green buildings, organizational success, and occupant productivity (heerwagen, 2000)

Ramiro Aznar Ballarin

November 2009

University of Reading

GREEN BUILDINGS, ORGANIZATIONAL SUCCESS,

AND OCCUPANT PRODUCTIVITY (Heerwagen, 2000)

INDEX

I. Introduction

II. Green Buildings and LEED


November 2009



AND OCCUPANT PRODUCTIVITY

III. Objectives

IV. Green Buildings and Productivity, Well Being and Strategic Performance

V. Examples

VI. Conclusions

VII. Bibliography


November 2009




I. Introduction

Sustanaible Development & Climate Change Mitigation

Landscape Management & Biodiversity Conservation

Urban Sustainability

Green Buildings

IIa. Green Building

Green Building is the practice of creating structures and using process that are

environmentally responsible and resource-efficient throughout a building’s life-

cycle from siting to design, construction, operation, maintenance, renovation and


November 2009




deconstruction.

IIa. Green Building


November 2009




+

+

Comfort

+

+

-

-

-

HealthEnvironment

James & James, 1999

IIb. LEED

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is an internationally

recognized green building certification system, providing third-party

verification that a building or community was designed and built using


November 2009




strategies aimed at improving performance across all the metrics that matter

most: energy savings, water efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction, improved

indoor environmental quality, and stewardship of resources and sensitivity to

their impacts.

II. Objectives


November 2009




Sustanaible Design Strategic Performance

Human Resource

Development

IVa. Green Buildings and Productivity


November 2009




• Thermal Environment (temperature, humidity level & ventilation)

• Air quality

• Lighting

IVa. Green Buildings and Productivity


November 2009




Seppanen & Fisk 2006

IVa. Green Buildings and Well Being


November 2009




• Air quality

• Lighting

• Windows and views

• Building acoustics

IVa. Green Buildings and Well Being


November 2009




Seppanen & Fisk 2006 Lan et al 2009

IVc. Green Buildings and Strategic Performance


November 2009




• Turnover and Retention

• Absenteeism

• Organizational Image

• Organizatinal Level Productivity

• Cost Savings

• Marketing and Sales

• Costs of Indoor Air Quality Illnesses from a Insurance Perspective

V. Examples

i. Comcast Center (Philadelphia, US)

ii. Plaza at PPL Center (Allentown, US)


November 2009




iii. One Crescent Plaza (Philadelphia, US)

i iii


November 2009




ii

Va. Conclusions


November 2009




i. Green Buildings are relevant to business interests across the full

spectrum of concerns, from portfolio issues to enhanced quality of

individual workspaces.

ii. Research on Green Buildings should address a range of outcomes

(workforce attraction and retention, quality of work life, work output,

and customer relationship).

iii. Green Buildings can provide both cost reduction benefits and value

added benefits.


November 2009




Green Building Features and

Productivity

Reference

Vb. Conclusions: structure

Productivity

Thermal and air quality factors Leaman (1999), Preller et al (1990),

Raw (1998a)

Comfort Brager & deDear (1998), Wyon (1996),

Diamond (1992), Melnechuck (1988)

Lighting Hedge et al (1995), Veitch & Newsham

(1999a)

Etc. Etc.


November 2009




Vb. Conclusions: content (I)

The Ecological Niche as

a n-dimensional hypervolumen

G.E. Hutchinson

Hutchinson, 1957


November 2009




Vb. Conclusions: content (II)

Independent

Variales (xi)

Dependent

Variales (yi)

Temperature (x ) Productivity (y )

y1 = a + b1x1 + b2x2 + … + bnxn

Temperature (x1)

Humidity (x2)

Ventilation (x3)

Comfort (x4)

Lighting (x5)

Window views (x6)

Daylight (x7)

Air quality (x8)

Acoustics (x9)

…

Comfort (xn)

Productivity (y1)

Well Being (y2)

Strategic

Performance (y3)

bi: regression coefficients

Green Buildings


November 2009




V. References• Heerwagen, 2000. Green Buildings, Organizational Success, and Occupant Productivity. Building Research and Information

28(5): 353-367. (Scientific article)

• Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding Remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22 (2): 415–427.

• James & James, 1999. A GREEN VITRUVIUS. Principles and practice of sustanaible architectural design. ACE, ERG, SAFA &


November 2009




• James & James, 1999. A GREEN VITRUVIUS. Principles and practice of sustanaible architectural design. ACE, ERG, SAFA &

SOFTECH, London. 152 pp.

• Lan, L., Lian Z., Pan L., & Ye, Q. 2009. Neurobehavioral approach for evaluation of office workers’ productivity: The effects of

room temperature. Building and Environment 44: 1578–1588.

• Seppanen, O. A., & Fisk, W. J. 2006. Some Quantitative Relations between Indoor Environmental Quality and Work

Performance or Health. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Retrieved from:

http://escholarship.org/uc/item/80v061jx [01/11/09]

• Environmental Protection Agency (US): www.epa.gov/greenbuilding/ [01/11/09]

• US Green Building Council: www.usgbc.org [01/11/09]

• Philadelphia Business Journal: http://philadelphia.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/ [01/11/09]

• Denis Du Bois, 2007. The Business Case for Green Office Buildings. Energy Priorities Magazine: http://energypriorities.com/

[01/11/09] (Lay article)


November 2009




THANK YOU

green buildings, organizational success, and occupant productivity (heerwagen, 2000)

Documents