hinckley and bosworth borough council playing pitch ... · hinckley and bosworth borough: playing...

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council

Playing Pitch Strategy Assessment Report

March 2019

Neil Allen Associates Registered Office:

20 Brook Road, Lymm, Cheshire, WA139AH

A limited company, registered in

England and Wales no. 616528

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjMgcjG5vHcAhWyzIUKHV3UBn0QjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http://logos.wikia.com/wiki/Hinckley_%26_Bosworth_Borough_Council&psig=AOvVaw0MN3n4PqTv4MXvAVJcZnOr&ust=1534516759995896

Contents

Section 1: Introduction 1

Section 2: Methodology 4

Section 3: Strategic Context 10

Section 4: Cricket 20

Section 5: Bowls 51

Section 6: Tennis 73

Section 7: Golf 92

Section 8 Hockey 111

Section 9 Rugby 122

Section 10 Football 139

Section 11 Summary 213

1: Introduction

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough: Playing Pitch Strategy Assessment Report 1

Introduction

1.1 In June 2017, Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council, (HBBC) working in partnership with Sport

England, and the National Governing Bodies of Sport, commissioned naa to produce a Playing

Pitch Strategy for the period 2018 - 2036 (this will cover the Local Plan period 2016 - 2036).

1.2 The strategy covers the sports of football, cricket, rugby, golf, hockey, tennis and bowls.

1.3 This document is the assessment report. It summarises the key issues arising from the assessment

of facilities and informs the preparation of the strategy document (under separate cover). For

each of the sports covered, it aims to;

summarise the current supply of facilities;

outline current demand and evaluate likely future demand;

evaluate the overall adequacy of provision to meet current and projected future demand;

and

identify the key issues for the Playing Pitch Strategy to address.

1.4 The strategy document will build on the issues identified and set out strategic priorities and

actions for delivery.

Key Drivers

1.5 HBBC and partners are developing a playing pitch strategy for the following reasons;

to ensure that the provision of outdoor sports facilities is planned for holistically, and that

the needs of the current and future population of the Borough can be fully met;

to inform the review of the local plan - the existing core strategy, area action plans, site

allocations and development management policies DPDs are under review and a new plan

will set out how the borough of Hinckley and Bosworth will grow and develop up to 2036 -

the strategy will inform this document;

to provide a robust evidence base and data set, to inform future planning on all levels, from

strategic to neighbourhood planning;

to inform and support the determination of relevant planning applications. The strategy will

also help identify priorities that can assist the collection and allocation of developer

contributions; maximising the benefits for sport and active recreation;

to provide an evidence base to support funding bids to National Sports bodies like Sport

England and National Governing Bodies (NGBs) of sport, as well as regional and local

funders; for the delivery of sports and recreational facilities in the Borough;

to inform Hinckley and Bosworth internal capital spending on the provision and

management of playing pitches;

to support improvements to pitches and other sports facilities across the borough, both

within the urban areas and in the more rural outlying Parishes; and


To help promote sports development.

Vision and Objectives

1.6 The strategy (and this assessment report, which supports the strategy document) seeks to

support HBBC and its partners in attaining its vision for outdoor sports, which is that:

The Playing Pitch Strategy will help secure access to high quality opportunities for sport and

recreation across the borough, contributing to the improvement of the health and well-being of

communities. The Strategy will help to ensure that the planning policies in the Hinckley and

Bosworth Local Plan are based on a robust and up-to-date assessment of the needs for outdoor

sports facilities.

1.7 To achieve the strategic vision, the strategy therefore seeks to deliver the following objectives;

Strategic

Help improve health and well-being and increase participation in sport

Ensure a strategic approach to playing pitch and outdoor sports facility provision.

Planning

Inform the development and implementation of planning policy by adding to the evidence

base for the review of the Local Plan and associated documents

Inform the assessment of planning applications that affect playing fields or propose

creation of new facilities

Improve evidence to help protect and enhance existing provision.

Operational

Improve current asset management to ensure the most efficient management and

maintenance of playing pitch provision

Understand the use of current, lapsed and disused sites to determine whether the current

maintenance and management regimes are appropriate or require change.

Sports Development

Identify where community use of school sports pitches is feasible and most needed to

address any identified deficits in pitch provision

Promote sports development and unlock latent demand by identifying where the lack of

facilities might be suppressing the formation of teams / community needs

Help identify future trends in sports provision and align this to need.


1.8 The remainder of this assessment report is set out as follows;

Section 2: Methodology - this section sets out the methodology undertaken

Section 3: Strategic Context - this section summarises the key issues in the borough

relating to demographics, health and wellbeing and the facility implications

Section 4: Cricket - this section outlines the current picture for cricket and evaluates the

adequacy of existing provision to meet current and projected future demand

Section 5: Bowls - this section outlines the current picture for bowls and evaluates the


Section 6: Tennis - this section outlines the current picture for tennis and evaluates the


Section 7:Golf - this section outlines the current picture for golf and evaluates the


Section 8: Hockey - this section outlines the current picture for hockey and evaluates the


Section 9: Rugby - this section outlines the current picture for rugby and evaluates the


Section 10: Football - this section outlines the current picture for football and evaluates

the adequacy of existing provision to meet current and projected future demand

Section 11: Summary – this section provides a summary of the key issues arising for each

sport that will need to be addressed by the strategy document.

2: Methodology


Introduction

2.1 This section summarises the methodology that has been used in the preparation of this assessment

report and the strategy document that is under separate cover. This assessment and strategy has

been produced in line with ‘Playing Pitch Guidance, An approach to Developing and Delivering a

Playing Pitch Strategy (Sport England 2013) and Assessing Needs and Opportunities Guide for

Indoor and Outdoor Sports Facilities; Sport England 2013).

Playing Pitches for Football, Cricket, Rugby and Hockey

2.2 Figure 2.1 summarises the stages of the methodology used. This assessment report summarises

steps 1 – 6 (also referred to in the guidance as Stages A - C) while the strategy document will

include recommendations and actions (Stages D and E).

Figure 2.1: Developing and Delivering a Playing Pitch Strategy – The 10 Step Approach

Geographical Analysis

2.3 The assessment covers the area within the local authority boundaries of Hinckley and Bosworth.

2.4 To provide a further understanding of the spatial distribution of both supply and demand, as well

as to add a geographical dimension to analysis, the borough has also been divided into sub areas.

These divide the borough into the urban area of Hinckley and Burbage and the remaining area

(termed Northern Parishes for the purpose of this assessment).


2.5 While analysis in this assessment report is primarily presented at a borough wide and sub area

level, site specific detail is also provided both in the report and in the accompanying appendices

and database. This ensures that data can be analysed at any geographical level required.

2.6 PPS guidance uses the following definitions of a playing pitch and playing field. These definitions

are set out by the Government in the 2015 ‘Town and Country Planning (Development

Management Procedure) (England) Order’.1 It should be noted that the reference to five years

within the Order is purely in relation to whether Sport England should be consulted in a statutory

capacity. The fact that a playing field may not have been marked out for pitch sport in the last 5

years does not mean that it is no longer a playing field - this remains its lawful planning use

whether marked out or not;

Playing pitch – a delineated area which is used for association football, rugby, cricket,

hockey, lacrosse, rounders, baseball, softball, American football, Australian football, Gaelic

football, shinty, hurling, polo or cycle polo.

Playing field – the whole of a site which encompasses at least one playing pitch.

2.7 Although the statutory definition of a playing field is the whole of a site with at least one pitch of

0.2ha or more, this PPS takes into account smaller sized pitches that contribute to pitch stock, for

example, 5v5 mini football pitches. This PPS counts individual grass pitches (as a delineated area) as

the basic unit of supply. The definition of a playing pitch also includes artificial grass pitches (AGPs).

2.8 As far as possible the assessment report aims to capture all of the pitches within Hinckley and

Bosworth. There may however be instances where a site is omitted. Where pitches have not been

recorded within the report they remain as pitches and for planning purposes continue to be so.

Furthermore, exclusion of a pitch does not mean that it is not required from a supply and demand

point of view. The strategy document will seek to ensure that the list of sites within the Borough is

kept up to date as any omissions arise.

Steps 2 and 3 – Gather Supply and Demand Information and Views

Supply

2.9 The data collection process included a full audit of pitches across the borough. For each site, the

following information was collected;

Site name, location, ownership and management type

Number and type of pitches and outdoor sports facilities

Accessibility of pitches to the community

Overall quality of pitches and ancillary facilities (including maintenance regimes)

Level of protection and security of tenure

Views of users and providers.

Demand

2.10 To evaluate the demand for playing pitches, the following information was collated;

Number of sports clubs and teams and their match and training requirements

Casual and other demand

Educational demand

1. www.sportengland.org>Facilities and Planning> Planning Applications

http://www.sportengland.org/


Displaced demand (i.e. teams wishing to play within the borough but unable to)

Latent demand

Future demand (including club and team aspirations for development as well as National

Governing Body priorities and targets)

User views and experiences, including trends and changes in demand.

2.11 The following tasks were undertaken to compile the above supply and demand data;

Review of existing HBBC data on playing fields and open space and the Sport England Active

Places tool

Reviewing NGB data on pitches, outdoor sports facilities and local participation

Full review of local league websites, fixture lists and pitch booking records

Use of available technical quality assessment reports

Undertaking non-technical site visits

Undertaking a detailed survey and follow up consultation with secondary schools and other

schools with community use

A full programme of consultation with sports clubs and league secretaries

Face to face and telephone discussions with NGBs to discuss key issues and priorities.

2.12 A high proportion of teams in Hinckley and Bosworth successfully engaged with the process as set

out in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Club Survey Response Rate

Cricket Hockey Bowls Rugby

Union

Football Tennis Golf

75% 100% 80% 100% 90% 100% 100%

Steps 4, 5 and 6 – Assessing the Supply and Demand Information and Views

2.13 The supply and demand information collated has been used, in line with the Sport England

methodology, to;

understand the situation at individual sites;

develop the current and projected future pictures for each sport; and

identify the key findings and issues that need to be addressed.

2.14 Figure 2.2 overleaf, extracted directly from the guidance (Sport England 2013), provides further

detail of the issues explored during the analysis of the adequacy of provision.

Steps 6 - 10 Develop the Strategy and Deliver the Strategy and Keep it Up to Date and

Robust

2.15 The strategy document will use the issues identified to set out a strategic framework for the

provision of pitches. Recommendations and priorities will be developed following extensive

scenario testing and in conjunction with key stakeholders (both internal to the Council and

external).

Non Pitch Sports - Sport England (Assessing Needs and Opportunities Guide for Indoor and

Outdoor Sports Facilities; 2013)

2.16 For bowls and tennis, the assessment stages (Phase A) of the Assessing Needs and Opportunities

Guide (ANOG) approach are as follows:


Stage 1 – Prepare and tailor your assessment

Stage 2 – Gather information on supply and demand

Stage 3 – Assessment, bring the information together.

2.17 The key tasks undertaken in relation to the assessment are briefly summarised below.

Stage 1: Undertaking an Assessment:

2.18 This was carried out through detailed discussions with the steering group.

Stage 2: Gather Information on Supply and Demand

2.19 To gather information on supply, visits were made to all bowling greens and tennis courts and

assessments made of their quality, maintenance and ‘fit for purpose’ rating. Discussions were held

with operators, managers and users.

2.20 To gather information on demand, questionnaires were sent (many with follow up phone calls

and/or visits) to all known sports clubs. Consultation took place with national and regional

governing body of sport representatives.

Stage 3: Assessment – Bring the Information Together

2.21 The analysis seeks to bring together the evidence gathered to gain an understanding of the

relationship between supply and demand. Key findings and issues to be addressed are set out for

each of the sports / facilities covered.

B Application of Assessment – Strategy Development

2.22 Recommendations and strategy priorities are developed to address the issues identified through

the data collection and analysis undertaken in Step A.


Figure 2.2: Overview of the Assessment Process

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

Understand the situation at

individual sites

Develop the current

picture of provision

Develop the future picture of provision

An overview for each site available to the community should

be developed consisting of:

1. A comparison between the amount of play a site can

accommodate with how much play takes place there;

2. Whether there is any spare capacity during the peak

period for relevant pitch types;

3. The key issues with, and views of, the provision at the

site.

Identify the key findings and issues

Site overviews should be used to help understand:

1. The situation across all sites available to the community;

2. The situation across only those sites with secured

community use;

3. The nature and extent of play taking place at sites with

unsecured community use;

4. The nature and extent of any displaced, unmet and latent

demand;

5. Key issues raised with the adequacy of provision;

6. The situation at any priority sites.

The current picture of provision and the future demand

information from Stage B should be used to help understand:

1. How population change will affect the demand for

provision;

2. How participation targets and current/future trends may

affect the demand for provision;

3. Whether there are any particular sports clubs or sites

where demand is likely to increase;

4. How any forthcoming changes in supply may affect the

adequacy of provision to meet demand.

The current and future pictures of provision, along with the

site overviews, should be used to answer the following

questions:

1. What are the main characteristics of the current and future

supply of and demand for provision?

2. Is there enough accessible and secured community use

provision to meet current and future demand?

3. Is the provision that is accessible of sufficient quality and

appropriately managed?


This Assessment

2.23 The remainder of this assessment therefore provides an overview of each sport in Hinckley and

Bosworth BC and provides the evidence behind the issues presented in the strategy document.

2.24 To inform the analysis of the current and projected future picture for each sport, Section 3

summarises the strategic context, as well as demographic profile (both current and future).

3: Strategic Context


Introduction

3.1 This section briefly summarises the key policies that impact upon the preparation of this

assessment and strategy and provides an overview of the demographics of the borough and the

impact of this on demand for pitch sports and outdoor sports facilities. It provides an overview only

- sport specific issues are discussed in Sections 4 onwards.

Strategic Context

National Level

3.2 At a national level, there are several key policies that impact upon the preparation of this Playing

Pitch and outdoor sports facilities assessment.

3.3 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) clearly establishes the requirement for local

plans to ensure that there is proper provision of community and cultural facilities to meet local

needs. The NPPF’s expectations for the development of local planning policy for sport and physical

activity/recreation is set out in paragraphs 96 and 97 which require there to be a sound (i.e. up-to-

date and verifiable) evidence base underpinning policy and its application. Paragraph 96 indicates

that:

‘Access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and recreation and physical activity is

important for the health and well-being of communities. Planning policies should be based on robust

and up to date assessments of the need for open space, sports and recreation facilities (including

qualitative or quantitative deficits or surpluses) and opportunities for new provision. Information

gained from the assessments should be used to determine what open space, sports and recreational

provision is needed, which plans should then seek to accommodate.’

3.4 Paragraph 97 states that:

‘Existing open space, sports and recreational buildings and land, including playing fields, should not

be built on unless:

an assessment has been undertaken which has clearly shown the open space, buildings or land

to be surplus to requirements; or

the loss resulting from the proposed development would be replaced by equivalent or better

provision in terms of quantity and quality in a suitable location; or

the development is for alternative sports and recreational provision, the benefits of which

clearly outweigh the loss of the current or former use

3.5 The preparation of this playing pitch assessment and strategy will help to ensure that Hinckley and

Bosworth BC are able to deliver upon the requirements of this national policy.

3.6 Sport England has been a statutory consultee on planning applications affecting playing pitches

since 1996 and has a long established policy of retention, which is the precursor to the National

Planning Policy Framework guidance above. Sport England also advises that informed decisions on

playing pitch matters require all local authorities to have an up to date assessment of need and a

strategy emanating from this. Sport England recommend that a strategy is monitored and updated

annually and refreshed every three years. This assessment will support the Council in implementing

a robust strategic approach to the delivery of pitches. Sport England’s National Strategy ‘Towards

an Active Nation (“016 - 2021)’ underpins this playing pitch assessment.


3.7 Focusing specifically on sport, most of the National Governing Bodies have facility strategies

setting out the requirements for their sport as follows;

The Football Association - National Game Strategy for Participation and Development (2015

- 2019)

Cricket Unleashed –Strategic Plan (2016)

The Rugby Football Union National Facilities Strategy (2013 – 2017) (currently being

updated).

England Hockey Facilities Strategy – (2017 - 2021).

3.8 The key principles of each of these strategic documents are outlined in the appendices. These

principles will be considered both in the assessment of the adequacy of facilities and in the strategy

document, determining the future priorities for delivery of each sport.

Local Policy Context

3.9 The preparation of this Playing Pitch and Outdoor Sports Facility Strategy also impacts upon, or is

informed by, a number of key local documents. These are briefly summarised in Table 3.1.


Table 3.1: Key Strategic Documents in Hinckley and Bosworth

Document details Description of main content Key implications for Playing Pitch Strategy

Local Plan 2006 – 2026:

Core Strategy (2009),

two Area Action Plans,

and Site Allocations

and Development

Management Policies

DPD (2016)

The Core Strategy was adopted in 2009 and sets out the general vision and spatial

strategy for the delivery of the local plan 2006 - 2026. It outlines the broad

locations proposed for housing development and other strategic needs.

Development Plan Documents implement the vision contained within the core

strategy. These include site allocations and local area action plans and these

amount to the ‘Local Plan 2006-2026’.

The Local Plan 2006 - 2026 will be superseded by the new Local Plan. A

Local Plan Review is currently underway to deliver this and will set out how

the borough will grow and develop up to 2036. It will will set out the

policies to guide development and protect the environment. It will also set

aside land to meet identified needs.

This Playing Pitch Assessment will inform the Local Plan Review, providing a

robust evidence base for decision making. It will highlight where new

provision is needed and where existing provision requires enhancement

and will help to ensure that the facility stock is tailored to the changing

needs of the local population.

Hinckley and Bosworth

Corporate Plan 2017

The corporate plan sets out the Councils vision for the Borough up to 2021. It sets

out key priorities under three overarching strategic priorities;

People - helping people to stay healthy, active and protected from harm

Places - creating clean and attractive places to live and work

Prosperity - encouraging growth, attracting businesses, improving skills and

supporting regeneration.

In order to achieve each of the strategic priorities, the corporate plan sets a series

of actions that will happen. Of specific note to the preparation of the playing pitch

strategy, the document indicates that;

We will bring in initiatives to improve health through our health and

wellbeing strategy

We will continue to work with our partners to make the most of our thriving

voluntary and community sector

Our existing parks, open spaces and playgrounds will continue to meet high

quality standards.

This playing pitch strategy will contribute to the achievement of the goals

of the corporate plan, providing an evidence base outlining the current

situation and setting key actions that will support the improved delivery of

sport and recreation facilities across the borough.

Leicester and

Leicestershire Strategic

The emerging Strategic Growth Plan is being developed by a partnership

This strategy document and assessment will provide a robust evidence base

outlining the adequacy of facilities to meet existing demand and the

improvements that are required to the facility stock to meet the needs of



Growth Plan formed by Leicester City and Leicestershire County councils, the seven local

borough and district authorities including Hinckley and Bosworth and the

Leicester and Leicestershire Enterprise Partnership (LLEP). It sets out

aspirations for delivering growth in Leicestershire until 2050. The final

version of the plan will provide strategic direction and help shape the new

Local Plan for Hinckley and Bosworth.

projected future populations. It will inform the Hinckley and Bosworth

Borough Local Plan, which will inform the Leicestershire wide growth

strategy. This will ensure that , valuable sporting assets are protected and

that new facilities are provided in line with population growth where it is

highlighted that they needed.

Housing and Economic

Development Needs

Assessment 2017

The assessment considers the need for housing and employment land over the

next 20 years for the whole of Leicestershire. The findings of this document,

alongside wider evidence on land availability and infrastructure will be used to

inform the preparation of the Leicestershire Wide Strategic Growth Plan and the

new Local Plan for Hinckley and Bosworth.

This Playing Pitch Strategy may inform decision making relating to land

required for housing. Following the allocation of sites, it will also be

necessary to consider the implications that the location of future provision

will have on demand for sports facilities.

Hinckley and Bosworth

Open Space and

Recreational Study

2016

This document provides an assessment of provision of a range of green space

types across the borough. It updates the initial PPG17 study that was completed in

2010. The 2010 study included a review of outdoor sports facilities in the borough.

This Playing Pitch Strategy will update the outdoor sports facilities

assessment of the 2010 PPG17 assessment and complement the findings of

the Open Space and Recreational Study 2016.

While the Open Space and Recreational Study 2017 considers the role of

open spaces in general terms, the Playing Pitch Strategy will consider the

specific needs for football, rugby, hockey, cricket, tennis, golf and bowls

and follows a detailed methodology set by Sport England. It sets out site

specific priorities and actions which should be read in conjunction with the

recommendations in the open space assessment.

Leicestershire and

Rutland Strategy for

Sport and Physical

Activity 2017 - 2021

The strategy presents a long term vision for sport and physical activity in the region

and indicates that across the partnership, there is a shared commitment to enrich

the lives of the residents of LLR by:

Getting more people to take part in physical activity and sport

Improving physical and mental well being

Developing the paid and unpaid workforce

Creating a strong voice for physical activity and sport

Building a physical activity and sport environment that is safe, fair and

customer focused.

The strategy sets the following ambitions:

This playing pitch assessment will contribute to the achievement of the

aims and objectives of this strategy document.



Get Active - ensure that everyone has the opportunity to start participating

in physical activity and sport

Stay Active - support people to develop a resilient physical activity and sport

habit to ensure lifelong sport participation

Active Places - create facilities, playing pitches and informal spaces that

encourage physical activity, are high quality and accessible

Active economy - promote the area as a premier, high performing location

for undertaking the business of physical activity and sport.

Leicester and

Leicestershire

Enterprise Partnership

Sector Growth Plan –

Sports & Physical

Activity

The plan sets out the strategic priorities for the sport and physical activity growth

plan, specifically;

1. Business Theme

a. Provide Sport & Physical Activity sector businesses with access to

support to increase their competitiveness both domestically and in

international markets

b. Support Sport & Physical Activity sector businesses to maximise

innovation in new products, services and processes to increase

productivity.

c. Maximising the impact of increased participation and healthier lifestyles

on the Sport & Physical Activity sector business base.

2. People Theme

a. Develop the skills base to meet the current and future needs of the

sector.

b. Attract and retain young people into the sector.

3. Place Theme

a. Promote Leicester & Leicestershire as a premier location to attract sport

& physical activity business investment and tourism

b. Develop a coherent plan to attract and develop sport events of national

This playing pitch assessment will contribute to the achievement of the

aims and objectives of this strategy document.



and international standing

c. Develop sport & physical activity infrastructure to support sector growth

and meet increasing demand.


3.10 Analysis of the key strategic drivers set out in Table 3.1 therefore identifies a consistent theme

around increasing participation and ensuring that a network of facilities is provided that can do

this, both now and in future years as the population grows and its composition changes.

3.11 The challenge of achieving much needed investment, whilst at the same time making considerable

savings is however significant. An effective network of outdoor sports facilities can be central to the

achievement of health improvement and participation related goals and will be key to delivering

the desired outcomes of other strategies. This will however need to be delivered within an arena of

budget cuts and reducing maintenance programmes.

Demographic and Participation Profile

3.12 An understanding of the character of an area, population trends and overall participation in sport

underpins the evaluation of the adequacy of outdoor sports facilities in later sections. It provides an

important context for the provision of outdoor sports facilities and can significantly influence the

amount and type of demand for sporting activities, as well as the challenges associated with

providing an adequate supply.

Demographic Context

3.13 The demographic context is central to determining current and future need for outdoor sports

facilities.

3.14 The total population of Hinckley and Bosworth according to the Census 2011 was 105,100. On

average the population of those under 15 is lower (16%) than average (England 19%), while the

population of those that are over 64 is higher (20%) than average (England 16%).

3.15 Given that younger age ranges most traditionally participate in outdoor sport, and the amount

falling into this group is below average, this is a less positive indicator in terms of potential sport

and physical activity participation. This may impact upon the overall levels of demand for outdoor

sports facilities.

Projected Population Growth

3.16 Analysis of projected changes to the population profile forms a key component of facility

requirements for outdoor sports facilities and is essential to ensure that there are sufficient facilities

to meet future need.

3.17 Population projections (2014-based Subnational Population Projections released in May 2016 - the

most up to date source available) reveal that the number of people living in Hinckley and Bosworth

had risen to 109,898 by 2017. Figures suggest that the population will further increase by a further

8.9% by 2036 (from 109898 to 122875). This represents a relatively significant level of growth, which

may impact upon demand for sports facilities in the borough.

3.18 Critically for the provision of sports facilities, it is the proportion of the population in older age

groups that is increasing. This is evident in Table 3.2 which indicates that the number of people in

older age groups is rising and the proportion of people in younger age groups is declining. Given

that it is the younger age groups that are more active in pitch sports, for the majority of sports

considered in this document, changes to the population profile are therefore likely to mean that

demand for facilities will not increase in line with population growth.

3.19 That said, there will still be an increase of 3769 people aged up to 45 in Hinckley and Bosworth

Borough up to 2036 and this will impact upon demand facilities. The actual increase in people of

age groups most likely to play pitch sports is however proportionally smaller than the increase in

the general population


Table 3.2: Projected increases in Population

Total

Number of

People in

Age Group

Proportion of

Total

Population

Total

Number of

People in

Age Group

Proportion of

Total

Population

Age Range 2017 2036

0 - 15 19243 18% 20789 17%

16-44 35476 32% 37699 31%

45 -64 31303 28% 29700 24%

65+ 23876 22% 34688 28%

Total 109898

122876

Potential Housing Growth

3.20 The Council is reviewing its Local Plan, including site allocations and Development Management

Policies. The new Local Plan will partly respond to the Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth

Plan and provide detail on where and how much new development will take place in the Borough.

The Housing and Economic Development Needs Assessment (HEDNA) 2017 identifies an

Objectively Assessed Housing Need (OAN) of 454 dwellings per annum to 2036 for Hinckley and

Bosworth. The new Local Plan will identify how much development land is needed to meet the

growth and regeneration needs of the Borough and identify the most sustainable sites to

accommodate this. While an initial housing requirement has been identified for Hinckley and

Bosworth, it is yet to be determined how this will be delivered and this requirement may increase

(particularly if Hinckley and Bosworth are required to accommodate demand from other areas of

Leicestershire).

3.21 The current Local Plan (via the Core Strategy) indicates that the majority of housing growth in the

Borough will be focused around Hinckley urban area, along with two sustainable urban extensions

at Earl Shilton and Barwell. Elsewhere within the Borough, the current Local Plan reflects modest

housing growth.

3.22 The location of development (delivered through the current Local Plan and any future Local Plan

Review) may impact upon demand for sports facilities and this will be considered where

appropriate in the strategy document as well as in sections that follow.

Sports Participation Profile

3.23 A review of Hinckley and Bosworth’s sporting and health profile concludes that;

Hinckley and Bosworth demonstrate fluctuating participation since the Active People Survey

started in 2005/6. Over this period, participation levels (16+) (as measured through the

Active People Survey) demonstrate that around 37% of the population take part in 1 x 30

mins of sport and physical activity each week (although this has declined and risen again in

recent years) This level is above the national and East Midlands trends (and is particularly

positive given the slight ageing population of the borough)

While participation has remained relatively static, the number of residents who indicated that

they were members of clubs declined slightly in recent years, with levels of membership now

reaching figures below East Midlands and England averages


The 2017 Public Health Profile for Hinckley and Bosworth indicates that the health of people

is generally better than the England average and life expectancy is higher. This links with the

positive participation statistics, but there remain significant opportunities for further

increasing the number of residents participating in sport and physical activity. It reveals that

life expectancy is 5.4 years lower for men and 4.1 years lower for women in the most

deprived areas of Hinckley and Bosworth than in the least deprived areas. Levels of obesity in

Hinckley and Bosworth are also higher than national and regional averages. Engagement

with sport and physical activity can make significant inroads into addressing these problems

None of the sports featured in this playing pitch and outdoor sports facility assessment are

amongst the top sports (in terms of participation numbers in the Borough). Sport England

Market Segmentation however reveals that the dominant segments include Philip and Tim,

both of whom are high participants in pitch and active sports. The other three segments in

the top five dominant segments are however Elsie and Arnold, Roger and Joy and Elaine. All

of these are older age groups with lower propensities to participate in pitch sports (although

bowling is often enjoyed by residents in these groups). This suggests that there is a spread in

the profile of residents of the borough and that a variety of sporting opportunities will be

required in order to ensure that there are activities for all.

Summary

Context - Summary and Key issues

The key issues arising from analysis of the context and issues for this playing pitch assessment in

Hinckley and Bosworth are therefore;

the preparation of the assessment will contribute directly to the national and local policy

agenda, providing foundations for the review of the Hinckley and Bosworth Local Plan as

well as decision making in relation to planning applications

This assessment and strategy document will also inform local priorities - existing strategic

documents identify a consistent theme around increasing participation and ensuring that a

network of facilities is provided that can do this, both now and in future years as the

population grows and its composition changes. The challenge of achieving much needed

investment, whilst at the same time making considerable savings is however significant

An effective network of outdoor sports facilities can be central to the achievement of health

improvement and participation related goals and will be key to delivering the desired

outcomes of other strategies. This strategy will provide the foundations for delivering such a

network and therefore support the achievement of the key goals of many local, regional and

national strategic documents

Demographically, the profile of the borough has a lower propensity to participate in

outdoor sports, with slightly lower proportions of people in age groups that more

traditionally participate. This will be exacerbated further according to population

projections, which suggest that the proportion of people falling within the more active age

groups will actually decline (although the total number of residents falling within these age

groups will increase, providing a knock-on requirement for a greater number of facilities)

The health profile of the borough is mixed, with issues of poor health in areas of deprivation

and levels of obesity above national and regional averages. There is therefore significant

scope to use sport and physical activity as a vehicle to improve health


Levels of activity are relatively static in the borough although club membership has declined.

Market segmentation demonstrates a split in the interests of the population, with the five

dominant segments including Tim, Philip (both active and interested in pitch sports) and

Elsie and Arnold, Joy and Roger and Elaine (all less active and more likely to take part in

recreational activities). A variety of different sporting opportunities across the borough will

be essential if opportunities are to be provided for all sectors of the population.

4: Cricket


Introduction

4.1 This section evaluates the adequacy of pitches for cricket and provides:

An overview of the supply and demand for cricket pitches

An understanding of activity at individual sites in the borough;

A picture of the adequacy of current provision; and

The future picture of provision for cricket.

Pitch Supply

4.2 There are 17 sites containing grass facilities for cricket in Hinckley and Bosworth, providing a total

of 17 pitches. There are no sites containing two or more cricket pitches.

4.3 This figure includes all known public, private, school and other pitches whether or not they offer

community use. Pitches available are summarised in Table 4.1, along with the level of community

use that is offered. Further detail is provided in the Appendix.

Table 4.1: Grass Cricket Pitches across Hinckley and Bosworth

Area

Site Name

Number

of Grass

Pitches

Non-Turf

Pitches Ownership /

Management

Level of

Community Use

Northern

Parishes

Alans

way/Newbold

Vernon CC

1 0

Town Council / Club

Secure community

use

Barwell Sports

and Social Club

1 0 Trustees of sports club.

Maintained by Club

Secure community

use

Keats Lane /Earl

Shilton CC

1 1 Owned and managed

by club

Secure community

use

Higham on the

Hill

1 0 Owned by Church,

managed by club.

Some concerns over

security of tenure

Secure community

use

Jubilee Playing

Fields / Altar

Playing Fields

Markfield

1 0

Markfield Parish

Council

Secure community

use

Market

Bosworth Sports

Club/Bosworth

CC

1 0

Owned and managed

by club

Secure community

use

Ratby Sports

Club

1 0 Owned and managed

by club

Secure community

use

Stapleton

Village CC

1 0 Commercial, managed

by Parish Council

Secure community

use


Area

Site Name

Number

of Grass

Pitches

Non-Turf

Pitches Ownership /

Management

Level of

Community Use

Stoke Golding

Recreation

Ground

1 0 Stoke Golding Parish

Council. Managed by

Parish and Cricket Club

Secure community

use

Twycross CC 1 0 Parish Council,

managed by Club

Secure community

use

Hinckley

Academy

1 0

School

No access to grass

pitches. Access to

AGP only

Dixie Grammar

School

1 0

School

No access to grass

pitches. Access to

AGP only

Brookvale

Learning

Campus 0

1

School

Secure community

use

Redmoor

Academy

0

1

School

Unsecure

community use -

ad hoc

agreements with

specific clubs

South

Charnwood

High School 0

4

School

Unsecure

community use -

ad hoc

agreements with

specific clubs

St Martins

Catholic

Academy

0

1

School

Unsecure

community use -

ad hoc

agreements with

specific clubs

Urban Ashby

Road/Hinckley

Amateurs CC

1 0

Site now owned and

managed by Club

Secure community

use

Urban

Hinckley Road

Recreation

Ground

1 0 Managed by Burbage

TC. Parish and Club

maintain facility

Secure community

use

Langdale Park 1 0 Owned and managed

by HBBC

Secure community

use

Hinckley Sports

and

Social/Hinckley

Town CC

1 0

Owned and

maintained by club

Secure community

use

Swallows Green 1 0 HBBC, leased and

managed by club

Secure community

use

Total 17

8


4.4 Table 4.1 reveals that;

the only grass pitches not available for community use are the two pitches at school sites -

Hinckley Academy and Dixie Grammar. The remainder are all secured although there are

some concerns over long term security of tenure at Higham on the Hill CC;

public ownership of cricket pitches is comparatively high, with large quantities of pitches in

park / recreation area settings. There is one facility managed by the Borough Council,

provided at Langdale Park. The majority of pitches are managed by clubs themselves (either

alone or in partnership with Parish Councils). This means that on the whole, despite the high

levels of public ownership, clubs have a strong influence in the quality of the cricket pitches

that are provided; and

the majority of non-turf wickets are available at school sites. There is some unsecured access

to these facilities although there is little promotion evident of their availability.

4.5 Spatially, pitches are spread across the borough and are primarily located in the northern parishes.

25% of pitches are located within the urban area.

4.6 In addition to the pitches outlined in Table 4.1 above, there are several other sites known to have

previously contained cricket pitches but to no longer do so. These include Barlestone Recreation

Ground, Clarendon Park, Old Colliery Ground and Richmond Park. At all of these sites, cricket is

believed to be no longer provided due to a perceived lack of demand.

Pitch Quality

4.7 The quality of cricket pitches is a key component of pitch provision. It is so important that the

Leicestershire and Rutland Cricket League require umpires to rate the pitches after each match,

ensuring that they are fit for purpose and that any issues with the overall pitch quality, the wicket,

or the outfield are identified. If pitches and associated ancillary provision are not up to the required

quality standards, this can lead to relegation from the league and / or loss of promotion. Many

clubs can reach a stage where they are unable to progress further due to the quality of their

facilities, rather than their playing capabilities.

4.8 To evaluate the suitability of pitches for cricket, the quality of pitches was therefore assessed

through a variety of sources, including;

site visits undertaken using the non-technical assessment that accompanies the Playing Pitch

Strategy Guidance note and prepared by the ECB;

analysis of local league pitch ratings; and

consultation.

4.9 The broad issues identified across Hinckley and Bosworth as a whole through each of these means

are set out below. Site specific issues identified are summarised in Table 4.2.

Non-Technical Site Visits

4.10 Non-technical assessments provide a basic overview of the facilities available and the quality of

facilities on the site. They provide a view at a point in time, but to provide a full picture of quality,

the findings need to be triangulated with other sources of evidence.


4.11 Assessments indicate that the overall quality of pitches that are accessible to the community in

Hinckley and Bosworth is mixed, specifically;

the majority of sites for cricket in Hinckley and Bosworth are fit for purpose, although there is

a range in the scale and scope of facilities provided. While many sites offer only basic

facilities (grass pitch / small pavilion) others offer a wider range of facilities with training

equipment and larger pavilions. Pitches overall are rated standard to good. The lack of

facilities (training facilities in particular) as well as issues with outfield / wicket quality are the

key reasons for sites achieving lower scores;

there is scope to improve the maintenance procedures applied to many sites and this is one

of the key issues arising. Several sites demonstrate evidence of weed infestation in both the

outfields and the squares;

almost all outfields are uneven. Some of the grass squares are also uneven in parts, which

can impact upon the quality of the game;

there is a lack of outdoor training facilities, with very few sites containing training nets and /

or non-turf wickets. Training facilities are important in promoting junior development, as well

as in ensuring that teams are able to practice without impacting on the match squares. This

is of particular significance as cricket clubs grow, as without off field practice facilities, there

is a conflict between training requires and junior / development activity. Where training

facilities are provided, they are not always high quality and some are in need of repair;

many sites suffer from recreational use, which can offer a conflict of interest, and impact

upon the quality of the square and outfield. The dual use of sites for cricket with football is

also evident, with some outfields demonstrating heavy wear and tear as a result of this.

4.12 All of the above issues impact upon the functionality of the existing pitches and their suitability for

the purpose that they are intended. It should be noted that there are no geographical patterns

relating to the quality of pitches - the only patterns evident are by provider.

4.13 Chart 4.1 reflects the points raised above, and summarises the scores achieved in the site visits. It

demonstrates that the quality (and availability) of the training facilities is a particular concern for

cricket in Hinckley and Bosworth.

Chart 4.1 - Average Quality Scores achieved in site visits

Local League Pitch Rating and Consultations


4.14 The Leicestershire and Rutland Cricket League work to ensure that cricket is played on pitches of

appropriate quality, both for player safety and enjoyment. Improvement of the standard of cricket

grounds across Leicestershire was one of the key drivers of the formation of the new league (2013).

4.15 All clubs must affiliate to the Leicestershire and Rutland Cricket League which includes membership

of the L&RACG. For the clubs this includes access to experienced pitch advisors, assistance in

obtaining formal IOG Qualifications and opportunities to benefit from second hand equipment

sales, equipment hire and discounts through a bulk purchasing scheme amongst other benefits.

4.16 Reflecting the focus on quality, the league implements a detailed pitch quality review. After each

match, pitches are scored in terms of the quality of the outfield, quality of the wicket and condition

of the facilities overall. Sites achieving scores of below 3 are considered to have poor or

unacceptable facilities. Reflecting the standards of play in the league and to ensure that facilities do

not become a barrier to participation, there are different criteria according as follows;

Teams playing in the premiership - A minimum of Grade B Ground

Divisions 1, 2 and 3 - Grade B Ground

Divisions 4, 5 and 6 - Grade C Ground

Divisions 7,8 and 9 - Grade D Ground

Divisions 10 - 11 ungraded.

4.17 The league has a dedicated facility manager who works with clubs to improve the condition of

grounds and to support clubs where issues are identified.

4.18 The issue of facility quality is regularly raised at meetings of the League Executive Committee,

evidenced by a review of the monthly minutes of meetings. At the August 2017 meeting, it was

noted that several clubs will again be impacted by the poor condition of their facilities, with some

clubs that have good playing strength but poor facilities unable to improve the division that they

are playing in. This impacts the progression of clubs and player experience. Specific to Hinckley and

Bosworth, Stoke Golding CC were in the running for promotion from Division 4w but were unable

to move up due to limitations with their facilities. There are also concerns that some clubs are

seeking to improve but are limited by their grounds, while others do not wish to carry out the

required work but are based at grounds that offer significant potential.

4.19 The regular assessments undertaken by the league enables more detailed evaluation of the pitch

quality in Hinckley and Bosworth and a comparison of facilities compared to pitches in other parts

of Leicestershire. The key findings are set out in Chart 4.2. It reveals that for each of the three

criteria (pitch / outfield / facilities), sites in Hinckley and Bosworth achieve a rating slightly below

the league average.


Chart 4.2: Average Site Quality Ratings (Leicestershire and Rutland League 2017)

4.20 Table 4.2 breaks down the league ratings further, highlighting in red any sites achieving below the

average score for the league as a whole. It indicates that Earl Shilton CC and, Ratby Town CC

achieve scores of below average for all three criteria.

4.21 Average calculations exclude pitches with clubs in the premier league as the steering group felt

that inclusion of these sites would unfairly skew average figures. It should also be noted that this

analysis provides a comparison only, as in reality grounds will be graded against their ground

grading requirements (ie B grade grounds will be compared against more strict criteria than C

grade grounds).

Table 4.2: Ratings achieved by sites in Hinckley and Bosworth (Leicestershire and Rutland

League)

Ground Name Pitch Mark Outfield Mark Facilities Mark

Stoke Golding 6.75 6.31 6.8

Newtown Linford 6.91 6.45 8.05

Twycross 6.91 7 5.93

Hinckley Amateur 3 7.95 7.45 6.53

Hinckley Amateur 7.01 7.02 6.91

Earl Shilton 5.86 6.57 6.3

Newbold Verdon 6.27 6.31 7.64

Higham Village 6.6 7.21 6.57

Hinckley Town 7.14 7.36 7.19

Stapleton 5.9 6.78 6.5

Newbold Verdon 2 6.67 6.85 6.91

Barwell 6.95 7.55 7.06

Ratby Town 6.33 5.64 5.89

Newtown Linford 3 5.94 6.83 7.3

Burbage 6.39 5.95 7.15


Ground Name Pitch Mark Outfield Mark Facilities Mark

Market Bosworth 5.98 6.04 8.13

Asian Sports 3rd XI 5.76 6.07 6.57

Last Man Stands

4.22 There are no Last Man Stands leagues based within Hinckley and Bosworth and therefore no known

facility requirements. The nearest Last Man Stands League is hosted in Leicester City at Evington

Park.

4.23 There are no known plans to establish a Last Man Stands franchise in the area and no clear

evidence of demand.

Club Consultation

4.24 Consultation was carried out with all clubs playing league cricket within Hinckley and Bosworth.

Again, quality emerged as a key concern. Site specific issues are recorded in Table 4.2, but the key

issues emerging with regards quality were;

A greater number of clubs indicate that pitches have improved in quality than consider there

to have been deterioration. Most improvement is attributed to specific, targeted investment

by the provider while deterioration is considered to have arisen due to issues with

maintenance. The overall trends are illustrated in Chart 4.3

Opinions are mixed with regards the overall quality of facilities, but reflecting the findings of

site visits, vary between standard and good

the key concern raised relating to quality is the condition of the outfield (a particular concern

for those club sharing with football clubs) and this reflects the findings of site visits. Several

clubs also raise concerns about the condition of their pavilion and the lack of training

facilities that are on offer

The maintenance of facilities also arises as a key issue, with several clubs highlighting the

prohibitive costs of effective maintenance regimes and concerns about the maintenance

regimes that are currently being applied. Many clubs have ageing / inappropriate machinery

which impacts upon the success of any maintenance regime. While most clubs maintaining

their own grounds felt able to do so, two felt that they did not have appropriate knowledge

and more referenced the reliance upon one or two club members for effective maintenance

procedures (and therefore raising concerns about appropriate succession planning. Lack of

funding was perceived to be a key barrier to pitch and facility improvement

75% of responding clubs are satisfied with the quality of the existing facility stock as

demonstrated in Figure 4.3. Those that are not attribute this to concerns about pitch and

clubhouse quality. Other concerns that are raised by clubs include the lack of funding and

the challenges that dwindling participation presents to clubs.

Chart 4.3: Perceived Trends in Pitch Quality


Chart 4.4: Satisfaction with Facility Stock

Site Specific Issues

4.25 Building upon the general findings, Table 4.3 summarises site specific quality issues identified.

Areas of concern are highlighted in red. The information included is based upon the triangulation

of evidence from clubs, provider, non-technical site visits and local league feedback.

4.26 Table 4.3 also indicates that the highest standard of team playing at each site and the subsequent

ground grading level required. While many grounds currently accommodate teams in the middle of

their grading system, there are several teams that would need to increase their ground grade to

support a promotion (and facilities may therefore hold them back from progressing). These clubs

are;

Earl Shilton

Burbage


Stoke Golding

Hinckley Town CC

Twycross CC

4.27 The clubs using Swallows Green as overspill are also at the top end of their ground grading

requirements meaning that the facilities may become unsuitable in the event of promotion unless

further work was undertaken.

4.28 The Cricket Board highlight the importance of all components of pitch quality, prioritising pitch

maintenance, pitch quality and the provision of appropriate pavilions. Cricket Board research

indicates that the components of sustainability are social / economic and environmental and that

all elements are central to building a successful cricket club.


Table 4.3: Quality of Cricket Facilities available for community use across Hinckley and Bosworth

Sit

e N

am

e

Clu

b

Hig

hest

Sta

nd

ard

clu

b o

n s

ite

Pit

ch

Co

nd

itio

n

(Wic

kets

an

d

Ou

tfie

ld)

Pavil

ion

No

n-T

urf

Wic

ket

Nets

Main

ten

an

ce

Alans

way/Newbold

Vernon CC

Newbold Verdon CC Division 2 - Grade B

Ground

Some weeds in

outfield and scuffing

on wicket.

New lottery funded

pavilion. Good

condition

None provided Mobile net cage

Barwell Sports and

social club

Barwell CC Division 3 - - Grade

B Ground

Some moss and

thatching on the

outfield. Square

cracking on older

wickets.

None provided In need of update.

One is worn and one

is patched.

Keats Lane /Earl

Shilton CC

Earl Shilton CC Division 1 - - Grade

B Ground (but

promotion would

require increase to

Grade A)

Good condition but

outfield is uneven in

parts. Inadequate

fencing has caused

people to trample

the outfield and club

have experienced

vandalism.

Two storey pavilion

and bar

Non-turf wicket

provided

Mobile nets are in

need of attention to

improve.

Inexperienced

grounds team

Higham on the Hill

Highham Village CC Division 8 - - Grade

D Ground

Outfield undulating

and has broadleaved

weeds.

Pavilion basic but

adequate. Club use

local pub for

refreshments etc due

to limited facilities.

None provided Mobile nets Land is owned by

church - security of

tenure unknown.

Ashby

Road/Hinckley

Amateurs CC

Hinckley Amateurs

CC

Division 3 - - Grade

B Ground

Dry weather caused

cracking on square

and wickets. Pitch

slightly sloping and

uneven.

Large pavilion

catering for

functions and shared

with other sports.

None provided 2 artificial nets in

good condition

Professional

groundsman. Club

well supported

Hinckley Road

Recreation Ground

Burbage CC Division 4 - Grade C

Ground (But

promotion would

require increase to

Grade B)

Site used for

informal recreation.

Outfield uneven,

some evidence of

repair on wickets.

Basic None provided None provided

currently. Some nets

to be relocated from

site to support club.

Hinckley Sports and

Social/Hinckley

Town CC

Hinckley Town CC /

City Cricket Academy

Division 1 - - Grade

B Ground (but

promotion would

Outfield has a few

weeds but is well

prepared. Even but

Two storey pavilion

shared with clubs

from other sports.

None provided Mobile net in good

condition

Club equipped to

maintain own

facilities


Sit

e N

am

e

Clu

b

Hig

hest

Sta

nd

ard

clu

b o

n s

ite

Pit

ch

Co

nd

itio

n

(Wic

kets

an

d

Ou

tfie

ld)

Pavil

ion

No

n-T

urf

Wic

ket

Nets

Main

ten

an

ce

require increase to

Grade A)

issues with foxes and

rabbits.

Further work

required including

plumbing, some

recent renovations

have taken place.

Jubilee Playing

Fields / Altar

Playing Fields

Markfield

Newtown Linford CC

/ Asian Sports CC

Division 9 - Grade D

Ground

Square uneven and

likely to impact on

flight of ball.

Basic but requires

TLC.

None provided None provided

Langdale Park

No club. Functioned

as overspill only in

2017

N/a Square is uneven

and has poor ball

flight. Evidence of

misuse (doughnuts).

Shared with football,

very basic.

None provided None provided Issues with

maintenance and /

or informal use -

doughnuts evident

on square.

Market Bosworth

Sports

Club/Bosworth CC

Market Bosworth CC Division 6 - Grade C

Ground

Weeds and funghi

on outfield,

vertidraining has

taken place but field

is poor. Requires

reseeding and club

believe that they

need help.

New pavilion this

season, shared with

other sports and

community activities.

None provided None provided Club require support

with maintenance.

They have a strong

pavilion but issues

with outfield and

wicket and are ill

equipped to deal

with these issues.

They also lack in

appropriate

machinery.

Ratby Sports Club

Ratby CC Division 3 - Grade B

Ground

Damage to square

and square was

uneven which may

impact ball flight.

Outfield also uneven

with some weeds.

Large sports building

and separate cricket

pavilion with balcony

and scorebox.

Unfinished and club

indicate that support

is urgently required.

None provided. Club

priority.

1 mobile net. Club

priority to provide

fixed nets.

No issues identified.

Stapleton Village

CC

Stapleton CC Division 9 - Grade D

Ground

Tidy site but

molehills

encroaching towards

pitch near pavilion.

Small timber pavilion

requires updating

None provided None provided


Sit

e N

am

e

Clu

b

Hig

hest

Sta

nd

ard

clu

b o

n s

ite

Pit

ch

Co

nd

itio

n

(Wic

kets

an

d

Ou

tfie

ld)

Pavil

ion

No

n-T

urf

Wic

ket

Nets

Main

ten

an

ce

Stoke Golding

Recreation Ground

Stoke Golding CC Division 4 - - Grade

C Ground (but

promotion would

require increase to

Grade B)

Some bare patches

on wicket, with

sloping outfield and

trip hazard from

football lines. Issues

with cutting of

outfield (done by

Parish). Club also

concerned by

overlap with football.

Medium sized basic

pavilion

None provided None provided Some maintenance

issues relating to

frequency of outfield

cut. Club able to

support maintenance

of wicket.

Swallows Green

Hinckley Amateur CC

/ Nuneaton Nomads

Division 7 - Grade D

Ground (but

promotion would

require increase to

Grade C)

Weeds and fairy ring

evident on outfield.

Pavilion is shabby. None provided but

function as overspill

reduces requirement.

None provided but

function as overspill

reduces requirement.

Lease has lapsed and

is due for renewal.

Twycross CC

Twycross CC Division 4 - Grade C

Ground (but

promotion would

require increase to

Grade B)

No issues identified. Brick / metal

pavilion, very basic.

None provided. Club has mobile

practice nets and

also has a

homemade artificial

practice net.


4.29 Bringing together both the findings of the site specific information presented in Table 4.3, as well as

the key issues arising through consultation and triangulation of data, it is therefore clear that based

upon the above components of pitch provision;

There are many quality concerns, with issues relating to the condition of the outfield in

particular evident on almost all pitches in the borough (to a greater or lesser degree). Pitch

improvements and enhanced maintenance procedures (as well as the use of appropriate

equipment) represent the key priority for most of the clubs;

the availability of outdoor facilities for training is poor. Training facilities at more than half of

the sites are either limited in function or none existent. There is a lack of facilities at Barwell

Sports Club, Burbage CC, Market Bosworth Sports Club, Stapleton Village CC, Stoke Golding

CC and several more facilities have only small mobile nets of limited quality. The amount of

field training facilities provided is very poor; and

improvements are required to ancillary facilities at Higham on the Hill, Hinckley Sports and

Social Club, Burbage CC, Ratby CC, Stapleton CC and Tywcross CC either as a result of

provision being very basic and / or quality issues identified with the current arrangements.

4.30 As may be expected, the sites that are higher quality are those that are serving teams playing in the

higher echelons of the Leicestershire and Rutland Cricket League.

Security of Tenure

4.31 Many sites in the borough are owned and managed by clubs, or larger sports Trusts of which the

cricket club is a part. As is common across Leicestershire, Parish Councils are also key providers of

cricket pitches, with Markfield PC, Burbage TC, Newbold Verdon PC all maintaining cricket pitches in

conjunction with clubs.

4.32 On the whole, facilities are managed and maintained by clubs, although some issues are raised by

clubs with regards the frequency of maintenance and it is clear that this issue arises particularly in

relation to Parish Councils. This means that while some clubs have security of tenure, several are

only renting from Parishes, meaning that opportunities for funding are more limited and there are

greater concerns about the longevity of provision.

4.33 Higham on the Hill CC is on land owned by the church. The club raise concerns about the security

of tenure of this facility.

4.34 The lease has also lapsed at Swallows Green and is due for renewal.

Demand

4.35 There are 31 adult male teams currently based in Hinckley and Bosworth. The majority of these play

in the Leicestershire and Rutland Cricket League (which serves the whole of Leicestershire) and

offers formal cricket on a Saturday afternoon. The remainder play in Sunday leagues and a small

number play T20 cricket in midweek leagues.

4.36 Junior cricket is relatively poorly developed, with 17 teams. Junior activity is focused at Ratby CC,

Hinckley Amateur CC, Barwell CC, Earl Shilton Town CC and Newbold Verdon CC meaning that there

are few pathways from junior to senior cricket in the more rural parts of the borough. This means

that 65% of all participation in cricket is by senior teams which is a high proportion.

4.37 Reflecting this, while smaller more rural teams indicate that their players primarily travel below 5

miles, players at clubs with junior sections in Hinckley and Bosworth are more likely to travel

greater distances to reach their cricket club.


4.38 It is also notable that there is no female cricket taking place in the borough, and no dedicated girls

or ladies teams.

4.39 In addition to the teams based within the borough, there are several teams travelling into Hinckley

and Bosworth to play cricket. These include;

Asian Sports CC 3rd

X1 and Newtown Linford CC 3rd

X1 - both travelling to Markfield to use

Jubilee Playing Fields;

Nuneaton Nomads - travelling to Swallows Green; and

Atherstone CC 3rd

X - playing at Market Bosworth CC.

4.40 This is caused by unmet demand in neighbouring areas.

4.41 There is also a small amount of displacement within the borough, with teams from Newbold

Verdon CC and Hinckley Amateur CC forced to travel to use overspill facilities due to insufficient

pitch availability at their home grounds.

4.42 Table 4.4 summarises the cricket teams playing in Hinckley and Bosworth.

Table 4.4: Cricket Teams in Hinckley and Bosworth

Club Name Sites Used Adult

Teams

Junior

Teams

Club Participation Trends Standard of

Play (Top

Team)

Market

Bosworth

CC

Market

Bosworth CC

1 0 Static participation Division 6

Stoke

Golding CC

Stoke

Golding

Recreation

Ground

2 0 Static participation Division 4

Ratby CC

Ratby CC 2 3 Static senior, declining junior

participation with the

withdrawal of 2 teams

Division 3

Hinckley

Amateur CC

Hinckley

Amateur CC

/ Swallows

Green

5 4 Decrease in both senior and

junior play. Teams lost in both

sections

Division 3

Barwell CC

Barwell CC 2 3 Static senior, declining junior

participation with the

withdrawal of 2 teams

Division 3

Earl Shilton

Town CC

Earl Shilton 3 2 Static senior, declining junior

participation

Division 1

Hinckley

Town CC

Hinckley

Town CC

3 2 (includes

City Cricket

Academy

who are

based at

Hinckley

Town CC)

Static senior, declining junior

participation

Division 1

Higham Higham 1 Static adult participation Division 8


Club Name Sites Used Adult

Teams

Junior

Teams

Club Participation Trends Standard of

Play (Top

Team)

Village CC Village CC

Newbold

Verdon CC

Alans Way,

Newbold

Verdon

4 4 Division 4

Stapleton

CC

Stapleton CC 1 Static adult participation Division 9

Twycross CC Twycross CC 4 0 Division 4

Burbage CC Burbage CC 2 Static adult participation Division 4

4.43 It should be noted that the above participation is based upon the 2017 season. It is now known

that Bombay United will be using the facilities at Langdale Park from the 2018 season.

Trends in Participation

4.44 As evidenced in Table 4.4, participation in cricket in Hinckley and Bosworth appears to be

dwindling, with no responding clubs reporting an increase and several indicating that there has

been a decline. Decline is evident in both junior and senior cricket.

4.45 Clubs that have experienced decline attribute this to the lack of interest of local young players and

a shortage of coaching staff as well as a lack of funding. One club highlights that their biggest

challenge is the promotion of junior cricket and the attraction of young players.

4.46 Feedback from the Leicestershire County Cricket Club demonstrates that in reality, adult cricket is

fluctuating across the county and it is anticipated that there will be a slight increase again in 2018.

In contrast, junior participation continues to struggle and a decrease in the number of players has

been seen. It is hoped that new initiatives focusing upon the recruitment of players at young ages

will have a positive impact on the number of junior cricket teams in years to come.

Training Needs

4.47 Clubs primarily use indoor training nets during the winter months, with Bosworth Academy, William

Bradford Academy and Hastings College having indoor cricket nets available for hire.

4.48 In the summer months, all clubs train on their existing sites although several are forced to use the

grass square, with no off-field training facilities and no non-turf wickets available.

4.49 Leicestershire County Cricket Club highlight the importance of clubs having access to appropriate

training facilities – this is particularly important for clubs trying to develop junior sections, as

juniors tend to gravitate towards high quality training facilities and a developmental environment.

A lack of off field training facilities can also restrict the amount of development activities that can

take place, as youth training / implementation of All Stars programmes etc starts to conflict with

space required for training.

Casual Demand

4.50 Langdale Park, managed and maintained by Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council is the only

facility in the borough available for casual bookings. This pitch was booked three times during the

2017 season, twice by a team from Coventry and once by a local business team. It is known


however that for the 2018 season, this site will be used formally within the Leicestershire and

Rutland Cricket League.

4.51 There is limited other evidence of casual demand for cricket in the Borough at the current time.

Educational Demand

4.52 Demand for formal cricket pitches is much less evident from the education sector than other sports

and this is also echoed by the lack of cricket facilities that are located at school sites. Indoor cricket

at secondary schools is however increasing.

4.53 Cricket in schools is however strong and the Leicestershire County Cricket Club offer both indoor

and outdoor programmes for primary schools. Circa eight schools within Hinckley and Bosworth

have already signed up for next year. Cricket at primary or first school typically does not involve the

use of formal facilities, instead being played indoors or on the playground. The Chance to Shine

Programme, which brings cricket back into primary schools and seeks to create strong links

between schools and clubs has however been particularly successful.

4.54 Competitive cricket is also being organised at a secondary school level through the Chance to

Compete however it is thought that pathways to clubs from schools are currently fragmented.

4.55 It is notable that participation and interest amongst school girls in Hinckley and Bosworth is high,

but that there are currently no girls teams in clubs, meaning that there is no outlet for these young

players to continue their interest in the sport.

4.56 There is therefore a strong opportunity for the development of junior cricket in the borough,

particularly using the education sector as a base for developing interest. The EWCB have recently

developed a series of resources for schools and these are accessible to all schools and it is hoped

that this will further stimulate interest.

Assessing the Supply and Demand Information and Views

4.57 The adequacy of facilities for cricket is measured by comparing the amount of wickets available

against the level of use of these wickets. This is considered firstly at a site specific level and then

compiled to present a borough wide picture.

4.58 For cricket, unlike other pitch sports, the capacity of a pitch is measured on a seasonal basis (as

opposed to weekly) and is primarily determined by the number and quality of wickets on a pitch.

Play is rotated throughout the season across the wickets to reduce wear and allow for repair.

4.59 As a guide, the ECB suggests that a good quality wicket should be able to take;

5 matches per season per grass wicket (adults);

7 matches per season per grass wicket (juniors);

60 matches per season per non-turf wicket (adults); and

80 matches per season per non-turf wicket (juniors).

4.60 For sites where the condition of the wicket is poorer, the amount of games that can be sustained

without impact on the condition of the facility is lower.


4.61 Demand is therefore measured in terms of the number of home games that each team will play per

season.

4.62 All competitive cricket in Hinckley and Bosworth Borough currently takes place on grass wickets.

There is limited opportunity to transfer this to non-turf wickets due to a lack of provision, however

several clubs indicate that the provision of non-turf wickets would have reduced the number of

cancellations that have occurred over the course of this season.

Demand at Peak Time

4.63 While use of the wicket across the season is important, the majority of adult demand is from teams

playing in the Leicestershire and Rutland Cricket League on a Saturday afternoon and the

availability of pitches at this time has therefore also been considered. Junior teams and friendly

teams generally play across the week when pitches are available and so access to facilities on a

specific day is less important. Higher numbers of junior teams can however restrict the use of

facilities by midweek teams, therefore having a knock-on effect to the adult game.

4.64 Furthermore, the lack of off field practice facilities also pressurises activities at the cricket club base,

with teams competing for training facilities with junior teams wishing to play competitive fixtures.

The introduction of other schemes such as Chance to Shine adds further requirement for access to

space.

Situation at Individual Sites

4.65 Table 4.5 provides an overview of site specific activity for each of the pitches that offer community

use in Hinckley and Bosworth. It also highlights other issues that have arisen in relation to each site

and summarises the information relating to quality that was presented in previous tables. It clearly

indicates that;

all facilities offering community use are used at least once per week except for Langdale

Park, which was only used three times last season;

there is very little spare capacity available on a peak time (Saturday PM), although some sites

are used by teams travelling from outside of the borough; and

all sites are able to accommodate a little more play based upon the capacity of existing

squares.

4.66 At a site-specific level;

there are no sites that are overplayed and almost all sites can sustain further play across the

season;

Stapleton Village CC, Stoke Golding CC and Hinckley Amateurs CC, as well as Swallows Green

(which acts as overspill site) have the smallest amounts of spare capacity across the season,

with the scope to accommodate only one additional adult team. Spare capacity is highest at

Earl Shilton CC, Hinckley Town CC and Langdale Park;

at almost all sites, training takes place on the grass pitches, meaning that spare capacity is in

reality more restricted than may first appear. The introduction of non-turf wickets and / or


training nets would reduce this usage and ensure that the wickets are maintained for

competitive play;

while across the season there is scope for additional play, capacity is much more restricted at

peak time. Higham on the Hill CC and Swallows Green CC (0.5 match equivalents) are the

only sites that are currently used in the Leicestershire and Rutland League that have any

spare capacity. The only remaining site with scope for use on a Saturday is Langdale Park.

The quality of this facility is likely to mean that it is only suitable for use in the lower divisions

of the Leicestershire and Rutland Cricket League; and

some capacity within Hinckley and Bosworth is used by clubs travelling from other areas. This

equates to 0.5 match equivalents at peak time (at Markfield CC and Market Bosworth CC).

4.67 As noted previously, while there is spare capacity showing at Langdale Park currently, it is known

that this pitch will be used during the 2018 season for league play.

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough: Playing Pitch Strategy Assessment Report

38

Table 4.5: Site Specific Usage

Sit

e N

am

e

No

. p

itch

es

Key F

acil

ity

Gap

s /

Pri

ori

ties

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

of

Str

ips

Req

uir

ed

to

Acco

mm

od

ate

dem

an

d

No

. g

rass

wic

kets

Ad

eq

uacy o

f

Wic

kets

(Am

ou

nt

of

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y)

Matc

h

Eq

uiv

ale

nts

avail

ab

le a

t

peak

tim

e

Co

mm

en

ts

Alans

way/Newbold

Vernon CC

1 No Non Turf wicket. Some

weeds in outfield and

scuffing of wickets

8.8

14 5.2 0 Busy site accommodating large club. No

spare capacity at peak time and one team

is displaced to smaller site. Some capacity

to accommodate further play taking into

account just matches. Training however

adds further usage of the site and the lack

of non turf wicket means that the grass

wickets must be used. Pavilion in good

condition, but improvement required to

outfield.

Barwell Sports and

social club

1 Moss and thatching of

outfield, slight ridge and

furrow effect (club believe

would benefit from

levelling) as well as

cracking on square, update

of nets, no non turf wicket.

Club highlight the

replacement of net surface

as urgent indicating that it

is dangerous and prioritise

improved practice facilities.

7 10 3 0 Some spare capacity on site, but lack of

non turf wicket means that grass wickets

must also be used for training. Added to

this, nets require updating as the condition

is currently drainage. No remaining spare

capacity at peak time and some quality

issues requiring immediate attention (nets).

Club highlight further practice facilities as

their key priority.

Keats Lane /Earl

Shilton CC

1 Mobile practice nets need

attention and club does

not have access to non turf

nets or wicket. Outfield is

slightly uneven

7 15 8 0 Large square means that there is spare

capacity across the season but no

remaining capacity at peak time. Poor

condition of training facilities is likely to

place extra pressures on grass wickets (and


Sit

e N

am

e

No

. p

itch

es

Key F

acil

ity

Gap

s /

Pri

ori

ties

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

of

Str

ips

Req

uir

ed

to

Acco

mm

od

ate

dem

an

d

No

. g

rass

wic

kets

Ad

eq

uacy o

f

Wic

kets

(Am

ou

nt

of

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y)

Matc

h

Eq

uiv

ale

nts

avail

ab

le a

t

peak

tim

e

Co

mm

en

ts

club highlight training nets as key priority),

but quality overall is good although

outfield is slightly uneven. Presence of non

turf wicket means that youth games /

training can take place on non turf wicket

where required to preserve grass wickets.

Higham on the Hill

1 Outfield undulating and

has broadleaved weeds.

Pavilion basic only. No

none turf wicket.

2.2 7 4.8 0.5 Despite small square, site has spare

capacity over the course of the season and

also at peak time (although condition of

pitch means it only meets criteria for lower

league teams). Outfield is undulating and

pavilion is basic only but square is

adequate.

Ashby

Road/Hinckley

Amateurs CC

1 Sloping outfield with some

cracking of square.

9.5 11 1.5 0 Limited spare capacity across the season

and one team displaced at peak time.

Outfield is of limited quality but site is

adequate overall. Growing club with

increasing demands on wicket

Hinckley Road

Recreation Ground

1 No on site training

facilities, basic pavilion. Site

used for informal

recreation

4.4 10 5.6 0 Spare capacity across the week but site full

at peak time. Basic facility only, with no on

site training facilities and issues with the

impact of informal recreation on pitch

quality

Hinckley Sports

and

Social/Hinckley

Town CC

1 No non turf wicket. 8.5 16 7.5 0 Busy site meeting needs of Hinckley Town

CC as well as City Cricket Academy. No non

turf wickets limits opportunities for training

and spread of activity on the wicket and

club highlight training nets as their key

priority. Ongoing investment taking place

in pavilion and drainage. Spare capacity

available over the course of the season but

no remaining activity can take place at


Sit

e N

am

e

No

. p

itch

es

Key F

acil

ity

Gap

s /

Pri

ori

ties

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

of

Str

ips

Req

uir

ed

to

Acco

mm

od

ate

dem

an

d

No

. g

rass

wic

kets

Ad

eq

uacy o

f

Wic

kets

(Am

ou

nt

of

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y)

Matc

h

Eq

uiv

ale

nts

avail

ab

le a

t

peak

tim

e

Co

mm

en

ts

peak time.

Jubilee Playing

Fields / Altar

Playing Fields

Markfield

1 No practice nets or non

turf wickets. Uneven

square. Lack of facilities

(sight screens etc)

4.4 9 4.6 0 Spare capacity across the season but no

remaining capacity at peak time. Venue

used as overspill for two Leicester City

based clubs. Facility quality is limited and

there are no on site training facilities, but

these are not required as clubs use

facilities at their own home ground and

only require the pitch for competitive

activity. No home club at the site.

Langdale Park

1 No nets, no non turf

wicket. Weeds on outfield

and poor square with

evidence of doughnuts and

unevenness.

0.6 8 7.4 1 Extensive spare capacity across the season

and site has the ability to sustain 1 match

equivalent at peak time in theory. In

practice the current condition of the pitch

is likely to preclude league based activity.

Site has only sustained three games during

2017 and therefore currently has a limited

role in cricket in the borough.

Market Bosworth

Sports

Club/Bosworth CC

1 Weeds and funghi on

outfield, vertidraining has

taken place but field is

poor. Requires reseeding.

No training nets or non turf

wickets

4.4 10 5.6 0 Small club site with spare capacity across

the season but no remaining scope for

more teams at peak time as club

accommodates team displaced from

Warwickshire. New pavilion and pitch

quality reasonable, but site suffers from

sharing with football as well as unofficial

use. Outfield demonstrates signs of weeds

and funghi, highlighting a need for

improved maintenance and training

facilities are also required.

Ratby Sports Club

1 Damage to square and

square was uneven which

may impact ball flight.

6.5 8 1.46 0 Site with limited spare capacity and no

remaining opportunities available at peak

time. There is no non turf wicket to support


Sit

e N

am

e

No

. p

itch

es

Key F

acil

ity

Gap

s /

Pri

ori

ties

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

of

Str

ips

Req

uir

ed

to

Acco

mm

od

ate

dem

an

d

No

. g

rass

wic

kets

Ad

eq

uacy o

f

Wic

kets

(Am

ou

nt

of

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y)

Matc

h

Eq

uiv

ale

nts

avail

ab

le a

t

peak

tim

e

Co

mm

en

ts

Outfield also uneven with

some weeds. No non turf

wicket

junior development and quality issues

highlighted with both the outfield and the

square, although drainage has improved

and permanent covers have been added.

Club identify the need for non turf wicket

to support club development. Clubhouse is

part finished and requires urgent attention.

Stapleton Village

CC

1 No non turf wicket or nets.

Pavilion needs updating.

Molehills encroaching

towards pavilion

4.4 6 1.6 0 Small square impacts potential of site but

small amount of spare capacity remaining

across the season. No further scope at

peak time. Site is basic with no non turf

wicket or nets and a pavilion with only

basic specification. Molehills starting to

encroach towards the pitch.

Stoke Golding

Recreation Ground

1 No non turf wicket or

practice nets. Some bare

patches on wicket, with

sloping outfield and trip

hazard from football lines.

4.4 6 1.6 0 No non turf wicket or practice nets. Some

bare patches on wicket, with sloping

outfield and trip hazard from football lines.

Club highlight need for increased

maintenanace on outfield. Small square

limits seasonal capacity, but scope for a

small amount of additional play. There are

two teams playing on a Saturday meaning

that no further demand could be

accommodated.

Swallows Green

1 No non turf wicket or

training nets. Pavilion

shabby, weeds in outfield

and fairy ring

4.4 6 1.6 0.5 Small square limits capacity of site, but one

additional team could be accommodated

and there is spare capacity at peak time.

Limited quality of site (which experiences

fairy ring and weeds in the outfield, as well

as accommodating only a small pavilion)

may restrict potential uses of the site

within the league. There is a lack of

training accommodation but this is not


Sit

e N

am

e

No

. p

itch

es

Key F

acil

ity

Gap

s /

Pri

ori

ties

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

of

Str

ips

Req

uir

ed

to

Acco

mm

od

ate

dem

an

d

No

. g

rass

wic

kets

Ad

eq

uacy o

f

Wic

kets

(Am

ou

nt

of

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y)

Matc

h

Eq

uiv

ale

nts

avail

ab

le a

t

peak

tim

e

Co

mm

en

ts

critical as the site currently functions as

overspill only.

Twycross CC

1 Lack of non turf wickets,

limited pavilion facilities

6 11 5 0 Scope to increase the amount of play

across the season but two teams playing in

the Leicestershire and Rutland League

means that there is no remaining capacity

at peak time. Small pavilion with limited

facilities and no training facilities are

currently available.


Current Picture of Provision

4.68 The site overviews set out in Table 4.5 can be used to develop an overall picture of provision across

Hinckley and Bosworth. This is set out in Table 4.6 and illustrated in Chart 4.5. It demonstrates that

there is scope to accommodate circa 45 additional adult teams across the week if all available strips

on all wickets were used. There is however only 1 match equivalent available on a Saturday

afternoon (0.5 at two sites) at sites already used in the Leicestershire and Rutland League, plus

scope to accommodate matches at Langdale Park (not currently used for league cricket).

4.69 Table 4.6 summarises the adequacy of provision across the borough as a whole and breaks it down

within the two sub areas. It indicates that reflecting the strong availability of sites across the season,

there is spare capacity across both sub areas. There is also availability at peak time in both areas (as

noted previously, it is now known that Langdale Park will be used by Bombay United from the 2018

season).

Table 4.6: Cricket Pitch Provision - Capacity

Sub Area Total Spare Capacity (Max

number of adult teams that

could be accommodated)

Sites with Spare Capacity to

accommodate at least one

additional adult team across the

season (2 strips or more)

Spare

Capacity at

Peak Time

Sites with

Peak Time

Spare

Capacity

Hinckley and

Burbage

23 strips, 17 additional adult

teams

Burbage CC (4 teams), Hinckley

Town CC (5 teams), Langdale Park

(5 teams), Swallows Green (1

team), Hinckley Amateurs (1 team)

1.5 match

equivalents

Swallows

Green,

Langdale

Park

Northern

Parishes


teams

Market Bosworth Sports Club (4

teams), Jubilee Playing Fields (3

teams), Twycross CC (4 teams).

Ratby Sports Club, Stapleton

Village CC and Stoke Golding

Recreation Ground (all one team)

Higham on the

Hill (0.5 match

equivalents)

N/a

Boroughwide

total


teams

Chart 4.5: Borough Wide Spare Capacity

4.70 Table 4.6 and Chart 4.5 therefore reinforces the message outlined earlier indicating that while

existing pitches are able to accommodate more play across the season, spare capacity is much


more limited at peak time. There is however sufficient capacity within the pitch stock for clubs to

accommodate teams from outside the borough at peak time, suggesting that there are limited

pressures on the pitch stock. While there is some displacement of teams from within Hinckley and

Bosworth, this arises due to the lack of second ground within the club base and the demand is

accommodated within Hinckley and Bosworth itself.

4.71 None of the responding clubs identified a lack of pitches as a key issue for the borough and it is

clear that there is spare capacity in both the urban area and in the Northern Parishes.

Latent and Unmet Demand

4.72 Across the borough therefore there appears to be sufficient capacity to meet current demand and

there is no evidence of latent demand within cricket clubs. Indeed, many clubs have experienced

recent decline and would therefore have the capacity to accommodate increased activity should

this arise again.

Future Picture of Provision

4.73 While there is currently adequate provision in quantitative terms (although qualitative issues have

been identified), population growth will impact upon future demand, as will changes in

participation trends. These issues are considered in turn in order to build an accurate picture of

future demand.

Population Change

4.74 Team Generation Rates (TGRs) indicate how many people in a specified age group are required to

generate one team. By applying TGRs to population projections, we can project the theoretical

number of teams that would be generated from population growth and gain an understanding of

future demand.

4.75 Table 4.7 summarises the current TGRs for cricket and uses them to evaluate the potential impact of

projected changes to the population profile on demand. It reveals that population growth and

changes to the population profile will result in;

an increase in the number of people aged between 18-55 that is insufficient to generate any

further teams; and

up to 2 additional junior teams created.


Table 4.7: Impact of Changes to the Population Profile

Sport and Age

Groups

Number

of Teams Current

population

in age

group

within the

area

Current

TGR

Future

population

in age

group

within the

area (2036)

Change in

population

Potential

Change in

Team

Numbers

in Age

Group

(Number

of Teams)

Cricket Open Age

Mens (18-55yrs)

31 25742 830 25839 97 0.1

Cricket Open Age

Womens (18-55yrs)

0 25742 0 25839 97 0

Cricket Junior Boys

(7-18yrs)

17 6573 387 7403 830 2.1

Cricket Junior Girls

(7-18yrs)

0 6573 0 7403 830 0

4.76 In terms of pitch requirements, this would result in;

demand for senior cricket pitches remaining static; and

a need to accommodate circa 14 junior matches per season.

4.77 Given that there is spare capacity within the current stock, the above levels of growth in

participation can easily be accommodated. Total spare capacity in the borough equates to around

45 adult teams.

4.78 It should be noted that while Table 4.7 indicates that the TGR for female cricket is 0, this is based

upon the current situation in terms of the number of teams that are run. Female cricket is both a

target area and a current growth area and it is likely that the number of teams run will increase in

the coming years. This will be discussed below under the heading participation trends and growth

aspirations.

Participation Trends and Growth Aspirations– Impact on Pitches

4.79 The Leicestershire County Cricket Club is seeking to implement a sustainable approach to the

development of cricket, retaining existing players and developing new players at both junior and

adult level, in line with the new ECB Strategy Cricket Unleashed.

4.80 The strategy seeks to support sustainable increases in club membership and increased participation

in cricket over the strategy period. The key priorities of this strategy are summarised in Table 4.8.

Table 4.8: Key Objectives of Cricket Unleashed (ECB 2016)

Objectives Delivery Mechanisms Outcomes

Making the game more accessible

and inspiring the next generation

of players, coaches, officials and

volunteers

Growing clubs and leagues

(including investing in support

roles and development tools to

simplify club and league

Number of people playing

cricket

Number of U16 playing



management

Kids - providing more

opportunities for children to play

through schools

Community - diversifying to

ensure all sectors of the

community embrace cricket

Casual - breaking down barriers

and improving access. This will

include indoor cricket as well as

informal and small sided formats

of the game.

cricket.

Deliver winning teams that inspire

and excite through on-field

performance and off-field

behaviour.

Pathway for talented players

Supporting talented teams

Working with elite teams

Focusing on clear plans for

success in England teams

Performances in World Cups

and International Test Series.

Consistent and clearly defined

county pathways.

Create inspired fans Fan focused - improve fan

experience and engage with club

members to understand needs

New fans - attract a new audience

Global Stage - maximise

opportunities from hosting global

events

Broadcast and digital - seek to

improve to attract new and

enhance experience for existing

fans.

The number of people who

have an interest in cricket.

The number of U16 who

attend cricket matches.

We will make decisions in the best

interests of the game and use the

power of cricket to make a positive

difference.

Integrity - promote and adopt

best practice standards of

governance

Community programmes - to

make a positive difference

Environment - work to promote

environmental sustainability

One plan - develop local

strategies seeking to deliver the

Coordinated local plans.

The number of people that

benefit from community

programmes.



national plan.

Strong finance and operations -

Deliver winning teams that inspire

and excite through on-field

performance and off-field

behaviour.

People - support and recognise

the roles of volunteers and staff

within the game

Revenue and reach - build

stronger revenue streams and

commercial partners

Insight - invest in improving

understanding of how people

engage with cricket

Operations - deliver efficient and

response administration.

Financial sustainability of

cricket.

Investment in delivery of

strategy.

4.81 While population growth may have limited impact as a result of the projected ageing population

(and therefore a reduction in the propensity to play cricket), achievement of the key goals of the

national strategy are likely to have a positive impact on club membership and demand for cricket

in Leicestershire.

4.82 Local versions of new initiatives are already in place and several clubs are already running the All

Stars Initiative, as well as activities designed to increase participation amongst women and girls.

Success has already started to be seen in terms of club growth, with Burbage CC in particular

highlighting growth in the junior section on the back of All Stars. There is also increasing interest in

cricket amongst women and girls which is likely to lead to greater participation in cricket amongst

females in future years.

4.83 Linking with the aspirations of the Leicestershire County Cricket Club, many of the cricket clubs

have some aspirations for growth. This is however set into a picture of recent decline and so many

clubs are currently battling to retain existing players, rather than to create new. It is also hoped that

increasing numbers of players will enhance the number of players in each squad, creating greater

stability (and rather than creating new teams).

4.84 Table 4.9 considers the aspirations of each club (and the realistic targets that Leicestershire County

Cricket Club believes are appropriate) and based upon the current situation, the impact of the

achievement of these aspirations in terms of the adequacy of provision.

4.85 It suggests that there is broadly sufficient provision in both the urban area and in the Northern

Parishes, with no clubs identified as having any clear unmet demand. Both clubs with significant

growth aspirations have the ability to accommodate these easily within their existing infrastructure.

4.86 Several clubs do however have relatively limited opportunity for club growth if demand were to

arise, with only scope for one additional team. These clubs are;

Hinckley Amateurs

Ratby


Stapleton

Stoke Golding.

4.87 Capacity pressures are therefore evident in both the northern parishes and the urban area if future

demand were to arise.


Table 4.9: Adequacy of Provision to Meet Aspirations for growth. S

ite n

o

Sit

e N

am

e

Ad

eq

uacy o

f

Wic

kets

(Am

ou

nt

of

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y)

Matc

h

Eq

uiv

ale

nts

avail

ab

le a

t

peak

tim

e

Ad

dit

ion

al

Ad

ult

team

s

Gro

wth

Asp

irati

on

s

Nu

mb

er

of

ad

dit

ion

al

gam

es

req

uir

ed

Co

mm

en

t

Northern Parishes

Alans way/Newbold Vernon CC

5.17142857 0 4 Growth Aspirations can be

sustained

Northern Parishes

Barwell Sports and social club


sustained

Northern Parishes

Keats Lane /Earl Shilton CC

8.08571429 0 6 3 youth 18 Growth Aspirations can be

sustained

Northern Parishes

Higham on the Hill

4.8 0.5 3 Growth Aspirations can be

sustained

Urban Area Ashby Road/Hinckley Amateurs

CC


sustained

Urban Area

Hinckley Road Recreation

Ground

5.6 0 4 1 youth by 2019

and further to build

section

6 Growth Aspirations can be

sustained

Urban Area Hinckley Sports and

Social/Hinckley Town CC


sustained

Northern Parishes Jubilee Playing Fields / Altar

Playing Fields Markfield


sustained

Urban Area

Langdale Park


sustained

Northern Parishes Market Bosworth Sports

Club/Bosworth CC


sustained

Northern Parishes

Ratby Sports Club


sustained

Northern Parishes

Stapleton Village CC


sustained

Northern Parishes Stoke Golding Recreation

Ground


sustained

Urban Area

Swallows Green

1.6 0.5 1 Growth Aspirations can be

sustained

Northern Parishes Twycross CC 5 0 4 Growth Aspirations can be


sustained


Forthcoming Changes to Supply

4.88 There are no confirmed forthcoming changes to the supply of cricket pitches within the Borough of

Hinckley and Bosworth.

4.89 It should be noted however that 1.5 match equivalents currently playing within Hinckley at peak

time (Saturday PM) is imported from other local authorities. The City Council and the Leicestershire

County Cricket Club are working alongside clubs to address this situation and to both improve the

quality and quantity of facilities within Leicester to reduce this exported demand.

4.90 Should these priorities be successfully delivered, spare capacity in Hinckley and Bosworth will

increase (creating opportunities for further play on a Saturday) without additional facilities being

provided.

4.91 It is known however that a further team (Bombay Cricket Club) will be playing in Hinckley and

Bosworth during the 2018 season on a Saturday.

Summary and Key Issues

4.92 The key issues arising from analysis of the context and issues for this playing pitch assessment in

Hinckley and Bosworth are summarised below.

Cricket - Key Issues

There is a need to protect existing sites - all pitches are well used and required to sustain demand.

Langdale Park provides an opportunity to increase cricket in the borough

Concerns over the security of tenure at key sites

Opportunities to improve maintenance at sites across the borough and a need to enhance the

succession planning at all clubs

Quality issues (most notably poor outfield), but particularly where these are impacting club

progression

Lack of training facilities at the majority of sites (there are no facilities at all at Barwell Sports Club,

Burbage CC, Market Bosworth Sports Club, Stapleton Village CC, Stoke Golding CC).

5: Bowls


Introduction

5.1 This section assesses the adequacy of bowling greens in Hinckley and Bosworth by presenting

an overview of supply (quantity, quality, accessibility and availability) and an overview of

demand.

Supply

5.2 Table 5.1 summarises the stock of bowling greens and reveals that there are 11 sites

containing functional outdoor bowling greens. There is one green on each site, meaning that

there are 11 greens across Hinckley and Bosworth. Five of the 11 greens are in the urban area

with the remainder in the northern parishes.

Table 5.1: Bowling greens in Hinckley and Bosworth

Site

Ownership /

Management

Number of

Greens

Club Name Sub Area

Bridge Road / Rugby

Road

Owned and managed

by Burbage Parish

Council 1

Burbage Crusaders /

Burgess Bowls Club

Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area

Burbage

Constitutional Burbage Constitutional

Bowls Club 1

Burbage

Constitutional Bowls

Club

Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area

Hinckley Bowling Club Owned and managed

by Hinckley Bowls Club 1 Hinckley Bowls Club

Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area

Hollycroft Park Hinckley and Bosworth

Borough Council 1

Hollycroft Park Bowls

Club

Hinckley Ladies Bowls

Club

Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area

Bagworth Bowling

Club

Leased by club from

Parish Council.

Maintained by Club 1

Bagworth Bowls Club

Northern

Parishes

Barlestone Bowling

Green

Owned and managed

by Barlestone Bowls

Club 1

Barlestone Bowls

Club

Northern

Parishes

Barwell Bowls Club

Barwell Sports Club 1

Barwell Bowls Club

Northern

Parishes

Sport in Desford

Sport in Desford 1 Desford Bowls Club

Northern

Parishes

Kingscroft Bowls Club

Owned and managed

by Kingscroft Bowls

Club

1

Kingscroft Bowls Club

Northern

Parishes

Market Bosworth

Bowling Green

Owned by Club

Trustees, maintained

by club 1

Market Bosworth

Bowls Club

Northern

Parishes

Sweetpea Bowling

Green

Green owned by TTG

Inns Ltd. Buildings

owned by club.

Facilities managed by

club 1

Sweet Pea Bowls Club

Hinckley /

Burbage

Urban Area


5.3 Table 5.1 therefore demonstrates that all existing greens accommodate at least one club.

Quality

5.4 Site visits to bowling greens were undertaken during the playing season and a non-technical,

visual assessment was made in an attempt to provide a comparative overview of the greens

and highlight any issues. It is essential to ensure that the green surface means that the bowls

run at an appropriate speed.

5.5 Site visits reveal that all existing bowling greens are functional and fit for purpose, with overall

quality scores ranging from 57% to 86%, suggesting that there is quite a range in the standard

of provision. The average score of 76% suggests that most greens are of standard quality.

5.6 There is no pattern relating to the quality of greens in terms of geographical distribution. It is

clear however that while the higher quality facilities are in general owned and managed by

private clubs, public facilities are by and large of slightly lower quality and often have more

restricted maintenance regimes. That said, Hollycroft Park, managed and maintained by

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council is one of the better facilities in the borough

according to site visits.

5.7 Several of the sites also contain social facilities including a bar and social area. As well as being

attractive to potential participants, this improves the sustainability of the club, with greater

income from bar takings enabling investment to be channelled into the management and

maintenance of facilities. Several clubs highlighted the small clubhouses and lack of associated

social facilities as one of the key barriers to growing participation for clubs using these venues

and indeed, the presence of a bar and ability to put on social functions is perceived to be a

key component of a sustainable facility. Some sites were however perceived to lack facilities

within club houses (such as heating) and challenging access routes over rough land and / or

poor parking were also highlighted as key concerns.

5.8 Chart 5.1 summarises the quality scores achieved through site visits. It indicates that green

quality is relatively consistent across most criteria and that sites are on the whole, fit for

purpose. Cleanliness is the most highly rated attribute (lack of litter and graffiti) with mowing

frequency also rated well. Spectator provision and storage, as well as the grass cover were

identified as key areas for improvement, with several greens exhibiting bare patches and

patches of weeds. It is however noted that several greens are undulating / sloping and require

levelling to enable bowls to be played at a high standard.

5.9 Several grounds also demonstrated thatching (Barwell Sports Club, Sweetpea Bowling Club,

Burbage Constitutional Bowls Club, Hollycroft Park), as well as areas of moss in the grass

sward and two greens also exhibited signs of fusarium at the time of visit. This suggests that

there are issues in the maintenance of the greens, with verti cutting not being undertaken

frequently enough. For those greens where fusarium was evident (Hinckley Bowls Club, Rugby

Road Recreation Ground), it was clear that disease had been caught early and damage had

therefore been kept to a minimum. For greens scoring more poorly, the quality of the surface

(uneven, divots and patchy) was the key issue.

5.10 While the quality of maintenance undertaken varied, the majority of greens appeared tidy and

well cared for and most were equipped with artificial grass on the ditch walls and or / rubber

crumb or sheeting in the gutters. Paths were in general in reasonable condition, and gutters /

channels and ditches were well maintained.

5.11 Although the basic infrastructure of facilities is adequate, several sites have poor or limited car

parking. Parking for Hollycroft Park is either roadside, or in the park car park at the bottom of

the hill (requiring bowlers to walk up) while Market Bosworth BC and Burbage Constitutional

Bowls Club also have only roadside parking.

Chart 5.1: Quality Scores for Bowling Greens (Site Visits)


Club Views on Quality

5.12 Building upon the site assessments, clubs were asked for their views on the stock of bowling

greens. While only two responding clubs indicated that that they were dissatisfied with

provision, both of these attributed their identified issues to the quality of facilities23% of clubs

indicated that quality issues that they experience inhibit the club development.

5.13 Varying perceptions of green quality were however evident, with scores attributed to the club

greens rated between 46% and 100%, demonstrating a greater variation than was found by

site visits. Similar findings were however evident and the same sites were considered poorer

by both clubs and in site visits.

5.14 Reinforcing the site visits, grass cover and the quality of the playing surface were identified as

key areas for improvement by clubs, with several raising concerns about uneven, patchy areas

and bald areas. Skills to undertake appropriate maintenance were raised as a key concern by

several clubs, with the key issues raised being;

those undertaking the maintenance are not skilled / specialist and / or have had no

training;

the cost of maintenance is high; and

the age of those volunteers is a concern, and there is becoming a greater reliance on

external contractors, which impacts on the finances of the club.

5.15 Many clubs within the borough are responsible for their own management and maintenance.

Of those who are, only 2 clubs indicated that they don’t believe that they have the necessary

skills to undertake these activities. The remainder all felt that their greens were well

maintained and that they were well equipped to ensure that this continued. Finding volunteers

with the right skills and time to undertake green maintenance remains a challenge however.

5.16 It should also be noted that the management of the green can also contribute towards issues

with quality. For example, some clubs do not move the rink setting, overusing one area and

creating ridges. Again, this is potentially down to lack of training and awareness.

5.17 Changing facilities and clubhouses were considered to also require investment and car parking

was also rated poorly. Several clubs also felt that there was room for improvement in terms of

the facilities that are provided for spectators. Most clubs felt their site to be tidy and clean


(free from litter) again reflecting the site visits. Chart 5.2 illustrates the perceived quality of

bowling greens (clubs).

Chart 5.2: Perceived quality of bowling greens (Clubs)

5.18 Building upon the general issues identified, Table 5.2 summarises the key issues identified by

site. It clearly indicates that there is a degree of variation in the quality of facilities and that

there are issues at sites across the borough.

5.19 Table 5.2 includes both the full site visit score and also the % score for the condition of the

green only, which is considered to be the most important element of the green.


Table 5.2: Quality of bowling greens

Site Name Quality

Rating

Site Visit

(%)

Site Visit Comments Club Perception

Bagworth

Bowling Club

Standard

71% (75%

condition

of green

only)

Astroturf ditches and gutters,

mainly flat but some bits are

uneven. Tidy edges and paths

Some moss and weeds in sward.

Maintained by club who

don’t believe they have

appropriate skills as most

trained people no longer

bowl. New greenkeeper

soon to start. Green

standard despite

maintenance issues, but

hope new keeper will

improve facilities. Club

currently use local

community centre for

teas but costs have

increased and so they

wish to expand their own

pavilion in order to

accommodate teas on

site.

Barlestone

Bowling

Green

Standard

76% (70%

condition

of green

only)

Limited private parking, good

sized bowling pavilion with good

facilities, the gutters are astro-

turfed, and some wooden

boards. Repairs to bare patches

seeded, green was being

irrigated at time of visit and had

just been cut. Some moss and

weeds in sward.

Improvements recently seen to

green.

Green in good condition

with a strong volunteer

base.

Barwell Bowls

Club

Standard

74% (75%

condition

of green

only)

Green showing moss and

thatching, worm casts and being

swished at time of visit. Sloping

green.

Tidy site. Rubber crumb and

timber gutters.

Adjacent to indoor green but

limited existing relationship.

Lack of disabled facilities but site

includes bar.

Grass cover good and

playing surface

acceptable however

surrounding paths are

poor. There is a

pronounced slope from

the cricket pitch towards

the road which affects the

bowling. Overall green

and pavilion considered

acceptable.

Bridge Road /

Rugby Road

Poor

57% (50%

condition

of green

only)

Green has fusarium and there are

some areas that have been filled

with black powder soot. Astro

sides and rubber gutter. The

paths are quite narrow in places

so bare patches on one edge.

Green slopes away.

The pavilion is quite big and with

Poor playing surface and

paths, grooves and ridges

deflect bowls. Bare

patches and issues with

maintenance around

edges of green (since

been addressed and a six

month improvement plan

has been implemented


Site Name Quality

Rating

Site Visit

(%)


reasonable facilities including

disabled facilities. Poorest quality

facility overall.

Limited bar on occasion only.

This impacts sustainability.

on the green). Paths also

poor. Sprinkler system

recently failed. Perception

that specialist fine turf

maintenance is required.

Pavilion too small to

accommodate all players.

Clubhouse unheated and

accessed over rough

ground so can’t be use

for evening functions.

Burbage

Constitutional

Standard

79% (85%

condition

of green

only)

Some weed on the green and

some of the paths are narrow,

some thatching. Roadside

parking only which is particularly

problematic when games clash

with church activities.

Smaller green that can be played

in one direction only - narrow.

No disabled access.

Club accesses constitutional club

for bar.

Green adequate with

acceptable playing

surface. Poor car parking

- ask visiting clubs to

share transport.

Maintained by club

groundsman

Sport in

Desford

Poor -

Standard

81% (80%

condition

of green

only)

Bowling green part of wider

community leisure centre.

Standard condition apart from

some damage to the surface

/bear patches. The site is tidy.

Some recent issues with

maintenance later in the season.

Requires specialist maintenance.

Green also suffers from water

retention

The pavilion is in excellent

condition. Club have access to

own room with teas and bar as

well as Sport in Desford facilities.

Located on edge of

village meaning car

ownership is essential.

Green surface is not level

and is being slowly

levelled by additional top

soil each year. Slowly

improving but playing

surface currently poor.

Hinckley

Bowling Club

Standard

- good

79% (80%

condition

of green

only)

Green usually in good condition

but recent issues identified.

Bowling green has had fusarium

hence the patches where it has

been treated. Thatching on the

green, good facilities in a

residential location. Astro turf

sides and rubber gutters.

Generally tidy site. Roadside

parking only

Good but members that

maintain site are growing

older and there is a need

for outside help to

continue to keep it at its

best. Good green and

comfortable clubhouse

including access for

wheelchairs and

spectators with good

viewing facilities.


Site Name Quality

Rating

Site Visit

(%)


Hollycroft

Park

Standard

81% (80%

condition

of green

only)

Well kept bowling green in green

flag park. The gutters are rubber

and astroturf. There are some

weeds in the green and some

thatching. Car park some

distance from green.

Changing pavilion and toilets

adequate.

Green not fenced off.

Occasional problems with

green and playing

surface. Some issues with

bare patches and fall

away at end of rinks but

adequate overall. Pavilion

too small and has

cleanliness issues. In need

of refurbishment. Club

also does not have sole

use of pavilion and toilets

must be accessed via the

changing room. Car park

location poor in relation

to bowling green and

bowlers struggle to walk

equipment up the hill.

Kingscroft

Bowls Club

Good

81% (90%

condition

of green

only)

Bowling green had refurb in

2016 with complete reseed. In

remarkable condition,

considering. Well supported

club, tidy well-kept site in

excellent condition.

Routine maintenance

done by volunteers with

little professional skills or

training. Out of season

maintenance by specialist

contractor expensive but

necessary to retain

surface. Car park surface

is poor and in need of

replacement.

Market

Bosworth

Bowling

Green

Standard

86% (85%

condition

of green

only)

Tidy site in relatively quiet area.

Very tidy site with astro turf and

rubber gutters. Poorly drained.

Some moss and grass in sward.

Roadside parking only.

Green not square so can only be

played in one direction.

Green in good condition.

Poor parking.

Sweetpea

Bowling

Green

Standard

76%

Bowling green to rear of pub,

buildings owned by Club. Part of

the pub has been burned down.

The green has just been spiked

which is good as it may reduce

the thatching to the green

Rubber crumb gutters astro

sides. Tidy but shabby site, needs

updating. Some thatch in the

grass sward.

Wooden pavilion of own and

includes bar and kitchen.

Green in good condition

although lack of

automatic watering

system means it is

difficult to maintain

surface in dry periods. On

site pub currently closed

due to fire, club

maintenance is restricted

due to funds and

necessary fees under

terms of lease.

Accessibility

5.20 Consultation with bowls clubs demonstrates that on average, 39% of participants travel

between 1 and 3 miles to reach a green, while a further 33% travel under 1 mile. This means


that most people play at greens local to their home. Just 8% of bowlers travel more than 5

miles. This is illustrated in Chart 5.3.

Chart 5.3: Average Travel Distance to Bowling Greens from Home

5.21 Map 5.1 therefore illustrates the location of each of the greens in the borough and includes

both a 1 and 3 mile catchment area around each green.

5.22 It indicates that bowling greens are well distributed across the borough, with four facilities in

the Hinckley / Burbage urban area and the remainder dispersed across the Northern Parishes.

There is however relatively poor coverage to the west of the borough, where residents must

travel much further to reach a green.


Map 5.1: Bowling greens in Hinckley and Bosworth


Demand

5.23 Nationally, the Sport England Active People survey indicates that participation in outdoor bowls

has declined over the 2005 - 2016 period. In 2005 0.83% of the adult population played outdoor

bowls at least once a week. By 2016 this dropped to 0.51%. Chart 5.4 illustrates this graphically.

Chart 5.4: Participation in outdoor bowls (England 2006-2016) (extracted from Sport

England)

Market Segmentation

5.24 Sport England Active People Survey and Market Segmentation data enables evaluation of the

proportion of the population that currently play bowls. For Hinckley and Bosworth, it demonstrates

that the amount of people playing is inconsistent, with particularly lower levels of participation in

the more urban areas (represented by the darker purple shaded areas).

5.25 Comparison of Map 5.2 with Map 5.1 (which outlined the location of existing bowling greens)

suggests that this is not really influenced by the location of existing greens, as there are accessible

greens in all areas of the borough.


Map 5.2: Participation in Bowls across Hinckley and Bosworth (Sport England Market

Segmentation)

5.26 Market segmentation reveals that overall, across Hinckley and Bosworth there are 893 people

playing bowls currently. These players fall primarily in the older age profiles of Elsie and Arnold and

Frank. The proportion of people in each segment participating is broadly in line with England and

East Midland averages, although it is below average in the Elsie and Arnold group. There is scope

to increase the amount of players in other groups, most notably Ralph and Phyllis. This may

influence the type of marketing that should be undertaken by clubs in order to successfully

generate new participants.

Actual participation

5.27 Table 5.3 illustrates the current playing membership of bowling clubs on greens across the

borough, highlighting that there are 592 senior adult players and just 5 players aged U18. There is

therefore limited participation at a junior level and poor structures for junior play. Where clubs

have not responded to the survey, affiliation numbers from Leicestershire and Rutland Bowls

Association have been used (club responses have been used where these were received). Total

membership numbers used have however been compared with affiliation data and it is clear that

there is some fluctuation but that membership is relatively consistent.

Table 5.3: Membership of existing clubs

Site

Club Name Club Playing

Membership

Recent

Trends

Sub Area

Bagworth

Bowling Club Bagworth Bowls Club

30 (all senior) Increased Northern

Parishes

Barlestone

Bowling Green

Barlestone Bowls

Club

37 (all senior) Decreased

(lost players to

other clubs)

Northern

Parishes

Barwell Bowls

Club Barwell Bowls Club

39 (provided

by LRBA)

Northern

Parishes

Bridge Road /

Rugby Road

Burbage Crusaders /

Burgess Bowls Club

Burbage

Crusaders - 31

(all senior)

Increased Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area


Site

Club Name Club Playing

Membership

Recent

Trends

Sub Area

Burgess Bowls

Club - 30 (All

senior)

Burbage

Constitutional

Burbage

Constitutional Bowls

Club

44 (provided

by LRBA)

Static Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area

Sport in Desford

Desford Bowls Club

30 (all senior) Increased Northern

Parishes

Hinckley Bowling

Club

Hinckley Bowls Club

90 (all senior) Decreased

(natural

causes)

Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area

Hollycroft Park

Hollycroft Park Bowls

Club

Hinckley Ladies

41 (all senior)

16 (all senior)

Decreased

(natural

causes)

Hinckley /

Burbage

urban area

Kingscroft Bowls

Club Kingscroft Bowls Club

90 (includes 1

youth)

Static Northern

Parishes

Market Bosworth

Bowling Green

Market Bosworth

Bowls Club

67 (includes 2

youth)

Static Northern

Parishes

Sweetpea

Bowling Green Sweet Pea Bowls Club

39 (includes 2

youth)

Static Northern

Parishes

5.28 Table 5.3 clearly indicates that there are no clear trends with regards membership numbers across

Hinckley and Bosworth, with almost equal proportions experiencing growth and decline. This is

illustrated in Chart 5.5. There are also no clear patterns by provider type or by location, suggesting

that club membership trends are site specific and unpredictable.

Chart 5.5: Membership Trends


5.29 While some clubs have experienced an increase in participation, few have grown significantly and

several challenges in relation to growing membership are highlighted;

the lack of interest in bowls and the connotations associated with the sport;

the costs associated with playing and funding improvements;

the perceived poor quality of existing facilities (green and pavilion);

lack of coaches and volunteers; and

the location of sites meaning that awareness of their existence is limited.

5.30 More recent affiliation figures supplied by Bowls Leicestershire suggest that the amount of

members in clubs in Hinckley and Bosworth remains relatively consistent, although again there

have been fluctuations, with some clubs increasing and some clubs in contrast experiencing

decline.

5.31 Chart 5.6 illustrates the key barriers that clubs believe exist in relation to growing membership.

Bowls Leicestershire highlight the importance of quality and believe that poor quality greens act as

a barrier to newcomers, as well as impacting upon the quality of bowls that can be played.

5.32 Chart 5.6: Barriers to the growth of bowls

5.33 All clubs in the borough indicate that they have capacity for new members and are actively seeking

new participants.

5.34 Table 5.3 also clearly demonstrates the older age profile of bowls, with only 5 youth players in the

borough. Consultation with clubs indicates that the majority of players are 60 or above, which

reflects the findings of the Sport England Market Segmentation (earlier in this section). The profile

and connotations associated with bowls are perceived to be central to this. Bowls has potential to


be a family sport for all sectors of the population but does not currently deliver on this potential in

Hinckley and Bosworth. It should be noted that the age profile of bowling clubs is particularly key,

as where clubs have an older membership with fewer younger bowlers, there is a greater danger

that membership will decline due to natural causes.

5.35 In the context of increasing participation being a priority, Chart 5.6 illustrates the views of clubs in

relation to perceived barriers to the growth of bowls. They indicate that there are several issues,

primarily focusing upon the quality of greens and challenges recruiting members and volunteers, as

well as costs associated with participation, rather than the number of greens.

5.36 Other issues highlighted as important by clubs include;

the challenges of managing and maintaining facilities, particularly with regards funding the

work required to maintain sites on a day to day basis and funding larger works that are

needed (such as pavilion improvements);

the importance of the existing volunteer workforce and the concerns that many of these

bowlers are now approaching retirement from bowls, leaving un trained and unskilled club

members to maintain the greens;

the challenges of recruiting and retaining members. Most clubs indicate that they actively

seek to attract new players through advertising and open days as well as word of mouth and

some clubs have recently appointed development officers with a view to attracting more

players (Barlestone Bowls Club, Barwell Bowls Club, Hinckley Bowls Club, Kingscroft Bowls

Club and Market Bosworth Bowls Club.Some clubs highlight that their location out of view

from the road and / or on the edge of villages can restrict opportunities. Issues such as

poorly located car parking / lack of disabled access can also inhibit attempts to secure more

members; and

linking with challenges relating to funding, clubs see the provision of appropriate social

facilities as key to their long-term sustainability, with social functions providing an income to

support the financial position of the club (as opposed to a financial drain when clubs are

forced to hire other venues to put on such activities).

5.37 Sweet Pea Bowls Club also highlight concerns about their long-term security of tenure (the site is

currently rented although they own the buildings, and the on site pub which has recently been

demolished (shut down due to fire) and the impact that this insecurity has on their ability to attract

additional members. The club is also bound by expensive annual fees under the agreement of their

lease and this is becoming unsustainable.

5.38 While the above considers the active participants in the bowling club, the wider role that bowls

clubs play in providing social opportunities is clear, with almost all clubs hosting non playing

members. Social interaction is key to a healthy mind and bowls clubs therefore have a key role to

play in providing opportunities for those that do not wish to (or are unable to) play, but still wish to

be involved within the club. There are 89 non-playing members at existing responding clubs. This

function of bowls clubs reinforces the importance of the effective provision of spectator and social

facilities.

Latent demand


5.39 As well as evaluating the current participation in bowls, The Active People Survey and Market

Segmentation data, enables evaluation of the proportion of the population that would like to play.

This can be used to understand if any latent demand exists and reveals the following;

As illustrated earlier in this section, 893 people in Hinckley and Bosworth are currently

believed to play bowls (this is marginally higher than the known membership of clubs)

201 additional residents would like to play. Unmet demand is fairly evenly spread amongst

different market segmentation groups although is still clearly skewed to the older age

profile, and those groups containing higher numbers of Frank, Roger and Joy and Elsie and

Arnold.

5.40 Map 5.3 indicates that despite current uneven levels of participation, potential demand across the

borough is actually relatively even. This suggests that there is a particular scope to increase

participation within the Hinckley and Burbage urban area.

Map 5.3: Percentage of People wishing to participate in bowls (Sport England Market

Segmentation)

5.41 Market segmentation therefore suggests that there is scope to increase participation in bowls

across the borough, both within the same profile groups as current players and by targeting new

groups.

NGB priorities

5.42 Bowls England is the NGB for Flat Green Lawn Bowls in England. The organization’s strategic plan

(2013 – 2017) indicates that the vision of the organization focuses upon;

promoting the sport;


recruiting new participants; and

retaining existing participants.

5.43 There are no direct priorities relating to facilities, although clearly facilities are an important

component of increasing participation and the Governing Body will seek to support clubs and

county boards through the provision of a variety of online resources. In particular, the Governing

Body highlights the health benefits that bowls can bring and the role of bowls in improving health

issues.

5.44 Consultation with the NGB indicates that key issues for bowls in general include;

the older age profile of members and the impact that this has on growing and maintaining

participation. In particular, there is a lack of people aged 20 - 50 and a dearth of young

people;

the need for greater flexibility in the sport if participation is to increase. Current patterns of

play rely on afternoon / early evening starts, meaning that the sport can be restrictive for

younger members;

the cost of maintaining facilities, declining membership and lack of funding to effect

improvements;

the need for closer involvement with schools and sports development staff;

lack of voluntary help for clubs – coaches and administrators; and

the need to promote new ‘short’ forms of the games (e.g. New age bowls, sets play) to

attract new players with less spare time.

5.45 The Bowls Development Alliance (which is the body for Bowls England and English Indoor Bowling

Association) Whole Sport Plan seeks to;

target those over 55 to increase participation, with a view to ensuring that bowls becomes

the number 1 sport for participants aged 55 and over;

support clubs to provide a quality experience that will maintain club membership;

provide a quality coaching structure including recognised qualifications;

provide more opportunities for those aged 16 and over with a disability; and

overall, the Development Alliance are seeking to bring 10,810 new people into the game.

5.46 The achievement of these goals will be delivered through a variety of means, including packages

for clubs to aid recruitment, Play Bowls Roadshows to promote the sport and working in hot spot

areas.

5.47 A recent research report (October 2016) undertaken by Sport England into the issues facing the

sustainability of bowls reflected many of the concerns raised above, indicating that there is;

falling membership and high age profile of existing members;

reduction in the number of new members;


members are very sensitive to increases in fees, but that increase in membership fees has

been necessary to offset declining numbers; and

increasing maintenance / green upkeep fees

5.48 It concludes that;

recruitment of new members is key to ongoing sustainability;

there is a need to implement sound financial management practices. This includes a need to

explore alternative methods of income generation (a bar / social facilities etc are key to

financial sustainability). There is also a need to maximise secondary income streams (hire out

facilities / sponsorship etc) to ensure that income can be ring fence for a sinking fund;

maintenance costs and machinery are the highest financial burdens - there may be

opportunities to think creatively about how this can be improved (maintenance hubs etc);

the 40 - 55 age group is crucial to reduce the overall age profile and to drive club activities

(but there is a struggle to engage with these groups); and

there is often a reliance on one individual and development business plans need to be put in

place.

5.49 Locally in Leicestershire, it is believed that the recent decline in participation has now been

arrested. While the LRBA seeks to introduce those aged 40+ to bowls, there remain challenges in

recruiting volunteers. Recent successes have however been achieved in the creation of 13 new

Level 2 coaches (2 in Hinckley) as well as over 30 level 1 coaches, who will provide a basis for the

ongoing development of the sport. Nationally, new development officers have also been appointed

to work individually with clubs throughout the country seeking to reverse decline and support club

development. A club development programme is available where clubs have lost more than 10% of

their members within the last three years.

Adequacy of provision

5.50 There are no formal supply and demand models for bowling greens. The adequacy of provision is

therefore evaluated by drawing together the data collated and determining the key issues

impacting current and projected future participation.

Green Quality

5.51 Only two clubs were not satisfied with the existing facilities across Hinckley and Bosworth and both

cited quality not quantity related issues. While there is a good infrastructure in the borough for

bowling overall, Table 5.2 revealed some improvement works that are required as well as ongoing

concerns about the maintenance of existing facilities. There are some poorer quality facilities (rated

poor - the lower edges of standard) and the quality of greens was viewed as being instrumental in

facilitating the ongoing delivery of bowls as well as essential if new players were to be attracted to

the sport. There are however concerns about the skills of those maintaining some greens (as well as

succession planning for future years) as well as the costs associated with fine turf maintenance.

5.52 Several clubs also highlight issues with the size / suitability of their pavilion and the restrictions that

this places on current activities as well as on club development. Social facilities are key to the

sustainability of a green.

Amount of Greens


5.53 Reflecting the spare capacity at all existing sites, as well as the emphasis placed by clubs and key

stakeholders alike on increasing participation, data collated indicates that there is no evidence that

there is a requirement for additional facilities to meet current demand. In particular;

all responding clubs indicate that they have scope to accommodate additional members;

recent participation trends are varying, with an even number experiencing growth and

decline, but all are actively seeking to obtain new members – retention of existing members

and recruitment of new is a key priority for bowling clubs across the borough (and

nationally); and

the average membership of clubs is just 53 playing members and some clubs have fewer

members than this. This is below optimum levels - as a guide, 80-100 members is considered

a very healthy membership for a bowls club, while an average club will have 50 - 60

members.

Protection of Existing Greens

5.54 As guidance, Bowls England suggests that the retention of an existing bowling green is difficult to

support (due to sustainability issues), where membership is below 16 - 20 people. At any one time,

a good quality green can accommodate circa 48 players and the number of club members that can

be sustained is significantly higher.

5.55 Recent research by Sport England (2016) sets a membership target of 15 - 20 members per rink to

ensure that sustainability as a club can be achieved (and that financial and playing requirements

are balanced).

5.56 Analysis of number of members per green, and the number of members per rink in Hinckley and

Bosworth is set out in Table 5.4.

5.57 It indicates that;

that there are no greens where membership levels fall below these targets, although facilities

at Bagworth, Barlestone and Desford host around only 30 members. All three of these clubs

are located in the northern parishes and therefore serve more rural (and often smaller)

communities;

in contrast to the greens accommodating fairly low numbers, membership is particularly high

at Hinckley Bowls Club, Kingscroft Bowls Club, Market Bosworth and Bridge Road,

highlighting the sustainability of these facilities. There is limited scope for expansion of

membership at these sites, although all clubs believe that they are still able to accommodate

further players; and

reflecting the findings revealed when evaluating membership levels per green, use of

facilities per rink highlights that there is relatively high usage at Hinckley Bowls Club and

Kingscroft Bowls Club, while there is particular scope (and need if facilities are to remain

sustainable) at Bagworth Bowls Club, Barlestone Bowls Club and Sport in Desford to increase

play.

Table 5.4: Membership per Green / Rink

Green

Number

of

Greens

Membership

Per Green

Number

of Rinks

Number

of

Members


Per Rink

Bagworth Bowling Club 1 30 6 5

Barlestone Bowling Green 1 37 6 6

Barwell Bowls Club 1 39 6 7

Bridge Road / Rugby Road 1 61 6 10

Burbage Constitutional 1 44 4 11

Sport in Desford 1 30 6 5

Hinckley Bowling Club 1 90 6 15

Hollycroft Park 1 57 6 10

Kingscroft Bowls Club 1 90 6 15

Market Bosworth Bowling Green 1 67 6 11

Sweetpea Bowling Green 1 39 6 7

5.58 The above figures suggest that there is some capacity within the existing facility stock, particularly

at those clubs where membership is hovering below 50. Increases in membership would help to

promote club sustainability.

5.59 There is more limited capacity within the facilities accommodating more than 70 bowlers already

and it is clear that facilities in the urban area are busier in this regard. The average membership per

green is almost 60 in the urban area compared to just 48 in the northern parishes.

5.60 This is illustrated in Table 5.5 below.

Table 5.5: Adequacy of Bowling Greens by Sub Area

Number

of

Greens

Membership

Per Green

Number

of Rinks

Number

of

Members

Per Rink

Urban 5 58.2 28 8.07

Northern

Parishes 6 48.8 36

8.13

5.61 The participation levels at each green suggest that all existing facilities are valuable and should be

protected. While increasing the levels of participation at those with lower membership is key, the

membership levels are not sufficiently low to suggest that facilities are currently unsustainable. The

target levels set by Sport England however clearly indicate that there is a need to increase club

membership in order to maximise both short and long-term sustainability. It should be noted

however that several clubs raise the importance of the balance between a high membership and

the ability of the club to accommodate all members in matches. Some club members worry that the

number of matches that they will play will decrease as the greens become busier.

5.62 Discussions with local representatives of the Bowling Community highlight that the challenges

facing the sport are recognised and there is an acknowledgement that to maintain the existing

infrastructure, and to address increasing maintenance costs, participation increases are required

and driving activity is seen as the key priority in the short term. Retention and improvement of the


existing infrastructure (through green quality, maintenance improvements and succession planning,

as well as pavilion works) will be essential if facilities are to remain fit for purpose in years to come.

5.63 There is also a need to raise awareness of bowling greens and to enhance the presence of clubs in

the local community (signage / hard copy and online advertising).

Future Requirements for Bowls

5.64 Although there is sufficient capacity at existing bowling greens to meet current demand, the profile

of current participants in bowls means that the ageing population is likely to influence participation

more so than for most other sports. Analysis indicates that the proportion of residents aged 55+ is

likely to increase from 34.9% now (2017), to 44.4% in 2036. Table 5.6 summarises this in numerical

terms.

Table 5.6: Increase in the Population aged 55+ in Hinckley and Bosworth

Year 2017 2036

Number of People Aged

55+ 38430

49153

Proportion of the

Population 34.9%

44.4%

Total Increase Increase of 10723 between 2017 and 2036

5.65 As the above numbers suggest, the number of people aged 55+ is likely to increase and the

propensity to participate in bowls is therefore likely to grow. This is likely to stimulate additional

demand for bowling greens in Hinckley and Bosworth and place additional pressures on the

existing infrastructure.

5.66 Table 5.7 summarises the potential impact of the population growth. It presents two scenarios as

follows;

A – using club membership as a base – this provides an accurate reflection of current

participation across the borough (currently); and

B – basing participation on figures according to the Active People Survey (893), which

highlights a degree of latent demand (an additional 201 players potential).

Table 5.7: Calculation of potential growth in bowls

Current Situation

Area considered Current Participation (Known Club

Membership)

Active People Survey

Current Population Aged 38430 38430


55+

Participation in Bowls 584 893 + 201 potential

% of Current Population

Participating in Bowls 1.6%

2.88%

Future Situation (2036)

Future Population aged

55+ 49153

49153

Assumed Future

Participation in Bowls

(participation remains

constant)

1.6%

2.88%

Potential Future

Participants in Bowls 786

1415

Change (2017 - 2036) +202

+321

5.67 Table 5.7 therefore indicates that based upon existing club membership, assuming participation

rates remain constant with existing club membership, demand for bowls is likely to increase by 202

players as a direct result of population growth. Assuming that membership of all greens is even,

this would mean a membership of circa 71 players at each green by 2036, which is still sustainable

within the existing stock (12 players per rink, suggesting additional members would still be

required to ensure sustainability). If higher participation rates were used, this growth would

increase to 128 players per green and provision may be insufficient to meet demand (optimum

membership 80 – 100).

5.68 It is clear however that analysis of existing bowling clubs represents the most accurate means of

determining demand for bowling greens. An average of circa 71 members is therefore likely to be

experienced, which is a very healthy membership. Further players (to meet targets of 15 - 20

members per rink) would however enable a good level of income and a balance between finance

and playing opportunities.

5.69 This suggests therefore that there is sufficient stock of facilities to meet current and future demand

and there is scope for growth within the facility stock.

5.70 It is acknowledged however that growth is unlikely to be even, with the location of new housing

developments significantly impacting the choice of club. The varying membership at club sites

means that some have more capacity than others to sustain additional growth however. It is

notable that particularly in the urban area, capacity is much lower. The scope to accommodate

further play in Market Bosworth will also be limited, given the high levels of play that are already in

existence at this site as well as the fact that the site has a small green on which play can only take

place one way (meaning wear on green will be greater)

5.71 Should issues with Hinckley Sweet Pea Bowls Club lease continue to be apparent, this could lead to

the loss of a green and an increase in average club membership to 59. It should be noted however


that it is in the urban area where greens are already closer to capacity and it in this area where it is

likely that members would be dispersed. It is however thought that many members would be lost

should this green close.

5.72 Future participation in bowls is only therefore likely to grow significantly if a more aggressive

approach to recruitment is taken by clubs and the governing body, in line with the recently

produced Bowls England Strategy. Most clubs are currently seeking to proactively increase

membership, but this largely focuses upon open days, word of mouth and leafleting currently and

there has been little growth. As well as increasing numbers in the typical age profile, there remain

significant opportunities to increase the number of players aged below 60. Bowling offers

significant health (both physical and mental) benefits and achievement of increased participation

would therefore contribute to numerous wider agendas.

Summary and Key issues

5.73 The key issues for bowls are summarised below.

Summary – Bowls

Facility quality requires improvement - playing surface and grass cover identified as key area,

several greens have bare patches and there is evidence of weeds. Some greens undulating

Some issues relating to ancillary facilities and car parking

Opportunities to improve the quality of maintenance. There are concerns about the lack of

specialist training or knowledge, cost and age of volunteers and a consequential need to undertake

some succession planning

There are opportunities to increase play at some sites in particular Bagworth, Barlestone, Sport in

Desford and Burbage Constitutional. There are concerns about the lease at Sweet Pea Bowls Club

Future growth may generate additional demand for bowling (more so than other sports due to the

ageing population). There are greater pressures on greens in urban areas currently.

6: Tennis


Introduction

6.1 This section assesses the adequacy of facilities for tennis by presenting an overview of supply

(quantity, quality, accessibility and availability) and an overview of demand for outdoor courts.

The key findings are then summarised, alongside the issues to be addressed.

Supply

Quantity

6.2 There are 54 active tennis courts with public /community access located at 15 sites. These

courts are split between public (park) sites, schools and private clubs. The split of facilities is

summarised in Table 6.1 which indicates that provision at school sites makes up more than half

of all community accessible tennis courts (although it should be noted that access levels to

these facilities vary and this is outlined in Table 6.2).

6.3 Of the active and accessible courts, 16 are floodlit (30%). 13 out of 16 of these are located at

club bases. Floodlighting extends the capacity of a court by ensuring play can take place during

the winter months, as well as later into the evenings in summer.

Table 6.1: Split of Facilities

Type of Facility Number of Sites Number of Courts Number of Floodlit

Courts

Parks Site 2 4 0

School Site 8 35 3

Club Site 3 13 13

Private Health Club 1 2 0

6.4 In addition to the facilities listed in Table 6.1, there is a former tennis court at Rugby Road,

Burbage. This is now overgrown and unsuitable for use and there is no evidence of a specific

budget for maintenance within Parish Council budgets. The courts at Alans Way, Newbold

Verdon are also poor and almost unsuitable for use (but are included above as they are

maintained as current courts).

6.5 There are also tennis courts at Twycross House School (2) that are not available for public use.

6.6 The specific facilities provided at each site and the level of access available is set out in Table

6.2. It reveals that many schools indicate that they offer community use of their tennis courts

although there is more limited evidence of actual usage. It should be noted that there is fairly

limited level of promotion of the availability of school facilities, however many do list prices and

contact details on their websites.

6.7 Table 6.2 also includes the sub area in which the site is located. It reveals that 19 of the 54

courts are located within the urban area, while the remainder are in the Northern Parishes. This

suggests that facilities for tennis are relatively well distributed. Two of the three clubs are in the

Northern Parishes.


Table 6.2: Tennis courts in Hinckley and Bosworth

Site Name

Area Facility

Type

Number

of

Courts

Number

of Floodlit

courts

Access Arrangements

Playing Fields,

Alans Way,

Newbold

Vernon

Northern

Parishes Park 2 Public facility managed by Parish

Council. Full access.

Market

Bosworth

Tennis Club

Northern

Parishes Club 6 6

Club facility located on site of Dixie

Grammar School. Club allow pay and

play and groups can use facilities by

arrangement.

Hollycroft Park

Tennis Courts

Urban

Area Park 2 0 Public facility managed by Hinckley

and Bosworth Borough Council.

Hinckley

Academy /

John Cleveland

Tennis Courts

Urban

Area School 4

Lettings to local clubs and

independent groups managed by

school. Website includes list of prices

including tennis courts.

Heath Lane

Academy

(formerly

William

Bradford

Community

College)

Northern

Parishes

School 8

Community use agreement in place.

Website provides costs for some

activities although tennis courts are

not detailed within this and

availability is not actively promoted.

Hinckley Sports

Club / Hinckley

Town Tennis

Club

Urban

Area Club 4 4

Club facility. Club allow pay and play

and groups can use facilities by

arrangement.

Sport in

Desford Tennis

Courts

Northern

Parishes Club 3 3 Club facility. Pay and play for none

members permitted.

Hastings High

School -

Burbage

Urban

Area School 6

Other facilities on site are rented out

to groups. Potential access to tennis

courts and website confirms that

facilities are accessible to the

community.

Spindles Health

and Leisure

Centre (Market

Bosworth Hall)

Northern

Parishes Private

Health

Club

2 Accessible to club members only.

Redmoor

Academy

Urban

Area School 3 3

Community use agreement - site

used as overspill facility for Hinckley

Tennis Club. Website confirms that

access is available to facilities.

South

Charnwood

High School

Northern

Parishes School 4 0 No formal agreement but site

managed manages bookings. There

is capacity to increase usage.


Site Name

Area Facility

Type

Number

of

Courts

Number

of Floodlit

courts

Access Arrangements

Brookvale /

Groby Learning

Campus

Northern

Parish School 4 0

School indicate formal agreement is

in place. Website clearly offers

lettings of facilities but does not

provide costs for tennis courts.

Market Bosworth

School

Northern

Parishes School 4 0

Other facilities on site are rented out

to groups and tennis courts are

available. School website includes

lettings policy which specifically

references costs for tennis courts.

St Martins

Catholic

Academy

Northern

Parishes School 2

0

Community use available and tennis

courts are currently used by the

public. Old lettings policy is available

online but there is no active

promotion of facilities available.

6.8 It is therefore evident that while there are numerous facilities at tennis courts on school sites,

access is varying and the level of promotion is limited. It should also be noted that at most

schools, tennis courts are on the same area as other sports (netball / basketball etc) and not all

of the area is always marked for tennis so potential users must compete with demand from

other sports.

Quality

6.9 Site visits to tennis courts were undertaken during the summer and feedback was also gathered

from providers and users. Full site assessment scores can be found in the appendices.

6.10 The average quality score achieved across all sites was 70%, suggesting that most facilities are

fit for purpose, but that there remains scope for improvement. While the majority of courts are

rated as standard (56%), 10% are rated poor.

6.11 Site visits reveal a hierarchy in the quality of provision, with club-based facilities of highest

quality, followed by schools and parks courts. The quality of facilities at school sites is primarily

standard, whilst excluding Hollycroft Park in Hinckley (which is good) parks sites are poor.

6.12 While the quality of these facilities is vastly different, in general these three levels of facility

serve different requirements and different target markets, with clubs often attracting more

serious players and parks courts being used for more informal play (and free to access). The

quality required for these sites to be fit for purpose is therefore varying.

6.13 The average site scores demonstrate that the quality of club bases is above the average for

both public parks and schools. The scores for parks and schools is broadly similar, although this

is influenced by the high score achieved at Hollycroft Park (which negates poor scores achieved

by the remainder of parks facilities).

a. Club sites - 85%

b. School sites - 65%

c. Park sites - 65%.

6.14 There are no clear patterns or variations in quality according to geography.


6.15 Chart 6.1 illustrates the quality of tennis courts across the borough as a whole. It indicates that

spectator seating and storage are the poorest scoring criteria (these are not necessarily

appropriate on all sites however). Of those criteria that apply to all sites, the playing surface and

fencing are the key areas for improvement. Several sites exhibit cracks, weeds and uneven

patches and the nets also require investment on some sites.

Chart 6.1: Quality of Tennis Courts across Hinckley and Bosworth

6.16 Table 6.3 sets out the individual quality scores achieved for each site and identifies the key

areas for improvement. It also notes the comments made in relation to these sites by the

provider / user. It demonstrates that despite the evident variation in quality and the higher

calibre of club facilities, there remain improvements required at all types of facility.

6.17 It is clear that while facilities at club bases and park sites are dedicated facilities for tennis, the

majority of courts on school sites are overmarked for other sports, meaning that tennis must

compete with other activities (and that courts could not be hired for tennis and netball at the

same time for example).

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Avera

ge P

erc

en

tag

e S

co

re a

ch

ieved

Quality Criteria

Quality of Tennis Courts across HInckley and Bosworth


Table 6.3: Quality of Tennis Courts across Hinckley and Bosworth

Site Name Site

Type

Number

of

Courts

Site

Visit

Score

Site Visit Comment Club / Provider Comments Rating

Playing Fields,

Alans Way,

Newbold

Vernon

Former

Courts

2 44% Unsuitable for use, markings virtually

not visible for tennis.

Tennis courts located on all weather pitch. Quality of

surface is average to poor and has declined in recent

years. All weather facility is now over 15 years old and

requires refurbishment within the next 2 years. It is

however regularly maintained to a 6 month schedule. Poor

Market

Bosworth

Tennis Club

Club

6 85%

Good facility with patio seating area for

spectators. All courts in good condition.

Part of school playing field site.

Facilities good. 3 tarmac courts repainted and 3 courts

resurfaced with artificial grass in last 3 years. All

components of site are good - high quality facilities. Good

Hollycroft Park

Tennis Courts Park 2 85%

Courts newly refurbished and only

opened August 2017. New fencing and

equipment also of high quality.

Courts updated 2017 to provide strong park facility.

Supported by routine maintenance. Major refurbishment

2008. No floodlights provided and park closes at dusk

meaning that floodlighting would have limited

opportunity. Good

Rugby Road

Tennis Court,

Burbage Former

Courts 0 0%

Patch of tarmac with very faint lines.

Site becoming overgrown and fencing

is in disrepair. Would require

reinstatement works before use.

None received. No evidence of site being maintained for

tennis any more. Poor

Hinckley

Academy /

John Cleveland

Tennis Courts School 4 65%

Courts in sets of two, standard quality.

Playing surface adequate, line markings

clear but fading in part. One of the only

school sites where courts are not

overmarked.

Quality good overall, no sinking fund in place for repairs,

basic maintenance undertaken only. Standard

William

Bradford

Community

College Tennis

Courts School 8 65%

Four courts are overmarked, others

appear not to be used for tennis

currently. Facilities vary in quality

between standard and poor.

Quality good, maintained by external company. Level

surfaces.

Standard

/ Poor


Site Name Site

Type

Number

of

Courts

Site

Visit

Score


Hinckley Sports

Club / Hinckley

Town Tennis

Club Club 4 79%

All courts good and floodlit. Tennis

facilities part of wider large site

dedicated to sport. Paths would benefit

from improvement.

Well lined and with good equipment, playing surface

acceptable although not as good as at other clubs, with

some signs of deterioration. Poor facilities for spectators,

and changing facilities, clubhouse, car parking and

storage all poor. Floodlighting was installed on all courts

in December 2014 which has brought significant benefits

to the club. General painting and refurbishment of the

premises is carried out by volunteers. Good

Sport in

Desford Tennis

Courts Club 3 91%

Excellent facilities part of larger sports

complex. Paths would benefit from

improvement but all courts good and

floodlit.

Facilities in acceptable condition but line markings

require investment. All courts soon to be patched and

sealed and court surface viewed as key priority for

investment. Changing facilities also poor. Good

Hastings High

School -

Burbage School 2 65% Overmarked with lines for other sports

but clear overall. Reasonable surface. Facilities in good condition overall. Standard

Spindles Health

and Leisure

Centre (Market

Bosworth Hall)

Private

Health

Club 2 0%

Courts standard quality but only

accessible to hotel guests and / or

leisure club members. Standard

Redmoor

Academy School 3 68%

Overmarked with lines for other sports

but clear overall. Reasonable surface. All

three courts are floodlit.

Standard quality facilities, changing accommodation

good. Standard

South

Charnwood

High School School 4 53% Overmarked with netball. Lines clear but

fading in parts.

Tennis courts are in poor condition overall, changing

accommodation is good.

Standard

- poor

Brookvale /

Groby Learning

Campus School 4 65%

Clearly defined line markings, playing

surface acceptable. Overmarked with

netball. Facilities in good condition. Standard

Market Bosworth

School School 4 0%

Not accessible at time of site visit. No.


Site Name Site

Type

Number

of

Courts

Site

Visit

Score


St Martins

Catholic Academy 0% Courts overmarked with other sports.

Limited scope for use currently.

Tennis courts poor and unusable at times. School identify

refurbishment as key priority. Poor


Accessibility

6.18 LTA insight demonstrates that people are typically willing to travel 3km to play tennis. This

increases up to 5km if the courts are floodlit or at a hub site.

6.19 Analysis of the spatial distribution of facilities indicates that;

the three club bases are reasonably well dispersed across the borough, with Hinckley Tennis

Club serving the urban area and Market Bosworth and Desford serving the west and east of

the borough respectively;

access to parks facilities is more limited, with only Hollycroft Park (Hinckley) providing high

quality pay and play courts. The site at Newbold Verdon, the only facility in the Northern

Parishes, is of poor quality;

schools with accessible tennis courts are distributed across the borough and provide more

localised opportunities for those in the more rural settlements that may have to travel further

otherwise to reach facilities; and

despite the equitable distribution of facilities, the rural nature of the borough means that

some residents remain outside of the catchment for tennis courts, particularly in the wider

extremities of the borough. While many to the east are in the catchment of facilities in

Leicester City, there are fewer facilities to the west of the borough in North Warwickshire.

Demand

6.20 The Active People survey indicates that nationally, the proportion of residents playing tennis is

declining. While at the time of AP 1, 1.12% of the adult population was participating, this has now

decreased to 0.94%. More locally, the percentage of adults across Hinckley and Bosworth who play

tennis is represented in map and bar chart form and set out in Map 6.2 and Chart 6.2.


Map 6.2: Percentage and location of the Hinckley and Bosworth adult population who play

tennis

Chart 6.2: Profile of the market segments who participate in tennis

6.21 The key findings from both the map and the bar chart are that:

participation in Hinckley and Bosworth is high, with between 2% and 5% of residents of the

borough playing tennis in almost all areas. The only area of the borough where participation

is lower is in Earl Shilton / Barwell, where between 1.1 and 2% play. There are no clubs in this


area, but residents do have access to tennis courts at school sites and the poor quality public

parks court;

tennis is played across both sexes and that the age of participants is much more widespread

than for most other sports considered. In total 1957 people play tennis, and participation at

least once per month is highest by Tim, Philip and Ben. Participation is significantly higher

amongst those groups than it is nationally; and

while the dominant participants are similar to those playing other sports, it is clear that

tennis provides an effective way of engaging residents who do not participate in some other

sports considered within this assessment. The proportion of participants in the Alison and

Jackie categories are particularly high in Hinckley and Bosworth compared to national

averages, while the proportion of older residents playing is on a par with national levels.

There is scope to increase participation in some sectors of the community, in particular

Leanne and Ralph and Phyllis.

6.22 The Active People analysis of the percentage of adults who would like to play tennis is set out in

Map 6.3 and Chart 6.3. Map 6.3 reveals that propensity to play tennis is consistent across the

borough, despite current uneven levels of play.

6.23 Chart 6.3 illustrates that those that do not currently play but would like to are in similar groups to

current participants, but that there is particular latent demand from Philip and Tim (who are already

high participants) as well as Elaine and Alison. Initiatives to increase participation could therefore

be targeted towards these groups.

Map 6.3: Percentage and location of the adult population who would like to play tennis


Chart 6.3: Profile of the market segments who would like to participate in tennis

6.24 Significantly therefore, tennis is also the only sport where there are more that would like to play

than do actually play (2081 people would like to play). This suggests there is a high level of latent

demand for tennis and the potential to capitalise on this to increase participation. It should be

noted however that this situation arises consistently across the country for tennis and should

therefore be treated with some caution.

Existing participation

6.25 Existing participation in Hinckley and Bosworth takes place in many forms;

formal club membership at club-based sites (and overspill venues where required);

pay and play activity at school facilities; and

more informal play at public park sites.

Informal Play at Public Parks

6.26 There are limited public tennis courts across the borough with the main facility being Hollycroft

Park, managed by Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council. This facility is booked either over the

phone in advance or on site through the kiosk. Records demonstrate that there were 253 individual

users over the period April 2016 - 2017. This represents a low level of use, with LTA estimates and

benchmarking across the country indicating that two court sites within rural areas should be

sustaining between 500 - 1000 individual users each year.

6.27 These figures suggest that there is significant scope to increase usage of facilities. This was also

bourne out during the course of the site visits undertaken, where despite it being summer holidays,

there was only limited evidence of use of the public tennis courts. It should however be noted that

the tennis courts at Hollycroft Park are not locked and therefore are likely to also accommodate

play from people who have not paid but simply turn up and use the facilities, hoping not to be

noticed. Even if official usage figures underestimate the activity that is taking place, it is clear that

there are opportunities for further usage.


6.28 Facilities are chargeable at £7.10 for adults with reduced rates available outside peak time and

concessions. Equipment can also be hired on site, enabling those who do not have their own

rackets etc still to play. Although clubs indicate that they believe these prices to be a barrier to

usage, LTA benchmarking indicates that they are on the high side of average but within the

reasonable spectrum of charging.

6.29 Alans Way Playing Field, Newbold Verdon is one of the only other public managed tennis sites. The

two courts are located on a synthetic surface and are charged at £6 per 30 min hire (fee for the all-

weather facility). Site visits suggest that these courts have received limited use in recent years and

the Parish Council confirm that there is scope to increase levels of activity.

6.30 LTA Insight research demonstrates that public courts are a key part of the provision hierarchy, with

more than 50% of play taking place at such facilities and these sites being instrumental in grass

roots tennis. In particular, research suggests that these are likely to attract a higher proportion of

younger people (aged 14 - 29) while older players will gravitate towards clubs.

6.31 Linking with their new strategy, the LTA see increasing participation in public parks as a key priority.

It is essential however that these facilities remain sustainable. LTA guidance seeks to promote

online booking / key pads etc in order to accurately track usage and to ensure a strong online and

on site presence to increase awareness of the availability of courts.

6.32 The quality of public courts is also deemed to be essential if they are to be effective in developing

grass roots tennis. It is estimated that circa £1200 per annum per court should be put into a sinking

fund to enable repair works.

Pay and Play Access at School sites

6.33 Analysis of facilities at school sites suggests that there is a reasonably good level of access to tennis

courts at secondary schools although it is clear that there is very little promotion of the

opportunities available and / or the fees charged.

6.34 Where prices are available, fees are generally higher than those listed for public courts and some

schools require use to be block booked (ie 10 sessions) rather than offering pay and play

opportunities. It should also be noted that many tennis courts are shared with netball and they are

therefore not available for hire all year round.

6.35 Hinckley Tennis Club is currently using Redmoor Academy as an overspill facility and St Martins

Catholic Academy indicate that there is some use of their courts. Almost all responding schools

however suggest that their tennis courts are underused outside of curricular hours and schools

therefore represent a significant opportunity for tennis development.

Club Membership

6.36 There are three tennis clubs within Hinckley and Bosworth. Given the size of the borough

population, this represents strong foundations for the development of tennis.

6.37 Analysis of club membership gives an indication of demand for more formal forms of the game.

Existing clubs and their membership trends are therefore summarised in Table 6.5. It is clear that

membership within clubs is fairly static, although investment into floodlights at Hinckley Tennis

Club has had significant impact and seen this club generate increases in membership.

6.38 There are a few consistent trends common to all clubs, with the key barriers to growth raised as;

Facility restrictions - site capacity and court quality


Pressures on coaches / volunteers

Funding issues

A lack of public facilities supporting grass roots tennis.

6.39 LTA insight (2014) demonstrates that 1 in 4 current players would consider joining a club but

standard of play, year-round tennis and associated fees are off-putting.

6.40 While this may be the case, the lack of public courts in Hinckley and Bosworth, as well as the

limited practical use of courts on school sites means that participation on club sites is of significant

importance in the local tennis scene.

Table 6.4: Tennis clubs in Hinckley and Bosworth

Club Name Activities Available Membership

Numbers

Participation

Trends

Comments on Participation and

Perceived Issues

Hinckley

Tennis Club

Competitive Play

(club ran 22 adult

and 24 junior teams

in last years LTA

leagues), 2/3

sessions a week of

social play, full

coaching

programme, mini

tennis, tots tennis,

cardio tennis (2

sessions per week),

weekly touch tennis,

coaching for the

disabled (one

session a week).

Club also worked on

a free of charge

basis to go into

special needs

school.

188 total

active playing

members (103

senior, 85

junior). 6 non

playing

members.

Increased

Club seeking to reach 250 members

by end of 2017. Club has seen

significant increase since installation

of floodlights, which increased court

time available. Club has also recently

won Leicestershire Wide awards,

which has attracted players and the

club have a well-respected coach

which has led to increases in club

membership.

Club do not have issues attracting

members but have aspirations to

expand the club which would mean

relocation (due to lack of on site

opportunities). Club currently

struggling for capacity on existing

site.

Club believe that dearth of facilities

within Hinckley impacts tennis

development - club hire secondary

venue at Redmoor Academy to

service all of their matches and

provide more social tennis.

Key issues identified as amount of

club courts and amount of public

courts. Club also believe that public

courts are expensive to hire.

Market

Bosworth

Tennis Club

Competitive play,

casual play, daily

junior coaching and

twice per week

adult coaching, 3 x

191 total

active playing

members (86

senior, 80

junior). 13

Static

Club highlight rural location as key

barrier to recruitment - there is a low

density of local players. Would like to

invest in access system to allow more

pay and play access to entice new


Club Name Activities Available Membership

Numbers

Participation

Trends

Comments on Participation and

Perceived Issues

mini coaching per

week and cardio

tennis 1 per week.

Club also run fun

social tournaments.

non-playing

members.

members. Shortage of volunteers

and coaches also impacts

development and club has capacity

for more members.

Sport in

Desford

Competitive play,

casual play,

coaching, mini

tennis from age 4

and cardio tennis.

Club also runs

inclusive tennis

programme.

126 total

active playing

members (60

senior, 66

junior).

Static

Club believe that court quality and

cost of travelling to compete, as well

as internal / external funding impact

upon club development.

Club prioritise improvements to their

courts to ensure that participation is

sustained.

NGB priorities and Intelligence

British Tennis Strategic Plan 2015 - 2018

6.41 The mission of the LTA Strategic Plan is to get more people playing tennis more often. Linking with

the three types of facilities that are found, this will be delivered through three strands;

Delivering service to clubs, including providing support for clubs of all sizes by sharing best

practice learning, applying focus on clubs seeking to grow the game and their community

and helping clubs to achieve management excellence

Participation focus - building partnerships in the community through the deliver y of strong

local parks and community tennis venues to deliver inclusive access, investment in people

delivering strong experiences in parks and targeted investment in welcoming park facilities

for people to socialise and play

Enhancing the tennis offer in education, including strengthening the schools offer while

introducing a new secondary school programme, providing support to develop more

effective links between schools and other places where tennis is played and maximising

playing opportunities to help build a future workforce in colleges and universities.

6.42 Strategic Whole Sport Plan facilities investment will support and facilitate the delivery of the above

programmes. It will be largely focused in the priority areas to address gaps or improve provision

where critical to park or community programmes. Hinckley and Bosworth are not identified as a

priority area, although nearby Leicester City is a key priority, which may have a knock-on impact on

demand for tennis across Leicestershire as a whole.

6.43 Building on this, The LTA have recently launched a new investment initiative called ‘Transforming

British Tennis Together’. The aim of this ten-year initiative is to make tennis more accessible and

more useable and to ensure that rain and darkness no longer inhibit play.

6.44 To deliver this, the LTA has committed to investing £125 million to improve community tennis

facilities across the country and it is hoped that this will help bring tennis to a wider audience and

overcome key barriers. The LTA notes that currently, over a third of possible playing hours are lost

nationally due to rain (only 7% of Britain’s 23,000 courts are covered), whilst only 1 in 7 park courts

have floodlights.


6.45 With key partners, the LTA therefore seeks to;

increase the number of covered and floodlit courts by 50% to boost available playing hours

when it’s raining and when the sun has gone down;

use technological solutions to enhance the tennis experience, such as installing online

booking and entry systems so everyone can book a tennis court easily from their mobile

phone, computer or tablet; and enhancing gate access;

refurbish courts, clubhouses and other social spaces to ensure players have a great

experience every time they visit; and

support other innovative and creative ideas that meet local demand.

6.46 Ensuring the sustainability of community tennis provision remains a key focus for the LTA and the

NGB has set out suggested sinking fund guidelines for clubs and Local Authorities to work towards,

to ensure that quality tennis provision can be maintained for future generations.

6.47 Informing potential areas for growth, LTA national insight work demonstrates that the greatest

opportunity for additional growth is amongst 20 - 39 year olds and 40 - 49 year olds. This means

that both park courts and club based facilities will be important in driving this participation. It also

demonstrated that infrequent park players need and want a range of things to play more often and

identify key barriers specifically;

the existing profile of tennis players is restricted - players are more likely to be male

(particularly aged 14 - 39) and in the ABC1 demographic. Not having someone to play with is

identified as a key barrier (27%);

the poor quality of facilities;

the need to effectively market and promote opportunities for tennis, including a centralised

court booking process; and

a lack of online presence.

6.48 It also reveals that men may like group based coaching and fun tournaments, while women enjoy

turn up and play formats with a facilitator.

6.49 This assessment has demonstrated that many of the above issues exist in the borough and

therefore despite the presence of three strong clubs, there is scope to significantly improve the

tennis offering across Hinckley and Bosworth.

Adequacy of provision

6.50 As outlined earlier in this section, Sport England Active People surveys reveal that across the

borough, 1957 people currently participate in tennis however a further 2081 people would like to

play. This suggests that there is an overall potential tennis playing population of 4038. This is

significantly higher than current levels of club membership (505).

6.51 LTA research demonstrates that circa 40 – 50% of play takes place at community venues. Estimated

use at public venues and school sites (253 uses of the courts at Hollycroft Park plus only a small

amount of usage at school sites that isn’t affiliated to the clubs) compared to 505 club members

suggests that the Active People surveys represent perhaps the maximum possible levels of current

demand. It also suggests that there is particular scope to increase the amount of play that is not

affiliated to a club base.


6.52 LTA viability modelling assumes that 3% of the population would look to play tennis each month.

In Hinckley and Bosworth, this represents 3296 people, a figure lower than the potential figure

calculated using the Active People / Market Segmentation research, but still higher than is likely

based on known participation records.

6.53 Using existing levels of participation within clubs and assuming that 50% of participants play

casually to determine a more realistic baseline position of participation, total participation would

equate to 1010 people. This represents 0.9% of the population, which is significantly below target

levels.

6.54 The existing and potential participation can be used to calculate the adequacy of existing facilities

and the amount of facilities required. Although there are no formal standards for the number of

tennis courts needed in an area, the LTA have derived a means of analysing demand for tennis and

determining when facilities are at or approaching capacity. Parameters used (LTA 2017) are as

follows;

40 members per non floodlit, outdoor court

60 members per floodlit outdoor court

200 members per indoor tennis court.

6.55 These figures can be used to determine an adequacy of provision as follows;

based upon an assumed standard of 1 court per 40 participants (not floodlit) and 1 court per

60 players (floodlit), the existing stock of active outdoor courts that are available for

community use will serve 2480 players. According to Active People, there are 1907 existing

players meaning that the stock of facilities is above the level required; but

if latent demand (according to Active People) was realised, provision would fall below the

levels required. Given that the existing facilities could serve 2480 players, a total playing

population of 4038 people would theoretically require an additional 39 courts (depending

upon the provision of floodlights this may reduce slightly); and

a similar picture is presented using the LTA viability modelling, which places participation at

3% of the population (3296 people). The stock of facilities would be insufficient to meet

target levels of participation (an additional 28 courts required).

6.56 LTA insight however demonstrates that club members generally play more frequently than those

using park courts and it is therefore possible to adjust the number of people that park courts serve

from 40 to 80 people (non floodlit) and to 120 (floodlit).

6.57 With 4 public courts in Hinckley and Bosworth, this would increase the amount of players that the

existing stock of facilities serves to 2640 and reduce the additional number of courts needed to 35.

This remains however a significant amount of additional provision, particularly as there is evidence

to suggest that existing courts are not used to their full potential.

6.58 It is clear therefore that while there are insufficient courts within Hinckley and Bosworth to

accommodate target levels of participation (3% of the population) there is scope to increase the

use of existing facilities before new courts are required.

6.59 There is a good distribution of facilities across the borough, particularly when taking into account

school sites, with courts in the northern parishes as well as in the urban area.


Capacity of Club Bases

6.60 The capacity of the club bases can also be accurately measured using the LTA parameters – this is

set out in Table 6.5. It reveals that the three current clubs have capacity for 780 players and current

membership equates to 505. This means that there is scope to accommodate at least 275 further

members. While this suggests that further courts are not required to meet club need overall, this

does disguise other issues relating to the club base, including the minimal spare capacity at

Hinckley Tennis Club and minor quality issues that need to be addressed

Table 6.5: Capacity of each club

Club Membership

Numbers

Number

of

Courts

Number

of

Floodlit

Courts

Total

Capacity

Spare

Capacity Comment

Hinckley

Tennis

Club

188 4 4 240 52

Limited remaining capacity and no

scope for expansion. Club currently

targeting 250 members by the end of

2017 meaning that they would be over

capacity for size of club base.

There is no capacity within the

confines of the existing site for the

development of further courts and

club are therefore seeking relocation

to enable aspirations for additional

provision (and therefore growth in

participation) to be achieved.

Market

Bosworth

Tennis

Club

191 6 6 360 169

Scope for further membership and

club are keen to engage with new

players.

Club seeking to introduce pay and

play access systems to increase use of

facilities and to develop tennis at a

grass roots level

Sport in

Desford 126 3 3 180 54

Scope for further membership and

club are keen to engage with new

players.

Club prioritising quality improvements

to existing courts. Sport in Desford

also in discussion with LTA about

creation of two further multi use

floodlit courts.

6.61 Modelling and wider consultation work therefore indicates that;


the stock of existing facilities in numerical terms is broadly sufficient to meet current demand

based on existing club membership and assumed pay and play statistics but is more closely

matched with demand if the Active People Survey results are used. If these figures are

applied, it is clear that further provision is needed to supplement the existing facilities; and

building on this, if latent demand was realised, the existing stock of facilities that is

accessible to the community is insufficient. The number of players per court would be too

high and there would be a need to create additional courts (or negotiate access to courts

that are not currently available for community use.

6.62 Baseline modelling however disguises many of the issues identified through site visit and

consultation work, which reveal that existing infrastructure for tennis is not fit for purpose, and that

participation will be constrained unless issues are addressed, specifically;

there are site specific issues at two of the three tennis clubs, with Hinckley Tennis Club in

particular approaching the point at which capacity may inhibit club growth;

there is a dearth of public sites, with Hollycroft Park (Hinckley) providing the only good

quality public facility, as other public facilities have fallen into disrepair. This means that there

are few opportunities for grass roots tennis;

there is a lack of use of school sites (although they are available) many of which are of

adequate quality and provide associated facilities such as toilets;

there is limited awareness of the location of existing courts and promotion of opportunities

is restricted.

6.63 While at face value this suggests that further public facilities are required, it is essential that any

network of facilities is sustainable. In a primarily rural district such as Hinckley and Bosworth (and

with the main urban area of Hinckley and Burbage served with a tennis club, accessible school sites

and a recently refurbished park site) other solutions may be required to meet the needs of

residents in outlying areas. This may include maximising the role that clubs can play in grass roots

development (including pay and play access to sites) and enhanced marketing and promotion of

school facilities.

Impact of population growth

6.64 The wider range of participants in tennis means that population growth may have a greater impact

than for other sports. Using LTA parameters that up to 3% of the population may play tennis, the

projected increase of 12977 people between 2017 and 2036 will generate a further 389 tennis

players. When added to the assumed levels of current participation based on LTA viability

modelling (3% of the population playing tennis) it is indicated that existing levels of provision

would be unable to accommodate future growth.

6.65 Using existing levels of participation within clubs and assuming that 50% of participants play

casually to determine a more realistic baseline position of participation, total participation would

equate to 1010 people. This represents 0.9% of the population.

6.66 Assuming that participation remains constant at this level and applying this to future growth

forecasts, there would be an increase in demand of up to 129 people by 2036. This population

growth would generate a requirement for an additional 3 courts (non floodlit) or 2 (floodlit) and

could easily be accommodated within the existing infrastructure, assuming that significant

increases in participation over and above estimated levels do not occur.



6.67 The key issues for tennis are summarised below.

Key issues – Tennis

Good distribution of sites, but quality poor at public courts (excluding Hinckley Hollycroft Park).

There is good availability at school sites and quality is standard, but there is limited promotion and

a general lack of awareness of facilities that are available.

Maintenance at all sites is limited and there are few courts where sinking funds are in place. Quality

issues (in particular line markings and poor playing surfaces) are identified at several sites.

Although club membership is static, clubs believe that this is impacted by facility restrictions (site

capacity and court quality) as well as pressures on volunteers, funding issues and a lack of public

facilities supporting grass roots tennis.

Modelling based on actual participation demonstrates that there are sufficient facilities and scope

to increase usage (particularly schools and public venues) significantly. Viability modelling indicates

that more facilities may be required but the LTA highlight the need to maximise the use of the

existing network and to ensure that the facility stock is sustainable moving forwards.

There is limited capacity at Hinckley Tennis Club but scope to reinvigorate participation at Desford

and Market Bosworth. There is potential for clubs to play a much wider role in increasing

participation.

Low levels of participation compared to modelling estimates suggests that there are significant

opportunities for marketing and promotion.

7: Golf


Introduction

7.1 A study using the ANOG framework is required to advise the local planning authority in Hinckley &

Bosworth about the future need for golf facilities as part of the ongoing local plan preparation

process and the Playing Pitch Strategy.

7.2 In line with the ANOG methodology this should comprise the following elements:

Quantity – what facilities there are in the area, and how many there are. It is also necessary

to look at different catchments to assess the quantity in a more segmented way e.g. ratio of

‘pay and play’ courses as opposed to all courses. Relative supply can be assessed but this

should not be adopted as a proxy for need and demand.

Quality – how good they are, to include perceptions from users (where available on websites

etc.), an age proxy from APP and any accreditation by CGU. An assessment of fitness for

purpose could also be made, but this is subject to the same constraints as above.

Accessibility – where they are located. This will include catchment areas and demonstrate

whether there are sufficient courses in the area.

Availability – how available they are. The audit work may show, for example, there is plenty

of spare capacity in the surrounding courses and no lack of availability for traditional 18-hole

golf but less availability for those looking to start and take-up the game.

Supply

7.3 The supply of golf courses is based on Active Places Power data, supplemented by website and

other checks. It is accepted that that the APP database may exclude some facilities, but further

research suggests that no further courses have been identified in the immediate area, although lack

of local knowledge and time precludes any other amendments over the wider area considered.

Quantity

7.4 The following golf facilities are identified in APP within Hinckley & Bosworth borough. The

description of access type is considered inconsistent (in line with all golf data in APP), as some

courses are described as pay and play when they are clearly members’ courses where visitors are

permitted/encouraged on payment of a green fee. A more accurate description of accessibility to

courses is set out later, based on additional information on local courses, but the APP

categorization has to be used if a comparison with provision in other wider areas is to be

undertaken (see overleaf).


Map 7.1: Location of golf facilities in Hinckley & Bosworth

Table 7.1: Golf Courses in Hinckley and Bosworth

Site Name Facility

sub type

Holes/bays Length m Access Ownership/

management

Year Built

FOREST HILL

GOLF &

CONFERENCE

CENTRE Standard 18 5934.46 Pay and Play Commercial 1991

HINCKLEY GOLF

CLUB LTD Standard 18 5920.74 Pay and Play Commercial 1894

Total 2 courses 36

FOREST HILL

GOLF &

CONFERENCE

CENTRE

Driving

Range 26 228.6 Pay and Play Commercial 1991

Total 1 range 26

7.5 There are no par 3 courses in Hinckley & Bosworth.


7.6 Within a wider area around the borough there are a number of other golf facilities as follows.

Table 7.2: Standard golf courses

Site Name Range

(in mins)

Holes Length

m

Access Ownership/

management

Year

Built/

refurb

Local

Authority

HINCKLEY GOLF CLUB

LTD 2.5-5 18 5920.74 Pay and Play Commercial 1894

Hinckley and

Bosworth

BRAMCOTE WATER

GOLF COURSE 5-10 9 2333.55 Pay and Play Commercial 1995 Rugby

ANSTY GOLF CLUB 10-15 18 5558.64 Pay and Play Commercial 1990 Rugby

NUNEATON GOLF

CLUB 10-15 18 5757.98

Registered

Membership use Sports Club

1905/

2015

Nuneaton and

Bedworth

ULLESTHORPE COURT

HOTEL & GOLF CLUB 10-15 18 6091.73 Pay and Play Commercial 1976 Harborough

ATHERSTONE GOLF

CLUB 15-20 18 5502.86 Pay and Play Sports Club 1894

North

Warwickshire

BLABY GOLF CLUB 15-20 9 2300.63 Pay and Play Sports Club 1990 Blaby

COPSEWOOD

GRANGE GOLF CLUB 15-20 9 5530.29 Pay and Play Sports Club 1920 Coventry

COSBY GOLF CLUB 15-20 18 5919.83 Pay and Play Sports Club 1895 Blaby

ENDERBY LEISURE

AND GOLF CENTRE 15-20 9 2651.76 Pay and Play

Local

Authority/com

mercial 1984 Blaby

KIRBY MUXLOE GOLF

CLUB 15-20 18 5737.86 Pay and Play

Sports Club/

commercial 1893 Blaby

LUTTERWORTH GOLF

CLUB 15-20 18 5708.6

Sports Club /

Community

Association Sports Club 1904 Harborough

WHETSTONE GOLF

CLUB 15-20 18 5652.82 Pay and Play Sports Club 1960 Blaby

Total 0-20

13

courses 198

7.7 There are 13 standard courses within a 20-minute driving catchment of the main built up area of

Hinckley, comprising 198 holes. The more local 10-minute catchment includes one course in H & B

plus one in neighbouring Rugby.

Table 7.3: Par 3 courses

Site Name Range (in

mins)

Holes Length

m

Access Ownership/

management

Year

Built/

refurb

Local

Authority

ANSTY GOLF CLUB 10-15 9 868.68

Pay and

Play Commercial 1990 Rugby

THE LUKE MELLING

GOLF ACADEMY 15-20 9 997

Pay and

Play Commercial 1990

Nuneaton

and

Bedworth

Total 2 courses 18


7.8 There are two par 3 courses within the 20-minute catchment, both outside the borough and on the

outer edge of the 20-minute drive.

Table 7.4: Golf Driving Ranges

Site Name Range (in

mins)

Bays Floodli

t

Access Ownership/

management

Year

Built

Local

Authority

ANSTY GOLF CLUB 10-15 18 No

Pay and


BRAMCOTE DRIVING

RANGE 10-15 26 Yes

Pay and


COSBY GOLF CLUB 15-20 10 Yes

Pay and

Play Sports Club 2009 Blaby

THE LUKE MELLING GOLF

ACADEMY 15-20 30 Yes

Pay and


Nuneaton

and

Bedworth

WHETSTONE GOLF CLUB 15-20 30 No

Pay and

Play Sports Club 1960 Blaby

Total 0-20 5 ranges 114

7.9 There are 5 GDRs within a 20-minute driving catchment of Hinckley, comprising 114 bays. Three of

these are floodlit, comprising 66 bays in total. The more local 10-minute catchment includes just

one range with 24 floodlit bays. All of these are outside the borough (it is an apparent anomaly

that the GDR within the borough at Forest Hill G & CC is actually more than 20 minutes drive from

the middle of Hinckley which forms the basis of the catchment assessment).

7.10 APP describes most of these facilities as pay and play facilities. As suggested above, it is assumed

that most/all of the standard golf courses also allow some casual play on payment of a visitors’

green fee. However, some courses are still run as members’ clubs and in reality fewer

clubs/courses than suggested in the table are fully pay and play - i.e. do offer facilities that are

always available to full community access at all times on demand. A fuller description of the local

facilities within H & B borough is set out below, as a means of identifying the roles that all facilities

play in meeting demand in the area for golf:

Forest Hill G & CC is situated in The National Forest, and part of the woodland planted around the

golf course was created under the Changing Landscape Scheme, funded by the National Forest

Company. The course is a commercial members facility, with the opportunity to pay and play. The

course opened for play in 1991 but was extended to its current layout during 2006. The course now

extends to 6,513 yards (par 73). Full membership costs £699 pa, and there is no joining fee. The

club has vacancies for new members, and membership currently stands at 540. The facility also

includes a golf academy and junior academy. Green fees are £20 during the week and £25 at

weekends. A GDR is mainly available on a pay and play basis

Hinckley GC is a well-established private members club, originally founded in 1894 and brought

up to its current layout in 1983. The par 71, 18-hole parkland golf course extends to 6696 yards,

and there are 5 sets of tee blocks, which provide an excellent golfing challenge for all handicaps of

golfer. The course is laid out on part-lakeland/parkland, meaning water hazards are a particular

feature of the course design. With Hinckley being dry and playable during most of the winter

period, the course is rarely closed. Full membership of the club costs £1056 pa and there is

currently a joining fee of £350. The website suggests there are only limited spaces available for

new members. Green fees are available for £35 at present. The club and course have recently


hosted many prestigious events such as the Midlands Closed Amateur Tournament and the

Leicestershire Ladies County Championships.

Categorisation of courses

7.11 The existing courses/facilities in the H&B area can be categorised as follows, to highlight their main

function and usage/availability (there may be some overlap between some categories):

Course Type Courses in Hinckley and Bosworth

Well established (old style) clubs where the main

use is by members but with green fees available

for visitors

Hinckley GC

Proprietary/commercial courses (i.e. newer

courses), including hotel resorts, where

membership is available, but casual/pay and play

access through payment of green fees are

equally acceptable

Forest Hill G & CC

Public/municipal pay and play courses

None

Starter clubs, with shorter courses, academy

courses, practice facilities, flexible and low cost

membership and beginner friendly culture

None

Pitch and putt/par 3 and 9-hole facilities, ideal

for beginner and social golf

None

Free standing Golf Driving Ranges, valuable for

practice, coaching and teaching and for golfers

without the time to play a full round, and

supplementing GDRs at other golf

centres/courses

None

FACILITIES IN THE WIDER CATCHMENT

7.12 In addition to courses within Hinckley & Bosworth and the local area, there are a large number of

other golf facilities in a wider ring, which are likely to offer opportunities for local H&B residents to

play golf in its various forms. The table below includes all facilities within a 20-30 minute driving

catchment of the middle of Hinckley built up area.


Table 7.5: Standard courses

Site Name Range (in

mins)

Holes Length

m

Access Ownership/

management

Year

Built

Local Authority

CITY OF COVENTRY

BRANDON WOOD

GOLF COURSE

20-25 18 5942.69 Pay and Play Local

Authority/Trus

t

1977 Rugby

COVENTRY GOLF

CLUB

20-25 18 6025.9 Sports Club /

Community

Association

Sports Club 1887 Warwick

COVENTRY HEARSALL

GOLF CLUB

20-25 18 5853.07 Sports Club /

Community

Association

Sports Club 1909 Coventry

FOREST HILL GOLF &

CONFERENCE

CENTRE

20-25 18 5934.46 Pay and Play Commercial 1991 Hinckley and

Bosworth

KILWORTH SPRINGS

GOLF CLUB

20-25 18 5934.46 Pay and Play Sports Club 1993 Harborough

OAKRIDGE GOLF

CLUB

20-25 18 5676.6 Pay and Play Commercial 1992 North Warwickshire

RUGBY GOLF CLUB 20-25 18 5133.44 Pay and Play Commercial 1891 Rugby

STONELEIGH DEER

PARK GOLF CLUB

20-25 18 5537.61 Pay and Play Sports Club 1993 Warwick

WHITEFIELDS GOLF

CLUB AND

DRAYCOTE HOTEL

20-25 18 5750.66 Pay and Play Commercial 1992 Rugby

BEEDLES LAKE GOLF

CENTRE

25-30 18 6072.53 Pay and Play Commercial 1993 Charnwood

BILTON GRANGE

SCHOOL

25-30 9 800 Sports Club /

Community

Association

Other

Independent

School/Trust

1985 Rugby

BIRSTALL GOLF CLUB 25-30 18 5698.54 Registered

Membership use

Sports Club 1901 Leicester

DRAYTON PARK

GOLF CLUB

25-30 18 5919.83 Pay and Play Sports Club 1897 Lichfield

GLEN GORSE GOLF

CLUB

25-30 18 6078.93 Pay and Play Sports Club 1933 Oadby and Wigston

HERMITAGE LEISURE

CENTRE

25-30 9 1696.21 Pay and Play Local Authority 1967 North West

Leicestershire

HUMBERSTONE

HEIGHTS GOLF CLUB

25-30 18 5683.91 Pay and Play Local Authority 1977 Leicester

LEA MARSTON HOTEL

& LEISURE COMPLEX


LEICESTERSHIRE GOLF

CLUB

25-30 18 5787.24 Pay and Play Sports Club 1890 Leicester

LINGDALE GOLF CLUB 25-30 18 5908.85 Pay and Play Sports Club 1967 Charnwood

LONGCLIFFE GOLF

CLUB

25-30 18 6057.9 Registered

Membership use

Sports Club 1906 Charnwood

MARRIOTT LEISURE &

COUNTRY CLUB

(FOREST OF ARDEN)


MARRIOTT LEISURE &

COUNTRY CLUB



Site Name Range (in

mins)

Holes Length

m

Access Ownership/

management

Year

Built

Local Authority

(FOREST OF ARDEN)

MAXSTOKE PARK

GOLF CLUB

25-30 18 5868.62 Pay and Play Sports Club 1945 North Warwickshire

NORTH

WARWICKSHIRE

GOLF CLUB LTD

25-30 9 2914.19 Pay and Play Commercial 1894 Solihull

ROTHLEY PARK GOLF

CLUB

25-30 18 5944.51 Sports Club /

Community

Association

Sports Club 1912 Charnwood

STONEBRIDGE GOLF

CENTRE


STONEBRIDGE GOLF

CENTRE


THE BELFRY CLUB 25-30 18 6148.43 Registered

Membership use

Commercial 1997 North Warwickshire


Membership use



Membership use


THE WARWICKSHIRE

GOLF AND COUNTRY

CLUB

25-30 18 6237.12 Pay and Play Commercial 1994 Warwick

THE WARWICKSHIRE

GOLF AND COUNTRY

CLUB

25-30 18 6499.56 Pay and Play Commercial 1994 Warwick

WINDMILL VILLAGE

HOTEL AND GOLF

CLUB

25-30 18 4740.25 Pay and Play Commercial 1990 Coventry

Total 20-30 33 courses 549

7.13 There are a large number of standard courses within a 20-30 minute driving catchment of

Channels, comprising 33 courses and 549 holes. 24 of these are at the outer limit of this catchment

(i.e. over 25 minutes).


Site Name Range

(in

mins)

Holes Length

m

Access Ownership/

management

Year

Built

Local

Authority

STONELEIGH DEER

PARK GOLF CLUB 20-25 9 1143.91

Pay and

Play Sports Club 1993 Warwick

ALLESLEY HALL GOLF

COURSE 25-30 18 1828.8

Pay and

Play

Local Authority/in

house 1984 Coventry

BEEDLES LAKE GOLF

CENTRE 25-30 9 3411

Pay and

Play Commercial n/a Charnwood

HUMBERSTONE

HEIGHTS GOLF CLUB 25-30 9 576.07

Pay and

Play

Local Authority/in

house n/a Leicester

LEA MARSTON HOTEL

& LEISURE COMPLEX 25-30 9 708.66

Pay and


North

Warwickshire

THE WARWICKSHIRE

GOLF AND COUNTRY 25-30 9 2578.61

Pay and

Play Commercial 1994 Warwick


7.14 There are six par 3 courses with 63 holes within a 20-30 minute catchment, 5 of which are at the

outer extremity of this catchment.

Table 7.7: Golf Driving Ranges

Site Name Range

(in mins)

Bays Floodlit Access Ownership/

management

Year

Built

Local

Authority

CITY OF COVENTRY

BRANDON WOOD

GOLF COURSE 20-25 11 Yes Pay and Play Local Authority/Trust 1977 Rugby

FOREST HILL GOLF &

CONFERENCE

CENTRE 20-25 26 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 1991

Hinckley and

Bosworth

JOHN REAY GOLF

CENTRE 20-25 30 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 1974 Coventry

KILWORTH SPRINGS

GOLF CLUB 20-25 20 Yes Pay and Play Sports Club 1993 Harborough

WHITEFIELDS GOLF

CLUB AND

DRAYCOTE HOTEL 20-25 16 No Pay and Play Commercial 1992 Rugby

BEEDLES LAKE GOLF

CENTRE 25-30 17 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 1995 Charnwood

GLEN GORSE GOLF

CLUB 25-30 8 No

Sports Club /

Community

Association Sports Club n/a

Oadby and

Wigston

HUMBERSTONE

HEIGHTS GOLF CLUB 25-30 30 Yes Pay and Play

Local Authority/in

house 1999 Leicester

LEA MARSTON

HOTEL & LEISURE

COMPLEX 25-30 25 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 1990

North

Warwickshire

MARRIOTT LEISURE

& COUNTRY CLUB

(FOREST OF ARDEN) 25-30 16 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 2002

North

Warwickshire

STONEBRIDGE GOLF

CENTRE 25-30 21 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 1996

North

Warwickshire

THE BELFRY CLUB 25-30 34 Yes

Registered

Membership

use Commercial 1975

North

Warwickshire

THE GOLF CENTRE 25-30 24 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 1994

North West

Leicestershire

THE WARWICKSHIRE

GOLF AND COUNTRY

CLUB 25-30 26 Yes Pay and Play Commercial 1994 Warwick

Total 20-30

14

ranges 304

7.15 There are 14 GDRs within a 20-30 minute driving catchment of Hinckley, comprising 304 bays. All

but two of these ranges are floodlit, comprising 280 bays in total. Most of these are at the outer

CLUB

Total 20-30

6

courses 63


limit of this catchment.

Map 7.2: Location of golf facilities around Hinckley & Bosworth

Closed courses

7.16 Kyngs Golf Course and County Club, Market Bosworth, has recently closed. There has been a recent

planning application for the site, but it was refused. This is not included in the current supply and

demand. Forest Hill is also under potential threat for an alternative use at the time of this

assessment. Any loss would reduce further the supply and demand balance and mean there would

be no GDRs in Hinckley and Bosworth.

Summary of existing facility provision

7.17 In summary, the supply of golf facilities in the wider area within Hinckley & Bosworth and a 30-

minute drive of Hinckley is as set out overleaf in Table 7.8.


Table 7.8: Supply of Golf Courses within 30 Minute Drivetime of Hinckley

Catchment Standard

Courses

Holes Par 3

courses

Holes GDRs Bays

Facilities within Hinckley &

Bosworth

2 36 0 0 1 26

Facilities 0-20 minutes 13 198 2 18 5 114

Facilities 20-30 minutes 33 549 6 63 14 304

Total 0-30 minutes (incl

Hinckley & Bosworth)

46 747 8 81 19 418

Relative Supply

7.18 Relative provision of golf facilities in the local and wider area, regionally and nationally is set out

below - these figures are produced manually and they include all operational courses, available for

some community use (i.e. not private) included in the APP database. It should be emphasised that

this assessment only comprises existing supply; relative provision of courses is a useful indicator of

how well an area is doing for facilities in comparison with other areas, but is only a benchmark

against which to judge supply. This section makes no comments at this stage on the local (or

wider) demand for golf, which is dealt with below.

All standard courses

7.19 This first assessment below is given as context to allow comparison of the main golf courses in the

area. The catchments refer to travel time by car from the middle of Hinckley built up area.

Table 7.9: Comparison of Golf Provision in Hinckley and Bosworth with other areas

Courses Holes Population 2015 Holes per 1000

population

Hinckley & Bosworth 2 36 107,938 0.33

Blaby 5 72 95,948 0.75

Charnwood 6 99 174,880 0.57

N W Leicestershire 2 27 95,197 0.28

North Warwickshire 11 180 62,652 2.87

Nuneaton and Bedworth 1 18 127,662 0.14

Rugby 6 90 103,182 0.87

Leics & Rutland CSP area 34 567 1,044,247

0.54

Within 20 minute drive 13 198 497615 0.40


East Midlands region 182 2943 4652096 0.63

England 2022 31835 54,669,203 0.58


7.20 Local relative provision for all standard courses in H&B is very low (only about half) compared with

the CSP, regional and national average. Only N W Leicestershire and Nuneaton and Bedworth of

neighbouring LAs are worse provided with standard courses in the surrounding area.

7.21 Provision of standard courses within a reasonable (20 minute driving) catchment of Hinckley is still

low compared with average, although the wider catchment within 30 minutes is much better

supplied and is about average for the region and England. However, many of these standard

courses are at the outer edge of the 30 minute catchment, and could be considered normally

outside a reasonable travel time to a course for most people.


7.22 Local provision for par 3 courses (which are suitable for recreational play, teaching and practice) in

H&B and two of the adjacent districts is non-existent, but the 20 and 30 minute catchments are

relatively well provided to at least the national average.

Table 7.11: GDRs

Courses Holes Population 2015 Holes per 1000

population

Hinckley & Bosworth 0 0 107,938 0

Blaby 0 0 95,948 0

Charnwood 2 18 174,880 0.10

N W Leicestershire 0 0 95,197 0



Rugby 2 18 103,182 0.17

Leics & Rutland CSP area 7 69 1,044,247 0.07




England 237 2406 54,669,203 0.04

Ranges Bays Population 2015 Bays per 1000

population

Hinckley & Bosworth 1 26 107,938 0.24


7.23 The provision of GDRs in H&B, and generally in the area (including the 20 and 30 minute

catchments) is good, and is around the county, regional and national average, although in fact the

H&B ratio is among the lowest in the study area.

QUALITY

7.24 When assessing quality, it is necessary to review both condition and fitness for purpose.

7.25 APP data on age/refurb can be used to inform quality, but in the case of golf this is not a valid

proxy and in any case details of refurbishment of golf courses is either not collected or not

considered relevant. It would be useful to highlight course conditions across the study area, and

also at other similar facilities in the local catchment to ascertain whether there is a quality issue

overall. It has not been possible to undertake site surveys of any course, and in any case it would

be unlikely that course owners would permit access on site, and there is no acknowledged

methodology for doing this.

7.26 Accreditation by CGU would be useful in informing the quality criterion, but this may not be

available.

7.27 The general feeling is that because of the nature of golf, the predominance of clubs in managing

their own facilities, and the demands of users, most courses are of acceptable or high quality or in

good condition.

7.28 In terms of fitness for purpose, it may be necessary to look at quality from a wider perspective and

consider the need for (say) good quality entry-level golf in line with strategic priorities of the NGB

and the needs in the catchment. The aspirations of beginners to the game will be different from

those who have played golf at a members’ club for years. In this way quality would be linked to

purpose, and the criteria would differ between golf course needs of different types. This

information is also not currently available.

Accessibility

7.29 Given the amount and distribution of various types of facilities, all residents within H&B and the

wider study area have access by car to a choice of a number of golf facilities to use. However, the

Blaby 2 40 95,948 0.42

Charnwood 3 57 174,880 0.33

N W Leicestershire 1 24 95,197 0.25



Rugby 5 95 103,182 0.92

Leics & Rutland CSP area 16 295 1,044,247 0.28




England 621 11841 54,669,203 0.22


low relative supply, particularly of standard and par 3 courses, means that choice is not as wide as

in many other areas.

Availability

7.30 Availability needs to consider the following (see ANOG):

how much existing courses are actually used, how full they are;

how much they could be used; and

what scope there is for increasing their availability.

7.31 These are in turn influenced by a number of factors, including:

the management and ownership e.g. whether facilities are public, private or education based;

a programming and sports development policy e.g. is availability given over to specific

sports, initiatives and range of activities at certain times. Some facilities may be programmed

only for specific sports, users or activities;

the cost of use e.g. a high cost may result in a facility having very little use;

patterns of use e.g. a popular facility that is always full, a facility that is heavily used but only

for a limited period across the week, is the nature of use changing over time?

hours of use e.g. opening times available for public use, this will be linked to the

programming policies above; and

facility design e.g. the physical design and layout of a facility may limit or prevent use by

specific users.

7.32 Because site operators would not necessarily divulge this information in detail, it has not been

possible to ascertain the precise availability of all courses in the area in any great detail. There is

relatively low supply of standard courses in H&B and the immediate 20-minute catchment, though

slightly higher further afield. There are some vacancies at the private club in H&B, but this this club

operates a current joining fee. The pay and play course appears to welcome additional golfers, and

there is no evidence of over use. This indicates that demand and supply within H&B itself may be

broadly in balance. It may well be that there is a problem of accommodating usage at peak times

at weekends as is often the case, but this was not researched in detail.

7.33 There is certainly a problem accessing par 3 courses in the local area, where the relative supply is

low or non-existent, but GDRs are relatively plentiful, and probably adequate to meet current

demand.

Overview of Supply

7.34 There is a limited range of golf facilities in H&B, comprising two standard courses (one members’

and one commercial pay and play), but no par 3 courses and only one GDR located at an existing

club, though available on a pay and play basis. There is a greater number of standard courses and

free-standing GDRs in the wider catchment, but relatively few par 3 courses.

7.35 Relative supply is a useful indicator in terms of benchmarking local provision alongside other


similar areas. Standard golf course provision in H&B and within a 20-minute catchment is low

when compared with the region or England, but higher over the wider 30-minute catchment,

although some of these courses may be too distant to serve H&B residents. Evidence from the two

local golf clubs suggest that there may be adequate opportunities for pay and play golf, but that

membership vacancies at the private club may be limited, as new members are required to pay a

joining fee. In addition, it is likely that at peak times both courses are well used. Overall it is likely

that there is a broad balance between existing supply and demand in the borough, and that the

standard courses over the 20-minute catchment have to absorb local demand including from H&B.

7.36 There is a distinct lack of conventional ‘municipal’ courses originally established by local authorities

or now managed by contractors or a local trust within the 20 minute catchment, and no full-length

standard courses that might be considered as specialist academy or learning facilities, although

some have an active coaching and development programme.

7.37 Facilities for training/coaching/practice and the development of skills are poor in H&B itself. There

is no par 3 course, and only one GDR in the borough. However, provision for both is better in the

20 minute catchment, and there are ample such facilities in the wider area, albeit that these will be

outside the reasonable drive of H&B residents.

7.38 However, the need for facilities in the area also needs to take into account demand, and this is

addressed below.

Demand

Sports participation

7.39 Current and recent – Sport England data suggests that over the years from 2005/6 to 2015/16

regular participation in golf (once per week) in England declined from 890,000 adult participants

(16+) to about 723,000 (extrapolated from overall APS10 data). Currently, about 1.64% of the

population (mainly male) now play golf regularly (figures from latest annual data from APS10).

7.40 England Golf believes that the participation levels appear to have stabilised after 2015, but the

latest figures show a continued decline in adult numbers. However, England Golf have pointed out

that this global figure should be qualified by the fact that their figures show that 2.54% of the over

16 age group play golf and 2.76% of the 26+ age group (data from SE/EG).

7.41 The likely scenario is that there has been a continual decline in golf participation overall, but that

this has slowed in recent years, and participation among younger adults is higher than the average.


Chart 7.1: Trends in Golf Participation

7.42 East Midlands regional participation has generally declined in line with the national average, while

participation in the local CSP area (the most local data available) has also generally declined,

though there appears to have been a more recent spike in participation in 2015 /APS9 (since

reversed). Hinckley and Bosworth data is not available.

Table 7.12: Participation in Golf (Active People surveys)

7.43 Based on the trends in participation over the past ten years in the areas where consistent data is

available, the current participation in golf among adults in H&B may well be about 1.6 to 1.7%.

However, there is data for H&B from APS1, when local participation levels were significantly above

average, but this data has not been available for 10 years now at this level. It would be unwise to

extrapolate higher levels of participation in the area solely from this old data, unless local data from

clubs and other sources is also available. However, to reflect both of these sets of data, there may

well be about 1400-2200 current regular adult golfers in the area. Even the higher figure is lower

than the MS profiles below. The disparity between these theoretical figures based on market

segmentation and the APS data might be explained by the normal reservations about actual usage

estimated in MS, the different dates when the data was collected and other factors, such as the

2005/06

(APS1)

2007/0

8

(APS2)

2008/0

9

(APS3)

2009/1

0

(APS4)

2010/1

1

(APS5)

2011/1

2

(APS6)

2012/

13

(APS7

)

2013/1

4

(APS8)

2014/1

5

(APS9)

2015/16

(APS10)

England 2.18% 2.29% 2.15% 2.04% 1.96% 1.97% 1.73% 1.67% 1.68% 1.64%

East Midlands 2.42% 2.60% 2.43% 2.07% 2.39% 1.90% 1.86% 1.70% 2.05% 1.74%

Leicester,

Leicestershire

and Rutland

2.54% 2.69% 1.91% 1.97% 1.83% 2.17% 2.06% 1.39% 2.70% 1.60%

Hinckley and

Bosworth

3.73% * * * * * * * * *


relative lack of availability of actual opportunities in the area for golf based on the relatively low

supply of courses in the area. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed that golf participation in

H&B is slightly higher than the national average.

7.44 Participation at local clubs is not recorded, and it is anticipated that this would be difficult to

achieve.

Table 7.13: Participation by Gender according to Active People Surveys

Local population and market profile

Population

7.45 Sport England’s Local Sports Profiles have been used to estimate future population change up to

2020 (Subnational Population Projections. Measure: Population projections for total population, by

age band and gender (000s) 2013-based. Time Period(s): 2014-2020). It is estimated that the

population overall will increase from the base population of 107,700 in 2014, 109,900 in 2017 to

112,200 by 2020, a 4.5% increase overall. However, almost all of this population growth is

anticipated being in the 5-9 and 70 plus age groups. It is unlikely that population change will have

any impact on participation in golf up to 2020 based on this data.

Market segments

7.46 The MS profile is set out in more detail in the Appendix. The three main market segments in H&B

catchment are Tim (sporty male professional), Philip (mid-life professional sporty male) and Roger

and Joy (early retirement couples). These are the highest participants in golf nationally.

7.47 In terms of people within the district who (it is estimated by MS) do play golf, the data confirms

that the major participants are indeed the main segments set out above, Tim, Philip and Roger and

Overall Male Female

APS1 (Oct 05/06) 889,100 2.18% Xx Xx xx xx

APS2 (Oct 07/08) 948300 2.29% 805800 3.99% 142500 0.67%

APS3 (Oct 08/09) 897600 2.15% 758200 3.72% 138700 0.65%

APS4 (Oct 09/10) 860900 2.04% 738800 3.59% 122100 0.57%

APS5 (Oct 10/11) 833200 1.96% 723200 3.49% 110000 0.51%

APS6 (Oct 11/12) 850,500 1.97% 733,000 3.48% 117500 0.53%

APS7 (Oct 12/13) 751,900 1.73% Xx xx xx xx

APS8 (Oct 13/14) 730,300 1.67% Xx xx xx xx

APS9 (Oct 14/Sept 15) 740,100 1.68% Xx xx xx xx

APS10 (Oct 15/Sept 16) 723,000* 1.64% Xx xx xx xx


Joy, who in total comprise nearly 60% of the total golfers in the area. The MS data for the

catchment estimates that total participation in golf is about 3250 adult players, which is

considerably more than the APS data suggests. This is between 2 and 5% of the population of the

district and is spread evenly across the whole of the area.

England Golf data

7.48 England Golf published the ‘Raising Our Game’ strategy in 2014, which clearly defined the

organisation’s strategic direction for the 2014-2017 window (now recently updated with a new

strategy). This document highlighted the need for a strategy to enhance market understanding of

current golf facilities, one of the key considerations to increasing participation, and to map

alongside segmentation. Jigsaw research was commissioned by England Golf in order to create a

market segmentation that is specific to golf. The market segmentation identified that 24% of adults

in England are potential players. This is made up of – 9% current players, 8% lapsed and 7% latent –

around 9.6 million people in total. This research also provided England Golf with 9 defined profiles

and clearly identified behaviours, motivations and barriers within each one. England Golf then

worked with LCMB, facility consultancy, to utilise the segmentation work to develop a facility

strategy and create some practical tools to overlay supply with demand. When looking at a club,

Local Authority or Region, the LCMB mapping report is identifying the total number of golfers

within a 20-minute catchment. This number will include current, lapsed and latent – the full 24%.

Unmet, latent, displaced and future demand

7.49 Latent - MS data suggests that there is latent demand from an additional 1,400 adults in the

catchment area (or over 40% extra to those which MS suggests might currently play). These are

aspirations and considered to be optimistic, as they tend to overestimate the numbers who will

eventually find their way into the sport, but an allowance should be made to accommodate some

potential latent demand in the area.

7.50 Future – little change in participation is anticipated because of population changes from the

present.

7.51 In the shorter term, the newly refreshed England Golf strategy 2017-21 aims to increase

membership of clubs from 650,000 to 675,000, golfers playing twice monthly from 971,000 to over

1m and increase the proportion of females playing to 20%. If this is extrapolated to the local area,

this could result in an increase of another 55-85 players or club members. As the target is

increased participants, it is likely that a large proportion of these would be beginners and young

people (particularly girls) learning the game, for which relatively simple courses would be suitable

as a first step.

7.52 Some of these targets/likely future participation levels are coterminous, but some are based on

long-term projections or unreliable data. A specific target is not appropriate and an end date not

identified, because of the lack of information. However, for the purposes of the study, it may be

reasonable to conclude that in accordance with the existing character of the area, likely population

change and the existing participation levels in golf, demand may increase by about 150 participants

over the next 8-10 years.

Overview of Demand

7.53 Current levels of participation – participation in golf in H&B, extrapolated from APS data, suggests


that there are about 1400 - 2200 regular adult golfers in the area, a slightly higher proportion than

the national average rate. This is considerably lower than the MS profile, but the normal

reservations about the adequacy of the latter data need considering. The estimated total is

compatible with the existence of one members club and a pay and play facility, taking into account

that golfers from H&B do have the chance to play outside the borough within a reasonable drive.

7.54 Recent trends in participation –APS data confirms that participation has dropped slightly in the last

10 years, in accordance with national and regional trends and conventional wisdom from NGBs and

other commentators.

7.55 Latent and future demand – MS data suggests that there is significant potential latent demand

from people in golf-playing segments who would like to take up the sport, in the order of 45%.

This is not considered reasonable. Future demand from population is unlikely to increase

participation. It is reasonable however to assume that there will be a very small increase in

participation in the future from population increase and latent demand.

7.56 NGB targets from strategy – EG has a revised target of a 4% increase in participation over the next

four years of its strategy, with particular emphasis on attracting female players. This is considered

reasonable. It may have particular implications for the type of course required in the area, as

additional participants will be mainly new players needing to learn and develop their skills.

7.57 Overall it is suggested therefore that demand for golf in H&B and the surrounding area, although it

may well have fallen in the last 10 years, is slightly higher than the national average, and that with

future and latent demand increasing only slightly, if at all, and EG actively promoting additional

participation, particularly among new players, demand may increase in the area by no more than

about 5-10% overall up to 2020, (i.e. an additional 100-150 players) with a particular demand for

the types of course suitable for beginners and high handicap players, and that this should be

planned for.

Key Issues

Are there sufficient courses of all types to meet current and future demand for golf in H&B?

There is a below average supply of standard golf courses in H&B and the immediate surrounding

area, any further loss would reduce this further. Demand for golf in the area is estimated to be

slightly above the national average, so in theory there are insufficient facilities to meet overall need.

There is no waiting list to join the local members’ club, but a joining fee is still required for

membership, and the club’s website suggests membership vacancies are limited. It is also likely that

there is excess usage at some peak times as with many courses. Conversely the local commercial

pay and play facility is keen to attract additional players and memberships are still available.

Uncertainty over the future of Forrest Hill will impact on the supply position. Given the local

situation within the borough, it is likely that some residents of H&B have to rely on courses outside

the borough, but within a reasonable driving time, or even outside this 20-minute catchment.

Additional standard golf course provision should therefore be considered to meet the needs of

H&B at the present time. At the very least, the current level of provision of standard 18-hole

courses should be retained to meet current need. In addition, better standard golf course

provision can be justified to accommodate the limited increase in participation that might be

brought about by population change, NGB targets and other indicators of latent demand.


Is there a niche market for the development of a starter course or facilities for informal

recreational and teaching suitable for beginners and young people, which is not being met in

the H&B area?

There are no par 3 courses in H&B, and demand for this type of use must rely on courses outside

the borough. The only GDR in the borough is attached to Forest Hill, closure would mean there are

no GDRs in the borough. If an additional standard course can be justified for current and future

demand (see above), at least part of this demand will come from beginners, juniors and others new

to the game, particularly women and girls. There is also evidence that future development in golf

facilities will need to take into account social factors such as the availability of time and money, and

the need for smaller, shorter courses which are more flexible in their use. This type of demand is

not being met at present in the area, and there is justification in developing a starter facility,

possibly with 9 standard holes, and 9 shorter holes, together with a driving range and other

teaching facilities. Such a facility could represent the first stage in a continuum of facilities from

par 3 and short courses, GDRs, pay and play courses and then members’ courses which developing

players can then join as they progress.

Is quality of courses an issue in the H&B area?

Quality is not generally considered an issue in the H&B area, from the limited evidence available,

though this is based on factors other than actual course condition and quality, which was not

researched as part of this study.

Are there any development initiatives from clubs/NGB/LA/others that might affect future

participation and demand?

The targets set out in the national golf strategy are taken into account in this study, but any local

initiatives from the CGU, LAs, clubs and others will need to be built in.

Is the provision of golf facilities sufficient to meet future demand arising from housing

development and additional population?

The population projections used in this study are trend based data from ONS and do not take into

account housing growth and population increases associated with this. Further analysis may be

necessary to take into account approved housing figures in the future, although this is unlikely to

have a major impact on demand.

Conclusions

7.58 There is a below average supply of standard golf courses in H&B and the immediate surrounding

area. All existing courses in H&B should be retained and protected for the contribution they make

to meeting existing demand for regular play for members and casual golfers alike.

7.59 Forest Hill is under potential threat for an alternative use. The loss would reduce further the supply

and demand balance and mean there would be no GDRs in Hinckley and Bosworth.

7.60 There is a case for the development of a pay and play starter/improvers course catering for new

golfers (say a short 9hole beginners course together with a longer improvers course of 9 holes),

and relevant other practice and coaching facilities, including a GDR available for casual access,

possibly in conjunction with existing courses in the area or as a new enterprise.

8: Hockey


Introduction

8.1 Hockey is now almost exclusively played on AGPs and increasingly, AGPs are also used for football.

The FA now approves certain types of AGP for use in competitive fixtures (those listed on the FA

register) and the FA National Facilities Strategy recognises the role that these facilities play in the

provision of facilities for football. AGPs that are compliant with World Rugby specifications can also

be used for rugby match play and training.

8.2 The analysis of the adequacy of AGPs and the requirement for additional facilities therefore spreads

across all three sports. England Hockey Policy Guidance on AGPs (Artificial Grass Pitch Surface

Policy 2016)) indicates the suitability of AGPs to be as follows;

Category 1 - Water Based (suitable for high level hockey and football training if the pitch is

irrigated)

Category 2- Sand Dressed (acceptable surface for hockey and suitable for football training)

Category 3 - Sand Filled (preferred surface for hockey and suitable for football training)

Category 4 – Long Pile 3g (acceptable surface for football and introductory Level Hockey but

not competitive match play hockey)

8.3 Technology continues to move on and new forms of pitch are being developed frequently. Pitch

requirements are therefore likely to evolve as technology becomes more advanced.

8.4 This section considers the adequacy of AGPS for hockey. Specific needs for football and rugby will

be considered separately in the relevant sport specific sections, however the interrelationships

between the sports will be identified where relevant.

Supply

8.5 Table 8.1 summarises the full size AGPs in Hinckley and Bosworth Borough and outlines the

suitability of these facilities for hockey. It records five full sized pitches, of which four are sand

based pitches and therefore suitable for hockey. All of the pitches are available for community use

although there are some restrictions around the use of the Leicester Road Stadium due to

ownership issues involving the AGP and the surrounding land.

8.6 Spatially, full sized pitches are spread across the borough and are located in four different

settlements - Hinckley, Earl Shilton, Market Bosworth and Groby.

Table 8.1 - Full Sized AGPs in Hinckley and Bosworth

Site Surface Age / Management and

Maintenance

Community Access Suitability for Hockey

Brookvale Learning

Campus – Groby

Sand Filled Built 1997. Refurb circa 2012. .

Managed and maintained in

house with small sinking fund.

Yes Yes - sand filled

Hinckley Academy Sand Filled Built 2008. Managed in house,

basic repairs carried out as part

of maintenance. No sinking

fund

Yes Yes – sand filled


Site Surface Age / Management and

Maintenance

Community Access Suitability for Hockey

Dixie Grammar Sand Filled Built 2014. Managed in house,

basic repairs carried out as part

of maintenance. No sinking

fund


William Bradford

Academy (Heath Lane)

Sand Filled Refurbished 2015. No sinking

fund


Leicester Road

Stadium

3g Built 2006 Yes No - 3g pitch

8.7 There are also several small pitches. These include;

Alans Way Sports Field

Battling Brook Primary School

Bosworth Academy

Hinckley Club for Young People

Markfield Community Sports Centre.

8.8 The pitches at both Alans Way Sports Field and Markfield Community Centre are both sand based

and could therefore have a role to play in hockey training, although they would be insufficient in

size to meet the demand for match play.

8.9 Table 8.1 reveals that all of the pitches that are suitable for hockey are located on school sites. This

means that the Borough Council has more limited control over access to hockey pitches than it

does for most other sports.

8.10 Table 8.1 also demonstrates that the age of facilities is varying, with three pitches relatively recently

provided (Dixie Grammar built 2014 and William Bradford Academy and Brookvale Learning

Campus refurbished in 2015 and 2012 respectively) but the remaining two pitches coming to the

end of their life (built in 1997 and 2008). Consultation reveals that sinking funds have not been

established at any of the sites and there is therefore a need to plan for the point at which surfaces

need to be replaced.

8: Hockey


Pitch Quality

8.11 Table 8.2 summarises the quality of each full sized sand based AGP and highlights any issues

identified. It reveals that overall the quality of facilities is standard but that both newer facilities are

standard to good, with the quality of the pitch at Dixie Grammar School being viewed particularly

positively.

Table 8.2: Quality Issues at Sand Based AGPs that are suitable for hockey

AGP Surface Quality Rating Quality

Brookvale Learning Campus

– Groby

Sand Filled Standard Fully floodlit. Standard quality

pitch with no clear issues.

Equipment good and no

damage to surface visible. Pitch

considered good by users.

Hinckley Academy Sand Filled Standard No issues identified. No

dugouts or seating.

Dixie Grammar Sand Filled Standard to good Standard to good. No concerns

identified. Clear line markings.

No dugouts or spectator

seating

William Bradford Academy

(Heath Lane)

Sand Filled Standard to Good Standard to good. Floodlit and

clear line markings with no

evidence of damage to surface.

Demand

Current Participation

8.12 Hinckley Hockey Club are the only club affiliated to England Hockey in the borough. They currently

have one team in the 2017 – 2018 season of the Leicestershire Hockey League and are based at

Dixie Grammar School.

8.13 The number of teams at the club has been static over several seasons and the club have no

aspirations for further growth. Indeed they reference falling membership as one of their key barriers

and indicate that they may be forced to fold at the end of the season as they are struggling to put

out a team each week. Intelligence gathered during July 2018 indicates that the club have indeed


folded and the remaining players have merged with Coalville Hockey Club (North West

Leicestershire District). Further illustrating the decline in club based hockey in recent years,

Bosworth Ladies have also folded in recent seasons.

8.14 There are five teams affiliated to the Leicestershire Mixed Hockey Association (but not England

Hockey) currently playing in Hinckley and Bosworth. These teams all play at Brookvale Learning

Campus, Groby and play competitive fixtures each weekend.

8.15 The number of teams in the Mixed Hockey league is declining and indeed it now at its lowest since

1975. The number of players involved remains static however, with Mixed Hockey Association

Research suggesting that a higher number of players is now required to run a team (due to shift

work etc). Further decline is likely next year, with it being known that only four teams will play in

the Mixed Hockey Association at Brookvale Learning campus next season and an overall reduction

in the number of teams in the league likely. This suggests that like affiliated hockey, demand for

hockey in the borough is unlikely to increase significantly without sports development intervention.

8.16 In addition to the above teams, Ashby Hockey Club also travel into the borough on occasion to use

Dixie Grammar as an overspill venue when their own ground (Ivanhoe College) is at capacity.

8.17 Table 8.3 summarises the teams playing within the Borough and outlines the approximate number

of hours that each site is used for hockey for club activity. The usage is based upon the assumption

that each team plays alternate home and away games.

Table 8.3: Hockey Teams in Hinckley and Bosworth

Site Club Playing

at Venue Teams Pitch Usage

Participation Trends

Dixie Grammar

School

Hinckley

Hockey Club

Ashby Hockey

Club (displaced

from North

West

Leicestershire)

1 permanent

and ad hoc

usage from

second club

1.5 hours

training, 2

hours

competitive

activity every

other week.

Ad hoc

additional 1 – 2

hours on a

Saturday

Declining club membership, club

now struggling to field a team.

Since the initial data collection

took place, this club has folded.

Brookvale

Learning Campus

Mixed Hockey

Association -

Druck

Aadvarks,

Leicestershire

Hospitals (3)

5 3 -4.5 hours

each Saturday.

Some use for

training

midweek

Number of mixed hockey teams

in league declining, with the

number of teams in 2018 the

lowest since 1975 / 76. The

number of players in teams is

however thought to be static /

increasing.

Hinckley Academy None 0 None N/A


Site Club Playing

at Venue Teams Pitch Usage

Participation Trends

William Bradford

Academy

None 0 None N/A

8.18 It is clear from Table 8.3 that only two of the four sand based facilities are used for hockey. There is

only limited hockey across the borough and no opportunities for junior hockey at all. The highest

levels of usage are at the weekend, with all teams playing their competitive fixtures on a Saturday.

Concerns have been raised however with regards the use of the pitch at Brookvale Learning Centre

- the school are only willing to open the facility up if there are several hours of usage planned. With

declining team numbers, this is becoming more difficult to fulfil.

8.19 While all clubs play competitively, there is very little use of facilities midweek for training and

training requirements are fairly minimal.

Displaced Demand

8.20 All teams are playing where they currently wish to and there is no evidence of teams being

displaced outside of Hinckley and Bosworth for hockey. Instead, Ashby Hockey Club import some

demand into the Borough, using Dixie Grammar School as an overspill.

Educational Demand

8.21 Educational use of AGPs takes place outside of peak hours and there is therefore no impact upon

the availability of the facilities for community hockey (as the artificial surface means that AGPs are

not impacted upon by levels of use in the same way that grass pitches are).

8.22 School participation can however have a knock on impact on demand for hockey. At a national

schools level, tournaments are run for U14, U16 and U18 age groups for both genders. The number

of schools entering these tournaments is however declining, with this generally attributed to lack of

staff, the need to have time off to participate and frequently, the loss or resurface of a pitch means

that the school no longer has a facility on which to train.

8.23 The School Sports Partnership (Team Leicestershire), runs Leicestershire wide competition in a

range of sports and there has been clear interest in hockey from schools in Hinckley and Bosworth.

Dixie Grammar, Redmoor Academy, Hinckley Academy, Market Bosworth School all playing in

competitions this year. Interest in hockey at a school level may translate to greater interest in

hockey at a young age and a desire to follow pathways into clubs, however it is clear that there are

no obvious opportunities for this currently.

8.24 Increasing participation in hockey in schools is seen as a key means of driving greater levels of

participation into clubs and is likely to be the key vehicle for generating increased activity in future

years.

The Player Pathway – Development Centres and Academy Centres

8.25 Development Centres are the First phase of England Hockey’s Player Pathway, and are the

foundation stage for the route to international hockey. They provide a local entry point to the

player pathway for U13 – U17 players.


8.26 There are four Development Centres currently running across Leicestershire and organisers look to

run these at different times and on different days to maximise opportunities.

8.27 While not used this season as a Development Centre venue, Dixie Grammar has been an important

venue for hosting the player pathway in recent years, accommdating weekly midweek sessions.


8.28 The adequacy of AGPs to accommodate demand for hockey, taking into account both training and

competitive fixtures is discussed below. Demand for football is also considered as while hockey

teams cannot use facilities designed for football (3g pitches), the lack of 3g pitches in the borough

means that sand based surfaces are used for football training (as well as ad hoc community activity)

and hockey clubs therefore face extensive competition in accessing pitches. The FA facility strategy

seeks to shift football usage away from sand based AGPs to 3g pitches however and if the stock of

3g pitches is adequate for football, it is likely that activity on sand based sites will be reserved for

hockey.

Situation at Individual Sites

8.29 Supply and demand of AGPs is measured by considering;

the amount of play that a site is able to sustain (based upon the number of hours that the

pitch is accessible to the community during peak periods up to a maximum of 34 hours per

week). Peak periods have been deemed to be Monday to Thursday 18:00 to 21:00; Friday

17:00 to 19:00 and Saturday and Sunday 09:00 to 17:00;

the amount of play that takes place (measured in hours);

whether there is any spare capacity at the site based upon a comparison between the

capacity of the site and the actual usage; and

any other key issues relating to the site which have arisen through consultation.

8.30 To ensure that issues for hockey are fully taken into account however, as well as evaluating usage

over the week, capacity at peak time should also be considered. England Hockey indicates that an

AGP should be considered able to sustain a maximum of four to five games per day, however this is

dependent on factors such as floodlighting, warm up areas and local league structures.

8.31 It should be noted that usage figures are approximate only as bookings at several sites fluctuate.


118

Table 8.4: Site Specific Usage

Sit

e

Pit

ch

Qu

ali

ty

Cu

rren

t C

arr

yin

g

Cap

acit

y f

or

Co

mm

un

ity U

se

Cu

rren

t C

om

mu

nit

y U

se

Avail

ab

ilit

y

Key I

ssu

es

an

d V

iew

s

Dixie

Grammar

School

Good -

Standard 21

3.5 hours

hockey.

Remainder

of use is

football

Able to

sustain

additional

play

Good quality hockey facility currently accommodating

training as part of the Single System as well as club based

activity (primarily overspill from North West Leicestershire).

The site is also heavily used for football. Scope to

accommodate a small amount of further play and limited

community use on a Sunday..

Brookvale

Learning

Campus

Standard 29

On average

3 -4 hours

per week

hockey

usage.

Able to

sustain

additional

play

Good quality hockey facility but heavily used for football

although there is some hockey use on a Saturday and

midweek for evening training sessions. Some slots available

for further play but generally outside of the most popular

training times. Site is perceived to be expensive by hockey

users and there are also concerns raised about the desire of

the school to ensure that several hours of usage are planned

if the facility is opened up. This raises difficulties for clubs just

wishing to hire the site for a couple of hours.

Hinckley

Academy Standard 16

No hockey

usage.

Able to

sustain

additional

play

No use for hockey at all and facility is closed at a weekend

due to lack of demand. Used midweek for football training

William

Bradford

Academy

Good to

standard 34

No hockey

usage.

Able to

sustain

additional

play

Good quality pitch that is not used at all for hockey but

heavily used for football. School have aspirations to provide a

3g pitch.

Leicester City Council: Playing Pitch Strategy Assessment Report 119


Current Picture of Provision

8.32 Table 8.5 therefore indicates that there is spare capacity at sites that are suitable for hockey across

the week and at weekends with two of the four pitches that are suitable for hockey not used at all.

Most pitches are used for football training during the week, but cannot be used for football match

play due to FA restrictions on the types of surface that can accommodate consecutive activity.

8.33 England Hockey indicates that an AGP should be considered able to sustain a maximum of four to

five games per day depending upon circumstances. Table 8.5 evaluates the use at peak time

(Saturday) on each AGP and indicates that there is scope to increase the amount of play.

Table 8.5: Peak Time Demand

Site Name

Capacity of full

sized sand based

pitches across

the borough at

peak time (match

equivalents)

Total Demand (Match

Equivalents)

Difference (Match

Equivalents)

Dixie Grammar 4 1 3

Brookvale Learning

Campus

4

1.5 2.5

William Bradford

Academy

4

0 4

Hinckley Academy 4 0 4

TOTAL 12 2 13.5

8.34 Table 8.5 therefore reveals that there is significant spare capacity in the borough at peak time.

Indeed demand is such that all activity could be accommodated within one AGP.

England Hockey Perspective

8.35 The England Hockey Facilities Strategy (2017) provides a perspective on the facilities that the

Governing Body perceive to be required for hockey.

8.36 England Hockey Strategy

Vision: For every hockey club in England to have appropriate and sustainable facilities that provide

excellent experiences for players.

Mission: More, Better, Happier Players with access to appropriate and sustainable facilities.

Our club market is well structured and clubs are required to affiliate to England Hockey to play in

community leagues. As a result only relatively few occasional teams lie outside our affiliation

structure. Schools and Universities are the other two areas where significant hockey is played.

The 3 main objectives of the facilities strategy are:

1. PROTECT: To conserve the existing hockey provision


We currently have over 800 pitches that are used by hockey clubs (club, school, universities.) We

need to retain the current provision where appropriate to ensure that hockey is maintained across

the country.

2. IMPROVE: To improve the existing facilities stock (physically and administratively).

The current facilities stock is ageing and there needs to be strategic investment into refurbishing

the pitches and ancillary facilities. There needs to more support for clubs to obtain better

agreements with facilities providers & education around owning an asset.

3. DEVELOP: To strategically build new hockey facilities where there is an identified need

and ability to deliver and maintain. This might include consolidating hockey provision in

a local area where appropriate.

The research has identified key areas across the country where there is a lack of suitable Hockey

provision and there is a need for additional pitches. There is an identified demand for multi pitches

in the right places to consolidate hockey and allow clubs to have all of their provision catered for at

one site.

8.37 The strategy seeks to provide clear rationale that identifies where multi pitch sites should be placed

and strategic priorities to stabilise the future of England Hockey.

8.38 With regards facilities, it provides guidance that multi pitch sites are required / viable for clubs

reaching 500 members or more (although access to pitches at a second site is likely to be required

much before this). England Hockey research indicates that in addition to generating additional

opportunities for training in an evening, a small sized training pitch located adjacent to the main

pitch can add benefits at peak time and increase the capacity of the full size pitch. If this pitch is

used for warm ups for competitive fixtures, the number of matches that an AGP can sustain on

peak day increases to 5 matches.

8.39 There is no evidence that any of the teams within Hinckley and Bosworth require additional

facilities or hockey, and indeed, linking with (3), Develop, there may be a need to consolidate some

hockey provision in the area due to the lack of use of many of the facilities.

Mixed Hockey Association

8.40 The Mixed Hockey Association are not affiliated to England Hockey and instead operate

independently. They currently believe that the quality of facilities in Leicestershire is the greatest

facility related challenge (although the pitch used in Hinckley and Bosworth Borough is deemed to

be good). The price of facility hire, along with the management of facilities is also raised as an issue

impacting upon demand for hockey.

Latent Demand

8.41 There is no evidence of latent demand for hockey in the area, with existing clubs currently

struggling to gain appropriate numbers of members to run a team. Instead, the borough is

accommodating displaced demand from neighbouring authorities.

8.42 The Mixed Hockey Association however believe that there is latent demand, with opportunities to

increase interest if awareness of hockey was improved and there was greater structured

participation within the state school environment.



8.43 The future requirement for AGPs for hockey will be impacted upon by several things, including

population growth, changes to the demographic profile, club development and evolving

participation trends. These issues are considered in turn in order to build an accurate picture of

future demand.

Population Change


generate one team. By applying TGRs to population projections, we can project the theoretical

number of teams that would be generated from population growth and gain an understanding of

future demand.

8.45 Table 8.6 summarises the implications of population growth and reveals that because of low levels

of hockey participation; population growth will have no impact in any age group.


Sport and Age

Groups

Number of

Teams

Current

population

in age

group

within the

area

Current

TGR

Population

2031

Change in

Number

of People

in Age

Group

Potential

Change

in Team

Numbers

by 2036

Senior Men (16-

55yrs)

0 (but

equivalent

3 taking

into

account

mixed) 26948

8983

26792 -156 0.0

Senior Women

(16-55yrs)

1 (but

equivalent

3 taking

into

account

mixed) 26948

8983

26792 -156 0.0

Junior Boys (11-

15yrs)

0

2941

0 3027

86 0.0

Junior Girls (11-

15yrs)

0

2941

0

3027 86 0.0

8.46 This means that trends based population changes would result in demands for hockey pitches

remaining static.


Changes in Participation Trends

8.47 While population growth will have limited impact on participation, England Hockey seek to build

participation in the sport, with a particular focus placed upon retention of existing players as well as

an increase in the number of players aged 14+. In addition to the traditional form of the game, new

forms of hockey have also been introduced, including Rush Hockey and Back to Hockey. These

forms do not require formal facilities and can be played on any facility (including the small based

sand AGPs).

8.48 Despite England Hockey aspirations, Hinckley Hockey Club, the only affiliated club in the borough

are currently experiencing issues fielding a team and have recently merged with Coalville Hockey

Club. This follows the collapse of Bosworth Ladies in recent years.

8.49 Added to this, the Mixed Hockey Association has also experienced a downward trend in the

number of teams that are playing, although playing numbers continue to increase (more players

are required per team due to flexible working practices etc meaning that people no longer wish to

play every week.

8.50 There is therefore no clear growth that is likely to take place in the Borough in participation in

hockey over the strategy period. England Hockey has however committed to commence

development works, focusing initially with partnership working with the schools with a view to

channelling interest into clubs longer term.


8.51 There are no known confirmed plans that will impact upon the supply of AGPs for hockey although

Brookvale Learning Campus, Hinckley Academy and the William Bradford Academy are all looking

to provide 3g pitches on their sites, potentially at the expense of the existing sand based facilities.

This will require further examination in order to ensure that the required number of facilities is

retained for hockey.


5.74 The key issues for hockey are summarised below.

Summary – Hockey

There are four sand based AGPs but only two are currently used for hockey. Demand equates to

only 2 match equivalents at peak time (Saturday) and a small number of hours midweek for

training. This could therefore be accommodated on one AGP

The quality of facilities is generally standard to good, although there are no sinking funds in place

and therefore potentially longer term concerns about quality issues as surfaces age

Existing levels of participation in hockey are declining and there are concerns that the only affiliated

club will fold at the end of the season. Added to this, the number of teams playing in Mixed Hockey

Association leagues are also declining (although the number of teams is increasing). Without

significant intervention, hockey participation in the borough may become almost extinct.

9: Rugby Union


Introduction

9.1 This section evaluates the adequacy of pitches for rugby union. It provides;

An overview of the supply and demand for pitches

An understanding of activity at individual sites

A picture of the adequacy of current provision to meet current and projected future demand.

Overview – Supply and Demand

Pitch Supply

9.2 There are 22 senior rugby union pitches located in Hinckley and Bosworth BC. Table 9.1

summarises the distribution of grass pitches and outlines the level of access that is available.

Table 9.1: Rugby Union Pitches across Hinckley and Bosworth BC

Site

Facility Type

Total Rugby

Pitches

Number

of

Floodlit

Pitches

Level of

Community

Use

Sub Area

Hinckley

Academy

School -

Academy site 2

0 Unsecured Hinckley

Hinckley Rugby

Club

Club

4 and 5 midi

2.5 Secured Hinckley and

Burbage

Burbage Rugby

Club

Parish Council

owned site 1

0 Secured Hinckley and

Burbage

Hastings High

School

School -

Academy site 2

0 Unsecured Hinckley and

Burbage

Redmoor

Academy

School -

Academy site 1

0 Unsecured Hinckley and

Burbage

Market Bosworth

Rugby Club

Club

5

1 Secured Northern

Parishes

Brookvale

Learning Campus

School -

Academy site 2

0 Unsecured Northern

Parishes

South

Charnwood High

School

School -

Academy site 1


Parishes

St Martins

Catholic

Academy

School -

Academy site 1


Parishes

Market Bosworth

School

School -

Academy site 2


Parishes

Bosworth School -

Academy site 1



Site

Facility Type

Total Rugby

Pitches

Number

of

Floodlit

Pitches

Level of

Community

Use

Sub Area

Academy Parishes

Dixie Grammar

School

School -

Academy site 1


Parishes

9.3 Table 9.1 indicates that;

Just under half of the rugby pitches in the borough are located within the Hinckley and

Burbage urban area. The remainder of facilities are however spread across the Borough, with

the presence of facilities at most school sites ensuring that there are facilities in most of the

larger settlements

less than half of all rugby union pitches are secured for community use. Most school sites

offer some degree of access to the general public, but as academies, almost all of this access

is on an unsecured basis. Schools are actually the largest provider of rugby union pitches in

the borough.

Nine full sized pitches are managed by local clubs, with Market Bosworth RFC and Hinckley

RFC having large facilities respectively (5 and 4 pitches respectively). Unlike other sports,

there are no rugby pitches provided by Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council. The pitch

provided at Burbage for Burbage RFC is the only pitch provided by a Parish Council

the amount of pitches containing floodlights is minimal - there are just 3.5 pitches in total.

This means that opportunities for training are limited, particularly for Burbage RFC who do

not have floodlit facilities at their own site. Floodlit pitches are concentrated on the other

two club bases.

Pitch Quality

9.4 Table 9.2 explores the pitches that are available for community use in more detail. It highlights the

pitches that are provided at each site, and the key issues relating to site quality that were identified

through both site visits and club and key stakeholder consultation.

9.5 Assessments of pitch quality for rugby are based on guidance produced by the RFU and Sport

England (http://www.sportengland.org/facilities-planning/planning-for-sport/planning-tools-and-

guidance/playing-pitch-strategy-guidance/. As well as recording key characteristics of the site,

including pitch condition and available ancillary facilities, the assessment also evaluates the

frequency and type of maintenance, and the drainage that is installed on the site.

9.6 Table 9.2 reveals that the key issues for quality in relation to club based pitches in Hinckley and

Bosworth are;

Opportunities to increase the amount of maintenance undertaken and to better tailor this to

the pitches provided. Maintenance is is particularly limited outside of the main club pitches

(eg on pitches used by juniors) due to financial restrictions. Improving the maintenance

would however increase pitch capacity;

There are drainage issues on several sites, with waterlogging evident;

http://www.sportengland.org/facilities-planning/planning-for-sport/planning-tools-and-guidance/playing-pitch-strategy-guidance/

http://www.sportengland.org/facilities-planning/planning-for-sport/planning-tools-and-guidance/playing-pitch-strategy-guidance/


Clubs raise concerns about the adequacy of changing facilities / pavilions;

there are insufficient floodlights to meet with the needs of all clubs.

.


Table 9.2: Quality of Sites in Hinckley and Bosworth

Site Total Rugby Pitches

Maintenance Rating Quality Comments

Hinckley Academy 2

M0/D1 Drainage is good but pitches are undulating. Changing facilities average

Hinckley Rugby Club

4 and 5 midi

Pitch 1 M1/D1. Pitch 2 M1 D2

(but drainage is poor) Pitch 3

M0/D1 Pitch 4 M0 / D1 Minis

M0/D1

Quality got slightly better. Main issues with cancellations due to drainage / overuse. Club consider

two pitches to be good and two to be standard. Some rust on the post outside of the main pitches

and there are concerns with drainage on all pitches. Pitches 3 and 4 also have a degree of undulation.

There are 4 changing rooms and 2 portacabins - club raise concerns with insufficient changing rooms

(need 8). The showers are also poor

Burbage Rugby Club

1

M0/D1

Pitch quality is static. Waterlogging main cause of cancellations. Pitch quality standard with grass well

cut, but there is rust on the goal posts. Pitch is publicly accessible so suffers from dog fouling, but is

generally ok and well maintained. Includes appropriate changing and officials room, but there is no

clubhouse - no kitchen etc. There are currently plans to build a new changing room facility for the

football and rugby teams but there are concerns about whether it will meet the RFU and FA

requirements - approval likely to be subject to meeting. Parish Council indicate that there are rabbits

on site so they need to be filled regularly.

Hastings High

School 2

M0/D1 Pitch quality considered reasonable, with good drainage and adequate parking

Redmoor Academy

1

M0/D1 Pitches standard but drainage and levels are good. Ancillary facilities good with changing rooms,

shower and carparking on site

Market Bosworth

Rugby Club 5

M0/D1

Improving due to implementation of RFU recommendations relating to maintenance. Recently

developed 4 new changing rooms

Brookvale Learning

Campus 2

M0/D1

Pitches of standard quality. Changing facilities also standard but showers are poor.

South Charnwood

High School 1

M0/D1

Overall pitch quality is standard. Changing facilities and showers are good.


Site Total Rugby Pitches

Maintenance Rating Quality Comments

St Martins Catholic

Academy 1

M0/D1

Drainage poor on site

Market Bosworth

School 2

M0/D1

Poor drainage and some undulations. Grass cutting also poor

Bosworth Academy

1

M0/D1

No quality issues identified

Dixie Grammar

School 1

M0/D1

Pitches in good condition with changing accommodation


Demand

9.7 There are three rugby union clubs in the Borough running a total of 7 adult teams, 2 colts, 8 youth

and 12 midi teams.

9.8 Both Hinckley RFC and Market Bosworth RFC offer progression from junior through to seniors,

running teams at all age groups while Burbage RUFC only run two senior teams. This level of junior

play suggests that rugby union is relatively well developed within the borough. There are however

no female teams at any age groups and this represents a key gap for future development.

9.9 Table 9.3 summarises the clubs and provides a breakdown of teams that they are running as well as

their recent participation trends. It indicates that overall, participation is increasing in the younger

age groups while older age groups are generally static.

Table 9.3: Rugby Union Clubs in Hinckley and Bosworth

Area Club Adult Colts Youth Midi Trends

Northern

Parishes

Market

Bosworth

RFC

2 1 4 6 Senior decline, static youth

participation. Increasing midi

Hinckley

and

Burbage

Urban Area

Hinckley RFC

3 1 4 6 Static senior, static youth.

Increasing midi

Hinckley

and

Burbage

Urban Area

Burbage RFC

2 0 0 0 Increasing

TOTAL 7 2 8 12

Training Needs

9.10 Club training requirements are as follows;

Market Bosworth RFC - 2 match equivalents for adult teams. Youth teams also train midweek

meaning that the total match equivalent is 4.5

Hinckley RFC have high training requirements, with senior and colts teams all training twice

per week. As well as the club base, the club also use facilities at John Cleveland College,

Leicester Road FC, Dixie Grammar, Hinckley Leisure Centre and William Bradford School on

occasion. Hinckley RFC is also used by Burbage RFC teams for winter training (due to lack of

floodlights at their own venue).

Burbage RFC - two teams train twice per week, meaning that demand is equivalent to 1

match equivalent. A lack of floodlights at the club base however means that the club must

travel elsewhere during the winter months for training sessions. These currently take place at

Hinckley RFC


9.11 Only Burbage RFC highlight particular pressures arising from their training requirements.

Educational Demand

9.12 Almost all schools in the borough have at least one rugby pitch, suggesting that there are strong

foundations for the teaching of rugby. There is little evidence of participation in national rugby

competitions, although both Dixie Grammar School and Market Bosworth School have entered

competitions within the last couple of years.


9.13 The adequacy of pitch provision for rugby union is measured through the use of match equivalents.

The ability of the pitch stock to service both training needs and competitive requirements is taken

into account. To fully understand activity on a site, consideration is given to both;

the adequacy of pitch provision over the course of a week; and

capacity of a site to meet additional demand at peak time.

9.14 For rugby union, this analysis is based upon the following principles;

Capacity over the course of a week

9.15 The RFU sets a standard number of match equivalent sessions that natural grass pitches should be

able to sustain without adversely affecting their current quality (pitch carrying capacity). This is

based upon the drainage system installed at the site and the maintenance programme used to

prepare the pitches. The guideline theoretical capacity for rugby pitches is summarised in Table

9.4.

Table 9.4: Theoretical Pitch Capacity Ratings (RFU)

Maintenance

Poor (M0) Standard (M1) Good (M2)

Dra

inag

e

Natural Inadequate (D0) 0.5 1.5 2

Natural Adequate (D1) 1.5 2 3

Pipe Drained (D2) 1.75 2.5 3.25

Pipe and Slit Drained (D3) 2 3 3.5

9.16 Demand from each rugby club is converted into match equivalent sessions. This takes into account

of both the requirement of pitches to accommodate competitive fixtures, and also the impact that

training sessions will have on the capacity of pitches.

Peak Time Demand

9.17 To identify spare capacity at peak time, the number of match equivalent sessions at peak time is

measured against the number of match equivalent sessions available.

Senior men’s rugby union - Saturday PM;


Youth rugby union - Sunday AM;

Mini/midi rugby union - Sunday AM; and

U18-U19 yrs ‘Colts’ rugby union –Sunday AM (male) and Sunday PM (female).

9.18 Table 9.5 therefore provides a summary of activity at each site that is secured for community use

and the adequacy of provision to meet demand. Further detail is provided in the spreadsheet

accompanying this assessment of need.

9.19 The text that follows then explores the issues identified in more detail, highlighting the areas of key

concern based upon the calculations undertaken.


132

Table 9.5: Site Overview

Site

Maintenance

/ Capacity

Rating

Senior

Pitches

Floodlit

Pitches

Match

Play

Match

Equivalents

(Training)

Other

Spare

Capacity

(Match

Play)

Spare

Capacity

at Peak

Time

(Adult

Play)

Spare Capacity

Peak Time

(Youth Play)

Spare

Capacity

Including

Training

Training

Capacity

only (floodlit

pitch

capacity -

requirement)

Overview

Market

Bosworth -

Cadeby Lane

M0/D1 5 1 4.5 4.5

3 3.5 1.5 -1.5 -3

Large rugby club where capacity is currently limited by maintenance programme

although recent improvements have been made with support from RFU. Some

drainage issues also experienced. Site sufficient to accommodate match play.

Training on site at club base however pressurises the pitches, particularly given the

limited maintenance programme. Given that there are only floodlights on one pitch,

this pitch is particularly heavily used. 4 new changing rooms have recently been

developed but finances limit ongoing development. Usage of the AGP at Leicester

Forest when complete (or relocation of training elsewhere) would see pitch

provision become adequate. If training remains on site, additional floodlighting is

required.

Hinckley RFC

- Leicester

Road

Pitch 1

M1/D1. Pitch

2 M1 D2 (but

drainage is

poor) Pitch 3

M0/D1 Pitch

4 M0 / D1

Minis M0/D1

4 (and 5

midi) 2.5 5 7

Some

training

during the

winter

months by 2

Burbage

teams - 1

extra match

equivalent.

Also didi

rugby and

O2 touch (1

each per

week) and

25 school

matches

across the

2 2 2 -5 -2.625

Site is heavily used accommodating all competitive and training activity for large

club as well as training overspill from nearby club. Site also hosts occasional fixtures

for Leicestershire RFU. Maintenance on the first two pitches is standard, but the

second two pitches receive much lower levels of maintenance. Total capacity

therefore equates to 7. All pitches suffer from poor drainage and the newly installed

drainage on the floodlit pitch is also not performing as hoped. Added to this, there

are also some concerns with the adequacy of changing accommodation, as there

are currently insufficient rooms and existing facilities are poor quality. Capacity

overall is just sufficient to meet requirements for match play (supported by the

availability of midi pitches off the adult pitches) but training pitches are overplayed.

When taking into account training (and the use from other bodies), overall

provision is insufficient.


Site

Maintenance

/ Capacity

Rating

Senior

Pitches

Floodlit

Pitches

Match

Play

Match

Equivalents

(Training)

Other

Spare

Capacity

(Match

Play)

Spare

Capacity

at Peak

Time

(Adult

Play)

Spare Capacity

Peak Time

(Youth Play)

Spare

Capacity

Including

Training

Training

Capacity

only (floodlit

pitch

capacity -

requirement)

Overview

season

Burbage RFC

- Britannia

Fields

M0/D1 1 0 1 1 5 match

equivalents 1 0.5

0.5(dependent

upon use for

training)

-0.5 -1

With just two teams playing on the site, the single pitch is sufficient to

accommodate competitive play (although the club do experience some fixture

clashes on occasion). There is also sufficient capacity to accommodate training,

given the M1 maintenance regime, although actual use of the pitch for training is

inhibited by the lack of floodlights. Pitch condition is standard overall although the

site suffers from dog fouling. There is no clubhouse on the site and changing is

basic only and a distance from the pitch although this is due to be reprovided

imminently. Lease expires in 2022 and there are therefore also concerns around

security of tenure.

Hinckley

Academy M0/D1 2 1.5 1

1 2 0.5 2 0 School site with restricted maintenance procedure which limits capacity.

Accommodates school use only

Hastings

High

School

M0/D1 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 School site with restricted maintenance procedure which limits capacity.


Redmoor

Academy M0/D1 1 0 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0

School site with restricted maintenance procedure which limits capacity.


Brookvale

Learning

Campus




Site

Maintenance

/ Capacity

Rating

Senior

Pitches

Floodlit

Pitches

Match

Play

Match

Equivalents

(Training)

Other

Spare

Capacity

(Match

Play)

Spare

Capacity

at Peak

Time

(Adult

Play)

Spare Capacity

Peak Time

(Youth Play)

Spare

Capacity

Including

Training

Training

Capacity

only (floodlit

pitch

capacity -

requirement)

Overview

South

Charnwood

High

School

M0/D1 1 0 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0 School site with restricted maintenance procedure which limits capacity.


St Martins

Catholic

Academy

M0/D1 1 0 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0 School site with restricted maintenance procedure which limits capacity.


Market

Bosworth

School



Bosworth

Academy M0/D1 1 0 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0

School site with restricted maintenance procedure which limits capacity.


Dixie

Grammar

School

M0/D1

0 1

1

-1

0.5 0.5


135

Current Picture of Provision - Secured sites

9.20 Table 9.5 therefore indicates that;

There is no use of any of the school sites by rugby clubs, with no facilities used on a regular

basis. All of these sites accommodate curricular use only. This means that there are 13 rugby

pitches in the borough that are available but not used. The capacity of these facilities is

however limited, with the maintenance programme at all sites (where known) fairly restricted

(M0) meaning that maximum site capacity is 1.5. Given that these pitches must also sustain

curricular use, this restricts the amount of club based activity that they could accommodate.

In total at school sites, there is scope to accommodate 6.5 match equivalents either across

the week or at peak time. On the whole however, the limited maintenance that takes place at

these sites restricts opportunities for community use, as pitches are only capable of

sustaining curricular activity.

Considering match play only, there is sufficient capacity at each of the club bases to

accommodate play. Once training is taken into account, supply however becomes much

more tightly matched with demand. Specifically;

At Market Bosworth, limited, but improving maintenance procedures restrict capacity

to a degree however quality is starting to improve following investment and it is

anticipated that capacity will start to increase shorty. The site is sufficient in terms of

capacity to accommodate match play (both peak time and across the week) but

training places pressures on the pitches and a small degree of overplay is evident.

This is exacerbated by the presence of only one set of floodlights, which means that

all activity is shoehorned onto tis pitch, meaning that it is heavily used.

At Hinckley RFC, there are varying levels of maintenance, with pitches

accommodating the teams playing at higher levels getting more attention. The club

also raise concerns about drainage and both of these issues impact upon capacity.

Excluding the impact of training, there is a small amount of spare capacity across the

week and at peak time. The current levels of training however generate overplay,

particularly on the training pitches as all activity must be concentrated on the floodlit

pitches. The midi pitches on site are important in reducing the use of the senior

pitches and in minimalizing the overplay that is found. There are also insufficient

changing rooms, with 8 required to ensure that all pitches can be used at the same

time

Maintenance schedules at Burbage RFC restrict club activity, but with just two teams,

provision is sufficient to accommodate match play (supply equals demand). The lack

of floodlighting however means that the site can not sustain training activity in the

winter and the team are therefore forced to locate elsewhere. There are also concerns

about the security of tenure on this site. While changing rooms are currently poor,

they are due to be improved although it is not known whether this will also involve

extension of the lease for the rugby club.

9.21 Although there are unused facilities at school sites, it should be noted that rugby is primarily a club

focused sport and facilities are an essential part of the way a club is run. Use of facilities that are

outside of the club base is therefore avoided as far as possible. Added to this, there are no existing

floodlights at any of the school sites, meaning that they cannot be used for training.

Displaced and Latent Demand


9.22 Burbage RUFC are the only example of displaced demand at the current time for Rugby Union in

Hinckley and Bosworth, with the club being forced to use other venues to train due to a lack of

floodlights.

9.23 No concerns have been expressed with regards the amount of facilities available to other clubs,

although it is believed that high levels of training and a lack of appropriate training facilities places

great pressures on both Hinckley RFC and Market Bosworth RFC.

Future Picture

9.24 The future requirement for rugby pitches will be impacted upon by changes to the population

profile, as well as club specific aspirations and changing participation trends. These issues are

considered in turn in order to build an accurate picture of future demand.

Population Change


generate one team. The application of TGRs to population projections enables the projection of the

theoretical number of teams that would be generated from population growth and provides an

understanding of future demand.

9.26 Table 9.6 summarises the current TGRs for rugby and projects the impact of population growth. It

indicates that;

there will be an overall decline in the number of people playing adult rugby union, but this

will be insufficient to see the loss of a team; and

similarly, increases in people falling into the younger ages will be insufficient to see an

overall impact upon the number of rugby union teams in the borough.


Sport and Age

Groups

Number

of

Teams

Current

population

in age

group

Current

TGR

Future

Population

(2036)

Potential

Change in

Number

of People

in Age

Group

Potential

Change in

Team

Numbers by

2036

Rugby Union

Senior Men (19-

45yrs)

7

16738

2391 16681

-57 0.0

Rugby Union

Senior Women

(19-45yrs)

0

16738

0 16681

-57 0

Rugby Union

Youth Boys (13-

18yrs)

10

3550

355

3506 -44 -0.1

Rugby Union

Youth Girls (13-

18yrs)

0

3550

0

3506 -44 00


Sport and Age

Groups

Number

of

Teams

Current

population

in age

group

Current

TGR

Future

Population

(2036)

Potential

Change in

Number

of People

in Age

Group

Potential

Change in

Team

Numbers by

2036

Rugby Union

Mini/Midi Mixed

(7-12yrs)

12 7273 606

7443 170 0.3

9.27 Trends based population growth alone is therefore unlikely to have significant impact upon the

demand for rugby union within Hinckley BC.

Changes in Participation Trends and club development plans

9.28 While TGRs provide an indication of the potential impact of club growth directly attributable to

increases in the population, the RFU believe that this is less indicative of the likely growth as a

whole for rugby. The RFU are working with individual clubs through the implementation of

development plans to drive increases in participation, supported by RFU development officers.

Aspirations of clubs within Hinckley and Bosworth are as follows;

Market Bosworth RFC - looking to develop additional senior male team and create senior

female team

Hinckley RFC - retain existing teams and ensure stability and growth of playing numbers

Burbage RFC - no immediate aspirations for growth, although longer term club would like to

develop an additional team.

9.29 Table 9.7 therefore draws upon the application of TGRs as well as the aspired levels of growth at

each club to evaluate the degree to which existing pitches at the club bases are able to

accommodate the projected increase in demand, and the issues that would need to be addressed

to ensure that growth can be accommodated. It should be noted however that growth plans are

over a shorter term than the strategy period and should therefore be reconsidered as part of the

monitoring process.

Table 9.7: Adequacy of Existing Provision to Meet Projected Future Demand

Club Current Position Likely impact of Growth Issues to address

Market

Bosworth

RFC

2.5 capacity match play.

Overplay 2 taking into account

all activity (training pitch -3)

Potential 1 match equivalent

(plus 1 match equivalent

training. Overplay would

increase marginally

Ongoing maintenance

improvements (capacity of 2 on each

pitch would be sufficient to meet

current demand. Further

improvement on one or two

additional pitches required to

accommodate future demand)

Drainage improvements

Potential to relocate training to AGP

to reduce pressures on grass pitch



Provide floodlights for second pitch

if training is not relocated

Hinckley RFC

2 capacity match play only.

Overplay taking into account all

activity -5). Floodlit pitches

overplayed 2.5 each)

Club seeking to retain playing

teams and increase numbers -

no impact in terms of match

equivalents

Maintenance restricts capacity,

particularly on pitches 3 and 4 -

potential to invest further to increase

this

Drainage also requires improvement

to enhance capacity – drainage

recently installed on some pitches

but not effective – under review

Clubhouse / changing room believed

to be restricting club growth (club

indicate 8 rooms required – one for

each pitch) although not all pitches

appear to be used at one time.

Shower / toilet facilities also

limitedCapacity of 3 on each pitch

needed to meet all demand (and

club growth may see this increase

further (club indicate 8 rooms

required). Unless this is achieved,

pitches are not effective to meet

training and a 3G pitch may offer a

potential solution

Burbage RFC

Spare capacity 0.5 match play

only. Site also sufficient to

accommodate training (supply

would equal demand) during

summer months with light

nights. Lack of floodlights

means club travel off site in

winter.

Club seeking further growth of

0.5 match equivalents longer

term. Existing site only contains

one pitch, meaning that if this

team played at peak time

pitches would need to be

staggered. Pitch could however

accommodate additional play

if no training was undertaken

on site.

Short term lease (expires 2022).

Potential opportunity to extend

linking with other improvements

Opportunity to improve capacity of

pitch to ensure that more play could

be accommodated.

Lack of floodlights impact on

capacity of other pitches as well as

causing displacement of Burbage

RFC for training. Maintenance

improvements would need to be

undertaken if training was to be

accommodated on site.

Lack of clubhouse / impending

improvements to changing facilities

Dog fouling as site is public

recreation ground

Lack of opportunity for expansion at



peak time


9.30 There are no confirmed changes to provision however plans are underway to improve the changing

and pavilion accommodation at Burbage RUFC. The rugby club currently has a short lease left on

this site and it is hoped that the opportunity to increase the lease at the same time as facility

improvements are made will be taken should changing facilities be improved to RFU specifications.

It is important that these facilities are made to RFU specifications to ensure that they remain fit for

purpose to host the rugby club.

The RFU AGP Strategy (2015)

9.31 The RFU Council has recently approved a strategy to invest in Artificial Grass Pitches (AGP) which

will see 100 artificial, floodlit pitches installed across the country over a four-year period. The

strategy will see the creation of;

60 AGPs on rugby club sites to be used by the host club and other local clubs; and

40 on community sites with a guaranteed number of hours for use by rugby.

9.32 The key drivers for this are to sustain and grow participation while addressing the increasing

pressure on natural turf pitches, changing player expectations, competition from other sports

investing in artificial pitches and changing weather conditions.

9.33 While this scheme has been approved at RFU Board level, it has currently been put on hold and it is

unknown how / if it will be taken forward.

9.34 Although the scheme is currently on hold, there may be opportunities in future years within

Hinckley and Bosworth. Both Hinckley RFC and Market Bosworth RFC currently have overplay

caused by use of facilities for training, while Burbage RFC do not have any appropriate training

facilities. The strategy may provide opportunities for the development of a Rugby Compliant 3g

AGP, although it should be noted that others have been developed nearby (including Leicester

Forest East) as part of this scheme and usage and programming of these sites would need to be

considered as part of decision making in relation to viability. The 3g pitch at Leicester Road is

currently hardly used (but is very close to Hinckley RFC and indeed access is via the rugby club and

this should be considered as part of the future decision making process.


Key Issues and Summary

Summary - Rugby Union

Maintenance improvements at all three sites would increase capacity and ensure the longevity of

pitches. The quality of facilities has recently improved following a particular focus on maintenance.

There are also drainage concerns at both Market Bosworth RFC and Hinckley RFC that need to be

addressed

All club bases are heavily used when taking into account training. There is a need to consider the

provision of extra floodlighting (Market Bosworth RFC and Burbage RFC) and / or access to a 3g

World Rugby Compliant AGP (Hinckley RFC)

The clubhouse at Hinckley RFC is believed to be restricting growth and there is a need to ensure

that planned changes to the pavilion at Burbage RFC meet the needs of the rugby club

The remaining lease at Burbage RFC expires in 2022 and is therefore short - security of tenure is

therefore a concern


141

Introduction

10.1 This section assesses the adequacy of pitches for football in Hinckley and Bosworth. It includes;

a brief overview of the supply and demand for football;

an understanding of activity at individual sites;

a picture of the adequacy of current provision; and

the future picture of provision for football.

Football in Hinckley and Bosworth – An Overview

Pitch Supply

10.2 There are 123 individual formal grass football pitches currently available for community use across

Hinckley and Bosworth. Table 10.1 summarises the breakdown of pitch sizes. Site specific detail is

provided in the appendices.

10.3 Pitch totals should also be considered approximate only, as on many sites, layouts change weekly in

response to league fixtures.

10.4 It should be noted that pitches and teams within this section are categorised according to pitch size

requirements (ie teams in U17 and U18 age groups use adult pitches). This differs slightly from the

categorisation methods used in FA affiliation data, which considers U17 and U18 teams to be

juniors.

Table 10.1: Football Pitches across Hinckley and Bosworth

Pitch Type

Recommended

Pitch Dimensions

(including run off)

Pitches

Available to

the

Community

(Used or not

used)

% of Total

Pitch

provision

Pitches on

School

sites

Percentage of

Pitches on

School Sites

Adult

Football

(aged 16+)

106 x 70 m 28 23% 5 18%

Junior

Football

(age U13 -

U16)

88/97 x 56/61 m 24 20% 13 54%

9 v 9 (age

U11 and

U12)

79 x 52 m 24 20% 14 58%

7 v 7 (age

U9 and

U10)

61 x 43 m 27 22% 12 44%

5 v 5 (age

U7 and U8) 43 x 33 m 20 16% 5 25%

Total 123 100%


10.5 Table 10.1 reveals that; of the pitches that are currently available for community use; 23% of pitches

are full sized grass pitches while the remainder cater for younger teams (although some of the

pitches classified as adult and youth are interchangeable). The number of pitches accommodating

each age group is broadly similar.

Unsecured Pitches

10.6 While currently available for use, football pitches at school sites are often considered unsecured,

particularly as schools with academy status have greater independence around the lettings of their

facilities.

10.7 40% of pitches that are available for community use in the Borough are located on school sites.

With all secondary schools in the Borough having academy status, the number of pitches managed

and maintained by the education sector highlights the importance of securing appropriate

agreements to maintain long term access to these facilities. This is particularly important for youth

and 9v9 pitches, where a greater proportion of the total number of pitches are on school sites.

10.8 While almost all of the secondary school sites in Hinckley and Bosworth Borough indicate their

facilities are available (and indeed some have a strong online advertising presence), it is considered

that these facilities offer a greater degree of insecurity as;

a. Many have policies in place that are reviewed annually or biannually

b. There is frequently no advertisement of facilities, despite schools indicating that they are

available

c. Some schools do not have specific booking / letting procedures in place, making it difficult

for clubs to access facilities

d. As independent bodies, academies are able to control their own facilities easily, and there are

no third parties involved (other than clubs) to input into letting policies and procedures, as

well as pricing models.

10.9 Added to this, there are risks involved with the provision of facilities on school sites without secure

agreements around pricing etc. Increasingly schools see facility hire as a commercial activity and

changes to the pricing structure can quickly eliminate potential community activity if clubs are

priced out of the market.

10.10 The text in this assessment report will consider the adequacy of supply taking into account varying

levels of access and security of this access.

10.11 The majority of primary schools are not open for community access but do have some playing

fields. Most of these are basic playing fields and are not marked out as formal pitches regularly and

therefore offer limited potential resources for the local community. There are however some

schools with fairly large playing fields and these may offer significant opportunities in areas where

there are pressures on existing facilities. Burbage Junior School is the only primary school that is

currently accommodating community use.

Closed / Potential Sites

10.12 There are no sites that can be considered to be completely redundant playing fields, although

several green spaces have previously contained formal playing pitches but do not currently do so.

These include Higham on the Hill Playing Field, Thornton Playing Field, Keats Playing Field (Earl

Shilton), Stamford Memorial Park and Bosworth Road Recreation Ground, Barlestone.


10.13 Pitches that are not operating as formal playing pitches this year are excluded from all calculations.

The loss of any of the playing fields listed in this section would therefore not impact upon the

figures outlined in this report, but would instead eliminate the potential to address deficiencies by

reinstating pitches rather than providing new. The future of these pitches and their potential role in

meeting current or projected demand will be considered within the strategy document.

3g AGPs

10.14 The FA now approves certain types of AGP for use in competitive fixtures (those listed on the FA

pitch register) and the FA National Football Facilities Strategy recognises the role that these

facilities play in the provision of facilities for football.

10.15 During the 2017 - 2018 season, there was just one full sized 3g pitch in the Borough located at

Leicester Road, Hinckley. This pitch was not listed on the FA pitch register (and therefore cannot be

used for competitive fixtures). Added to this, there are concerns about access to the pitch due to

ongoing issues relating to the ownership of and access to the site.

10.16 In addition, there are several smaller sized 3g pitches which supplement the stock of full size

facilities and provide training opportunities for local clubs, as well as a range of informal five a side

opportunities. These include pitches at Battling Brook Primary School, Bosworth Academy (indoor)

and Hinckley Club for Young People.

Distribution of Playing Fields

10.17 The majority of pitches are located within the Northern Parishes, with circa a third of pitches

provided in the Hinckley and Burbage urban area.

Ownership and Management

10.18 Chart 10.1 illustrates that ownership and management of pitches within Hinckley and Bosworth is

mixed. The education sector is the largest provider, managing 40% of pitches. 28% of pitches are

managed by clubs, while a further 20% are the responsibility of Parish Councils. This means that

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council have relatively limited control over the range, type and

quality of facilities provided.

10.19 While the amount of clubs managing their own facilities is positive, there remains a reliance upon

the public sector and schools to provide facilities. The FA National Strategy recognises the

challenges that this reliance brings and seeks to increase the number of asset owning clubs, as well

as to work closely with partners to improve the landscape for football.

10.20 The level of facilities managed by schools is a particularly key issue for the borough and highlights

the importance of securing long term access to school sites in order to maintain the level of

facilities are available to the community. The importance of these sites is clear later in this section,

where it is evident that many schools are providing homes for key football clubs.

10.21 The mix of providers can also present a challenge to users of football pitches in the Borough, with

this leading to inconsistencies in quality, pricing and booking policies.


Chart 10.1: Management of Playing Pitches (pitches available for community use only)

Views on the Pitch Stock across Hinckley and Bosworth

10.22 Chart 10.2 indicates that there are mixed views in relation to the overall pitch stock in the borough,

with a larger proportion of clubs indicating that they are unhappy with the pitch stock than are

satisfied.

Chart 10.2: Satisfaction with Pitch Provision

10.23 The key reasons given by those responding clubs that are dissatisfied are;

A perceived lack of pitches – these views are particularly apparent from large junior clubs

A perceived lack of 3g football pitches for both matches and training

The quality of pitches (and the impact that overuse has on pitch quality)

A lack of appropriate changing / welfare facilities for young people.

Management of Football Pitches across Hinckley and Bosworth

Ownership and Management Club HBC Schools Parish Council

Overall Satisfaction with Pitch Provision

Yes

No


10.24 Reflecting the issues raised in Chart 10.2, Chart 10.3 illustrates that there are a number of issues

that are perceived to impact club development. Many of these are directly related to the facilities

provided, specifically a lack of pitches and a lack of AGPs.

10.25 It was also noted that it is difficult to recruit and retain coaches and volunteers, which represents a

key challenge for the ongoing development of football in the borough. Costs associated with

playing, including pitch hire, travelling and securing funding for pitch improvements are also

believed to impact the growth of football in Hinckley and Bosworth.

Chart 10.3: Barriers to Club Development

Pitch Quality and Changing Accommodation

10.26 All local leagues running within the borough require (within their rules) clubs to keep their grounds

in playable condition (and deemed suitable by the Management Committee). Pitch quality is

therefore an essential component of an effective pitch stock. The presence and quality of changing

facilities can also be of significance in determining the suitability of pitches and a lack of facilities

can impact on the desirability of grounds for clubs, particularly where there is a lack of toilets as

well as changing facilities.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Nu

mb

er

of

Clu

bs

Issues Raised

Perceived Barriers to the Growth of Football


10.27 There are specific rules relating to pitch quality, changing accommodation and social facilities for

clubs participating in leagues at levels on the football pyramid and this will be returned to later.

10.28 To ensure that pitches meet league requirements, pitch quality and changing accommodation is

therefore as important as the number of pitches.

10.29 A number of different sources have been used to evaluate the quality of sites and these are

discussed in brief in the sections that follow. The overall quality of pitches and the issues that are to

be addressed is determined by the triangulation of data from all sources.

Site Visits

10.30 Site visits categorise almost all visits as standard. There are few pitches of very high quality and site

assessment scores range from 40% (just in the poor category) up to 90% (good). There are however

numerous pitches achieving scores in the lower echelons of the standard category (below 60%).

10.31 The average score achieved by pitches visited is 58%, which falls within the standard range. This is

based upon the appearance of pitches and the maintenance programme that has been undertaken.

This is a fairly low average score and suggests that if pitch quality deteriorates as the season

progresses, several sites may include pitches that become poor. This would cause an overall

reduction in capacity.

10.32 In addition to this, on site analysis of pitch quality demonstrated that the overall condition of

facilities is lower in many instances than the scores achieved suggest. This is attributed to the

maintenance schedules, which in some instances artificially inflate scores. This occurs particularly

when some out of season maintenance is undertaken, but limited in season maintenance takes

place and pitches therefore deteriorate (albeit not as quickly as they would otherwise have done).

On the whole however, it is clear that the maintenance undertaken across the borough is relatively

basic.

10.33 In general, with regards football pitch quality, site visits reveal that;

there were very few if any poor / unplayable pitches however there was evidence of

compaction, poor drainage and standing water on numerous pitches in the borough. The

issues with drainage and waterlogging may be caused (or exacerbated) by the compaction

that is evident;

there is evidence of undulation on many sites, and pitches would benefit from levelling to

improve the playing surface;

reflecting the relatively low levels of maintenance that are carried out on most sites, there are

issues with weed growth;

although many sites are open to the public (and indeed function as parks / recreational

facilities) little impact of the widespread informal access was evident at the time of site visits.

the condition of associated ancillary facilities varies and there are some sites where facilities

would benefit from improvement. Most facilities are of limited quality and are relatively basic.

10.34 Chart 10.4: summarises the issues identified through site visits, by illustrating the average score

achieved for each of the criteria evaluated.

Chart 10.4: Key Issues Arising from Site Visits

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

GrassCoverage

Size Slope Length ofGrass

Evenness DogFouling /Litter /Glass

UnofficialUse /

Damage tothe

Surface

Drainage

Average Quality Score achieved during site visits


10.35 There is very little variation on the quality of pitches according to provider, with average scores

achieved ranging only between 56% and 60%. This is illustrated in Table 10.2, which outlines the

average score achieved by pitches under each ownership.

Table 10.2: Average Quality Scores by Ownership / Management

Provider Average Quality Score %

Parish 57

School 58

Club 60

HBBC 56

Views on Pitch Quality

10.36 Chart 10.5 and 10.6 evaluate the user perception (club) of pitch quality. Figure 10.5 illustrates that

overall, the quality of pitches is perceived to be moving in the right direction, with the majority of

clubs indicating that the condition of facilities that they use has either remained static or improved

and only a small number of clubs believing that there has been a decline.

10.37 Interestingly, similar reasons were given by clubs evidencing both improvement or decline,

specifically;

Improved maintenance generating enhanced pitches / reducing maintenance creating poor

pitches

The installation of drainage improving pitch conditions / drainage continuing to impact pitch

quality and causing cancellations

Pitches benefitting from more limited use / Heavy usage impacting upon quality and causing

deterioration.


Chart 10.5: Trends in Pitch Quality

10.38 Chart 10.6 illustrates the club perceptions relating to quality of pitches and confirms many of the

findings of the site visits and other consultations (a score of 3 equates to good, 2 to average and 1

poor). It is clear that drainage and pitch evenness are considered particularly problematic by clubs,

reflecting the findings of site visits. Dog fouling is raised as a much greater concern than was

evident in the site visits.

Chart 10.6– Perceived Quality issues at football pitches in Hinckley and Bosworth

10.39 The specific issues raised in relation to quality reflect the overall findings of the site visits. It is

evident that whilst there are concerns raised by clubs using facilities in all ownership (and therefore

ownership is not a clear determinant of quality), there is greater negativity from junior clubs than

other consultees. It is at sites used by these clubs where overuse is believed to be at it’s highest and

pitches are therefore subjected to significant wear and tear.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Much Better Slightly Better No Difference Slightly Poorer Much Poorer

Nu

mb

er

of

Clu

bs

Perception of Quality

Perceived Trends in Pitch Quality

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Avera

ge Q

uality

Sco

re

Quality Criteria

Quality of Football Pitches in Hinckley and Bosworth


10.40 Quality issues and views specific to each site are outlined in the appendices and are also

summarised in Table 10.5 later in this section. Overall however the key messages arising from site

visits and consultation in relation to quality are;

across the borough in general, the quality of pitches is standard. Within the standard

categorisation however there are a range of facilities and many of the pitches are closer to

the poor categorisation than they are good. Any level of deterioration may therefore impact

and this will be returned to in the analysis;

maintenance schedules vary but in general, are relatively basic and little out of season

reinstatement takes place. This has a detrimental effect on both the immediate quality of the

pitch, but also the long term capacity of the pitch across the season and beyond. Many of

the issues arising (including drainage / evenness / worn goalmouths etc) could be addressed

through improved in and out of season maintenance;

while drainage emerges as a key issue, it is clear that in some instances, this is exacerbated

by heavy usage and the resulting compaction at the site. Waterlogging is responsible for the

majority of cancellations on pitches across the borough and this does not vary by ownership.

It is likely however that the drainage issues experienced are caused / exacerbated by the

compaction, which is associated with heavy usage and /or lack of maintenance.

the quality of changing provision is varied and there are some sites that would benefit from

improvement

pitch quality is perceived to be one of the key challenges facing the game and a key issue to

address if football is to continue to develop and grow. There is however a perception that

quality has started to improve following a focus on tailored maintenance schedules, however

it is felt that the amount of pitches provided needs to be better in line with demand if

pitches are to adequately meet demand. This links with the key issues experienced

(compaction) which can be generated by heavy usage).

Quality of AGPs

10.41 There is only one 3g pitch in the borough at the Leicester Road Stadium, Hinckley. This facility was

built in 2006 and has a dynamic base. It is starting to age although the overall quality of the facility

remains standard (supported by limited use). The pitch has not been tested and is therefore not

listed on The FA register for 3g pitches or approved for use for competitive fixtures. Recent visits

however suggest that refurbishment / replacement would be required if the facility was to be

added to the FA Pitch Register.


Demand

Current Participation – Match Play

10.42 Table 10.3 summarises the teams currently based in Hinckley and Bosworth. It reveals that in total,

there are 236 teams in total, including Inclusive and Futsal teams.

10.43 It demonstrates that just 24% of teams are senior teams, with the remainder being age group

teams. This broadly balances with the proportion of pitches that are full size, suggesting that the

pitch stock is well tailored to demand.

10.44 As noted earlier, pitches and teams within this section are categorised according to pitch size

requirements (ie teams in U17 and U18 age groups use adult pitches). This differs slightly from the

categorisation methods used in FA affiliation data, which considers U17 and U18 teams to be

juniors.

Table 10.3: Football Teams in Hinckley and Bosworth

Format of Football

Number

of

Teams

Proportion

of Teams

Football Adult Male (16-45yrs) 56 23.7%

Football Adult Female(16-45yrs) 2 0.8%

Football Youth Male(12-15yrs) 34 14.4%

Football Youth Female(12-15yrs) 3 1.3%

Football 9v9 Male (10 – 11 years) 31 13.1%

Football 9v9 Female 4 1.7%

7V7 (8 – 9 years) 55 23.3%

5v5 (6 – 7 years) 43 18.2%

Disability Teams 8 3.4%

Futsal 3

10.45 While there are strong participation rates for males, female football is less well established, with

3.8% of teams, which is slightly below the national average. Several girls do play within mixed

teams rather than in dedicated female. The inclusion of female teams within a club can place

additional pressures on a site, particularly with regards changing accommodation as there is a need

to ensure that separate facilities are available and this is something that clubs indicated was a

barrier to further growth of these teams.

10.46 Disability football is strong in the borough, reflecting strong engagement and support for disability

football in Leicestershire. There are 8 Inclusive teams primarily focused in Barwell, who primarily use

AGPs and indoor facilities for training and travel to central venues (often nationally) for matches.

There are also three futsal teams. Inclusive football is a big growth area in Leicestershire and it is

hoped that this will continue to be reflected across Hinckley and Bosworth in the coming years.


Displaced Demand

10.47 Included within the above totals, there are three teams that are currently displaced out of the

borough due to a perceived lack of appropriate facilities within Hinckley and Bosworth;

Hinckley AFC and Hinckley AFC U18 teams are displaced to Ibstock Miners Welfare. They

previously played at Heather St Johns FC but no longer have access to this facility. League

requirements dictate the grading of facility that must be used by the club and there are no

alternative venues within the borough. The club have secured use of this venue for the 2018 –

2019 season and are now the only users of the facility;

Groby Town Honey Badgers are displaced to Cedars Academy in Birstall due to challenges

securing facilities within their local area.

Club Structure and Participation Trends

10.48 The majority of junior and mini teams within Hinckley and Bosworth are based at a large club.

There are clubs in the majority of larger settlements and very few clubs with only a single or small

number of junior or mini teams.

10.49 In contrast, most teams playing adult football are single teams operating in isolation. There are

however several clubs offering opportunities for progression right through from mini, to junior and

adult age groups. These include Market Bosworth Town, Leicester Road, Hinckley AFC / Juniors,

Caterpillar FC, Desford FC, Groby Town and Greentowers FC. There are also issues with drop off,

with many players ceasing to play as they reach the upper echelons of junior leagues and do not

join / form adult football teams.

10.50 Consultation demonstrates that similar to the national picture, there has been a decline in

participation in adult football in recent years, although this appears to have levelled out slightly

and most clubs now believe that participation is static. In contrast, there is perceived to be strong

growth in the younger (mini) age groups and more clubs have experienced an increase in junior

participation than have seen decline.

10.51 As outlined in Chart 10.3, there are perceived to be several barriers to the growth and development

of football clubs in the borough, with facilities having an impact, as well as challenges securing

coaches and volunteers. It is particularly notable that the lack of 3g pitches in the borough restricts

the coaching courses that can be put on within Hinckley and Bosworth and means that any

volunteer wishing to undertake such training must travel elsewhere in Leicestershire. This may

impact upon the number of coaches that become qualified and the willingness of local residents to

engage with football.

Pyramid Clubs

10.52 There are several clubs playing in the Non League System. As a result of the standard of football

played, there are specific requirements that must be adhered to in relation to the facilities provided

at the home ground.

10.53 Table 10.4 summarises these clubs and highlights the ground grading requirements that must be

met. If clubs continue to progress up the pyramid, requirements and regulations for facilities that

clubs must adhere to will become more onerous.


Table 10.4: Pyramid Clubs

Club

League

Standard

Associated

Ground

Grading

Requirements

Current Location

Barlestone St Giles

Leicestershire

Senior

Football

League Step 7

Grade C Barlestone St Giles

Sports Club

Barwell FC

Evostick South

Premier

Division

Central Step 3

Category C Barwell Cricket and

Sports Club

Leicester Road

Midlands

Football

League

Division 1 Step 6

Category H Leicester Road

Stadium

AFC Hinckley

Midlands

Football

League

Division 1 Step 6

Category H Displaced – Ibstock

Miners Welfare

NKF Burbage

Midlands

Football

League

(recently

promoted to

Division 1) Step 6

Minimum Step 7

Ground Grading

Requirements

Bqrwell Cricket and

Sports Club

Desfprd FC

Leicestershire

Senior League

Premier

Division Step 7

Category H Sport in Desford

Ground grading specifications are available in full at

http://nav.thefa.com/sitecore/content/TheFA/Home/Leagues/NationalLeagueSystem/GroundGradin

g.

10.54 Issues identified at each site in relation to meeting these criteria will be evaluated later in this

section.

10.55 It should also be noted that in addition to the above teams that already require facilities to meet

ground grading criteria, Earl Shilton Albion FC have indicated that they are looking to progress into

the football pyramid. They currently play in the Leicestershire Senior League Division 1. If they

achieved promotion within this league into the Premier Division they would then be required to

meet baseline ground grading criteria.

Training Needs

10.56 Consultation demonstrates that clubs use a mixture of grass pitches and AGPs for training.

10.57 With only one 3g pitch in the Borough (the preferred surface for football training) clubs are forced

to make alternative arrangements. While many clubs use sand based AGPs midweek therefore,

there is also fairly extensive training on grass pitches on a Saturday morning, in particular by junior

http://nav.thefa.com/sitecore/content/TheFA/Home/Leagues/NationalLeagueSystem/GroundGrading

http://nav.thefa.com/sitecore/content/TheFA/Home/Leagues/NationalLeagueSystem/GroundGrading


clubs. Some teams playing within the football pyramid, who have access to floodlit pitches, also use

their own facilities for training.

10.58 Sites used for football training in Hinckley and Bosworth include;

3g AGP –Leicester Road, Alans Way Sports Field (small sized pitch). The indoor pitch at

Bosworth Academy is also used

Sand based AGP – Dixie Grammar, Bosworth Academy, Brookvale Learning Campus, Hinckley

Academy,

Grass – Barlestone St Giles FC, Caterpillar Pitches, Bosworth Academy, Weaver Springs, South

Charnwood School, Langdale Recreation Ground, Clarendon Park / Westfield Community

Colleg Dovecote Pavilion, Redmoor Academy, St Martins Academy, Sketchley Hill Recreation

Ground, Barwell Cricket and Social Club, Richmond Park, Brookvale Learning Campus,

Swallows Green.

10.59 There is also some evidence of teams travelling out of the borough to reach Brockington College

(Blaby District) and Newbridge High School, Coalville (North West Leicestershire), as well as to use

3G AGPs in Nuneaton. There is however a relatively limited stock of facilities in the local area.

10.60 The use of sand based AGPs and grass pitches is clearly caused by the lack of local access to 3G

pitches. FA targets seek to ensure that all teams have access to at least one hour of training on a 3g

pitch per week. Sand based surfaces are not considered conducive to good quality football, and the

use of grass pitches can have ramifications for pitch quality due to the increased level of use that

pitches are subjected to.

10.61 Surprisingly, club consultation demonstrates that a higher proportion of clubs are satisfied with the

facilities that are provided for training than are dissatisfied. 40% of clubs are however unhappy

(illustrated in Chart 10.7) and the key reasons given for dissatisfaction include;

A perceived lack of pitches – there are no local facilities for many clubs and there are no slots

available at desirable times on any facilities that do exist

With only 3g pitch in the borough, most clubs using AGPs are forced to train on sand based

facilities, which is inappropriate for football and does not meet FA requirements

The cost of pitch hire is a barrier to usage – clubs cannot afford to pay the prices that are

charged

On some sites, there is a lack of welfare facilities, which restricts the use of facilities.


Chart 10.7: Satisfaction with Training Facilities

10.62 Reflecting concerns about the access to 3g pitches in the borough, several clubs and schools raised

aspirations for a 3g pitch on their site including;

Hastings High School (Burbage)

Brookvale Learning Campus (Groby) c

South Charnwood High – planning permission for 3g AGP, FF funding decision due

December 2018. If approved, construction will commence Spring 2019

Bosworth Academy – currently undertaking feasibility study for 3G AGP

Market Bosworth School – seeking AGP

Hinckley Academy – looking to replace sand filled AGP with 3g

The William Bradford Academy - looking to replace sand filled AGP with 3g

Barwell FC (Kirby Road Barwell Cricket and Sports Club) – Southern Premier league (level 7)

Earl Shilton Albion (Stoneycroft Sports and Social Club) – Leicestershire Senior Football

League (premier division is step 7, club currently in division 1).

10.63 The need for additional 3g pitches will be considered later in this section.


Educational Demand

10.64 All secondary schools in Hinckley and Bosworth have their own playing fields. The majority of

primary schools also have some playing fields, although most do not mark them out as permanent

formal pitches.

10.65 There is fairly extensive use of school playing fields, with some large clubs based at school grounds

and several clubs using facilities for both training and matches. Schools are hiring out both AGPs

and grass pitches and using a variety of arrangements to do so. The following schools are currently

particularly important to community use;

Bosworth Academy

Brookvale Groby Learning Campus

Redmoor Academy

South Charnwood High School

10.66 While curricular use impacts on the overall ability to sustain community play, school use of grass

pitches has limited impact on peak time demand and the availability of pitches, as this largely takes

place midweek. Where pitches are used heavily at weekends however, this must be carefully

managed in order to maintain quality for curricular requirements.

10.67 Almost all secondary schools in the borough participate in interschool competitions, as well as

hosting PE lessons. School sites are therefore able to sustain fewer community games per week on

average than facilities owned and managed by other providers to protect against quality

deterioration.

Casual Demand

10.68 Many of the sites in Hinckley and Bosworth do function as parks / public recreational areas. While

limited evidence was found of this impacting pitch quality at the time of site visit, it was highlighted

as a key concern across the season by users, particularly with regards dog fouling.

10.69 While this recreational use is not necessarily extensive enough to reduce the capacity of pitches,

particularly during the winter months, it impacts upon the player experience on occasion and also

causes dissatisfaction with pitch users.

Other Issues

Cost and Consistency

10.70 The cost of facility hire and of participating in football in general emerged as a key issue for clubs.

Concerns were raised particularly with regards training. It is clear however that there a number of

pricing models running across the borough, directly reflecting the wide variety of providers of

pitches. These include long term leases, an overall fee for use of the whole site regardless of the

number of pitches, free of charge use in return for support in the maintenance process and

informal / ad hoc rental arrangements. The inconsistency in pricing can place greater pressures on

clubs who have to contact multiple providers in order to find an appropriate facility and also

generate insecurities around value for money.

10.71 While cost analysis did not demonstrate costs to be above expected levels, it is important that cost

sensitivities are noted, particularly as this would need to be taken into account in the creation of

any network of 3G pitches.


Benefits of hub sites

10.72 Many clubs highlight that the amount of pitches is a key issue across the borough and both the

quality and quantity of pitches is considered to be one of the key barriers to provision.

10.73 The growth in the size of clubs in the borough (particularly those with junior teams) means that

sites with capacity to deliver a high number of matches in one morning are becoming increasingly

desirable as clubs wish to focus all of their activity on one site as far as possible. Dispersal of teams

across multiple venues was one of the main concerns raised by clubs. As well as creating challenges

for parents, the desire to avoid multiple venues often forces clubs to overplay pitches on their main

sites. The dispersal of teams across multiple venues also reduces the club atmosphere and

therefore inhibits club development.

10.74 Several clubs reference the need for a network of high-quality facilities on hub sites, believing that

this is necessary in order to ensure that supply can meet demand. Clubs expect to see both good

quality (and sufficient pitches) and adequate welfare facilities in order that they can develop and

attract new players.

Adequacy of Pitch Provision – Assessing Supply and Demand information and Views

10.75 The Sport England Methodology enables evaluation of the adequacy of provision, taking into

account both the quality and number of pitches provided. Adequacy is measured both over the

course of a week and at peak time using the concept of match equivalents. There is a strong

interrelationship between the quality of a pitch and the amount of matches that it can sustain.

Weekly Capacity

10.76 The quality of the pitch has a greater influence on weekly capacity - this directly impacts the

number of matches that can be sustained. Table 10.5 summarises the guidelines used with regards

pitch capacity (extracted from Sport England Guidance on the Production of a Playing Pitch

Strategy, prepared by the FA).

Table 10.5: Capacity based upon Pitch Quality

10.77 The majority of sites in Hinckley and Bosworth were assessed as standard and capacity has

therefore been calculated as such. It should however be noted that many are close to becoming

poor (and do so after inclement weather and / or heavy use) and the average score achieved was

low overall. The impact of a reduction in the quality (ie standard pitches becoming poor) will be

considered in a scenario later in this section.

10.78 It should also be noted that at some sites, pitch provision changes weekly to ensure that supply is

matched with demand that weekend. This is particularly relevant at club sites and occurs at several

venues in the Borough. Pitch totals and associated capacity ratings are therefore indicative only.

Peak Time Demand

Agreed pitch quality rating Adult Football Youth Football Mini Soccer

Number of match equivalent sessions a week

Good 3 4 6

Standard 2 2 4

Poor 1 1 2


10.79 Peak time demand is determined by evaluating the number of match equivalents at peak time and

comparing it to the number of pitches available. Peak time is deemed to be the period in which the

most play on that pitch type takes place.

10.80 Pitches can only be considered to have spare capacity at peak time when they are not already

utilised to their full capacity over the course of a week. An adult pitch that is not used on a Sunday

morning (borough wide peak time), but is used more than three times per week at other times

(Saturday morning, Sunday afternoon and midweek for example) would not be considered able to

sustain additional play either at peak time, or at other times, even though no one would be using

the facility then, as this would be detrimental to the quality of the pitch.

10.81 In general, junior leagues have greater flexibility than adult leagues with regards kick off times, with

matches able to be staggered to ensure that all games can be accommodated. All adult leagues

have definitive start times.

10.82 The patterns of play for each type of football set out below clearly demonstrate that peak time is

very concentrated, with all forms of the game being a Sunday morning. This means that (excluding

training) almost all activity takes place at this time and there is little demand for facilities outside of

this peak period.

Senior Football – there is a much greater split in adult play than for other forms of the

game, with 45% of play taking place on a Sunday morning. Teams playing at a higher

standard, including those in the Non league Pyramid, kick off on a Saturday afternoon and

there is also some play on a Sunday afternoon. Ladies football in particular is played on a

Sunday afternoon, meaning that pitch requirements do not clash with those of senior male

teams.

Youth and 9v9 football – almost all youth and 9v9 football also takes place on a Sunday,

with most teams playing in the Foxes League and the Leicester and District Junior League.

Female teams play in the Leicester City and County Girls League, but this also takes place on

a Sunday morning. Junior teams playing at a higher standard (Midland Junior Premier

League) where there are some specific requirements in terms of the facilities that are

provided, kick off on a Saturday morning.

5v5 and 7v7 - like for youth and 9v9 teams, almost all teams play in the Leicester Mutual

Football League and play therefore takes place on a Sunday morning (with the opportunity

to stagger the fixtures).

10.83 The concentration of play on a Sunday morning increases the number of pitches required to

accommodate peak time demand but does in theory limit the demands on pitch quality, with most

facilities hosting the majority of their activity on a Sunday. The high level of training that takes place

on pitches however on a Saturday (as opposed to on 3g pitches) means that many pitches remain

under pressure to accommodate play on both a Saturday and a Sunday.

10.84 The focus of both adult and youth play on a Sunday morning means that different age groups wish

to use facilities at the same time, which places greater pressures on the management of sites to

ensure that child protection guidelines are followed. This is therefore an additional challenge for

the creation of an effective network of pitches in Hinckley and Bosworth.

Measuring Demand on AGPs


10.85 All competitive fixtures in the borough take place on grass pitches. The lack of AGPs on the 3g

pitch register means that there are no facilities that can be used to accommodate matches

currently.

10.86 The only 3g pitch in the Borough is at Leicester Road, and the usage of this pitch is currently

restricted due to access issues arising from dispute of ownership. The quality of the facility is also

limited and insufficient to pass the FA tests in its current form.

10.87 Primarily to take evaluate capacity and take up, the methodology indicates that the adequacy of

AGPs is measured through;

the amount of play that a site is able to sustain (based upon the number of hours that the

pitch is accessible to the community during peak periods up to a maximum of 34 hours per

week). Peak periods have been deemed to be Monday to Thursday 18:00 to 21:00; Friday

17:00 to 19:00 and Saturday and Sunday 09:00 to 17:00;

the amount of play that takes place (measured in hours);

whether there is any spare capacity at the site based upon a comparison between the

capacity of the site and the actual usage; and

any other key issues relating to the site which have arisen through consultation.

10.88 The Leicester Road site is not considered to be fully accessible to a wide range of clubs and is

therefore in practice not considered to be true capacity at this point in time. The site is therefore

not taken into account when evaluating the adequacy of provision to meet match play.

Grass Pitches - Situation at Individual Sites

10.89 Table 10.6 provides detail of the activity that takes place at each active site offering community use

in Hinckley and Bosworth. It sets out the current supply and demand and outlines whether the

pitch is being overplayed, played to the appropriate level or is able to sustain additional fixtures.

Any other issues arising with the site, including key quality concerns, are also briefly summarised.

10.90 Quality ratings are derived from a combination of site visits (where as an indication, sites achieving

a score of 50% - 80% are rated standard). Sites above this are considered good and below are rated

poor) as well as consultation. Site visit scores do not necessarily correlate directly with the rating

given, as club and provider feedback, as well as the overall impression at the time of the site visit is

also taken into account to produce a final rating. Site visit scores for example may be influenced by

a good (and therefore highly scoring) maintenance programme, but if this is ineffective due to

underlying issues, quality is reduced.

10.91 Issues will be explored by pitch type, however the key issues emerging from site overviews are as

follows;

The majority of pitches in the borough are able to sustain additional play across the week

when excluding any training activity. This is influenced by the strong focus on match play on

a Sunday morning, which reduces the amount of times that pitches are needed for

competitive play over the weekend. Training does however impact significantly at a

number of sites, with training activity almost doubling the level of usage the site

receives over the course of the week. In most instances, training causes overplay when

without it the pitch, would be within its weekly capacity. Grass is used for training by the

majority of clubs due to the lack of available 3G AGPs in the borough


When considering match play only, there is very little overplay evident, with only a small

amount of overplay at Westfield Community College (adjacent Clarendon Park) and Kirkby

Road (Desford). When taking into account the impact of training however, several more sites

suffer from overplay - South Charnwood High, Richmond Park, Redmoor Academy,

Dovecote Pavilion, Caterpillar Sports Ground, Brookvale Learning Campus and more pitches

on Westfield Community College. Kirkby Road is the only site where all pitches are

overplayed. Overplay in Hinckley and Bosworth is caused by a variety of things, including

high numbers of teams for the pitches provided and the need to balance curricular

requirements with community use. It is training on grass pitches however that exacerbates

this situation significantly.

While overplay is not necessarily directly responsible for the quality issues experienced on

grass pitches it is clear that the heavy usage (coupled with limited maintenance practices) is

contributing to the compaction that is currently experienced on many pitches across the

borough. This in turn results in drainage issues that further impact the quality of the site;

Added to the sites where overplay has been identified, 36 additional pitches that are either

played to the level that they can sustain or approaching this (only 0.5 match equivalents

remaining). This suggests that overall, reflecting the findings of consultation, supply is very

closely balanced with demand. Overplay and capacity pressures are generally associated

with larger pitches (9v9, youth and adult pitches) rather than 7v7 and 5v5;

There are a very small number of venues that receive limited community use. Hammonds

Park is one such example of this and this site continues to serve as an overspill venue.

Bosworth School, Dixie Grammar, Heath Lane School and Hinckley Academy are the only

other examples of sites where facilities are available but are not used;

Looking across the week, Weavers Spring Recreation Ground is the only site with pitches of

9v9 or larger where there are more than 2 match equivalents available. All other pitches with

greater than 2 match equivalents capacity are 5v5 or 7v7 pitches (which are able to sustain a

significantly higher number of games per week due to the lower levels of wear and tear

generated by young children)

While it is clear that is relatively limited capacity remaining during the week on larger

pitches, the high focus of activity at peak time therefore means that for the majority of

pitches, the ability to sustain multiple games across several weekend slots is of lower

importance than the availability at peak time. This means that the quality of the pitch

impacts less upon the capacity (as it is not necessarily needed more than once) but more on

the player experience.

Reflecting this, analysis of availability at peak time demonstrates that total spare capacity is

limited. Almost 50% of pitches have no remaining spare capacity at peak time and only

Bosworth School, Dixie Grammar, Dovecote Pavilion, Hammonds Park, Hinckley Academy

and Sketchley Hill Recreation Ground have any pitches with capacity to sustain more than 1

match equivalent additional at peak time.

10.92 It is clear therefore that calculations reflect the concerns of local stakeholders in football and

confirm that that there are particular pressures on junior and smaller sized pitches, but that spare

capacity is relatively limited across the Borough at a whole (and particularly at peak time).


10.93 While some sites do offer a degree of spare capacity, it is evident that most pressures are

associated with larger club bases, many of whom raised concerns about the adequacy of provision

during the consultation process. Sites where pressures are evident include;

Barlestone St Giles – almost no remaining spare capacity across the week (training)

Bosworth Academy – limited spare capacity at peak time

Brookvale Learning Campus – supply closely matched with demand

Caterpillar pitches – Almost no capacity at peak time and overplay evident

Westfield Community College - Almost no capacity at peak time and overplay evident

Dovecote Pavilion - Almost no capacity at peak time and overplay evident

Hastings High School – no capacity at peak time or across the week

Kirkby Road - no capacity at peak time and overplay evident

Richmond Park – no capacity at peak time and overplay across the week

South Charnwood High School – very little capacity across the week and only 0.5 match

equivalents at peak time

Stoke Golding – no spare capacity at peak time.

10.94 The pressures on the existing pitch stock are of even greater concern given that grass pitch quality

is approaching poor at a high number of sites.

10.95 It is also likely that the issues with compaction and drainage identified during the site visits can be

partially attributed to the heavy usage that pitches receive, with the maintenance levels being

insufficient to cope with the demand, meaning that pitches compact and drainage becomes

challenging. A reduction in capacity would have significant consequences for the adequacy of

provision.

10.96 The high number of pitches at Academy sites also represents a significant risk, particularly as these

facilities cannot be considered to be secured for the long term. The impact of both of these

scenarios resulting in a reduction in capacity will be considered later in this section.

10.97 The lack of training facilities exacerbates grass pitch issues further, causing extra wear and tear on

the pitches and in most cases, is directly responsible for the overplay that is evident.

.

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council: Playing Pitch Strategy Assessment Report

161

Table 10.6: Site Specific Usage at each site (community sites that are available regardless of whether they are used or not)

Site Name Location Number

of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time

Site Overview Summary

Alans Way

Sports Field

Newbold

Verdon

1 9v9 Standard 1 1 1 1 Compacted, good grass length but

evidence of weeds and scuffing.

Includes full ancillary facilities. No

concerns raised by clubs but site

visits clearly demonstrate that pitch

has deteriorated over season (and

pitches are now edging towards

lower standard quality). Presence of

a small sized AGP ensures that grass

pitches are not used for training.

There is capacity across the week on

all pitch sizes, but demand is high

for the 5v5 pitch at peak time. There

is however an ability to

accommodate additional play at

peak time on all other pitch sites.

1 7v7 Standard 1.5 2.5 2.5 0.5

1 5v5 Standard 2 2 2 0

1 youth

11v11

Standard 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Ashby Road

sports club

Hinckley 1 adult

11v11

Standard 1 1 1 1 Pitch in good condition with some

compaction. Second walking football

pitch not marked and very muddy.

Site has capacity to accommodate

additional play both across the week

and at peak time. There would also

be potential for further play at peak

time.

Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council: Playing Pitch Strategy Assessment Report 162


of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Barlestone St

Giles FC

Barlestone 1 adult

11v11

Standard 2 1 0 0 Weeds and compaction across the

site although pitches in adequate

condition overall. Two barriered

pitches available for use with

adequate ancillary provision. Site

suffers from regular drainage issues

and club struggle financially to

invest in improvements. Scope to

accommodate a small amount of

further play across the week when

considering competitive activity only,

but site is also used for training

which restricts the amount of spare

capacity that is available.

1 youth

11v11

Standard 2 0 0 0


Barwell

Academy

Barwell 1 7v7 Standard 2.5 1.5 1.5 0 School site used on a Sunday

morning. Standard quality but

unsecured access. Use for curricular

purposes as well as competitive

activity increases the level of use but

there remains spare capacity across

the week. Matches must however be

played consecutively at peak time if

there is to be sufficient provision.



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Barwell Sports

FC

Barwell 1 adult

11v11

Good 1.5 2 1.5 1 Floodlit pitch in good condition with

good ancillary provision. Capacity

rating of good means that pitch

provision is adequate to meet

current demand, even taking into

account the training that also takes

place. The use of the facility primarily

on a Saturday afternoon also means

that the pitch is available at peak

time, although it is questionnable

whether this would be available in

reality (although the site is used by

other clubs).

Bosworth

Academy

Desford 2 adult

11v11

Standard 2.5 1.5 1.5 0.5 Quality of facilities is adequate and

there are few complaints from clubs,

with overall a perception that

facilities are well maintained. Site is

fairly heavily used for competitive

activity and must also fulfill curricular

requirements. While pitches can

accommodate competitive activity

alone, when also considering the

amount of school based activity,

there is overplay on the 9v9 pitch.

Availability of pitches at peak time is

much lower, with only the adult and

5v5 pitches having spare capacity

without needing to stagger fixtures.

2 9v9 Standard 3.5 0.5 0.5 0

2 7v7 Standard 4.5 1.5 1.5 0

2 5v5 Standard 3 5 5 0.5



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Bosworth

School

Market

Bosworth

1 9v9 Standard 1 1 1 1 Pitches in reasonable condition with

some scuffing evident. No

community use at present means

that there is spare capacity across

the week and at peak time.

2 youth

11v11

Standard 2 2 2 2

Britannia

Park/Burbage

Park

Burbage 1 adult

11v11

Standard 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Pitches undulating and compacted

and new goals are also required. Site

assessments demonstrate that pitch

quality does not match level of

maintenance, but clubs are happy

with the facilities and believe that

they are improving. Further

investment is also planned for the

site. Pitches have capacity to

accommodate further play both at

peak time and across the week.

1 youth

11v11

Standard 0.5 1.5 1.5 1

Brookvale

Groby

Learning

Campus

Groby 1 adult

11v11

Standard 2 0 0 0 School site of standard quality

although changing facilities require

improvement (showers). Pitch quality

also perceived to be deteriorating

due to insufficient maintenance and

site suffers from poor drainage.

Pitches are approaching capacity at

peak time and on the larger pitches,

there is also little scope for

additional use across the week due

to the need to meet curricular

requirements as well as

2 youth

11v11

Standard 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

2 9v9 Standard 4.5 0.5 -0.5 0

4 7v7 Standard 10 9 6 1




of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


accommodate club based activity.

Burbage

Junior school

Burbage 1 7v7 Standard 2 3 2 1 Site used for club training as well as

curricular activity. Compact and

damp but in standard condition

overall. Pitch available for use at

peak time (due to current usage for

training only) and site can also

accommodate further activity across

the week. PItches are however only

available on an unsecure basis.

Caterpillar

Sports Ground

Desford 1 adult

11v11

Standard 3.5 0 -1.5 0 Pitch quality standard but club

believe it to be deteriorating due to

heavy usage. Pitches suffer from

poor drainage and are uneven with

limited grass cover in parts.

Changing facilities and clubhouse

available but insufficient for the

number of teams. Reflecting the

heavy usage, the adult and 9v9

pitches demonstrate overplay across

the week and there is almost no

remaining capacity at peak time. The

overplay is influenced by the use of

pitches for training too - without this

usage would be high but just within

the capacity of the pitches. High

levels of overuse were raised as a

key concern by the club

1 youth

11v11

Standard 2 1 0 0

1 9v9 Standard 3 0.5 -1 0

1 7v7 Standard 3 2.5 1 0




of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Clarendon

park (senior

pitches) and

Westfield

Community

College (youth

pitches).

Hinckley 2 adult

11v11

Poor 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Pitches in park with evidence of

compaction, skids, weeds and

scuffed goals. One pitch is already

poor quality and the remainder are

approaching this categorisation

(which would impact on capacity).

Site accommodates training as well

as matches and is also open to the

public for informal recreation. When

considering just competitive activity

the 9v9 pitch is overplayed and there

is little availability at peak time.

Taking into account the training that

takes place however, the youth pitch

is also overplayed and with the

exception of the adult pitch, there is

no remaining spare capacity at peak

time.

1 youth

11v11

Standard 3 0.5 -1 0

1 9v9 Standard 5 -0.5 -3 0


1 5v5 Standard 0.5 3.5 3.5 1

Colts Close Burbage 1 7v7 Standard 1 3 3 0 Pitch quality limited and

approaching poor categorisation as

site is wet, dipped, muddy and

compacted. Club currently happy

with facilities that are provided.

Capacity for further activity across

the week but no remaining

availability at peak time without

staggering fixtures.

Dixie Market 2 9v9 Standard 2 2 2 2 School site with unsecured use.

Accommodates curricular activity



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Grammar Bosworth 1 youth

11v11

Standard 1 1 1 1 only and so capacity is available

both at peak time and across the

week.

Dovecote

Pavilion

Barwell 2 5v5 Standard 2 6.5 6 1.5 Some compaction evident but

overall pitch quality is adequate.

Club highlight significant recent

improvement through investment in

aeration and sanding but still require

more machinery to improve pitch

condition. Drainage was also

recently improved. On pitch training

generates particular pressures and

causes overplay on 9v9 and youth

pitches and there is also no

remaining capacity on the 7v7 pitch.

This situation is mirrored at peak

time, where analysis demonstrates

that there is no further capacity

available. These pressures on pitches

were also raised as a concern by the

club


1 9v9 Standard 4 0 -2 0

1 youth

11v11

Standard 3 0.5 -1 0

1 adult

11v11

Standard 2 1 0 0

Hammonds

Park

HInckley 2 7v7 Standard 0 8 8 2 Pitches of low standard quality - dips

full of water at time of site visit and

clear drainage issues. There is no

existing community use meaning

that there is spare capacity both at

peak time and across the week. The

quality of facilities however restricts




of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


desirability of the site.

Hastings High

School

Burbage 1 adult

11v11

Poor 1 0 0 0 Site is of limited quality with weeds

and compaction evident and pitches

also suffer from dog fouling due to

open access to school venue. Poor

capacity on one pitch and other

pitches approaching this same level

means that the games that can be

played are minimal and despite fairly

restriced use, when taking into

account both competitive activity

and curricular requirements pitches

are therefore played to the level that

they can sustain. The use of the

facility for training places further

pressures on pitch provision

1 youth

11v11

Standard 2 0.5 0 0

1 9v9 Standard 2 0.5 0 0

Heath Lane

School

Earl Shilton 1 youth

11v11

Standard 1 1 1 1 Pitches compacted and uneven but

no community use of facilities means

that there is a degree of spare

capacity both midweek and at peak

time.


Hinckley

Academy and

JC VI form

Hinckley 1 9v9 Standard 1 1 1 1 Pitches compacted and uneven but

no community use of facilities means

that there is a degree of spare

capacity both midweek and at peak

time.

2 youth

11v11

Standard 2 2 2 2



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Hinckley Road

Recreation

Ground

Burbage 1 7v7 Standard 1 3 3 0 Pitch compacted and with evidence

of weeds, but in reasonable

condition for the time of season.

Capacity to accommodate additional

play across the week but played to

the level site can sustain at peak

time

Jubilee

Playing Field

Markfield 1 adult

11x11

Standard 1 1 1 1 Barriered pitch with evidence of mud

and compaction. Mud in the goals

and some evidence of moles close to

the pitch. Clubs however reveal that

pitch quality has improved recently

following investment and there are

now few cancellations. Site includes

full ancillary facilities. There is scope

to accommodate further play across

the week and use of the facility on a

Saturday PM rather than Sunday

peak time means that there is also

further spare capacity available.

Kirkby Road Desford 2 adult

11v11

Standard (but

quality of one

pitch is

approaching

good (79%)

while other is

much lower

(60%)

4.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 Pitch quality impacted by heavy use

- there is overplay across the week

and no remaining capacity at peak

time. Evidence of undulation,

compaction and weeds and burnt in

lines may also cause injury. Site

contains small pavilion with

changing facilities.



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Langdale Park Hinckley 1 adult

11v11

Standard 1.5 1 0.5 0 Pitch in public park that is

undulating, compacted and

squelchy. Goals are dipped and

weeds are evident meaning that

pitch is approaching poor quality.

Calculations demonstrate a small

amount of spare capacity across the

week but no remaining scope for

further play at peak time.

Leicester Road

Stadium

Hinckley 1 adult

11v11

Standard 2 1 0 0 Pitch containing stadium seating and

turnstile as well as barriers and

floodlighting. Usage for training as

well as matches restricts spare

capacity and there is no remaining

scope for additional play at peak

time when taking into account all

activity. Smaller sized pitches are less

heavily used and can accommodate

further play across the week and at

peak time. Main pitch was subject of

significant improvemnets recently

1 youth

11v11

Standard 1 1 1 1

1 9v9 Standard 0.5 1.5 1.5 1

Market

Bosworth

Sports Club

Market

Bosworth

1 youth

11v11

Standard 1.5 0.5 0.5 0 All pitches undulating with

compaction and weeds, despite

recent investment in drainage (2013)

and club indicates that drainage

remains a key issue although pitches

have improved. Changing facility

also recently renovated (2015) with

1 7v7 Standard 1.5 2.5 2.5 0

1 9v9 Standard 1 1 1 0.5



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


1 adult

11v11

Standard 2 0 0 0 support from FA. Pitches heavily

used and no remaining spare

capacity at peak time for most age

groups. There is also very little

remaining additional capacity across

the week

1 5v5 Standard 1 3 3 0.5

Old Colliery

Ground

Bagworth 1 adult

11v11

Standard 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.5 Lots of weeds and pitch is wet

underfoot. Site also does not include

changing accommodation. Limited

quality but use by only one team

means that there is spare capacity

both across the week and at peak

time

Old Quarry PF Groby 1 9v9 Poor 1 0 0 0 Lines faint and difficult to make out

and pitch compacted. It is damp

underfoot but good grass coverage.

Located adjacent to new floodlit

facility that has tarmac surfacing and

tarmac car park. Spare capacity both

across the week and at peak time

due to use by only one team

Ratby Sports

Club

Ratby 1 7v7 Standard 1 3 3 0 Large site with clubhouse. Pitch one

has dug outs and pitch 2 is also

floodlit. The whole site is wet and

muddy underfoot and the club

highlight this to be a significant

issue, with multiple games cancelled

during the winter months. A small

1 adult

11v11

Standard 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

1 9v9 Standard 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.5



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


1 youth

11v11

Standard 1 1 1 0 amount of spare capacity available

on most pitches both across the

week and at peak time, but this is

impacted by the pitches being

unplayable for weeks on end, which

then means that fixtures must be

tightly packed in.

1 5v5 Standard 0.5 3.5 3.5 0.5

Redmoor

Academy

Hinckley 2 7v7 Standard 2.5 6.5 5.5 0.5 Pitches impacted by use during the

summer months for athletics etc. Site

is very boggy during the winter.

Changing accommodation has

recently been updated. There is no

spare capacity at peak time and the

youth pitch is overplayed when also

taking into account curricular

activity.

1 youth

11v11

Standard 3 0 -1 0


Richmond

Park

HInckley 1 youth

11v11

Standard 2 0.5 0 0 Pitches compacted and full of weeds,

showing drainage issues on some

pitches despite drainage being

installed recently and some pitches

are now unfit to play. Some

thatching of grass and weeds, club

indicate reseeding has been

undertaken. Pitches very heavily

used when taking into account all

activity and training on site

generates overplay. There is no

remaining capacity at peak time on

any pitch and the club highlight a

1 9v9 Standard 5 0 -3 0

1 7v7 Standard 5.5 2 -1.5 0

1 5v5 Standard 4 1.5 0 0

1 adult

11v11

Standard 0.5 1.5 1.5 0



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


lack of quality pitches as a key

concern.

Sketchley Hill

Recreation

Ground (Tilton

Road Sports

Ground)

Burbage 4 5v5 Standard 4.5 13.5 11.5 2 Pitches on large recreation area,

surrounded by residential properties

and with a play area in one corner.

Lots of undulation and compaction.

Lack of changing / welfare facilities

raised as a key concern by the club.

Capacity for further play across the

week on the site although availability

is more pressurised at peak time.

Site also accommodates training

which places greater pressures on

pitch quality


South

Charnwood

High School

Markfield 2 7v7 Standard 4 6 4 0 Pitches heavily used for both

matches and training as well as for

curricular use. As a consequence

there is no remaining capacity at

peak time and pitches are used to

the level that they can sustain / are

overplayed. Reflecting the heavy use

there is evidence of compaction and

scuffing. There are also issues with

dog fouling and litter and the club

feel that pitches do not receive

enough maintenance for the level of

play on site. There are also no

changing facilities associated with

1 9v9 Standard 2 0.5 0 0

2 youth

11v11

Standard 4 1 0 0

1 adult

11v11

Standard 2.5 0 -0.5 0

1 5v5 Standard 1 3.5 3 0.5



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


the grass pitches.

Sport in

Desford

Desford 1 adult

11v11

Good 2.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Pitch is compacted, some weeds and

damp dug outs barrier but tired and

needs updating. Site has recently

had drainage installed and been

levelled and this has improved

significantly although changing

facilities still require improvement.

The club also highlight a lack of

floodlighting as impacting on

development. Although the pitch is

heavily used, the strong quality of

the site means that there is a small

amount of spare capacity across the

week and at peak time.

St Martins

Academy

Stoke

Golding

2 9v9 Standard 4 1.5 0 0 Pitches cut up, compacted and

uneven due to requirement to

accommodate curricular activity as

well as competive games and

training. There is no remaining

capacity a on the 9v9 pitch and very

little on the youth team facilities.

1 youth

11v11

Standard 1 1 1 1

Stoke Golding Stoke

Golding

1 5v5 Standard 1 3 3 0 Pitches wet and suffer from drainage

issues. Some weeds also evident on

site and pitches are uneven. Dog

fouling issues are also experienced.

There are insufficient changing

1 youth

11v11

Standard 1.5 0.5 0.5 0



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


1 7v7 Standard 1 3 3 0 rooms for the number of teams

using the site. Although there is a

small amount of spare capacity

across the week, pitches are full at

peak time and the club struggle to

accommodate all fixtures, with some

displacement to St Martins School

Stoneycroft

Sport and

Social

Earl Shilton 1 adult

11v11

Standard 1.5 0.5 0.5 0 Pitch compacted and although dry at

the time of site visits, suffers from

drainage with many fixture

cancellations. Scope for small

amount of additional play across the

week but no remaining availability at

peak time.

Swallows

Green

Hinckley 1 7v7 Standard 2 3 2 0 Some evidence of undulation and

scuffing. Scope to accommodate

additional play across the week but

the majority of activity is focused at

peak time and there is little

remaining spare capacity as a result.


Weavers

Spring Rec

Earl Shilton 3 adult

11v11

Standard 3 4 3 1 Pitches compacted with lots of

weeds. Site also suffers from dog

fouling and litter. Maintenance is

perceived to be improving. Small

amount of spare capacity both

across the week and at peak times.



of

Pitches

Pitch

Type

Quality

Rating

Total

Match

Equivalents

Adequacy

of Provision

(Match

Equivalents)

Adequacy

of

Provision

Plus

Training

(ME)

ME

at

Peak

Time


Witherley

United

Witherley 1 adult

11v11

Standard 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.5 Pitch has burnt in lines and is a bit of

a trip hazard, some skids and dip in

the goal, and muddy wet underfoot,

uneven and undulating. Able to

accommodate small amount of

additional play both across the week

and at peak time.


Current Picture

10.98 The site overviews set out in Table 10.6 provides an understanding of the issues regarding the

adequacy of pitch provision across Hinckley and Bosworth and the situation at individual sites.

Table 10.7 - check summarises this further, providing an overview of spare capacity across the week

(taking into account all activity) and at peak time.

10.99 The key used in this table is set out below.

Site overplayed in this age group

Site played to level it can sustain

Site has potential to accommodate more play but is not currently used

Potential to accommodate more play - and used already for play

X No available capacity at peak time

Table 10.7: Summary of Site and Pitch Availability at Peak Time

Site Name Adult Youth 9v9 7v7 5v5

Alans Way Sports Field x

Ashby Road sports club

Barlestone St Giles FC X x

Barwell Academy X

Barwell Sports FC

Bosworth Academy x X

Bosworth School

Britannia Park/Burbage Park

Brookvale Groby Learning Campus X x x

Burbage Junior School

Caterpillar Sports Ground X x x X

Clarendon Park x x X

Westfield Community College

Colts Close X

Dixie Grammar

Dovecote Pavilion x x X

Hammonds Park

Hastings High School X x x

Heath Lane School


Site Name Adult Youth 9v9 7v7 5v5

Hinckley Academy and JC VI form X

Hinckley Road Recreation Ground X

Jubilee Playing Field

Kirkby Road X

Langdale Park X

Leicester Road Stadium X

Market Bosworth Sports Club X x X

Old Colliery Ground

Old Quarry PF x

Ratby Sports club x X

Redmoor Academy x x

Richmond Park / Hinckley Club for Young People X x x X x

Sketchley Hill Recreation Ground (Tilton Road Sports

Ground) X

South Charnwood High School X x x X

Sport in Desford

St Martins Academy x

Stoke Golding x X

Stoneycroft Sport and Social

Swallow Green X

Weavers Spring Recreation Ground

Witherley United

10.100 Issues can be further evaluated looking first at the adequacy of provision for each type of pitch,

as well as exploring localised issues in the two sub areas and more specifically in key settlements.

10.101 The key issues arising are summarised in the sections that follow and the overarching issues

identified are pulled together in a summary table.

Adult Football Pitches (11v11)

10.102 Table 10.8 overleaf summarises the usage at full size grass football pitches. Peak time analysis

reflects the peak time for adult football (Sunday morning). As outlined previously however, adult

play is spread much more equitably across the week than other forms of the game so although

Sunday morning remains peak time, there is much greater levels of usage outside of this period

(particularly Saturday afternoon, when all of the teams playing at a higher level participate).


Table 10.8: Full Sized Football Pitches


10.103 Table 10.8 reveals that there is some spare capacity in the existing stock of adult pitches across

the borough. The key issues arising from the Table are;

Taking into account overplay, across the week, there are 25 match equivalents available on

adult pitches. When also considering the impact of school and other use (for example

training) this reduces to 13 match equivalents. Peak time capacity is compromised even

further to 7.5 at peak time. This suggests that while provision is sufficient to meet demand

from adult football teams at the current time, the amount of spare capacity is relatively low.

There are 12 sites that do not have any remaining capacity at peak time on adult pitches.

These are Barlestone St Giles FC, Brookvale Groby Learning Campus, Caterpillar Sports

Ground, Dovecote Pavilion, Hastings High School, Kirkby Road, Langdale Park, Leicester Road

Stadium, Market Bosworth Sports Club, Richmond Park, South Charnwood High School and

Stoneycroft Sports and Social. Many of these sites are also similarly busy for other forms of

the game at the same time.

Reflecting how tightly supply and demand is balanced, there are no sites with spare capacity

greater than 1 match equivalent at peak time. One of the pitches with spare capacity at peak

time is Barwell Sports Club – this is one of the teams playing at higher levels in the league

structure;

Although spare capacity is limited, there is relatively little overplay evident with Kirby Road

being the only site where overplay is evident from the level of competitive activity only.

When taking into account curricular usage and / or training, South Charnwood High School

and Caterpillar Sports Ground are also overplayed.

10.104 It is therefore clear that for adult pitches, when taking into account all facilities available, there are

currently just sufficient sites. There are some sites however when supply is more closely matched

with demand and there are no sites with extensive spare capacity.

10.105 It should however be noted that the greater spread of demand across the weekend means that

the quality of pitches is of greater importance than if all teams were playing at the same time.

Some pitches may be required to sustain matches on both Saturdays and Sundays and this can

place significant pressures on facilities if appropriate maintenance practices are not implemented.

10.106 While training on site places greater pressures on some pitches (and forces teams to train on a

Saturday morning rather than midweek) in the majority of cases it is not placing adult pitches

above capacity. There is also more limited demand for training facilities from adult teams, with

most single teams indicating that they do limited formal training.

Impact of none secured community use

10.107 Table 10.8 includes several football pitches on school sites which are considered unsecured. These

include Bosworth Academy, Brookvale Learning Complex, Hastings High School and South

Charnwood High School.

10.108 In total, these currently account for 3 match equivalents availability at peak time and 1 match

equivalent (including all activity and taking into account overplay at South Charnwood School)

across the week.

10.109 This means that excluding unsecured sites, there are enough pitches although available capacity

drops to 4.5 match equivalents at peak time and 12 match equivalents across the week.

10.110 There is however 2.5 competitive match equivalents that are taking place at these sites that would

need to be relocated. 2 of these take place at peak time, meaning that spare capacity would reduce


to 2 match equivalents. This suggests that unsecured venues are particularly important to the stock

of adult pitches in Hinckley and Bosworth and that there are insufficient facilities without them.

Youth Football

10.111 In reality, some sites are used by both adult teams and youth teams and there is little difference in

terms of the size of pitches. The usage of smaller youth pitches is however summarised in Table

10.9. It indicates that levels of spare capacity are similar to those for adult football pitches.


Table 10.9: Use of Youth Football Pitches


10.112 Table 10.9 reveals that across the week, there are 30.5 match equivalents available on youth

pitches. When taking into account curricular use of school sites and club training on competitive

facilities however this reduces significantly, with just 9.5 match equivalents available.

10.113 Although there is limited overplay, training on pitches is responsible for the overplay that does

arise, at Westfield College, Dovecote Pavilion and Redmoor Academy.

10.114 As there is capacity to sustain a small amount of additional play across the week there is also

some additional availability at peak time, with 10 match equivalents theoretically available. There

are however 11 venues where there is no further capacity at peak time. These are Barlestone St

Giles FC, Caterpillar Sports Ground, Westfield College,, Dovecote Pavilion, Hastings High School,

Market Bosworth Sports Club, Ratby Sports Club, Redmoor Academy, Richmond Park, South

Charnwood High School and Stoke Golding Recreation Ground.

10.115 While there is a degree of capacity for further play, this is relatively limited with only Bosworth

School and Hinckley Academy able to accommodate 2 match equivalents per week. Neither of

these venues are currently used by community clubs.

Unsecured Pitches

10.116 Table 10.9 reveals that there are 13 youth pitches located at school sites in Hinckley and

Bosworth. The issues surrounding access to school sites means that all of these could be

considered unsecured.

10.117 Youth pitches on school sites are heavily used by community teams, with Brookvale Learning

Campus, Hastings High School, Redmoor Academy and South Charnwood School all

accommodating youth teams. Training also takes place on grass pitches at three of the four sites

(with the only exception being Brookvale Learning College, where the sand based AGP is used for

training). In total, there are 4 match equivalents taking place each week on school sites (as well as 5

teams training).

10.118 Of the 10 match equivalents that are currently available at peak time, 7.5 of these are located at

school sites, leaving only 2.5 match equivalents should school sites no longer be available. 3.5

match equivalents would however need to be relocated at peak time meaning that there would

actually be insufficient availability to accommodate all of the demand.

10.119 Added to this, excluding unsecured sites, spare capacity equates to just 3 match equivalents

across the week (taking into account all activity and overplay). As there are four match equivalents

competitive activity at school sites (and further training on top of this) this suggests that there

would insufficient facilities should access to school sites be lost.

10.120 Pitches at school sites are therefore particularly important to the adequacy of youth pitches.

9 v 9 Pitches

10.121 Table 10.10 summarises the use at 9 v 9 football pitches. It reveals that across the week, spare

capacity equates to 29.5 match equivalents taking into account overplay. This however decreases to

3 match equivalents when taking into account all activity. Training and curricular activity causes

overplay at Brookvale Learning Campus, Caterpillar Sports Ground, Westfield Community College,

Dovecote Pavilion and Richmond Park.

10.122 There are 9 match equivalents available at peak time although Dixie Grammar School (currently

unused for community activity) is the only site where more than two match equivalents can be

accommodated). There is no remaining capacity at peak time at eleven sites, specifically Bosworth

Academy, Brookvale Groby Learning Campus, Caterpillar Sports Ground, Westfield Community


College, Dovecote Pavilion, Hastings High School, Old Quarry PF, Redmoor Academy, Richmond

Park, South Charnwood High School and St Martins Academy. These sites accommodate the

majority of larger clubs in the Borough and it is therefore clear that there is both overplay and

pressures at peak time at key sites.

10.123 Whilst there is a degree of spare capacity boroughwide therefore for 9v9 pitches, it is clear that

this is not necessarily in the right place to meet the demands of certain large clubs, where capacity

issues are evident.


Table 10.10: 9 v 9 Football Pitches


Impact of Unsecured Pitches

10.124 Like youth pitches, school sites are vital in providing 9v9 pitches for community teams. There are

a total of 9 pitches at school venues and this represents a significant challenge given the already

fine balance between supply and demand. In total these venues account for 5.5 match equivalents

of community competitive use and a further 7 teams also use grass pitches at these venues for

competitive activity.

10.125 While many of the unsecured venues are amongst the highest used sites, much of the spare

capacity available across the borough is also located at school venues, with 5 match equivalents

available at peak time and 5 match equivalents across the week taking into account all activity.

10.126 This means that when excluding the unsecured community use venues, availability at peak time

equates to only 4 match equivalents across the borough. There would also be a need to relocate

the 5.5 match equivalents currently using unsecured venues (all of which are at peak time) meaning

that there would be insufficient provision overall (-1.5 at peak time and -7.5 across the week).

10.127 There is therefore already limited capacity to sustain and grow 9v9 football (without overmarking

pitches on other sizes) in the borough, particularly if access to unsecured venues is lost.

7 v 7 Pitches

10.128 Table 10.11 summarises the use at 7 v 7 football pitches. It indicates that even when assuming

only one match takes place on the pitch at peak time (when in reality they can be easily staggered

due to shorter game times) there is sufficient provision to accommodate demand. Across the week,

reflecting the high capacity of 7v7 pitches, there are 79 match equivalents available, and 55 taking

into account all activity (including curricular activity and training). Richmond Park is the only site

where there is any overplay evident, even taking into account all activity. Peak time supply is

however much more reduced, with only 6 match equivalents available.

10.129 Like pitches for other forms of the game, there are several sites with no further capacity at peak

time (unless matches are staggered) and these include Barwell Academy, Bosworth Academy,

Caterpillar Sports Ground, Westfield Community College, Colts Close, Dovecote Pavilion, Hinckley

Road Recreation Ground, Market Bosworth Sports Club, Ratby Sports Club, Richmond Park,

Sketchley Hill Recreation Ground, South Charnwood High School, Stoke Golding Recreation Ground

and Swallows Green.

10.130 Hammonds Park is the only site where more than 2 match equivalents could be sustained at peak

time without staggering fixtures.

10.131 This suggests that on the whole while there is good availability of 7v7 pitches although there are

some constraints at peak time, again on sites where larger clubs are based.


Table 10.11: Use at 7 v 7 Football Pitches


Unsecured Pitches

10.132 There are six sites with unsecured access and eleven match equivalents take place on these sites.

All schools with 7v7 pitches are currently used by the community. Added to this, 14 teams train on

grass 7v7 pitches at school sites and Barwell Academy is used as a venue solely for training.

10.133 Excluding unsecured sites, there are 3.5 match equivalents available at peak time. If access to

unsecured sites was withdrawn however, there would be a need to relocate all 11 match equivalents

and supply would become insufficient at peak time unless games were staggered. Even if games

were staggered capacity would still be very restricted and in most venues insufficient.

5 v 5 pitches

10.134 Table 10.12 outlines the spare capacity that is available at 5 v 5 pitches. It reveals that like at 7v7

pitches, there is good availability across the week (60 match equivalents, reducing to 46.5 match

equivalents taking into account curricular activity and training).

10.135 At peak time, capacity is more limited although there is scope for further play, particularly if

matches are accommodated consecutively. Capacity is currently equivalent to 7.5 match

equivalents. There is no overplay evident on 5v5 pitches due to the level of play that can be

sustained. There are however five sites that do not have capacity for any further peak time activity

unless games are staggered. These include Alans Way Sports Field, Brookvale Learning Campus,

Richmond Park, Stoke Golding Recreation Ground and Swalllows Green. Again, these sites are all

venues used by large clubs.

Unsecured pitches

10.136 There is a lower level of reliance on unsecured venues for 5v5 pitches than some other forms of

football, with just Bosworth Academy, Brookvale Learning Campus and South Charnwood High

School providing pitches. These sites accommodate 10 teams (5 match equivalents) and all activity

takes place at peak time. Added to this, there are 7 teams training on grass pitches at unsecured

school sites.

10.137 Excluding unsecured sites, there are 6.5 match equivalents available at peak time. If access to

unsecured sites was withdrawn, there would be a need to relocate 5 match equivalents, suggesting

that supply would be very closely matched with demand (although it would be possible to stagger

fixtures). There would remain sufficient capacity across the week to accommodate the relocated

teams.

10.138 It is clear therefore that while not as critical as for some other types of pitch, the loss of access to

unsecured venues for 5v5 football would have significant implications for the adequacy of

provision.


Table 10.12: 5 v 5 Pitches


Adequacy of Provision for Pyramid Clubs

10.139 As outlined earlier in this section, there are six clubs that are playing within the National League

pyramid and that therefore have specific requirements to adhere to with regards facilities. The

adequacy of provision for these clubs is summarised in Table 10.13. All clubs currently meet

baseline specifications, although it should be noted that the quality of facilities is poor in

comparison to some other clubs playing at the same level. The facilities used by AFC Hinckley are

also located outside the borough and therefore although they meet with league requirements, they

are not the clubs preferred venue.

Table 10.13: Adequacy of Facilities for Pyramid Clubs

Club

Current Location Quality Issues identified, and any

improvements required to meet

league specifications

Barlestone St Giles

Barlestone St Giles Sports

Club

Site suffers from weeds and compaction

as well as regular drainage issues. Club

struggle financially to invest in

improvements although facilities are

adequate to meet league requirements

at the current time. Use of facility for

training adds to capacity issues and

pressures on pitch quality.

Barwell FC / NKF Burbage

Barwell Cricket and

Sports Club

Site leased (until 2045) and changing

rooms were refurbished in 2010. Pitch

quality good overall and meets club

needs although the club raise concerns

about access to adequate training

facilities. Club keen to consider potential

AGP on site to facilitate training and

matches and integrate more with the

community. Some concerns raised by

other clubs hiring facility in relation to

drainage.

Leicester Road

Leicester Road Stadium No known issues with adequacy of

provision to meet league requirements.

AFC Hinckley

Displaced – Ibstock

Miners Welfare

Club currently displaced out of the

Borough. Club looking for new facility

within the Borough (or access to existing

facility of appropriate standard and at

the required times). Facility must be

meet with Ground Grading H

requirements.

Desford FC

Sport in Desford Pitch is compacted. Drainage has

recently been installed and has

improved significantly, but changing

facilities still require improvement. Club

also highlight needs for floodlights to

enable ongoing development.

Overall Spatial Picture

10.140 Overall therefore, analysis has demonstrated that supply in the Borough is very closely balanced

with demand both across the week and at peak time. This situation is particularly apparent for


youth, 9v9 and 7v7 pitches, but even for adult and 5v5 pitches, the amount of spare capacity is

relatively limited.

10.141 Although capacity is closely matched with demand, there is relatively minimal overplay in the

borough. Where this exists, (with a few exceptions) this is caused by training on pitches as well as

competitive activity. Almost all overplay is caused by high numbers of teams based at key sites

(associated with large clubs keen to avoid dispersion across multiple sites) and training.

10.142 Peak time demand is particularly constrained and there are very few sites able to accommodate

more than 1 match equivalent on any pitch at peak time and almost half of all pitches have no

remaining capacity at peak time. This means that particularly at club bases that already host high

quantities of activity, facilities are starting to inhibit participation. This is exacerbated by the high

concentration of demand at peak time, which is a Sunday morning for all forms of the game.

10.143 While there is some spare capacity, this is primarily at school sites that are available but where

there is no existing play. By and large, it is not in locations that can be used to address issues that

are experienced by clubs.

10.144 In addition to the capacity pressures that are experienced, quality issues are evident on sites

across the borough and many of these sites suffer from poor and limited maintenance regimes. In

particular there are issues with compaction (often caused by a combination of heavy use and

insufficient maintenance) which then leads on to concerns relating to drainage and undulation.

10.145 While on some sites capacity is constrained due to a requirement to accommodate play in several

time slots, for most sites, peak time demand is the only competitive use (excluding training) and

there is a lower emphasis on quality from a capacity perspective (although it impacts the user

perception).

10.146 Training does however contribute to these issues and as outlined, it is this practice that is

generating much of the overplay. Use of pitches for training contributes to heavier wear and tear

on the grass pitches and this doubles the amount of activity that pitches are required to sustain.

Clubs are forced to train on grass pitches and / or sand based AGPs due to a lack of 3G AGPs in the

Borough - Where clubs are able to access training facilities, these are of limited suitability and do

not foster a high quality training environment. Reflecting this, training was identified as a key

concern.

10.147 The reliance on school site is also a key concern, with several school sites functioning as

important venues for community clubs, including Brookvale Learning Campus, Redmoor Academy,

Bosworth Academy, St Martins Academy, South Charnwood High School and Hastings High School,

The reliance on school sites for competitive use further exacerbates the pressures that exist on the

pitch stock, and there would be insufficient pitches at peak time to accommodate youth, 9v9 and

7v7 play if access to school facilities was lost. Several school sites are important venues for

community sport and indeed some of the only spare capacity in the Borough exists at school sites

that are not used but are available (Dixie Grammar School, Hinckley Academy, Heath Lane Academy

and Bosworth School). The loss of community use to pitches owned and managed by the

education sector therefore represents a significant risk to the stock of facilities in the Borough.

10.148 Table 10.14 overleaf summarises the current supply and demand position across the local

authority. It also includes detail on the position was access to school sites lost. In this scenario, it is

assumed that all competitive activity that currently takes place on school sites would be relocated

elsewhere within the Borough.


Table 10.14: Summary of Pitch Availability (Match Equivalents)

Scenario

Adult Football Youth Football 9v9 Football 7v7 Football 5v5 Football

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Peak

Tim

e

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Peak

Tim

e

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Peak

Tim

e

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Peak

Tim

e)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Peak

Tim

e

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

All facilities 23 13 7.5 30.5 9.5 10 29.5 3 9 79 55 6 60 46.5

7.5

Excluding

School sites

18.5 9.5 2.5 8.5 -1 -1 2.5 -7.5 -1.5 44.5 23.5 -7.5 45.5 32.5 0.5

Comments

Overplay at Caterpillar Sports

ground, Kirkby Road and

South Charnwood High. Lots

of sites with no remaining

capacity at peak time

Overplay at Westfield

Community College,

Dovecote Pavilion, Redmoor

Academy. Limited spare

capacity at most club bases

Extensive overplay -

Bosworth Academy,

Brookvale Learning

Campus, Caterpillar Sports

Ground, Westfield

Community College,

Richmond Park, Dovecote

Pavilion. No spare capacity

at almost all club bases

Overplay at Richmond Park.

Very few sites with spare

capacity at peak time. Most

club bases have none

No overplay. Most sites have small

amount of capacity at peak time (and

could stagger fixtures)

10.149 Table 10.15 builds upon this, providing an outline of the adequacy of provision in each of the key settlements in the Borough. The figures

presented include all activity (competitive activity / curricular use and training). It indicates that there are capacity pressures in almost all

settlements with very little spare capacity in any town.


Table 10.15: Area Specific Issues Identified

Settlement Overall Adequacy of Provision (match equivalents) Specific Issues Identified

Hinckley Adult -3.5 match equivalents remaining capacity across the week,

1.5 at peak time

Youth – -1 match equivalent across the week (taking into account

overplay) and 3 match equivalents at peak time

9v9 – – 1.5 overplay across the week (taking into account overplay)

capacity for 3 match equivalents at peak time

7v7 – 16 match equivalents across the week (taking into account

overplay) and 2.5 available at peak time.

5v5 – 5.5 remaining capacity across the week, 1 match equivalent at

peak time.

Heavy use of parks influenced by training on grass pitches

Declining quality of parks pitches – several sites approaching poor – this would

reduce capacity further and generate overplay.

Issues with access to Leicester Road Stadium pitches mean that there is spare

capacity on these pitches

Limited spare capacity at parks and school sites

Several large clubs dispersed across multiple sites and at capacity. Key clubs

include Greentowers FC, Hinckley Town, Hinckley AFC

Displacement of Hinckley AFC seniors to Ibstock

At a site specific level;

Clarendon Park / Westfield Community College - Almost no capacity at peak time

and overplay evident. This is based upon standard categorisation for the majority

of pitches and most are heading towards a poor score which would reduce

capacity. Site accommodates training as well as match play which impacts

adequacy of provision significantly

Richmond Park – no capacity at peak time and overplay across the week – quality is

poor and there are drainage issues as well as compaction and weeds. Heavily used

by club but training generates overplay

Swallows Green -some compaction and scuffing and little remaining spare capacity

at peak time

There is also no spare capacity at Redmoor Academy.

Capacity to accommodate additional play at Ashby Road Sports Club although

there is some compaction. Scope to provide additional pitch also. There is also

scope for additional play at Hammonds Park as these pitches are not currently

used regularly (although they do accommodate overspill activity)



Leicester Road is the only 3g AGP and this is not fully accessible or suitable for use for

competitive activity.

Barwell Adult -1.5 match equivalents across the week, 1 available at peak

time

Youth – -1 overplay across the week, no capacity at peak time

9v9 – – -2 overplay across the week, no capacity at peak time.

7v7 – 1.5 match equivalents across the week (all activity) and 0

available at peak time.

5v5 – 6 match equivalents across the week (all activity) 1.5

remaining capacity at peak time without staggering fixtures

Provision under pressure, particularly for youth and 9v9 pitches and capacity is

particularly compromised at Dovecote Pavilion. Pressures are exacerbated by the

youth of all sites for training on grass pitches. On a site specific note;

Dovecote Pavilion – Accommodates key club. Almost no capacity at peak time and

overplay evident. Some compaction evident but overall pitch quality is adequate

although further machinery is required to support pitch improvements. On pitch

training generates the majority of overplay. Pressures also raised as concern by

club. Changing provision adequate

Unsecured access to Barwell Academy but remains a small amount of spare

capacity across the week, although no remaining capacity at peak time without

staggering fixtures

Barwell Sports FC – Pitch provision adequate to meet demand even taking into

account the training that also takes place due to quality.

Earl Shilton Adult -4.5 match equivalents across the week, 1 available at peak

time

Youth – -1 match equivalent available across the week, 1 match

equivalent capacity at peak time

9v9 – – -1 match equivalent available across the week, 1 match

equivalent capacity at peak time

No 7v7 or 5v5

Lack of large club in the area although Earl Shilton Albion have aspirations for

development of junior teams.

Spare capacity greater than in some areas although still remaining relatively

limited. Capacity is also limited by use of grass pitches for training at Weaver

Springs

Spare capacity at Weavers Spring both across the week and at peak time. Pitches

however compacted with lots of weeds

Stoneycroft Sports and Social Club heavily used – some issues with drainage and

no remaining spare capacity at peak time

No use of Heath Lane School for community activity – small amount of opportunity



on this site

Burbage Adult -0.5 match equivalents across the week, 0.5 available at peak

time

Youth – -1.5 overplay across the week, capacity for 1 match

equivalent at peak time

9v9 – – -no remaining spare capacity either across the week or at

peak time

7v7 – 10 match equivalents across the week (all activity) but only 1

available at peak time

5v5 – 11.5 match equivalents across the week (all activity) 2


Quality of facilities may start to impact capacity longer term. Some improvements

required across all sites to maintenance regimes as well as pitch quality. Recent FA

pitch improvement plans have been prepared and if followed should see

improvements to quality

Particular pressures across the week due to training on grass and some overplay is

also evident, particularly on youth and 9v9 pitches

Spare capacity at peak time also limited.


Hastings High School – of limited quality. Capacity inhibited by quality so poor

capacity on one pitch and other pitches approaching this same level despite fairly

restricted use, when taking into account both competitive activity and curricular

requirements pitches are therefore played to the level that they can sustain. The

use of the facility for training places further pressures on site. No capacity at peak

time or across the week

Capacity to accommodate further play at Britannia Park at peak time and across the

week. Needed investment planned into ancillary facilities and maintenance

specification would also benefit from improvement

Small facilities at Colts Close and Hinckley Road Recreation Ground, both

compacted and of limited quality. No remaining capacity across the week although

scope for further play at peak time

Sketchley Hill Recreation Ground (Tilton Road Sports Ground) demonstrates

undulation and compaction. Lack of changing / welfare facilities raised as a key

concern by the club. Capacity for further play across the week on the site although

availability is more pressurised at peak time. Site also accommodates training



which places greater pressures on pitch quality

Markfield Adult -0.5 match equivalents across the week (taking into account

overplay) and 1 match equivalent at peak time

Youth – -no remaining spare capacity

9v9 – – no remaining spare capacity

7v7 – 4 match equivalents across the week (all activity) but no

further capacity at peak time unless it fixtures are staggered

5v5 – 3 match equivalents across the week, 0.5 match equivalents

at peak time.

Very little spare capacity and a reliance upon South Charnwood School for both

training and matches (all on grass). Club are however comparatively small

Jubilee Playing Fields quality improving and scope to increase levels of play

South Charnwood High School – very little capacity across the week and only 0.5

match equivalents at peak time – influenced by use of facility for training. A 3g

pitch has recently been approved for this site and this will negate the use of the

grass pitches for training.

Groby Adult -no remaining spare capacity across the week or at peak time

Youth – -0.5 match equivalents across the week and 0.5 match


9v9 – – 0.5 overplay across the week, no capacity at peak time.

7v7 – 6 match equivalents across the week (all activity) and

1available at peak time.

5v5 – no remaining capacity across the week or at peak time

Majority of play concentrated at Brookvale Learning Campus due to club desire to

locate activity on one site. Sand based facility is also used for training and there is also

some use of the grass pitches. Large club.

Limited remaining demand both at peak time and across the week.


Brookvale Learning Campus – supply closely matched with demand and home to

large club. Pitch quality perceived to be deteriorating due to insufficient

maintenance and heavy use, and site suffers from poor drainage. Pitches are

approaching capacity at peak time and on the larger pitches, there is also little

scope for additional use across the week due to the need to meet curricular

requirements as well as accommodate club based activity.

Old Quarry Playing Fields – spare capacity across the week and at peak time, but

low quality facility that is damp underfoot and compacted.



Ratby Adult -0.5 match equivalents across the week and 0.5 match


Youth – 1 match equivalent across the week but no remaining

capacity at peak time

9v9 – 1.5 spare capacity across the week, 0.5 match equivalents at

peak time.

7v7 – 3 match equivalents across the week (all activity) but none at

peak time without staggering fixtures

5v5 – 3.5 spare capacity across the week, 0.5 match equivalents at

peak time.

Ratby Sports Club is the only provision in the area. Site is wet and muddy underfoot

and the club highlight this to be a significant issue, with multiple games cancelled

during the winter months. A small amount of spare capacity available on all pitches

both across the week and at peak time, but this is impacted by the pitches being

unplayable for weeks on end, which then means that fixtures must be tightly packed

in. Lack of training facilities further exacerbates poor levels of pitch provision

Barlestone No 5v5 or 9v9.

Adult – 0 match equivalents across the week (all activity) or at peak

time

Youth – 0 match equivalents across the week (all activity) or at peak

time

7v7 – 4 match equivalents across the week (all activity) and 1

available at peak time (2 if staggered)

Only one site in the area – club based facility that is used for both training and

matches.

Barlestone St Giles – Weeds and compaction across the site although pitches in

adequate condition overall. Two barriered pitches available for use with adequate

ancillary provision. Site suffers from regular drainage issues and club struggle

financially to invest in improvements. Scope to accommodate a small amount of

further play across the week when considering competitive activity only, but site is

also used for training which restricts the amount of spare capacity that is available and

means that there is no further capacity for youth or adult play.

Desford Some adult -pitches overplayed – -2 match equivalents across the

week, 15 available at peak time

Youth – -0 match equivalents available across the week, 0 match

All sites are heavily played. Quality is generally good but deteriorating due to heavy

usage and there is little scope for further play in the town

Caterpillar pitches – Almost no capacity at peak time and overplay evident. Pitch

quality believed to be deteriorating due to heavy usage. Heavy use for training




9v9 –overplay equivalent to -0.5, no remaining capacity at peak

time

7v7 – pitches heavily used - -1.5 match equivalents across the week

(all activity) and no remaining capacity at peak time without

staggering fixtures

5v5 – 9 match equivalents across the week (all activity) 1.5


exacerbates the overuse – without this pitch usage would be high but within

capacity of pitches. Club register concern about level of use. Changing facilities also

of limited quality

Kirkby Road - no capacity at peak time and overplay evident. Pitch quality

impacted by heavy use. Evidence of undulation, compaction and weeds and burnt

in lines may also cause injury.

Sport in Desford - Pitch is compacted, some weeds and damp dug outs barrier but

tired and needs updating. Site has recently had drainage installed and been

levelled and this has improved significantly although changing facilities still require

improvement. The club also highlight a lack of floodlighting as impacting on

development. Although the pitch is heavily used, the strong quality of the site

means that there is a small amount of spare capacity across the week and at peak

time.

Bosworth Academy – limited spare capacity at peak time and a degree of overplay

on the 9v9 pitch particularly

Newbold

Verdon

No adult provision

Youth – 0.5 match equivalents across the week (all activity) and 0.5


9v9 – 1 match equivalent across the week (all activity) and 1


7v7 – 2.5 match equivalents across the week (all activity) and 0.5


5v5 – 2 match equivalents across the week (all activity) but no


Alans Way Sports Field is the only site. It is compacted, good grass length but evidence

of weeds and scuffing. Includes full ancillary facilities. No concerns raised by clubs but

site visits clearly demonstrate that pitch has deteriorated over the course of the season

(and pitches are now edging towards lower standard quality). Presence of a small sized

AGP ensures that grass pitches are not used for training. There is capacity across the

week on all pitch sizes, but demand is high for the 5v5 pitch at peak time. There is

however an ability to accommodate additional play at peak time on all other pitch sites.

Bagworth and Adult – 1.5 match equivalents across the week (all activity) and 0.5 Old Colliery site in Bagworth is only functioning site. Only accommodates one team

but is limited in quality (weeds and drainage) and has no changing



Thornton available at peak time.

No provision of any other pitch types.

accommodation. Spare capacity at peak time and across the week.

Playing field site in Thornton not currently marked out as formal pitches. No

demand identified this season

Settlement currently located in close proximity to South Charnwood High School

(Markfield) which has very little capacity across the week and only 0.5 match

equivalents at peak time.

Market

Bosworth

Adult -1 match equivalent across the week, no spare capacity at

peak time

Youth – 2.5 match equivalents across the week and 3 match

equivalents available at peak time

9v9 – 4 spare capacity across the week, 3.5 match equivalents at

peak time.

7v7 – 2.5 match equivalents across the week (all activity) but none

at peak time without staggering fixtures

5v5 – 0.5 spare capacity across the week, 0.5 match equivalent at

peak time.

Degree of spare capacity in the town (greater than other areas) occurs due to lack

of use of facilities that are available at Dixie Grammar School and Market Bosworth

High School. The two sites that are used by clubs are approaching capacity

No training on grass pitches which maintains capacity for competitive fixtures, but

clubs are training on sand based AGP which is not desirable and / or the small

indoor training facility at Bosworth Academy

Looking at a site specific level;

Market Bosworth Sports Club - pitches undulating with compaction and weeds,

despite recent investment in drainage (2013) Pitches heavily used and no

remaining spare capacity at peak time for most age groups. There is also very little

remaining additional capacity across the week. A brand new pavilion has recently

been provided.

There is no community use of the two school sites (Market Bosworth High School and

Dixie Grammar School) and therefore scope to increase this in future years.

Stoke Golding Adult -7.5 match equivalents across the week and 1 match

equivalent at peak time

Youth – 1.5 match equivalents across the week and 1 match

Quality issues at both sites, with pitches cut up and compacted

Capacity issues at the recreation ground mean that the club use the school as an

overspill venue but there is very little spare capacity on either site

Capacity issues exacerbated by use of the grass pitches for training due to lack of

access to AGP



equivalent available at peak time

9v9 – no remaining spare capacity at peak time or across the week


peak time without staggering fixtures


peak time without staggering fixtures.

At Stoke Golding Recreation Ground – no spare capacity at peak time. Pitches are

wet and suffer from drainage issues. Some weeds also evident on site and pitches

are uneven and there are also insufficient welfare facilities for teams using the site

There is also little spare capacity on the school site, with pitches forced to

accommodate both games and training.


Potential Impact of budget / Quality Reductions

10.150 As demonstrated throughout this section, given the high peak time demand, many of the

pitches are only used at peak time, and very few are used in several time slots across the

weekend for competitive activity (although training almost doubles the level of activity on some

sites).

10.151 The concentration of demand at peak time can be beneficial to the quality of the pitches as it

means that they are required to sustain lower levels of play than may otherwise be the case. The

importance of high quality maintenance is however clear as many of the more popular venues

are reaching their capacity (due to use for training as well as matches) and the number of

pitches experiencing compaction (which then generates drainage issues etc) is then

exacerbated.

10.152 Added to this, many clubs feel that levels of use are starting to impact on facilities on certain

sites while the quality of other pitches is considered to be continuing to deteriorate due to

restricted maintenance regimes.

10.153 Financial and budget pressures were highlighted as one of the key concerns by many clubs,

and local authorities are also facing an era of budgetary cuts and pressures to reduce services.

While most pitches were rated as standard, many were in the lower echelons of a standard

rating and could therefore easily become poor with poor weather conditions and limited

maintenance procedures. Indeed several sites included one or two pitches that had already

become poor and several more that were approaching this.

10.154 It is therefore necessary to consider the implications of a reduction in playable pitches (and

consequently a reduction in capacity across the borough).

10.155 To provide an estimate of the impact of this, Table 10.16 sets out the amount of spare capacity

that would remain if demand remained equivalent to current levels, but the number of pitches

was reduced by 25%. This theoretical analysis reveals that spare capacity at peak time becomes

very limited in all forms of the game.

10.156 This analysis is indicative only as it assumes that all remaining pitches are standard quality

(when in reality some existing sites are poor and some are good).


Table 10.16: Reduction in Pitches Available by 25%

Pitch

Type

Available

Pitches

Reduction

by 25%

Capacity

of Pitches

(Standard)

Match

Equivalents

(Current

Matchplay

only)

Spare

Capacity

Match

Equivalents

(All

Activity)

Peak

Time

Demand

Spare

Capacity

Adult

Football

(aged

16+)

28 22 44.8 30 14.8 42 2.8 13.5 8.5

Junior

Football

(age U13

- U16)

24 19 38.4 17.5 20.9 38.5 -0.1 12 7

9 v 9

(age U11

and U12)

24 19 38.4 17.5 20.9 44 -5.6 13.5 5.5

7 v 7

(age U9

and U10)

27 22 86.4 27 59.4 51 35.4 25.5 -3.5

5 v 5

(age U7

and U8)

20 16 64 20 44 33.5 30.5 16 0

10.157 Table 10.16 reveals that pitch provision would become very closely matched with demand if quality issues were to cause a deterioration in capacity.


10.158 Notably, when considering specific pitches, if the quality rating of all pitches achieving a score of

60% or below is changed from standard to poor;

When taking into account all activity, the following sites would demonstrate at least one

pitch where overplay was evident; Alans way Sports field; Barwell Academy, Bosworth

Academy, Brookvale Groby Learning Campus, Caterpillar Sports Ground, Westfield

Community College, , Dovecote Pavilion, Hastings High School, Kirkby road, Langdale Park,

Market Bosworth Sports Club, Redmoor academy, Richmond Park, South charnwood High

School, St Martins Academy, Stoke Golding, Stoneycroft sport and social, Swallows Green

When excluding training (which ideally should take place on AGPs), Dovecote Pavilion,

Langdale Park and Swallows Green would not be overplayed and the remaining sites would

see capacity pressures significantly reduced.

10.159 This indicates that if training is relocated to AGPs, capacity pressures on the grass pitches reduces.

It does however also directly demonstrate the importance of retaining quality of the pitch stock as

well as securing long term access to school sites.

FA Demand Modelling

10.160 AGPs are becoming increasingly important for football. The FA facility strategy (2013 – 2015)

seeks to shift football usage away from sand based AGPs to 3g pitches. The emphasis on 3g pitches

to meet training demand in particular will continue in the New National Facilities Strategy which

will soon be released and will cover the period 2019 to 2029.

10.161 The FA vision (November 2014) which is the result of extensive analysis on the facilities used for

football (including grass roots) placed greater emphasis on the benefits of 3g pitches and their

importance for the future delivery of football. This is also reflected in the FA National Game

Strategy 2015 - 2019 which seeks to provide better training and playing facilities. In particular, the

FA cite the additional capacity that AGPs offer compared to grass and their ability to sustain play

during periods of inclement weather, resulting in a reduced number of cancellations.

10.162 The current national game strategy seeks to improve training and playing facilities through £48m

of FA investment to;

create 100 new football turf pitches and improve 2,000 grass pitches;

invest in and roll out a new sustainable model for grassroots facilities in 30 cities through

football hubs owned and operated by local communities; and

ensure half of mini-soccer and youth matches are played on high quality artificial grass

pitches.

10.163 It is therefore important to evaluate the potential demand for 3g pitches and to determine the

role that they could play in the provision of facilities for football in the Borough. The lack of

facilities has been identified as a key issue for training in Hinckley and Bosworth, but also as one of

the overriding causes of capacity and quality issues on grass pitches.

10.164 FA data modelling therefore evaluates the baseline requirement for 3g pitches taking into account

the training requirements of clubs. It assumes that one 3g pitch is required per 42 teams and that

based on FA policy, all football training should take place on 3g pitches (as opposed to sand).

10.165 Assuming that there is a baseline total of 239teams (including Disability teams) this would mean

that there is a requirement for 5 full size AGPs. The New National Football Facilities Strategy will


reduce this ratio further and recommend that one 3G pitch is required for every 38 teams. This

would increase the baseline requirement across Hinckley and Bosworth to six pitches.

10.166 There is only one existing 3g pitch in the borough and there are significant access issues relating

to this facility. It is not currently considered to offer any real capacity for football clubs in the

Borough.

10.167 This would therefore suggest that in broad terms, there is a theoretical requirement for a network

of a further six pitches across the borough to meet current demand.

The Local Situation

10.168 Football demand for AGPs can be categorised into three areas;

matchplay (requires use of a 3g pitch that is included on the FA register) – this links with the

requirement for grass pitches and it was outlined that the 3g AGPs are becoming

increasingly important;

informal / recreational use – pay and play or leagues; and

training (The FA would like to see all clubs having access to a 3g pitch – they discourage the

use of sand based facilities).

Competitive use

10.169 There are no AGPs on the FA register within Hinckley and Bosworth Borough and therefore no

scope for any competitive activity on 3g pitches at the current time. The creation of new pitches

that are included on the register would therefore not only boost the opportunities for training, but

may also help to alleviate some of the capacity pressures that have been evidenced at peak time.

Informal Leagues

10.170 Recreational football (including formal leagues and informal pay and play) is a key part of football

participation, and one that playing pitch strategies do not quantify. 3g pitch provision is however

an important means of providing opportunities for recreational play. Indeed the promotion of

recreational football is seen as one of the key means of boosting participation in the sport in the

coming years.

10.171 There are currently relatively few opportunities for informal recreational football in Hinckley and

Bosworth, with no full sized 3g pitches to host informal leagues. The nearest venues are in

Nuneaton and Leicester. Some of the smaller AGPs do however accommodate local informal

leagues, in particular;

Leisure Leagues – Bosworth Academy small sized pitch

Hinckley Young Peoples Club Five a side league Monday and Thursday.

10.172 The provision of further AGPs would therefore enable the provision of other recreational activities,

such as Walking Football and the Just Play Initiative.

Training

10.173 The lack of 3g pitches in the Borough means that there is almost no use of these facilities for

training. The pitch at Leicester Road has only very limited availability (due to access restrictions

rather than capacity) and very few clubs use this facility to train. Instead clubs travel to Brockington


College, Newbridge High School or use the smaller 3g venues that are dotted across the Borough.

Some clubs also travel to sites nearby in Warwickshire, particularly in Nuneaton.

10.174 This means that for clubs wishing to use facilities within Hinckley and Bosworth, there is no

availability on full size pitches (unless they have access to Leicester Road). Analysis of current

training patterns suggests that several existing clubs use grass pitches to compensate for the lack

of access to 3g pitches.

10.175 This suggests that the creation of further AGPs may reduce overuse of grass pitches rather than

purely displace other activity. This is also supported by club consultation, which indicates that there

is a belief that there remain insufficient 3g AGPs in the borough.

10.176 In terms of both theoretical position and reality on the ground the need for a network of 3g

pitches is therefore supported. It should also be noted that this could also have wider reaching

benefits, with current concerns including the challenges of recruiting volunteers and coaches. The

provision of a network of pitches within the borough would enable local coaching courses to be

held and therefore increase opportunities for residents to become involved in football.

The Potential Role of AGPs - Scenario Testing

10.177 Across the country in some locations, the FA are working to relocate 5v5, 7v7 and sometimes 9v9

football onto AGPs, particularly those currently played on Council pitches. Several games can be

sustained at any one time and this therefore reduces the need for grass pitches and ensures a

consistently better quality of surface which supports skill development.

10.178 While the geographical nature of Hinckley and Bosworth does not necessarily lend itself to one or

two large sites, there is potential that this approach could be delivered through the provision of a

small number of hubs in large towns.

10.179 In Hinckley and Bosworth however peak time for 9v9, 5v5 and 7v7 football is at the same time,

meaning that based upon current programming, separate AGPs would be required to

accommodate these forms of the game. To make better use of any AGPs provided, it would be

necessary to reprogramme fixtures in local leagues (to ensure that league games would take place

across the weekend). While the leagues do operate on a Sunday morning, they do allow fixtures to

be staggered over a 4 - 5 hour period.

10.180 Table 10.17 below illustrates the number of pitches that are required to accommodate all football

at peak time for 9v9, 7v7 and 5v5 football. It considers firstly the amount of AGPs that would be

needed to accommodate all activity.


Table 10.17 Potential Role of 3g Pitches

Scenario

Format

of the

game

Number of teams Fixture

Equivalents

Matches

per full

size AGP

Number

of

match

sessions

Duration of

session (inc.

changeover)

Hours of

play on

3G AGP

Programme

Hours

Available

Pitches

Required

All

Teams

5v5 43 21.5 4 5.375 1 5.375 4 2

7v7 55 27.5 2 13.75 1 13.75 4 4

9v9 45 22.5 2 11.25 1.5 16.875 4 5

10.181 Table 10.17 therefore reveals that to accommodate all games, 11 pitches would be required. If

fixtures were reprogrammed, the number of AGPS could be reduced (in terms of meeting

competitive activity).

10.182 This is higher than the number of pitches that is required for training.


10.183 The future requirement for playing pitches will be impacted by several factors, including;

population growth or change to the demographic profile of the population;

changes in participation trends and in how pitch sports are played;

club specific development plans and aspirations; and

amendments to the current facility stock.

10.184 These issues are considered in turn in order to build an accurate picture of future demand for

playing pitches.

Population Change


generate one team. They are used to project the theoretical number of teams that would be

generated from population growth.

10.186 Table 10.18 summarises the current TGRs for football and uses them to evaluate the potential

impact of projected population change on demand for football in Hinckley and Bosworth. It reveals

that;

the number of adult football teams is likely to decrease by almost 1

there will also an increase in the number of youth teams (1) while the number of 9v9 teams

will remain static

the number of 5v5 teams will increase by 2, while participation in 7v7 will increase by 1.


Table 10.18: TGRs for Football in Hinckley and Bosworth

Sport and Age

Groups

Number

of Teams

Current

population

in age

group

within the

area

Current

TGR

Future

Population

Potential

Change

number of

people in

age group

Potential

Change in

Team

Numbers

Football Adult

Men (16-45yrs)

56

18557

331 18400

-157 -0.5

Football Adult

Women (16-45yrs)

2

18557

9279

18400 -157 0.0

Football Youth

Boys (12-15yrs)

34

2323

68 2407

84 1.2

Football Youth

Girls (12-15yrs)

3

2323

774 2407

84 0.1

Football 9v9 Boys

(10 and 11 years)

31

1231

40 1235

4 0.1

Football 9v9 Girls

(10 and 11 years)

4

1231

308 1235

4 0.0

7V7 (8 – 9 years) 55 2392 43 2431 39 0.9

5v5 (6 – 7 years) 43 2526 59 2656 130 2.2

10.187 These increases would place further pressures on the existing capacity of the borough, with;

The adequacy of provision for adult football remaining consistent;

The slight increase in youth football participation generating an additional 0.5 match

equivalent. The greatest impact is likely to be felt at peak time (spare capacity reducing to

2.5)

spare capacity on 9v9 pitches would remain consistent but very closely balanced, with

demand;

there are slightly higher quantities of availability on 7v7 and 5 v 5 pitches and pitch provision

would remain sufficient, despite the slight increase in participation.

Aspirations of Clubs

10.188 Added to the impact of population growth, it is also necessary to consider the potential for

participation increases. While some clubs in the borough are seeking growth, on the whole, the

current aspiration of the FA is to sustain and stabilise existing participation levels and in particular

to increase the number of female teams. Promotion of disability sport is also a key priority across

Leicestershire, as well as the introduction of initiatives to support recreational football.


10.189 It is however likely that growth will be seen at key clubs who are developmentally focused and

consultation demonstrates that several clubs within the Borough are keen to develop further.

10.190 In total, clubs in Hinckley and Bosworth are seeking to deliver;

Additional 10 senior male teams and 8 female teams (9 match equivalents, 5 at peak

time)

23 additional youth teams and 22 female teams (22.5 match equivalents, mostly at peak

time)

21 mini soccer teams (11.5 match equivalents).

10.191 The impact of this growth on the adequacy of provision across the Borough as a whole is outlined

below in Table 10.19 It assumes that new teams are spread across the age groups evenly and

provides indicative figures only. It clearly indicates that growth aspirations cannot be met within the

existing facility stock.

Table 10.19 – Impact of Population Growth

Scenario

Adult Football Youth Football 9v9 Football 7v7 Football 5v5 Football

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Peak

Tim

e

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Peak T

ime

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Peak

Tim

e

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(All

Acti

vit

y)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Peak

Tim

e)

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

(Co

mp

eti

tive)

Peak

Tim

e

Sp

are

Cap

acit

y

Current

Provision

23 13 7.5 30.5 9.5 10 29.5 3 9 79 55 6 60 46.5 7.5

Future

including

Potential

Growth

14 4 2.5 19.5 -2.5 0 20.5 -7 0 67.5 43.5 -4 48.5 35 -2.5

10.192 Table 10.20 gives consideration as to the aspirations of specific clubs and whether they can be

accommodated on the existing sites. It reveals that many of the clubs with aspirations are those

where site capacity is already constrained.

Table 10.20: Growth Potential

Club Existing Site Comments

AFC Barwell

6 5v5 (including

development age groups), 7

7v7 teams, 4 9v9 teams, 4

youth 11v11 and 1 senior

male. Club also includes 4

inclusive teams DOVECOTE WAY

AFC Market

Bosworth Juniors

4 5v5, 1 7v7, 2 7v7, 2 9v9, 1

youth and 1 senior male ALANS WAY SPORTS FIELD, Newbold Verdon


Club Existing Site Comments

Hinckley Town

Juniors

Futsal, 6 5v5, 2 7v7, 1 9v9

SWALLOWS GREEN

Barlestone St Giles 2 senior male, 2 youth teams BARLESTONE ST GILES SPORTS CLUB

Sporting Markfield

First

1 senior male

JUBILEE PLAYING FIELD

Stoneycroft United 1 senior male STONEYCROFT SPORTS AND SOCIAL CLUB

Caterpillar Juniors

3 7v7, 3 9v9, 2 youth and 2

senior Caterpillar Sports & Social Club

Stoke Golding

2 5v5, 2 7v7, 1 9v9 and 3

11v11 Stoke Golding Recreation Ground

Market Bosworth

Town FC

2 5v5, 3 7v7, 2 9v9, 3 youth

and 4 senior Market Bosworth Sports Club

Hinckley AFC 3 youth, 2 open age Ibstock Miners Welfare

GreenTowers FC

Hinckley

5 5v5, 9 7v7, 6 9v9, 5 youth Richmond Park Richmond Road Hinckley LE10

0DZ

Groby Juniors

6 5v5, 6 7v7, 5 9v9, 3 youth, 1

senior Groby Community College

FC Burbage Juniors 4 9v9, 4 7v7, 2 9v9, 1 youth Sketchley Hill Farm Park

Earl Shilton Albion

FC

1 adult team

Stoneycroft Park

10.193 Overall therefore, unless action is taken it is likely that facilities will inhibit demand.


Summary

10.194 The key issues for football in Hinckley and Bosworth are summarised below.

Summary – Football

There is a need to protect existing pitches if football participation is to be retained

There are high number of teams using pitches and this is generating overplay on some sites. This is

particularly influenced by a lack of training facilities. With only one 3g pitch in the Borough, many

teams are training on grass pitches

The quality of facilities is poor and many pitches are approaching poor standard – this will reduce

capacity. There is evidence of significant compaction (much of which is causing drainage issues)

and this can in part be attributed to the heavy usage, as well as limited maintenance regimes.

Changing facilities are also basic

Peak time demand is also high and there is limited remaining spare capacity. Many of the large

clubs are already unable to accommodate further play on their own site and facilities are starting to

inhibit demand. There is a lack of hub sites and some clubs are dispersed across multiple venues.

Clubs have aspirations for growth, but the lack of facilities means that this is becoming increasingly

challenging. There is however a need to ensure that provision remains accessible and affordable.

There are also concerns around the long-term stability of the pitch stock, with a high proportion of

pitches being located on school sites where access is unsecured.

11:Summary


Introduction

11.1 This section summarises the key issues arising for each of the sports in Hinckley and Bosworth.


Summary of Assessment Findings and Key Issues to Address – Cricket

Summary - Assessment Findings

Supply There are 17 sites containing grass facilities for Cricket in Hinckley and Bosworth, providing a total of 17 pitches. There are no sites

containing two or more cricket pitches. Four sites have non turf cricket pitches

The majority of grass pitches are available for community use with only the two pitches at school sites not available, those being at

Hinckley Academy and Dixie Grammar.

The majority of cricket pitches are managed by clubs themselves meaning they are heavily influential in determining the quality of

pitches provided. Despite many having security of tenure, several clubs are only renting from Parishes, limiting opportunities for

funding and raising concerns over the longevity of provision.

Spatially, pitches are spread across the borough and are primarily located in the northern parishes.

The majority of sites for cricket are fit for purpose, although there is a range in the scale and scope provided. Many sites are held back

by only providing basic facilities whereas others showcase a greater range of facilities including larger pavilions and training equipment.

There are several key quality concerns, these include, weed infestations, uneven outfields, heavy wear and tear from competing

recreational use and overall a lack of outdoor training facilities.

Despite a large volume of clubs indicating that pitch quality has improved, maintenance of pitches and facilities arose as a key concern

for many with the costs of maintenance seen as a significant barrier preventing the implementation of effective improvement regimes.

Two clubs noted the lack of appropriate knowledge and reliance upon a limited number of club members as hindering maintenance

procedures, whilst a lack of funding was also noted as a key hurdle to pitch and facility improvement.


Demand

There are 31 adult male teams currently playing in Hinckley and Bosworth with the majority of teams playing formal cricket on a

Saturday afternoon. Most of the remaining teams mostly playing in Sunday leagues while a small volume play midweek T20 cricket. It is

notable that there are no dedicated girls or ladies teams meaning no female cricket occurs in the borough, this is despite participation

and interest from school girls being high.

Junior cricket is relatively poorly developed with 17 teams. Junior activity is focused at a small selection of clubs however meaning there

are still a few pathways from junior to senior cricket, this is mainly in more rural areas. Therefore 65% of all participation in cricket in the

area is by senior teams.

Unmet demand in neighbouring areas has caused several teams to travel into Hinckley and Bosworth to play cricket. A small amount of

displacement also occurs within the borough with teams from Newbold Verdon CC and Hinckley Amateur CC forced to travel to use

overspill facilities due to insufficient pitch availability at their home grounds.

Decline in participation is evident across the borough with no responding clubs reporting an increase in junior or senior cricket. Clubs

reporting a decline attribute this to a lack of interest from young local players, a shortage of caching staff and a lack of funding.

Casual demand for cricket is low with Langdale Park (the only facility in the borough available for casual bookings) only taking three

pitch bookings during the 2017 season. The demand for formal cricket from the education sector is also low and this is highlighted by

the lack of cricket facilities at school sites. Cricket at Primary school is strong however this does not typically involve the use of formal

facilities.

Adequacy of

Provision

The overall picture across the borough is that no sites are over overplayed and almost all sites can sustain further play across the

season. However this capacity is greatly restricted at peak times (Saturday PM) when only two sites in the Leicestershire and Rutland

League, these being Higham on the Hill CC and Swallows Green CC, have spare capacity. Capacity is also available during peak times at

Langdale Park, however the quality of this facility likely means it is only suitable for use in the lower divisions.

While there is some displacement of teams from within Hinckley and Bosworth, this is due to a lack of second ground within the club

base and the demand is accommodated within Hinckley and Bosworth itself.

No responding club identified a lack of pitches as a key issue for the borough and spare capacity is evident in both the urban area and

Northern Parishes.

There is no evidence of latent demand within cricket clubs and many have experienced recent decline and would therefore have the

capacity to accommodate possible future increased activity. Future population growth is predicted to impact upon future demand with


Summary of Assessment Findings and Key Issues to Address- Bowls

up to a further two junior teams predicted to be created resulting in a need to accommodate circa 14 junior matches per season. This

should be easily accommodated within the current stock.

Leicestershire County Cricket Club’s plan to implement a sustainable approach to the development of cricket aims to increase

participation levels and inspire the next generation of players. Linking with this plan, many of the cricket clubs have some aspirations for

growth however this is mainly in the context of recent decline so many clubs are currently fighting to retain existing players. Clubs with

significant growth aspirations have the ability to accommodate these goals within their existing infrastructure. However several clubs

have relatively limited opportunity for club growth if demand were to arise and have scope for only one additional team. These clubs

are; Hinckley Amateurs, Ratby, Stapleton and Stoke Golding. Therefore this showcases capacity pressures in both the northern Parishes

and the urban area in the face of future demand.

It is important to note that during the 2018 season a further team, Bombay Cricket Club, will be playing in Hinckley and Bosworth at

Langdale Road.

Key Issues for

Strategy to

Address

There is a need to protect existing sites- all pitches are well used and required to sustain demand. Langdale Park provides an

opportunity to increase cricket in the borough.

Concerns over the security of tenure at key sites.

Opportunities to improve maintenance at sites across the borough and a need to enhance the succession planning at all clubs.

Quality issues (most notably poor outfield), but particularly where these are impacting club progression.

Lack of training facilities at the majority of sites (there are no facilities at all at Barwell Sports Club, Burbage CC, Market Bosworth Sports

Club, Stapleton Village CC, Stoke Golding CC, Langdale Recreation Ground.



Supply There are 11 sites containing functional outdoor bowling greens. There is one green on each site meaning that there are 11 greens

across Hinckley and Bosworth. Five of the 11 greens are in the urban area with the remainder in the northern Parishes; poor coverage is

seen to the west of the borough. All existing greens accommodate at least one club.

Site visits reveal that all existing bowling greens are functional and fit for purpose with the average quality score of 76% suggesting

most greens are of standard quality.

Several sites contain social facilities such as a bar and social areas, providing a greater income and enabling investment to be

channelled into the management and maintenance of facilities, overall improving sustainability. Many clubs highlighted the small

clubhouses and lack of social facilities as a significant barrier to growing participation.

Cleanliness is the most highly rated attribute (lack of litter and graffiti) with mowing frequency also rated well. Spectator provision and

storage, as well as grass cover were identified as key areas for improvement, with several greens exhibiting bare patches and patches of

weeds. Several greens also require levelling to enable bowls to be played at a high standard. Many greens also demonstrated thatching

as well as areas of moss being present. Fusarium was also evident at Hinckley Bowls Club and Rugby Road Recreational Ground, the

disease had been caught earlier but its original presence suggests that there are issues in the maintenance of greens.

Around the green, channels were all well maintained. The basic infrastructure of facilities is adequate however several sites have poor or

limited car parking which impacts on club fixtures. Parking for Hollycroft Park is either roadside or in the carpark at the bottom of a hill,

forcing bowlers to walk up. Market Bosworth BC and Burbage Constitutional Bowls Club also only have roadside parking.

The vast majority of clubs indicated they were satisfied with the current provision with any dissatisfaction mainly concerning the quality

of facilities and their negative impact on club development.

Varying perceptions was seen regarding green quality with grass cover and the quality of the playing surface identified as key areas of

improvement by clubs.

Concern was also raised surrounding the high cost of maintenance and the lack of specialist staff and training to carry out

improvements/maintenance.


Demand

Nationally, the participation in outdoor bowls has declined over the 2005-2016 period. For Hinckley and Bosworth the participation in

bowls is inconsistent with particularly lower levels of participation in the more urban areas. All clubs in the borough indicate they are

actively seeking new participants.

Across Hinckley and Bosworth there are 893 people playing bowls currently. Players mainly fall into the older age profiles of Elise,

Arnold and Frank. There is scope to increase the amount of participation in other groups, particularly Ralph and Phyllis. There is very

low junior participation with just 5 players aged U18 in the borough. Market Segmentation indicates 201 additional residents would like

to participate with potential and unmet demand fairly even across the borough.

There are no clear trends regarding membership numbers with almost equal proportions experiencing growth and decline. There is no

clear pattern by provider type or by location, suggesting that club membership trends are site specific and unpredictable. In addition to

playing members, there are 89 non-playing members at existing responding clubs showcasing the importance of the wider social role

bowls plays and showing how ensuring the effective provision of spectator and social facilities is vital.

Key challenges in relation to growing membership include; a lack of interest in bowls, the cost of playing, the perceived poor quality of

existing facilities, a lack of caches and volunteers and the limited awareness of the existence of bowling clubs.

Sweet Pea Bowls Club highlighted concerns about their long term security of tenure with the club bound by expensive annual fees; the

club noted that this insecurity has negatively impacted on their ability to attract new members. They do however continue to work hard

to increase the number of members.

The Governing Body of Bowls highlighted the need for greater flexibility within the sport and the need to promote new ‘short forms of

the game including New Age Bowls and Set Play in order to increase participation.


Adequacy of

Provision

There are no supply and demand models for bowling greens. The adequacy of provision is therefore evaluated by drawing together

the data collected and determining the key issues impacting current and projected future participation.

Green quality is seen as instrumental in facilitating the ongoing delivery of bowls and despite only two clubs not being satisfied with

the existing facilities there are concerns over the skills of those maintaining the greens. Car parking and social facilities are also

considered an essential component of bowling greens.

There is no evidence that suggests there is a requirement for additional facilities to meet current demand with all clubs indicating that

they have scope to accommodate additional members.

Guidance suggests that a bowling green becomes particularly unsustainable where club memberships fall below 20 members. Data

shows there are no greens where membership drops below this target. Membership is particularly high Hinckley Bowls Club, Kingscroft

Bowls Club, Market Bosworth and Bridge Road highlighting the sustainability of these facilities. The average membership per green in

the urban area is almost 60 compared to just 48 in the northern Parishes. These participation levels suggest all existing facilities are

valuable and should be protected. Increasing the levels of participation at the clubs with lower memberships such as clubs in Bagworth,

Barlestone and Desford is key but membership levels are not sufficiently low enough to suggest that facilities are unsustainable.

The ageing population is likely to influence participation in bowls more so than for most sports. The number of people aged 55+ is

likely to increase as is their propensity to participate in bowls, increasing demand and placing additional pressures on existing

resources.

Based upon existing club membership, demand for bowls is expected to increase by 202 players (71 players at each green) by 2036 as

a direct result of population growth. These levels are still sustainable within the existing stock. However if higher participation rates

were used this growth would increase to 128 players per green and provision may be insufficient to meet demand. Analysis of existing

bowls clubs represents the most accurate means of determining demand for bowling greens therefore an average of circa 71 members

is likely to be experienced which is a healthy membership that the current stock of facilities can meet.

Growth is unlikely to be even with sites in the urban area having a lower capacity to sustain additional growth. The scope to

accommodate further play in Market Bosworth will also be limited, given the high levels of play already in existence.

Key Issues for

Strategy to

Address

Facility quality requires improvement- playing surface and grass cover identified as key area, several greens have bare patches and

there is evidence of weeds. Some greens undulating.

Some issues relating to ancillary facilities and car parking


Opportunities to improve the quality of maintenance. There are concerns about the lack of specialist training or knowledge, cost and

age of volunteers and a consequential need to undertake some succession planning.

There are opportunities to increase play at some sites in particular Bagworth, Barlestone, Sport in Desford and Burbage Constitutional.

There are concerns about the lease at Sweet Pea Bowls Club

There is a need to raise awareness of bowling in the borough and to increase participation borough wide

Summary of Assessment Findings and Key Issues to Address- Tennis



Supply There are 54 active tennis courts with public/community access located at 15 sites. These courts are split between public (park) sites,

schools and private clubs. The provision at school sites makes up more than half of all community accessible tennis courts. 16 of the

accessible courts are floodlit. 19 of the 54 courts are located in the urban area with the remainder located in the Northern Parishes.

The majority of courts are rated as standard (56%) with 10% of courts being rated as poor. Club based facilities are of the highest

quality, followed by schools and park courts. The quality of these facilities is vastly different but so are the requirements they serve, with

clubs attracting more serious players and park courts being used for more informal play.

Spectator seating and storage are key areas of concern, however these don’t apply to all sites. Otherwise, the playing surface and

fencing are the key areas of improvement. Several sights show cracks, weeds and uneven patches with the nets also requiring

improvements.

Facilities at club bases and park sites are dedicated facilities for tennis however the majority of courts on school sites are over marked

for other sports, meaning tennis must compete with other activities.

The three club bases of Hinckley Tennis Club, Market Bosworth Tennis Club and Sport in Desford, which all offer floodlit tennis courts,

are well dispersed across the borough with Hinckley Tennis Club serving the urban area and Market Bosworth and Desford serving the

west and east of the borough respectively.

Access to park facilities is limited with only Hollycroft Park providing high quality pay and play courts plus the site at Newbold Verdon,

the only facility in the Northern Parishes is of poor quality. Schools with accessible courts are distributed across the borough and

provide localised opportunities for those in rural areas. However despite the fair distribution of facilities, the rural nature of the borough

means that some residents remain outside of the catchment for tennis courts.

Demand

Nationally, the proportion of residents playing tennis is declining. However participation in Hinckley and Bosworth is high, with

between 2% and 5% of residents of the borough playing tennis in almost all areas. In total 1957 people play tennis with participation at

least once per month highest by Tim, Philip and Ben.

Those who do not play tennis but would like to are in similar groups to current participants, but there is particular latent demand from

Philip and Tim as well as Elaine and Alison. 2081 people would like to play tennis and this data makes tennis the only sport where there

are more people that would like to play than actually do.


There are limited public tennis courts across the borough with the main facility being Hollycroft Park. There were 253 individual users

over the period April 2016-2017. This represents a low level of use with LTA estimating that two court sites within rural areas should be

sustaining between 500-1000 individual users each year, this implies there is significant scope to increase usage of facilities. Prices are

on the high side of LTA average and clubs indicate they believe these prices to be a barrier to usage. There is also scope to increase

usage at Alans Way Playing Field, the other public managed tennis site. The LTA see increasing participation in public parks as a key

priority.

There is a reasonably good level of access to tennis courts at secondary schools however they receive very little promotion. Almost all

responding schools suggest that their tennis courts are underused outside of curricular hours. This presents a great opportunity for

tennis development.

Regarding club membership, there are three tennis clubs within Hinckley and Bosworth representing a strong foundation for the

development of tennis. Membership is static however floodlight investment at Hinckley Tennis Club generated membership growth.

The key barriers to growth for tennis are perceived to include facility restrictions (site capacity/volunteers), pressures on

coaches/volunteers, funding issues and a lack of public facilities supporting grass roots tennis.

The LTA aims to ensure that rain and darkness no longer inhibits play. They therefore aim to increase the number of covered and

floodlit courts by 50%, this draws on the importance of having floodlit and covered courts to facilitate demand. The LTA see the

greatest opportunity for growth within 20-39 year olds and 40-49 year olds, suggesting both park courts and club based facilities will

be key in furthering participation.

The quality of public courts is deemed to be essential in order to develop grass roots tennis. It is estimated that circa £1200 per annum

should be placed into a sinking fund to enable repair works.


Adequacy of

Provision

Considering the current and potential future participation levels there is an overall potential tennis playing population of 4038 across

Hinckley and Bosworth, this is significantly greater than the current levels of club membership (505).

LTA parameters, which are used to analyse demand for tennis and to determine when facilities are at or approaching capacity, set the

guidance for facility use at 1 court per 40 participants (not floodlit) and 1 court per 60 players (floodlit), the existing stock of active

outdoor courts that are available for community use will serve 2480 players. According to Active People, there are 1907 existing players

meaning that the stock of facilities is above the level required. However If the latent demand was realised (4038 players) this would

place the provision below the levels required. A total playing population of 4038 people would therefore require an additional 39

courts.

There is therefore a significant amount of additional provision needed if latent demand were to be met, particularly considering the

evidence that suggests existing courts are not used to their full potential.

While there are insufficient courts within the borough to accommodate target levels of participation, there is scope to increase the use

of existing facilities before new courts are required.

Regarding club bases, the existing three have capacity for 780 players with current membership equating to 505. This shows that there

is scope to accommodate at least a further 275 members. Suggesting further courts are not required to meet club need. However this

disguises issues relating to the size of club base, particularly the minimal spare space at Hinckley Tennis Club. Therefore if latent

demand was to be realised, the existing stock of facilities accessible to the community would be insufficient.

The wider range of participants in tennis means that population growth may have a greater impact than for other sports. Using LTA

parameters that up to 3% of the population may play tennis, the projected increase of 12977 people between 2017 and 2036 will

generate a further 389 tennis players. When added to the assumed current levels of participation this shows that existing levels of

participation would be unable to accommodate the future growth

Key Issues for

Strategy to

Address

Good distribution of sites, but quality poor at public courts (excluding Hinckley Hollycroft Park).

There is good availability at school sites and quality is standard, but there is limited promotion and a general lack of awareness of

facilities that are available.

Maintenance at all sites is limited and there are few courts where sinking funds are in place. Quality issues (in particular line markings

and poor playing surfaces) are identified at several sites.

Although club membership is static, clubs believe that this is impacted by facility restrictions (site capacity and court quality) as well as

pressures on volunteers, funding issues and a lack of public facilities supporting grass roots tennis.


Modelling based on actual participation demonstrates that there are sufficient facilities and scope to increase usage (particularly

schools and public venues) significantly. Viability modelling indicates that more facilities may be required but the LTA highlight the

need to maximise the use of the existing network and to ensure that the facility stock is sustainable moving forwards.

There is limited capacity at Hinckley Tennis Club but scope to reinvigorate participation at Desford and Market Bosworth. There is

potential for clubs to play a much wider role in increasing participation.

A low level of participation compared to modelling estimates suggests that there are significant opportunities for marketing and

promotion.

Summary of Assessment Findings and Key Issues to Address- Hockey


Supply Hockey is now almost exclusively played on AGPs (Artificial Grass Pitches). England Hockey states that water based, sand dressed and

sand filled pitches are suitable for Hockey however 3G pitches are not. All the pitches suitable for hockey are located on school sites

meaning the Borough Council has limited control over access to hockey pitches, compared to other sports.

There are five full sized pitches in Hinckley and Bosworth, of which four are sand filled pitches and therefore suitable for hockey. One

pitch is 3G so therefore unsuitable for hockey. There are also several small pitches including; Alans Way sports Field, Battling Brook

Primary School, Bosworth Primary School, Bosworth Academy, Hinckley Club for Young People and Markfield Community Sports Centre.

The qualities of facilities at Brookvale Learning Campus, Groby and Hinckley Academy are rated as standard with the newer facilities at

Dixie Grammar and Hinckley Academy rated standard to good.

Demand

Hinckley Hockey Club are the only hockey club affiliated to England Hockey in the borough. Before folding and merging with Coalville

Hockey Club due to falling membership and struggling to field a team each week, they ran one team which played in the

Leicestershire Hockey League and were based at Dixie Grammar. Dixie Grammar is currently used as an overspill venue for Ashby

Hockey Club who travel into the borough.

There are five teams in the borough affiliated to the Leicestershire Mixed Hockey Association, they all play at Brookvale Learning


Campus, Groby and play competitive fixtures each weekend. The number of teams in this league is declining and is at it’s lowest since

1975. Demand for hockey in the borough is unlikely to increase significantly without sports development intervention.

Only two (Dixie Grammar and Brookvale Learning Campus) of the four sand filled facilities are used and there is limited hockey across

the borough, with no junior hockey opportunity. All teams play their competitive matches on a Saturday with very little use of facilities

in midweek. There is no evidence of teams being displaced outside the borough.

Educational use of AGPs occurs outside of peak hours and does not impact upon community hockey access. Increasing participation in

hockey in schools is seen as the key vehicle for generating increased activity in the sport, a selection of schools in the area have

featured in competitions

Due to the lack of 3G pitches in the borough this means that sand based facilities are used for football training and hockey clubs

therefore face competition in accessing pitches. Pitches with hockey surfaces in Hinckley and Bosworth are primarily used for football.

Adequacy of

Provision

Peak time demand across the borough equates to 2 match equivalents while capacity across the borough equates to 12 match

equivalents giving a significantly spare capacity in the borough at peak times. Demand and usage is so low that all activity could be

accommodated within one AGP. This means that there are significant levels of unused capacity within the borough for hockey.

The high levels of pitch stock compared to the number of teams means that there is capacity across all venues, although hockey clubs

must compete with football clubs for access to sites for midweek training

The quality of facilities is currently adequate, with all sites suitable to accommodate the standard of hockey required

Due to the already low levels of hockey participation, population growth will have no impact in any age group and the demand for

pitches will remain static.

England Hockey aspires to build participation in the sport and retain existing players. However Hinckley Hockey Club has experienced

issues fielding a team and in previous years the collapse of Bosworth Ladies also occurred. Added to this, the Mixed Hockey Association

has also experienced a downward trend in the number of competing teams. There is therefore no clear growth that is likely to take

place in the borough in participation in hockey over the strategy period.

England hockey has however committed to focus on increasing participation within schools with a view to channelling interest into clubs

longer term.


Key Issues for

Strategy to

Address

There are four sand based AGPs but only two are currently used for hockey. Demand equates to only 2 match equivalents at peak time

(Saturday) and a small number of hours midweek for training. This could therefore be accommodated on one AGP

The quality of facilities is generally standard to good, although there are no sinking funds in place and therefore potentially longer term

concerns about quality issues as surfaces age

Existing levels of participation in hockey are declining and there are concerns that the only affiliated club will fold at the end of the

season. Added to this, the numbers of teams playing in Mixed Hockey Association leagues are also declining (although the number of

teams is increasing). Without significant intervention, hockey participation in the borough may become almost extinct.

Summary of Assessment Findings and Key Issues to Address - Golf


Supply There are 13 standard courses within a 20-minute driving catchment of the main built up area of Hinckley, comprising 198 holes. The

more local 10-minute catchment includes one course in Hinckley and Bosworth plus one more in neighbouring Rugby. Despite there

being two par 3 courses on the edges of the borough there are no par 3 courses within Hinckley and Bosworth.

There are 5 Golf Driving Range's within a 20 minute driving catchment of Hinckley, comprising 114 bays. Three of these are floodlit,

meaning there are 66 floodlit bays in total. Within a 10-minute catchment there is just one range with 24 floodlit bays. All of these are

outside of the borough. All the faculties have pay and play access however some clubs, such as Hinckley Golf Club, are predominantly

members only.

There are also a large number of golf facilities accessible Hinckley and Bosworth residents that lie within a 20-30 minute driving

catchment of the borough. These include Coventry Golf Club and Leicestershire Golf Club. Overall in this catchment there are 33

standard courses comprising 549 holes and 6 par 3 courses comprising 63 holes.

Local relative provision for all standard courses is very low compared with CSP, regional and national average. Provision of standard

courses within a 20 minute driving catchment is still low compared with the average however the wider 30 minute driving catchment is

better supplied and is about average for the region and England. Although it is worth noting that many of these standard courses are


at the outer edge of the 30 minute catchment and therefore could be considered as outside a reasonable travel time for most people.

Local provision within H&B for par 3 courses and two of the adjacent districts is non-existent but the 20 and 30 minute catchments are

well supplied compared to the national average. The provision of GDR’s both within H&B and within both the 20 and 30 minute

catchment is in line with the regional and national average.

Regarding quality, considering the nature of golf, the predominance of clubs in managing their own facilities, and the demands of

users, most courses are considered to be of acceptable, high quality or in good condition.

Demand and supply within H&B itself is broadly in balance. There are some vacancies at the private club in H&B and the pay and play

course appears to welcome new golfers.

Demand

Sport England data shows that from 2005/6 to 2015/16 regular participation in golf in England has declined overall however England

Golf believes that participation levels appeared to have stabilised after 2015.

East Midlands regional participation has generally declined in line with the national average as has participation in the local CSP area.

In terms of data for Hinckley and Bosworth, there is data from APS1 available but not APS2 to APS10. However based on the trends in

participation over the past 10 years in the areas where consistent data is available, the current participation in H&B may well be about

1.6-1.7%. There may well be about 1400-2200 current regular adult golfers in the area. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed that

golf participation in H&B is slightly higher than the national average.

Sport England’s Local Sports Profiles estimate a 4.5% population increase from the base population in 2014 to 2020. Almost all

population growth is predicted in the 5-9 and 70+ age groups. However based on this data, it is unlikely that population change will

have any impact on golf participation up to 2020.

The three main market segments in H&B that participate in golf are Tim, Phillip and Roger and Joy. It is broadly the same groups that

currently play that would like to participate more. The Market Segmentation data estimates there are 3250 adult golf players in the

borough, a higher estimate than that of the APS data.

The England Golf Strategy 2017-2021 aims to increase membership of clubs from 650,000 to 675,000 and increase the number of

golfers playing twice monthly to over 1 million. Locally this could result in an increase of an additional 55-85 players or club members.

Market Segmentation data suggests there is latent demand from an additional 1400 adults in the catchment area.

However for the purpose of this study, it may be reasonable to conclude that in accordance with the existing character of the area,


likely population change and the existing participation level in golf, demand may increase by about 150 participants over the next 8-10

years.

Overall the demand for golf in Hinckley and Bosworth and the surrounding area is slightly higher than the national average, and that

with future and latent demand increasing only slightly and England Golf promoting additional participation, demand may increase in

the area by no more than about 5-10% overall up to 2020.There will be particular demand for the types of course suitable for beginners

and high handicap players.

Adequacy of

Provision

There is a below average supply of standard golf courses in Hinckley and Bosworth and the immediate surrounding area. All existing

courses in the borough should be retained and protected for the contribution they make to meeting existing demand for regular play

for members and casual golfers alike.

Forest Hill is under potential threat for an alternative use. The loss would mean there would be no GDR’s in H&B and would reduce

further the supply and demand balance.

There is a case for the development of a pay and play starter/improvers course catering for new golfers, there is also a case for other

practice and coaching facilities such as a GDR for casual access, possibly in conjunction with existing courses in the area or alternatively

as a new enterprise.

Key Issues

for Strategy

to Address

Retention of existing golf courses and golf driving ranges

Potential to develop a pay and play course targeting new golfers

Requirement for practice / coaching facilities with casual access.

Summary of Assessment Findings and Key Issues to Address- Rugby Union



Supply There are 22 senior rugby union pitches located in Hinckley and Bosworth BC. The presence of facilities at most school sites ensures

that there are facilities in most of the largest settlements. Less than half of all rugby union pitches are secured for community use. Most

school sites offer some degree of access to the general public, but as academies, almost all of this access is on an unsecured basis.

Schools are actually the largest provider of rugby union pitches in the borough.

8 full sized pitches are managed by local clubs, with Market Bosworth RFC and Hinckley RFC having large facilities (4 and 5 pitches

respectively). There are no rugby pitches provided by Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council. The pitch provided at Burbage for

Burbage RFC is the only pitch provided by a Parish Council. There are only 3.5 floodlit pitches meaning opportunities for training are

limited.

The key issues for quality in relation to club based pitches in Hinckley and Bosworth are:

- The limited amount of maintenance outside of the main club pitches (e.g. junior pitches), this is mainly due to financial restrictions.

Improving maintenance would increase pitch capacity.

- There are drainage issues on several sites, with evidence of waterlogging.

- There is a need for improved changing facilities and pavilions.

- There is a lack of floodlighting to support club activity.

Demand

There are three rugby union clubs in the Borough running a total of 7 adult teams, 2 colts, 8 youth and 12 midi teams.

Of these clubs, two offer progression from junior to seniors, running teams at all age groups while Burbage RUFC only run two senior

teams. The level of junior play suggests that rugby union is relatively well developed within the borough. There are no female teams at

any age groups.

Overall participation is static or increasing (Burbage RFC) and there is a sustainable network of clubs. Two of three clubs are the Hinckley

and Burbage urban area, although Market Bosworth RFC provides opportunities to participate in rugby in the more northerly

settlements.

Only Burbage RFC highlights particular pressures arising from their training requirements. At this site two teams train twice per week

and a lack of floodlights means that the club uses Hinckley RFC during winter months for training sessions.


Almost all schools in the borough have at least one rugby pitch. There is little evidence of participation in national rugby competitions,

although bath Dixie Grammar and Market Bosworth School have entered competitions within the last couple of years.

Adequacy of

Provision

There is no use of any of the school sites by rugby clubs, with no facilities used on a regular basis. This means that there are 13 rugby

pitches in the borough that are available but not used. However the capacity of these facilities is limited with the maintenance

programme restricted meaning that the maximum site capacity is 1.5. These pitches also sustain curricular use, restricting the amount of

club based activity that they could accommodate. Therefore in total at school sites, there is scope to accommodate 6.5 match

equivalents either across the week or at peak times. It is worth noting that there are no existing floodlights at any of the school sites,

meaning that they cannot be used for training.

Considering match play only, there is sufficient capacity at each of the club bases to accommodate play. Once training is taken into

account, supply however becomes much more tightly matched with demand. Specifically;

- At Market Bosworth the limited maintenance procedures restrict capacity to a degree however quality is starting to improve

following investment and it is expected that capacity will start to increase shortly. The site has sufficient capacity to accommodate

match play but training places pressures on the pitches and there is evidence of a small degree of overplay. Only one set of

floodlights means that all activity is shoehorned onto this pitch, meaning that it is heavily used.

- At Hinckley RFC there are varying levels of maintenance with the pitches accommodating teams playing at higher levels receiving

more attention. The club raised concerns about drainage and both these issues impact upon capacity. The current levels of training

generate over play, particularly on the floodlit pitches. Excluding the impact of training however, there is a small amount of spare

capacity across the week. The midi pitches are important in reducing the use of senior pitches and in turn minimalizing the volume

of overplay. There are also insufficient changing rooms, with8 required to ensure that all pitches can be used at the same time.

- At Burbage RFC, maintenance schedules restrict club activity, but with just one team, provision is sufficient to accommodate match

play. However the lack of floodlighting means that the site cannot accommodate training activity in the winter and the team has to

relocate. There are concerns about the security of tenure on this site. The changing rooms are currently poor but are due to be

improved, although it is not known whether this will involve the extension of the lease of the rugby club.

Burbage RFC are the only example of displaced demand within Hinckley and Bosworth. No concerns have been expressed regarding

the amount of facilities available to other clubs, although it is believed that high training levels and a lack of appropriate training

facilities places great pressures on both Hinckley RFC and Market Bosworth RFC.

Regarding population change the projected population growth by Team Generation Rates, indicates that there will be an overall


decline in the number of people playing adult rugby union, but this will be insufficient to cause the loss of a team. Similarly, the

increase of people in younger aged categories will be insufficient to impact upon the number of rugby union teams in the borough.

The RFU are working with individual clubs, and through the use of development plans aim to drive increases in participation.

Aspirations of clubs within H&B are as follows;

- Market Bosworth RFC- looking to develop additional senior male team and create senior female team.

- Hinckley RFC- retain existing teams and ensure stability and growth of playing numbers.

- Burbage RFC- no immediate aspirations for growth, although longer term club would like to develop an additional team.

The RFU council has recently approved a strategy to invest in Artificial Grass Pitches (AGP) which will see 100 artificial, floodlit pitches

installed across the country over a four year period. The key drivers for this are to sustain and grow participation while addressing

pressure on natural turf pitches, changing player expectations, addressing competition from other sports and cope with changing

weather conditions. While this programme has currently been put on hold, there may be opportunities for the development of a 3g

AGP pitch within Hinckley and Bosworth which may ease the overplay problems caused by overuse of facilities. There is a 3g pitch at

Leicester Road which is hardly used, very close to Hinckley RFC, this should be considered as part of the future decision making process.

Key Issues for

Strategy to

Address

There is a need to protect facilities at all three club bases as all are valuable for rugby union

Maintenance improvements at all three sites would increase capacity and ensure the longevity of pitches. The quality of facilities has

recently improved following a particular focus on maintenance. There are also drainage concerns at both Market Bosworth RFC and

Hinckley RFC that need to be addressed.

All club bases are heavily used when taking into account training. There is a need to consider the provision of extra floodlighting

(Market Bosworth RFC and Burbage RFC) and/or access to a 3g World Rugby Compliant AGP (Hinckley RFC).

The clubhouse at Hinckley RFC is believed to be restricting growth and there is a need to ensure that planned changes to the pavilion at

Burbage RFC meet the needs of the rugby club.

The remaining lease at Burbage RFC expires in 2022 and therefore short security of tenure is a concern.


Summary of Assessment Findings and Key Issues to Address- Football


Supply There are 123 individual formal grass football pictures currently available for community use across Hinckley and Bosworth. Of the

pitches currently available for use, 23% are full sized grass pitches while the remainder cater for younger teams. 40% of community

pitches that are available for community use in the Borough are located on school sites. Pitches at school sites are often considered

unsecured, particularly at school with academy status, and all schools in the borough hold academy status.

Almost all secondary school sites in the area indicate their facilities are available, however these facilities showcase a higher degree of

insecurity as; many have policies in place that are reviewed annually or biannually, there is often no advertising, some schools do not

have specific booking procedures in place and as independent bodies academies are able to control their own facilities easily. The

majority of primary schools are not open for community access with many having unmarked basic playing fields.

The FA now approves certain types of AGP for use in competitive fixtures. During the 2017-2018 season there was just one full sized 3g

pitch in the Borough located at Leicester Road however this pitch was not listed on the FA pitch register so is unable to be used for

competitive fixtures. There are several smaller sized 3g pitches which supplement the stock of full sized pitches. These include pitches

at; Battling Brook Primary School, Bosworth Academy and Hinckley Club for Young People.

The majority of pitches are located within the Northern Parishes, with roughly a third of pitches located in the Hinckley and Burbage

urban area.

Within Hinckley and Bosworth, the education sector is the largest provider of pitches, managing 40%. 28% of pitches are managed by

clubs with a further 20% the responsibility of Parish Councils. HBBC also manages pitches and this variety in ownership can create

inconsistencies.

A greater proportion of clubs in the borough indicate that they are unhappy with the pitch stock compared to those that said they were

satisfied. The key reasons for dissatisfaction were; a lack of pitches (both grass and 3g), the poor quality of pitches and the impact of

overuse and, a lack of appropriate changing/welfare facilities for young people. Other issues that were noted included; the difficulty in

recruiting and retaining coaches and volunteers and the costs associated with playing.

From the site visits, the average score achieved by pitches was 58%, which falls within the standard range. However the site analysis of


pitch quality showed that the overall condition of facilities is lower in many instances than the scores suggest. In regards to football

pitch quality, site visits reveal that;

- There were very few, if any, unplayable pitches, however there was evidence of compaction, poor drainage and standing water on

many pitches in the borough.

- There is evidence of undulation on many sites, and levelling would be beneficial. There are also issues with weed growth.

- Although many sites are open to the public, little impact of the widespread informal access was evident at the time.

- There are some sites that would benefit from improvement in ancillary facilities.

The majority of clubs indicated that the condition of facilities has either remained static or improved, with only a small number of clubs

reporting a decline. Similar reasons were given by clubs evidencing both improvement and decline. These included; improved/reduced

maintenance, drainage improvement/decline, pitches benefiting from limited use/heavy use causing deterioration. Drainage and pitch

evenness are considered particularly problematic by clubs. Dog fouling was also raised as a concern.

Demand

In total there are 236 teams currently based in Hinckley and Bosworth. Just 24% of teams are senior teams with the remainder being

age group teams. This broadly balances with the proportion of pitches that are full size, suggesting that the pitch stock is well tailored

to demand.

While there are strong participation rates for males, female football is less well established with 2.8% of teams. The need to ensure

separate changing facilities was noted by clubs as a barrier to further growth of these teams. Several girls however do play within mixed

teams rather than in dedicated female teams. Disability football is strong in the borough with 8 team primarily focused in Barwell.

Like the distribution of pitches, the spread of teams is fairly even across the borough. The highest proportion of teams is in the south,

where the highest amounts of pitches are provided. Participation is therefore broadly correlated with pitch provision. Participation is

therefore likely influenced by the pitch stock to an extent.

There are three teams that are currently displaced out of the borough due to a perceived lack of appropriate facilities within H&B.

Hinckley AFC and Hinckley AFC U18 teams are displaced to Ibstock Miners Welfare.Groby Town Honey Badgers are displaced to Cedars


Academy.

There are several opportunities for progression right through from mini, to junior and adult age groups, with many clubs offering teams

at a variety of age groups. There are also several clubs playing in the Non League System meaning there are specific requirements that

must be adhered to, in relation to the facilities provided at the home ground.

Similar to the national picture, there has been a decline in participation in adult football in recent years, although most clubs now

believe participation is now static. There is believed to be strong growth in younger and junior age groups.

Clubs use a mixture of grass pitches and AGP’s for training. While many clubs use AGP’s midweek, there is also fairly extensive training

on grass pitches on a Saturday morning, in particular by junior clubs. Club consultation demonstrates that while a higher proportion of

clubs are satisfied with the training facilities, 40% of clubs are dissatisfied. The key reasons being; a perceived lack of pitches, with only

one 3g pitch in the borough most clubs using AGP’s are forced to train on sand based requirements, the cost of pitch hire and a lack of

welfare facilities at some sites. The majority of single adult teams indicate that they do not train at all and do not wish to.

Several clubs and schools raised aspirations for a 3g pitch on their site.

All secondary schools within Hinckley and Bosworth have their own playing fields. The schools particularly important to community use

include; Bosworth Academy, Brookvale Groby Learning Campus, Redmoor Academy and South Charnwood High School. School use of

grass pitches has limited impact on peak time demand and the availability of pitches.

Adequacy of

Provision

The majority of grass pitches in Hinckley were assessed as standard and capacity has therefore been calculated as such. It should be

noted however that many are close to becoming poor.

The majority of pitches in the borough are able to sustain additional play across the week when excluding any training activity. When

considering only match play, there is very little overplay evident with only a small amount at Westfield Community Colleg and Kirkby

Road.

However training does impact significantly at a number of sites, almost doubling the level of usage the site receives over the course of

the week. In most instances, training causes overplay when without it the pitch would be within its weekly capacity. These sites are

primarily associated with the larger clubs running high numbers of teams.

It is clear that heavy usage is contributing to the compaction that is currently experienced on many pitches across the borough; this in


turn causes drainage issues that further impact the quality of the site.

There are only a very small number of venues that receive minimal community use. Hammonds Park is an example and this site serves as

an overspill venue. Bosworth School, Dixie Grammar, Heath Lane School and Hinckley Academy are the only other examples of sites

where facilities are available but not used.

Peak time demand for pitches is very concentrated with all forms of the game being a Sunday morning and different age groups wishing

to use the facilities at the same time. This means that almost all activity (excluding training) takes place at this time and there is little

demand for facilities outside of this peak period.

Reflecting this, analysis of availability at peak time demonstrates that total spare capacity is limited. There are very few sites able to

accommodate more than 1 match equivalent on any pitch and almost half of all pitches have no remaining capacity at peak time and

this shows that particularly at club bases that already host high quantities of play, facilities are starting to inhibit play. Only Bosworth

School, Dixie Grammar, Dovecote Pavilion, Hammonds Park, Hinckley Academy and Sketchley Hill Recreation Ground have any pitches

with capacity to sustain more than 1 match equivalent additional at peak time. The pressures on the existing pitch stock of even greater

concern given that grass pitch quality is approaching poor at a high number of sites. A reduction in capacity would have significant

consequences for the adequacy of provision.

Overall analysis therefore demonstrates that supply in the borough is very closely balanced with demand both across the week and at

peak time. The situation is particularly apparent for youth, 9v9 and 7v7 pitches, but even for adult and 5v5 pitches the amount of spare

capacity is relatively limited. There is however currently minimal overplay within the borough and where this exists, this is caused by

training on pitches as well as competitive activity. Almost all overplay is caused by high numbers of teams at key sites.

In addition to capacity pressures, quality issues are evident on sites across the borough with many suffering from poor and limited

maintenance regimes. There are particular concerns with compaction, drainage and undulation. Training contributes to much of the

overplay and is a significant factor in causing wear and tear on pitches. If training was moved onto AGP’s, demand for grass pitches

would reduce significantly outside of peak time.

Added to this, the reliance on school sites for competitive use exacerbates the pressures on pitch stock, and there would be insufficient

pitches at peak time to accommodate youth, 9v9 and 7v7 play if access to school facilities was lost.

Financial and budget concerns were highlighted as one of the key concerns by many clubs, and local authorities are also facing an era

of budgetary cuts and pressures to reduce services. With many pitches in the lower echelons of a standard rating, limited maintenance

procedures combined with poor weather conditions could cause several sites to become poor. If this occurred and the amount of


pitches available reduced by 25%, then pitch provision would become very closely matched with demand.

Affordability was seen as a key issue for clubs in ensuring ongoing growth in participation in football in the borough.

The FA vision (November 2014) which is the result of extensive analysis on the facilities used for football (including grass roots) placed

greater emphasis on the benefits of 3g pitches and their importance for the future delivery of football. This is also reflected in the FA

National Game Strategy 2015 - 2019 which seeks to provide better training and playing facilities and will also be a key theme of the

National Football Facility Strategy (soon to be released) 2019 - 2029 In particular, the FA cite the additional capacity that AGPs offer

compared to grass and their ability to sustain play during periods of inclement weather, resulting in a reduced number of cancellations.

FA data modelling therefore evaluates the baseline requirement for 3g pitches in Hinckley and Bosworth. It assumes that one 3g pitch is

required per 42 teams and that based on FA policy, all football training should take place on 3g pitches (as opposed to sand).

This would mean that there is a requirement for 5 full size AGPs in Hinckley and Bosworth. It is anticipated that the 2019 – 2029

Football Facilities Strategy that is soon to be released will increase the requirement for 3g AGPs further in urban areqs, with the ratio of

pitches to teams being reduced to 1:38. The target ratio will however remain the same in Hinckley and Bosworth. Population growth

(outlined later in this section) will see demand increase to 6 pitches.

The creation of further AGPs may reduce overuse of grass pitches rather than purely displace other activity. This is also supported by

club consultation, which indicates that there is a belief that there remain insufficient 3g AGPs in the borough. In terms of both

theoretical position and reality on the ground, there appears to be a need for additional 3g provision. To make better use of any AGP’s

provided, it would be necessary to re-programme fixtures in the local league, to ensure that league games would take place across the

weekend. Scenario testing indicates that the amount of pitches required to accommodate match play would be higher than needed for

training - to accommodate all football at peak time for 9v9, 7v7 and 5v5 there would need to be 11 AGP pitches provided. If fixtures

were reprogrammed however (with different age groups playing at different times), the number of AGP’s could be reduced.

Trends based population growth is predicted to decrease the number of adult football teams by almost 1. There will be an increase in

the number of youth teams by 1 while the number of 9v9 teams will remain static. The number of 5v5 teams will increase by 2, while

participation in 7v7 will increase by 1 team. These changes would see a small increase in the demand for football.

In addition to this, several clubs have significant aspirations for growth. Many of these clubs play at sites that are almost at capacity and


the majority of clubs are unable to accommodate the additional levels of play that they desire without access to further provision both

for training and at peak time.

Key Issues for

Strategy to

Address

There is a need to protect existing pitches if football participation is to be retained

There are high number of teams using pitches and this is generating overplay on some sites. This is particularly influenced by a lack of

training facilities. With only one 3g pitch in the Borough (and this largely unused), many teams are training on grass pitches. There is a

requirement for at least 5 full sized AGPs in total

The quality of facilities is deteriorating and many pitches are approaching poor standard – this will reduce capacity. There is evidence of

significant compaction (which is also causing drainage issues) and this can in part be attributed to the heavy usage, as well as limited

maintenance regimes. Changing facilities are also basic

Peak time demand is also high and there is limited remaining spare capacity. Many of the large clubs are already unable to accommodate

further play on their own site and facilities are starting to inhibit demand. There is a lack of hub sites and some clubs are dispersed

across multiple venues.

Clubs have aspirations for growth, but the lack of facilities means that this is becoming increasingly challenging. There is however a need

to ensure that provision remains accessible and affordable.

There are also concerns around the long term stability of the pitch stock, with a high proportion of pitches being located on school sites

where access is unsecured.