hsj intelligence conference 2015
TRANSCRIPT
The NHS in the next 12 months
• An overview: the election and its consequences
• Finance
• Commissioning
• The provider sector
• Integration
• Efficiency and procurement
• Workforce
The five things that matter in 2015/16
• The election
• Funding and finance
• NHS performance
• Efficiency
• New care models
….and its consequences
• Permanent campaigning
• Local issues matter nationally
• Simon Stevens unbound?
• ‘Brave decisions’
What lies ahead in 2015-16?
• Dominant theme is likely to be the further spread
and deepening of hospital sector deficits.
• Problems that have been concentrated among
smaller DGHs will become common among
hitherto stronger performers.
• This could have serious knock-on consequences
for both provider policy generally and the NHS
Five Year Forward View.
How did we get to this point?
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
NHS Trusts
FTs
Provider sector surplus/deficit (£m)
The situation this year
• Data published by HSJ Intelligence last August
showed a forecast acute sector deficit of £773m
for 2014-15.
• M9 Monitor figures show a £375m forecast
deficit for FTs overall (driven by acute deficits).
• M8 NTDA figures show a £308m forecast deficit,
driven by a forecast £361m acute sector deficit
(despite undisclosed bailouts).
• A number of forecasts have deteriorated since
this point.
But specialised commissioning is under
increased strain
HSJ Intelligence, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital FT Investigation, July
2014:
“The second, more fundamental, risk [to Liverpool Heart and Chest
Hospital’s finances] is the parlous state of NHS England's specialised
commissioning budget, which accounts for more than 62 per cent of it’s
clinical income. NHS England reported a deficit of £377m on its specialised
commissioning budget in 2013-14, and has warned it will need a
‘significant stretch’ to balance the budget this year.
“There is limited scope for NHS England to reduce demand for tertiary
services, and this leaves the commissioner with limited alternatives for
containing its financial exposure to activity growth in these areas. Longer-
term, it can push for reconfiguration to potentially more-efficient models of
care, but the short term alternatives amount to either managing its risk by
seeking block or capped contracts, or restricting demand by defining
tighter access criteria. Both of these possibilities will remain risks for
providers like LHCH in coming years.”
Tariff row
• The tariff row has exposed both the pressure on
specialised commissioning and the overall lack of money
vs demand on the system.
• 210 providers have agreed to voluntary tariff, inc 3.5%
efficiency target and a 70% marginal rate on specialised
services.
• 30 objectors (mainly teaching trusts and specialists) will
remain on 2014-15 prices, but face the loss of 2.5%
CQUIN payments plus other penalties.
• A number of hitherto strong performers have told HSJ
they faced significant deficits under either option.
Implications
• We need to think through the dynamics of a
system in which deficits become the norm for
acute providers.
• This situation is undermining the credibility of a
range of provider policies, from the tariff, to the
failure regime, to the Dalton Review
recommendations.
• The NHS Five Year Forward View will also
become even harder to implement with the
provider sector preoccupied by financial
problems.
Commissioning: self imposed
restructure
1. Co-commissioning: Between NHS England and clinical
commissioning groups – of primary care and specialised
services.
2. NHS England national: Some reorganisation to change
focus
3. NHS England regional and local: Major change from four
regions and 25 area teams to bigger regional teams with 15
“sub-regions”.
4. NHS England: Focus on strategy, specialised
commissioning, (and in the short term “grip”?).
5. ‘Improvement architecture’: The futures of NHS Improving
Quality, NHS Leadership Academy, clinical networks, clinical
senates, AHSNs & others are under review
Primary care - strategy
• The primary care strategy has become the NHS
strategy (NHS Five Year Forward View)
• The plan is for GP practices to network / move
into bigger providers; and to extend the range of
services and activity carried out in primary care
• Also promise in FV of more resources and focus
on increasing workforce
• The FV envisages new integrated provider
organisations taking on leadership, planning and
funding of services
• So what is the point of clinical commissioning
groups….?
Shane Gordon,
North East
Essex CCG
Peter
Wilczynski,
Corby CCG
Paul Husselbee,
Southend CCG
Sam Barrell,
South Devon &
Torbay CCG
Dave Briggs,
Leicestershire &
Rutland CCG
A “whole health economy” NHS
• Financial strife & need for major service change
= management of “whole system” not individual
organisations
• National bodies are creating “whole system,
geographically based intervention regime”
• Monitor (foundation trusts) & NHS Trust
Development Authority (trusts may merge)
• But what are health economies?
CCGs’ declining influence
• Integrated providers taking over CCGs’ roles
• “Whole health economy” approach and structure
– eg Greater Manchester?
• Joining together health and social care
infrastructure
• But CCGs are legal bodies – with GPs as
leaders – will they fight back?
The sector is facing failure on a large scale – management teams will
be less independent.
This generation of leaders will not have lived through such a slump in
performance and funding.
• Theme 1: Integration is a rising political priority for
all three major parties.
• Theme 2: Councils will have an increasing say over
NHS spending.
• Theme 3: Integration is a critical challenge for NHS
England’s leaders.
The political imperative
• Fragmentation of services is an issue for ordinary
voters.
• The political answer to the problem: budget
pooling.
• Social care is broken: budgets have been cut 26
per cent 2010-2015 (ADASS figures)
• Yet no party says social care will be protected
after 2015.
The Better Care Fund
• A £5.3bn shared pot spanning health and social
care.
• Flawed premise: aims to save money by moving
care out of hospital
Will lead to:
• Financial headaches (especially for CCGs)
• Increased joint planning between CCGs and
councils
• New ways of delivering health and social care
The Better Care Fund – some likely
innovations:
• Multidisciplinary teams of health and social care
professionals based in primary care
• A single point of access to health and social care
services
• Risk stratification
• Joined up data
• Focus on indicators such as dementia diagnosis,
falls prevention, supporting carers.
• Councils want to get their hands on the NHS
budget
• They are unlikely to entirely get their way (see
Greater Manchester)
• But councils will increasingly get a say in local
NHS planning
• NHS and council budgets will increasingly blur at
the edges
Council involvement in NHS spending
The new care model vanguard
29 “vanguardistas” (Simon Stevens, 2015)
• Multispecialty Community Providers (MCPs)
• Primary and Acute Care Systems (PACS)
The new care model vanguard…
MCPs and PACs are exciting because:
• They join primary care with acute and community
services
• They will have capitated budgets
• They will give providers responsibility for
population health
The new care model vanguard…
The vanguard matters because:
• A glimpse of the future – the Forward View into
action
• A test of current leadership
• George Osborne has staked £2bn (arguably) on
the Forward View
The efficiency challenge
• NHS needs to deliver at least £22bn of annual
savings over the next five years’ to close a £30bn
funding deficit forecast, and that is providing that it
receive real terms increases of 1.5% a year
(Source: Five year forward view).
• This is a HUGE target.
The efficiency challenge
A Huge challenge:
• The low hanging fruit has already been plucked.
• Consensus that pay restraint will not be
repeatable over the coming years.
• New models of care will not be a silver bullet.
They will take time to bed in.
• So, the NHS must get a grip on driving down its
‘bread and butter’ costs such as procurement,
agency staff bill, back office costs and drugs bill.
The Carter review
Lord (Patrick) Carter of Coles
• Labour peer
• Former chair of US health IT firm McKesson’s (now
defunct) UK arm
• Former chair the NHS co-operation and competition panel
• Based in the Treasury
• Previously carried out review of NHS pathology services
The Carter review
• Lord Carter and his team have been working with 22
trusts
• The programme builds on work originally kicked off by
the DH based on its procurement strategy, Better
Procurement better value better care programme,
published in 2013.
• The Better procurement strategy set a target for all
trusts to submit their procurement data to a new
central data hub so that price comparisons could be
made by April 2015.
• Not a definitive score of an organisation’s efficiency.
But, starting point.
The Carter review
The review has focused on five core areas of spend:
• Staffing, particular agency/temporary staffing
costs
• Medicines
• Consumables (rubber gloves etc.)
• Medical devices
• Estates management
• Broad areas but they are striving for granular
details.
The Carter review: up to £10bn of savings
on offer?
No official announcements will be made before the
election but…
• Savings in the region of £8bn to £10bn discussed
• The DH’s target to cut £2bn off the NHS’s £22bn
procurement bill by 2015-16 is proving challenging
Conclusions
• Success rests on quality
• The DH has talked a good game about quality
data benchmarking for years. Now is the time for
action.
• A potentially game changing moment in NHS
efficiency.
• Trusts and suppliers can be held to account.
• Workforce – Significant change and focus on the nursing
workforce post Francis report.
• Growth in medical staff continues trend seen over the past
decade
• Challenges – Financial; quality; seven day services;
regulatory
• Reform of pay, terms and conditions
• Industrial relations at all-time low
• Threat of further strikes and unrest
• Future of medical and non-medical contracts
• Seven day services & the BMA
• Reform of AfC contracts and unsocial hours
premia
Alastair McLellan
Editor, HSJ
Rob Knott
National Director, Department of Health
Mike Farrar
Independent Management Consultant
The HSJ Intelligence mission
A strategic targeting and insight tool designed to help
suppliers build, maintain and deepen effective
partnerships with NHS clients • Save time and effort
• Identify the best opportunities
• Understand needs to enable the co-creation of solutions
• Provide an information safety net
HSJ Intelligence: the first year
• 100 in-depth investigations into the priorities of
leading NHS providers
• 30 in-depth investigations into the priorities of
leading clinical commissioning groups
• 30 exclusive briefings into key NHS trends and
issues
• 200 plus individual data points – updated at least
once a quarter
Where next?
1) Coverage: deeper/wider?
2) Viewpoint: healthcare economies?
3) Functionality: company wide access?
4) Service: bespoke research?