How did the Prov Govt try to solve Russia problems and why did they fail?-

Download How did the Prov Govt try to solve Russia problems and why did they fail?-

Post on 13-Jan-2016




0 download

Embed Size (px)


Why was the Provisional Government unable to deal successfully with the problems it faced in 1917? (2002). How did the Prov Govt try to solve Russia problems and why did they fail?- - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • Why was the Provisional Government unable to deal successfully with the problems it faced in 1917? (2002)Introduction- Post February- two rival bodies in Petrograd, Provisional Government and Petrograd SovietSoviet had all real power in cities- controlled transport, communications, food supplies, factories, power stationsProv Govt had authority- Given financial help and support from Allied governments.What problems did the Prov Govt face in 1917?- Before August- continuation of war, land redistribution, national minority demands for autonomy, economic troublesAfter August- Liberals moving to right, army disintegrating, food + material shortages, declining influence of moderate socialists in Soviet, no control in countryside, lawlessness in cities, rising support for BolsheviksKornilov Affair- Armed Bolshevik Military Revolutionary Committee, Kerensky lost all support, Menshevik + SRs discredited because of association w/ Kerensky. How did the Prov Govt try to solve Russia problems and why did they fail?- War- Had to continue war to get continued support from Allies. Milyukov wanted offensive war (territorial gains, Constantinople) to hasten victory, ease pressure on govt. Enraged Socialists, but agreed to Summer Offensive. Disastrous attack increased public opposition to war. Linked Mensheviks + SRs to war effort.Why it couldnt deal w/ problem- Forced to continue war by Allies, GB urged attack in East. Failure of summer offensive, propaganda in vain. Military discipline still non-existent after Feb. Led to new coalition govt w/ 5 socialists. Separate peace w/ Germ?Figes- Milyukov saw no reason to give up, secret treaty for Russian takeover of Constantinople. BUT on 27 March P.G brought out war aims, in line w/ Soviet peace calls. Milyukov forced to agree but still told allies Russia would fight on.Acton- Russia lacked leverage to force allies into peace and P.G unwilling to sue for separate peace, saw summer offensive as chance to move unruly soldiers out of Petrograd.Land redistribution- Peasants eager for land, after Feb no one could stop them taking it. Wanted P.G to approve their actions. P.G wanted Const Assem to take charge of land redistribution, wanted landowners to get compensated. Scared soldiers would leave front to grab land.

  • Land redistribution- Peasants eager for land, after Feb no one could stop them taking it. Wanted P.G to approve their actions. P.G wanted Const Assem to take charge of land redistribution, wanted landowners to get compensated. Scared soldiers would leave front to grab land.Why it failed to deal w/ problem- Landowners supported P.G, land to peasants= lose landowner support. Felt they didnt have elected authority for task this big. Chernovs compromise rejected. Land seizures rose, peasants lost faith in P.G and SRs, turned to Bolsheviks.Brovkin- P.G not to blame for land seizures, fault lay w/ Bolsheviks for whipping up peasants.Wade- P.Gs infighting over compensation for landowners meant they couldnt reach agreementNational Minorities- After Feb Finns + Poles pressed for independence, Caucasian territories wanted more autonomyUkraine (near front, good farming land) wanted self governance. Moderate socialists for Ukrainian autonomy, liberals against.Liberals thought would lead to break up of RussiaWhy it failed to deal w/ problem- PG infighting led to people losing faith in PG, Bolsh seen as only alternativeFiges- Resignation of 3 Kadet ministers over Ukraine issue caused political crisis that eventually ended P.G.Economic Problems- Economic woes forced Tsar out, but problems did not go away w/ PG.Factories closed, 100,000 jobs lost, price of manufactured goods up, wages below inflationFood shortages- Grain prices up 100%, bad harvest, PG unable to do anythingWhy it failed to deal w/ problem- Not much could be done while war continued. Had to hope for swift victory. Tried to seize grain off peasants, made them more angry. Bolsh policies seemed to be only alternative-Peace. Bread. LandAfter August- Lvov resigned, Kerensky PM. Seen as last hope. Figes- Kerensky was undisputed leader of people.Many political problems, Right wing Liberals, Bolsh support rising (radicalised workers), Moderate socialists out of touch with peopleSocial problems- Chaos in cities, violence in countryside, soldiers deserting front, prices of goods and foods risingWhat Kerensky did- Wanted to continue war, territorial losses, had to find military leader to restore order, didnt want to violently suppress Bolsh, did nothing w/ economy. Led to Kornilov Affair.Conclusion- When PG came to power faced with very tough issues, would have been very hard for any govt to deal withAlso PG was temporary body, didnt have power to enforce decisions, too much expected in short time?, Russia still in state of anarchy after Feb.However PG made mistakes that led to its downfall- Kadets blocked major decisions, if theyd let decisions through poularity might have been high enough to last out war + Const Assem elections.BUT- Continued aggressive war, blocked Chernovs land compromise, sided w/ factory workers, didnt improve economyBiggest mistake- being implicated in Kornilov affair, after that PG helplessKenez- PG couldnt defend itself from Bolsh

  • How important were the contributions of Lenin and Trotsky in bringing about the October revolution?Introduction April theses, July days, Trotsky becoming president of the Soviet, Lenin's push for seizure of power, Trotskys planning of the revolutionBut other reasons for revolution disillusioned with PG, The War, Land Redistribution, Failure to reform factories, Kornilov, Failure of other socialist parties, Luck??

    Provisional Government Divisions between socialist and liberalsKenez- PG have lost all power and authorityTemporary body Waiting for elections, Decisions to continue war, Summer Offensive, nothing done about economyRabinowitch all other parties lost credibility because of Kerensky, Bolshevik support increased dramaticallyBolsheviks Only opposition PG, oppose war, supported by peasants In tune with workers and soldiers, power to SovietsPonomarev workers in guise of soviets took powerLenin's April theses gave Bolsheviks directionLenin Strong determined leadership, forced key policies on BolsheviksSimple policies appealed to tired Russians Peace, Bread Land. Only party not affiliated to PG, seen as only alternativeAll Power to Soviets appealed to political charged proletariatMade Bolsheviks organised and Disciplined but Lenin plotted to take power for himself??Pipes Lenin and Trotsky slyly took power. Classic coup d'tat Trotsky Leader of Petrograd Soviet, head of Military Revolution Committee, best orator in partyPersuaded Lenin to delay revolution Made it look like Soviets supported BolsheviksService MRC and Petrograd Soviet controlled cities soldiers, workers in red guard armed and committed.Organised Rev- Pipes Putsch organised by Trotsky- surgical strikes. Myth of Bolsh surging to power on wave of popular support. Luck Military and Economic Collapse in the summer played into Bolsheviks hands. Radicalised workers confused between power to Soviet and power to BolsheviksFiges Revolution took place amid social revolution that was centred on Soviet taking powerProvisional Government gave Bolsheviks excuse for action, rose bridges to workers districts in PetrogradConclusion - people wanted soviet power, Bolsheviks identified with this aimActon Popular support, for soviet power forced Kerensky out, explains why Bolsheviks took power so easilyLenin and Trotsky played a key role April theses, planning revolution, MRC, policies appealed to wide range of RussiansBut other reasons for revolution taking place Anger at government, Situation played into Bolshevik hands

  • To what extent can the decline of the Provisional Government be dated from the July days?Introduction July days- uncontrolled rioting in Petrograd against government, encouraged by BolsheviksLenin did not actively lead the uprising, created lack of leadership, July days were not successfulLeading Bolsheviks arrested, Lenin in hiding, looked like Bolsheviks would not recoverSome historians say PG could have held onto power after July days, others believe they were doomed before then.2 Main ViewpointsBolsh seizure of power was inevitable before July Days- were only opposition to mod. socialists + Libs, true aspirations of workers and soldiers. The PG was already doomed.The July Days could have been turning point. Bolsh should have been crushed. But PGs mistakes after July were the main reason for their downfall.The PG were finished before JulyWar- Soldiers + maj of pop against war. Summer Offensive. Caused political crisis (resignation of Milyukov)- Bolsh called for peaceLand- Peasants angry over govts indecision over land redistribution, Bolsh called for landCities- People feeling pinch of economic hardship. No improvement since Feb. Job losses, food shortages- Bolsh called for bread.BUT- people still willing to put up with PG?, July Moscow elections, Bolsh only 4th largest party, mod socialists + libs still in controlJuly Days- Bolsh focus for revolutionary activities. End war, help workers, social reform, prioritising food suppliesRioting in Petrograd, vented frustration at govt. Capital defenceless (shows people not prepared to come out in defence of PG)Encouraged by low level Bolshies, BUT Lenin decide to sit back and see what would happenWithout clear purpose, rising lost momentum.After JulyProblems still getting worse- war continued, economy ruined, no law, anarchy in streets, no military disciplineMain event- Kornilov Affair, Kornilov sent loyal troops into Petrograd, tried to overthrow PGBolsh came to aid of Kerensky, Red guard supplied w/ weapons, MRC set up- Kornilov failed, soldiers persuaded to give upConsequences- Kerensky lost all support, Mensh + SRs discredited for association w/ Kerensky, Masses distrusted liberals, Soldiers wouldnt fight for PG, Bolsh support grew massively, took Moscow + Petrograd Soviet, Trotsky leader of Petrograd SovietBy October inevitable Bolsh would take power- control of soviet, most popular ever, liberals + mod socialists in tatters, PG helpless

  • Power vacuum created by Kornilov, Len pressed for uprising, led up to RevKerenskys final blundersTried to send radical army units out of capital, allowed MRC to control soldiers, shut down Bolsh newspapers, closed bridges between working class districts and city centre- gave Bolsh excuse for actionPeace, bread, land Is this an adequate explanation of the October Revolution?Assessing main causes of October Rev- Peace, Bread, Land Peace- End to war- After Summer Offensive majority of pop opposed war, soldiers deserted en-masse, Bolsh call for peace very popular amongst soldiers + regular citizens.Figes- The soldiers were so obsessed with the idea of peace that they would have supported the Tsar if he had promised an end to the war.PG continued war despite unpopularity, Bolsh seen as only real opposition to PGBread- End to food shortages, economic problems. Cities had no food, 500% price increase in bread prices, 770% price increase in pork. Peasants wouldnt give enough grain to PG. War meant key supplies diverted to army.Angered people in cities, couldnt afford food. Peasants angry, forced to give up grain by soldiers. Things no better since Feb.Bolsh promised bread. Could be achieved by immediate peace. People desperate for solution, Bolsh support grewLand- Bolsh struck chord w/ peasants. Wanted to redistribute land to peasants.PG stalled over compensation to landowners, scared of land free-for-all.Chernov wanted temporary solution, let peasants get access to land while owners still kept it- blocked by liberalsOnce again Bolsh seen as only alternative to failing PG- popularity rose, Bolsh took maj in Petrograd + Moscow SovietsPeace, Bread and land were some of key issues for bolsh popularity to rise, and PGs disintegration. Meant when rev broke out it was very easy for Bolsh to take control. But there were other reasons for the revs outbreak.Political- Coalition govt, bickering between Kadets + socialists. PG out of touch w/ people. Liberals moving to right. PG felt it didnt have remit to deal with problems, waiting for Const Assem elections.Social- Increasing lawlessness in cities, land seizures up, army disintegrating,How PG dealt w/ situation- Unwilling to end war, territory losses too costly, Kerensky appointed Kornilov to restore law and order (see Kornilov affair), scared of rioting if he tried to suppress Bolsh violently, couldnt help economy while war continued.Kerenskys Errors- summer offensive, Kornilov affair left him discredited, Allowed Bolsh strength to rebuild after July Days

  • What Was October?Looking at how October can be viewed- popular revolution, coup dtat, planned, spontaneousPopular Revolution- Widespread support for Bolsheviks after Feb- Membership in Feb 10,000. October 250,000.PG lost all popularity- Summer Offensive, no land redistribution, no social reform in cities, food shortagesLenins return in April changed everything- dramatic entrance at Finland station, charismatic leader to focus revolutionary activitiesApril Theses- worldwide socialist rev, immediate end to war, end to co-operation w/ PG, power to Soviet, land for peasantsPeace, Bread, Land, All Power to Soviet- simple, key policies that appealed to massesEstablished Bolsheviks as opposition to PG- had purpose, plan- radically different, stood out from the restJuly Days- showed large number of normal people angry at PG, not many keen to defend itKerensky- didnt deal w/ Bolsheviks well enough, PG disunited, army continued to breakdown, KORNILOV AFFAIRAfter Kornilov PG doomed, Bolsh support huge, armed Red Guard- rev only a matter of timeRabinowitch- Everyone wanted an end to PG after KornilovWhen Oct Rev happened, Bolsh took power with amazing ease, no one would help PG, on the whole rev supported by massesWilliams- rev enthusiastically supported by workers + accepted by peasantsCoup dtat- Bolsh support was not because of their policies, but other parties failuresBolshevik support came because they were affiliated with Power to Soviets, had dictatorship in mind whole time- deceived RussiaRabinowitch- supporters deceived. Expected creation of govt w/ all socialist parties, not Bolsh dictatorship.Failure of PG and situation of anarchy in Russia created power vacuum that Bolsh took advantage of itKenez- country in anarchy- Bolsh took advantageNot a revolution- planned by Lenin + Trotsky, armed uprising, series of tactical strikes against key points- bridges, telephone exchanges (meant counterattack impossible), railway stations, power stations, finally Winter PalacePipes- Len + Trot slyly took power, classic coup, scheduled- proves it wasnt a real rev, (see other Pipes quotes for more coup)Insurrection. only in cities- very fragile hold on power, if theyd been popular they would have had much firmer grip on powerTrotsky- (Bolsh dictatorship...


View more >