hfa monitoring and progress reporting. 2007-2009 results of first hfa biennial review of progress...
TRANSCRIPT
Global 2007-09 HFA Review Process
Territorial Dimensions:• National: 62 countries, online HFA Monitor tool• Regional: 10 inter-governmental organisations • Global: More than 30 ISDR system partners and
platforms
Thematic Dimensions:• Early warning: WMO• Environment: UNEP • Urban risk: EMI• Gender: UNISDR, Gender Network • Recovery: UNDP BCPR, OCHA, IRP
Key components of HFA Monitor
• 3 strategic goals: assess ‘current national priorities’
• 5 priorities for action: assess progress on 22 ‘core indicators’ against five levels of progress
• 5 ‘drivers of progress’: assess level of reliance on key ‘catalysts’ for risk reduction
• 3 future outlook statements: re-assess current priorities and project future strategies
… and levels of progress
• Level 1: Minor progress with few signs of forward action or policy commitment
• Level 2: Some progress, but without systematic policy and/ or institutional commitment
• Level 3: Institutional commitment attained, but achievements are neither comprehensive nor substantial
• Level 4: Substantial achievement attained but with recognised limitations in capacities and resources
• Level 5: Comprehensive achievement with sustained commitment and capacities at all levels
Findings of the 2007-09 Global HFA Review
• Significant progress: HFA Priority 1, 5Strengthening institutional capacities, systems, policies and legislation
for disaster risk reduction; technical and institutional capacities for disaster preparedness, contingency plans
• Consistent progress: HFA Priority 2 Identification, assessment and monitoring of disaster risks;
enhancement of early warning systems
• Weak progress: HFA Priority 3 and 4Knowledge, innovation and education, raising awareness; in particular
mainstreaming of disaster risk reduction into economic, social, urban, rural, environmental, infrastructure planning