heat treatment: lecture q&p, m3 concept

27
1. Schaeffler diagram 2. M 3 Concept 3. Quenching & Partitioning Heat Treatments 1 Lecture Series- C

Upload: muhammad-ali-siddiqui

Post on 16-Apr-2017

726 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

1

1. Schaeffler diagram2. M3 Concept 3. Quenching & Partitioning Heat Treatments

Lecture Series- C

Page 2: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

2

• The Schaeffler diagram is an important tool for predicting the constitution

of austenitic Cr-Ni steel welds with carbon contents up to 0.12%. However,

it does not allow determination of the composition and volume

• of the carbide phase.

• This Schaeffler diagram is especially suited to weld metals in order to

predict the structure.

 Schaeffler diagram

Page 3: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Schaeffler and Delong diagrams are used to predict structure on the basis of alloying elements. (Stainless Steel Weld) Plots the compositional limits at room temperature of austenite, ferrite and martensite, in terms of nickel and chromium equivalents The Cr and Ni equivalent can be empirically determined as:

Cr equivalent = (Cr) + 2(Si) + 1.5(Mo) + 5(V) + 5.5(Al) + 1.75(Nb) + 1.5(Ti) + 0.75(W)

Ni equivalent = (Ni) + (Co) + 0.5(Mn) + 0.3(Cu) + 25(N) + 30(C)

Page 4: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

4

Chrome and nickel are among the most important alloying elements here. All ferrite formers have a chromium equivalent and all austenite formers a nickel equivalent.

Page 5: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

 Schaeffler diagram

Page 6: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

 Modified Schaeffler diagram

Delong modified the schaeffler diagram Ferrite No.(FN) is also plotted on schaeffler diagramWidely use in predicting phase-structure in weld metal Also include calculation of volume and composition of carbide phase

Page 7: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

 Modified Schaeffler diagram FN can be roughly determine by:

FN = 3.34 Creq – 2.46 Nieq – 28.6

--> FN between 3-7 (max.) is preferredSolidification mode of S.S. during casting or welding can be predicted roughly as under:

Creq/Nieq < 1.5 (Austenitic)

Creq/Nieq > 2.0 (Ferritic)

In b/w 1.5 and 2.0 is the mixed structure

Page 8: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

8

Page 9: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

 Schaeffler-Delong diagram

FN = Ferrite No.

Low %ferrite leads to solidification cracking in weld metal, but low %ferrite render/reduce Stainless steel more corrosion resistant

Page 10: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

 Schaeffler-Delong diagram

Page 11: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

M3 Concept

Page 12: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

12

• The performance of steel products is closely related to the constitutes and morphology of microstructures.

• The characterization and effective control of microstructure are now from micron scale to nano scale steadily (to be in nano order).

• The properties have been raised from the order of 106 to 109 unit (to be in Giga order).

Future Perspective of Steels

Page 13: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Future Perspective

TensileStrength

FatigueStrength

Fatiguecycles

Creep strength

Improved from MPa to GPa order

Improved from MPa to GPa order

Improved from Mega cyles to Gega

Cycles

Improved from Mega secs to

Giga secs

Page 14: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Third Generation Steels

Toughness ≥ 200 J

Ductility ‘A’ ≥ 20 %

Y.S. ≥ 800-1000 MPa

Target Values

Mass production on existing mills !

Page 15: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

M3 Concept

Fig. – The performance of steels are associated with the microstructure, characterized by Multi-phase, Meta-stability and Multi-scale

Page 16: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

M3 Concept

Multi-phase

Meta-stability

Multi-scale

Mixture ofBainite,

Martensite,Retained austenite

Stability of austeniteStrain-induced

Martensite (SIM)

UFG, Ultra Fine GrainNano-laths martensite

Nano-Bainite

Page 17: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

M3 ConceptSchematic of Research Targets and Future Directions

Third generation AHSS with improvednductility and reduced cost. Third generation martensitic steels for improved creep strength.

Page 18: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

18

Quenching & Partitioning Heat Treatments

Page 19: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Quenching & PartitioningA Novel method, proposed by G. Speer, for the development of multiphase

steels with considerable retention of austenite in the microstructure.

The Q&P process consists of a first quench (quenching step) to a

temperature below the Ms but above the Mf to form a mixture of martensite

and austenite.

Subsequent isothermal treatment (partitioning step) at the same

temperature (one-step treatment) or at a higher temperature (two step

treatment), in order to transfer the C from the supersaturated αM into the γ.

Final structure = Decarburized (carbon depleted) martensite + C enriched

austenite + Fresh martensite.

Page 20: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Quenching & Partitioning

Fig. – Schematic representation of One and Two step Q&P process

Page 21: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Quenching & PartitioningIn addition to carbon partitioning into austenite,other processes that could occur during the ‘‘partitioning’’ step are:

Tempering of Martensite Carbon trapping at dislocations and interfaces in the martensite Formation of carbides (both transition carbides and/or cementite) Decomposition of the austenite to bainite or other transformation

productsCompetition occurs b/w theses processes.*Bainite has been recognized as a potential constituent particularly at increased quench temperatures where the amount of martensite is limited and bainite transformation kinetics are more rapid than at a lower temperature.

Page 22: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Quenching & Partitioning

Fresh martensite is formed after quenching from partitioning temperature to

room temperature, b/c of unstable austenite.

This microstructure can lead to an interesting combination of mechanical

properties.

Good formability, as a result of the TRIP effect from the retained austenite,

and a strength higher than that of conventional TRIP steels due to martensite.

Page 23: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Q&P – Design Requirements

(a) Absence of ferrite and/or pearlite formation during the quenching step.

(b) Retardation or inhibition of bainite formation, in order to minimize possible overlapping of carbon partitioning and formation of bainite.

(c) Retardation or minimization of the precipitation of carbides, which consumes carbon that is then no longer available for carbon enrichment of the austenite.

(d) A sufficiently high carbon content for thermal stabilization of a considerable fraction of retained austenite at room temperature.

Page 24: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Q&P Steel - MicrostructuresFig. - Light optical micrograph of Q&P microstructure in AISI 9260 steel quenched to 190°C and partitioned at 400°C. Nital etch; retained austenite appears white.

Fig. – SEM micrograph showing blocky austenite within the martensite matrix formed during Q&P heat treatment.

Page 25: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Q&P Steel - Microstructures

Fig. - Field emission scanning electron micrographs of medium carbon low alloy steel samples quenched at 180 ◦C, partitioned at 300 ◦C for (a) 30 s (b) 120 s and (c) 900 s respectively.

Page 26: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Q&P Steels - Properties

Fig. - Comparison of impact toughness at room temperature between Q&P and Q&T at various partitioning (or tempering) temperatures.

Page 27: Heat Treatment: Lecture Q&P, M3 concept

Q&P Steels - Properties

Fig. - Comparison of the engineering stress-strain curves and strain hardening of Q&P and Q&T