high speed printed circuit board design - universiteit … · -reduction of crosstalk and radiation...

62
1 Frits J.K. Buesink, Senior Researcher EMC [email protected] Picture or Drawing 20.7 x 8.6 cm UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE. TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING. High Speed Printed Circuit Board Design Engineering Compatible Equipment UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE. TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING. Table of Contents 2 HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013 - Mechanisms DM-CM, R, C and L effects Signal Integrity and Crosstalk, Transfer Impedance - Electrically Long Interconnections: Transmission Lines Reflections, Characteristic impedance, Propagation delay, PCB configurations, Critical line length, Discontinuities, Near and Far end Crosstalk, Attenuation asymptote, Transfer impedance in transmission lines - Measures Wide metal planes, Current boundaries, Circuit analysis, Placement and routing - Reduction of Crosstalk and Radiation of High Speed Printed Circuit Boards Current Boundaries, Signal to Noise Transformation Power Integrity Part Ι Part ΙΙ

Upload: nguyendang

Post on 29-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Frits J.K. Buesink, Senior Researcher [email protected]

Picture or Drawing 20.7 x 8.6 cm

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

High Speed Printed Circuit Board Design

Engineering Compatible Equipment

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Table of Contents

2HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

- Mechanisms

DM-CM, R, C and L effects Signal Integrity and Crosstalk, Transfer Impedance

- Electrically Long Interconnections: Transmission Lines

Reflections, Characteristic impedance, Propagation delay, PCB configurations,

Critical line length, Discontinuities, Near and Far end Crosstalk,

Attenuation asymptote, Transfer impedance in transmission lines

- Measures

Wide metal planes, Current boundaries, Circuit analysis, Placement and routing

- Reduction of Crosstalk and Radiation of High Speed Printed Circuit Boards

Current Boundaries, Signal to Noise Transformation

Power Integrity

Part Ι

Part ΙΙ

2

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Table of Contents

3HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

- Mechanisms

DM-CM, R, C and L effects Signal Integrity and Crosstalk, Transfer Impedance

- Electrically Long Interconnections: Transmission Lines

Reflections, Characteristic impedance, Propagation delay, PCB configurations,

Critical line length, Discontinuities, Near and Far end Crosstalk,

Attenuation asymptote, Transfer impedance in transmission lines

Part Ι

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Elementary Electromagnetic Principles

a. What about currents?

4HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

I1 I2

I3213 III +=

Kirchhoff’s Electrical Current Law

Ia Ib

Every current must

have a return path!ba Ι=Ι

when applied to one conductor…

3

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Interconnections: Common Mode Current “Leaks Out”

every current has a return path! where does your (return) current flow?

5HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Source Load

“Ground”

Icm

“Common-mode” current

“Differential-mode” currentIdm

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Interconnections: Common Mode Current “Leaks Out”

the path of the common-mode current could be a second, comparable circuit

6HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Source Load

Icm“Common-mode” current

“Differential-mode” currentIdm

Several mechanisms are possible:

• Resistive

• Capacitive

• Inductive

4

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Coupling: Resistance, Capacitance, Inductance

resistive coupling is known as the “Ι x R” effect (linear)

7HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

signal 1

common return

signal 2

V1

V2

RS1

RS2

RL1

RL2

trace resistance: negligible vs RS&RL

return resistance: very small

Ι1

Ι2

source of

(common) resistance crosstalk

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Coupling : Resistance, Capacitance, Inductance

usually parasitic effects (could be intentional , e.g. in a filter)

8HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

signal 1

common return

signal 2

V1

V2

RS1

RS2

RL1

RL2

Ι1

Ι2

source of

capacitive crosstalk

C12

C1R

C2R

C1R C2R

C12

capacitances in [F/m]

5

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Coupling : Resistance, Capacitance, Inductance

usually parasitic effects (could be intentional)

9HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

signal 1

common return

signal 2

V1

V2

RS1

RS2

RL1

RL2

Ι1

Ι2

source of

inductive crosstalk

M12

L1 L2

M12

inductances in [H/m]

L1

L2

Lreturn

k=

Coupling Coefficient

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Inductive EMI Effects

Every current is accompanied by a magnetic field (conditio sine qua non)

10HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

H = Magnetic Field [A/m] - H

Magnetic Flux Density:

B = µ.H

= current towards reader

Legend

= current into paper

original current conductor return current conductor

6

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Combined Magnetic Field Pattern (Moiré Effect)

two radial line patterns model the actual magnetic field pattern

11HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Conductors collocate:

complete cancellation

Conductors close:

complex patterns

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Elementary Electromagnetic Principles

What about voltages? Faraday’s and Lenz’ Law

12HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law

Us

R1

R2

UR1

UR

2

021 =++ RRS UUU

Faraday’s Law:

?

The minus sign indicates that the induced

voltage, when shorted, would produce a

current with a magnetic field opposing the

original field direction!

This effect is referred to as Lenz’ Law

7

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Elementary Electromagnetic Principles

magnetic field changes induce voltages in conductor loops (self-inductance)

13HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

loop 1flux Φ

( )2

2

1iLE ⋅⋅=Energy contained in Magnetic Field: [Joule]

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

A Wire Loop on a PCB Groundplane

to demonstrate the effect of changes in looparea

14HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

8

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Connection Diagram Self Induction Demonstration

15HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The Spiking Effect is Worst if Loop is Large

a small loop can also be realized by routing the wire against the reference

16HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Large Inductance

for

Large Loop

Small Loop

means

Small Inductance

• Spiking occurs for fast risetime signals (<10ns, this case)

• Spiking disappears for slow risetime (≈1 µs)

9

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Time Domain Response of Self Induction Board

spike on channel 1 shows time needed to build up magnetic field

17HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Channel 1

Channel 2

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Frequency Domain Response of Self Induction Board

high frequencies are attenuated if the loop is made larger

18HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

10

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Setting up the Spectrum Analyzer (SA) for Transfer

19HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

SA “Transfer” Measurement 1 MHz – 1 GHz

20HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

11

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Better Performance with Foil on Top

21HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Wide ground planes also show: the Skin Effect

related effect of Lenz’Law and the basis for shielding absorption

22HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Ι

Current

Source

0 dInduced Eddy currents oppose

direction of external current

(Lenz’ Law)Sheet metal

Ed

dy c

urr

en

ts

curr

ent

density

0 d

J0

δ

e

J0

δ

d

d eJJ−

⋅= 0

12

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Lenz’s Law, Proximity effect

current concentrates under conductor, minimizing loop inductance

23HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Ι

Current concentrates under

conductor (proximity effect)

R=50Ω

Field distribution can be

measured with small

sniffer probe

x

J(x)

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Conductor geometry determines local field patterns

PCB designer assignment: reduce generated fields in the environment

24HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Lenz’Law automatically minimizes fields around signal/return conductors:

Fields concentrate under trace over ground plane.

This is known as the proximity effect

PCB Trace 1

PCB Trace 2

Relative field level

or

return current density distribution in ground plane

Two groundplanes further reduce fields

(in the environment) currents now spread

over both return planes (!)

see also: slide 22 on skin effect

13

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Return Current Distribution Magnitude in Ground Plane

lowering the trace reduces volume “filled with flux”

25HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

H

D

J0 or Φ0 JD or ΦD

2

001

1

+

≈Φ

Φ=

H

DJ

J DDSource:

Johnson, H

“High-Speed

Digital Design”

1993

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Skin Effect, Proximity Effect, Induction

Two messages

26HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

1. Keep all signal lines close to their return conductors

on a PCB this choice is made at design time!

2. Make return conductors as wide as possible (A-Symmetric)and, if possible enclose the signal line in the return

(coax, not so easy on a Printed Circuit Board)

compromise: use 2 wide return conductors above and below (strip-line)

Symmetric: ws = wr

ws

wr

ws

A-Symmetric: ws<< wr

wr

14

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Lenz’ Law: the Board

PCB traces with different widths and return paths

27HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Lenz’ Law PCB: the Schematic Diagram

seven PCB traces with different widths and return paths

28HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

6. Trace on Ground Plane

7. Trace on Ground Plane with adjacent “Guard Traces”

Ground Via

5. Trace on Edge of Ground Plane

4. Thin Long Trace (big ‘loop’far from ground trace)

3. Wide ‘Meandering’ Trace (big loop, far from ground plane)

2. Thin Short Trace (big loop, far from ground plane)

1. Wide Short Trace (big loop, far from ground plane)

Sq

ua

re-w

ave

Ge

ne

rato

r

Effects shown previously form the basis for this set of experiments

50

Te

rmin

ate

with

50

Ωlo

ad

scope

hop

inputs

15

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Lenz’s Law Board Demo

generator/channel 1(A) on one of Uout(1—7), channel 2(B) on Uin (!)

29HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Transfer Impedance ZT

any interconnection may pick up or produce common mode currents

30HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

external noise source

Inoise

Unoise

1. Coupling into external noise

cable length D

Idesired

return current flows where?

?

2. Generation of noise in other conductors

(e.g. “ground”)

DI

UZ

noise

noiseT

⋅=

[Ohm per meter]

16

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Coupling of Circuit Loops: Mutual induction

field loop 1 induces voltage in loop 2: crosstalk, transformer, reduction of ZT

31HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

I1

loop 1

loop 2

MModel:

flux Φ11

2

12

loop

loop

IM

Φ=

1

11

IL

Φ=

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Transformer Principle with a Printed Circuit Board

bottom line: a PCB can act as a (CM) noise source into the outside world

32HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Coupled Flux

trace

ground plane = return conductor

Bottom Line: a Printed Circuit Board has Transfer-Impedance!

ΙCM

17

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Mechanism of the transfer impedance

common-mode current flows in return impedance, M reduces ZT

33HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Ιcm

RS LS

L1

R0

Uin

Cable

Vin

MS1

cmSMjU Ι⋅⋅= 1ω

( )Scmin LjRU ω+Ι= ( )( )1SSScmin MLjRU −+Ι= ω

Transfer Inductance (LT)

1

S

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Demonstration of Transfer Impedance

uses several cables to demonstrate the effects

34HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

18

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Transfer Impedance Demo Schematic Diagram

generator loaded with 1 ohm and cable shield

35HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Generator Analyzer

(50 Ω in)

51

51

51

ZT = 1 Ωis -34 dB

(conversion to dBΩ)

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measured Impedances for UTP & Coax with/without Pig Tail

36HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

0 dBΩ line

19

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Cable ZT Assessment on Measurement Receiver

37HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Trace Separation over Groundplane is Important

once a wide metal plane is used for flux reduction

38HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

H

D

Current distribution of Ιsource over ground plane is

measure of flux density, Φ, coupling into cable:

at source ~L, at victim ~M!

source

sourcesourceL

Ι

Φ≈

source

victim

victim

sourceMΙ

Φ≈

proximity effect

closer line

“catches” more flux

20

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Mutual induction in practice

crosstalk created by mutual induction between two loops

source (50Ω)

scope

“ground” litz wire

single wire (source)

single wire (passive)

Only a change in current produces crosstalk!

39

50 Ω

dt

dIVnoise ~

B

50

Ω

A

Note that a slower rise time

produces less or no crosstalk at all!

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Ground Plane

Wide ground plane is preferred

return path for current!

HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Mutual induction in practice

noise greatly reduced with wide return conductor (ground plane)

source (50Ω)

scope

single wire (source)

single wire (passive)

40

50 Ω

B

50

Ω

A

Icm “squeezes”

under cable

(proximity

effect)

21

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Coupling/Crosstalk Effects at Low Frequencies

Resistive, Capacitive and Inductive effects with simple equations

41HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

RU sourcenoise ⋅Ι~

or

orR

U sourcenoise ~Ι

112 loopnoise MjV Ι⋅−= ω

EjAenoise ⋅⋅⋅=Ι ωε 0

Inductive:

Capacitive:

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Table of Contents

42HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

- Mechanisms

DM-CM, R, C and L effects Signal Integrity and Crosstalk, Transfer Impedance

- Electrically Long Interconnections: Transmission Lines

Reflections, Characteristic impedance, Propagation delay, PCB configurations,

Critical line length, Discontinuities, Near and Far end Crosstalk,

Attenuation asymptote, Transfer impedance in transmission lines

Part Ι

22

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

What Frequency is High and what is a Low Frequency?

wavelength or rise time is the key in comparison to interconnection length

43HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

“Small” ≤ 10% of Critical size

Analog world:

Critical size = half wavelength fmax [m]

Digital world:

Critical size = length of the rising edge [m]

τpd = X [ns/m] prop. delay

τr = Y [ns]

][msizeCriticalpd

r

τ

τ=

Achievement of EMC is easier on “small” systems (low frequencies)

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Combined Effects Above the Critical Frequency

example: crosstalk between two 3 [m] parallel lines

44HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

1 103

× 1 104

× 1 105

× 1 106

× 1 107

× 1 108

× 1 109

×

100−

80−

60−

40−

20−

0

Frequency [Hz]

Cro

ssta

lk [

dB

]

Resistive Effects “Transmission line” Effects

InductiveEffects

Capacitive

Critical Frequency

“Low Frequency”

Approach Acceptable

23

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Charactristic Impedance and Propagation Delay

a function of “per unit length” (PUL) parameters

45HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

speed νννν

L/2

L/2

Cv(t) i(t) v(t+δδδδt)i(t+δδδδt)

δδδδx

[ ]Ω==C

LZ

ti

tv0

)(

)(Characteristic Impedance

Ratio

⋅==

m

nsCLPD

ντ

1Propagation Delay

Z0

Loss Free transmission line

ZSZL

VS

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Transmission Lines and Signal Integrity

when properly terminated, only delay remains; otherwise: reflections occur

46HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

RS

(50

Ω)RL

(50 Ω)

So

urc

e

Lo

ad

VS

Coax Cable (50 Ω)

2SV

time delay

A

B

Scope Picture

B

A

SV

Without RL:

Reflections!

24

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Long interconnections: transmission lines

terminated in characteristic impedance

47HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

50

Ω

coax cable

Waveform for fast edge

stable impedance over length

A B

A

B

Using a cable,

appropriate for the job,

transient effects disappear

propagation delay remains

3 m RG58

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Long interconnections: transmission lines

if electrically “long” measures are needed to avoid reflections

48HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

A

coax cable

Waveform for fast edge

cable without termination

B

A

B

Long cable (50Ω line)

without termination:

reflections!

25

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

High Frequency Model for a Current Loop

“electrons in tube” model cannot be used for electrically long lines

49HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Source Load

Low Frequency Model for Current Loop

Source Load

High Frequency Model for Current Loop

++

--

Wave direction

ΙDM

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Reflections when Source or Load Impedance ≠≠≠≠ Z0

bounces back and forth between load and source until dissipated

50HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

S

SIncident

ZZ

ZVV

+

⋅=

0

0

incident wave direction

0

0

ZZ

ZZtcoefficienreflection

L

LL

+

−== ρ

VLreflected wave direction

+

−=

0

0

ZZ

ZZVV

L

Lincidentreflected Load

position

Z0ZS

ZLVS

VL

Initially, Source “sees”Line Impedance only(Voltage Divider)

Load “sees” incidentwave + reflection

26

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Reflection repeats until “dissipated”

either by source, load or successive attenuations

51HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

0

0

ZZ

ZZ

L

LL

+

−=ρ

0

0

ZZ

ZZ

S

SS

+

−=ρ

first reflection

+

−=

0

0)1(

ZZ

ZZVV

L

Lincidentreflected

second

reflection

+

−=

0

0)1()2(

ZZ

ZZVV

S

Sreflectedreflected

incident wave

S

SIncident

ZZ

ZVV

+

⋅=

0

0

VS VL

Z0ZS

ZLVS

VL

Initially, Source “sees”Line Impedance only(Voltage Divider)

Load “sees” incidentwave + reflection

LoadSource

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Termination: three situations depending on ρρρρ

no reflection (impedance match), positive reflection and negative reflection

52HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Z0

ZL

0

0

ZZ

ZZ

L

LL

+

−=ρ

Z0 = ZL, ρL = 0, no reflected wave

Z0 < ZL, ρL = positive, positive reflected wave (add)

Z0 > ZL, ρL = negative, negative reflected wave (subtract)

0

0:ZZ

ZZ

V

VtcoefficienreflectionVoltage

L

L

i

rV

+

−==ρ

27

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Time Domain Reflectometry

fast oscilloscope + fast generator allow analysis of interconnection

53HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Fast rise time

pulse generator

integrated

fast scope

interconnections

under test

Sa

mp

ling

He

ad

50 Ω

line

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurement of shielded twisted pair (STP) line

using Time Domain Reflectometry

54HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

time

ρ

1

-1

0-0.2

0.76

ρ

0 V

2.5 V2 V

4.4 V

5 V

50 Ω

input

reflection

scope display

convers

ions

ρ

Z=

∙ 0

Z0 = 50 Ω

Z= 50∙

A

A

“33 Ω”

“open”

“shorted”

3.5 m “33 Ω”

shielded twisted pair

1 m 50 W coax

1 m coax

3.5 m STP

33 Ω

oror

sw

itch

28

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

ZS = 50 [Ω]

Z0 = 33 [Ω]

ZL = ∞ [Ω]

Vg= 5V (t ≥ 0)

Propagationdelay: T

The Lattice Diagram

simple tool / approach to show the effects of repeated reflections

55HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

t = 0:

t = T:

t = 2T:

t = 4T:

t = 3T:

ρ

= 0.2 ρ

= 1

2.0 V

2.0 + 2.0 + 0.4 =

= 4.4 V

4.4 + 0.4 + 0.08 =

= 4.88 V

2.0 + 2.0=

= 4.0 V

4.0 + 0.4 + 0.4=

= 4.8 VZ0

ZSZL

VS VL

Vg

Source: VS Load: VL

= Vg

= 2.0

time

VS

2T 4T0

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Transmission Lines on Printed Circuit Boards

micro striplines, striplines and asymmetric dual striplines

56HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Micro-Stripline Stripline

PCB Lecher line

(only possible for one trace)

Signal

Return

Asymmetric

Dual Stripline

Buried

Micro-Stripline

d

b

t

wS

wR

εr

general dimensions

b = dielectric heightd = height over ground planet = copper thicknesswS= Trace WidthwR= Ground Plane Widthεεεεr = relative dielectric constant

order of magnitude

Z0 = 30 - 100 [ΩΩΩΩ]ττττpd = 5 - 10 [ns/m]

29

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Calculation of Z0 and ττττpd from PUL Parameters and εεεε

PUL = Per Unit Length

57HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

ττττpd[s/m]

Z0[Ω]

L[H/m]

C[F/m]

CLeffpd ⋅=⋅⋅= 00 µεετC

LZ =0

0ZC

pdτ=

pdZL τ⋅= 0

),,,,( rtbdwfL ε= ),,,,( rtbdwfC ε=

Note: see e.g. Motorola AN1051

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Capacitive Loading

initial bus line impedance must be higher than 50 [Ω]

58HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

input circuits

Bus Line (Z0)

C C C C C C C C C C C

equivalent capacitive load on line (∆∆∆∆C per meter)

C

Bus Line (Z0)

Initial Bus Impedance:

C

LZ =0

Loaded Bus Impedance:

CC

LZL

∆+=

L and C are Per Unit Length Parameters

Electrically Short Stubs

30

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

What Makes a Transmission Line Long?

determined by wavelength of highest frequency in the transported signal

59HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

A

50%

90%

10%

τh

τr

Fknee

hτπ ⋅

1

rτπ ⋅

1

rτ⋅2

1

F1 F2

am

plit

ude

log (frequency)

f

1~

2

1~

f

Signal on Digital Board:

A Trapezoid in the Time DomainCharacterized by:Rise or Fall Time: ττττr

Pulse Duration: ττττh

Fknee source:

Johnson, H

“High-Speed

Digital Design”

1993

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Critical Line Length: Analog and Digital Worlds

half wavelength of Fknee equals length of leading edge

60HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

[ ]mX2

λ=

X

Analog World

[ ]mXpd

r

τ

τ=

Digital World

[ ]mF pd

r

r

pdkneeFknee

τ

τ

ττ

υλ=

⋅⋅⋅

=⋅

=

2

12

1

22

=

s

m

pdτυ

1

propagationspeed:

[ ]1

2

1 −

⋅= sF

r

kneeτ

31

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

A Line is Long if FKNEE approaches FCross-Over

FCO is a property (related to length) of the the actual line

61HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

FCross-Over or FCO is related to actual Line Length

One “Half Wavelength” of FCO fits the line (or cable) length

FCO is also called the “Critical Frequency”

Fknee

hτπ ⋅

1

rτπ ⋅

1

rτ⋅2

1

F1 F2

am

plit

ude

log (frequency)

Fknee is related to Signal Rise (or Fall) Time

Sig

na

l P

rop

ert

y: F

KN

EE

Ph

ysic

al L

ine

Pro

pe

rty: F

CO

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Comparison of some Logic Families

knee frequencies and corresponding critical lengths

62HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Logic Family Rise Time

[s]

Knee Frequency

[MHz]

Critical length

in FR4 [m] )*

“Low Frequency” (Crit./6) [m]

4000 CMOS 10-6 0.5 143 24

HCMOS 10-8 50 1.43 0.24

LVCMOS 3x10-9 167 0.43 0.07

AHCMOS 10-9 500 0.143 0.02

Note: Lines over this Length need “Transmission Line Treatment”

)* Using Strip Line Propagation Delay: τpd = 7 [ns/m]

Advice: Choose the Slowest Acceptable Logic Family if there is a Choice!

FKneelcrit=

λ

=

ν

32

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Transfer Impedance of a PCB Interconnection

all interconnections have it, PCB traces are no exception!

63HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

D

UZ

cm

noiseT

⋅Ι=

+-

Ιcm

Unoise

Das receiver….

as source…. Ιdm

Udm

Ιnoise

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Printed Circuit Board has transfer impedance

Either susceptible or emitting! Connected cabling acts as antennae

64HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

“Twin-wires”

traces over ground trace or plane = two conductor interconnections!

reduced fields and noise

antenna

antenna

Vnoise Vnoise

AS = 0 0 < AS < 1

33

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Avoid “Long Stubs” route a “Daisy Chain”!

certainly no branches longer than the critical length

65HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Instead of this…

Try this…

output /driver

input/load

input/loadinput/load

input +termination

Use high-currentdriver when

located mid-line

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Discontinuities in the Signal Trace

Impedance change and branches

66HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

34

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurements on Discontinuities Board (1)

top line 1 almost 50 Ohms

67HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

50 Ω

ρ

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurements on Discontinuities Board (2)

line 2: 100 Ohms

68HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

50 Ω

ρ

100 Ω

ρ

ρ

+⋅=1

150Znote:

35

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurements on Discontinuities Board (3)

line 3: partly 65, partly 117 Ohms

69HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

65 Ω

ρ

117 Ω

ρ

ρ

+⋅=1

150Znote:

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurements on Discontinuities Board (4)

line 4: impedance decreases as lines dissect; multiple reflections

70HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

50 Ω

ρ

100 Ω

ρ

ρ

+⋅=1

150Znote:

first side-track (drop to 59 Ω)

second side-track (to 46 Ω)

36

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Discontinuities (Video)

71HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Vias in Signal Traces

return current needs a path too: if not available, it will find one elsewhere!

72HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Signal traceReference 1

Reference 2

Reference 2

Reference 3

?

?

A

B

C

Signal trace

37

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Provide a return current path when “changing layers”

shoot ground-via in close proximity (existing well within critical length O.K.)

73HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Signal traceReference 1

Reference 2

Reference 2

Reference 3

A

B

C

Signal trace

The Ground Viaprovides a Pathfor the Return Current

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Discontinuities in the Return Current Path

ground plane interruptions

74HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

38

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurements on the Ground Slot Board (1)

Track 1, wide slot; unaided—with ground trace—with capacitively coupled ground trace

75HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

50 Ω

ρ

100 Ω

ρ

ρ

+⋅=1

150Znote:

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Wide Ground Slot (Video)

76HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

39

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurements on the Ground Slot Board (2)

Track 2, 1.8 mm slot; unaided—covered with metal plate

77HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

50 Ω

ρ

90 Ω

ρ

ρ

+⋅=1

150Znote:

59 mm 1.8 mm

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Narrow Ground Slot (Video)

78HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

40

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Crosstalk when Risetime << Line Propagation Delay

effects occur at the current location of the transition

79HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Capacitive

iC (forward)iC (backward)

Near end Far end

Inductive

M

i

iL (backward)

Near end Far end

iC (forward) - iL (backward)iC (backward) + iL (backward)

Propagation

Direction

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Influence of Propagation Delay on Shape of Crosstalk

“Far End” goes with Incident Wave, “Near End” returns for two line delays

80HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Near end Far end

t = 0

t = T = l. τpd

“now”

t = 2T =2 l. τpd

≈ rise time

tim

e

distance0 l

Source: Johnson, H.W. et. al. “High-Speed Digital Design”, Prentice Hall,New Jersey, 1993

Far end:

signal edge

and crosstalk

arrive together

Near end:

Crosstalk

spreads out

over time

41

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Crosstalk above the Critical Frequency has a Ceiling!

maximum is at “attenuation” [dB] below the signal level on active trace

81HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Critical frequency (λλλλ/2 fits tracelength)

Transmission Line

resistive crosstalk

0 [dB] = Signal Level on Active Trace

“Attenuation”

+⋅=

PUL

PULPUL

M

MLnAttenuatio log20

Prerequisites: 1. Traces Identical 2. Lines Terminated in Z0 (both ends)

USIG Spectrum

6critF

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Crosstalk on Printed Circuit Boards: Inductive (LF)

2

001

1

+

≈Φ

Φ=

H

DJ

J DD

82HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

current density in ground plane is proportional to local mutual induction

ActiveTrace

PassiveTrace

Self-Inductanceof Active Trace “L”

Mutual-Inductanceof Passive Trace “M”with respect toActive Trace

Both are usually expressed as “Per Unit Length” Parameters!

D

H

Using the current distribution in the ground planethe mutual inductance can be calculatedgiven the geometry of the board cross-section:

42

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Combination of capacitive and inductive crosstalk

depending on load of source line, capacitive or inductive effects dominate

83HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

50 Ω instrument

or termination

50 Ω instrument

or termination

50 Ω generator

50 Ω lines

Termination

select switch

H

E Z0

active line

passive line

(Source) (Load)

Original Source:

J.J. Goedbloed

“EMC”, Kluwer 1993

Passive Line

Active Line

Near End Far End

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Crosstalk on PCB Demonstration (Proto)

Board with active trace and “20” and “30” [dB] Passive traces

84HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

ActiveTrace

-20 [dB]Trace

-30 [dB]Trace

Tracelengths: active 430 [mm]

-20 [dB] 430 [mm]

-30 [dB] 430 [mm]

FR4: εr = 4.7 εeff = 3.75

43

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Crosstalk PCB with “20 & 30 [dB] Attenuation” Lines

three micro stripline traces, total length each: 43 [cm]

85HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

εr = 4.7

2.7 [mm] 2.7 [mm] 2.7 [mm]

6 [mm] 2 [mm]

1.6 [mm]

-30

[d

B]

Pa

ssiv

e tra

ce

-20

[d

B]

Pa

ssiv

e tra

ce

Active

tra

ce

Trace Impedances: 50 [ΩΩΩΩ]

Propagation Delay: 5.2 [ns/m]

Trace Inductance: 264 [nH/m]

Trace Capacitance: 103 [pF/m]

Effective Dielectric Constant: εεεεr = 3.75

Trace ParametersSeparation 2 [mm] 6 [mm]

Mutual Inductance [nH/m] 27 9

Mutual Capacitance [pF/m] 11 3.4

IEEE Trans. on EMC Vol. 55 No. 4 Aug. 2013

“Overview of Signal Integrity and EMC Design Technologies on PCB”

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Crosstalk Measurement Results for Test PCB

all traces terminated. note: most analysers have a linear frequency scale

86HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

“20 [dB]” Trace

“30 [dB]” Trace

20 [dB] Attenuation Trace

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

1.00E+06 2.01E+08 4.01E+08 6.01E+08 8.01E+08 1.00E+09 1.20E+09

linear frequency scale

20 [dB] Attenuation Trace

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

1.00E+06 1.00E+07 1.00E+08 1.00E+09

logarithmic frequency scale

174 [MHz]

44

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

SA Measurement on Crosstalk Experiment

87HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measurement of crosstalk PCB in the Time Domain

using fast Time Domain Reflectometer (TDR) Tektronix CSA 803

88HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

active trace(terminated)

far end

near end

clearance 2 [mm]

clearance 6 [mm]

45

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Summary of Effects

designable parameters: asymmetry and line length

89HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

line length

Shorter LineLonger Line

- Att

line geometry

moreasymmetry

lessasymmetry

log(frequency)

cro

ssta

lk[d

B]

0

(attenuation)

Longer Line:LF and MF

crosstalk increases

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The End of Part ΙΙΙΙ

90HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

1. H.W.Johnson, M. Graham “High Speed Digital Design, A Handbook of

Black Magic” Prentice Hall, 1993, ISBN 0-13-395724-1

2. J.J. Goedbloed, “EMC”, Prentice Hall, 1992, ISBN 0-13-249293-8

3. H.W. Ott “EMC Engineering”, Wiley, 2009, ISBN 978-0-470-18930-6

6. F.J.K.Buesink “Printed Circuit Boards for the Education aimed at

Understandig Electromagnetic Effects”, User manual, University of

Twente, 2009http://www.utwente.nl/ewi/te/education/emc_demonstration_boards/Understandingelectro

magnetic_Effects_using_PCB_demos.pdf

7. IEEE “EMC Education Manual”, 1992http://www.emcs.org/pdf/EMCman.pdf

46

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Table of Contents

91HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

- Measures

Wide metal planes, Current boundaries, Circuit analysis, Placement and routing

- Reduction of Crosstalk and Radiation of High Speed Printed Circuit Boards

Current Boundaries, Signal to Noise Transformation

Power Integrity

Part ΙΙ

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The Principle of the Current Boundary

a provision to split loops (and shut out noise sources)

92HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

“Ground 1” “Ground 2”

Icm (noise current)

loop closes through “ground”

“Ground 2”“Ground 1”Icm

loop closes through “ground”

Create one or more “inner-loops”Short

circuit(s)

reduce looparea

check

module 1

module 2

(Mains cord 1)

(Mains cord 2)(I/O cable 1-2)

Situation in practicedetector:

AM-radio

47

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The concept of a current boundary on a PCB (1)

concept model

93HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Module A

groundplane

Module B

conceptual boundary

boundary

Signal

Return

(Plane)

ground(-plane)

Signal

Return

boundary

decouplingcapacitor

to common

power supply

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The concept of a current boundary on a PCB (2)

traditionally, PCB edge forms boundary: interface electronics resides there

94HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

B

A

Sig

nal

tow

ard

s A

Sig

nal

tow

ard

s B

Po

wer

Lin

e

= buffer (can be bidirectional)

deco

up

lin

g c

ap

acit

or

Improvement:

• No current can pass unattended from module 1 to module 2

• Sources and Sinks of DM current are placed on the boundary

• All DM signals are “processed/polished” at the boundary

Note: Power Line Decoupling at a

Current Boundary is Not Possible

when Power Planes are used!

48

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Equivalent of Cable System Current Boundaries on PCB’s

quasi active shielding using a ground plane

95HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Instead of

Cable Categories

we now have

Trace categories!

note: power supply is decoupled with capacitance to ground plane (see slide 134)

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Difference between Analog and Digital Circuits

analog: differences in currents & frequencies; digital: all signals are similar

96HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

C OUT

D

C IN

P0P1

P2

P3

UP/DNGND

VCC

PRE EN

CLK

Q0

Q1Q2

Q3

D Q

Q

Q

PRE

PRE GND

Q

Clock

Board lay-out Analog Circuits

separate current loops

sort loops: largest dΙ/dt smallest

minimize “common impedance”

Board lay-out Synchronous Digital

separate data from clocks&strobes

data/address lines may crosstalk

keep clock and strobe lines “clean”

49

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The Current Return Path is Important!

just a ground symbol is not sufficient

97HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

“ ”Is not enough!

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Simple High Speed PCB Stackup

two copper layers, suitable for “home fabrication”

98HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Component side = Ground Plane

Traces on 1.6 [mm] FR-4 board over ground plane

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Trace Width [mm]

Tra

ce I

mp

ed

an

ce [

Oh

m]

drill out copperfor pins not connected

to ground

1.6 [mm]

Propagation Delay: 5.2 [ns/m](MicroStripLine)

Notes:

Use wire jumpers

for “impossible” connections

Impedance considerations only

needed for long lines!

(>> 0.1 x critical length)

Interference from environment may havehigher frequencies than thosegenerated on the board!

50

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Discontinuities in Transmission Lines

two solutions: end termination and series termination

99HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

End Termination:

Z0

GND

+ VDD

VME Bus(Both Ends)

330 Ω

470 Ω

R = Z0

(NoGo: HighDissipation)

R

R = Z0

CTerm ≈≈≈≈ (2∙FCO∙R)-1

RCTerm

make sure line is “constant impedance”(Strip Line or Micro Strip Line)Average Impedance ≈≈≈≈ 50 [ΩΩΩΩ]

open endZ0

GND

ZSSeries Termination:R ≈ |Z0 - ZS|

Only use this method for point to point interconnections

proper transition seriousringing

A. ResistiveLoad

B. CapacitiveCoupling

C. T

heven

inN

etw

ork

short with respect to critical length!

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Effect of End Termination on Transmission Line

Low impedance driver on high(er) impedance line

100HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Propagation delay UTP: ττττPD = 4.8 [ns/m], i.e. for length len = 3 [m]: nslent PDprop 4.14=⋅= τ

3 m “Z0 = 120Ω” line

Sourc

e 5

?“open” end

ρS = -0.41 ρL = 1

Vg = 5 V

T: 7 V(!)

0:

3.5 V

2T:

3.5+3.5-1.4 =

= 5.6 V

3T:

7 -1.4 -1.4 =

4.2 V

51

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Simulation with LTSPICE

101HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Effect of End Termination on Transmission Line

demonstration using 3 [m] unshielded twisted pair line of 120Ω

102HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Propagation delay UTP: ττττPD = 4.8 [ns/m], i.e. for length len = 3 [m]: nslent PDprop 4.14=⋅= τ

[ ]pFtoZ

lenC PD

Term 1501200

≈⋅

λ

2

=

∙∙

≈35 MHz

3 m “Z0 = 120Ω” line

50

Ωsourc

e

RL

= 1

20 Ω

CTerm ≈ total line capacitance

0 =#$

#$

τ#%= #$ ∙ #$

#$ =τ

= 40pF/m

+,-. ≥1

2 ∙ 0 ∙

150 pF

52

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Table of Contents

103HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

- Measures

Wide metal planes, Current boundaries, Circuit analysis, Placement and routing

- Reduction of Crosstalk and Radiation of High Speed Printed Circuit Boards

Current Boundaries, Signal to Noise Transformation

Power Integrity

Part ΙΙ

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Practical example: Emissions from a PCB

dual sided board with “as much ground plane as possible”

104HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Printed Circuit Board withwired connections on all sides

EMC limit violations up to 20 [dB]

53

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Same PCB, Ground Plane Apertures covered with Foil

now the system is within its emission limits!

105HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

No more limit violations!

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Method of Trace Separation on Printed Circuit Boards

reduce mutual induction by separation over ground plane or use skin effect

106HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

distance reduces coupling

Skin effect reduces coupling

54

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Power Supply Decoupling

close to fast circuits; propagation speeds are equal for signal and power!

107HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Effective

Loop

Area AE

∆∆∆∆i

∆∆∆∆t

∆∆∆∆Vsupplyvoltagetolerance

t

VCi

∂⋅=capacitor equation:

max

minV

tiC

∆⋅∆=

decoupling capacitor

design goal:

C

PCB traces

PCB traces

bo

nd

ing

wir

es

bo

nd

ing

wir

es

Larger C’s have more Inductance!

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Capacitors have parasitic elements

equivalent circuit diagram and high-frequency behaviour

108HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

LWire

LWire

LInternal

C

RESR

log(frequency)

|ZC|

fresonance

RESR

1SUMLω

55

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Parasitic Elements can be Located on the Board!

keep PCB traces short, select smallest capacitor for the job (size & value)

109HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Same capacitor, different on board inductances

Resonances between 67 and 195 MHz

110HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

56

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Measuring Capacitors

111HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.112HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

57

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Frequencies > 500 MHz: Use Distributed Capacitance

instead of one capacitor use many smaller values, ultimately distributed

113HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Comparison of decoupling with four different

and four identical capacitors (Source: Ott)

100n//10n//1n//100pF

4 x 100nF

due to propagation delay, only a limited

area capacitance is available (Source Ott)

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Power Plane Combination is a Transmission Line

“attenuation” is only 6 dB! cutting up one layer into smaller patches improve it

114HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Symmetric Power Transmission Line

has large “transfer-impedance”(little noise reduction)

and large “slot-antenna” emission!

solid reference plane

“data” traces

Possible other layers

individual power “patches”

separate electronic modules

connected by “thin” traces

high εand/or

very thin!

58

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Power Planes or Power Traces?

noise on power planes is only attenuated by 6 dB

115HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Maximum symmetry

e.g. Power Planes

Asymmetry

e.g. narrow Trace over wide Ground

SN

T

frequency

SN

T

frequency

>20 dB

Attenuation 6 dB

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Simultaneous Switching Causes GroundBounce

reason is the internal (bonding) wire inductance and high current spikes

116HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Vcc

Cin Rin

Lout

LVcc

Lgnd

Icc

Iout

(smd) bypass C

Chip internal GND is lifted

from the Board GND.

Lgnd = bondwire inductance

59

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Ground Bounce: Parasitic Inductance of Bonding Wire (1)

octal bus driver, different IC packages; 3 switched outputs loaded with 47 pF

117HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

mo

nit

or

un

sw

itc

he

do

utp

uts

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Ground Bounce: Parasitic Inductance of Bonding Wire (2)

ground bounce voltages measured

118HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Vo

lts

Time

60

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The Ground Lift Problem also Affects A/D Convertors

heavy load on digital outputs lifts (digital) ground: input offset created!

119HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

=

Vin

Analog

Input

Digital Output

Long Output Bus Lines

A/D

Converter

Re

ce

ivin

g C

ircu

its

?

Buffer reduces output loadA_GND D_GND

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Solution to PCB cable noise: add current boundary

separate “inside” (PCB) from “outside” (the world)

120HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

Ιcm

noise

short-circuit

61

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

More Information

121HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

http://www.utwente.nl/ewi/te/education/

Understanding electromagnetic effects using PCB demos

High Speed PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

SigNoise

A book describing the PCB demos used

This presentation as a .pdf

Program to do calculations on PCB transmission lines

(does not run on Windows7; use Windows XP virtual PC)

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

Literature

122HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013

1. H.W.Johnson, M. Graham “High Speed Digital Design, A Handbook of

Black Magic” Prentice Hall, 1993, ISBN 0-13-395724-1

2. J.J. Goedbloed, “EMC”, Prentice Hall, 1992, ISBN 0-13-249293-8

3. H.W. Ott “EMC Engineering”, Wiley, 2009, ISBN 978-0-470-18930-6

4. F.B.J. Leferink “Reduction of Radiated Electromagnetic Fields

by Creation of Geometrical Asymmetry”, PhD Thesis, University of

Twente, 2001, ISBN 90-365-1689-7

5. F.B.J. Leferink “Power and Signal Integrity and Electromagnetic

Emission, the balancing act of decoupling, planes and tracks”, IEEE

EMC Symposium, Honolulu, 2007

6. F.J.K.Buesink “Printed Circuit Boards for the Education aimed at

Understandig Electromagnetic Effects”, User manual, University of

Twente, 2009http://www.utwente.nl/ewi/te/education/emc_demonstration_boards/Understandingelectrom

agnetic_Effects_using_PCB_demos.pdf

7. IEEE “EMC Education Manual”, 1992http://www.emcs.org/pdf/EMCman.pdf

62

UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.

TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING.

The End of Part ΙΙΙΙΙΙΙΙ

123HS PCB Design EMC Europe Brugge 2013