horizonscans+++
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Joining Horizon ScansJoining Horizon Scans
Thinking, debating and shaping the Future
Victor van RijTowards Knowledge Democracy
25-27 August, 2009, Leiden
2
Foresight and Horizon scanningForesight and Horizon scanning
Brief explanation horizon scanning
Joint Horizon scan project (ERA Net For society)
Theory on Horizon scanning
Relation of Horizon scanning with Knowledge Democracy, Problems , Ideas for solutions
Some remarks about foresight and horizon scanning
Foresight is not about forecasting nor fortune telling. Some issues can be predicted (and will happen), others can be foreseen (and may happen) , others we cannot foresee.
If we foresee things that may happen we can just allow these to happen or not to happen (let history take its course) and deal with the consequences, but we might also think of ways (actions, strategies policies) to accelerate things to happen or to slow them down alter them or to prevent them to happen at all.
Already, by debating things that will happen in combination with things that may happen we may already have changed the way of history, because actors involved in a foresight process will think and probably act differently (than without the foresight)
So foresight is about shaping and creating future more to our willand to activate and align people and to coordinate there actions
4
Horizon scanning and Foresight
Instruments to shape the future to (common) desires, needs after participative thinking and debating
Horizon scanning
Systematic Search for Issues with Potential high (Future) Impact on what we consider to be important
Issues are statements about the future, based on outcomes of research, trend analysis, scenario studies, weak or faint signal analysis but also on our imagination
Issues are therefore based on a mix of scientific knowledge and tacit knowledge including our imagination
Horizon scanningHorizon scanning
5
Horizon scanning methods, outcomes
Methods
- Literature, website & blog surveys, interviews, brainstorms, expert and stakeholder meetings, essays
Outcomes
-Listings and descriptions of issues with impact on our future – websites publications
-Analysis of interaction of issues and their combined impact (clusters of issues (NE) or concentrated to test departmental strategies on resilience (UK)) recommendations (NE)
- Process outcomes (learning effects participants etc)
Horizon scanningHorizon scanning
6
Foresight and Horizon scanningForesight and Horizon scanning
Joint Horizon scan project (ERA Net For society)
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
7
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
8
Joint Horizon scan / comparisonJoint Horizon scan / comparison
Three national Horizon scans :
UK: Horizon Scanning Centre GOS
NE : Netherlands Horizon Scan COS / Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
DK : Danish Horizon Scan / OECD-Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation (DASTI)
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
9
Foresight and Horizon scanningForesight and Horizon scanning
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
10
ComparisonComparison
Main aims of the National Horizon Scans
Feeding the (evidence) base of policies(UK)
Feeding the foresight agenda (NE), foster the future thinking culture of policymakers (UK)
Feeding the knowledge and research agenda (DK , NE)
(implicit targets more resilient policies, sustainable solutions)
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
11
Joint Horizon Scan comparisonJoint Horizon Scan comparison
Distribution of the selected issues over the main domains
Category United Kingdom Denmark Netherlands total
Society 18,5 22,4 7,5 15,6
Science & technology 16,4 8,8 15,1 13,7
Economy/Finance 21,2 21,6 18,9 20,5
Environment/Ecology 13,7 15,2 23,3 17,7
Politics/Public services 30,1 32,0 35,2 32,6
total number of issues 146 125 159 430
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
12
ComparisonComparison
Different aims , slightly different methods , potential multi functionality of the instrument
Wide scopes (all STEEP areas are covered – although different distribution of issues) , opening up new ideas on relations between issues
Large overlap of issues, level of granulation comparable, attempts to characterise the issues on impact, probability etc
Embedded (UK, NE?, DK??)
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
13
Common problemsCommon problems
How to be effective? Client orientation?
Who selects and prioritises the issues (values, criteria, value conflicts) – connections to other scans (on different levels, on different policy domains, worldwide) ?
Facts, proven facts and desires (scientific quality) ?
Complexity (non linearity, issue interaction, unknown effects of interference, conflicting values)
The unknowns , weak signals, evaluation of the method
Joint Horizon scanJoint Horizon scan
14
Foresight and Horizon scanningForesight and Horizon scanning
Theory on Horizon scanning
15
Issue dimensions
IMPACT : Issues that may have great or less great impact on what we see as important (seize of impact)
PROBABILITY & PLAUSIBILITY : Issues that are certain or less certain but still plausible (probability and plausibility)
DESIRABILITY : Issues that are desirable or not desirable for society (desirability, common or opposed values)
CHANGEABILITY : Issues that are not changeable or changeable by human action (changeability)
TIME : moment of observation , interaction, dynamics
Some theorySome theory
16
+ Issues with Potential high Impact on what we consider to be important
certainty
desirability
changeability
Climate Change
Nuclear War
NBIC convergence
The Internet
Migration
Ageing society
Some theorySome theory
17
Desires/Values
1. Biological dimension : Quality of life, Health, Ecological Quality
2. Social dimension : Social Quality
3. Economic financial dimension: Economic Quality
4. Governmental dimension : Juridical and Democratic Quality
5. Cultural, ethical and intellectual dimension : Cultural, ethical and intellectual Quality
6. Self realization of (future) citizens, freedom of individuals and of religious and cultural expression
7. Social cohesion, Good neighborhood dimension : International relationship Quality
Some theorySome theory
18
Example (2005)Climate change (theory, trends, signals)
Plausibility highEstimated Impact high3vDesirability lowIssue Changeable? LimitedImpact changeable? Perhaps
Some theorySome theory
19
certainty
changeability
desirability
Climate Change Adaptation
Mitigation
Some theorySome theory
20
Foresight and Horizon scanningForesight and Horizon scanning
Relation of Horizon scanning with Knowledge Democracy, Problems , Ideas for solutions
21
Importance for knowledge democracy
Horizon/trend scans are performed more and more on many placesSometimes through participative processes but also by small expert groups
Although the importance for public governance is neglected by many, there is a silent influence on the agenda setting (what are the important issues)
Good horizon scanning needs democratic/participative processes
A knowledge democracy may be served by good horizon scanning processes which could be the centre point of good governance on many governance levels
Relation Knowledge DemocracyRelation Knowledge Democracy
22
1. Meaning of HS for democracy
Feeding the Public debate for agenda setting and scoping of further deliberation, relating this to the research agenda
Input for policy / decision makers to develop resilient and sustainable policies
But:
How to reach the busy decision makers ?
How to overcome the dilemma of “present day agenda” and “simple incidents” versus “ long term strategy on complex sets of issues”
How do we get attention and time of the decision makers (time for the future) ,
Relation Knowledge DemocracyRelation Knowledge Democracy
23
2. Meaning of democracy for good HS
Identification of issues: What do we see as important (what are the values that we take into account to select issues)
Estimations of plausibility and of impact of an issue (collective responsability)
Changeability : The possibility and willingness to change the issues or to react upon the supposed impact by deliberate human action
Relation Knowledge DemocracyRelation Knowledge Democracy
24
Solutions for 1.
Classical Solutions
Involvement of HL (or key) decision makers in the process (EC Far horizon)
“client oriented “ foresight (only foresight on demand of decision makers)
Relation Knowledge DemocracyRelation Knowledge Democracy
25
Solutions for 1.
Classical Solutions
Or do we need
other institutional arrangements
considering the fact that “Good governance requires foreseeing” we should review or governmental institutions on their foreseeing capacity:
“Chamber for incidental policy” and a “Chamber for long term policy” ?
Remove barriers for trans disciplinary research, stimulate this where necessary
Relation Knowledge DemocracyRelation Knowledge Democracy
26
Solutions for 2.
Participative processes to set the criteria for identification and priority setting of Issues (CIVICS)
Participative processes to feed in issues (wiki’s, blogs) (SESTI)
Involvement of HL decision makers in the process (champions)
Relation Knowledge DemocracyRelation Knowledge Democracy