grade sheet – 600.145 hw #2

8
Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2 Name 1: __________________ Email/Phone: ______________ Role/contribution: ___________ __________________________ Name 2: __________________ Email/Phone: ______________ Role/contribution: ___________ __________________________ I/we have adhered to the rules on this homework assignment: ___________________________ ___________________________ (signature) (date) (signature) (date) Problem 1 30 Problem 2 5 Problem 3 5 Problem 4 20 Problem 5 20 Problem 6 30 Totals 110

Upload: chelsea-burns

Post on 30-Dec-2015

29 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Name 1: __________________ Email/Phone: ______________ Role/contribution: ___________ __________________________. Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2. Name 2: __________________ Email/Phone: ______________ Role/contribution: ___________ __________________________. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2Name 1: __________________Email/Phone: ______________Role/contribution: ___________ __________________________

Name 2: __________________Email/Phone: ______________

Role/contribution: ___________ __________________________

I/we have adhered to the rules on this homework assignment:

___________________________ ___________________________

(signature) (date) (signature) (date)

Problem 1 30

Problem 2 5

Problem 3 5

Problem 4 20

Problem 5 20

Problem 6 30

Totals 110

Page 2: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Homework groundrules

• Work in groups of at most 2 people• Do not work with other groups on homework • Do not refer to previous years’ homework• Include the cover sheet on the homework• Both students should sign the honor pledge • You should state what each of you did

• NOTE: Although this is called a homework assignment, it is effectively a take home exam. I do not hesitate to let the Ethics Board investigate cases where I have reason to believe that students have broken my trust.

Page 3: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Computer-Assisted Craniofacial Osteotomies

Consider the problem of navigation-assisted craniofacial surgery, as discussed in class. In this case, assume that the desired facial transformation is from an existing skull shown on the left to the elongated version shown on the right. Further, the surgeon will use the optical tracking system discussed in class

Desired change

Page 4: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Computer-Assisted Craniofacial Osteotomies

Further, suppose that the surgeon eventually wants to perform this procedure by means of a four segment osteotomy, illustrated below

SkullF

AF BF

CF

SkullF

AfF BfF

CfF

Desired change

Page 5: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Computer-Assisted Craniofacial OsteotomiesFurther, we will suppose that the procedure is being planned in CT coordinates and that the planning system will eventually associate the following coordinate systems with the four bone fragments, all expressed as transformations with respect to CT image coordinates:

Skull

A

Af

F preoperative pose of skull base wrt CT coordinates

= desired preoperative position of skull base wrt CT coordinates

F = preoperative pose of fragment "A" wrt CT coordinates

F = desired postopera

B

Bf

tive pose of fragment "A" wrt CT coordinates

F = preoperative pose of fragment "B" wrt CT coordinates

F = ....SkullF

AF BF

CF

SkullF

AfF BfF

CfF

Desired change

Page 6: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Computer-Assisted Craniofacial Osteotomies

1. (30 points) Develop a “surgical CAD/CAM” information flow diagram similar to the diagrams shown in class for this application. The diagrams and accompanying description should identify the major system components, identify what each component does, what information is needed as input, what information is provided as output and to which components this information is provided and why it is needed.

2. (5 points) Provide an expression for computing the relationship between the skull base and bone fragment A before the osteotomy is perfomed. I.e., give an expression for computing FSA such that FA=FSkull ●FSA

3. (5 points) If the rotation and translation parts of FA are [RA,pA], etc. Give expressions for determining the rotation and translation components of FBf with respect to FAf.

Page 7: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Computer-Assisted Craniofacial Osteotomies4. (20 points) Identify the key coordinate systems associated with the

application (e.g., CT image coordinates, planned initial bone fragment positions, planned final bone fragment positions, navigational tracker makers, navigational tracker device, actual bone fragment positions at different times). Draw diagrams illustrating the relationship between these different coordinates at the following times: during planning, during registration, and after the bone fragments have been placed in their final positions. Hint: The introductory material has part of the answer, in so far as the planning system is concerned.

5. (20 points) In the work discussed in class we used matching point anatomical landmarks (specifically, points on the patient’s teeth) to perform the registration between CT plans and reality. Two other alternatives would be implanted fiducials such as the pins of Robodoc or a point-to-surface based method such as used in “pinless” Robodoc.– Discuss in a few short sentences advantages and disadvantages of these

methods relative to each other. – To whom are these factors important & why?– Where & when (on the skull) would you collect points for a point-to-surface

method? – Of the pinless methods discussed in class, which would you select & why?

Page 8: Grade Sheet – 600.145 HW #2

Computer-Assisted Craniofacial Osteotomies

6. (30 points) The method used in class used an Optotrak navigational tracker with active markers. Within the context of the craniofacial surgery application, discuss the relative strengths and drawbacks of at least two non-optical tracking technologies with respect to each other and with respect to optical marker-based tracker methods.