health management project
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
1/56
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
2/56
2
Chief Investigator
Prof. Deoki NandanDirector
National Institute of Health and Family Welfare
Study Team
Patna Medical College
Prof. Rashmi Singh
Dr. Madhumita Mukherjee
National Institute of Health and Family Welfare
Dr.U.Datta
Mrs. Reeta Dhingra
Dr. V.K Tiwari
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
3/56
3
CONTENTS
Preface
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
List of Tables
List of Figures
Executive summary
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Methodology
Chapter 3 Finding and Discussion
Chapter 4 Recommendations
Limitations of the Study
Future Directions of Research
References
Annexure
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
4/56
4
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
5/56
5
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
6/56
6
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
7/56
7
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
8/56
8
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
9/56
9
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
10/56
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
11/56
11
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
12/56
12
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
13/56
13
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
14/56
14
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
15/56
15
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
16/56
16
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
17/56
17
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
18/56
18
0
20
40
60
80
10 0
12 0
Phulw
arisha
Maner
Fatuha
Bakh
tiyar
p
Dhana
ru
Bihta
Mokam
Punp
u
Palig
an
Masau
rh
Nauba
tpu
Bikram
Pand
ara
Daniyaw
a
Barh
Danap
u
N
o.ofC
lie
P HCA m busers
Tota lU s e r
0
20
40
60
80100
120
140
160
180
July Augus t September October
Totalser
vice
0
1
2
34
5
6
7
Servicesto
ruralPH
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
19/56
19
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
20/56
20
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
21/56
21
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
22/56
22
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
23/56
23
Time response of availability of transport
53%
22%
12%
13%
Instantaneous
< 15 min
< 30 min
> 30 min
0
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
N
o.of
us
2 5
m in
3 0
m in
4 5
m in
1 5
m in
5 0
m in
6 0
m in
1 6 5
m in
78%
15%
3%3% 1%
PHC to
PMCH/NMCH
PHC to pvt.
Pvt. to pvt. Ns
home
PHC to 1st ref
Pvt. to 1st ref.
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
24/56
24
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
25/56
25
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
26/56
26
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
27/56
27
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
28/56
28
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
29/56
29
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
30/56
30
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
31/56
31
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
32/56
32
Discussion
Non-awareness about the availability of the ambulance services is the main cause of non-
utilization. In the Tamil Nadu Health Systems Development Project -II, financial support was
given to districts for creating awareness about emergency ambulance services4. In the same way,
there is a need to create public awareness about the PHC ambulance services in Bihar, for whichfunds should be made available to the District Health Societies. The s ervices of Dial an
ambulance 102 lack popularity due to the incompatibility of the telephone connection with theconnection of other companies. It can receive only a call made from BSNL, while most of the
telephone connection available at the periphery are Reliance or Airtel. Most of the clients to
whom ambulance was not made available complained of nonresponse by the telephone receiverof 102 services as well health staff at the PHCs. A few complained that they could not get the
services because contact person at PHC was not available. Favouritism was also raised as cause
of nonavailability in two of the FGDs. The rate of utilization of transport was far from
satisfactory. Number of ambulances in each PHC as well as drivers was less than requirednumber. One ambulance per PHC does not fulfil the population norm (Range of Population 1.3
to 3.8 lacs). As per the report of Hospital Review Committee (K. N. Rao Committee 1968) 3 to 6ambulances are required per PHC5. While the post of one driver is sanctioned per PHC , in some
PHCs the drivers were recruited on contra ct basis, at a nominal monthly remuneration of
Rs.2000/- per month. In some PHCs, they were working on daily wage of Rs. 100 per referral.
Two PHCs had no driver appointed at the time of study. Lack of life saving equipments alsomakes the PHC transport system unattractive to the clients. The time response as maintained by
the control room of 102 ambulance services shows a grim picture. The mechanism of 102
services is that it uses the respective PHC transport (depending on availability) only after
informing the medical officer in charge of PHC or the Health Managers. As a result, aconsiderable delay is involved in getting a transport during emergency, and thus making the
system unpopular. The system was following an arbitrary cost structure. BPL clients af raid of
availing the services as they may be asked to pay higher charges. Monitoring and redressesmechanism is miserably lacking in PHCs as well as DHS. The pitiful breakdown of the
ambulance in the mid journey also makes the clients scared of using the ambulance services.
It can be recommended here that appropriate and effective strategy for public awarenesscampaign need to be adopted depending upon the target clients. Dial an ambulance 102 should
be made compatible to respond to all the mobile connect ion instead of BSNL alone. Number of
ambulances per PHC should be increased depending on the population coverage. At least 3
drivers are needed to work on shift basis (leave reserve) in a PHC. Ambulances outsourcedlocally or donated must be well equipped with life support mechanism. Referral transport
charges should be standardized and made transparent to all inclusive of dial an ambulance 102
services. APL and BPL distinction should be strictly followed and evidence to categorizepopulation as BPL should be standardized. Standard feedback format containing cause of
referral, place of referral, time response, cost incurred , output of referral and similar important
features of the referrals should be made available at PHCs.
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
33/56
33
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
34/56
34
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
35/56
35
1. Government of India. NRHM Newsletter, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New
Delhi, Vol. NO. 2; 2005.
2. Government of India. National Rural Health Mission Document, Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare. New Delhi; 2005.
3. Government of Bihar, Guidelines on Referral Transport System, Directorate of Health
Services. Patna; 2006.
4. Government of Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu Health Systems Project Phase II,
Establishment of Emergency Ambulance Services, Department of Health and Family
Welfare G.O (4D) No. 3 Dated 12.4.2007.
5. Quoted in Indira Gandhi National Open University. PGDHHM, Module -5, Unit 2.
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
36/56
36
Annexure 1
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
37/56
37
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
38/56
38
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
39/56
39
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
40/56
40
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
41/56
41
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
42/56
42
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
43/56
43
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
44/56
44
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
45/56
45
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
46/56
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
47/56
47
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
48/56
48
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
49/56
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
50/56
50
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
51/56
51
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
52/56
52
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
53/56
53
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
54/56
54
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
55/56
55
-
8/10/2019 Health management project
56/56