.62 0.44 21.21
23.17 72.96 73.93 0.97 0.87 22.45 81.58 0.44 21.23
23.27 72.91 73.88 0.97 0.87 22.46 81.53 0.44 21.24
23.37 72.86 73.83 0.97 0.87 22.47 81.49 0.44 21.26
23.47 72.82 73.78 0.97 0.87 22.47 81.44 0.44 21.28
-
62
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface Elevation
(ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
23.57 72.77 73.73 0.97 0.87 22.48 81.40 0.44 21.30
23.67 72.72 73.68 0.97 0.87 22.49 81.36 0.44 21.32
23.77 72.67 73.63 0.97 0.87 22.50 81.31 0.44 21.33
23.87 72.62 73.58 0.97 0.87 22.51 81.27 0.44 21.35
23.97 72.57 73.53 0.97 0.87 22.51 81.22 0.44 21.37
24.07 72.52 73.48 0.96 0.87 22.52 81.18 0.44 21.39
24.17 72.47 73.43 0.96 0.87 22.53 81.14 0.44 21.40
24.27 72.42 73.39 0.96 0.87 22.54 81.09 0.44 21.42
24.37 72.37 73.34 0.96 0.86 22.54 81.05 0.44 21.44
24.47 72.32 73.29 0.96 0.86 22.55 81.00 0.44 21.45
24.57 72.27 73.24 0.96 0.86 22.56 80.96 0.44 21.47
24.67 72.22 73.19 0.96 0.86 22.57 80.91 0.44 21.48
24.77 72.18 73.14 0.96 0.86 22.57 80.87 0.44 21.50
-
63
Table G-2. Five-foot Overtopping Test Regression Data for Velocity and Shear Stress
Analysis
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface
Elevation (ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
3.28 82.73 84.59 1.86 1.67 16.31 88.36 n/a n/a
3.38 82.68 84.53 1.85 1.66 16.41 88.35 n/a n/a
3.48 82.63 84.47 1.84 1.65 16.50 88.34 0.09 8.41
3.58 82.58 84.41 1.83 1.64 16.59 88.33 0.09 8.52
3.68 82.53 84.35 1.82 1.63 16.69 88.32 0.09 8.64
3.78 82.48 84.29 1.81 1.62 16.78 88.31 0.10 8.75
3.88 82.43 84.23 1.80 1.62 16.87 88.30 0.10 8.86
3.98 82.38 84.17 1.79 1.61 16.96 88.29 0.10 8.97
4.08 82.33 84.11 1.78 1.60 17.04 88.28 0.10 9.08
4.18 82.28 84.06 1.77 1.59 17.13 88.27 0.10 9.19
4.28 82.24 84.00 1.76 1.58 17.22 88.26 0.10 9.30
4.38 82.19 83.94 1.75 1.58 17.30 88.25 0.11 9.40
4.48 82.14 83.88 1.75 1.57 17.38 88.24 0.11 9.51
4.58 82.09 83.83 1.74 1.56 17.47 88.23 0.11 9.62
4.68 82.04 83.77 1.73 1.55 17.55 88.22 0.11 9.72
4.78 81.99 83.71 1.72 1.55 17.63 88.21 0.11 9.83
4.88 81.94 83.66 1.71 1.54 17.71 88.20 0.12 9.93
4.98 81.89 83.60 1.71 1.53 17.79 88.19 0.12 10.04
5.08 81.84 83.54 1.70 1.53 17.86 88.17 0.12 10.14
5.18 81.79 83.49 1.69 1.52 17.94 88.16 0.12 10.24
5.28 81.75 83.43 1.68 1.51 18.02 88.15 0.12 10.35
5.38 81.70 83.37 1.68 1.51 18.09 88.14 0.12 10.45
5.48 81.65 83.32 1.67 1.50 18.17 88.12 0.13 10.55
5.58 81.60 83.26 1.66 1.49 18.24 88.11 0.13 10.65
5.68 81.55 83.21 1.66 1.49 18.31 88.10 0.13 10.75
5.78 81.50 83.15 1.65 1.48 18.39 88.09 0.13 10.85
5.88 81.45 83.10 1.64 1.48 18.46 88.07 0.13 10.95
5.98 81.40 83.04 1.64 1.47 18.53 88.06 0.13 11.05
6.08 81.35 82.98 1.63 1.47 18.60 88.05 0.14 11.15
6.18 81.30 82.93 1.63 1.46 18.67 88.03 0.14 11.25
6.28 81.26 82.87 1.62 1.45 18.74 88.02 0.14 11.35
6.38 81.21 82.82 1.61 1.45 18.81 88.00 0.14 11.44
6.48 81.16 82.77 1.61 1.44 18.87 87.99 0.14 11.54
6.58 81.11 82.71 1.60 1.44 18.94 87.98 0.14 11.64
6.68 81.06 82.66 1.60 1.43 19.01 87.96 0.15 11.73
6.78 81.01 82.60 1.59 1.43 19.07 87.95 0.15 11.83
6.88 80.96 82.55 1.59 1.42 19.14 87.93 0.15 11.92
6.98 80.91 82.49 1.58 1.42 19.20 87.92 0.15 12.02
7.08 80.86 82.44 1.58 1.41 19.26 87.90 0.15 12.11
7.18 80.81 82.38 1.57 1.41 19.33 87.89 0.15 12.20
7.28 80.77 82.33 1.57 1.41 19.39 87.87 0.16 12.29
7.38 80.72 82.28 1.56 1.40 19.45 87.85 0.16 12.39
7.48 80.67 82.22 1.56 1.40 19.51 87.84 0.16 12.48
7.58 80.62 82.17 1.55 1.39 19.57 87.82 0.16 12.57
-
64
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface
Elevation (ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
7.68 80.57 82.11 1.55 1.39 19.63 87.81 0.16 12.66
7.78 80.52 82.06 1.54 1.38 19.69 87.79 0.16 12.75
7.88 80.47 82.01 1.54 1.38 19.75 87.77 0.17 12.84
7.98 80.42 81.95 1.53 1.38 19.81 87.76 0.17 12.93
8.08 80.37 81.90 1.53 1.37 19.87 87.74 0.17 13.02
8.18 80.32 81.85 1.52 1.37 19.92 87.72 0.17 13.11
8.28 80.28 81.79 1.52 1.36 19.98 87.70 0.17 13.19
8.38 80.23 81.74 1.51 1.36 20.04 87.69 0.17 13.28
8.48 80.18 81.69 1.51 1.36 20.09 87.67 0.18 13.37
8.58 80.13 81.63 1.51 1.35 20.15 87.65 0.18 13.46
8.68 80.08 81.58 1.50 1.35 20.20 87.63 0.18 13.54
8.78 80.03 81.53 1.50 1.35 20.26 87.62 0.18 13.63
8.88 79.98 81.48 1.49 1.34 20.31 87.60 0.18 13.71
8.98 79.93 81.42 1.49 1.34 20.36 87.58 0.18 13.80
9.08 79.88 81.37 1.49 1.33 20.42 87.56 0.19 13.88
9.18 79.83 81.32 1.48 1.33 20.47 87.54 0.19 13.97
9.28 79.78 81.26 1.48 1.33 20.52 87.52 0.19 14.05
9.38 79.74 81.21 1.48 1.32 20.57 87.50 0.19 14.13
9.48 79.69 81.16 1.47 1.32 20.62 87.48 0.19 14.22
9.58 79.64 81.11 1.47 1.32 20.68 87.47 0.19 14.30
9.68 79.59 81.05 1.46 1.31 20.73 87.45 0.20 14.38
9.78 79.54 81.00 1.46 1.31 20.78 87.43 0.20 14.46
9.88 79.49 80.95 1.46 1.31 20.83 87.41 0.20 14.54
9.98 79.44 80.90 1.45 1.31 20.87 87.39 0.20 14.62
10.08 79.39 80.84 1.45 1.30 20.92 87.37 0.20 14.70
10.18 79.34 80.79 1.45 1.30 20.97 87.35 0.20 14.78
10.28 79.29 80.74 1.44 1.30 21.02 87.33 0.20 14.86
10.38 79.25 80.69 1.44 1.29 21.07 87.31 0.21 14.94
10.48 79.20 80.63 1.44 1.29 21.11 87.28 0.21 15.02
10.58 79.15 80.58 1.43 1.29 21.16 87.26 0.21 15.10
10.68 79.10 80.53 1.43 1.28 21.21 87.24 0.21 15.17
10.78 79.05 80.48 1.43 1.28 21.25 87.22 0.21 15.25
10.88 79.00 80.43 1.42 1.28 21.30 87.20 0.21 15.33
10.98 78.95 80.37 1.42 1.28 21.34 87.18 0.22 15.41
11.08 78.90 80.32 1.42 1.27 21.39 87.16 0.22 15.48
11.18 78.85 80.27 1.42 1.27 21.43 87.13 0.22 15.56
11.28 78.80 80.22 1.41 1.27 21.48 87.11 0.22 15.63
11.38 78.76 80.17 1.41 1.27 21.52 87.09 0.22 15.71
11.48 78.71 80.11 1.41 1.26 21.56 87.07 0.22 15.78
11.58 78.66 80.06 1.40 1.26 21.61 87.05 0.22 15.85
11.68 78.61 80.01 1.40 1.26 21.65 87.02 0.23 15.93
11.78 78.56 79.96 1.40 1.26 21.69 87.00 0.23 16.00
11.88 78.51 79.91 1.40 1.25 21.73 86.98 0.23 16.07
11.98 78.46 79.86 1.39 1.25 21.77 86.95 0.23 16.15
12.08 78.41 79.80 1.39 1.25 21.82 86.93 0.23 16.22
12.18 78.36 79.75 1.39 1.25 21.86 86.91 0.23 16.29
-
65
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface
Elevation (ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
12.28 78.31 79.70 1.39 1.24 21.90 86.88 0.23 16.36
12.38 78.27 79.65 1.38 1.24 21.94 86.86 0.24 16.43
12.48 78.22 79.60 1.38 1.24 21.98 86.84 0.24 16.50
12.58 78.17 79.55 1.38 1.24 22.02 86.81 0.24 16.57
12.68 78.12 79.49 1.38 1.24 22.06 86.79 0.24 16.64
12.78 78.07 79.44 1.37 1.23 22.10 86.77 0.24 16.71
12.88 78.02 79.39 1.37 1.23 22.13 86.74 0.24 16.78
12.98 77.97 79.34 1.37 1.23 22.17 86.72 0.24 16.85
13.08 77.92 79.29 1.37 1.23 22.21 86.69 0.25 16.92
13.18 77.87 79.24 1.36 1.22 22.25 86.67 0.25 16.98
13.28 77.82 79.19 1.36 1.22 22.29 86.64 0.25 17.05
13.38 77.78 79.14 1.36 1.22 22.32 86.62 0.25 17.12
13.48 77.73 79.08 1.36 1.22 22.36 86.59 0.25 17.19
13.58 77.68 79.03 1.35 1.22 22.40 86.57 0.25 17.25
13.68 77.63 78.98 1.35 1.21 22.43 86.54 0.25 17.32
13.78 77.58 78.93 1.35 1.21 22.47 86.52 0.26 17.38
13.88 77.53 78.88 1.35 1.21 22.51 86.49 0.26 17.45
13.98 77.48 78.83 1.35 1.21 22.54 86.46 0.26 17.51
14.08 77.43 78.78 1.34 1.21 22.58 86.44 0.26 17.58
14.18 77.38 78.73 1.34 1.21 22.61 86.41 0.26 17.64
14.28 77.33 78.67 1.34 1.20 22.65 86.39 0.26 17.70
14.38 77.29 78.62 1.34 1.20 22.68 86.36 0.26 17.77
14.48 77.24 78.57 1.34 1.20 22.72 86.33 0.27 17.83
14.58 77.19 78.52 1.33 1.20 22.75 86.31 0.27 17.89
14.68 77.14 78.47 1.33 1.20 22.78 86.28 0.27 17.96
14.78 77.09 78.42 1.33 1.19 22.82 86.25 0.27 18.02
14.88 77.04 78.37 1.33 1.19 22.85 86.23 0.27 18.08
14.98 76.99 78.32 1.33 1.19 22.88 86.20 0.27 18.14
15.08 76.94 78.27 1.32 1.19 22.91 86.17 0.27 18.20
15.18 76.89 78.22 1.32 1.19 22.95 86.14 0.27 18.26
15.28 76.84 78.17 1.32 1.19 22.98 86.12 0.28 18.32
15.38 76.80 78.11 1.32 1.18 23.01 86.09 0.28 18.38
15.48 76.75 78.06 1.32 1.18 23.04 86.06 0.28 18.44
15.58 76.70 78.01 1.32 1.18 23.07 86.03 0.28 18.50
15.68 76.65 77.96 1.31 1.18 23.11 86.01 0.28 18.56
15.78 76.60 77.91 1.31 1.18 23.14 85.98 0.28 18.62
15.88 76.55 77.86 1.31 1.18 23.17 85.95 0.28 18.67
15.98 76.50 77.81 1.31 1.17 23.20 85.92 0.28 18.73
16.08 76.45 77.76 1.31 1.17 23.23 85.89 0.29 18.79
16.18 76.40 77.71 1.30 1.17 23.26 85.86 0.29 18.84
16.28 76.35 77.66 1.30 1.17 23.29 85.83 0.29 18.90
16.38 76.31 77.61 1.30 1.17 23.32 85.81 0.29 18.96
16.48 76.26 77.56 1.30 1.17 23.35 85.78 0.29 19.01
16.58 76.21 77.51 1.30 1.17 23.38 85.75 0.29 19.07
16.68 76.16 77.46 1.30 1.16 23.40 85.72 0.29 19.13
16.78 76.11 77.40 1.30 1.16 23.43 85.69 0.29 19.18
-
66
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface
Elevation (ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
16.88 76.06 77.35 1.29 1.16 23.46 85.66 0.30 19.23
16.98 76.01 77.30 1.29 1.16 23.49 85.63 0.30 19.29
17.08 75.96 77.25 1.29 1.16 23.52 85.60 0.30 19.34
17.18 75.91 77.20 1.29 1.16 23.55 85.57 0.30 19.40
17.28 75.86 77.15 1.29 1.16 23.57 85.54 0.30 19.45
17.38 75.82 77.10 1.29 1.15 23.60 85.51 0.30 19.50
17.48 75.77 77.05 1.28 1.15 23.63 85.48 0.30 19.56
17.58 75.72 77.00 1.28 1.15 23.65 85.45 0.30 19.61
17.68 75.67 76.95 1.28 1.15 23.68 85.42 0.30 19.66
17.78 75.62 76.90 1.28 1.15 23.71 85.39 0.31 19.71
17.88 75.57 76.85 1.28 1.15 23.73 85.36 0.31 19.76
17.98 75.52 76.80 1.28 1.15 23.76 85.33 0.31 19.81
18.08 75.47 76.75 1.28 1.15 23.79 85.30 0.31 19.87
18.18 75.42 76.70 1.27 1.14 23.81 85.26 0.31 19.92
18.28 75.37 76.65 1.27 1.14 23.84 85.23 0.31 19.97
18.38 75.33 76.60 1.27 1.14 23.86 85.20 0.31 20.02
18.48 75.28 76.55 1.27 1.14 23.89 85.17 0.31 20.07
18.58 75.23 76.50 1.27 1.14 23.91 85.14 0.31 20.11
18.68 75.18 76.45 1.27 1.14 23.94 85.11 0.32 20.16
18.78 75.13 76.40 1.27 1.14 23.96 85.08 0.32 20.21
18.88 75.08 76.35 1.27 1.14 23.99 85.04 0.32 20.26
18.98 75.03 76.30 1.26 1.13 24.01 85.01 0.32 20.31
19.08 74.98 76.24 1.26 1.13 24.04 84.98 0.32 20.36
19.18 74.93 76.19 1.26 1.13 24.06 84.95 0.32 20.40
19.28 74.88 76.14 1.26 1.13 24.08 84.92 0.32 20.45
19.38 74.84 76.09 1.26 1.13 24.11 84.88 0.32 20.50
19.48 74.79 76.04 1.26 1.13 24.13 84.85 0.32 20.55
19.58 74.74 75.99 1.26 1.13 24.15 84.82 0.33 20.59
19.68 74.69 75.94 1.26 1.13 24.18 84.79 0.33 20.64
19.78 74.64 75.89 1.25 1.13 24.20 84.75 0.33 20.68
19.88 74.59 75.84 1.25 1.12 24.22 84.72 0.33 20.73
19.98 74.54 75.79 1.25 1.12 24.25 84.69 0.33 20.77
20.08 74.49 75.74 1.25 1.12 24.27 84.65 0.33 20.82
20.18 74.44 75.69 1.25 1.12 24.29 84.62 0.33 20.86
20.28 74.39 75.64 1.25 1.12 24.31 84.59 0.33 20.91
20.38 74.35 75.59 1.25 1.12 24.33 84.55 0.33 20.95
20.48 74.30 75.54 1.25 1.12 24.36 84.52 0.33 21.00
20.58 74.25 75.49 1.24 1.12 24.38 84.49 0.34 21.04
20.68 74.20 75.44 1.24 1.12 24.40 84.45 0.34 21.08
20.78 74.15 75.39 1.24 1.12 24.42 84.42 0.34 21.13
20.88 74.10 75.34 1.24 1.11 24.44 84.39 0.34 21.17
20.98 74.05 75.29 1.24 1.11 24.46 84.35 0.34 21.21
21.08 74.00 75.24 1.24 1.11 24.48 84.32 0.34 21.25
21.18 73.95 75.19 1.24 1.11 24.50 84.28 0.34 21.30
21.28 73.90 75.14 1.24 1.11 24.52 84.25 0.34 21.34
21.38 73.86 75.09 1.24 1.11 24.54 84.21 0.34 21.38
-
67
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface
Elevation (ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
21.48 73.81 75.04 1.24 1.11 24.56 84.18 0.34 21.42
21.58 73.76 74.99 1.23 1.11 24.58 84.15 0.35 21.46
21.68 73.71 74.94 1.23 1.11 24.60 84.11 0.35 21.50
21.78 73.66 74.89 1.23 1.11 24.62 84.08 0.35 21.54
21.88 73.61 74.84 1.23 1.11 24.64 84.04 0.35 21.58
21.98 73.56 74.79 1.23 1.10 24.66 84.01 0.35 21.62
22.08 73.51 74.74 1.23 1.10 24.68 83.97 0.35 21.66
22.18 73.46 74.69 1.23 1.10 24.70 83.94 0.35 21.70
22.28 73.41 74.64 1.23 1.10 24.72 83.90 0.35 21.74
22.38 73.36 74.59 1.23 1.10 24.74 83.87 0.35 21.78
22.48 73.32 74.54 1.23 1.10 24.76 83.83 0.35 21.82
22.58 73.27 74.49 1.22 1.10 24.78 83.80 0.35 21.86
22.68 73.22 74.44 1.22 1.10 24.79 83.76 0.36 21.89
22.78 73.17 74.39 1.22 1.10 24.81 83.72 0.36 21.93
22.88 73.12 74.34 1.22 1.10 24.83 83.69 0.36 21.97
22.98 73.07 74.29 1.22 1.10 24.85 83.65 0.36 22.01
23.08 73.02 74.24 1.22 1.10 24.87 83.62 0.36 22.04
23.18 72.97 74.19 1.22 1.10 24.88 83.58 0.36 22.08
23.28 72.92 74.14 1.22 1.09 24.90 83.54 0.36 22.12
23.38 72.87 74.09 1.22 1.09 24.92 83.51 0.36 22.15
23.48 72.83 74.04 1.22 1.09 24.94 83.47 0.36 22.19
23.58 72.78 73.99 1.22 1.09 24.95 83.44 0.36 22.23
23.68 72.73 73.94 1.22 1.09 24.97 83.40 0.36 22.26
23.78 72.68 73.89 1.21 1.09 24.99 83.36 0.36 22.30
23.88 72.63 73.84 1.21 1.09 25.00 83.33 0.37 22.33
23.98 72.58 73.79 1.21 1.09 25.02 83.29 0.37 22.37
24.08 72.53 73.74 1.21 1.09 25.04 83.25 0.37 22.40
24.18 72.48 73.69 1.21 1.09 25.05 83.22 0.37 22.44
24.28 72.43 73.64 1.21 1.09 25.07 83.18 0.37 22.47
24.38 72.38 73.59 1.21 1.09 25.09 83.14 0.37 22.51
24.48 72.34 73.54 1.21 1.09 25.10 83.11 0.37 22.54
24.58 72.29 73.50 1.21 1.08 25.12 83.07 0.37 22.57
24.68 72.24 73.45 1.21 1.08 25.14 83.03 0.37 22.61
24.78 72.19 73.40 1.21 1.08 25.15 82.99 0.37 22.64
24.88 72.14 73.35 1.21 1.08 25.17 82.96 0.37 22.67
24.98 72.09 73.30 1.21 1.08 25.18 82.92 0.37 22.71
25.08 72.04 73.25 1.20 1.08 25.20 82.88 0.38 22.74
25.18 71.99 73.20 1.20 1.08 25.21 82.84 0.38 22.77
25.28 71.94 73.15 1.20 1.08 25.23 82.81 0.38 22.80
25.38 71.89 73.10 1.20 1.08 25.24 82.77 0.38 22.84
25.48 71.85 73.05 1.20 1.08 25.26 82.73 0.38 22.87
25.58 71.80 73.00 1.20 1.08 25.27 82.69 0.38 22.90
25.68 71.75 72.95 1.20 1.08 25.29 82.65 0.38 22.93
25.78 71.70 72.90 1.20 1.08 25.30 82.62 0.38 22.96
25.88 71.65 72.85 1.20 1.08 25.32 82.58 0.38 22.99
25.98 71.60 72.80 1.20 1.08 25.33 82.54 0.38 23.02
-
68
Station (ft)
Bed Elevation
(ft)
Water-surface
Elevation (ft)
Vertical Depth
(ft)
Flow Depth
(ft)
Flow Velocity
(ft/s)
Energy Grade Line (ft)
Local EGL
Slope (ft/ft)
Momentum Shear Stress (psf)
26.08 71.55 72.75 1.20 1.08 25.35 82.50 0.38 23.05
26.18 71.50 72.70 1.20 1.07 25.36 82.46 0.38 23.08
26.28 71.45 72.65 1.20 1.07 25.37 82.43 0.38 23.11
26.38 71.40 72.60 1.20 1.07 25.39 82.39 0.38 23.14
26.48 71.36 72.55 1.19 1.07 25.40 82.35 0.39 23.17
26.58 71.31 72.50 1.19 1.07 25.42 82.31 0.39 23.20
26.68 71.26 72.45 1.19 1.07 25.43 82.27 0.39 23.23
26.78 71.21 72.40 1.19 1.07 25.44 82.23 0.39 23.26
26.88 71.16 72.35 1.19 1.07 25.46 82.19 0.39 23.29
26.98 71.11 72.30 1.19 1.07 25.47 82.15 0.39 23.32
27.08 71.06 72.25 1.19 1.07 25.48 82.12 0.39 23.35
27.18 71.01 72.20 1.19 1.07 25.50 82.08 0.39 23.38
27.28 70.96 72.15 1.19 1.07 25.51 82.04 0.39 23.40
27.38 70.91 72.10 1.19 1.07 25.52 82.00 0.39 23.43
27.48 70.87 72.05 1.19 1.07 25.54 81.96 0.39 23.46
27.58 70.82 72.00 1.19 1.07 25.55 81.92 0.39 23.49
27.68 70.77 71.95 1.19 1.07 25.56 81.88 0.39 23.52
27.78 70.72 71.91 1.19 1.07 25.57 81.84 0.39 23.54
27.88 70.67 71.86 1.19 1.06 25.59 81.80 0.39 23.57
27.98 70.62 71.81 1.19 1.06 25.60 81.76 0.40 23