http:// icsr 1 microsoft anti-trust litigation the case for standards ken krechmer fellow, 2003...

9
http://www.standardsresearch.org ICSR Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards Research University of Colorado at Boulder [email protected]

Upload: norman-foster

Post on 11-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

1

Microsoft Anti-Trust LitigationThe Case for Standards

Ken KrechmerFellow, 2003

International Center for Standards ResearchUniversity of Colorado at Boulder

[email protected]

Page 2: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

2

Overview

What makes a monopoly?

Short history of monopolies

Why are monopolies bad?

Microsoft’s goal

Why are standards good?

Open standards alternative

What government action is best?

Page 3: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

3

What Makes a Monopoly?

1. What they supply is necessary.

2. They occupy peculiarly favored spots or lines of land.

3. The article or convenience they supply is used at the place where, and in connection with the plant or machinery by which, it is supplied.

4. This article or convenience can in general be largely, if not indefinitely, increased without proportionate increase in plant and capital.

5. Certainty and harmonious arrangement, which can only be attained by unity, are paramount considerations.

T.H. Farrer, The State in its Relation to Trade, 1883.

Page 4: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

4

Short History of Monopolies

Century Monopoly Form Conferred by

18th Toll roads, canals Royalty

19th Utilities Government

20th Compatibility * Market

* Standard Oil, IBM, Microsoft

Page 5: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

5

Stage: Emergence Expansion Market Domination Market abuse

Effect: Change Stability

Creative Destruction Destructive Creation

Why are Monopolies Bad?

Page 6: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

6

Microsoft Legal Goal

• Maintain control of Windows operating system application programming interfaces (APIs)

Page 7: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

7

Why are standards good?

• Define common interface

• Change by common agreement

• Do not require a disclosure of intellectual property

Page 8: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

8

Open Standards Alternative

In 1975 the FCC mandated standards (regulations now termed Part 68) creating the following large industries:

Modems

PBX’s

Answering machines

Telephones

Page 9: Http:// ICSR 1 Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation The Case for Standards Ken Krechmer Fellow, 2003 International Center for Standards

http://www.standardsresearch.org

ICSR

9

What Action is Best?

1. The rise of a competitive product or service

2. Government intervention

a. Control of the organization, e.g., utilities

b. Divestiture, e.g., AT&T, splitting the company into parts

c. The requirement of standards,

e.g., registered telephone jacks