houston housing market
DESCRIPTION
The Houston Housing market as of 6/2010.TRANSCRIPT
Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land AreaLocal Market Report, First Quarter 2010
Local Trend
Today's Market…
3-year (12-quarter) Appreciation (2010 Q1)
Prices are above the level from 12 months ago and growing-0.5%1-year (4-quarter) Appreciation (2010 Q1) 8.4%
-22 1%2 0%
Current Median Home Price (2010 Q1)
U.S.Price Activity
Houston
$150,100 $166,733
$0$20,000$40,000$60,000$80,000
$100,000$120,000$140,000$160,000$180,000
-8%-6%-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%10%12%
2010 Q1
Q32009 Q1
Q32008 Q1
Q32007 Q1
Q32006 Q1
Q32005 Q1
Q32004 Q1
Q32003 Q1
Q32002 Q1
Q32001 Q1
Median Price (Red Line) and One-year Price Growth
State Existing Home Sales (2010 Q1 vs 2009 Q1)
Most buyers in this market have access to government-backed finacingFHA Loan Limit $271,050
11.4%
$417,000Conforming Loan Limit*
3-year (12-quarter) Appreciation (2010 Q1)
U.S.Home Sales TexasSales growth during the first quarter
remains sluggish
$2,9007-year (28 quarters) Housing Equity Gain
$729,250
*Note: the 2009 loan limits for FHA and the GSEs were extended through 2010.36%
5.8%
-$47,333$20,900 -$467
3-year (12-quarter) Housing Equity Gain-22.1%2.0%
$31,800
This area has held onto a modest improvement in equity despite the
national market decline$22,733
not comparable
$417,000
9-year (36 quarters) Housing Equity Gain
Local Median to Conforming Limit Ratio
$0$20,000$40,000$60,000$80,000
$100,000$120,000$140,000$160,000$180,000
-8%-6%-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%10%12%
2010 Q1
Q32009 Q1
Q32008 Q1
Q32007 Q1
Q32006 Q1
Q32005 Q1
Q32004 Q1
Q32003 Q1
Q32002 Q1
Q32001 Q1
Median Price (Red Line) and One-year Price Growth
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
-25%-20%-15%-10%-5%0%5%10%15%20%25%
2010 Q1
Q32009 Q1
Q32008 Q1
Q32007 Q1
Q32006 Q1
Q32005 Q1
Q32004 Q1
Q32003 Q1
Q32002 Q1
Q32001 Q1
State Home Sales (Red Line) and Sales Growth1,000s
(2010 Q1 vs 2009 Q1) remains sluggish
$0$20,000$40,000$60,000$80,000
$100,000$120,000$140,000$160,000$180,000
-8%-6%-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%10%12%
2010 Q1
Q32009 Q1
Q32008 Q1
Q32007 Q1
Q32006 Q1
Q32005 Q1
Q32004 Q1
Q32003 Q1
Q32002 Q1
Q32001 Q1
Median Price (Red Line) and One-year Price Growth
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
-25%-20%-15%-10%-5%0%5%10%15%20%25%
2010 Q1
Q32009 Q1
Q32008 Q1
Q32007 Q1
Q32006 Q1
Q32005 Q1
Q32004 Q1
Q32003 Q1
Q32002 Q1
Q32001 Q1
State Home Sales (Red Line) and Sales Growth1,000s
#N/A #N/A Natural 13.6%
Natural Resour 3.8% 87.7 Natural 0.5%
Construction 7 3% 168 1 Constru 4 2%
Not Comparable
-19,400
9.7%
-4.0%
8.6%
Unemployment has risen since the same period last year, but Houston's labor
market has been more resilient than the national average8.5%
U.S.
Not Comparable
12-month Job Change (Feb)
Job losses are a problem and will weigh on demand, but layoffs are declining which could help buyer confidence
12-month Job Change (Mar) -60,200
Year-ago Unemployment Rate
U.S.Local Economic Outlook
Not Comparable
Drivers of Local Supply and Demand…
Houston
6.8%
1-year (12 month) Job Growth Rate -2.3%
-77,900
36-month Job Change (Mar)
Current Unemployment Rate (Mar)
Weak, but better than most markets
Share of Total Employment by IndustryHouston-Baytown-Sugar Land Area
Trade/Transportation/Uti
lities22.2%Other
Services4 0%
Government
16.6%
Trade/Transportation/U
tilities8.9%
Other Services10.0%
Government
4.1%
Construction 7.3% 168.1 Constru 4.2%
Trade/Transpo 22.2% 508.3 Trade/T 8.9%
Information 1.5% 33.2 Informa18.8%
Financial Act 6.0% 137 Financi2.1%
Prof. & Busin 15.2% 347.8 Profess5.8%
Educ. & Heal 13.3% 303.7 Educat 12.8%
Leisure & Ho 10.2% 233.1 Leisure15.1%
Other Service 4.0% 91.2 Other S10.0%
Government 16.6% 378.9 Govern4.1%
Prof. & Business Services -16,80012,300-1,900-1,0005,400
NA-1,300
-23,100-12,700-2,000-3,100
Educ. & Health ServicesLeisure & HospitalityOther Services
U.S.
12-month Employment Change by Industry in the Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land Area
Natural Resources/Mining/Construct
GovernmentFinancial Activities
Natural Resources and MiningConstructionTrade/Transportation/Utilities
-1.2%
-5.6%
The economy of Texas is weaker than the rest of the nation, but improved
modestly from last month
Texas
-4.3%
-2.1%
36-month change (2010 - Mar)
12-month change (2010 - Mar)
State Economic Activity Index
Information
Trade/Transportation/Uti
lities22.2%
Information1.5%
Financial Activities
6.0%
Prof. & Business Services15.2%
Educ. & Health
Services13.3%
Leisure & Hospitality
10.2%
Other Services
4.0%
Government
16.6%
Trade/Transportation/U
tilities8.9%
Information18.8%
Financial Activities
2.1%
Professional &
Business Services
5.8%
Educational & Health Services12.8%
Leisure & Hospitality
15.1%
Other Services10.0%
Government
4.1%
The current level of construction is 39.0% below the long-term average
-6.1%
not comparable
U.S.Houston
39,817
24,275 not comparable
Construction
Construction is down from last year, but appears to have bottomed.
Reduced construction will limit new supply to the market, allowing demand to
catch up with current supply and foreclosures more quickly
-0.4%Single-Family Housing Permits (Mar 2010) 12-month sum vs. a year ago
Local Fundamentals
12-month Sum of 1-unit Building Permits through Mar 2010
Long-term average for 12-month Sum of 1-Unit Building Permits
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Construction: 12-month Sum of Local Housing Permits (Historical Average Shown in Red Dashed Line)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Construction: 12-month Sum of Local Housing Permits (Historical Average Shown in Red Dashed Line)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Construction: 12-month Sum of Local Housing Permits (Historical Average Shown in Red Dashed Line)
Monthly Mortgage Payment to Income
22.6% More affordable than most markets
7.9%Houston
7.7%10.7%
Ratio for 2008Ratio for 2010 Q1Historical Average
14.4%
U.S.15.3% Historically strong, but weaker than the
fourth quarter of 2009
Affordability
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2009200720052003200119991997199519931991
Ratio of Local Mortgage Servicing Cost to Income (Local Historical Average Shown in Red, U.S. Average in Green)
Ratio for 2010 Q12.4
Houston
1.3
Ratio for 2009
Historical Average
Median Home Price to Income
1.2
2.7 Affordable compared to most markets2.21.2
Local affordability has improved, but could be better
U.S.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2009200720052003200119991997199519931991
Ratio of Local Mortgage Servicing Cost to Income (Local Historical Average Shown in Red, U.S. Average in Green)
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2010 Q12009 Q42009 Q32009 Q22009 Q12008 Q42008 Q32008 Q2
Recent Trend - Local Mortgage Servicing Cost to Income(Historical Average Shown in Red Dashed Line)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2009200720052003200119991997199519931991
Ratio of Local Mortgage Servicing Cost to Income (Local Historical Average Shown in Red, U.S. Average in Green)
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2010 Q12009 Q42009 Q32009 Q22009 Q12008 Q42008 Q32008 Q2
Recent Trend - Local Mortgage Servicing Cost to Income(Historical Average Shown in Red Dashed Line)
The Mortgage Market
2 5
3.06.57.0
30-year Fixed Mortgage Rate and Treasury Bond Yield (%)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009200720052003200119991997199519931991
Ratio of Local Median Home Price to Local Average Income (Local Historical Average Shown in Red, U.S. Average in Green)
Signs of economic strength during the first quarter pressed up on the 10-year Treasury yield, while Fed purchases of mortgage backed securities helped to keep long-term mortgage rates low. The spread between the 30-year fixed rate mortgage and the 10-year Treasury continued to shrink through the first quarter of 2010 as a result. In the first two months of the second quarter, new concerns about domestic employment growth and international banking issues have sent investors clamoring to long-term Treasuries for safety, easing inflation concerns (temporarily) and sending the yield sliding. Private demand for mortgage backed securities rose in wake of the Treasury's cessation of its mortgage purchase program, muting upward pressure on long-term mortgage rates. Figures for the second quarter, due out in a few months, will likely show a flat or slightly wider spread between the 10-year Treasury and 30-year FRM. The debt crisis in Greece and fear of a contagion have caused long-term Treasury yields to tumble as nervous investors sought a shelter. The decline in the Treasury yield has not been matched by moderating mortgage rates leading to a increase in the spread.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.0
2010 Q1Q32009 Q1Q32008 Q1Q32007 Q1Q32006 Q1Q32005 Q1
30-year Fixed Mortgage Rate and Treasury Bond Yield (%)
Spread (left axis) 30-Year FRM (Right axis) 10-Year Treasury Bond (Right Axis)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009200720052003200119991997199519931991
Ratio of Local Median Home Price to Local Average Income (Local Historical Average Shown in Red, U.S. Average in Green)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.0
2010 Q1Q32009 Q1Q32008 Q1Q32007 Q1Q32006 Q1Q32005 Q1
30-year Fixed Mortgage Rate and Treasury Bond Yield (%)
Spread (left axis) 30-Year FRM (Right axis) 10-Year Treasury Bond (Right Axis)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009200720052003200119991997199519931991
Ratio of Local Median Home Price to Local Average Income (Local Historical Average Shown in Red, U.S. Average in Green)
Monthly Market Data
Foreclosures by Type
Looking Deeper….
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
State Total Foreclosure Rate vs. U.S Average(U.S. Average in Blue Dashed Line)
Source: Mortgage Bankers' Association
85.8% 3.2% 11.0% 88.5% 5.2% 6.3%
1.3% 2.7%
0.9% 2.3%
8.2% 17.9%
7.1% 18.0%
4.6% 14.8%
4.2% 14.5%
Source: First American CoreLogic, LoanPerformance data
The February rate for Houston is low compared to the national average
The "foreclosure + REO rate" is the number of mortgages, by metro area, that are either in the foreclosure process or have completed the foreclosure process and are owned by banks divided by the total number of mortgages for that area.
ALT-A: Foreclosure + REO
Rate
A large local increase occurred compared to August of last year
Compared to the national average, today's local rate is low
There was a substantial increase versus August of this year
SUBPRIME: Foreclosure + REO
Rate
Monthly Market Data - February 2010
PRIME: Foreclosure + REO
Rate
Market Share: Prime (blue), Alt-A
(green), and Subprime (red)
Locally, today's foreclosure rate is low relative to the national average
There has been a large local increase versus a year ago
Delinquencies by TypeU.S.
The Houston market has a lower share of subprime loans than the average market,
but rising prime foreclosures are becoming a problem
Houston
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
State Total Foreclosure Rate vs. U.S Average(U.S. Average in Blue Dashed Line)
Source: Mortgage Bankers' Association
1.3%
0.9%
Feb-10Aug-09
2.7%2.3%
Feb-10Aug-09
8.2%7.1%
Feb-10Aug-09
4.6%4.2%
Feb-10Aug-09
17.9%
18.0%
Feb-10Aug-09
14.8%14.5
%
Feb-10Aug-09
85.8%
3.2% 11.0%
88.5%
5.2%
6.3%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
State Total Foreclosure Rate vs. U.S Average(U.S. Average in Blue Dashed Line)
Source: Mortgage Bankers' Association
1.3%
0.9%
Feb-10Aug-09
2.7%2.3%
Feb-10Aug-09
8.2%7.1%
Feb-10Aug-09
4.6%4.2%
Feb-10Aug-09
17.9%
18.0%
Feb-10Aug-09
14.8%14.5
%
Feb-10Aug-09
85.8%
3.2% 11.0%
88.5%
5.2%
6.3%
5.4% 4.5% 4.0% 7.6% 6.3% 4.9%
4.2% 3.3% 3.0% 6.5% 5.2% 3.8%
1.3% 0.9% 0.7% 2.7% 2.3% 1.7%
Source: First American CoreLogic LoanPerformance data
Houston U.S.Monthly Market Data - February 2010
Prime Foreclosures and Delinquencies in Process
Prime: 60-day Delinquent
Prime: 90-day Delinquent
The share of local 60-day delinquencies rose suggesting that the 90-day
delinquency rate is likely to rise in the near future
Houston's 90-day delinquency rate climbed faster than the national average suggesting a bulge of foreclosures in the
future
Rising 60 and 90-day delinquency rates will press up on local prime foreclosures
rates in the near future.
Prime: Foreclosure +
REO Rate
5.4%
4.5%
4.0%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
7.6%6.3%4.9%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
6.5%5.2%3.8%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
1.3%0.9
%0.7%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
2.7%2.3%1.7%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
4.2%3.3%3.0%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
Source: First American CoreLogic, LoanPerformance data
Austin County, Brazoria County, Chambers County, Fort Bend County, Galveston County, Harris County, Liberty County, Montgomery County, San Jacinto County, and Waller County
More information on the OMB's geographic definitions can be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_statpolicy/
The Houston area referred to in this report covers the geographic area of the Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land metro area as officially defined by the Office of Management and Budget of the U.S. Government. The official coverage area includes the
following counties:
Geographic Coverage
5.4%
4.5%
4.0%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
7.6%6.3%4.9%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
6.5%5.2%3.8%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
1.3%0.9
%0.7%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
2.7%2.3%1.7%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09
4.2%3.3%3.0%
Feb-10Aug-09Feb-09