handouts - immucor, inc. program handouts/lsa... · 2018-02-13 · michael d. gautreaux, ph.d.,...
TRANSCRIPT
2/13/2018
1
Continuing Education Webinar Series
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
22 February Donor Selection of Solid Organ Transplant: Is Virtual Xmatch better than real?
28 February Proficiency, Competency, and QC: A practical approach to CLIArequirements and AABB, CAP, and Joint Commission Expectations
22 March Clinical Significance of HLA Antibodies in Solid Organ Transplantations
Future Webinars
Link to register: https://immucor.webinato.com/register
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
Handouts
http://www.immucor.com/en‐us/Pages/Educational‐Program‐Handouts.aspx
2/13/2018
2
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
Continuing Education
• ABHI, PACE, Florida and California DHS
• 1.0 Contact Hours
• Each attendee must register to receive CE at:https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HLAImmucor
• Registration deadline is March 2, 2018
• Certificates will be sent via email only to those who have registered by March 16, 2018
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
Presentation Recording
• Session will be recorded and posted. – Access information will be sent to each
registrant when the recording becomes available
• CE credits will be issued to anyone who listens to the recording within one year of the original presentation date (today).
Learn website: learn.immucor.com
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
Questions?
• You are all muted
• Type in questions
2/13/2018
3
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
• Course content is for information and illustration purposes only. Immucor makes no representation or warranties about the accuracy or reliability of the information presented, and this information is not to be used for clinical or maintenance evaluations.
• The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the presenter and do not necessarily reflect those of Immucor.
Testing for HLA Antibodies:We’re Not the Chemistry Lab
Michael D. Gautreaux, Ph.D., D.ABHI
Impact of HLA Ab in Transplantation
•Pre- and peri-transplant– Access to transplantation– Short-term survival (hyperacute, accelerated)
•Post-transplant– Survival
» Acute and chronic rejection– Marker for rejection response
2/13/2018
4
PRA
• Panel Reactive Antibody• Percent Reactive Antibody
• Intended to be an assessment of transplantability.
• 20% PRA means that a recipient should crossmatch positive with 20% of donors
• DO NOT CONFUSE WITH TITER
Basis of Antibody Testing
+Y Y
Y
Y
Y
Patient’s serumCells or beads
Reaction No reaction
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
PRA Techniques
•Complement-dependent cytotoxicity•(original gold standard; usually augmented)
•Flow cytometry•(mostly solid phase)
•Solid Phase•(ELISA & Luminex)
2/13/2018
5
Complement-dependent Cytotoxicity
+
30 min
Add complement
60 min
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cell death
Y
Magnetic separation HLA antibody in wellsPBLs
ASHI Scoring System
1(0-10%)
2(11-20%)
4(21-50%)
6(51-80%)
8(81-100%)
Determination of Significance
+ -
+a
TP+/+
bFP-/+
-c
FN+/-
dTN-/-
Correlation Coefficient (r)r = a*d - b*c
SQRT (A*B*C*D)
Chi square (2)2 = r 2 * T
Serumreactivity
Antigen
A = a + b
B = c + d
C = a + c D = b + d
T = Total #p value depends on degrees of freedom2 x 2 tables have 1 degree of freedom
2 2.7055 3.8415 6.6349 7.8794p 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005
2/13/2018
6
+ -
+ 14 3
- 1 21
A2
Serumreactions
r = a*d - b*cSQRT (A*B*C*D)
r = 14*21 - 3*1SQRT (17*22*15*24)
r = 0.793
2 = 0.7932 * 39
2 = 24.52
p < 0.0001
2 = r 2 * T
Luminex - xMAP
Luminex’s xMAP Technology combines fluidics, optics, and digital signal processing with proprietary microsphere technology to deliver multiplexed assay capabilities that are configured to perform a wide variety of bioassays quickly, cost-effectively and accurately.
Bead Array
• Microspheres are dyed to create 100 distinct colors
• Each microsphere has ‘spectral address’ based on red/infrared content
2/13/2018
7
• Analyzer samples well• Lasers excite fluorescent dyes
– red laser for bead classification and green laser for assay result
• Multiple readings for each microsphere set
• Software reports results in real-time
• Up to 9600 results in 1 hour
xMAP Technology
_ Analysis Software
HLA Antibody Testing by Luminex
Does the MFI of anti-A2 affect the sCr? AM MFI is 2,500 but PM is 3,000What is your cut-off MFI?Well, that MFI is too low to matter.MFISTOP!!!!!!!MFIMFI
2/13/2018
8
Single Antigen PRA Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2Antigen
Time 1
Time 2
Time 3
Time 4
Single Antigen PRA Results
Assay Classification
Class ResultStandardization
Method
References,Calibrators,
Controls
Qualitative Positive or Negative Single or dual 1 reference sample,positive and negative controls
Semi-quantitative Arbitrary units Single or dual Negative and bi-level positive controls; References unique for test system made from pooled patient sera
Quantitative Units related to recognized reference preparation
Multipoint standardcurve
Tri-level controls; Reference calibrated towards a qualified reference preparation
2/13/2018
9
SABs are not quantitative – why?
• Quantitative assay = result in units/volume
• Don’t have the necessary components
• Not standardized– Challenging from biologic and technical perspectives
• So says regulatory authorities – (intended use)
This ain’t the Chemistry LabChallenges for Immunoassay Standardization
• Measuring analyte • serum with multiple isotypes, subclasses and varying avidities
• No standard• Sample handling/Interfering substances• Antigen standardization• Suitable controls with defined range of Ab
Factors affecting all assays
•Affinity vs Avidity•Polyclonal vs monoclonal•Inhibitors•Accuracy vs Precision•Birthday cake!!
Yeah, you still gotta worry about all that biology, chemistry and physics stuff.
2/13/2018
10
Affinity vs Avidity
Polyclonal vs Monoclonal
Roitt IM, Brostoff JB, Male DK. Immunology – Fifth Edition. Mosby Internation Ltd. 1998.
Inhibitors
2/13/2018
11
Accuracy vs Precision
• Accuracy– The ability to measure purified amounts of a substance– Known positive sera as a control– Mixed mono-specific serum with non-specific serum
• Precision– Ability of an assay to consistently reproduce a result – Measured by Coefficient of Variation (%CV)– Good intra-assay CV ≤ 10%– Good inter-assay CV ~ 10-15%
Intra-assay %CV
Inter-assay %CV
2/13/2018
12
The Real World
• SOPs are routinely deviated– Lunch– Birthday cake!
• Ambient conditions change
• Lasers fade
Effect of Temperature on Variability
Room temperature 0C
Temperature Control
Negative Control Bead
Courtesy: Derek O’Neill, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
A*0201(donor Specific)
B*3701 B*1503
Temp 0C
Rxn Score
MFI Rxn Score
MFI Rxn Score
MFI
Day of transplant serum
cold 4 707 2 186 6 2077
Day 7 post-transplant serum Run 1
cold 4 1162 6 2077 6 3000
Day 7 post-transplant serum Run 2
warm 1 21 2 159 4 1032
Patient serum variability: Post-transplant monitoring
Courtesy: Derek O’Neill, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
2/13/2018
13
Luminex Summary
• Luminex assays should be carried out under controlled conditions
• Luminex results should be interpreted by experienced personnel
– take measurement error into account.
• SAB assays are at best semi-quantitative.
• Resist the siren call of MFI
Other PRA Testing Considerations
• Polyclonal vs. monoclonal
• CYNAP
• Monospecific vs. polyspecific
• Cross Reactive Groups (CREGS)
Antibody Specificity
•Monospecific– serum that has specificity for a single HLA antigen
•Polyspecific– serum that reacts with more than one distinct HLA antigen
2/13/2018
14
Cross-reactive epitope groups (CREGs)
• Multiply reactive sera can result from:
– multiple “private” specificity antibodies» antibodies specific for one specific determinant
– “true crossreactive” antibodies» one antibody that bind to structurally similar private
epitopes
– antibodies to “public” epitopes» one antibody that binds to a unique epitope shared
among several different HLA antigens (Bw4 or Bw6)
2/13/2018
15
CREG Epitope Locations
B7 CREG appears safe
30-86-48
02000400060008000
1000012000140001600018000200002200024000
CO
N1
CO
N2
CO
N3
CO
N4
A*0
101
A*0
201
A*0
203
A*0
206
A*0
301
A*1
101
A*1
102
A*2
302
A*2
402
A*2
403
A*2
501
A*2
601
A*2
902
A*3
001
A*3
101
A*3
201
A*3
301
A*3
303
A*3
402
A*3
601
A*4
301
A*6
601
A*6
602
A*6
801
A*6
802
A*6
901
A*7
401
A*7
405
A*8
001
B*0
702
B*0
703
B*0
801
B*1
302
B*1
401(
B6
4)B
*140
2(B
65)
B*1
501(
B6
2)B
*150
2(B
75)
B*1
503(
B7
2)B
*151
2(B
76)
B*1
513(
B7
7)B
*151
6(B
63)
B*1
518(
B7
1)B
*18
01B
*27
03B
*27
05B
*27
08B
*35
01B
*37
01B
*38
01B
*39
01B
*400
1(B
60)
B*4
002(
B6
1)B
*41
01B
*42
01B
*44
02B
*45
01B
*46
01B
*47
01B
*48
01B
*49
01B
*50
01B
*51
01B
*52
01B
*53
01B
*54
01B
*55
01B
*56
01B
*57
01B
*58
02B
*73
01B
*78
01B
*81
01B
*82
02C
w*0
102
Cw
*021
0C
w*0
303
Cw
*030
4C
w*0
401
Cw
*040
3C
w*0
501
Cw
*060
2C
w*0
701
Cw
*070
2C
w*0
704
Cw
*080
1C
w*0
802
Cw
*120
2C
w*1
402
Cw
*150
2C
w*1
601
Cw
*170
1C
w*1
801
Pro
be 7
7
Raw
MF
I-B
G
Pt. PRA consistently >90% (multispecific)
Pt. HLA-A11, -; B56, 65 (? sensitization)
B Ag specificities narrowed
45-30-96
02000400060008000
1000012000140001600018000200002200024000
CO
N1
CO
N2
CO
N3
CO
N4
A*0
101
A*0
201
A*0
203
A*0
206
A*0
301
A*1
101
A*1
102
A*2
302
A*2
402
A*2
403
A*2
501
A*2
601
A*2
902
A*3
001
A*3
101
A*3
201
A*3
301
A*3
303
A*3
402
A*3
601
A*4
301
A*6
601
A*6
602
A*6
801
A*6
802
A*6
901
A*7
401
A*7
405
A*8
001
B*0
702
B*0
703
B*0
801
B*1
302
B*1
401(
B64
)B
*140
2(B
65)
B*1
501(
B62
)B
*150
2(B
75)
B*1
503(
B72
)B
*151
2(B
76)
B*1
513(
B77
)B
*151
6(B
63)
B*1
518(
B71
)B
*180
1B
*270
3B
*270
5B
*270
8B
*350
1B
*370
1B
*380
1B
*390
1B
*400
1(B
60)
B*4
002(
B61
)B
*410
1B
*420
1B
*440
2B
*450
1B
*460
1B
*470
1B
*480
1B
*490
1B
*500
1B
*510
1B
*520
1B
*530
1B
*540
1B
*550
1B
*560
1B
*570
1B
*580
2B
*730
1B
*780
1B
*810
1B
*820
2C
w*0
102
Cw
*021
0C
w*0
303
Cw
*030
4C
w*0
401
Cw
*040
3C
w*0
501
Cw
*060
2C
w*0
701
Cw
*070
2C
w*0
704
Cw
*080
1C
w*0
802
Cw
*120
2C
w*1
402
Cw
*150
2C
w*1
601
Cw
*170
1C
w*1
801
Pro
be 7
7
Raw
MF
I-B
G
Pt tx with B44 mismatch
6/2005 66% (A68, B44)4/2006 100% (B44 strongest)
B specificities B44, 45, 76, 82
2/13/2018
16
Class II – DQ Abs pop out
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
2000022000
CO
N1
CO
N2
CO
N3
DP
B1*
0101
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
0101
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
0101
/DP
A*0
202
DP
B1*
0101
/DP
A*0
301
DP
B1*
0201
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
0301
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
0301
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
0401
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
0401
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
0401
/DP
A*0
202
DP
B1*
0401
/DP
A*0
301
DP
B1*
0402
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
0402
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
0402
/DP
A*0
301
DP
B1*
0501
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
0501
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
0501
/DP
A*0
202
DP
B1*
0501
/DP
A*0
301
DP
B1*
1301
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
1301
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
1401
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
1401
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
1701
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
1801
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
1801
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
1901
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
1901
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
1901
/DP
A*0
301
DP
B1*
2801
/DP
A*0
103
DP
B1*
2801
/DP
A*0
201
DP
B1*
2801
/DP
A*0
202
DQ
B1*
0202
/DQ
A*0
302
DQ
B1*
0202
/DQ
A*0
201
DQ
B1*
0402
/DQ
A*0
302
DQ
B1*
0402
/DQ
A*0
401
DQ
B1*
0401
/DQ
A*0
401
DQ
B1*
0301
/DQ
A*0
302
DQ
B1*
0301
/DQ
A*0
501
DQ
B1*
0302
/DQ
A*0
302
DQ
B1*
0302
/DQ
A*0
201
DQ
B1*
0303
/DQ
A*0
302
DQ
B1*
0303
/DQ
A*0
401
DQ
B1*
0501
/DQ
A*0
104
DQ
B1*
0601
/DQ
A*0
104
DR
B1*
0101
DR
B1*
0103
DR
B1*
0401
DR
B1*
0701
DR
B1*
0801
DR
B1*
0901
DR
B1*
1001
DR
B1*
1101
DR
B1*
1201
DR
B1*
1301
DR
B1*
1401
DR
B1*
1501
DR
B1*
1601
DR
B1*
0301
(17
) D
RB
1*03
03 (
18)
DR
B3*
0101
(52
) D
RB
3*02
02 (
52)
DR
B4*
0101
(53
) D
RB
5*01
01 (
51)
Pt. always called DR 52 (previous MM)
DQ specificity confounded by DR 52 and 53
CREG Epitope Locations
HLA-A Cross Reactivities
2/13/2018
17
HLA-B Cross Reactivities
HLA-DR Cross Reactivities
TABLE 1. Overview of common molecular targets for non-HLA antibody responses, allograft types with confirmedinjury phenotypes and corresponding time frames, as well as experimental evidence for pathogenicity of non-HLAantibodies with corresponding references
Antibody target Human allograft type Time-frame Experimental evidence
MICA Kidney (28–31, 35–39), heart (33), Hyperacute, acute, chronic —pancreas (31)
Vimentin Heart (52) Chronic Mouse (57), non-human primate
(55, 56)
AT1R Kidney (46) Acute Rat renal allograft (46)
ICAM-1 Heart (58) ? —
HLA, human leukocyte antigens; AT1R, angiotensin type 1 receptor; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1.
2/13/2018
18
MICA and MICB
MICA
MHC class I-like chain A or B
It is thought that MICA and MICB function as stress-induced antigens that are broadly recognized by NK cells and most of the subtypes of T cells.
Expressed on endothelial cells, gut epithelium, monocytes but not lymphocytes
Routine crossmatch will not detect Ab to MICA or MICB
Antibodies to MICA don’t generally fix complement
Up-regulation of MICB assoc with class II MHC expression and lymphocyte infiltration
MICB
Antibody target Human allograft type Time-frame Experimental evidenceMICA Kidney (28–31, 35–39), heart (33), Hyperacute, acute, chronic -
pancreas (31)
Vimentin
Vimentin is a member of the intermediate filament family, and is part of the cytoskeletal network.
Non-polymorphic protein found in abundance in endothelium and smooth muscle cells.
antibodies to vimentin are considered “auto-reactive”
In a monkey model, anti-vimentin antibodies are associated with chronic cardiac rejection but not kidney rejection. ????
Antibody target Human allograft type Time-frame Experimental evidenceVimentin Heart (52) Chronic Mouse (57), non-human primate (55, 56)
Angiotensin type 1 Receptor (AT1R)
• AT1 receptor has vasopressor effects and regulates aldosterone secretion. It is an important effector controlling blood pressure and volume in the cardiovascular system.
• Antibodies to AT1R have been associated with pre-eclampsia and are implicated with severe vascular rejection.
• Article describes a patient who received a 6 Ag match kidney and then had a sudden onset of malignant hypertension that mimicked the pre-eclampsia she suffered >20 years before.
Angiotensin type II
Antibody target Human allograft type Time-frame Experimental evidenceAT1R Kidney (46) Acute Rat renal allograft (46)
A receptor like AT1R
2/13/2018
19
ICAM and anti-GBM
• Antibodies to ICAM found in cardiac transplant patients.
• Antibodies to agrin and perlecan are associated with duplication of the GBM -a hallmark of transplant glomerulopathy.
Mechanisms of Injury
• Complement-mediated injury
• Antibody-dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity– for non-C’ fixing Abs (like those against MICA/B)
• May contribute to structural changes
• Signalling?
Perspective
• With exceptions of MICA and AT1R, routine testing for these antibodies are not currently available.
• Question as to whether non-HLA antibody related pathologies represent “true” rejections of the transplanted organ or organ-specific autoimmune phenomena.
• Non-HLA Abs may find application as biomarkers of immune response and herald the need for more suitable immunosuppression.
2/13/2018
20
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
Questions?
• You are all muted
• Type in questions
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
We like you!
Like us on social media!
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
Questions?
• You are all muted
• Type in questions
2/13/2018
21
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
Continuing Education
• ABHI, PACE, Florida and California DHS
• 1.0 Contact Hours
• Each attendee must register to receive CE at:https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HLAImmucor
• Registration deadline is March 2, 2018
• Certificates will be sent via email only to those who have registered by March 16, 2018
All Content © 2015 Immucor, Inc.
22 February Donor Selection of Solid Organ Transplant: Is Virtual Xmatch better than real?
28 February Proficiency, Competency, and QC: A practical approach to CLIArequirements and AABB, CAP, and Joint Commission Expectations
22 March Clinical Significance of HLA Antibodies in Solid Organ Transplantations
Future Webinars
Link to register: https://immucor.webinato.com/register