hidep welding process for fabrication of low-weight t
TRANSCRIPT
HiDep Welding Process for Fabrication of Low-Weight T-Stiffeners with Near-Zero
Weld Distortion for Shipbuilding
Improving the Quality and
Reducing the Cost of Navy Ships
1
NSRP Project: TIA No. 2017-426
NSRP “HiDep Process for Fabrication of Low-
Weight T-Stiffeners with Near-Zero Weld
Distortion for Shipbuilding”
• Bollinger Shipyards
• General Dynamics Bath Iron Works
• Vigor Shipyards
• EnergynTech, Inc.
• Gatekey Engineering, Inc.
• Hepinstall Consulting Group, Inc.
• Miller Electric Manufacturing
• Hobart Brothers Company
1/8
1/2
3/8
1/4
5/8
3
4
5
6
String
Deck
Out of fair is the indicated distance
Stiffeners
Automated Thermal Forming – Application
Fairness Measurement:
Cost of Weld Distortion In Navy Ships
•Can exceed ½ million dollars per hull in labor costs
•Delays schedules
•Requires additional straightening (e.g., foundations)
•Damages coatings – may necessitate re-coating
•Can compromise Structural Integrity
•Fuel gas and oxygen costs
•Workman Compensation costs
Flame Straightening to Remove Distortion
10
1993 Laser Thermal Forming
Cost of Weld Distortion In Navy Ships
11
2000 Laser Thermal Forming
Cost of Weld Distortion In Navy Ships
Aircraft Carrier Plate Forming
Steel plate and CAD model provided by Newport News Shipyard
12
2004 Laser Thermal Forming
Cost of Weld Distortion In Navy Ships
13
2004 Laser Thermal Forming
Cost of Weld Distortion In Navy Ships
“Expected DD(X) Implementation benefits include 100% increase in throughput, 80% reduction in rework, 50% reduction in direct labor costs, and 75% reduction in support labor costs. The technology can also be extended to current and future U.S. Naval surface ship fabrication (e.g., LHD, LPD, and CVN-21) which will result in additional cost avoidance for the U.S. Navy.”
14
Automated Thermal Forming – Control
Robot System:
2004 Induction Thermal Forming
March 1999 – Induction Thermal Forming
Automated Thermal Forming – Control
Robot System:
2004 Induction Thermal Forming
Automated Thermal Forming – Control
Robot Design:
Automated Thermal Forming – Application
July 2005
Automated Thermal Forming
At the end of the day:
• Less worker fatigue
• Improved Profitability
July 2005
Automated Thermal Forming
Automated Thermal Forming
PAS-Bulkhead / Hull
May 2007 21
Automated Thermal Forming
2222
Automated Thermal Forming
23
Automated Thermal Forming
24
Automated Thermal Forming
25
Automated Thermal Forming
26
Industrial Engineering Test Analysis:
Manual: 17 sections = 40 hours
Robot: 44 sections = 42 hours
2.5X Productivity (5X – Fire Watch)
Flame Straightening can exceed ½ million dollars per hull in labor costs
Automated Thermal Forming
27
Thermal Forming solves a problemAfter it occurs.
Eliminating Weld Distortion prevents the problem
1) Cold column of steel (dashed line) in the discontinuous member provides strength –
the weld deposit then pulls the continuous member (blue arrows) causing distortion
2) Heated discontinuous member cools with the weld and shrinks with the weld, does
not pull the continuous member – No Distortion.
1) Conventional Arc Weld 2) HIAW (HiDep) Weld
28
• Added 2nd Torch—Same Energy Level
29
Melting as 1st Torch PassesMelting as 2nd Torch Passes
T- Stiffener Fabrication
Depth of melting1st Weld
Penetration
Larger Weld =Greater Shrinkage
Stiffener is notStraight
Category B Data – Government Purpose RightsDistribution authorized to project participants and NSRP ASE Program representatives. Further distribution is prohibited. 29
2nd Torch—Same Energy Level
30
Melting as 1st Torch PassesMelting as 2nd Torch Passes
Depth of melting1st Weld
Penetration
Larger Weld =Greater Shrinkage
Stiffener is notStraight
Category B Data – Government Purpose RightsDistribution authorized to project participants and NSRP ASE Program representatives. Further distribution is prohibited. 30
32
Welding A Ship Structure
32
Welding A Ship Deck
33
Welding A Ship DeckWelding A Ship Deck
34
Welding A Ship Deck
35
Welding A Ship Deck
36
Weld Testing
37
Weld Testing
38
Weld Testing
39
Weld Testing
40
Weld Testing
41
Welding A Ship Deck
Fabrication of T-StiffenersMoving Part – Stationary
Welder
43
Fabrication of T-Stiffeners
40 foot Stiffeners with 24 inch Web
Moving Welder – Stationary
Part
44
Fabrication of T-Stiffeners
Fabrication of T-Stiffeners
Moving Welder – Stationary Part
Front side Back side
Fabrication of T-Stiffeners
47
Model Validation – Comparison of Measured and Predicted
HEAT FLOW MODEL
Temperature/Phase Results
HEAT FLOW MODEL
Results—Results—Reoriented to Show Both Torches
HEAT FLOW MODEL
Results—Results—Reoriented to Show Both Torches
HEAT FLOW MODEL
Weld Modeling using Neural Networks
MODELING FOR WELD ACCEPTANCE
Weld Modeling using Neural Networks
MODELING FOR WELD ACCEPTANCE
Weld Modeling using Neural Networks
MODELING FOR WELD ACCEPTANCE
Conclusions• Two-sided T-Fillet Hybrid Induction – Arc
Welding is ready for welding U. S. Navy ships.
• Hybrid Induction – Arc Welding will reduce or eliminate weld distortion
• Hybrid Induction – Arc Welding will provide a cost avoidance of several million dollars annually for the Navy
• Hybrid Induction – Arc Welding can reduce schedules by increasing welding productivity
Fabrication of T-Stiffener ½ inch plate with 24 inch web using Two Sided T-Fillet Hybrid Induction – Arc Welding
14” weld, 20 seconds = 42 inches per minute