grain boundary saturation and grain growth
TRANSCRIPT
www.actamat-journals.com
Scripta Materialia 51 (2004) 521–525
Grain boundary saturation and grain growth
Feng Liu *, Reiner Kirchheim
Institute fur Materialphysik, Universitat Gottingen, Tammannstr. 1, 37077 Gottingen, Germany
Received 2 August 2003; received in revised form 24 March 2004; accepted 25 May 2004
Available online 17 June 2004
Abstract
In nanoscale alloys with strong segregation tendency, the grain size at metastable thermodynamic equilibrium is determined by
the grain boundary energy, the enthalpy change of grain boundary segregation, and the solute excess of an equivalent grain bound-
ary monolayer at saturation. Good agreement between experiment and thermodynamic description has been found with respect to
the temperature-dependence of the metastable grain size.
� 2004 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Grain boundary energy; Grain boundary segregation; Grain growth
1. Introduction and theoretical background
A particularly interesting type of nanocrystalline
(NC) materials is characterised by a strong tendency
for grain boundary (GB) segregation, i.e. for an enrich-
ment of the solutes at the GBs [1–3,8–15]. On this basis,
two strategies have been devised to improve the thermalstability of NC material: a kinetic one, in which the GB
mobility m [1–4] is reduced, and a thermodynamical one,
in which the driving force, i.e. GB energy, rb, is sup-
pressed [6–14]. Standard metallurgical techniques for
realizing the kinetic approach typically involve the intro-
duction of impurity atoms or phases to pin the GBs, the
effectiveness of which has been demonstrated experi-
mentally for NC materials [1–3]. However, due to theArrhenius dependence of m on temperature, even a dras-
tic reduction in the GB mobility will eventually be over-
come at high temperature, and grain growth restarts
1359-6462/$ - see front matter � 2004 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by El
doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.042
* Corresponding author. Present address: Max-Planck-Institute for
Metals Research, Heisenbergstr. 3, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany. Tel.:
+49-711-6893325/551-395002; fax: +49-711-6893312/551-395012.
E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (F. Liu).
accordingly. Potentially more effective would be a reduc-
tion in rb, which exhibits only weak temperature
dependence [5].
According to the Gibbs adsorption theorem, rb can
be reduced by the addition of solutes that segregate to
the GBs [6,7]. Experiments have shown that the result-
ing effect on rb can be substantial [13,14], and theoreti-cal considerations predict that a reduction of rb to zero
is possible in alloy system with a high enthalpy of segre-
gation [8–12].
rb ¼ r0 � Cb0½RT lnX 0 þ DH seg� ð1Þ
where r0 is the GB energy for the pure solvent, X0 the
bulk concentration, DHseg the enthalpy change of GB
segregation per mole solute, R the gas constant, T theannealing temperature, and Cb0 the solute excess of an
equivalent saturated GB monolayer, available for segre-
gation. Normally, the number for the superficial atomic
density in the equivalent segregation monolayer (in units
of mol/m2) is adopted to describe the saturation cover-
age. If possible, it would be more informative to indi-
cate, in addition, the density in units of fraction of a
monolayer or of fraction of the saturation coverage.Unfortunately, data for these quantities are not availa-
ble.
sevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fig. 1. Fitting of Eq. (4) to the experimental data points [15] at
different annealing temperatures, corresponding to GBs saturation
with half an equivalent monolayer of Ca. The values of the fitting
parameters: r0, Cb0 and DHseg, and the error of the fit are given in
Table 1.
522 F. Liu, R. Kirchheim / Scripta Materialia 51 (2004) 521–525
The Gibbs free energy of a polycrystal can be written
as [11]
G ¼X
lini þ rbA ð2Þ
where li represents the chemical potential of component
i, ni the amount of component i, and A the GB area. At
constant pressure, temperature and amount of material
the change in free energy can be written as [11],
dG ¼ rb dA ð3Þ
Consequently, whenever the GB energy is positive, grain
growth will decrease the free energy of the system, and
grain growth can only be suppressed is for rb=0. In
reality, precipitation of solutes or stable phases at GBs
results in substantial grain growth, a more stable equi-
librium. A stop of nanoscale grain growth in metastableNC system corresponds to saturated GBs with zero GB
energy. The grain diameter at GB saturation, D, is given
as [12],
D ¼ 3Cb0V M
X total � expr0�Cb0DH seg
Cb0RT
� � ð4Þ
with Xtotal as the summation of the bulk and the GB
concentrations, and VM the molar volume of the alloy.Apparently an increase of Xtotal will result in a reduction
of D, whereas an increase of T causes an increase in D.
For alloy systems with high DHseg and negligible solute
solubility, Eq. (4) can be approximated as,
D ¼ 3Cb0V M
X total
ð5Þ
Considering the temperature dependence of the metast-
able grain size, a simple relation was obtained [11],
dð1=DÞd ln T
¼ �X 0 lnX 0
3Cb0V M
ð6Þ
The right-hand side of Eq. (6) depends also on temper-
ature: changes in D result in changes in X0, i.e. the con-
figurational interfacial excess entropy. However, the
interfacial excess entropy plays a negligible role for thetemperature dependence of the metastable grain size
[11]. Some simple calculations (not shown here) prove
that the agreement with experimental data will not be af-
fected if the configurational (ideal) interfacial excess
entropy is taken into account. Therefore, Eq. (6),
neglecting the influence of a change of X0, turns out to
be useful for comparison with experimental results.
In the present paper, published data on grain growthin poly- andNC solid solutions [13–16] has been analyzed
in terms of a model for stabilization of the grain size
through GB segregation, i.e. Eqs. (1)–(6). A good agree-
ment between theory and experiment has been achieved.
2. Grain diameter at GB saturation
2.1. Grain boundary segregation in TiO2–Ca system
A systematic and quantitative study of size-depend-
ent segregation behaviour in the TiO2–Ca system wasconducted [15]. Highly dense, fine-grained TiO2 doped
with 0.34 mol.% Ca has been synthesized, and the Ca
coverage at GBs (which could be assumed to be equal
to the GB excess, Cb0) has been measured as a function
of grain size, in the range of 50–750 nm, using a STEM
micro-analytical technique. Ca segregates strongly to
GBs, and this segregation exhibits a clear size-depend-
ence below critical size 150–350 nm [15]. Above the crit-ical range the GBs become saturated at approximately
half of an equivalent monolayer of Ca [15]. Upon fur-
ther annealing (e.g. corresponding to 500 nm grain size),
a few CaTiO3 precipitates are observed, and then sub-
stantial grain coarsening takes place [15].
Applying Eq. (6), the critical grain size of TiO2, cor-
responding to GBs saturated with half of an equivalent
monolayer of Ca [15], could be approximately chosen as150, 200, and 350 nm, at 773, 1173, and 1323 K, respec-
tively. Fig. 1 presents the fits of Eq. (4) to these critical
values at GB saturation. Values for the fitting parame-
ters and the error of fit have been gathered in Table 1.
With reference to [17], the GB energy of TiO2 (e.g. 30–
200 nm) was found to be 0.5–1 J/m2, in the temperature
range of 873–1053 K, which corresponds to the value of
0.61 J/m2, obtained by fitting. The fitted values for Cb0and DHseg are almost equal to data given in [15]. The
GB coverage (@0.84·10�5 mol/m2) given in [15], corre-
sponding to half of an equivalent monolayer of Ca, is
Table 1
The values of the fitting parameters: r0, Cb0 and DHseg, and the error of the fitting of Eq. (4) to experimental data of the grain diameter at GB
saturation [15]
r0 (J/m2) DHseg (kJ/mol) Number of monolayer Cb0 (mol/m2) Error (%)
0.61 1.23 0.5 0.87·10�5 0.14
Table 2
GB excess of TiO2 at normal GBs at the beginning of annealing, for
three TiO2 contents and three annealing temperatures, respectively [16]
Solute content Cb0/1583 K Cb0/1603 K Cb0/1623 K
0.1 1.33·10�5 1.49·10�5
0.2 1.87·10�5 1.91·10�5 2.28·10�5
0.4 3.63·10�5 3.71·10�5 16.3·10�5
Fig. 2. Fitting of Eq. (4) to the grain sizes obtained in the single-phase
NC solid solutions of Pd100�xZrx upon annealing [13,14]. The values of
the fitting parameters: r0, Cb0 and DHseg, and the error of the fit are
given in Table 2.
F. Liu, R. Kirchheim / Scripta Materialia 51 (2004) 521–525 523
equal to Cb0; DHseg is close to a value of 1.1 eV, which
has been estimated for the elastic strain energy of the
cation size misfit of Ca in TiO2 [15].
2.2. Abnormal grain growth in BaTiO3 doped with excess
TiO2
Normal and abnormal grain growth are two differenttypes of grain growth. In normal growth the grain size
distribution remains uniform whereas in abnormal
growth a few grains grow at the expense of the fine ma-
trix grains which are often pinned. The abnormal grain
growth of BaTiO3 containing an excess of 0.1, 0.2, and
0.4 mol% of TiO2 has been studied [16]. It has been
found that the matrix grain size depends on TiO2 excess
but does not change with annealing temperature or time.The experimental data [16] strongly suggests that the
excess TiO2 in BaTiO3 causes the stop of normal grain
growth, but it is not obvious by which mechanism
TiO2 acts. Since the solubility of TiO2 in BaTiO3 is very
limited, one possibility could be that TiO2 forms a fine
precipitate dispersion within the matrix. In order to
check this possibility selected samples were thoroughly
examined in TEM [16], however, no evidence could befound of such a precipitate dispersion. The excess
TiO2 could be associated with the GBs. According to
the present thermodynamic treatment (see Eqs. (1)–
(6)), it is proposed that grain growth is suppressed due
to GB saturation.
Since BaTiO3 exhibits cubic crystal structure above
400 K [18], TiO2 excess could be assumed to be segre-
gated at (110) and (111) faces of the BaTiO3 cubic crys-tal (a=0.4018 nm), and the GB excess for one equivalent
monolayer is approximated as,
Cb0 ¼Cð110Þ þ Cð111Þ
2ð7Þ
with C(110) and C(111) as the GB excess of one equiv-
alent monolayer for different crystal faces. Cb0 could be
calculated from
Cð110Þ ¼ 2ffiffiffi2
pða2Þ
¼ 8:76 1018=m2;
Cð111Þ ¼ 2
ðsinð60Þ=2Þð2a2Þ ¼ 1:43 1019=m2 ð8Þ
as 1.153·1019/m2, or 1.91·10�5 mol/m2.
At the beginning of the annealing, the volume fraction
of the abnormal grain is relatively small [16], so all of the
TiO2 excess may be segregated to GBs of the normal
grain. The values for TiO2 excess at normal GBs have
been gathered in Table 2. Except for solute content of
0.1 mol% TiO2, the TiO2 excess is larger than the satura-
tion value for one equivalent monolayer (see below Eq.
(8)). The abnormal grains grow upon annealing, andconsume GBs. Therefore the TiO2 excess associated with
GBs has to be redistributed. Part of this TiO2 could be
collected by the advancing abnormal GBs, and the
remaining TiO2 could be shared by other unconsumed
normal GBs. Since the volume fraction of the abnormal
grains is substantially increased as abnormal grain
growth proceeds [16], the TiO2 excess at the normal
GBs will probably be increased. Therefore, the stop ofthe normal grain growth can be due to GB saturation.
Table 3
The values of the fitting parameters: r0, Cb0 and DHseg, and the error of the fitting of Eq. (4) to experimental data of the grain diameter at GB
saturation obtained in the single-phase NC solid solutions of Pd100�xZrx upon annealing [13,14]
Solute content r0 (J/m2) DHseg (kJ/mol) Cb0 (mol/m2) Error (%)
Pd90Zr10 0.7 55.9 2.07·10�5 2
Pd85Zr15 0.7 42.5 3.77·10�5 16
Pd80Zr20 (673–1400 K) 0.7 59.2 1.78·10�5 6
Pd80Zr20 (1073–1400 K) 0.7 59.2 1.78·10�5 3
524 F. Liu, R. Kirchheim / Scripta Materialia 51 (2004) 521–525
2.3. Grain growth in Pd–Zr solid solution
Using the ball milling technique, single-phase NC
solid solutions of Pd100�xZrx containing up to 20 at.%
Zr have been prepared and subsequently annealing in-duces segregation of Zr atoms to the GBs [13,14]. Fig.
2 shows the fit of Eq. (4) to grain sizes of the single-
phase NC solid solutions of Pd100�xZrx upon annealing
for 24 h at different temperatures. Values of the fitting
parameters and the error of fit have been gathered in
Table 3. Obviously, Eq. (4) provides much better fit for
Pd80Zr20 and Pd90Zr10 data than that for Pd85Zr15 data
(see Fig. 2). With reference to [13,14], values for the fit-ting parameters obtained for Pd80Zr20 and Pd90Zr10 data
are reasonable, but not for Pd85Zr15 data. The reason is
not clear. The slightly higher error obtained for Pd80Zr20data within 673–1400 K (cf. Table 3) implies that GBs
have not been saturated after 24 h annealing at temper-
atures within 673–1073 K. Significant grain growth in
Pd80Zr20 solid solution has not been initiated until
1173 K (see Fig. 2).GB excess was calculated and shown to increase from
0.2 to 2.1 mol/m2 with increasing annealing temperature
from 671 to 1400 K, and GB energy essentially vanishes
Fig. 3. Linear relation between 1/D and ln T according to Eq. (6) using
experimental data upon 24 h annealing within 1073–1400 K Pd80Zr20and Pd90Zr10 single-phase NC solid solution [13,14].
in the samples manifesting the greatest degree of Zr seg-
regation (T=1400 K) [14]. Good fits of Pd80Zr20 and
Pd90Zr10 data, however, indicate that grain growth stops
by reducing the GB energy to zero, independent of the
annealing temperature. Fig. 3 presents a linear relationof 1/D as a function of ln T according to Eq. (6) for data
with 10 and 20 at.% Zr (within 1173–1400 K). This fur-
ther provides evidence that rb has been reduced to zero
after 24 h annealing at the respective temperatures.
3. Conclusion
Applying a thermodynamic relation to published
experimental data, grain growth suppression is re-inter-
preted. The grain size at metastable thermodynamic
equilibrium is determined by the grain boundary energy,
the enthalpy change of grain boundary segregation, and
the solute excess of an equivalent grain boundary mono-
layer at saturation. It is confirmed that agreement be-
tween experiment and thermodynamic description wasfound with respect to the temperature-dependence of
the metastable grain size.
Acknowledgment
This research is supported by the Alexander von
Humboldt Foundation.
References
[1] Terwilliger CD, Chiang YM. Nanostruct Mater 1994;4:651.
[2] Bayden KJ, Ying JY. Acta Mater 1996;44:3847.
[3] Liu KW, Mucklich F. Acta Mater 2001;49:395.
[4] Hillert M. Acta Metall 1965;13:227.
[5] Murr LE. Interface phenomena in metals and alloys. Reading,
MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975. p. 130.
[6] Gibbs JW, Trans Conn Acad, vol. III; 1876. p. 108–248; 1878. p.
343–524, Also in: The collected works of J.W. Gibbs, vol. 1. New
York: Longmans, Green and Co.; 1928. p. 55–354.
[7] Cahn JW. In: Johnson WC, Blakely JM, editors. Surface
segregation in metals and alloys. Metals Park: ASM; 1979.
[8] Weissmuller J. Nanostruct Mater 1993;3:261.
[9] Weissmuller J, Krauss W, Haubold T, Birringer R, Gleiter H.
Nanostruct Mater 1992;1:439.
[10] Krill CE, Bringger R. Mater Sci Forum 1996;225:263.
F. Liu, R. Kirchheim / Scripta Materialia 51 (2004) 521–525 525
[11] Kirchheim R. Acta Mater 2002;50:413.
[12] Liu F, Kirchheim R. J Cryst Growth 2004;264:392.
[13] Ehrhardt H. PhD theis. Universitat des Saarlandes, 1998.
[14] Krill CE, Birringer R. In: Gottstein G, Molodov AD, editors.
Recrystallization and grain growth, vol. 1. Berlin: Springer-
Verlag; 2001. p. 205–8.
[15] Terwilliger CD, Chiang YM. Acta Metal 1995;43:319.
[16] Rios PR, Yamamoto T, Kondo T, Sakuma T. Acta Mater
1998;45:1617.
[17] Yan MF, Rhodes WW. In: Pask JA, Evans AG, editors. Ceramic
Microstructures� 86: role of interfaces. New York: Plenum Press;
1987. p. 519.
[18] Chien AT, Xu X, Kim JH, Sachleben J, Speck JS, Lange FF. J
Mater Res 1999;14:3330.