gpteng_full doc-getting people thinking

Upload: jason-hill

Post on 04-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    1/26

    TEARFUND CASE STUDIES

    Getting

    people thinkingIDEAS FROM CHRISTIAN OUTREACHS

    ABCD PROGRAMME, CAMBODIA

    To increase peoples ability to

    initiate change and make choices inan environment of loving relationships

    The ABCD

    Programme

    goal

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    2/26

    2

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    3/26

    3

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Contents1 Thinking creatively: what holds us back? 5

    2 How can we encourage people to think? 7

    2.1 Trust and self-confidence 7

    2.2 The work of animators 9

    3 Wearing hats to help you think! 13

    4 The obstacle to growth: how can we deal with selfishness? 15

    5 What are the keys to a programmes success? 17

    5.1 Getting priorities right 17

    5.2 Flexibility and clarity 19

    5.3 The logical framework 20

    6 Why is thinking creatively so important? 23

    APPENDIX: Impact indicators 25

    Glossary 26

    Author Sheila Melotbased on the case study by Dr Simon Batchelor:

    Transforming the mind by wearing hats!

    Illustrations Rod Mill, Sancton Drawing Services

    Quotations All quotations are from Meas Nee, a Khmer community development worker.

    Copyright Tearfunds learning materials and case studies may be adapted and reproduced for use

    provided the materials are distributed free of charge. Full reference should be given to

    Tearfund and the relevant authors within the materials.

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    4/26

    4

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    5/26

    5

    Thinking creatively:

    what holds us back?

    When the ABCD programme started in 1992 in Prey Veng, Cambodia, its aim

    was to transform peoples ways of thinking. Based in three communes in a rural

    area, it worked among 22,000 people. There were many clear needs, such as an

    inadequate water supply and health problems. But nothing was being done to

    try to tackle these problems: people felt unable to take initiatives. Enduring bad

    situations patiently was seen as the only way to respond.

    Why was this? Four reasons were found.

    A generation earlier, the Khmer Rouge had killed all intellectuals and anyone who

    stood out from the crowd. The education system had broken down, and nobody

    dared express themselves for fear of being killed.

    My memories of that time are of feeling numb, just trying to stay alive, never

    to think. Not even to think when people were taken from the road and killed

    right where I was. I couldnt help so I didnt think.

    Every institution of society had to be restarted but the people were still passivein the beginning. I felt no dignity at all. There was a habit of not being able to

    decide anything. The first step out from numbness was to beg for help but there

    was no dignity in doing that.

    All sense of personal dignity was lost, and this became even worse in the refugee

    camps where people fled.

    In the Thai border camp I felt as if I was living under the edge of the roof of

    someone elses house. I would feel shame in speaking the Cambodian language.This loss of dignity is strong and deep. It is a loss of identity and of value and of

    power. It is a feeling of being more like a pig than a person. Anyone with

    authority could say, I want to beat this man.

    Then when they returned to the villages under the new political regime, little was

    done to heal these deep wounds.

    THE LOSS OF

    PERSONAL

    DIGNITY

    POLITICAL

    TERROR

    1

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Underlined wordsare explained in the

    Glossary on page 26

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    6/26

    6

    The village is like a basket that has been broken and the pieces scattered. What

    has been broken can be rewoven slowly and gradually, but only by those who

    take time to stay close to the village people and build up trust with them. I

    know that this can be achieved, but it must be done slowly and gradually.Eventually the village people become the weavers themselves and they carry the

    task forward further, furtheryou cannot easily change the damage caused by

    the war, or caused by the breaking of relationships, or the loss of dignity.

    Very often tradition is extremely important for rural life: planting what ones

    forefathers have planted, and keeping to well-known ways. It is also more common

    for rural communities to react to change than to set out to change something

    themselves.

    In Cambodia the rural peoples religion was mainly Buddhist, but they also believed

    that the spirits of the dead had power in their lives. They thought that these spirits

    could be provoked by anyone standing out from the crowd. So for example nobody

    would draw attention to a baby, saying how beautiful he was, in case the spirits

    noticed and punished him.

    How does your community react to change? Is there pleasure? excitement? fear?Or perhaps mixed feelings?

    Do you try to change things yourselves? What examples of this can you remember

    from the past year?

    Do you have traditions that help you adapt to today s world?

    Are there aspects of those traditions that hold you back from speaking out or

    questioning?

    Questions fordiscussion

    RELIGIOUS FEAR

    TRADITION

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Thinking creatively:what holds us back?1

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    7/26

    7

    How can we encourage

    people to think?

    2.1 TRUST AND SELF CONFIDENCE

    Christian Outreach saw that they would need to encourage relationships of trust

    to be built up again between the people, before anything else could happen. A

    new sense of dignity and self-confidence needed to be found.

    A major step in this process was to convince the people that they themselves would

    take the decisions. No expertfrom outside would make a plan which had to be

    followed. So in any particular village, the programme animator would start by

    calling the community together. At this meeting, people were encouraged to decide

    to work together on a small project to improve the quality of life for the poor, and

    in particular, widows. It was made clear that the only limit on their decision would

    be financial: only a certain amount of money was available. This could often be put

    to best use as a revolving loan. Within those financial limits, the choices were theirs.

    If this first step failed, it was still seen as a step forward because it provided a first

    discussion point which could lead to more critical thinking.

    At this first meeting, everyone who attended together chose five people to form a

    committee, which would meet and discuss with the programme staff. They

    discussed all aspects of life with the animator: the aim being to establish trust and

    friendship, and to explore ideas. All meetings were open to the public, so the

    committee remained accountable to their community. The animator also took time

    to walk round the village, talking to everyone they met.

    2

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    A new senseof dignity andself-confidenceneeded to be

    found

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    8/26

    8

    So began a process of discussing, questioning, deciding to act and then discussing

    the consequent actions. As a result of this method, the ABCD programme led to:

    over 2,000 treadle pumps being installed

    drilling teams making their living finding water manufacturers making pumps

    hundreds of vegetable gardens being started

    new crop experiments being carried out

    over 100 buffalo being distributed

    several family spacing clinics being set up, staffed by volunteers

    trees being planted

    action on domestic violence being taken

    appropriate technology such as solar dryers being used.

    But the main purpose of the programme was the transformation of the peoples

    ability to think: to analyse, find solutions and create new ideas, and then to manage

    the resulting changes.

    Is everyone encouraged to participate in discussion in your community?

    Men, women and children? Disabled people, those from different ethnic groups

    or castes?

    Does any group of people find it hard to join in? How could they be encouraged

    further?

    Are committee meetings open to the public?

    Does an expertor an outsiderprovide the plan, or do you agree together what it

    should be?

    Questions for

    discussion

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    How can we encouragepeople to think?2

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    9/26

    How can we encouragepeople to think?2

    2.2 THE WORK OF ANIMATORS

    Animators are key people for encouraging others to think.

    In the ABCD project, animators were programme staff either local or people from

    District Government. Their job was to help the local people to feel enthusiastic

    about the programme.

    Animatorswork is a skill, which can be helped by the following.

    An important aspect of this work is to make friends and encourage people to grow

    in friendship with each other.

    The way that people can

    begin to talk honestly with

    each other is by joking andchatting informally and

    gradually strengthening

    relationships again.

    Listening is vital. If we are too busy concentrating on the results and forgetting the

    people, we will not get anywhere.

    It is possible to sit with a poor person and listen to her and strengthen her

    dignity. Sometimes you may think that she has made some mistakes but

    blaming her does not help. She is surviving. She is still here. Let her under-

    stand that you respect her remarkable strength. This way her dignity grows.

    Dont be stressed

    with projects. Take

    life slowly. Sit under

    the shadow of the

    trees with the families

    and listen to them.

    Sit in the cool of the

    night. Dont feel

    ashamed that you

    waste time.

    STOPPING

    TO LISTEN

    MAKING

    FRIENDSHIPS

    9

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Dont bestressed withprojects

    Take lifeslowly

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    10/26

    2 How can we encouragepeople to think?

    10

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Games can help us think in new ways. The following are two examples of useful

    games.

    This game is a light-hearted way of learning about ranking, and shows too how our

    personal views might not be shared by others. We might not all agree as to who has

    the biggest stomach! It is a good starting point for a discussion.

    PLAYING

    GAMES

    Line game Divide into two groups of approximately 10 or 12 people. (If small

    numbers, stay in one group.) One person from each group chooses a way of

    ranking the group, but does not tell anyone else what it is. They get the group into

    a line using the criterion they have chosen (eg: if they have chosen height, then

    the tallest person will be at one end of the line and the shortest at the other). The

    other group then guesses what criterion was used, and judges whether they were

    put in the correct order.

    Examples of possible criteria: age, stomach size, length of hair, distance from

    home to workshop etc.

    Chairs The first step is to explain that the game will show how conflict can be

    managed by turning it into cooperation. Then a written instruction (either A, B or

    C) is given to each participant who must not reveal it to anyone else. The different

    instructions are shared out equally among the participants.

    A Put all the chairs in a circle. You have 15 minutes to do this.

    B Put all the chairs near the door. You have 15 minutes to do this.

    C Put all the chairs near the window. You have 15 minutes to do this.

    Then they are told to start, following the instruction they were given.

    Conflict can beturned intocooperation

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    11/26

    11

    Of course, if each person obstinately tries to complete the instruction, there will be

    conflict between them, and this often happens. Those with identical instructions

    need to cooperate with each other, and the three groups (As, Bs and Cs) also need

    to cooperate. Several solutions are possible:

    putting all the chairs in a circle, between the door and window

    first putting the chairs in a circle, then near the door, then near the window

    partly disobeying, and using one-third of the chairs for each instruction

    hanging two newsprint sheets in the middle of the room on which are written

    windowand door

    disobeying the instructions completely.

    When the game is over it is good to ask about how the participants were feeling in

    the game. How did they relate to others? How did they respond to the instructions?

    Why? Has culture influenced their response? If they played the game again, what

    would they do? The discussion can lead on to real life situations of conflict: could

    they have been dealt with differently?

    Mapping is a useful way of collecting information and encouraging discussion.

    There might be some ideas for developing a health programme, and they need to

    find out which households use it already. Or maybe plans are being made for a

    farming project, but they need to know who owns the land. It is important to be

    clear about what information is wanted. Then three or four people draw a map or

    diagram of the area. This can be on the ground with a stick of charcoal, using

    stones, leaves, twigs, flowers etc to represent buildings, activities, livestock, trees and

    so on. Or it can be drawn on paper using different coloured pens.

    MAPPING FOR

    INFORMATION

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    How can we encouragepeople to think?2

    The mens map The boysmap

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    12/26

    12

    Different groups can draw their own maps and then compare them. The discussion

    that takes place while the maps are being made is very important, often raising

    interesting points that can be explored later.

    Do the animators in your community take time to listen to others? Why might

    listeningin this way feel hard to do?

    Do you know any games and exercises to encourage trust, or to teach other skills?

    Share your knowledge with one another.

    Would it be useful to mapan aspect of your work, drawing in many people from

    your community?

    Questions for

    discussion

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    How can we encouragepeople to think?2

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    13/26

    13

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Wearing hats to

    help you think!

    The animators found the hat thinking modela very valuable tool. They could

    guide conversations by asking for the blue hator yellow hatto be put on. The

    model helped to understand what sort of thinking was being expressed, and

    what was being left out.

    So what is this model? Let us take the example of a discussion about a villages water

    supply. Each colour hat represents a different sort of thinking.

    (ACTIVITY: Colour in the hats below to make them stand out clearly!)

    Gathering facts that are available and relevant

    The water comes from the well, 2km away.

    The women collect it.

    We use x litres a day.

    We use it for cooking, drinking and washing.

    What do people feel about the situation?

    We need more water: it would make

    life easier.

    Im so worried: my children get sick

    they need more water.

    I dont like handpumps: I prefer an

    open well.

    Agreeing on action

    We have decided to work together to dig

    a well.

    The wider view

    We step back from the situation and try to

    look at a broader picture.

    Why are we discussing the water supply? We

    wanted to help the village prosper. Are we

    losing sight of that aim?

    or: Is that site the best place for a well, from

    our neighbourspoint of view? Should we try

    to find a site that we can all be happy with?

    The blue hat thinkingstimulates

    discussion on wider issues and often reveals

    BROADER

    THINKING

    blue hat

    DECISIONS

    AND REASONS

    black hat

    FEELINGS

    red hat

    INFORMATION

    white hat

    3

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    14/26

    14

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Wearing hats tohelp you think!3

    a lack of information. So it drives the

    thinker to go out and gather new

    information.

    Looking forward to the future with a slightly

    optimistic view

    With a new water point, we could grow

    vegetables which might benefit the whole

    villages economy.

    Branching out in all directions

    What else can be purchased for $250? Why

    dont we buy some handpumps but also usesome of the money to buy drilling equipment?

    (One village who asked themselves this

    question, went on to drill their own wells

    for free and then set up a business

    providing a service to other villages. The

    profits were fed back into the village fund.

    They now have more handpumps than any

    other village!)

    In a discussion with hat thinking, any combination is possible. For example, it

    could go white-red-blue-red-yellow-blue-green-red-black!

    What is really useful is for the group, or the animator, to be able to check that all

    the hatshave been used at least once in the discussion.

    Would it be useful to try having a discussion using the coloured hatsidea? If you

    have tried this, did you find it easy or hard to identify the sort of thinking you were

    expressing? Did the hatshelp you make your way through a complicated or

    difficult discussion?

    Have you identified particular coloursthat are often left out of your discussions?

    If you have any other ways to help you think and discuss, what are they?

    Questions for

    discussion

    NEW IDEAS

    green hat

    THINKING

    THROUGH THE

    CONSEQUENCES

    yellow hat

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    15/26

    15

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    The obstacle to growth:

    How can we deal with selfishness?

    Every society is made up of people who are more or less selfish (putting

    themselves first), and more or less unselfish (putting otherswellbeing first).

    So often selfishness appears in the form of corruption. The ABCD programme put

    great emphasis on social accountability to prevent most corrupt practices. With all

    meetings public, everyone can see what is being decided. It is then hard to cheat.

    Where corruption did occur, the community punished the offender and replaced

    the funds he had taken.

    The programme did not usually channel funds through local or nationalgovernment bodies, in case they were handled dishonestly. Instead, employees from

    District Government were appointed to the programme. Through close cooperation

    with the Christian Outreach staff, they absorbed their values of honesty and

    trustworthiness, and no cases of corruption came to light.

    4

    CHALLENGING

    THE SYSTEM:

    AN EXAMPLE

    The communityhad challengedthe system ofcorruption

    On one occasion the community dug a canal for Food for Work (linked to the

    World Food Programme WFP). The sacks of rice were underweight when they

    arrived. This had happened before and the community had accepted 3kg per

    person in spite of a previous promise of 10kg per person. This time they stood firm

    and demanded the correct amount. The WFP supervisor threatened to take all the

    rice away unless they signed the incorrect receipt. They called his bluff: the rice

    was sent away, but two weeks later the full amount was returned. And for a few

    months NGOs reported receiving complete loads as promised! The community

    had challenged the system of corruption and everyone was benefitting!

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    16/26

    16

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    How can we deal withselfishness?4

    Selfishness also appeared in the form ofviolence. Cambodia was still a very violent

    country, where every householder had a weapon. Domestic violence was common,

    and gunshot wounds were frequently seen at the hospital. The programme staffs

    challenge to a corrupt system had to be a careful one which would not put lives in

    danger.

    At election time many NGOs withdrew to the city, in fear of potential political

    violence. In contrast, ABCD staff stayed in the province and continued to walk

    about openly in the villages, talking to the people they met in the usual way. The

    people appreciated the way they stayed with them, sharing the danger, and

    commented on it for a long time after.

    What would you have done, faced with the WFPs short supply of rice? What were

    the possible risks? What were the possible gains?

    In a potentially violent situation, how would you combine courage with being

    sensible about taking care of yourself?

    What steps have you taken to protect your programme against corrupt practices?

    Questions for

    discussion

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    17/26

    17

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    What are the keys to a

    programmes success?

    5.1 GETTING PRIORITIES RIGHT

    The ABCD programme began by concentrating on the centre of the diagram

    below: the values of the staff. It was understood that unless the staff shared the

    values of Christian Outreach and were able to put their own vision into

    practice, they would be unlikely to continue with the same sort of programme

    in the future without outside assistance. One objective was for the programmes

    work to be continued by a national NGO within a few years.

    So however many materials were provided and however great the skills, the really

    crucial part was the central values, for the project to be sustainable.

    Training began with a workshop on values. Then vision and strategy were

    developed. Next, a system for managing the programme was set up which would

    allow growth and learning to take place.

    As the programme developed, there were day by day apprenticeship, group learning

    and short course training schemes. Low cost offices were also put in place that

    could be sustained in the future.

    5

    VALUESANDVISION

    MATER

    IAL RESOURCES

    SKILLS

    ANDSTAFF

    SY

    STE

    MSANDSTRUCTU

    RE

    STRATEGY

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    18/26

    18

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    What are the keys to aprogrammes success?5

    Success or failure? In most programmes this is judged by how well technology is

    working. If a new handpump fails after six months, the water programme is judged

    a failure. But looked at from the point of view of getting people thinking and

    initiating change perhaps that failure could become a success. For example, did it

    lead to a sensible discussion where lessons were learned? Or did someone take the

    initiative of cycling to the contractor and complaining about the broken pump? In

    both cases this would be a sign of successfor the ABCD programme.

    But most agencies feel they need the working handpump: something they can seeworking and that they can measure for success, to demonstrate to their funding

    donors that they are using their money productively. So they try to keep the process

    of change under tight control. With a programme like ABCD, emphasising control

    by the people, the agency must let go of its own control. It must accept that failures

    can happen, and not be embarrassed by this.

    Finally, ABCD made it clear from the start that it would be in place for seven years.

    This gave staff and villagers the opportunity to pace their activities accordingly and

    to prepare for the time when they would have to continue on their own.

    Are your values and vision clearly defined and shared together?

    Would it be useful to share these again to strengthen and encourage each other?

    Write down some examples of successesand failures(real or potential) in your

    programme. Could these be seen differently by other people? For example, could

    any of the failuresbe seen as successes? If so, in what way?

    Do you face difficulties trying to measureyour successes, for the benefit of

    donors? If so, in what way?

    Questions for

    discussion

    WHATS A

    SUCCESS?

    Perhaps thatfailure couldbecome asuccess

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    19/26

    What are the keys to aprogrammes success?5

    19

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    5.2 FLEXIBILITY AND CLARITY

    ABCD tried to avoid both the programme patterns shown below: the one that

    has a pre-set agenda, and the one that is willing to take on the peoples agenda

    but has no way of assessing how successful it is being.

    Clear objectives

    ABCD made clear statements as to their goal (see the title page), and how this

    translated into objectives and completed tasks.

    An explanation of the flexible method

    The reason for the flexibility of the programme was clearly defined, so that staff

    knew why they were doing things in that way.

    Clear indicators of achievement in order to monitor effectivelyFinally, they defined potential indicators that would be evidence of success along

    the way eg: a certain number of clean water points, a percentage reduction in

    under-fivesmortality rate, a certain number of meetings held etc.

    So the flexibility allowed the community to set the agenda and work at its own

    pace, while the clear definitions allowed the staff to see their way forward and not

    get lost in a vague and complex agenda. This also meant that Christian Outreach

    could be accountable to its donors.

    Looking at a project you are involved in, what are your objectives and your

    indicators of achievement? Make a list of these: are your objectives clearly defined?

    Could they be made clearer?

    How flexible are you: is there room for the community to continue owning and

    driving the project?

    Questions for

    discussion

    Here we are:

    What do you want?

    Do you know where we are

    going and will you know when

    we arrive?

    Here are our objectives:

    1 Do this

    2 Do that

    3 And finally, do this to

    complete it all.

    OR

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    20/26

    20

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    What are the keys to aprogrammes success?5

    5.3 LOGICAL FRAMEWORK

    The programme used a Logical Frameworkto help them get the plan clear. To

    make a Logical Framework, you need firstly to divide a sheet of paper into boxes,

    like this

    Firstly the wider objectivesare defined for example, in the ABCD programme:

    Reduction of extreme rural poverty in this district

    Reduction of feelings of trauma, fear, isolation

    Sustainable continuation of the programmes work

    etc.

    WIDER

    OBJECTIVES

    PROJECT STRUCTURE

    MEANS OF MEASURING

    THE INDICATORS

    Inputs:

    ASSUMPTIONS

    AND RISKS

    column 1

    specific tasks you

    hope to complete

    Wider objectives:

    Immediate objectives:

    Outputs:

    Activities:

    INDICATORS OF

    ACHIEVEMENT

    column 2 column 3 column 4

    what is needed

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    21/26

    21

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    What are the keys to aprogrammes success?5

    Next, these wide objectives are considered in more detail. What will they mean in

    reality? For example:

    People able to continue making beneficial changes, after the programme ends

    Improvements in the physical environment and health of three communes, made through aparticipatory process

    etc.

    When you have written your objectives, move to Column 4: Assumptions and

    risks. This gives you the opportunity to think about what you are assuming to be

    true in making your plans, and what might stop the plans from being carried out.

    As you consider the risks and the assumptions you are making, you might decide to

    change your objectives to be more realistic. You might also want to add an extra

    activity which will remove one of the risks. Your aim is to take away as many risks

    and assumptions as you can, by re-shaping your objectives and activities. You mightneed to rewrite Columns 1 and 4 several times before you are satisfied.

    IMMEDIATE

    OBJECTIVES

    Your aim is totake away asmany risks asyou can

    PROJECT STRUCTURE

    MEANS OF MEASURING

    THE INDICATORS

    Inputs:

    Expatriate staff (5 decreasing to 0).

    Local staff.

    Capital for starting enterprises and clinics.

    ASSUMPTIONS

    AND RISKS

    Wider objectives:

    Reduction of extreme rural poverty in district.

    Sustainable continuation of programmes work.

    Immediate objectives:

    Improvements in the physical environmentand health of 3 communes, made through aparticipatory process.

    Outputs:

    25 village development committees meetingregularly.

    3 immunisation clinics running well.

    Activities:

    Organise first meeting in village.

    Obtain stocks of vaccine.

    INDICATORS OF

    ACHIEVEMENT

    Starting to fill

    in the boxes:

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    22/26

    22

    The next step is to break down the objectives into specific tasks that you hope to

    see completed, for example:

    25 village development committees meeting regularly

    Immunisation clinics running well in three communes

    Five project staff trained in animation, health education and management.

    Next think about what you will need to do in order to achieve these outputs. Make

    a list of the activities needed, for example:

    Organise first meeting in village

    Obtain stocks of vaccine.

    Now you can see what you will need in order to carry this out:

    Expatriate staff (five decreasing to none) Local staff (give the number needed)

    Capital fund for starting enterprises and clinics (give the amount needed)

    Transport (five motorbikes, ten bicycles)

    any further points.

    Once all these boxes have been completed, you fill in Column 2, estimating for

    example the number of meetings to be held per year, numbers of families who will

    grow vegetables, percentage reduction in death rates for children under five, etc.

    These will all be signs that the programme is working well, and they must bemeasurable, not just a matter of opinion. You can refer to this column as the

    programme develops, to see how far you are succeeding.

    Then in Column 3, Means of measuring the indicators, you write the methods

    you intend to use to measure the progress. These could be surveys, reports,

    evaluations, etc.

    As time goes by, you can return to the framework and update it. There will

    probably be changes in assumptions, activities and outputs.

    It is a good idea to check that your plan is logical by starting at the bottom of

    Column 1 and working upwards, asking Ifthen?at each step. For example:If these activities are carried out, then will the given outputs be the result?

    If these outputs are achieved, then will the immediate objectives be achieved?

    Try asking these questions using specific items from the Logical Framework, not

    just in general terms.

    Are you using a Logical Frameworkin your programme? If so, how does it help

    you? If not, would it be useful to make one?

    Questions for

    discussion

    INPUTS

    ACTIVITIES

    OUTPUTS

    COMPLETED

    TASKS OR

    RESULTS

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    What are the keys to aprogrammes success?5

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    23/26

    23

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Why is thinking creatively

    so important?

    When we think of poverty, what springs to mind? Probably a lack of resources

    in one form or another. Fighting poverty often means providing resources:

    new water points, more agricultural productivity, better training for health

    workers etc.

    These are all important of course, but development needs to put people first, rather

    than things.

    Cambodia is a rich nation with reserves of gold, diamonds, timber, untouched

    forests and silt-rich delta farmland. Poverty here could not be due to a lack ofresources. Why then were the majority of people economically poor?

    Partly it was because of things beyond their control: for example, the terrible Pol

    Pot regime and the bombing by the USA. But mostly because the ability to use and

    develop knowledge, skills and attitudes needed was damaged. The people of

    Cambodia could have started new schemes to reduce rural poverty they had

    considerable resources. But what they lacked in rural Cambodia was the ability to

    take initiatives and try out new things.

    This is not to insult the dignity of the Cambodian people. Their resilience in the

    face of adversity was inspiring. And their unwillingness to change anything was veryunderstandable: so often in the past to speak of change had meant certain death!

    That is why they had gradually lost the ability to initiate change.

    The Cambodian people had gone through a terrible time where they had lost belief

    in their own abilities: they had been disempowered. As a result, a resource-rich

    country was now inhabited by poverty-stricken people. For that reason ABCD

    focused their programme on personal awakening as the key to development.

    FIRST PRINCIPLES

    But this also has lessons for countries in very different circumstances fromCambodia: any programme seeking to tackle poverty must have as its centre the

    transformation of the mind. It should have a structure that encourages people to

    take initiatives, and every action must contribute towards that end.

    If we give the people a well, how long will it last? It depends! It might be destroyed

    by floods; it might become unnecessary if piped mains water is provided; it might

    suffer from poor maintenance

    We know the saying, Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, give

    him food for life.A wise saying, but should we not go further? If we teach people to

    fish, but the fish have died from pollution, or someone invents an electronic

    6Developmentneeds to putpeople first

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    24/26

    24

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Why is thinking creativelyso important?6

    weapon for catching fish: what then? What can we give people that is truly

    sustainable?

    If we help people to increase their ability to initiate change (eg: to protest against

    pollution, or to be one step ahead of technology) and to make choices (eg: to

    choose the new fishing equipment, or maybe to choose to change their employment

    altogether), then we have left them something sustainable.

    Perhaps we should alter the saying to this:

    Give someone a fish feed them for a day.

    Teach someone to fish feed them for a while.

    Animate someone to think creatively feed them for life.

    How do you define poverty?

    Do people in your society find it hard to believe in their own abilities? If so, what

    would help change this situation?

    What do you think of the last paragraph? To what extent is it reflected in your work?

    Questions for

    discussion

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    25/26

    25

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    T E A R F U N D C A S E S T U D I E S

    Seeing a collective vision

    One of the programmes notes written in 1996 told

    of a village where people had not been good at paying back to

    the rice bank. They thought the rice was provided free by the

    organisation, so why pay?

    The animators sold some of the rice to pay for food for a good meal to

    which they were invited. At the meal, they explained that the rice bank

    was to help the people through bad harvests, and they answered all

    their questions. When the people understood how the rice

    bank worked, they were happy to repay the loan.

    100% was paid off that year!

    Caring for each otherand planning for the future

    The Annual Report 1994/5 was delighted to report independent activity

    by one Village Development Committee. Following discussions about health

    problems and the expense of treatment, a village meeting was called

    independently of Christian Outreach. It was decided to form three voluntary

    associations: if a member became sick or died, everyone else would give a

    sum of money and a bowl of uncooked rice. This would be a sort of

    health insurance for everyone. Over 90% of the village joined

    one of the associations.

    Showing compassion

    The same programme noted the case of a needy

    family who had several people die over a short

    period. The Village Development Committee soldsome of the rice given as interest on pumps, and

    gave the family enough to pay for the

    funeral debts.

    Setting captives free

    One of the programmes notes written in

    1996 say: The village of Tang Lang 2 have

    decided to give up drinking. All the families on

    the east side of the road say that their men no

    longer drink rice wine. They have more

    hope and they are too busy.

    APPENDIX Impact indicators

    Which of the indicators made the most impression on you? Why was this?

    Are there lessons here for your programme? If so, what are they? Do you note down indicators of progress, to encourage each other?

    Questions for

    discussion

    Ending oppression

    Womens Team Animation Notes 1995 told of a discussion about wife-

    beating. An old man was listening, who still beat his wife because he said she

    was lazy. The women who knew them disagreed. He was asked if the threat of

    prison would stop him, but he did not seem worried about that as he had friends

    in the police. However, when they discussed wife-beating as a sin, he said he

    would not do it any more. A year later his neighbours

    reported that he had indeed stopped!

  • 8/14/2019 GPTENG_full Doc-Getting People Thinking

    26/26

    GETTING PEOPLE THINKING

    Glossary

    adversity Difficulties and misfortune.

    animator A person open to new ideas and with the enthusiasm and commitment toencourage others to initiate change within their community.

    Buddhist (religion) A widespread religion, practised mainly in Asia, which does not worship a god, andwhich teaches that people live more than one life.

    corruption Dishonest activity by those with power, often involving taking money or gifts inexchange for something, for personal benefit.

    criterion A standard by which something is judged.

    disempowered Made less confident or less powerful; deprived of influence.

    numbness A state of mind where one does not feel able to make any response and onesfeelings seem dead.

    passive Accepting what happens without any active response or resistance.

    ranking Putting into an order.

    resilience Ability to recover from a difficult situation.

    revolving loan A loan which is given to one person, and when it is repaid it is then given to thenext person, and then the next, etc.

    social A system of explaining and giving reasons to the community for decisions taken,accountability either by members of the community or from outside it.

    spirit The part of people that is believed (by those mentioned in the case study) to live onafter death and continue communicating with those who are still alive.

    sustainable Able to be maintained over a long period of time without the need for external

    resources.