hdr sustainable ratings

4
Sustainable Rating Systems Overview Sustainable Rating Systems benefit project owners, stakeholders and the community. These systems offer valuable tools for project assessment, planning and design, even for those who do not wish to formally certify their projects. Rating system tools focus attention on project goals and means and methods, while providing a framework for project teams to define “sustainability” and link their project’s solutions to the context of sustainability. There are many rating systems around the world — some general to buildings or infrastructure; some specific to highways or healthcare projects. All can be beneficial, but it is important to have a thorough understanding of where and when each system is applicable. Benefits to using sustainability rating systems include: ° Enhances the design process ° Provides economic benefits ° Reduces risk ° Adds a competitive advantage ° Increases accountability ° Improves quality of life ° Offers recognition This overview illustrates some of the predominant rating systems around the world, which HDR is asked about most frequently. It does not include all rating systems or all countries that use them.

Upload: hdr-inc

Post on 01-Apr-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

This overview illustrates some of the predominant rating systems around the world, which HDR is asked about most frequently. It does not include all rating systems or all countries that use them.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HDR Sustainable Ratings

Sustainable Rating Systems

Overview

Sustainable Rating Systems benefit project owners, stakeholders and the community. These systems offer valuable tools for project assessment, planning and design, even for those who do not wish to formally certify their projects. Rating system tools focus attention on project goals and means and methods, while providing a framework for project teams to define “sustainability” and link their project’s solutions to the context of sustainability.

There are many rating systems around the world — some general to buildings or infrastructure; some specific to highways or healthcare projects. All can be beneficial, but it is important to have a thorough understanding of where and when each system is applicable.

Benefits to using sustainability rating systems include: ° Enhances the design process ° Provides economic benefits ° Reduces risk ° Adds a competitive advantage ° Increases accountability ° Improves quality of life ° Offers recognition

This overview illustrates some of the predominant rating systems around the world, which HDR is asked about most frequently. It does not include all rating systems or all countries that use them.

Page 2: HDR Sustainable Ratings

Sustainable Rating Systems High-Level Comparison

B R E E A M E NVISIO N™ ESTIDAMA PEARL G R E E N G LO B E S G R E E N STAR I NVE ST LE E D® SUSTAINABLE SITES™ Managing body Building Research Establishment

(BRE) bre.co.uk

Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI) sustainableinfrastructure.org

Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council upc.gov.ae/?lang=en-US

U.S.: Green Building Initiative (GBI) thegbi.org

Canada: BOMA Canada rebranded BOMA BESt bomacanada.com/

Green Building Council Australia gbca.org.au

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sustainablehighways.org

US Green Building Council (USGBC) usgbc.org

American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center at The University of Texas at Austin and the United States Botanic Garden www.sustainablesites.org

Established 1990 2012 2010 2000 2003 2012 1998 2006

Geography International Intended for US & Canada; worldwide interest

United Arab Emirates Specifically tailored to the hot climate and arid environment of Abu Dhabi

United States and Canada Australia United States International United States

Intended for Communities, new buildings, new homes, existing buildings, renovation

Any type of infrastructure, buildings that are primarily process focused

New buildings, communities, villas, temporary villas

New buildings, existing buildings New buildings

Piloting for communities, existing buildings and interiors

Highways & Transportation New buildings, major renovations, existing buildings, interiors, neighboorhoods, homes

Development projects located on sites with or without buildings, including: open spaces, streetscapes and plazas, commercial, residential, educational/institutional, military, infrastructure, government, industrial

Applicable Project Phase(s) Planning: Communities

Design and construction: New buildings, new homes

Operations and maintenance: Existing buildings

Remodeling: Refurbishment

Planning and design: All infrastructure and process-focused buildings

Construction and Operations: Rating systems in development

Design and construction Design and construction: New buildings

Operations and maintenance: Existing buildings

Design and construction: New buildings, communities, interiors

Performance: Existing buildings

System planning

Project development

Operations & maintenance

Design and construction: New buildings, major renovation, land development (neighborhoods), interior fit-outs, single- to mid-rise housing

Operations and maintenance: Existing buildings

Planning

Design

Construction and maintenance

Categories/Credits • Management• Health & Well Being• Energy• Transport• Materials• Waste• Water• Land Use & Ecology• Pollution• Innovation

• Quality of Life• Leadership• Resource Allocation• Natural World • Climate and Risk

• Integrated Development• Natural Systems• Livable Buildings/Villas/

Communities• Precious Water• Resourceful Energy• Stewarding Materials• Innovating Practice

• Project Management• Site• Energy• Water• Materials & Resources• Emissions and Other Impacts• Indoor Environment

• Management• Indoor Environmental Quality• Energy• Transport• Water• Materials• Land Use• Emissions

Criteria based on phase/module:

System Planning 16 criteria, including integrated planning, air quality and infrastructure resiliency

Project Development 29 criteria, including economic analysis, site vegetation and freight mobility

Operations & Maintenance 14 criteria, including recycle and reuse, safety management and bridge management

• Location & Transportation• Sustainable Sites• Water Efficiency• Energy & Atmosphere• Materials & Resources• Indoor Environmental Quality• Innovation• Regional Priority

• Site Context• Pre-Design Assessment

and Planning• Site Design—Water, Soil and

Vegetation, Materials Selection, Human Health & Well-Being

• Construction• Operations and Maintenance• Education and

Performance Monitoring

Registration Cost Varies; depending on scheme and if in the UK or international (New building in UK around $200 + VAT)

$1,000 Varies $1,000 Assessment Fee varies based on project size and GBCA membership

$0 (Self-assessment) $1,200 ($900 if USGBC member) SITES v2 Reference Guide released in June 2014

Certification Cost Varies; negotiated with Assessor Based on project cost Fee levels have not yet been set Based on building square footage Based on building square meter $0 (Self-assessment) Based on building square footage TBD

Rating Scale Pass, Good, Very Good, Excellent, Outstanding

Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum 1 to 5 Pearls 1 to 4 Green Globes 4, 5 or 6 Stars Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum [in each module]

Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum v2: Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum Pilot Projects: 1 to 4 Stars

Our Project Experience Easter Bush Research Consortium, The Roslin Institute Building at the University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK

William Jack Hernandez Sport Fish Hatchery, Anchorage, AK, USA

Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Arizona State University and the City of Phoenix, Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and KAET-TV, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Investa Property Group, Coca-Cola Place, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Minnesota Department of Transportation, Sustainable Highway Evaluation, Statewide, Minnesota, USA

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA, USA

Historic Fourth Ward Park, Atlanta, GA, USA

Page 3: HDR Sustainable Ratings

This overview illustrates some of the predominant rating systems around the world, which HDR is asked about most frequently. It does not include all rating systems or all countries that use them.

hdrinc.com

B R E E A M E NVISIO N™ ESTIDAMA PEARL G R E E N G LO B E S G R E E N STAR I NVE ST LE E D® SUSTAINABLE SITES™ Managing body Building Research Establishment

(BRE) bre.co.uk

Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI) sustainableinfrastructure.org

Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council upc.gov.ae/?lang=en-US

U.S.: Green Building Initiative (GBI) thegbi.org

Canada: BOMA Canada rebranded BOMA BESt bomacanada.com/

Green Building Council Australia gbca.org.au

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sustainablehighways.org

US Green Building Council (USGBC) usgbc.org

American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center at The University of Texas at Austin and the United States Botanic Garden www.sustainablesites.org

Established 1990 2012 2010 2000 2003 2012 1998 2006

Geography International Intended for US & Canada; worldwide interest

United Arab Emirates Specifically tailored to the hot climate and arid environment of Abu Dhabi

United States and Canada Australia United States International United States

Intended for Communities, new buildings, new homes, existing buildings, renovation

Any type of infrastructure, buildings that are primarily process focused

New buildings, communities, villas, temporary villas

New buildings, existing buildings New buildings

Piloting for communities, existing buildings and interiors

Highways & Transportation New buildings, major renovations, existing buildings, interiors, neighboorhoods, homes

Development projects located on sites with or without buildings, including: open spaces, streetscapes and plazas, commercial, residential, educational/institutional, military, infrastructure, government, industrial

Applicable Project Phase(s) Planning: Communities

Design and construction: New buildings, new homes

Operations and maintenance: Existing buildings

Remodeling: Refurbishment

Planning and design: All infrastructure and process-focused buildings

Construction and Operations: Rating systems in development

Design and construction Design and construction: New buildings

Operations and maintenance: Existing buildings

Design and construction: New buildings, communities, interiors

Performance: Existing buildings

System planning

Project development

Operations & maintenance

Design and construction: New buildings, major renovation, land development (neighborhoods), interior fit-outs, single- to mid-rise housing

Operations and maintenance: Existing buildings

Planning

Design

Construction and maintenance

Categories/Credits • Management• Health & Well Being• Energy• Transport• Materials• Waste• Water• Land Use & Ecology• Pollution• Innovation

• Quality of Life• Leadership• Resource Allocation• Natural World • Climate and Risk

• Integrated Development• Natural Systems• Livable Buildings/Villas/

Communities• Precious Water• Resourceful Energy• Stewarding Materials• Innovating Practice

• Project Management• Site• Energy• Water• Materials & Resources• Emissions and Other Impacts• Indoor Environment

• Management• Indoor Environmental Quality• Energy• Transport• Water• Materials• Land Use• Emissions

Criteria based on phase/module:

System Planning 16 criteria, including integrated planning, air quality and infrastructure resiliency

Project Development 29 criteria, including economic analysis, site vegetation and freight mobility

Operations & Maintenance 14 criteria, including recycle and reuse, safety management and bridge management

• Location & Transportation• Sustainable Sites• Water Efficiency• Energy & Atmosphere• Materials & Resources• Indoor Environmental Quality• Innovation• Regional Priority

• Site Context• Pre-Design Assessment

and Planning• Site Design—Water, Soil and

Vegetation, Materials Selection, Human Health & Well-Being

• Construction• Operations and Maintenance• Education and

Performance Monitoring

Registration Cost Varies; depending on scheme and if in the UK or international (New building in UK around $200 + VAT)

$1,000 Varies $1,000 Assessment Fee varies based on project size and GBCA membership

$0 (Self-assessment) $1,200 ($900 if USGBC member) SITES v2 Reference Guide released in June 2014

Certification Cost Varies; negotiated with Assessor Based on project cost Fee levels have not yet been set Based on building square footage Based on building square meter $0 (Self-assessment) Based on building square footage TBD

Rating Scale Pass, Good, Very Good, Excellent, Outstanding

Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum 1 to 5 Pearls 1 to 4 Green Globes 4, 5 or 6 Stars Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum [in each module]

Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum v2: Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum Pilot Projects: 1 to 4 Stars

Our Project Experience Easter Bush Research Consortium, The Roslin Institute Building at the University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK

William Jack Hernandez Sport Fish Hatchery, Anchorage, AK, USA

Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Arizona State University and the City of Phoenix, Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and KAET-TV, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Investa Property Group, Coca-Cola Place, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Minnesota Department of Transportation, Sustainable Highway Evaluation, Statewide, Minnesota, USA

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA, USA

Historic Fourth Ward Park, Atlanta, GA, USA

Page 4: HDR Sustainable Ratings

Global Coverage of SustainabilityRatings

B U I LDI N GS INFR ASTRUCTURE COM M U N IT Yoffice, healthcare, educational, commercial, retail, science & technology

roads, bridges, pipelines, railways, airports, dams, levees, landfills, water treatment systems

neighborhood development, urban revitalization projects

Africa LEED

South Africa Green Star SA, LEED

Asia LEED

China China 3 Star, GBAS, LEED

Hong Kong HK BEAM Plus HK BEAM Plus- Infrastructure, CEEQUAL International

HK BEAM - District Tool

India LEED India, GRIHA IGBC Green Townships

Japan CASBEE

Australia/New Zealand Green Star, NABERS Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Green Star Communities

Europe BREAAM, LEED CEEQUAL BREEAM for Communities

France HQE CEEQUAL International

Germany DGNB CEEQUAL International

United Kingdom BREEAM CEEQUAL BREEAM for Communities

North America LEED Envision™

Canada LEED, BOMA BESt, BREEAM Canada Envision™ LEED for Neighborhood Development

United States LEED, Living Building Challenge, ENERGY STAR®, Green Globes

Envision™, INVEST, BE2ST In-Highways, Greenroads™, GreenLITES

LEED for Neighborhood Development, Sustainable Sites, STAR Communities

South America LEED

Middle East LEED CEEQUAL International

Abu Dhabi Estidama - Pearl Building Rating System CEEQUAL International Estidama - Community Rating System

United Arab Emirates LEED, Green Key CEEQUAL International