high speed rail study - department of infrastructure ... · high speed rail study phase 2 report...
TRANSCRIPT
High Speed Rail Study
Phase 2 Report
Key findings and Executive summary
In accordance with the east coast high speed rail (HSR) study terms of reference, AECOM and its sub-consultants (Grimshaw, KPMG, SKM, ACIL Tasman, Booz & Co and Hyder, hereafter referred to collectively as the Study Team) have prepared this report (Report). The Study Team has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Commonwealth Government: Department of Infrastructure and Transport (Client) and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the Report. No other party should rely on this Report or the information contain in it without the prior written consent of the Study Team.
The Study Team undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility or liability, to any third party who may rely upon or use this Report. The Study Team has prepared this Report based on the Client’s description of its requirements, exercising the degree of skill, care and diligence expected of a consultant performing the same or similar services for the same or similar study, and having regard to assumptions that the Study Team can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. The Study Team may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this Report, some of which may not have been verified or checked for accuracy, adequacy or completeness. The Report must not be modified or adapted in any way and may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety. Any third party that receives this Report, by their acceptance or use of it, releases the Study Team and its related entities from any liability for direct, indirect, consequential or special loss or damage whether arising in contract, warranty, express or implied, tort or otherwise, and irrespective of fault, negligence and strict liability.
The projections, estimation of capital and operational costs, assumptions, methodologies and other information in this Report have been developed by the Study Team from its independent research effort, general knowledge of the industry and consultations with various third parties (Information Providers) to produce the Report and arrive at its conclusions. The Study Team has not verified information provided by the Information Providers (unless specifically noted otherwise) and it assumes no responsibility nor makes any representations with respect to the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of such information. No responsibility is assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by Information Providers including, without limitation, inaccuracies in any other data source whether provided in writing or orally used in preparing or presenting the Report.
In addition, the Report is based upon information that was obtained on or before the date in which the Report was prepared. Circumstances and events may occur following the date on which such information was obtained that are beyond the Study Team’s control and which may affect the findings or projections contained in the Report, including but not limited to changes in ‘external’ factors such as changes in government policy; changes in law; fluctuations in market conditions, needs and behaviour; the pricing of carbon, fuel, products, materials, equipment, services and labour; financing options; alternate modes of transport or construction of other means of transport; population growth or decline; or changes in the Client’s needs and requirements affecting the development of the project. The Study Team may not be held responsible or liable for such circumstances or events and specifically disclaim any responsibility therefore.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / iii
OverviewA strategic study on the implementation of a High Speed Rail (HSR) network (the study) on the east coast of Australia between Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne was announced by the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, the Hon Anthony Albanese MP, in August 2010.
The study has been conducted in two phases. Phase 1, published in August 2011, identified a short-list of corridors and station options and estimated preliminary costs and demand for HSR on the east coast of Australia. Phase 2 built on phase 1, but was considerably broader and deeper in objectives and scope, and so refined many of the phase 1 estimates, particularly the demand and cost estimates. This phase 2 report presents detailed findings on the 12 advisory objectives established for the study.
Drawings and maps have been prepared for the purpose of depicting the recommended alignment for the HSR system and to enable civil construction cost estimates to be made.
Keyfindings
Key Findings
Definition of the preferred HSR system
The HSR network would comprise approximately 1,748 kilometres of dedicated route with four city centre stations, four city-peripheral stations (one in Brisbane, two in Sydney and one in Melbourne) and 12 regional stations.
• HSRwouldrequireadedicatedrailwaynetworktodeliverthenecessarylevelofsystemperformance,intermsofjourneytimeandreliability,tobecompetitivewithothermodesoftransport,particularly aviation.
To meet expected demand, the HSR system would offer a combination of services, including direct express services and limited stop services.
• Typicalexpressjourneytimeswouldbetwohoursand37minutesbetweenBrisbaneandSydney,onehourandfourminutesbetweenSydneyandCanberra,andtwohoursand44 minutesbetweenSydneyandMelbourne.
• TheHSRwouldoperatefrequentservicesbetweencapitalcitiesandregionalcentres.
• In2065,itisforecastthatpeakperioddemandforSydney-Melbournewouldbemetbytwonon-stopinter-capitalexpressservicesperhourperdirectionandthreeone-stopinter-capitalexpressservicesperhourperdirection,callingateitherSydneySouthorMelbourneNorthcityperipheralstations.
The dedicated HSR network would need to be integrated into the hubs of existing urban public transport systems and road networks to maximise its connectivity with other transport networks.
• Allcitycentrestationsmustbeintegratedwithotherpublictransportnetworksandthecity-peripheralstationsmusthavegoodaccesstomajorroadnetworks.
• Mostofthestationsonthenetworkwouldrequiresomelocalenhancementstopublictransportservices,parkingandinterchangearrangementstoensuregoodconnectivity.
Cost of constructing the HSR system
The estimated cost of constructing the preferred HSR alignment in its entirety would be about $114 billion (in 2012 terms), comprising $64 billion between Brisbane and Sydney and $50 billion between Sydney, Canberra and Melbourne.
• ThepreferredHSRalignmenthasbeendesignedfirstandforemosttomeetmarket needs(intermsofjourneytimesandreliability),whilealsobeingenvironmentallyandeconomically sustainable.
• Tunnellinghasbeenadoptedwherenodedicatedsurfaceroutecouldbecreatedwithoutunacceptabledislocationand/or
environmentalcosts.Tunnelsmakeup144kilometres(eightpercent)ofthepreferredalignmentandarethemostsignificantconstructioncostelement(29 percentoftotalconstructioncosts).AccesstoandfromSydneywouldrequirethemosttunnelling(67kilometres)comparedtoBrisbane(five kilometres),Melbourne(eightkilometres)andCanberra(fourkilometres).
• TheHSRsystemwouldadoptinternationallyprovenandavailabletechnologyfortrainsetsandassociatedsystems(suchastraincontrolandpowersupplysystems),whichwouldcostlessthanifacustomiseddesignwererequired.
Forecast HSR demand
Between 46 million and 111 million passengers are forecast to use HSR services for inter-city1 and regional trips2, if the preferred HSR network were fully operational in 2065, with a central forecast of 83.6 million passengers per year.
• By2065,HSRcouldattract40percentofinter-cityairtravelontheeastcoastand60percentofregionalairtravel(primarilylongregional).Onthethreemainsectors,Sydney-Melbourne,Sydney-BrisbaneandSydney-Canberra,HSRcouldattractmorethan50percentoftheairtravelmarket.
• Actualpassengernumberswoulddependontheratesofpopulationandeconomicgrowth,thelevelsofcongestionatairports,includingtravellingtoandfromairports,andthefares charged.
• Sydney-MelbourneisexpectedtobethelargestmarketforHSR,withabout19millionpassengertripsperyearforecast.Thisisconsiderablymorethanthenextlargestmarket,Brisbane-Sydney,withnearly
11millionpassengertripsperyear,andalmostfourtimesasmanyastheSydney-Canberramarket,withaboutfivemillionpassengertripsperyear.
• Inter-city andlongregionaltravel(>250km)areexpectedtoaccountfor49percentandapproximately36 percentoftotalpassengertripsand 62percentand35percentoftotalpassengerkilometrestravelledrespectively.Shortregionaltravel(<250km)wouldrepresent14 percentoftotaltrips,andonlyasmallpercentoftotalpassengerkilometrestravelled.Businesstravellerswouldaccountforabout35percentoftotaltripsand42percentoftotalpassengerkilometresontheentireHSRsystem.
• Forthepurposeofassessingdemand,averagefaresforbusinessandleisuretravelweresettobecomparableto,andcompetitivewith,airfareratesonthemaininter-capitalroutesontheeastcoast.Inpractice,arangeoffareswouldbeoffered,targetedtomarketsegmentsandinfluencedbyseatutilisationpatternsandcompetitivepressures,asiscurrentlythecasewiththeairlines.
Staging the development of HSR
The optimal staging for the HSR program would involve building the Sydney-Melbourne line first, starting with the Sydney-Canberra sector. Subsequent stages would be Canberra-Melbourne, Newcastle-Sydney, Brisbane-Gold Coast and Gold Coast-Newcastle.
• Internationalexperienceoflargeinfrastructuredevelopmentsshowsthatapproximatelytenyearscouldberequiredforplanning,consultationandenvironmentalapprovals,andfiveyearsforpreconstructionandprocurementactivities.
1 Theinter-citymarketisdefinedasjourneysover600kilometresbetweenthesixmaintownsandcitiesinthecorridorbasedonpopulation–Brisbane,GoldCoast,Newcastle,Sydney,CanberraandMelbourne.
2 Theregionalmarkethasbeenbrokenintolongregionaltripsgreaterthan250kilometres,whichincludesSydney-Canberra,andshortregionaltripslessthan250kilometres,whichincludesBrisbane-GoldCoastandNewcastle-Sydney.
Key Findings
Table1 Commencementandoperationalmilestonesforoptimalstaging
Stage Main construction commences
Operations commence
Sydney-Melbourne line
Sydney-Canberra 2027 2035Canberra-Melbourne 2032 2040Brisbane-Sydney line
Newcastle-Sydney 2037 2045Brisbane-GoldCoast 2043 2051GoldCoast-Newcastle 2048 2058
• Somepreliminary(‘enabling’)workstoenableconstructionoftheHSRatSydneyCentralstation(e.g.movingplatformsandutilities)wouldbeundertakenbefore2027.
• ConstructionofthewholeHSRsystemwouldtakearound30years.
• TheSydney-MelbournelinehasstrongerforecastdemandthantheBrisbane-Sydneyline,wouldbelessexpensivetobuildandispredictedtohavehighereconomicandfinancialreturns.Itshouldthereforebecompletedfirst.
• ThepreferredstagingofconstructionfortheBrisbane-Sydneyline(Newcastle-Sydney,Brisbane-GoldCoastandthenGoldCoast-Newcastle)reflectsbothmarketdemandandeconomiccharacteristics.
• Forthepurposeofevaluation,thestudyassumedtheinitialstagebetweenSydneyandCanberrawouldoperatefrom2035,withtheSydney-Melbournelineoperationalfrom2040.
Table2 Commencementandoperationalmilestonesforacceleratedstaging
Main construction Operations Stage commences commence
Sydney-Melbourne line
Sydney-Canberra 2022(earliestpossiblestart) 2030Canberra-Melbourne 2027 2035Brisbane-Sydney line
Newcastle-Sydney 2032 2040Brisbane-GoldCoast 2038 2046GoldCoast-Newcastle 2043 2053
• Brisbane-GoldCoastwouldbecompletedin 2051.
• GoldCoast-Newcastlewouldbethelaststagetobebuilt,withthecompleteBrisbane-Melbournelineoperationalby2058.
It is possible the program could be accelerated, with the Sydney-Melbourne line operational by 2035. In this case the Sydney-Canberra stage could be operational by 2030.
• Assumingfunding,financingandallrelevantapprovalswereinplaceandpreliminarydesignhadbeencompleted,theearliestthatmainconstructionworkcouldreasonablystartwouldbe2022.
• Bringingtheprogramforwardwouldreducetheeconomicbenefits,primarilybecausethemarketvolumeswouldbelowerwhenoperationsbegan.
Financial assessment
The HSR program and the majority of its individual stages are expected to produce only a small positive financial return on investment.
• ThedistributionoftheeconomicbenefitsofHSRbetweenusersofthesystemandtheoperator(s)woulddependontheprices charged.
• Basedonchargingcompetitivefares,theHSRoperationsandancillaryservices(suchascarparkingandleaserevenuesfromrelatedpropertydevelopment)wouldnotdeliversufficientrevenuetofundorrecovertheexpectedcapitalcostsoftheHSRprogram.
Governments would be required to fund the majority of the upfront capital costs.
• Thepotentialtoattractprivatefinanceislimited.Anexpectedreturnofatleast15percentwouldberequiredatthisstageofprojectdevelopmenttobeattractivetocommercialprovidersofdebtandequitytomajorinfrastructureprojects.HSRwouldfallwellshortofthis.
• Theestimatedrealfinancialinternalrateofreturn(FIRR)is1.0percentforSydney-Melbourneand0.8percentforthewholenetwork.
• Ifpotentialcommercialfundingweremaximised,afundinggapintheorderof$98billion,or86 percentoftheup-frontcapitalcostoftheHSRprogram,wouldremain.
If HSR passenger projections were met at the fare levels proposed, the HSR system, once operational, could generate sufficient fare revenue and other revenue to meet operating costs without ongoing public subsidy.
• Postconstruction,theHSRprogramasawhole,andeachofitssectors(withtheexceptionofSydney-Canberraasastand-alonesector)areexpectedtogeneratesufficientoperatingincometocovertheirongoingoperationalandassetrenewalcosts.
HSR fares adopted for the study have been assumed to be comparable to air fares on the inter-capital routes, and it would appear HSR could sustain higher fares.
• Increasingthecostoffareswouldincreasethefinancialreturnsandreducethefundinggap,althoughdoingsowouldreducethenumberofpeopleusingthesystem.Evenso,theeconomicbenefitsoftheprogramwouldremainpositive.
• GiventhatairfaresinAustraliaarealreadyhighlycompetitiveonmajorroutes,itisnotexpectedthatairlineswouldrespondtoHSRcompetitionbyreducingfaresonasustainedbasis.Ithasbeenassumed,inlinewithinternationalexperience,thatairlineswouldquicklyreducecapacity,eitherbyreducingfrequenciesoraircraftsizes,tolocationswithintheHSRcorridorwherethereissignificantpassengerdiversiontoHSR.ItislikelythatanyreductionincapacitywouldberedeployedtoroutesoutsidetheHSRcorridor.
• Nevertheless,totheextentthatairlinesareabletoinnovateinwaysthathavenotbeenanticipatedinthisstudy,therewouldbeanimpactonHSRpatronageandcapacitytomeetoperatingcosts.Thesensitivitytestsincludedonescenarioinwhichairfareswerereducedby50percentfortwoyears.
Key Findings
Economic assessment
Investment in a future HSR program could deliver positive net economic benefits.
• TheSydney-Melbournelinewoulddeliveraslightlyhighereconomicinternalrateofreturn(EIRR)oninvestmentthanthewholenetworkwould.TheEIRRofSydney-Melbourneisestimatedat7.8percent,comparedto7.6 percentforaninvestmentinthestagedHSRprogramasawhole.
• Theeconomicbenefitcostratio(EBCR)calculatestheratioofthepresentvalueofbenefitstothepresentvalueofcosts.Whencalculatedusingadiscountrateoffourpercent,theECBRis2.5forSydney-Melbourneand2.3forthewholenetwork.
• Theeconomicnetpresentvalue(ENPV)ofcostsandbenefitsassociatedwithaprogramofinvestmentinthepreferredHSRsystemwouldbe$70billionforSydney-Melbourneand$101 billionforthenetworkasawhole,
calculatedusingadiscountrateoffourpercentayearuntilthestartofconstructionin2027(financialyear2028),andexpressedin $2012.
• Theeconomicresultsremainpositiveunderarangeofchangedassumptions.Whencalculatedusingasevenpercentdiscountrate,whichrepresentsahigherhurdlerateforjudgingeconomicperformance,theEBCRwouldbe1.1andtheENPVwouldbe$5 billion.
• Mostoftheeconomicbenefits(90percent)wouldaccruetotheusersoftheHSRsystem.Abouttwo-thirdsoftheuserbenefitsareattributabletobusinessuserstravellinglongdistances,whichreflectsinparttherelativelyhighervalueoftimeattributedtobusinesstravellerscomparedtoleisuretravellers.
• Externalitieswouldberelativelyminor,accountingforonlyaboutthreepercentofthe benefits.
Environmental and social assessment
The preferred HSR alignment has been selected to avoid major environmental and social impacts. The residual impacts on natural environments and heritage can be managed by appropriate mitigation and, where necessary, offsets.
• Potentialsignificantimpactsinurbanareas,suchasnoiseandlargescalepropertyacquisition,havelargelybeenavoidedbytheuseoftunnellingontheapproachestocapital cities.
Broader impacts of HSR
Aligning public policies, programs and capabilities across Australian Government, state/territory government and local government agencies as part of a corridor regional development concept would be necessary to realise the full benefits of HSR.
• TheimplementationofHSRwouldsubstantiallyimproveaccessibilityfortheregionalcentresthatitserves,providingtheopportunityfor–butnottheautomaticrealisationof–increasedregionaleconomicdevelopment.Theabilityofthese
centrestotakeadvantageoftheopportunitiescreatedbyimprovedaccessibilitywouldrequirecoordinatedandcomplementarypoliciestobeimplemented.
• Emerginginternationalevidencesuggeststhatwidereconomicbenefitsmaybegeneratedbyregionalaccessibilityimprovements,butthequantitativeestimatesareneithersufficientlycertainnorrobustforinclusioninthemaineconomicassessment.
Implementing a future HSR program
Both the public and private sectors would play a significant role in the planning and implementation of a future HSR system.
• GovernmentswouldneedtohaveacentralroleintheplanninganddevelopmentoftheHSRsystem,includingsecuringthenecessaryapprovals.TheprimarypublicsectorroleswouldbeexecutedthroughasingleHSRdevelopment authority.
• AsHSRwouldbepredominantlypubliclyfunded,theAustralian,ACTandrelevantstategovernmentswouldbetheownersofthesystemandwouldassumethekeyroleinthespecificationandprocurementofnetworkinfrastructure,theallocationofitscapacityfortransportservicesandthespecificationofminimumservicerequirements.
• TheprivatesectorwouldberesponsibleforbuildingtheHSRinfrastructureundercontract
totheHSRdevelopmentauthority,andforthedeliveryoftrainservicestothepublic.Controlofthemovementoftrainsandmaintenanceofinfrastructurewouldalsobetheroleoftheprivatesector,undercompetitivelytenderedconcession arrangements.
The key risks to the HSR program and its successful performance are common to all major greenfield infrastructure projects; most notably, a lack of certainty about future demand and revenues, and the potential for cost over-runs during construction.
• Allowanceforriskanduncertaintyhasbeenincludedinthedemand,economicandfinancialassessments,buttheriskscannotbeperfectlycontrolledandaprogramofthisnature,particularlyextendingoveralongperiodoftime,containssignificant uncertainties.
Key Findings
Key public policy issues for a decision to proceed
Whether to proceed with planning for a future HSR program must necessarily be a policy decision, taking account of many factors that cannot be known with certainty, and in the context of risks which cannot be perfectly controlled.
• ThisstudyestimatesthatHSRwouldhavepositiveneteconomicbenefits,usingtheAustralianTransportCouncil’scost-benefitmethodologyguidelines,whichareconventionallyappliedtomajortransportinfrastructureprojects.However,thisappraisalextendsto2085,anecessarilydistanttimehorizonforprogramdeliveryandmarketimpactcomparedtomostinfrastructurefeasibilitystudies.
• Thelong-termfutureisinherentlyuncertainandrequirescautionwhenmakingajudgement,butitismostlikelythatdemographicandeconomictrendswillsupportasteadilyimprovingcaseforHSRontheeastcoastratherthanotherwise.Inthatcase,policy-makers,whetherornotyetconvincedofthemeritsofcommittingtoHSR,mayalsolegitimatelyweighthepossibleconsequencesofnottakingactionstopreservethatoptionatsometimeinthefuture.
• Inthisregard,inactionisnotbenign.Intheabsenceofaprotectedroute,thespreadofcitiesandotherdevelopmentsinthepreferredcorridorwillgraduallyreducetheconstructabilityandincreasethepotentialcapitalcostsofafutureHSRprogram,renderingitincreasinglymoredifficulttoimplement,evenwhilethefundamentaltrendsmaybecomeincreasinglyfavourable.
As in all publicly-funded infrastructure projects, the balance between public benefit and public cost should be considered.
• ThepositiveeconomicperformancethatisestimatedtobeachievablefromaninvestmentinHSR,mostofwhichwoulddirectlybenefittheusersofthesystem,contrastswithlowfinancialreturns,whichwouldneedtobesupportedbypublicfunding.Althoughthisistrueofmanytransportinfrastructureprojects,includingnationalhighways,itisanissuethatmustbeconfronted.
• TheexternalbenefitsofHSR-fewerroadaccidents,reducedroadcongestionandsoon–whichmightcontributetoitsrationale,wouldbepositivebutareestimatedtofallfarshortofthepublicfundingrequired.
• Bycontrast,theopportunitiesforurbanandregionaldevelopmentintheHSRcorridorwillbeconsideredbymanypeopleinAustraliatohaveahighpotentialvalueinpublicpolicyterms,butthosebenefitsdonotfollowautomaticallyorwithcertainty.Therewouldneedtobeconfidencethattheywouldbeactivelyexploitedandrealisedtojustifyanygreatweightinthedecisiononwhethertoproceed.Thatinturnwouldrequirepolicycommitmentatalllevelsofgovernmenttopursuinganintegratedcorridordevelopmentstrategy,synchronisedwiththedeliveryoftheHSRprogram.
A related policy issue is the extent to which the initial capital costs of an HSR program should be recovered from users.
• Taxpayerswouldneedtomakeasubstantialcontributiontotheup-frontcostsofestablishinganHSRsystem.Theanalysissuggeststhatcharginghigherfaresthanthoseassumedwouldbefeasible,andwouldimprovefinancialreturns,butwouldreduceoveralleconomicbenefitsasfewerpeoplewouldusethesystem.
• Whileeconomicprinciplessuggestthatthecommunity’seconomicwelfareisbestpursuedbychargingusersonlythemarginalcostofinfrastructure,establishingthebalancebetweenrecoveryofpublicinvestmentininfrastructureandmaximisingitseconomicbenefitsisultimatelyapolicymatter.
• IfanHSRprogramwereadopted,therewouldneedtobeanup-frontunderstandingofwhatprincipleswouldbeappliedtoinfrastructurepricingandcostrecovery.Certainly,ifpassengernumbersweretogrowovertime,governmentswouldbeinapositiontobegintorecoversomeproportionofitscapitalinvestment.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 1
ES
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 3
The expected growth in travel demandPopulationandemploymentgrowthwillcontinuetochallengethecapacityofexistingtransportnetworksandpublicinfrastructurealongtheeastcoastofAustralia1.TravelontheeastcoastofAustraliaisforecasttogrowataround1.8percentperyearoverthenext20years,increasingbyapproximately60percentby2035.By2065,travelontheeastcoastwillhavemorethandoubled,from152milliontripsin2009to355milliontripsperyear2.
WithoutHSR,aviationwouldremaintheprimarymeansoftransportforlongdistanceinterstate(andsomeinter-regional)tripsandroad-basedtravelbyprivatevehiclewouldremaintheprimarymodeforconnectionswith,andbetween,regionalcentres.Togetherthesewouldcarryover90percentofthetripsontheeastcoast,subjecttocapacitybeingavailable.
ThisstrategicstudyinvestigateshowHSRcanplayaneffectiveroleinmeetingfuturetraveldemandbyprovidinganalternativemodeoftransportthatwouldbeattractiveforpeopletouse.
1 AustralianBureauofStatistics(ABS)mid-rangepopulationprojectionsestimatethatbetween2011and2050,thepopulationwillgrowby37percentinNSW,49percentinVictoriaand80percentinQueensland.ABS,PopulationProjectionsAustralia2006to2101,catalogueno.3222.0.
2 SeeChapter 2fordetailofhowtheseforecastsweredetermined.
Executive summary
Executive Summary
What is HSR?HSRisgenerallydefinedasapurpose-built,fixed-trackmodeoftransport,capableofmovingpeopleatspeedsofatleast250kilometresperhour,usuallyoverlongdistances.Internationally,ittypicallyoffersservicesbetweenmajorcities,competinginthesametravelmarketasaviation,butalsoprovidesopportunitiesforintermediatestopsinregionalareasandfastcommuterrailservicesfromoutermetropolitanareas.HSRstationsaretypicallylocatedwithincitycentres,closetopopulationandbusinesscentres.
OriginatinginJapaninthe1960s,HSRsystemsnowoperatein14countries3.Totalglobalkilometresoftrackhaveincreasedfromjustover1,000kilometresin1980,to15,000kilometresin20114.Chinaiscurrentlyconstructinganadditional10,000kilometresofHSRnetwork5.
MostHSRsystemsoperateondedicatedtracksatamaximumspeedofbetween250and300kilometresperhour,withsomesystemsnowoperatinginexcessof300kilometresperhour6.SomeHSRservicesalsousesectionsofconventionaltracksatlowerspeeds,eitheronentrytocitiesortoextendbeyondadedicatedline7.AllcurrentHSRsystemsuseconventionalsteelwheelsonrailsandarepoweredbyelectrictraction,althoughthereareseveralvariantsintermsofrollingstockandinfrastructure.
Definition of the preferred HSR systemHSR alignment and station locationsThepreferredHSRrouteontheeastcoastofAustraliahasbeendevelopedfirstandforemosttomeetmarketneeds(intermsofjourneytimesandreliability),whilealsobeingenvironmentallyandeconomicallysustainable.Theroute,illustratedinFigure ES-1,broadlyfollowsacoastalalignmentbetweenBrisbaneandSydneyfollowedbyaninlandalignmentfromSydneytoMelbourne,withspurlinestotheGoldCoastandCanberra.
CitycentrestationswouldbeterminalstationswithintheCBDsofthecapitalcities.Theselocationsarethesinglemostimportantoriginanddestinationineachcityandprovidereadyaccessto,andintegratewith,othermetropolitantransportservices.CBDstationswouldbelocatedbeneaththeBrisbaneTransitCentreinBrisbaneandontheeasternfringeofCivicinCanberra,andwouldshareexistingstationsatCentralinSydneyandSouthernCrossinMelbourne.Eachofthethreemaincapitalcities(Sydney,MelbourneandBrisbane)wouldalsohaveaperipheralstation(inSydney’scaseitwouldhavetwo–onetothenorthandonetothesouthoftheurbanarea),forpassengerswhowouldfinditmoreconvenienttoaccessHSRwithouthavingtotravelintooroutoftheCBD.
TheminimumcorridorwidthrequiredtoaccommodatetwodedicatedHSRtracksis30metres.Thisrepresentsarefinementofthephase1evaluation,whichwasbasedona200 metrewidthtoensurethatanysignificantissueswerecapturedwhencomparinginitialcorridoroptions.The30metrewidthdoesnotincludetheadditionalwidthrequiredforembankmentsorcuttingsnecessarytomaintainthesmoothverticalalignmentrequiredforHSR.
Inmanydevelopedurbanareas,surfacealignmentswouldnotpermitcompetitiveaccesstimestothecitycentresforHSRserviceswithoutmajordislocationoftheurbanpopulationand,insuchcases,thealignmentwouldbeplacedintunnel.Sectionsoftheregionalalignmentwouldalsobebuiltintunneloronviaductstoavoidbuilt-uporenvironmentallysensitiveareas.Althoughtunnelsaddtothecapitalcost,theywouldallowtheinfrastructuretobedeliveredinawaythatminimisesanypotentialnegativeimpactsonthecommunityandenvironmentduringconstructionandoperation,andminimisesdelaysanddifficultiesduringconstruction.
3 Japan,Italy,France,Germany,Spain,Switzerland,Belgium,Netherlands,Luxembourg,China,UnitedKingdom,Korea,TaiwanandTurkey.
4 DerivedfromTheWorldBank,High speed rail: the fast track to economic development?,2010(updated).5 ZhangJianping,Planning and Development of High Speed Rail Network in China,UIC8thWorldCongressonHighSpeed
Rail,2012.6 Forexample,bothFranceandSpainoperateserviceswithspeedsofover300kilometresperhourincommercialservice.7 ParticularlyinFranceandGermanyand,toalimitedextent,inJapanandChina.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 5
RegionalstationswereselectedonthebasisofpotentialpatronageandhavebeenproposedattheGoldCoast,Casino,Grafton,CoffsHarbour,PortMacquarie,Taree,Newcastle,CentralCoast,SouthernHighlands,WaggaWagga,Albury-WodongaandShepparton.Tominimisecostand
avoiddisruptiontobuilt-upareas,thesestationswouldbelocatedoutsidethecurrenturbanareas,althoughtheywouldtypicallybewithintento20kilometresofthetowncentreandwouldhavebothcarparkingfacilitiesandfacilitiestointerchangewithlocalpublictransportservices.
FigureES-1 PreferredHSRalignmentandstationsfortheeastcoastofAustralia
QLD
NSW
VIC
ACT
SYDNEY
BRISBANE
CANBERRA
MELBOURNE
KEY Station locationsState border Not to scale
LINE 1
LINE 2
Taree
Newcastle
Central Coast
Southern Highlands
Casino
Grafton
Coffs Harbour
Port Macquarie
Wagga Wagga
Shepparton
Albury-Wodonga
Gold Coast
Figure ES-1
Executive Summary
Types of HSR servicesThemarketassessmentshowedstrongdemandontheeastcoast,nowandintothefuture,forhighspeedtravelbetweenthecapitalcitiesandtoandfromregionalcentres.ThepreferredHSRsystemwouldthereforeoffertwotypesofservices:• Inter-capitalexpressservices,mostlyoperating
non-stopbetweenthecapitalcitycentralstationsbutwithsomealsostoppingatthecityperipheralstations.
• Inter-capitalregionalservicesofferinghighspeedservicesbetweenthecapitalcitiesandmajorregionalcentres.Regionalserviceswouldalsofacilitatetravelbetweenregionalstations,althoughsomeinter-regionalmovementswithlowdemandmayrequirepassengerstochangefromoneservicetoanotheratanintermediatestationtocompletetheirjourney.
Ifbuilt,thesystemwouldalsohavethecapacitytoaccommodatefastcommuterrailservicesbetweenthecapitalcitiesandtheirnearerregionalcentres(suchastheCentralCoastandNewcastleinNSW),manyofwhichcurrentlyhaverelativelyslow,ifany,services.Commuterserviceswouldprobablybeoperatedbythirdparties.TheyhavebeenallowedforinthephysicalplanningbuttheywouldnotpositivelycontributetothefinancialperformanceofHSR,norwouldtheybethesourceofanysignificantincrementaleconomicbenefitinthecost-benefitanalysisofHSR.Commuterdemandwasthereforeexcludedfromtheeconomicandfinancialappraisals.
HSR service characteristicsAustralianmarketresearchandinternationalexperiencehaveindicatedthatHSRwouldneedtooffercompetitivedoor-to-doorjourneytimes,highstandardsofcomfortandconvenienceandacompetitivefarestructuretosuccessfullycompetewithothermodesoftransport,especiallyair.HSRcoulddelivernon-stopjourneytimesunderthreehourscitycentretocitycentre,betweenBrisbaneandSydneyandSydneyandMelbourne,asshowninFigure ES-2andTable ES-1andTable ES-2.
FigureES-2 HSRtraveltimesbetweenmajorcities
Not to scaleKEYHSR preferred alignmentState border
Newcastle
Gold CoastQLD
NSW
VIC
ACT
SYDNEY
BRISBANE
MELBOURNE
CANBERRA
NEWCASTLE TO SYDNEY
39 mins
SYDNEY TO BRISBANE
2 hrs 37 mins
SYDNEY TO MELBOURNE
2 hrs 44 minsSYDNEY TO CANBERRA
64 mins
RoadsStation locations
Inter-capital express
Inter-capital regional
Inter-capital regional
The operation of a combination of HSR services, including
express services and regional services.
Figure ES-2
Executive Summary
TableES-1 TypicalHSRtraveltimesanddistancesbetweenselectedstationsonBrisbane-Sydneyline
igin
Or
Destination
Coffs Central Newcastle SydneyHarbour Coast
Regional Regional Regional Express Regional
1hr11min* 2hr28min 2hr43min 2hr37min 3hr09minBrisbane (332km) (662km) (714km) (797km) (797km)
1hr09min 1hr30min 1hr50minCoffs Harbour -(330km) (382km) (465km)
0hr14min 0hr39minNewcastle -(52km) (134km)
0hr27minCentral Coast - (83km)
*Withonestop.Onehour23minuteswiththreestops.Note:Distancesmaynotaddduetorounding.
TableES-2 TypicalHSRtraveltimesanddistancesbetweenselectedstationsonSydney-Melbourneline
Ori
gin
Destination
Southern Albury-Canberra MelbourneHighlands Wodonga
Regional Express Regional Regional Express Regional
0hr29min 1hr04min 1h11min 1hr55min 2hr44min 3hr03minSydney (98km) (280km) (280km) (540km) (824km) (824km)
Southern 0hr39min 1h31min* 2hr29min- -Highlands (183km) (442km) (727km)
1hr16min 2hr10min 2hr28minCanberra (366km) (651km) (651km)
Albury- 1hr09min-Wodonga (284km)
*PlusinterchangetimeatWaggaWagga.Note:Distancesmaynotaddduetorounding.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 7 High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 9
Serviceswouldtypicallyoperate18hoursperdayfor365daysperyear.Servicefrequencieswouldtypicallybeatleasthourly,increasingasdemandgrewtoreachpeakperiodservicefrequenciesin2065,asshowninTable ES-3.
Ultimately,trainfrequencieswouldbeinfluencedbyfuturemarketneedsandthepreferredtrainoperatingstrategy(operatingspeedsandstoppingpatterns)buttheindicativefrequenciesestablishedforthisstudyarecompatiblewiththeforecastdemandandefficienttrainutilisation.
TableES-3 Peakservicefrequenciesin2065(perhourineachdirection)
Route Inter-capital express Inter-capital regional
Brisbane-Sydney
Gold Coast-Sydney
Sydney-Canberra
Sydney-Melbourne
Canberra-Melbourne
3-4 2
- 4
1 2
5 2
1 1
Fareswouldbestructuredtobecompetitivewithalternativemodesoftransport.Forthepurposesofthemaindemandassessment,averagefaresforbusinessandleisuretravelweredesignedtobecomparableto,andcompetitivewith,airfaresonthemaininter-capitalroutesontheeastcoast,takingintoaccountthetypesoffarestypicallypurchasedbythedifferenttypesofpassenger8.Inpractice,arangeoffareswouldbeoffered,targetedtomarketsegmentsandinfluencedbyseatutilisationpatternsandcompetitivepressures,asiscurrentlythecasewiththeairlines.
Forecast HSR demand AnHSRsystemwouldsignificantlyincreaselongandmedium-distancetransportcapacityontheeastcoastofAustraliaandwouldprovideanalternativemodeoftransportthat,accordingtomarketresearchandsupportedbyinternationalevidence,wouldbeattractivetomanytravellers.IfthecompleteHSRnetworkwasfullyoperational,thestudypredictsthat,underthereferencecaseassumptions9,itcouldattractapproximately83.6 millionpassengertripsby2065,asshowninTable ES-4.Figure ES-3illustratesthemaininter-citypassengertripflows.
8 Forexample,theaverageHSRsinglefaresassumedinthereferencecasebetweenSydneyandMelbournewere$141fortheaveragebusinesspassengerand$86fortheaverageleisurepassengerbutsensitivitytestsalsoconsideredfaresupto30percentand50percentgreater.Thecorrespondingaveragefarespaidbyairpassengerswereestimatedas$137and$69respectively.
9 Thereferencecaseispartofthecentralcaseestablishedforevaluation.
Executive Summary
FigureES-3 HSRtraveldemandin2065betweenmajorcities–passengertrips
Not to scale
Newcastle
Gold CoastQLD
NSW
VIC
ACT
SYDNEY
BRISBANE
MELBOURNE
CANBERRA
SYDNEY TO CENTRAL COAST/NEWCASTLE
4.75 million
SYDNEY TO BRISBANE
10.86 million
SYDNEY TO MELBOURNE
18.76 millionSYDNEY TO CANBERRA
5.19 million
KEYHSR preferred alignmentState border Roads
Station locations
Figure ES-3
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 11
TableES-4 HSRtravelmarketfor2065
Total travel market (inter-city and regional)
Trips without HSR (million) 355
Trips with HSR (million)* 389
HSR travel market (inter-city and regional)
HSR trips (million) 83.6
HSR passenger kilometres (billion) 53.1
*IncludesnewdemandinducedbytheconstructionofHSR.Assumesthefullsystemisoperational.
AsetofalternativeassumptionsproducedforecastsforHSRin2065,assumingafullsystemweretobeoperational,ofbetween46millionand111millionpassengertrips.Thealternativeassumptionsincludedvariationsinpopulationandeconomicgrowth,increasesinairportcapacityatSydney(andhenceimprovementsintheaviationlevelofservice)andvariationsinHSRfaresrelativetotheprojectedairfaresandcarrunningcosts.
ForecastHSRtraveldemandbyjourneytypeinthereferencecaseispresentedinFigure ES-4(forpassengertrips)andFigure ES-5(forpassengerkilometres).Travelforbusinessaccountsfor35percentofforecastHSRpatronage,withinter-citybusinesstravelbeingthemostimportant10.Inter-citytravelwouldmakeupabout49percentoftotalpassengertripsand62percentofpassengerkilometres.Regionaltravelwouldrepresentabout50percentoftotalpassengertripsand38percentofpassengerkilometres.
10 Inter-citytripsaredefinedasjourneysover600kilometresbetweenthesixmaintownsandcitiesinthecorridorbasedonpopulation(Brisbane,GoldCoast,Newcastle,Sydney,CanberraandMelbourne).Regionaltripshavebeenbrokenintolongregionaltripsofgreaterthan250kilometres,whichincludesSydney-Canberra,andshortregionaltripsoflessthan250kilometres,whichincludesBrisbane-GoldCoastandNewcastle-Sydney.
Executive Summary
FigureES-4 HSRtraveldemandin2065byjourneytype(assumingthefullHSRnetworkwasoperational)–passengertrips
Figure ES-4 Passenger Trips
Inter-city non-business Inter-city business Long regional non-business
Long regional business Short regional non-business Short regional business
1%
13% 24%
25%
27%
9%
Note:Totaldoesnotaddto100%duetorounding.
FigureES-5 HSRtraveldemandin2065byjourneytype(assumingthefullHSRnetworkwasoperational)–passengerkilometres
Inter-city non-business Inter-city business Long regional non-business
Long regional business Short regional non-business Short regional business
<1%
2%
9%29%
33%
26%
Figure ES-5Passenger Kms
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 13
Table ES-5showstheforecasttravelmatrixforthereferencecasein2065whenthefullnetworkwouldbeoperational.Intermediatestationsbetweencapitalcentresareaggregatedforpresentationpurposes.Excludingcommutermarkets,Sydney-MelbourneisthelargestmarketsegmentforHSRwithabout19 millionpassengertrips,considerablymorethanthenextlargest,Brisbane-Sydney,withnearly11 millionpassengertripsandalmostfourtimesSydney-Canberra,withaboutfivemillionpassengertrips.
Sometravelwasomittedfromthematrixbecauseitcoveredonlyashortdistance,orwouldbebestservedbycar,implyingthatfewsuchjourneyswouldbelikelytotransfertoHSR.Thisincludedalltravelwhollywithineachoftheintermediate
areas,otherthanthattoandfromWollongong.AsmallproportionoftheomittedlongertripscoulduseHSR,andtothisextent,theHSRforecastsareconservative.Tripstoandfromplacesexternaltothestudyareawerealsoexcluded.TheexcludedtripsreferredtoaboveareshownbyanXinthetable.
AbouthalfoftheHSRdemandwouldbedivertedfromforecastairtravelasshowninFigure ES-6.About19percentoftotaltripswouldbenewdemandgeneratedbytheintroductionofanHSRservice(shownasinduceddemand).
TableES-5 HSRtravelmarketmatrixfor2065(‘000tripsinbothdirectionsperyear)
Sect
ors
Brisbane
Gold Coast
Intermediate
Newcastle
Intermediate
Sydney
Intermediate
Canberra
Intermediate
Melbourne
Total
Bri
sban
e
Go
ld C
oas
t
Inte
rmed
iate
New
cast
le
Inte
rmed
iate
Syd
ney
Inte
rmed
iate
Can
ber
ra
Inte
rmed
iate
Mel
bo
urne
Tota
lX 2,210 1,650 750 600 10,860 1,240 1,130 730 2,490 X 900 520 580 3,830 610 190 440 340 X 810 X 5,500 190 330 X 850 X 170 1,760 220 250 150 330 X 2,990 20 300 X 730 X 2,690 5,190 2,290 18,760 80 480 100 2,320 X 640 2,720 X 4,660 X
83,600*
*Cellsmaynotexactlysumtothetotalduetorounding.
Executive Summary
FigureES-6 SourceofHSRtraveldemandin2065byjourneytype(passengertrips)
All
Business
Non-business
Air Coach Car Rail Induced
1%
2%
55%
19%
23%
<1%66%
24%
9%
49%
17%
30%
2%
2%
<1%
Figure ES-6
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 15
HowthetotalHSRandairmarketwouldbesharedbetweenthetwomodesoftransportisakeyissueinthedemandassessment.ConsiderableevidencehasbeenassembledintheinternationalliteratureontheimpactsofHSRoninter-capitalairtravelinEuropeandEastAsia.InFigure ES-7,theinternationalmarketsarerepresentedbythebluedots,whichshowtheproportionofthecombinedairandHSRtravelmarketcapturedbyHSRonselectedroutes.ForHSRjourneytimesoflessthantwohours,thisistypicallyover80percent,whereasifHSRjourneytimesexceedfourandahalfhours,theHSRsharefallsbelow30percent.Fortripsofuptothreehours(asforSydney-
MelbourneandSydney-Brisbane),observedHSRmarketsharesrangefromaround55percentuptoaround70percent.
Thisstudy’sreferencecaseinter-capitalforecastsfor2035havebeenincludedinthefigureforcomparisonandshowahighdegreeofconsistencywiththeinternationalexperience.Sydney-Canberraislowerthantheexpectedrangeforjourneyslessthantwohours,butthisislargelyexplainedbytherelativelyhighproportionofpassengerstransferringtoconnectingflights,whichareassumedintheforecastsnottodiverttoHSR.
FigureES-7 HSRshareofcombinedHSR/airtravelmarket,comparingthefinalmodelforecastfor2035withinternationalevidence
HSR
mod
e sh
are
(%)
HSR in-vehicle time (mins)
Sydney–Canberra
Canberra–Melbourne
Brisbane–Sydney
Sydney–Melbourne
Brisbane–Melbourne
10%
0%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
International evidence Model forecasts for 2035
Figure ES-7
Executive Summary
Cost of constructing the HSR networkInternationally,HSRsystemsareveryreliablewhentheyoperateasclosedsystemsdedicatedtohighspeedserviceswithpurpose-builtinfrastructureandtrainsets.AlthoughmixingHSRserviceswithconventionalrailservicesonsharedinfrastructuremayreducecapitalcosts,particularlyforaccessintotheurbanareas,operationalperformancecandiminishdramatically.SuchsystemsaregenerallynotcapableofdeliveringthejourneytimesthatwouldbenecessaryforanHSRsystemontheeastcoastofAustraliatoachievetherequiredlevelsofreliabilityandcompetitiveness.
ToachievethetargetjourneytimeofunderthreehoursforSydney-MelbourneandBrisbane- Sydney,anaveragejourneyspeedofapproximately300 kilometresperhourwouldneedtobeachieved.Thiswouldrequireasystemcapableofamaximumoperatingspeedof350kilometresperhour,toallowforsomeslowersectionsoftrackduetoterrainorotheroperatingconditions.SuchaveragespeedswouldnotbepossibleontheexistingconventionalrailinfrastructureontheeastcoastofAustralia,evenifitwasonlyusedforshortsectionsforcityaccessandegress,sodedicatedHSRinfrastructurewouldberequired.IftheHSRnetworkwereusedtoprovidefastcommuterservices,itislikelytheywouldnotoperateatsuchhighspeeds;amaximumoperatingspeedof200- 250kilometresperhourwouldeffectivelyservethecommutermarket,giventherelativelyshorterdistancesandmoreintensivestoppingpatternsoffastcommuterservices.
Inadditiontothephysicalcomponentsofcapitalcost(land,earthworks,structures,track,equipmentandfacilities),thecostestimatesalsoincludedesign,programandconstructionmanagement,andassetrenewalwhenitwouldfalldue.CostcomponentsweredevelopedfromAustralianunitcostsandbenchmarkedagainstinternationalHSRsystemstoensuretherobustnessoftheestimates.Rollingstock(trainsets)isequivalenttoafurtherninepercentofthetotalcapitalcost,butthiswouldonlybeexpendedasdemandbuiltupovertheappraisalperiodandservicefrequenciesincreased.
Tunnellingwouldbeusedwheretheterrainrequiresit,butwouldalsobeadoptedwherenodedicatedsurfaceroutecouldbecreatedwithoutunacceptablecommunitydislocationand/orenvironmentalcosts.Thisisparticularlythecasewheretheroutepassesthroughthemiddleandinnersuburbsofthecapitals,wherenosuitableeasementsareavailable.Ithasalsobeenusedinsomelocationswhicharehighlyenvironmentallysensitive.Intotal,thepreferredalignmentincludes144kilometresoftunnelalongtheroute,representingaround29percentofthetotalcostofconstruction.Sixtypercentofthetunnellengthisinurbanareas,with67kilometresinSydney,eightkilometresinMelbourne,five kilometresinBrisbaneandfourkilometresinCanberra.
ThecostestimatesreflecttheuseofprovenHSRsystemtechnology(suchastraincontrolandpowersupplysystems)andtrainsetsalreadyinservice,andreadilyavailable,andtakeaccountofarangeofmanufacturers’deliveredcostsforexistingHSRsystems.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 17
Thecapitalcostshavebeenrisk-adjustedtoreflectuncertainty,principallyaroundthe scopeofthemajor construction,engineeringandoperationalelementsofafutureHSRprogram.Expectedconstructioncostsareexpressedthroughoutthischapterintermsofrisk-adjustedvalue,in$2012.
Intotal,theriskadjustmentprocessincreasedcapitalcostsbyabout10.8percent11.
TheestimatedcapitalcostforthefullHSRsystem,excludingthecostoftrainsets12,is$114.0 billionin$2012,asshowninTable ES-6.
TableES-6 Risk-adjustedHSRprogramcosts($2012,$billion)
Project development
Construction
Total capital costs
Canberra Sydney- Junction-Canberra Melbourne
Newcastle-Sydney
Brisbane- Gold Coast
Gold Coast Junction-Newcastle
Total HSR system
2.2 2.5 1.7 1.0 3.1 10.4
20.8 24.4 17.2 10.0 31.2 103.6
23.0 26.9 18.9 11.0 34.3 114.0
Notes:Totaldoesnotaddupexactlyduetorounding.Thereferencesto‘CanberraJunction’and‘GoldCoastJunction’describethepointsatwhichtheGoldCoastandCanberraspursleavethemainalignment.
Figure ES-8presentstheresultsofthe@RISKanalysisfortotalconstructioncostsincludingdevelopmentcostsforthefutureHSRprogram13.
Theanalysisillustratesthat:• In50percent(P50)ofsimulations,total
constructioncostsareexpectedtobelessthan$113.9billion($2012).
• In90percent(P90)ofsimulations,totalconstructioncostsareexpectedtobelessthan$127.0billion($2012).
• Intenpercent(P10)ofsimulations,totalconstructioncostsareexpectedtobelessthan$102.0billion($2012).
11 Thisistheexpectedrisk-adjustedcostandiswithinonepercentofthemedianrisk-adjustedcost,commonlyknownastheP50;thedifferencebetweenthemisduetotheriskadjustmentappliedtotheindividualcostcomponentsbeingnon-symmetrical.Takingintoaccounttheallowancesincludedindevelopingthenon-risk-adjustedcosts,theriskallowanceiscomparablewithwhatwouldbeallowedasaphysicalcontingencyforaprojectatasimilarearlystageofdevelopment.
12 Trainsetsareassumedtobeleasedinthefinancialassessment.13 Thefrequencyrepresentsthelikelihoodofthetotalconstructioncostsbeingwithina$1billionbandcentredonthecorresponding
pointonthecurve.Thusthereisatwopercentchancethatthecostwillliebetween$100.5billionand$101.5billionandafourpercentchancetheyliebetween$107billionand$108billion.
Executive Summary
FigureES-8 Totalconstructioncosts(includingdevelopmentcosts)($2012,$billion)
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
–
90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
P10102.0
P50113.9
P90127.0
Freq
uenc
y
($2012, $billion)
Figure ES-8
Figure ES-9presentsestimatedaverageconstructioncostsperroutekilometreonasegmentbysegmentbasis.TheextensivetunnellingrequiredforaccessintoandoutofSydneyincreasesthecostperroutekilometreforthesesegmentsbytwotothreetimescomparedtothecostsfortheremainderofthenetwork.
PartsoftheroutebetweenBrisbaneandNewcastlealsohavehighcosts,reflectingthevolumeofearthworksrequiredintheseareas.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 19
FigureES-9 HSRprogramaverageconstructioncostsperroute-kilometreinstagingorder($2012,$million)
160
180
185
120
140
8080
100
40
20
60
–
Bris
bane
to G
old
Coa
st
Gol
d C
oast
Jun
ctio
n to
Cas
ino
Cas
ino
to G
rafto
n
Gra
fton
to C
offs
Har
bour
Cof
fs H
arbo
ur to
Por
t Mac
quar
ie
Port
Mac
quar
ie to
Tar
ee
Tare
e to
New
cast
le
New
cast
le to
Cen
tral
Coa
st
Cen
tral
Coa
st to
Syd
ney
Sydn
ey to
Sou
ther
n H
ighl
ands
Sout
hern
Hig
hlan
ds to
Can
berr
a
Can
berr
a Ju
nctio
n to
Wag
ga W
agga
Wag
ga W
agga
to A
lbur
y-W
odon
ga
Alb
ury-
Wod
onga
to S
hepp
arto
n
Shep
part
on to
Mel
bour
ne
($20
12 $
mill
ion
per
km
)
87
54 55 5038
57 5743
137
41 4032
25
56
185
Figure ES-9Staging the development of HSRThesizeandcomplexityofanHSRsystemontheeastcoastofAustraliawouldbesuchthatitcouldnotbedeliveredasasingleproject;instead,itwouldbedeliveredinstageslinkingtheprincipalcentres.EventhesestageswouldbelargeprojectsbyAustralianstandards.Stagingwouldnotonlyallowtheupfrontfundingtobereducedandsmoothfuturefundingrequirements,butwouldalsobettermatchsystemdevelopmenttomarketgrowthandwouldallowrevenuetobegeneratedonsectionsofthesystemastheyarecompleted.
ThestudyhasconcludedthatthebenefitsofHSRarestronglyrelatedtothevolumeoftravelbetweenthecapitalcities,inparticularSydney-
Melbourne,andthatestablishingthislinkwouldbethefirstpriorityforanyHSRnetworkontheeastcoastofAustralia.Ataconstructioncostofabout$50billionin$2012(risk-adjusted),theSydney-Melbournelinewouldrepresentamajorundertakingandwoulditselfneedtobestaged.Canberra,whichwouldbeconnectedbyaspurlinetotheSydney-Melbourneline,isthenextmostimportantcityonthislinefromademandviewpointandwouldbeanappropriateterminalforthefirststagetoensurerevenuewouldbegeneratedasearlyaspossible.
Executive Summary
FigureES-10 StagingofthepreferredHSRsystem–commencementofoperations
Not to scale
Newcastle
Gold CoastQLD
NSW
VIC
ACT
SYDNEY
BRISBANE
MELBOURNE
CANBERRA
LINE 2
2051Gold Coast to Brisbane
$11.0 BN
LINE 2
2058Newcastle to Gold Coast
$34.3 BN
LINE 2
2045Sydney to Newcastle
$18.9 BN
LINE 1
2040Canberra to Melbourne
$26.9 BN LINE 1
2035Sydney to Canberra
$23.0 BN
KEYHSR preferred alignmentState border Roads
Station locations
Figure ES-10
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 21
ThestagingofthepreferredHSRsystemassumedinthefinancialandeconomicevaluations,asshowninFigure ES-10andTable ES-7,takesintoaccounttheextenttowhichindividualsectionscapturetheforecastmarket,thecostofconstructionandtheeconomicandfinancialreturnsofeachstage.
TableES-7 StagingofthepreferredHSRsystem
Line 1 Sydney-Melbourne
Built track (km)*
Risk-adjusted cost ($b)
Cost per km ($m)
Potential operational date
894 49.9 56 2040
-Stage1:Sydney-Canberra 283 23.0 81 2035
-Stage2:Canberra-Melbourne** 611 26.9 44 2040
Line 2 Brisbane-Sydney 854 64.1 75 2058
-Stage3:Newcastle-Sydney 134 18.9 141 2045
-Stage4:Brisbane-GoldCoast 115 11.0 96 2051
-Stage5:GoldCoast-Newcastle** 606 34.3 56 2058
Total 1,748 114.0 65 2058
*Notethatthebuilttrackincludesspurjunctionsandotherconnections.ThesedistancesaredifferentfromthetravelkilometresinTable ES-1andTable ES-2.**ConstructionofStages2and5wouldstartattheCanberraJunctionandGoldCoastJunctionrespectively,thepointsatwhichtheGoldCoastandCanberraspursleavethemainalignment.Note:Totalsdonotaddupexactlyduetorounding.
Executive Summary
FigureES-11 StagingofthepreferredHSRsystem–cumulativecapitalcosts($2012,$billion)
–
20
40
60
80
100
120
($20
12, $
billi
on)
205520502045204020352030202520202015 2060
Total capital costs
Sydney to Canberra operational
Brisbane to Gold Coast & Newcastle to Melbourne operational
Sydney to Melbourne operational
Network operationalNewcastle to Melbourne operational
A
DB
EC
A B C D E
Figure ES-11
Figure ES-11showstheprofileofcumulativecapitalcostsovertheHSRprogram.
Line1betweenSydneyandMelbournewouldbeamajorundertakingintermsofplanning,construction,testingandcommissioningand,basedoncurrentindustryexperience,wouldneedtobedoneindiscretestages.Forevaluationpurposes,astartdateof2035wasassumed.Workingbackfromthatdate,enablinglegislationwouldneedtobepassedby2019.Priorto2019,thefinalpreferredrouteandstationlocationswouldbedetermined,furthertechnicalinvestigationscompletedandallnecessarygovernmentapprovalsobtained.StepswouldalsobetakentopreservethepreferredHSRcorridorpriortoanycommitmenttoproceed.
Followingenablinglegislation,aperiodofmorethantwoyearswouldberequiredforconceptdesign,environmentalimpactassessmentandpublicconsultation,beforeadecisiontoproceedtoimplementationwouldbemadein2021.Therewouldthenbeaprocurementperiodoftwotothreeyearstoletcontractsandtoacquireland.Enablingworkswouldthenbeundertaken(criticallyatSydney’sCentralstation).Theseworksareanticipatedtotakefouryearstodivertthecurrentserviceswithintheexistingoperationalstationbeforethemainimplementationcontractscouldcommencein2027(i.e.financialyear2028).
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 23
Theimplementationprogramofafurther84monthsreflectstheactualprogramtodelivertheTaiwanHSRandincludesaperiodof34monthsfortestingandcommissioning.Basedonthisevaluationprogram,thefirstpublicHSRserviceswouldstartinApril2035.Subsequentstageswouldbedeliveredatfivetosevenyearintervals,withplanningofeachstageoverlappingwithconstructionofthepreviousstage.Undertheseassumptions,theentirenetworkcouldbeinoperationby2058.
ThestagingassumedinTable ES-7could,however,beacceleratedbyaboutfiveyears,althoughitwouldlikelyincuradditionalcostandrisk.Thetimetakentopasstherelevantlegislationandtomakeaformaldecisiontoproceedcouldbeaccelerated.Theenablingworkscouldalsobestartedearlier,soasnottodelaythecommencementofimplementationworksatSydneyCentralstation;thiswouldrequirefundinginadvanceoftheformaldecisiontoproceed,butcouldsave18months.Thereisalsopotentialfortheconstructionperiodtobeshortenedbyasmuchas24months,butthiswouldrequireextendedworkinghoursandcouldbelimitedbyalackofqualifiedresources.AnacceleratedprogramcouldthereforestartwiththeSydneyenablingworksin2019,withSydney-Canberraoperationalby2030andSydney-Melbourneoperationalby2035.Underthisacceleratedprogram,thefullnetworkcouldbeoperationalby2053.
Financial assessment ThefutureHSRprogramandthemajorityofitsindividualstagesareexpectedtoproduceonlyasmallpositivefinancialreturnoninvestment.
Theestimatedrealfinancialinternalrateofreturn(FIRR)fortheprogramasawholeis0.8percent.ForSydneytoMelbourne,theestimated(post-tax)realFIRRis1.0percent.Thesefallwellshortofthefinancialreturnsthatwouldberequiredbycommercialprovidersofdebtandequitytomajorinfrastructureproviders14.Atafourpercentdiscountrate,thefinancialnetpresentvalue(FNPV)offinancialcostsandrevenuesassociatedwithaninvestmentinHSRwouldbenegative$47billion15.GovernmentswouldberequiredtomeetthemajorityofconstructionandestablishmentcostsfortheHSRnetwork.
Postconstruction,thefutureHSRprogramanditsstages(withtheexceptionofSydney-Canberraasastand-alonestage16)areexpectedtogeneratesufficientoperatingincometocoverongoingoperationalandassetrenewalcosts.Thisforecastholdstrueforallbutoneofthescenariosandsensitivitiestested.Asaconsequence,HSRoperationswouldbefinanciallyself-sustainingiftrafficandcostassumptionsweremet.
Table ES-8summarisestheresultsoftheFNPVandFIRRanalysisonapreandpost-taxbasisforthefutureHSRprogramanditsstages.Thesearepresentedonacumulativepresentvaluebasis,withthesummarycostsandrevenueobtainedbydiscountingcashflowsbytheevaluationdiscountrateoffourpercenttofinancialyear2028.Sydney-Canberradeliversanegativefinancialreturn.Neithertheprogramasawhole,noranyofthestages,returnsapositiveFNPVatafourpercentdiscountrate.
14 Thesewouldtypicallybearound15percentormore.15 Discountedto2028andin$2012.16 Thatis,ifSydney-CanberrawasoperatedindependentlyofanyotherHSRline.
Executive Summary
AssumptionsaboutthetimingofthevariousstagesarealsoshowninTable ES-8.
Table ES-9setsoutthesummaryofrisk-adjustedcapitalcosts,revenues,operatingcostsandassetrenewalsovertheevaluationperiodto2085.TheHSRprogramasawholedeliversapositivenetoperatingsurplus.Thatis,forthepreferredHSRsystem,revenueswouldcoverongoing
operatingcostsandthecostsofrenewingassetswhentheywearout.Therefore,providedtrafficforecastsandcostsestimatesaremet,noongoinggovernmentsubsidywouldberequiredtosustainHSRoperationsoncethesystemisconstructedandoperational.Astrafficbuildsup,theabilityoftransportoperationstoreturnsomeofthecapitalcostswouldincrease.
TableES-8 SummaryofFNPVandFIRRresults(presentvaluediscountedto2028,$2012,$billion,4%discountrate)
Future HSR program
Sydney- Sydney- Newcastle- Brisbane- Network 17Canberra Melbourne Melbourne Gold Coast & complete
Newcastle- Melbourne
Year operations 2035 2040 2045 2051 2058commence
Totalcosts 20.9 41.1 52.8 58.3 72.0
Netoperatingresult* -0.4 10.5 11.6 11.3 15.5
FIRR (real) n/a 1.0% 0.9% 0.4% 0.8%
FIRR (real, pre-tax) n/a 1.4% 0.9% 0.4% 0.8%
FNPV -21.5 -26.5 -35.2 -41.3 -47.0
FNPV (pre-tax) -21.5 -25.0 -35.2 -41.3 -47.0
Notes:*Revenueslessoperatingcostsincludingpaymentsforrollingstockleasesandassetrenewal.Duetoaccumulatedtaxlosses(primarilyfromdepreciationontheinfrastructureassetbase),onlytheSydney-MelbourneHSRstagepayscorporationtaxduringtheevaluationperiod.Wheretaxisnotpayable,theFIRRandFNPVdonotdifferonapreandpost-taxbasis.‘n/a’denotesanFIRRoflessthanzeropercentthatcannotbemathematicallycalculated.
17 NetworkcompleterepresentstheentireHSRnetworkbetweenBrisbaneandMelbourne.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 25
TableES-9 Summaryrisk-adjustedcapitalcosts,revenues,operatingcostsandassetrenewalsoverthetotalevaluationperiodto2085(presentvaluediscountedto2028,$2012,$billion,4%discountrate)
Sydney- Sydney- Newcastle- Brisbane- Network Canberra Melbourne Melbourne Gold complete
Coast & Newcastle-Melbourne
Year operations 2035 2040 2045 2051 2058commence
Totaldevelopmentcosts 2.3 4.7 6.1 6.8 8.8
Totalconstructioncosts 18.6 36.4 46.7 51.5 63.2
Total capital costs 20.9 41.1 52.8 58.3 72.0
Totalrevenue 5.0 39.4 43.0 43.5 62.7
Totaloperatingcosts 4.4 25.1 27.3 27.9 42.2
Totalpaymentsforrolling 0.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.8stockfinanceleases
Totalassetrenewals 1.0 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.2
Total operating result -0.4 10.5 11.6 11.3 15.5
Terminal value -0.2 4.0 5.6 5.4 9.1
FNPV -21.5 -26.5 -35.2 -41.3 -47.0
Note:Totalmaynotbeexactduetotimingandroundingdifferences.
Risk-adjustedprojectcashflowsforeachyearoftheevaluationperiod,reflectingtheproposedstagingoftheHSRprogram,areshowninFigure ES-12.Totalannualprojectcapitalexpenditurerangesfrom$2 billionto$8billionineachoftheeightyearspriortotheopeningoftheSydney-Canberrasectionin2035,andthencontinuesatbetween$2billionand$7billionperyearforthenext23 yearsuntilthefullnetworkisoperationalin 2058.
Executive Summary
FigureES-12 HSRprogramrisk-adjustedprojectcashflowsperyear($2012,$billion)
Revenue received Operating costs paid GST (paid)/received
Payments for rolling stock finance leases
Sydney to Canberra operational
Brisbane to Gold Coast & Newcastle to Melbourne operational
Sydney to Melbourne operational
Network operationalNewcastle to Melbourne operational
Tax paid Capital expenditure
15
10
5
–
-5
-10
-15
205520502045204020352030202520202015 2060 2065 2070 2075 2080
($20
12, $
billi
on)
A
DB
EC
A B C D E
Figure ES-13
WiththeexceptionofthecostsassociatedwithaccessingSydney(asshowninFigure ES-9),capitalcostsincreasebroadlyinproportiontothelengthoftheHSRlinebeingconstructed.AsindicatedinFigure ES-12,extensionstothenetworkleadtostepchangesinpatronageandthereforearecriticaltotheoperatingcashflows.Forinstance,completingSydney-CanberraorCanberra-Melbourneasstand-alonesegmentswouldproduceonlymoderatepassengerdemandandfinancialreturns.WhenthewholelineconnectingSydney-Melbourneiscompleted,significantadditionaldemandwouldbegenerated
(passengernumbersatthatpointincreasebyafactoroffive).Operatingcashflowsandreturnsthenalsoimprove,reflectingthegrowthinpatronagewithoutacorrespondinglymaterialincreaseincapitalcosts.ThesamebenefitwouldbeobservedwhentheGoldCoastisconnectedtoNewcastleandthefullHSRsystemisinoperation,resultinginaconsiderableupliftindemandbetweenBrisbane,SydneyandMelbourne.Thefinancialperformance(annualcashflow)ofeachstageissummarisedinFigure ES-13.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 27
FigureES-13 HSRprogramrisk-adjustedcashflowsperyearbystage($2012,$billion)
($20
12 $
billi
on)
Full network Sydney to CanberraSydney to MelbourneNewcastle to Melbourne
Brisbane to Gold Coast and Newcastle to Melbourne
Sydney to Canberra operational
Brisbane to Gold Coast & Newcastle to Melbourne operational
Sydney to Melbourne operational
Network operationalNewcastle to Melbourne operational
A
DB
EC
205520502045204020352030202520202015 2060 2065 2070 2075 2080
4
2
–
-2
-4
-6
-8
A B C D E
Figure 2 DuetothefutureHSRprogram’sexpectedlowfinancialreturns,significantprivatesectorfunding(debt/equity)wouldnotbeavailableorappropriatetofinancetheprogram.Assuch,aconsiderablecommercialfinancinggapwouldexistbetweenthetotalcapitalcostoftheHSRprogramandtheamountoffinancingthatcouldberaisedfromthefinancialmarketsoncommercialterms,basedonthefutureHSRprogramoperatingcashflows.
Basedonthedetailedanalysisofprogramcashflows,thecommercialfinancinggapfortheentireHSRprogramwouldbeabout$98billion(or86percentofthetotalrisk-adjustedcapitalcost)asshowninTable ES-10.FortheSydney-Melbourneline,thecommercialfinancinggapwouldbeabout$45billion,or92 percentofthetotalcapitalcost.
Executive Summary
TableES-10 Summaryofthecommercialfinancinggap–referencecase($2012,$billion)
Total capital cost
Debt carrying capacity
Commercial coverage
Commercial financing gap
HSR program
114.0
16.3
14%
97.7
Sydney-Melbourne
49.9
4.1
8%45.7
ValuecapturehasthepotentialtopartiallyclosethecommercialfinancinggapthroughmeasuressuchasgovernmentlandsalesandcapturingtheincrementalimpactthattheHSRprogramwouldhaveonstampduty,developmentsandratesintheHSRaffectedzones.However,thiswouldbeasmallcontributionatbest.Itishighlyunlikelythatallofthesemeasureswouldbeimplementedandtheultimatebenefitthatvaluecapturemight
haveonclosingthecommercialfinancinggapisthereforedifficulttodetermineatthisstage.
UltimatelygovernmentswouldberequiredtofundthemajorityofthefutureHSRprogram’supfrontcapitalcosts.AsummaryofthecashflowimplicationsforgovernmentforthewholenetworkispresentedinFigure ES-14.
FigureES-14 HSRprogramgovernmentcashflows($2012,$billion)
Figure ES-14
($20
12, $
billi
on)
205520502045204020352030202520202015 2060 2065 2070 2075 2080
—
-4
-6
-8
-2
2
4
A B C D E
Sydney to Canberra operational
Brisbane to Gold Coast & Newcastle to Melbourne operational
Sydney to Melbourne operational
Network operationalNewcastle to Melbourne operational
A
DB
EC
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 29
Economic assessmentThestudyadoptedacost-benefitmethodologythatisconventionallyappliedtomajortransportinfrastructureprojects.Thecostcomponentsoftheanalysis,includingthenecessarycapitalexpenditurerequiredtodevelop,constructandrenewtheHSRsystemascomponentswearout,dependontheproposedHSRengineeringandtechnicalspecificationsadoptedforthepreferredHSRsystemandontheassumedstagingofnetworkdevelopmentsetoutinTable ES-7.Forthepurposesofevaluation,constructionofstage1ofLine1(i.e.theSydney-CanberrastageoftheSydney-Melbourneline)isassumedtostartinJuly2027(startoffinancialyear2028).
Onceconstructed,theHSRsystemwouldgenerateastreamofeconomicbenefits,linkedtotheassessmentoffuturetraveldemand.Ingeneralterms,thetotaleconomicbenefitoftravelonHSRwoulddependonhowmucheachpassengervaluestheirtrip,oftentermedtheir‘willingnesstopay’.Thisiscalculatedbymeasuringthedifferencesingeneralisedtripcostswhencomparingthereferencecase(withHSR)tothebasecase(withoutHSR).AggregatingwillingnesstopayacrossallusersofHSRandovertimeprovidesanassessmentofthetotal(gross)economicvaluecreatedforusersofthesystembytheinvestmentinafutureHSRprogram.
Transportingpassengersconsumeseconomicresourcessuchaslabourandfuel.BecauseHSRcouldreducedemandforothermodesoftransport,andhencetheirconsumptionofresources,theadditionalresourcesrequiredforHSRneedtobeoffsetagainsttheresourcesavoidedinothermodes.ThenetchangeinresourcesisdeductedfromthegrosseconomicvaluetocalculatethestreamofeconomicbenefitsderivedfromtheinvestmentinHSR.
Thedistributionofthenetbenefitsbetweentheusersandtheoperator(s)oftheHSRsystemisdeterminedbythepricescharged.Ultimately,priceswouldservetotransfereconomicvaluefromusersofthesystemtoitsoperators.Revenueisthereforeincludedinthecalculations(asacosttousersandabenefittooperators)toassesstherelativebenefitstousersandoperators.Theneteconomicbenefitsinternaltothetransportsystemarethereforemeasuredbyaddingthetwocomponents:• Userbenefits(orconsumersurplus)are
calculatedbasedonthedifferencebetweenauser’swillingnesstopayforaserviceandtheactualpricepaid.
• Operatorbenefits(orproducersurplus)representthedifferencebetweenthepricepaidorrevenuegeneratedbyaserviceandthecostsassociatedwith(orresourcesconsumedby)operatingtheservice.Thechangeinoperatorbenefitsisassessedforeachmode(i.e.HSR,aviation,conventionalrailandcoach).
Inaddition,therewouldbecostsandbenefitsthatareexternaltothetransportsystemthatcanbemeasuredinmonetarytermsandincludedinthecost-benefitanalysis.TheseexternalitiesmeasuretheimpactofHSRtothebroadercommunity,includingenvironmentalandsafetyimpacts,decongestionbenefitsandanyalternativeavoidedordeferredtransportnetworkcapitalexpenditure.Aresidualvaluehasalsobeenincludedtocapturetheremainingvalueoftheassetsattheendoftheevaluationperiod18.Thepresentvaluesofcostsandbenefitsbycategory,discountedatfourpercent,areshowninFigure ES-1519.Theeconomicnetpresentvalue(ENPV)isthesumofthepresentvalueoftheeconomiccostsandbenefits,whichfortheprogramasawholeis$101billion.
18 A50yearevaluationperiodhasbeenadopted,commencingin2035.19 Thediscountrateconvertscashflowsoffuturecostsandbenefitsintopresentdaydollarstoallowacomparisonofcostsandbenefits,
expressedin$2012,andusingacommonbaseyear,inthiscasefinancialyear2028,whichistheassumedstartofconstructionofthefirststage.
Executive Summary
FigureES-15 PresentvalueofcostsandbenefitsfortheHSRprogram(presentvaluediscountedto2028,$2012,$billion,4%discountrate)
Costs Benefits ENPV
100
120
80
60
40
20
0
-40
-20
-60
-80
-100
Capitalexpenditure
Userbenefits
Operatorbenefits
Externalities Residual value
ENPV
($bn)
14 1
79
141
25 101
TheHSRuserbenefitsdominatetheeconomicresultsandaccountfor90percentoftheestimatedbenefits(excludingtheresidualvalue).Akeycomponentistheassessmentoftimesavingsfortravellersacrosstheirfulljourneyincludingtraveltime,waitingtime,check-intimeandaccesstime,withadjustmentsfortheinconvenienceofhavingtochangemodes.Traveltimesavingsaremeasuredusingvaluesoftimebasedonmarketresearchconductedforthisstudyandtestedforreasonablenessagainstconventionalvaluesusedinroadprojects,whichvarybytrippurpose(e.g.businessversusleisure)20.
Businesstravellerswouldgainthemajorityofuserbenefitsduetotheirhighervalueoftime,eventhoughtheyonlyrepresentabout35percentofthetotalHSRtravelmarket,asshowninTable ES-11.
20Austroads,Guide to Project Evaluation,2012.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 31
TableES-11 Userbenefitestimatesbymarketsegment(presentvaluediscountedto2028,$2012,$billion)
Short regional
Long regional
Inter-city
Total
Business users Leisure users Total
9.1
58.4
73.2
140.7
1.7 7.4
31.3 27.1
60.6 12.6
93.6 47.1
ThesummaryresultsforthereferencecasepredictthataninvestmentinthepreferredHSRprogramwouldgenerateaneconomicinternalrateofreturn(EIRR)of7.6percentandaneconomiccost-benefitratio(EBCR)of2.3usingafourpercent
discountrate21.AsevenpercentdiscountratehasalsobeentestedandwouldreducetheENPVto$5billionandtheEBCRto1.1,asshowninTable ES-12;althoughmarginal,theestimatedeconomicbenefitsremainpositive.
TableES-12 SummaryeconomicindicatorsfortheHSRprogram(presentvaluediscountedto2028,$2012,$billion)
4% discount rate 7% discount rate
Totalcosts 79.3 58.9
Totalbenefits 180.6 63.8
EIRR 7.6% 7.6%
ENPV 101.3 4.9
1.1EBCR 2.3
Sydney-Melbourneisthestrongestperformingline,withanestimatedEIRRof7.8percent,asshowninTable ES-13.IthasanestimatedpositiveENPVof$69billionandanEBCRof2.5whenmeasuredonastand-alonebasis.
TableES-13 SummaryeconomicindicatorsforSydney-Melbourne(presentvaluediscountedto2028,$2012,$billion)
4% discount rate 7% discount rate
Totalcosts 46.5 38.9
Totalbenefits 115.7 45.3
EIRR 7.8% 7.8%
ENPV 69.3 6.5
EBCR 2.5 1.2
Note:Totalsdonotaddupexactlyduetorounding.
21 TheEIRRrepresentsthediscountratethatmakesthenetpresentvalueofalleconomiccashflowsequaltozero.ThehighertheEIRRthegreatertheneteconomicreturnsachievedbyaprojectrelativetoitscapitalresourcecostsandifEIRRisgreaterthanthediscountrate,thentheprojectwoulddeliverapositiveneteconomicbenefit.
Executive Summary
TheincrementaleconomicresultsforeachadditionalstageofthepreferredHSRprogramaresetoutinTable ES-14.TheresultssupportthepreferredstagingoftheHSRprogram,withSydney-MelbournedeliveringanestimatedEIRRof7.8percent.Thesubsequentnorthernstages
fromNewcastle-MelbourneandBrisbane-GoldCoastaddlittleincrementaleconomicvalueonastand-alonebasis(i.e.ENPVdoesnotmateriallychange)andtheresultssuggesttheywouldnotbeundertakenunlesstheintentionweretocompletethelineconnectingBrisbaneandSydney.
TableES-14 IncrementaleconomicimpactsforeachadditionalstageoftheHSRprogram(presentvaluediscountedto2028,$2012,$billion)
Year operations commence
Future HSR program
Sydney-Canberra
Sydney- Melbourne
Newcastle- Melbourne
Brisbane-Gold
Coast & Newcastle-Melbourne
Network complete
(i.e. Brisbane-Melbourne)
2035 2040 2045 2051 2058
Totalcosts* 22.2 46.5 58.6 64.3 79.3
Totalbenefits 20.4 115.7 126.7 126.7 180.6
EIRR 3.8% 7.8% 7.3% 7.1% 7.6%
ENPV -1.7 69.3 68.1 63.9 101.3
EBCR 0.9 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.3
*Costsincluderollingstockandassetrenewalcosts.
Overall,theresultsoftheanalysispresentapositiveeconomiccasefortheintroductionofHSR.Forecastswerepreparedforthereferencecase(i.e.withHSR)whichwaspartofthecentralcaseforevaluationpurposes.Thereferencecasereflectsarangeoflong-termassumptionsandexpectations,including:• Stronggrowthinthebasetravelmarketover
the52yearsto2065(travelontheeastcoastwillmorethandoublefrom153milliontripsto355milliontrips).
• NosignificantincreaseinaviationcapacityintheSydneybasin.Thisresultsinincreaseddelaysandtheinabilityofpassengerstotravelatpreferredtimes,consistentwithassumptionsintheJointStudyonAviationCapacityfortheSydneyRegion22.AssumedadditionalaviationcapacityinSydneyhastheeffectofreducingtheestimatedEIRRfortheHSRprogramasawholefrom7.6percentto7.1percentandreducingtheECBRfrom2.3to2.1.Additionalaviationcapacityalsoreducesthefinancialreturnfrom0.8percentto0.3percent.
22 AustralianGovernmentandNSWGovernment,Joint Study on Aviation Capacity for the Sydney Region,Canberra,2012.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 33
• HSRfareswouldbestructuredtobecomparabletoandcompetitivewithalternativemodesoftransportforbothbusinessandleisurepurposes.HSRfareshavebeensettobecompetitivewithairfaresonthemaininter-capitalroutesontheeastcoast,trendingdownwardsovertimeby0.5percentperyearto2015andremainingconstantthereafter,consistentwiththeforecastreductioninrealairfares.Caroperatingcostsincreaseovertimeduetoaforecastrealincreaseinthecostoffuel(13percentrealincreaseby2065afterallowingforforecastimprovementsinfuelefficiency).
– IfHSRfareswereincreasedby30percent,theEIRRfortheprogramasawholewouldreduceto7.4percent.However,thefinancialreturnwouldimprovefrom0.8percentto2.3 percent,withoperatingcashflowsbecomingpositivethreeyearsearlierin2038.
– IfHSRfareswereincreasedby50percent,economicreturnswouldfallfurtherbutHSRwouldstillproducesubstantialneteconomicgains,withanEIRRof7.2percentandanEBCRof2.1(atafourpercentdiscountrate).Thefinancialreturnwouldimprovefurthertothreepercent.
Competitive aviation responseThestudypredictsthatoverhalfthe83.6millionHSRtripsforecastin2065wouldbedivertedfromair,whichwouldhaveasignificantimpactonaviationmarkets.
Airlineservicesaremobileinthesensethattherearefewsignificantsunkcapitalcostsinservicingparticularroutesandassetscanbequicklyredeployedtootherroutes.Airlinesoperatingalongkeyregionalandinter-capitalroutesacrosstheeastcoastofAustraliaalreadycompetestronglyagainsteachother,andfarelevelsofmanyfareclasseshavedeclinedovertime,whichsuggeststhatairfarelevelsarealreadyhighlycompetitiveonmajorroutes.
ItisnotexpectedthatairlineswouldrespondtoHSRcompetitionbyreducingtheirfaresonasustainedbasis.Rather,ithasbeenassumedthatairlineswouldquicklyreducecapacity,eitherbyreducingfrequenciesoraircraftsizes,tolocationswithintheHSRcorridorwherethereissignificantpassengerdiversiontoHSR.Thisassumptionisconsistentwithoverseasexperiencewhere,followingtheintroductionofHSR,theairlineresponsehasgenerallybeentoreduceservicesonthecompetitiveroute.
AirlinesdonotcontrolallofthecomponentsofanendtoendjourneybyairthatinfluencetherelativecompetitivenessofairtravelandHSRtravel.Mostimportantofthesearethecostofaccessingtheairport,itslocationrelativetoHSRstationsandairportcapacity.Nevertheless,totheextentthatairlinesareabletoinnovateinwaysthathavenotbeenanticipatedinthisstudy,itcouldhaveanimpactonactualHSRpatronage.
Executive Summary
Alowdemand/highcostsensitivitywasdevelopedthatincludedarangeofalternativeassumptionswhichincombinationresultinasetofcircumstancesunfavourabletoHSR.Thelowdemand/highcostscenarioincludes:• NoaviationcapacityconstraintsinSydney.• A30percentincreaseinpre-riskcapitalcosts.• Lowpopulationgrowthandlow
economicgrowth.• A50percentincreaseinHSRfares.
Whilethecombinationoftheseassumptionsmaybeunlikely,theresultsoftheanalysisprovideausefulbasisforcomparisonandanunderstandingoftheeconomicperformanceoftheHSRprogram.ThecombinationofassumptionssignificantlyreducestheeconomicreturngeneratedbythefutureHSRprogramfrom7.6percentto3.8percent.Theimpactonthefinancialreturnis,however,modestwiththehighercostsoffsetbythelargefareincrease.
Theeconomicandfinancialresultsweretestedagainstarangeofsensitivitytests,withtheresultssummarisedinFigure ES-16andFigure ES-17:• Thelowgrowthscenarioassumeslower
economicandpopulationgrowth(relativetothereferencecase)resultinginloweroveralldemandfortransportandthuslowerdemandforHSR.ItassumespercapitaGDPgrowthratesareassumedtobe0.3percentperyearlowerthanthereferencecase,andpopulationgrowthisassumedtobe51percentbetween2010and2065,comparedto72percentinthereferencecase.
• ThehighgrowthscenarioassumesthattheAustralianeconomyexperiencesstronggrowthintothefuture(highGDPgrowth),withhighpopulationgrowth.ThisscenarioresultsinhigheroveralldemandfortransportandthushigherdemandforHSR.PercapitaGDPgrowthratesareassumedtobe0.3percentperyearhigherthaninthereferencecase,andpopulationgrowthisassumedtobe103 percentbetween2010and2065,comparedto72percentinthereferencecase.
• Higher(+30percentand+50percent)HSRfares.
• Anaggressivecompetitiveaviationresponsewhichresultsina50percentreductioninfaresfortwoyears.
• AdditionalaviationcapacitywithintheSydneyregion,whichremovesthenegativeeffectsoftraveltimeonflightsto/fromSydneyfromthereferencecase,andassumesthereisnounmetdemand.
• AdditionalaviationcapacitywithintheSydneyregion,combinedwith30percentincreaseinHSRfares.
• Lowdemandandhighcosts(describedabove).• Modechoicemodelsensitivities(including
alternativespecificconstants(ASCs),access/egressweightingandvaluesoftime).
• Higher(+30percent)capitalandoperatingcosts.
• Lower(−10percent)capitalandoperatingcosts.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 35
FigureES-16 Impactofalternativeassumptionsontheeconomicresults(EIRR)
EIRR (%)
Low
cas
e
Hig
h ca
se
HSR
fare
s +3
0%
HSR
fare
s +5
0%
Com
petit
ive
avia
tion
resp
onse
Add
ition
al
avia
tion
capa
city
Com
bine
d av
iatio
n ca
paci
ty a
nd H
SR
fare
s +3
0%
Acc
ess/
egre
ss
set t
o 1.
0
HSR
ASC
s se
t to
zero
Cos
ts +
30%
Low
dem
and
/ hi
gh c
osts
Cos
ts -1
0%
Fixe
d va
lue
of ti
me
8
9
10
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Reference case=7.6%
5.9%
7.4% 7.2%6.9%
7.3% 7.4%
3.8%
6.0%6.1%
8.2%
9.4%
7.1%7.6%
FigureES-17 Impactofalternativeassumptionsonthefinancialresults(realFIRRposttax)
FIRR (%)
Low
cas
e
Hig
h ca
se
HSR
fare
s +3
0%
HSR
fare
s +5
0%
Com
petit
ive
avia
tion
resp
onse
Add
ition
al a
viat
ion
capa
city
Com
bine
d av
iatio
n ca
paci
ty a
nd H
SR
fare
s +3
0%
HSR
ASC
s se
t to
zero
Fixe
d va
lue
of ti
me
Acc
ess/
egre
ss
set t
o 1.
0
Low
dem
and
/ hi
gh c
osts
Cos
ts -1
0%
Cos
ts +
30%
43210-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9
Reference case=0.8%
-0.8%
-9.8%
1.8%2.0%
3.0%2.3%
1.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5%0.8%
-10
Executive Summary
Environmental and social assessmentAstrategicenvironmentalassessmentframework,consistentwithAustralianGovernmentguidelines,wasdevelopedanditskeyprinciplesincorporatedintotheselectionofthepreferredalignmentandstationlocationstoreducethepotentialfornegativeenvironmentalimpactsshouldtherebeadecisiontoproceedwithHSR.
ApreliminarystrategicassessmentoftheenvironmentalandsocialaspectsofaHSRsystemontheeastcoastwasundertakenforthreereasons:• Toensurethatenvironmentalfactorswere
integratedintothedevelopmentoftheHSRsystem,includingdecisionsaboutthecorridorselection,alignment,stationlocationsanddesignfeatures.
• ToensurethattheoverallHSRsystemisconsistentwithprinciplesofecologicallysustainabledevelopment.
• Toidentifyimportantenvironmentalandsocialissuestobefurtherinvestigatedandassessedintheimplementationphases,shouldadecisionbemadetoproceedwithHSR.
TheassessmentoftheenvironmentalimpactsofHSRwasintegratedintotheevaluationofalignmentoptionsandstationoptions,usingaGeographicInformationSystem(GIS)toolkittoidentifypotentialecologicalandheritageinteractionsandlanduseplanningconstraintsandopportunitiesassociatedwiththevariousoptions.Theseevaluationswerecombinedwithotherconsiderations,suchasengineeringparameters,constructability,costanduserbenefitstodeterminethepreferredalignmentandstationlocations.
ThepreferredHSRalignmentandstationswereselectedtoavoid,whereverpossible,significantimpactsoncommunitiesandecologicalandheritageresources.ResidualimpactswouldbemanagedbymitigationstrategiesdevelopedduringtheconceptanddetaileddesignphasesofHSRdevelopment,shouldadecisionbemadetoproceedwithHSR.Thisisastandardpracticeforlargeinfrastructureprojects.Wherenecessary,offsetsfornaturalenvironmentscouldalsobeused.
Inaddition,theassessmentofenvironmentalissuesassociatedwithHSRhasaddressednoiseandvibration,energyuseandcarbonemissions/greenhousegasconsiderations,theimplicationsofclimatechange,andthepromotionofecologicallysustainabledevelopment(ESD).Additionaldetailedinvestigationswouldberequiredacrosseachofthesedisciplines,shouldgovernmentsdecidetoproceedwithHSR,tominimisetheenvironmentalimpactsandmaximisepotentialpositiveoutcomes.
Thesocialimpactshavebeencanvassedthroughtheme-basedcasestudiesintothreekeyareasidentifiedthroughresearchandstakeholderconsultation:a. Workforceandcommunitydevelopment.b. Accesstohealthandotherpublicservices.c. Tourism,recreationandsocialinclusion.
ThecasestudieshighlightthatHSRcouldpotentiallyhavearangeofbothpositiveandnegativeimpacts.
Broader impacts of HSRImpacts on regionsInternationalevidencedemonstratesthatHSRcancontributeto,butisnotalwaysacauseof,regionaldevelopment.ImplementationofHSRwouldsignificantlyimproveaccessibilitybetweencapitalcitiesandregionalcentresandwouldprovidethepotentialforsignificantregionaleconomicdevelopment.However,theextenttowhichregionaltownsandcitiesservedbyHSRtakeadvantageofthatpotentialwoulddependon:• Supportiveandalignedregionaldevelopment
policiesattheCommonwealth,stateandlocallevels.
• Theavailabilityandappropriateapplicationofinvestment.
• MetropolitanandregionalplanningpoliciesthatencourageandsupportnewdevelopmentinregionalcentreswithHSRstations.
• ThetimingofHSRopeninginrelationtobroadeconomictrends.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 37
Robustandpragmaticplanningwouldberequiredtodeterminehowtheseinitiativesshouldbedevelopedandwhatoutcomesshouldbepursued.Inpart,theyareassociatedwiththenatureandscaleoftheproposedHSRnetworkandrequireforecastingresponsesandconditionsmanyyearsintothefuture.Theyarealsouncertain,however,becausetheywouldrequireresponsesfromoutsidethetransportsector.Theywouldneedbusinessestochangehowtheyoperate,investmentstoswitchtonewlocations,andtouriststochangetheirtravelpatterns.
AninvestmentofthemagnitudeandnatureofHSRcouldalsohaveunintendedconsequencesandimpacts,suchascausingsmallregionalcitiestolosejobsandresidentstonearbyregionalcentreswithHSRstations.Thesenegativeimpactswouldneedtobemanagedthougheffectiveregionaldevelopmentpolicies,earlyandcarefulplanningtopositionlocalbusinessesforchange,andappropriatehumanandcapitalinvestmentincomplementaryassets.
TogainpositiveandsustainedbenefitsfromHSR,regionalcommunitiesalongthecorridorswouldneedtofollowdeliberatestrategies.HSRisnotapanaceaforregionaldevelopmentbut,whencoupledwithappropriatestrategiesandplans,itcouldhaveapositiveimpactonregionalcommunitiesovertime.
InexaminingthepotentialimpactsofHSR,theinherentuncertaintiesneedtobeacknowledged.However,withproactiveandpositiveresponsesfromkeystakeholders,theimplementationofHSRcouldresultinimprovementsinregionalproductivity,changestotouristspendingpatternsand,forregionsclosertothecapitalcities,changestocommutingpatterns.Emerginginternationalevidencesuggeststhatwidereconomicimpactsattheregionallevelmaybegeneratedbyregionalaccessibilityimprovements,thoughquantitativeestimatesoftheseareconsideredneithersufficientlycertainnorrobustforinclusioninthemaineconomicassessment.
Impacts on citiesHSRcouldhavewidereconomicimpactsoncitiesthroughitsimpactoneffectiveemploymentdensity,thatis,bybringingplacesofresidenceandemploymentclosertogetherbyareductionintraveltimes.Benefitscanthenariseinanumberofways:• Itiseasiertomatchworkerstospecific
vacanciesandtofindemployeeswithappropriateskills.
• Itenablesgreaterspecialisationofsupply,leadingtomoreefficientproductionofgoodsandprovisionofservices.
• Itleadstoknowledgespill-over(i.e.greateropportunitiesforformalandinformalcontactthroughincreasedaccessibility).
• Employeeshaveagreaterchoiceofjobs.• Thereismorecompetitionbetweencompanies
andbetweenindividuals.
AstheHSRsystemisconstructed,accessibilitytomajorcitiesfromareassuchastheCentralCoast(toSydney)andtheGoldCoast(toBrisbane)wouldimprove,allowingemployerstoaccessalargerlabourpoolandprovidingemployeeswithawiderchoiceofemployers.Internationally,positiveeconomicbenefitshavebeenattributedtosuchimpacts,socalledagglomerationbenefits,andincludedinthequantitativeassessmentofthebenefitsofinvestmentsintransportinfrastructure.However,asnotedabove,becauseoftheuncertaintyoftheseeffectsinthecurrentcontext,noadjustmentstotheeconomicreturnshavebeenmadefortheminthisstudy.
Impacts on the national economyAlthoughthemajorityofbenefitsofHSRwouldaccruetousersofthesystem,HSRwouldhaveapositivenetimpactonthesizeofthenationaleconomy,withGDPestimatedtobe0.1percenthigherrelativetothebaselinein2085.
HSRwouldalsoraisetheoveralllevelofinvestmentinAustralia.In2036,HSRinvestmentwouldrepresent0.8percentofaggregateinvestmentintheeconomy,andwouldaveragearound0.4percentduringtheconstructionperiodasawhole.TheassumptionthatHSRwouldbefinanceddomesticallymeansthat,toaccumulate
Executive Summary
therequiredHSRcapitalstock,someofAustralia’spoolofinvestmentwouldbechannelledintoHSRinsteadofelsewhere.Thisinvestmentsubstitutioneffectproducesanegativeimpactontheeconomy,sinceitassumesthatinvestmentwouldbedivertedawayfromsectorswithahigherfinancialreturnthanwouldbeachievableforHSR(whichisprojectedtoachieveonlya0.8percentfinancialrateofreturnoncapitalinvested),loweringAustralia’saveragereturnoninvestment.Otherthingsbeingequal,andintheabsenceofhigherproductivitybenefitsgeneratedbyHSR,thiswouldlowerconsumptionandGDP.However,businesstraveltimesavingsgeneratedbyHSRareestimatedtoincreaselabourproductivity,whichoverthelongtermdrivesgainsinGDP,offsettingthenegativeinvestmentimpacts.
TheinvestmentimpactsofHSRwouldbedifferentifitwereassumedtobefinancedbyborrowingfromforeignsources.Therewouldbelesscrowdingoutofhigherreturncapital,butcostsinvolvedwithservicingtheforeigndebtwouldbeincurred.
RealconsumptionisestimatedtodecreaseduringtheconstructionofHSR(untilaround2056).Post2056,realconsumptionbeginstoincreaserelativetothebaselineasbenefitsstarttoflowfromtheoperationofHSR.AsinvestmentinHSRtailsoffandproductivitygainsflowfromtheoperationalphase,resourcescanberedirectedtootherinvestmentusesandtoconsumption,andnationalincome(movingcloselywithGDPduetotheassumptionofdomesticfinancing)beginstoincreaseandmoveabovethebaseline.
Similarly,theinvestmentsubstitutioneffectmeansthatHSRwouldimpacteachoftheAustralianstatesindifferentways.Allelsebeingequal,anincreaseininvestmentinonestate,forexample,wouldresultinareductioninthelevelofinvestmentacrosstheremainingstates.InthecaseofHSR,theimpactoneachstatereflectsthestrengthofinvestmentinandoperationofHSR,andtheconcentrationofindustriesthatcompeteforHSRinputswithineachstate.
Basedontheseassumptions,NSW/ACTisexpectedtobetheprimarybeneficiarystatefromHSRduetothesubstantialinvestmentitreceives.
TheexpansioninNSW/ACT’sGSPwouldcomeatacosttotheotherstates,whichwouldsharetheburdenofreducedinvestmentinothersectors.ProductivitygainsarealsoexpectedtobeconcentratedinNSW/ACT,althoughtherewouldstillbesufficientgainsinVictoriaandQueenslandtoyieldapositiveGSPimpact.
TheconstructionofHSRdrawslabourintoNSW/ACTandawayfromotherstates.TheassumedconstraintonlaboursupplymeansthatthebulkoftheexpansioninconstructionsectorlabourrequirementsinNSW/ACTwouldhavetobeoffsetbycontractionsinothersectors,leadingtovaryingimpactsonemploymentbystatesimilartoimpactsonGSPbystate,butwithlessintensity.
Whilebeyondthescopeofthemodelling,alternativefundingarrangementsinvolvingadifferentsharingofthefinancingofHSRwouldclearlyalterthepatternofgainsandlossesindifferentregions.
Implementing a future HSR programRoles of the public and private sectorsTheAustralianGovernment,ACTGovernmentandrelevantstategovernmentswouldneedtohaveacentralroleinthedevelopmentofHSR.ThiswouldbeduebothtoitsstrategicnatureandtothefactthattheAustralianpublicwouldhavetofundmostoftheinfrastructure.Governmentswouldowntheinfrastructureandwouldhaveanobligationtoensurethatitwasefficientlyandeffectivelyprovidedandused.
Withaninitialcapitalcostinexcessof$100billion,afutureHSRprogramwouldbeoneofthelargestinfrastructureprogramseverundertakeninAustralia.Itssizewouldchallengetheresourcesofthesupplierindustry,bothdomesticallyandglobally,withonlyalimitednumberoforganisationshavingthefinancialcapacityanddepthofskillsandresourcesavailabletocompeteforthelikelysizeofworkspackages.Toachievevalueformoney,governmentswouldneedtocarefullypackageandstagetheprocurementtoensurecompetitivebidswereachievedfor
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 39
eachpackage.Governmentwouldneedtoretainsomeoftherisksaroundtheintegrationofthecomponentparts,buttheseriskscouldbemitigatedthroughrigoroustechnicaloversight.
GovernmentswouldretainanongoingroleinthestewardshipoftheHSRsectorafterconstruction,toensuretheobjectivesandeconomicbenefitsoftheHSRprogramwereachieved.ThisrolewouldinvolveprovidingoversightofthedeliveryofHSRservicesagainstagreedpriceandservicequalitymetrics,whilebeingcarefultoavoidconstrainingthemarketagilityandinnovationofthosemanagingthetransportservices.Governmentswouldalsoberesponsibleforsafetyandenvironmentalcompliance.
Theprivatesectorshouldbecloselyinvolvedinabroadrangeofroles:• Designandconstructionofcomponentsofthe
HSRinfrastructurenetworkundercontracttogovernments.
• Developmentofstationprecinctsinpartnershipwiththerelevantgovernment.
• Supplyofrollingstock(trainsets)andthesignallingandcommunicationssystems.
• ControlandoperationofHSRtrainstodeliverhighstandardtransportservicestothepublic.
• MaintenanceoftheHSRsystem.
DevelopmentofHSRstations,andassociatedcommercialopportunities,wouldofferanopportunityforprivatefinance.Apublic-privatepartnershipmodelisenvisagedforgreenfieldstationdevelopments,withtheprivatesectorpartneringwiththerelevantstateorterritorygovernmentforCBDstationdevelopments.
Underthepreferredmodel,HSRtrainserviceswouldbecontractedtoaprivatesectoroperatorthroughoneormoreconcessionarrangements.TherewouldbeseparateconcessionsforLine1andLine2,eachbeingacombinedexclusiveconcessionforinter-capitalexpressandregionalservicesonthatroute,althoughasingleoperatorwouldnotnecessarilybeprecludedfromoperatingbothconcessions.Theconcessionholder(s)wouldoperatethetrainservices,controlthemovementoftrainsthroughthenetworkandmaintaintheHSRnetwork.
ThepreferredmodelforAustraliahascommonelementswithmanyoftheworld’sHSRlines,althoughoverallitisperhapsclosesttotheJapanesemodelfornewHSRlines.InJapan,asinglestate-ownedentity(JRTT)isresponsibleforthedevelopmentandstrategicmanagementoftheHSRnetwork,butoperationoftrainservices,controlofthemovementoftrainsandmaintenanceoflinesiscarriedoutby(mainly)privatesectortrainoperatingcompaniesservingparticularhighspeedroutesonanexclusivebasis,forwhichtheypayJRTTafeeforuseoftheline.
Delivering the public sector components of a future HSR programIfadopted,afutureHSRprogramwouldbedevelopedindiscretephases,startingwithinitialfeasibilitystudiesandinvestigations,leadingontoconstructionandoperationoftheHSRsystem.Fourseparatephasescanbeidentified,asillustratedinFigure ES-18.
Executive Summary
FigureES-18 FourphasesoftheHSRprogram
1Preparation & corridor protection
2Detailed planning & procurement
3Construction
4Operation
Figure ES-19
ThefirstphaseinafutureHSRprogramwouldbeapreparationandcorridorprotectionphase,whichwouldprecedeaformalcommitmenttobuildtheHSRsystem.Thisphasewouldprovidethenecessarypolicyfoundationfortheprocurement,constructionandoperationofafutureHSRprogram.Itwouldrequirealignmentbetweentheparticipatinggovernmentsontheprogramobjectives,mechanismsandtimeframesforresolvingissues,andthedeliveryofenablingregulationorlegislation.
Theproposedmodelforpursuingmulti-jurisdictionalagreementsofthetypeneededtosupporttheHSRprogramistoadopta‘gatedapproach’usingaseriesofformalagreements.Eachformalagreementintheprocesswouldneedtobeinplacepriortoprogressingtothenextstage,ensuringalignmentofgovernmentsatcriticalmilestones.ThefirstgatewouldbeaMemorandumofUnderstanding(MoU)betweentheAustralian,ACTandstategovernmentstoformalisetheengagementontheHSRprogramandtosetouttheresponsibilitiesoftheparties,theprocesstobefollowedandthetimelinesforresolvingissues.Subsequentgateswouldinvolveformalinter-governmentalagreements(IGAs),firsttoprotectanHSRcorridorandlatertodevelopandimplementastageorstagesofHSR.
OncethereisamandatetoimplementapreferredHSRsystem,apublicly-ownedHSRdevelopmentauthority(HSRDA)wouldbecreatedtodevelop,procureandintegratetheHSRsystem,includingprocuringandowningtherequiredland.Asinglecoordinatingauthority,withappropriateprofessionalmanagementexpertise,wouldberequiredtoeffectivelyandefficientlyprogressthedetailedplanningrequiredtodevelopandprocureanHSRsystem(theHSRDAwouldlaterevolveintoanHSRdevelopmentandmanagementauthorityintheoperationalphase,andwouldprepareandmanagetrainoperationsconcessions).TheHSRDAcouldbeownedjointlybytheAustralianGovernment,ACTGovernmentandrelevantstategovernments.
High Speed Rail Phase 2 / 41
Next stepsIfitweredecidedthatthecaseforHSRontheeastcoastofAustraliahassufficientmeritforfurthergovernmentactiontobetaken,thereareanumberofimmediatenextstepsintheprocessthatcouldleadtoadecisiontoprotecttheHSRcorridorandpossiblytoadecisiontoimplementHSR.
TheimmediatenextstepfollowingcompletionoftheHSRstudyistoconfirmtheAustraliangovernment’sinterestincontinuingthenecessarypreparatoryworkstoinformaformalministerialdecisiontoproceed.
Followingadecisiontoproceed,anMoUwouldbesignedtoallowplanninganddevelopmentwork,includingcorridorprotection,tocommence.GovernmentswouldneedtocommitresourcesandfundingtothedevelopmentanddeliveryofthearrangementsundertheMoU.
TheMoUwouldinitiateanumberofactivities,includingsiteinvestigationsnecessaryforcorridorprotectionandpreparationoftheIGAtoprotecttheHSRcorridor.TheaimoftheIGAwouldbetoformalisethecommitmenttotheprotectionoftheHSRcorridorbyrezoning,resuming,purchasingorholdinglandwithinthecorridor.