hasil analisis

7
Lampiran : HASIL PENGOLAHAN DAN ANALISIS DATA Frequencies Statistics Penyul uhan Umur Pendi dikan Peker jaan Pari tas Sumber _infor masi Pret es Post es N Vali d 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Miss ing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Frequency Table Penyuluhan Frequenc y Percen t Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Vali d Baik 42 84.0 84.0 84.0 Kurang 8 16.0 16.0 100.0 Total 50 100.0 100.0

Upload: aripamin

Post on 27-Jan-2016

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Kain dril, kan&as dan kain dril yang berat, sebaliknya, terlalu rapat untuk ditembus uap (tidak dapatdisterilkan), sangat sukar dicuci dan makan 3aktu untuk dikeringkan.kalau dipakai kain,3arnanya harus putih atau terang agar kotorandan kontaminasi dapat terlihat

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HASIL ANALISIS

Lampiran :

HASIL PENGOLAHAN DAN ANALISIS DATA

Frequencies

Statistics

Penyuluhan Umur

Pendidikan

Pekerjaan Paritas

Sumber_informasi Pretes Postes

N Valid 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

Missing

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table

Penyuluhan

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Baik 42 84.0 84.0 84.0

Kurang 8 16.0 16.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Umur

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid < 20 tahun 16 32.0 32.0 32.0

20 -35 tahun 24 48.0 48.0 80.0

> 35 tahun 10 20.0 20.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Page 2: HASIL ANALISIS

Pendidikan

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Dasar (Sd/Smp) 17 34.0 34.0 34.0

menengah (sma) 28 56.0 56.0 90.0

Tinggi (Pt) 5 10.0 10.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Bekerja 20 40.0 40.0 40.0

Tidak bekerja 30 60.0 60.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Paritas

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Primigravida 13 26.0 26.0 26.0

Multigravida 22 44.0 44.0 70.0

Grandemultigravida 15 30.0 30.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Sumber_informasi

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Langsung 20 40.0 40.0 40.0

Tidak Langsung 30 60.0 60.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Page 3: HASIL ANALISIS

Pretes

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Cukup 26 52.0 52.0 52.0

Kurang 24 48.0 48.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Postes

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Baik 11 22.0 22.0 22.0

Cukup 34 68.0 68.0 90.0

Kurang 5 10.0 10.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

Statistics

Skor_Pretes Skor_postes

N Valid 50 50

Missing 0 0

Mean 11.0200 13.8800

Median 11.0000 14.0000

Mode 13.00 12.00

Std. Deviation 2.20843 2.05675

Minimum 8.00 10.00

Maximum 14.00 17.00

Page 4: HASIL ANALISIS

Explore

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Skor_Pretes 50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Skor_postes 50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Skor_Pretes .215 50 .124 .869 50 .136

Skor_postes .126 50 .147 .940 50 .114

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Skor_Pretes-Skor_Postes

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

4.469 1 98 .015

T-Test

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. DeviationStd. Error

Mean

Pair 1 Postes 13.880 50 .55842 .07897

Pretes 11.020 50 .50467 .07137

Page 5: HASIL ANALISIS

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

Pair 1 Postes & Pretes 50 .571 .000

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

T dfSig. (2-tailed)Mean

Std. Deviatio

n

Std. Error Mean

95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Lower Upper

Pair 1

Postes - Pretes

2.860 .49487 .06999 .74064 .45936 8.573 49 .000