how to distinguish biblical reality from satan's alternative reality

7/26/2019 How to Distinguish Biblical Reality From Satan's Alternative Reality

1/42

1

How to Distinguish Biblical Reality

from Satan's Alternative Realityby Jeremy James

Modern Mount Sinai.

Believed by many to be the Biblical Mount Sinai or Horeb, "the holy mountain".

***

God never wastes His time. He is perfectly efficient in all that He does. Our

wonderful Creator executes His judgment summarily and no-one can restrain or

restrict Him in any way. When speaing a!out the culmination of the "O#$%s

dealings with &srael' the apostle (aul put it lie this) "For he will finish the work an!cut it short in righteousness because a short work will the #or! make u$on the earth%"

&Romans ()*

We find this throughout cripture' where the "O#$ carries out His will and purpose

at all times in perfect accordance with His plan for manind. +here may a gap of

several years' perhaps even hundreds of years' !etween a prophesied event and its

ultimate fulfillment' !ut we are never given to understand that this is due toprevarication of any ind on His part. #ather the ,i!le descri!es any such delay

from a human perspective as an expression of the wonderful attri!ute nown as His

longsuffering. Where retri!ution is concerned He gives us more time than we

deserve to confess our sin and repent. +he apostle (eter referred specifically to this

when he said) "+he #or! is not slack concerning his $romise as some men countslackness, but is longsuffering to us-war! not willing that any shoul! $erish but that all

shoul! come to re$entance%" &( .eter /*

When He created all things in six days' the "O#$ was not constrained !y limitations

of time. He could have made all things instantly' !ut if He had' we would have lost

the many spiritual teachings and patterns that are em!odied in the Genesis account.


2/42

2

/s we noted in our earlier paper True Cosmology: The Earth that the LORD God of

All Creation Made for His Son0 the "O#$ made the earth for the second /dam' 0esus

of 1a2areth. &n His forenowledge He new that the first /dam would diso!ey Hisholy will and that' as a result' His only !egotten on would one day inherit all things.

When we see the wor of God in this light' we can understand why nothing He does

can involve any unnecessary delay. He wants only what is !est for His on and will

not countenance a course of action' either in heaven or on earth' that would cause His

on to wait longer than necessary to inherit the earth.

What are the implications of this3 Well' the earth cannot !e any older than is

necessary to carry out this plan. &t cannot !e millions of years old. 1either can the

ingdom that the "O#$ God of &srael has made for His on !e anything less than the

most imposing and most resplendent !ody in all Creation. +his can only mean that

modern /stronomy is either lying or deceived when it maintains that the %universe% is

!illions of light years across or that it contains galaxies and star systems of staggering

magnitude' with celestial !odies that are millions of times larger than the earth.

/s we showed in our earlier papers' the stars are lights in the night sy' while the sun

and moon are tiny compared to the earth see The Host of Heaven and Our Stationary

Earth: The Great Cosmologial Lie. /s Christians we should !e a!le to understand why

this must !e so and have the humility to consider the evidence.

How the great 1osmological Dece$tion came about+he #eformation was a major set!ac for atan. / !oo that had !een !anned !y the

#oman Catholic Church for centuries was now freely availa!le in many parts of

4urope. +his !oo the wonderful Word of God contained the truth a!out manind

and the world we live in. &n order to regain all that he lost in the #eformation' the

4nemy needed to convince manind that the world around us is actually very different

from the earth and the heavens descri!ed in the ,i!le. +his meant he had to dream up

an alternative reality and plant it firmly in the minds of men.


3/42

3

&n doing this he was lie a stage magician who understands the psychology' ha!its

and expectations of his audience. 1ormally' when we see an illusion performed on

stage' we knowit is an illusion even if we don%t now how it wors 5and usually we

don%t6. ,ut when we see the same illusion performed in an unfamiliar setting on the

street' for example it is far more impressive' if not unsettling.

atan is a great liar' a master of deception. He nows how to create and perform an

illusion in ways that mae it !elieva!le. He has a phenomenal understanding of

human psychology and human weaness. &f we add to this his nowledge of the laws

of physics and how everything fits together' we have the ultimate &llusionist.

Given that he controls !oth the wealth of the world and the government of nations' we

ought to assume that he has already created a num!er of convincing illusions to

mislead and deceive the minds and hearts of humanity. 7urthermore we can !e sure

that his loyal servants among the fallen rans of humanity are co-operating with him

where necessary to produce and exploit these illusions.

&n this paper we will loo at some of the illusions that he has designed for manind as

a whole. /fter all' we need to remem!er that he deceives' not only individuals and

groups' !ut entire nations. 8ltimately' when he presents his %son% to the world as the

true 4nd +ime messiah the figure we now as the /ntichrist he will !e attempting

the most audacious illusion of all.

Disinformation $ro$agan!a an! the 1ounter-ReformationWe usually thin of the Counter-#eformation primarily as an all-out assault on the

(rotestant churches in 4urope' a program of exceptional violence and cruelty

organi2ed !y the #oman Catholic Church and led !y the 0esuits. ,ut in addition to the

political and military aspects of this program' the ca!al that esta!lished the 0esuitscunningly included a campaign of disinformation. uccess in war often depends on

the effective use of propaganda to demorali2e the enemy' and what !etter way to

demorali2e Christians who !elieve in the literal truth of the ,i!le than to present them

with %proof% that' in certain respects' the Word is not relia!le3

Isaac Newtons detailed dia!ram o the #hiloso$hers Stone, a ma!icalob%ect that could su$$osedly turn base metal into !old.


4/42

&

cience in its modern form was founded in the 9:th century !y the 4uropean occult

societies' the #osicrucians and the 7reemasons. &t was designed to !rea away from

the ,i!le and explain how the universe wored without any necessary reference to

God.+he God they were seeing to circumvent was the "O#$ God of the ,i!le' not the

%god% of their own occult !eliefs. ince they couldn%t reveal that this was their real

intention' they invented the idea nown as $eism that the God of the ,i!le had

stepped !ac' as it were' and left the universe to run !y itself' lie a vast machine. &n

this way they could ignore the ,i!le while pretending to respect it.

Having cast God in the role of a passive and impersonal o!server' science !egan to

teach that men had the tas of mastering the laws of the universe and !ecoming gods

in their own right. +his was not just an opportunity' they argued' !ut a moral duty' one

which only the greatest mem!ers of humanity' the illuminated elite' could accomplish.

/s explained in our paper' True Cosmology: The Earth that the LORD God of All

Creation Made for His Son' the great !reathrough came with the so-called Copernican

#evolution. +he common people of 4urope were informed through various means

that the earth was actually a sphere that moved in a regular annual or!it around the

sun. +his information was allowed to %lea out% over a num!er of decades' rather lie a

salacious rumour that eventually made its way into every village and hamlet in

4urope. ince there was no identifia!le agent advancing the idea and no clear

statement of case in its favor with virtually no evidence that might allow this

revolutionary hypothesis to !e tested the idea slowly too hold.

#ortable orrery by 'illiam (ones, c 1)2*.

+hin of 1orth ;orea today. 4urope in the 9: thcentury was su!ject to a very similar

system of mind control' where the masses were compelled to see the world through

the filter of state propaganda. +he widespread introduction of clocs and timepieces

during this period' as well as novel mechanical devices such as orreries 5clocwor

models of the solar system6' lent credence to the idea that the universe wored in a

similar way.


5/42

+

,i!le-o!servant Christian leaders at that time' preoccupied with the #eformation and

the urgent need to propound and defend a true ,i!lical system of theology' did little to

contest this revolutionary new idea. (erhaps they thought it would not !e taen too

seriously !y the general population. +o some extent they were right' !ut theyunderestimated the impact of the next ground!reaing %discovery% gravity.

+he meta$hysical 'force' known as gravity+oday our educational system treats the concept of gravity as a truth so o!vious that

we wonder why so many were shoced when it was first proposed !y 1ewton. What

we fail to see today' !ut which many learned individuals recogni2ed at the time' is

that 1ewton%s law of gravity is actually a metaphysical rather than a physical idea.

+hey new from experimental evidence that o!jects accelerated toward the ground

5fell6 at a constant rate. +his wasn%t new. What 1ewton did was add a novel

efficient cause to this o!vious fact' and he did so without offering any experimental

evidence whatever< He said that o!jects fell toward the earth !ecause the mass of theearth exerted a gravitational attraction which drew the o!ject toward its center. ince

gravity was the same all over the earth' then the earth itself must !e a sphere' with all

points on its surface e=uidistant from the center.

/ccording to his theory' even the smallest particle of matter exerted a gravitational

attraction. However' the gravitational attraction !etween o!jects on the surface of the

earth was infinitesimally small compared to that exerted !y the earth itself and could

not !e measured. o' even though %gravity%' as it was called' was a purely speculative

idea' it was accepted !y the majority of scientists. Why was this3 Well' most of them

were 7reemasons and the idea of %gravity%' an impersonal force that regulated the

entire universe' was very appealing. &t was the dream of $eism' an ordering principleof great explanatory power that allowed them to descri!e the motion of the planets !y

reference to the supposed gravitational forces exerted !etween them. +he >asonic

god' %the Great /rchitect%' set the vast mechanism of the universe in motion in ages

past and it simply operated thereafter lie a clocwor device that would never run

down.

Masonic la$el $in sold by ma-on,with its ucier sun/!od symbol.


6/42

0

+his was an incredi!ly clever tric. We thin today that 1ewton' the ardent

astrologer' explained how the solar system wored' when in reality he invented a

pseudo-scientific idea that allowed him to turn astrology into astronomy. His theory

of gravity was designed to provide a convincing mathematical framewor that would

underpin the Gnostic and >asonic !elief that the planets were in or!it around the sun.&n effect' !etween them' 1ewton' ;epler and Copernicus' invented the %solar system%ars' >ercury' and other celestial !odies' each of which was a god in its own

right 5+oday they even spea of the earth as a goddess' Gaia6. >ost importantly' as a

physical depiction of an astrological chart' it placed the sun at the center of the %solar

system%.

"ucifer' the sun god' is the great god of Gnosticism and 7reemasonry 5though they

prefer to call him Osiris' /pollo or Helios6. He tries to convince men that they should

worship him as the one true god and that all life depends on his %radiance%' just lie the

sun itself. He also expects all supernatural !eings to worship him and re=uires that

they or!it around him' just lie the planets on an astrological chart or a model of the

%solar system%.

+he so-called solar system is nothing more than an attempt to convince men that

"ucifer is the center of the universe and that their well-!eing depends on him. +he

sun is not @A million miles away' !ut a mere A'BB miles a!ove the earth DWe will

show later why they piced the num!er @AE. +he diameter of the sun is not F:B'

miles' !ut AA miles or therea!outs. 5ee our paper' The Host of Heaven and Our

Stationary Earth: The Great Cosmologial Lie' for a more detailed discussion of this

and related issues.6 +he moon is only A'A miles a!ove the earth' not I' miles

as 1// maintains' and has a diameter of A9 miles or so' not '9: miles. +he

planets' as they are called' are lights in the sy that move in a predicta!le manner'

independent of each other' while the stars are fixed in relation to each other and rotate

around the earth every I hours. +he earth is millions of times larger than any other

o!ject in creation' while the %universe%' just lie the %solar system%' is simply a product

of man%s re!ellious' pride-filled imagination)

"An! 23D saw that the wicke!ness of man was great in the earth

an! that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart wasonly evil continually%" &2enesis 45*

antasy Science

he bi! ban!cosmic/e!!

universe,43 billion li!htyears across.


7/42

5

6nlarging the False 7o!el of the 8niverse+he 4nemy must have decided that his heliocentric system was not sufficiently

outrageous and set a!out developing a more dynamic' mind-!ending cosmology. He

would create a model of the universe that was more chaotic' more impersonal' and

more devoid of purpose than the solar system. &t would !e so staggeringly vast that it

would defeat all attempts to comprehend it in ,i!lical terms. &t would comprise' not

just a solar system or even a galaxy' !ut hundreds of millions of galaxies' most of

which were !ound to have at least one earth-lie planet teeming with life.

+his was surely the mother of all lies. +he wonderful earth that the "O#$ God of all

creation had made for His on was now reduced to nothing more than a spec of dirt

in a cosmos peppered with similar earth-lie %planets%. &t was not remotely special.

7urthermore' man was just one of many miscellaneous life-forms on an insignificant

roc' all of which sprung originally from inanimate matter and evolved purely !y

chance. +o top it all' the material from which they sprang and on which they lived

was produced !y a huge explosion nown as the %!ig !ang.%

&n order to prepare manind for this lie a masterpiece of demonic deception he had

to develop a system of mathematics in which a!solute si2e and a!solute distance were

essentially meaningless' a system in which space and time were purely relative.

Within such a system it would !e possi!le to spea of impossi!ly vast distances and

unimagina!ly extended periods of time as though they were real empirical entities.

+he greater the si2e of the universe' in terms of space and mass' the more naJve and

irrelevant the ,i!lical account would !e made to seem.

6instein an! His 9maginary 8niverse

4instein proved to !e the ideal vehicle for this purpose. His special and generaltheories of relativity 5which he !ra2enly plagiarised from other scientists6 were just

another way of descri!ing matter and motion in mathematical terms. While they

added nothing of value to 1ewtonian mechanics' they eliminated the need for a fixed

frame of reference. &n this relativistic model' it didn%t matter %where% the earth was in

space or what %si2e% it was in a!solute terms' !ut only where and what it was relative

to another celestial !ody. +he %real% world was no longer an o!jective reality whose

properties and characteristics could !e o!served experimentally' !ut a complex we! of

relationships in time and space whose properties and characteristics were contingent

on the o!server.

he Hubble elesco$e, alle!edly$hoto!ra$hed rom the s$ace shuttle

Discovery.

'hy not $oint it toward the earth and

transmit live covera!e o our $lanet

rotatin! on its a6is, or sim$ly use an

on/board camera to transmit a live

video eed o the stars movin!

across the s7y8 'hy indeed.


8/42

)

+here was no way to test 4instein%s claims through an earth-!ased experiment !ecause

his theory ruled out this possi!ility. +he magnitudes he was descri!ing were so great

that they could only !e tested in the depths of interstellar space. +his implied that any

test which verified his theory re=uired in turn the real existence of vast interstellar

distances. +hus' lie 1ewton' 4instein got men to !elieve in a huge universe %outthere%' not !y offering fresh experimental evidence' !ut !y getting them to reinterpret

what they already new. Once they put on his %math-tinted% glasses' the whole

universe seemed a !illion times larger.

/ccording to his theory' neither space nor time were a!solute !ut relative' which

meant that an hour' say' here on earth might correspond to a slightly longer 5or

shorter6 period in another galaxy. He claimed that this was due to the interdependence

of space and time giving rise to a space-time continuum and to the relative

position of the o!server. ince the o!server sees a remote o!ject as light travelling

toward him' the o!servation is affected !y the curvature of the space-time continuum

through which the light passes. &f the o!server himself is travelling at close to thespeed of light' his !ody will experience the passage of time more %slowly% than

someone who is stationary.

A 1osmic Revolution without a Shre! of 6vi!ence4instein did not perform a single experiment to test any of his claims. #ather he

conducted what he called %thought experiments% in which he imagined what might !e

happening under certain extreme conditions. +his approach mared a major turning

point in science' where experimental verification and specifically the interpretation

of experimental data was constrained in certain ways !y the theory itself.

+he #uling 4lite were eager to promote the +heory of #elativity since it provided yetanother way of attacing the Word of God. +hrough their control of the media they

were a!le to campaign for its acceptance' all the while hailing 4instein as a genius'

perhaps the greatest genius who ever lived. +hey also gave widespread coverage to

an experiment in 9@9@' which we will discuss shortly' which purported to verify the

theory.

/s a result' most scientists and even the general pu!lic were tempted to accept

that time itself was relative to the o!server. +he example usually given was that of a

spaceship leaving the earth at close to the speed of light and travelling for many years

across the galaxy. /llegedly' when they returned to earth' the crew of the spaceship

would !e younger than their counterparts who remained on earth. +his is supposed to

!e science' right3 Well' let%s tae a closer loo)


9/42

4

+he diagram a!ove shows the spaceship travelling at close to the speed of light' away

from the earth. /ccording to the +heory of #elativity' the residents on earth are

ageing faster than the space travellers. ,ut' according to the same theory' it should notmatter whether the spaceship was moving away from the earth or whether the earth

was moving away from the spaceship 5at the same rate6. ince there are no a!solute

frames of reference' the net effect ought to !e the same)

,ut it%s not< &n the second diagram the earth residents 5who are travelling at close to

the speed of light relative to the spaceship6 are ageing more slowly than the crew of

the spaceship !ut how can that !e3 +hey cannot !e ageing more =uicly and more

slowly. &f exactly the same phenomenon gives two contradictory results' then the

theory must !e false.

7athematics an! 7eta$hysics usur$ the science of .hysics

What' then' was the real purpose of #elativity +heory3 /fter all' standard 1ewtonian>echanics had always given consistently accurate results in relation to terrestrial

motion. ince the pro!lems addressed !y 4instein were largely imaginary What

must it !e lie to travel on a !eam of light3 he ended up with a theory that made

several assumptions a!out the physical universe that were not necessarily true. 7or

example' it was possi!le in the example given a!ove to imagine and prove

mathematically that neither the earth nor the spaceship were in motion !ut that the

space !etween them was expanding.

+he whole purpose of #elativity +heory was to replace the science nown as (hysics

with a new pseudo-science that com!ined >athematics and >etaphysics. +his new

science came to !e nown as /strophysics' though Astral Physicswould !e a moreaccurate description.

0ust as 1ewton used the metaphysical idea nown as Gravity to invent the solar

system' 4instein used another metaphysical idea' #elativity' to invent an expanding

space-time continuum in which the earth was just a trivial spec. +his was Gnostic

chicanery at its most cynical. Once scientists accepted the fundamental assumptions

!ehind the two theories' namely Gravity and #elativity' they were hooed. &t never

seemed to occur to them that the entities in =uestion had never !een proven. 1either

1ewton nor anyone else has ever shown that matter exerts a gravitational attraction.


10/42

1*

cientists are still trying to find %gravitational waves% in the vain hope that they might

one day prove that gravity is real and not just a useful mathematical fiction. +he same

is true of #elativity. 1o one has ever shown that matter can !end the space around it'

that time is affected !y acceleration' or that it is possi!le to mae o!jective

measurements in space and time without an a!solute frame of reference.

3b:ective 7easurement is re$lace! by +heory an! S$eculationWith #elativity +heory it was now possi!le to calculate staggering magnitudes in

space' time and mass without having to show whether or not they have any physical

reality. #elativity +heory told us nothing new a!out the world. &nstead it has caused

confusion to reign in the minds of men. ,y distorting time and space' it has made it

more difficult for anyone especially the average person to consider and assess

standard phenomena in clear-cut' rational terms. &f space' time and motion are

interconnected in a fundamental way' then the universe could !e any si2e' and any

part of it could !e stationary relative to any other' even if !oth were in real motion.

&ndeed' it !ecomes virtually impossi!le to envisage anything in a state of a!solutemotion since there is no fixed point anywhere no frame of reference against which

its o!jective inetic state can !e measured.

#elativity +heory has made it possi!le for devious minds to concoct all sorts of exotic

cosmic phenomena and importantly to descri!e them accurately in mathematical

terms. >en of science are mesmeri2ed !y the power of mathematics' especially if they

have !een conditioned !y the scientific paradigms taught in modern universities. &f an

o!served phenomenon' however speculative' can !e descri!ed accurately in

mathematical terms' there is a great temptation to !elieve it is real. +here is also a

great incentive to postulate such entities if it results in the pu!lication of a paper in a

reputa!le journal or an appointment in due course with a prestigious academicinstitution.

Out of this fictitious model of the universe have emerged e=ually fictitious entities'

such as !lac holes' neutron stars' dar matter' and much else !esides.

7any re$utable scientists re:ecte! Relativity +heory&t is not generally nown that many highly reputa!le scientists rejected #elativity

+heory as sheer nonsense. +hese included #o!ert >illian' who received a 1o!el

(ri2e for physicsK "ouis 4ssen' who invented the atomic clocK 4rnest #utherford' an

influential scientist who won the 1o!el (ri2e for chemistryK Her!ert &ves' who made a

significant contri!ution to the invention of the televisionK 1iola +esla' one of thegreatest inventors and electrical engineers of all timeK and the !rilliant /ustrian

physicist' 4rnest >ach' who dismissed relativity theory as paradoxical nonsense.

9rnest Machon an ustrian stam$issued in his honor.


11/42

11

&f scientists of this cali!re rejected it' then why has it !ecome the prevailing

mathematical methodology for interpreting the universe3 /s we have already noted'

much of its success can !e attri!uted to the high pu!lic profile given to 4instein

himself. &nterestingly' he was awarded the 1o!el (ri2e in 9@@' not for his wor on#elativity which many scientists at that time still rejected as philosophical tricery

!ut for his wor on the photoelectric effect. He was feted in the mainstream media as

someone who had transformed our understanding of the world' which indeed he had'

!ut without any regard to legitimate experimental science. +he %universe% he descri!ed

existed only in his imagination.

Relativity +heory became the mo!ern e;uivalent of


12/42

12

4instein did much the same with his #elativity theory. Once you remove an a!solute

frame of reference when speaing a!out time and space' you automatically create all

inds of phenomena that have no !asis in reality. 4instein effectively updated Leno%s(aradox for the thcentury.

6!!ington's .hony 6=$eriment+he first %scientific% confirmation of his wor came in 9@9@ when /rthur 4ddington' a

strong supporter of 4instein' claimed to have detected the curvature of light that the

theory predicted. He had set up an experiment for this purpose on an island off the

west coast of /frica that would ena!le him to measure the position of certain stars

during a total solar eclipse. He concluded that the photographic evidence supported

4instein%s prediction that the gravitational field of the sun would !end the light from

these stars and cause their perceived positions to shift slightly. However' many

scientists were not convinced !y 4ddington%s experiment' which was very crude !ytoday%s standards. &t is generally accepted that he made a num!er of assumptions that

ena!led him arrive at the conclusion he was hoping to find.

he NS website states

"his is a $hoto!ra$h o oneo the stars measured durin!the May 24, 1414 solar ecli$seto conirm 9instein;s li!htdelection. he ima!e has beenma!niied 2)1 times. he red

dot shows where the star;s$osition should have been hadthe sun not been $resent."

htt$>>sunearth!ay%nasa%gov>(??4>locatio

ns>einstein%$h$

Note the website address< / sunearthday

he Babylonian reverence or the sun is such that NS mar7swhat it calls Sun/9arth =ay. ccordin! to 'i7i$edia

"he day itsel is mainly celebrated in the >Snear the time o the s$rin! e?uino6."

he NS website also reers to Sun/9arth =ay by its initials, S9=.Here is what 'i7i$edia says about Sed

"he Sed estival @ was an ancient 9!y$tian ceremonythat celebrated the continued rule o a $haraoh. he name

is ta7en rom the name o an 9!y$tian wol !od @"

+he same people the 4nglish 7reemasons who made up the a!surd fiction nown

as dinosaurs' also made up the e=ually a!surd fiction nown as gravity and' crucially'

lent their support to the empty speculation 5most of it plagiari2ed6 !y a minor official

in the wiss (atent Office' the hitherto unnown /l!ert 4instein.


13/42

13

7or those who hated Christianity and the ,i!le' it was essential that 4instein%s theory

!e widely accepted. /ll inds of !i2arre cosmic phenomena could !e treated as

plausi!le in a universe that operated on relativistic principles. +he universe itself

could even !e made to seem !illions of times larger than previously thought' and theearth relatively speaing would shrin to the si2e of a spec of dirt< +hese guys

didn%t simply want to refute the ,i!le they wanted to ridicule it. +hey new that

#elativity theory would completely overturn the model of creation portrayed in the

,i!le' where the earth is !oth flat and stationary and easily the largest %o!ject% in

existence' where the sun travels in a circuit a!ove the earth' and where the stars are set

in a fixed' contiguous position in the firmament) "An! 2o! set them in the firmamentof the heaven to give light u$on the earth" &2enesis @@*

3ne Hoa= lea!s to Another+he greatest !oost to #elativity +heory came from the supposed development of the

atomic !om!. +he world was told that such a device was detonated successfully at aremote test site in 1ew >exico and later deployed on two occasions in 0apan.

However there is no credi!le evidence to support this. Hiroshima and 1agasai were

apparently fire!om!ed just lie seventy other 0apanese cities. 1either city was

polluted !y nuclear radiation and neither city suffered damage consistent with a

nuclear !last. +he /llies spun the atomic !om! story in order to lay the foundation for

a prolonged Cold War !etween the 8/ and the 8#. Without the threat of mutual

annihilation' there would have !een no Cold War. >oreover' the 8nited 1ations the

prototype for world government would never have !een formed without the threat

of an all-out nuclear war and the continental devastation it would cause. Dee our

earlier paper' !hy E"#losive $ulear Devies May $ot E"ist.E

nuclear chain reaction is $ure antasy. 9ach neutron e%ected at hi!h s$eed

sim$ly 7noc7s a neutron out o a nearby nucleus, $roducin! an isoto$e and heat.

his is what ha$$ens in a nuclear $ower station. "runaway" or uncontrolled

chain reaction would sim$ly melt the uranium metal,

as ha$$ened at u7ushima, (a$an in March, 2*11.


14/42

1&

+here were other reasons for the atomic !om! hoax. &t ensured that the highly

profita!le arms industry would continue to prosper and enrich the scheming ca!al of

families that controlled the military-industrial complex. +he influence exercised !y

this ca!al would swell enormously during the Cold War and allow them to steer the

8nited 1ations toward world government.

A 1hil!ish 6;uation/nother !enefit was the awestruc admiration it created for 4instein%s phony

e=uation' 4Mmc' where m is mass and c is the speed of light 5We will discuss the

latter in a moment6. ?irtually everyone in the world today has heard of this e=uation.

&t supposedly expresses the amount of energy that would !e released if matter could

!e converted instantaneously into energy. ,ut no-one is even sure what it means< &f a

!asic unit lie an electron is still poorly understood' it is impossi!le to see how any

e=uation however complex could definitively express how a given amount of

matter would convert into pure energy.&t is also significant that the e=uation that purports to express this incredi!ly complex

process should !e so simple that even a child could remem!er it< &t reads more lie an

advertising slogan than a serious piece of scientific research.

7or purposes of comparison' let%s loo at some real scientific e=uations)

@%

(%

/%

+he first 5N96 is the fundamental +heorem for Calculus. &t allows one to calculate' for

example' how long it would tae to fill a !ath if the plug was removed and !oth taps

were running.

+he second 5N6 is the Wave 4=uation. &t allows one to express the !ehavior of awave' such as that made !y a vi!rating guitar string.

+he third 5NA6 is the 7ourier +ransform' which allows complex patterns to !e !roen

into more intelligi!le chuns 5such as compressing the information in a 0(4G image

so that it can !e more easily transmitted over the &nternet6.

1aturally' these e=uations mae no sense to the average person' and yet they deal with

very simple everyday events running a !ath' plucing a guitar' or sending a photo

via email. However' when we are dealing with one of the most incredi!ly complex

processes imagina!le' turning matter into pure energy' the mind!oggling transform-

ation involved can !e expressed with magical simplicity as 4Mmc.


15/42

1+

+he great dream of the medieval alchemist was to turn transform !ase metal into

gold 5ee 1ewton%s mathematical description of the (hilosopher%s tone on page A

a!ove6. 4instein was engaged in a similar alchemical =uest to transform !ase matterinto light. ,oth goals are grounded in Gnosticism' Ca!ala and 4gyptian magic. o too

is the modern goal of creating new elements !y !om!arding heavy atomic nuclei

with high speed particles using a cyclotron or high-energy collider. /ll of the

elements to date' a!out two do2en or so' resulting from these exercises are unsta!le

and most of them exist for only a fraction of a second. +hey are' in any practical

sense' imaginary.

Babylonian umerologyWe have referred in previous papers to the !irth of modern science. >ost of the

people responsi!le for esta!lishing the main scientific institutions in 4urope in the

9

th

century were either 7reemasons or #osicrucians. /s far as the pu!lic wasconcerned' they were orthodox Christians' !ut !ehind the scenes they held a very

different view of the world. +hey worshipped the sun god' nown variously as Osiris'

/pollo' or Helios. /s enemies of Christianity' they wanted !elievers to adopt an

understanding of reality that strayed as far as possi!le from the ,i!le. +his meant

developing a system of science that had no place for God and then using the laws and

tools of that %science% to frame a cosmology that differed sharply from the ,i!lical

worldview. &n doing so they developed a model that exalted the sun' the principal

sym!ol of their god' and triviali2ed the ingdom that Christ would inherit on his

return.

Basic structural moti o the ondon Accult rid

CSee $$endi6 D.

Based on the ma!ical number 3111 in Babylonian numerolo!y.


16/42

10

&t is well nown that 7reemasonry is deeply attached to the num!ers 9 and A' as well

as com!inations of these num!ers' nota!ly 99 and 9A. ,ecause of their potency' they

are associated with solar sym!ology. &n our earlier study of the ,a!ylonian

sym!olism that pervades the monuments of "ondon' we revealed the occult

importance of the num!er A999 and its connection with the sun 5ee extract inA$$en!i= A6.

When they placed the sun at the center of the universe' they gave it a >asonic

signature. &ts distance from the earth was said to !e @A million miles' where @A

represents A9 times A. ince numerical order is often irrelevant in numerology' A9 is

another way of expressing the num!er 9A. +he num!er @A may also !e expressed in

>asonic %unitytrinity% numerology as 9P9AP9AP9AP9AP9AP9AP9AP9.

We can see that the fictional distance !etween the earth and sun was chosen for its

sym!olic force in ,a!ylonian magic. &n fact' according to Wiipedia' the estimated

diameter of the o!serva!le universe is a!out @A !illion light-years. /gain thenum!er @A is seen to have a special occult significance.

+hey also associated another important >asonic num!er with the sun. &n their

pseudo-scientific cosmology the sun' !y volume' is said !y 1// to !e AAA'

times larger than the earth. &n choosing this num!er they are mocing Christ who

will inherit the earth on his return !y maing his ;ingdom AAA' times less

significant than the sym!ol of their sun god' "ucifer.

he 9arth is made to seem utterly insi!niicant ne6t to the Sun.

In Babylonian ma!ic, the Sun is the !reatest symbol o uciers

$ower and status. he 9arth E althou!h created and richly endowed

by the AF= od o the Bible E is reduced to a $athetic s$ec7.

+his is the ind of vile !lasphemy that atan relishes.


17/42

15

&n (salm 9I' the great creation psalm' the Word of God says)

"+hou sen!est forth thy s$irit they are create! an! thou renewest

the face of the earth% +he glory of the #3RD shall en!ure for ever

the #3RD shall re:oice in his works%" &.salm @?C/?-/@*

What !eautiful words +he "O#$ shall rejoice in His wors. +his is why the

,a!ylonian cult that controls this world 5or thins it does6 is so een to moc what

God has done. +hey would rather ascri!e everything in existence to !lind chance

and turn virtually the whole of creation into a meaningless !lac void nown as %outer

space% than accept that the "O#$ God of &srael created the world and that one day

His wonderful on' 0esus of 1a2areth' will judge all manind in accordance with His

holy will.

+he 7ile an! ilometer+he &lluminati' the leaders of the ,a!ylonian cult' !elieve that certain sym!ols

function as potent conduits of supernatural power and can exercise a materialinfluence over everyday reality. +his is why they try to incorporate many of these'

including references to their pantheon of gods' into their various activities and

programs' and if possi!le insinuate them into social discourse. 7or example' this is

why every day of the wee is named after one of their gods) the un' the >oon' +iu

5or >ars6' Odin 5or >ercury6' +hor 5or 0upiter6' 7reya 5or ?enus6' and aturn.

+here are two standard units for measuring distance' the mile and the ilometer. ,oth

have !een in use for some time and !oth were ar!itrarily defined. +here is no

particular reason why the mile should !e BF feet in length. /s a unit of

measurement the mile could have !een made a little longer or a little shorter.

However' once its extent was determined' it could not !e changed as it had to servethereafter as a standard' immuta!le unit of measurement. 5We can only wonder

whether the unit was deli!erately determined so that' when the diameters of the moon

and the sun were expressed in miles' they would prove to !e A9 and AA respectively.

ee our earlier paper' The Host of Heaven and Our Stationary Earth: The Great

Cosmologial Lie%6

/nd why BF feet3 Well' numerologically BF is the same as BF' which is the sum

of all num!ers from 9 to A. +here are A points on the compass and A degrees in

cottish #ite 7reemasonry 5+he AArddegree is an honorary one6.

+he ilometer' too' has a connection with the compass. When this metric unit was

!eing defined 5again ar!itrarily6 !y the 7rench in the early 9@thcentury' the scientific

committee convened for that purpose lined it to the nown distance !etween the

1orth (ole and the 4=uator 5ee chart !elow6. +his is significant since the 1orth (ole

is the true geographical center of the flat' stationary earth' while the 4=uator is the

only path taen !y the sun that has the 1orth (ole as its center. +his would normally

!e considered an eccentric way to decide an ar!itrary unit of length' !ut not to a

practitioner of ,a!ylonian magic. /s a result' the ilometer was defined as one ten-

millionth 59-:6 of the distance !etween the 1orth (ole and the 4=uator 5which is

9' ilometers or :'9I miles6.


18/42

1)

+he >asonic connection is not only with the num!ers themselves !ut also with the

choice of the defining attri!ute' namely the only circuit of the sun that has the 1orth

(ole as its center. +his motif' the circle and its center' is well-nown in 7reemasonry.

Once again' we refer the reader to A$$en!i= A which shows the great importance

attached to sun-circle sym!olism in the ,a!ylonian religion.

+he (oint within a Circle is another sym!ol of greatimportance in 7reemasonry' and commands peculiar

attention in this connection with the ancient

sym!olism of the universe and the solar or!.

/l!ert >acey' The Symbolism of Freemasonry

D>acey was a high level 7reemason whose writings

are regarded as authoritative !y >asonsE

"ie their master atan' these people are convinced that the earth is rightfully theirs.

+hey see themselves as the master race since they worship the %master% and

superior in every way to the rest of humanity. +hus they have no moral scruples whenit comes to destroying the lives of millions in another needless war. +hey now Christ

will return to earth someday to claim his ingdom and they are getting ready to defy

him. +hey are convinced that their great hero' "ucifer the "ight-!ringer' will !e a!le

to defeat Christ on his return and destroy !oth the 0ews and ,i!le-!elieving

Christians. /t that stage they intend to parade their religion openly and re=uire that all

manind worship their incarnate god' the !eing we call the /ntichrist !ut whom they

now as the Coming >essiah' the >aitreya' the World +eacher' or the 1ew /ge

Christ.

7or an analysis of this plan see our earlier paper' The E"ternali%ation of the

Hierarhy: Ho& the 'lluminati are 'm#lementing Satan(s )lan for the End*Time%


19/42

14

+he &lluminati are doing everything they can to pervert the true meaning of the ,i!le.

+his includes distorting the world portrayed !y God in His Word. &t is vital that

Christians understand this that atan is almost o!liged to twist and corrupt this

aspect of the Word since it contains such an important part of God%s message to

manind. We would now nothing a!out our true origin if God in His mercy had nottold us. We should therefore study and !elieve everything He has revealed a!out our

own creation and the world we live in.

atan is continually concocting fa!les and fairy tales to explain where we came from.

/s we noted in a previous paper' The Host of Heaven and Our Stationary Earth: The

Great Cosmologial Lie' science now ass us to !elieve that the material in our

!odies was manufactured inside enormous stars that exploded as %supernovas% !illions

of years ago and spread their contents across the galaxy. +his explanation must !e

especially pleasing to atan since it effectively says that men were made !y angels

5including the fallen angels6 which are referred to as stars in the ,i!le.

& now it is difficult for many Christians to seriously contemplate the possi!ility thatthe earth is !oth flat and stationary' !ut a literal reading of the ,i!le implies exactly

that cosmology. God literally made man from the dust of the earth' just as He literally

made the earth itself' along with the sun' the moon and the stars. &f !orn-again

Christians are interpreting these truths as they are given praise the "O#$< then

why are they not also doing so with respect to those verses that deal with cosmology

5see A$$en!i= B6' which must surely !e interpreted and understood using the same

hermeneutic3

/nd if that is too much to as' then why not use some common sense3 &f the earth

was spinning on its axis at a thousand miles an hour in the so-called vacuum of spacethe centrifugal force at the 4=uator would send o!jects of all si2es careering into the

airK the sy a!ove the 4=uator would !e riven !y horrendous hurricanesK the oceans of

the world would flow in torrents across the continentsK the tectonic plates on which

the continents sit would !e su!jected to intolera!le stress' leading to devastating

earth=uaes and volcanic eruptions all over the planetK the atmosphere would !e

poisoned !y !illions of tons of volcanic gases and particles of ashK the sun would !e

completely o!scuredK and the com!ined effects of ,rownian motion and wind

tur!ulence at high altitudes would cause most of the atmosphere to !e suced into the

vacuum of space. +he earth would !e in chaos. 5ee A$$en!i= 16.


20/42

2*

+he S$ee! of #ight,efore concluding' we should loo for a moment at a scientific fact that has

!eguiled the scientific community for over a century and given invalua!le support to

the phony physics of relativity.

When the speed of light was measured experimentally it was found to !e exactly A

million meters per second< 5+he meter itself had !een defined several decades !efore

this experiment was conducted.6 1ow as yourself' what are the chances that the

speed of light should turn out to !e exactly A million times an ar!itrarily defined

unit of length' or that the unit of length should !e directly related to the path of the

sun over the 4=uator' or that the distance that light can travel in one second should !e

exactly A times the distance !etween the 1orth (ole and the 4=uator3

cientists in /merica' who used the imperial rather than the metric system of

measurement' were familiar with the speed of light in miles only' namely 9F:'miles per second. /s more of them noticed that the speed of light under the metric

system was a suspiciously round num!er' they pro!a!ly !egan to as some awward

=uestions. /s a result it has since !een officially reduced to a less suspicious 5and less

>asonic6 @@'@ ilometers per second. +he scientific esta!lishment is also trying to

hide this gargantuan coincidence !y claiming that the meter itself is defined !y

reference to this universal constant< 5+he & definition of a meter in 9@FA reads) +he

metre is the length of the path travelled !y light in vacuum during a time interval of

9@@@IBF of a second6. Encyclopedia Britannica' however' relates the correct

historical position)

+he metre was historically defined !y the

7rench /cademy of ciences in 9@9 as99'' of the =uadrant of the 4arthQs

circumference running from the 1orth (ole

through (aris to the e=uator.

Encyclopedia Britannica' 9:

8p to this time it had !een assumed 5!ut not proven6 that light acted instantaneously.

&n other words' it had no speed. ,ut' if it had no speed' then it would not !e possi!leto measure the si2e of the universe' and this in turn would mae it difficult if not

impossi!le to propose a daring new cosmology a profoundly anti-,i!lical model of

Creation in which the earth was nothing !ut an insignificant spec in a vast'

meaningless void.

>ost scientists today accept without =uestion the proposition that light has a finite'

constant universal speed and that this has !een accurately measured. +hey see no

reason to dou!t something that has seemingly !een confirmed many thousands of

times through astronomical o!servations of deep space and distant stars. However'

they overloo the fact that' while the speed of light has !een measured in a num!er of

ways' none of them are relia!le.


21/42

21

+he first method assumes that their model is correct< +he relevant measurements of c

5the speed of light6 are !ased on the supposed or!it of the earth relative to distant

celestial o!jects' such as the moons of 0upiter. ince the distance of such o!jects fromthe earth has already !een calculated !y reference to the speed of light and uses a

cosmology that already maes a num!er of assumptions a!out the speed of light' the

reasoning employed is clearly circular.

+he other main way of measuring the speed of light is nown as the %time of flight%

method. (ossi!ly the !est nown experiment using this method was the one

conducted !y >ichelson in 9@A9-AA in &rvine' California. He constructed a corrugated

metal tu!e a mile long and A feet in diameter and sent a light !eam !ac and forth

!etween a series mirrors along its length. +he measuring apparatus comprised a

revolving wheel covered with finely engineered mirrors. +he wheel revolved at B9

revolutions per second. /fter the !eam had !ounced !ac and forth along the tu!e'

covering a nown distance' it arrived again at the revolving wheel. $uring this

miniscule time interval' the wheel had rotated a very small distance' causing the !eam

to !e deflected very slightly from its path. >ichelson claimed to !e a!le to calculate

the speed of light !y reference to the angle of deflection' the speed of rotation of the

wheel' and the distance the !eam had travelled.

+his was a very crude experiment' with ample scope for error. >ichelson himself wasan unsta!le man and in poor health at the time' and yet we are expected to !ase our

understanding of the universe on his system of spinning mirrors.

+here are two further methods for measuring the speed of light. +he first is cavity

resonance' which measures the fre=uency and wavelength of an electromagnetic

standing wave in a vacuum' while the second computes the interference pattern 5and

there!y the speed of light6 !y splitting and recom!ining a !eam of laser light. +hese

are technically more precise than the method used !y >ichelson !ut they are !ased on

a paradigm that already assumes the speed of light is finite and that it lies within

certain parameters.


22/42

22

& would stress that & am speaing only as a layman' !ut the points & am raising have

!een raised !y others. Once the leading institutions of modern science decided that

the speed of light should e=ual exactly A million meters a second' the die was cast.

+hereafter they had no choice !ut to justify what they had done !y conducting

unconvincing experiments 5lie those of >ichelson6' !y devising experiments thatrelied on circular reasoning' and even !y pretending that the unit of measurement was

itself defined !y reference to the speed of light.

+o understand what was really going on we need to eep the !ig picture clearly in

mind. +he enemies of the ,i!le wanted to find a way of undermining the orderly'

purposeful structure of the universe descri!ed !y our Creator. +his meant defining a

universe in which distances were vastly exaggerated 5!y a hundred !illion !illion6. &t

also re=uired a means of expressing and manipulating these extreme distances in

consistent mathematical terms. ,y assigning a finite' constant speed to light' they had

!oth a yardstic for expressing their measurements and' !y using optical and radio

telescopes' a way of maing them seem credi!le.

he cover o Cosmos Science Fiction

and Fantasy Magazine in which the sci/

i short story, he Gurse, by rthur G

Glar7e was irst $ublished.

he story, which is billed on the cover

o the ma!a-ine, is set in the atermath

o a !lobal nuclear war that has wi$ed

out man7ind. Sel/conessed $edo$hileGlar7e was a leadin! author o nuclear

annihilation $ro$a!anda.

Notice too the ima!e o a moon/landin!

on the cover, with the earth in the bac7/

!round. his was 10 years beore the

irst $ur$orted moon/landin!. hey

were $lannin! the !reat dece$tion o

(uly 2*, 1404, as early as 14+3. his

was vol. 1 no. 1 o Cosmos, $ublished

on 1 Se$tember 14+3.

Once the universe was ar!itrarily enlarged in this way' there was no limit to how !ig

it could !e made to seem. +iny points of light could !e interpreted as galaxies many

light years across. / radio pulse that was almost impercepti!le could !e transformed

into a !lac hole so large it could swallow our entire galaxy. Once they had found a

!ridge !etween the real world and the world of mathematics' there was virtually no

limit to the si2e and variety of the celestial o!jects that they could postulate. cience

fiction too over from real science and the Great Cosmological "ie was !orn.


23/42

23

>any reputa!le scientists dismissed the new physics as !ogus' a meaningless addition

to 1ewtonian >echanics which only served to suppress the need for experimental

proof. 1iola +esla put it lie this) +odayQs scientists have su!stituted mathematics

for experiments' and they wander off through e=uation after e=uation' and eventually!uild a structure which has no relation to reality. 5%#adio (ower Will #evolutioni2e

the World% inModern Mechanix and Inentions!0uly 9@AI6

/s the Word of God says) "Ethey !elight in lies they bless with their mouth but theycurse inwar!ly%" &.salm 4(C*

Fallen men are vulnerable to !ece$tionWhen men turn their !acs on God they can !e made to !elieve the most outrageous

lies. Great lies wor !est when they fester slowly over many centuries. ,it !y !it' the

population is gulled !y reassuring promises of a future man-made utopia and vaguely

formulated statements of fact. +he next generation accepts these %facts% as esta!lishedtruth and never !others to =uestion them. +he few who do are usually dismissed as

trou!lemaers or crans. 4ven reports !y reputa!le scientists are rejected or

suppressed see A$$en!i= D.

Consider the alleged distance !etween the sun and the earth. "owexactly did they

justify in scientific terms a figure of @A million miles3 / we! service run !y Cornell

8niversity 5%/s an /stronomer%6 gives the following short explanation)

Short ersion# What we actually measure is

the distance from the 4arth to some other!ody' such as ?enus. +hen we use what we

now a!out the relations !etween

interplanetary distances to scale that to the

4arth-un distance. ince 9@:9' we have !een

a!le to use radar to measure interplanetary

distances we transmit a radar signal at

another planet 5or moon or asteroid6 and

measure how long it taes for the radar echo

to return. ,efore radar' astronomers had to

rely on other 5less direct6 geometric methods.

Dhttp)curious.astro.cornell.edua!out-usI9-our-solar-systemthe-earthor!itF-how-do-you-measure-the-

distance-!etween-earth-and-the-sun-intermediateE

/s we can see' astronomers !egin !y assuming that their heliocentric model of the

%solar system% is correct. ince that model is alreadycali!rated in tens of millions of

miles' the distance to the sun or any of the planets must !e of the same order. /s the

Cornell we!site says' the distance !etween the earth and the sun is calculated !y

reference to the distance !etween the earth and another nown celestial !ody' in this

case ?enus. ,ut this already assumes that ?enus is tens of millions of miles awayost parts of

the earth would !e su!ject continually to the awesome destructive power of super-

charged hurricanes.

Here is a simple illustration of the principle involved. 7ive motor!ies are riding in

formation' as in the diagram. +he rider on the outer !ie 5/6 has to cover a greater

distance in the same period of time as the rider of the innermost !ie 546 if he is to

remain in formation. +his means he must ride faster to eep up. /s it happens each of

the five !ies must travel at different speeds to eep in formation.


38/42

3)

&n the diagram !elow the atmosphere on circuit / is travelling much faster than the

atmosphere on circuit 4 5just lie our two motor!ies6. &t must do this in order to eep

in formation 5/s $r 7aulner says' /s the earth moves' the atmosphere moves with

itT6. &n the same way' the atmosphere at different degrees of latitude !etween / and4 must also !e moving at different speeds in order to remain in the same relative

positions. +his means that a plane flying from / to 4 would pass through consecutive

stretches of the atmosphere each of which was moving at a different speed' from 9

mph down to B mph. ,ut we now that this doesn%t happen< +ur!ulence and wind

differentials of that magnitude would mae air travel impossi!le.


39/42

34

A..6D9 D

+he Flat 6arth re$orte! by Auguste .iccar! in @/@

+he following images show how a reputa!le science maga2ine' )o#ular Siene'

carried an article in its issue of /ugust 9@A9 a!out an atmospheric ascent made !y

/uguste (iccard. 4arlier that year the wiss professor' along with his assistant'

ascended 9 miles a!ove the earth in a hot air !alloon. +he two explorers were

protected within a pressurised metal capsule suspended !eneath the !alloon. +hey

reported that the earth !eneath them seemed lie a flat dis with DanE upturned edge.

http)www.popsci.comarchive-viewer3idM,Cg$////>,/0UpgMA


40/42

&*


41/42

&1


42/42

A..6D9 6

1urvature on a 2lobe-sha$e! 6arth

$istance inmiles at sea

level

%Curvature%5/nything !elow this elevation should !e

invisi!le at that distance6

9 F inches

.B ft

A : ftI 9 ft

B 9:ft

: I ft

A ft

F I ft

@ BI ft

9 :: ft

99 F ft

9 @: ft

9A 99 ft

9I 9A ft

9B 9B ft

9: 9 ft

9 9@A ft

9F 9: ft

9@ I ft

:: ft

6=am$le) &f an island is miles offshore and its highestpoint is B ft a!ove sea level' then no part of it should !e

visi!le to someone standing on the shoreline. However'

since the earth is flat' virtually the entire island should !e

visi!le on a clear day.

how to distinguish biblical reality from satan's alternative reality

Documents