gp report on rfid
DESCRIPTION
RFID implementation in a garment industryTRANSCRIPT
RFID FOR SHOP FLOOR MANAGEMENT
A dissertation submitted in partial Fulfillment of the requirement for the
award of Degree in
Bachelor of Fashion Technology (Apparel Production)
Submitted By
SHREYA AGARWAL
Under the Guidance of
MR. DEEPAK KUMAR
Department of Fashion Technology National Institute of Fashion Technology, (Hyderabad)
May,2014
CERTIFICATE
“This is to certify that this Project Report titled “RFID for shop floor management” is based on
my SHREYA AGARWAL original research work, conducted under the guidance of
MS.SHARMILA SURE towards partial fulfillment of the requirement for award of the
Bachelor’s Degree in Fashion Technology (Apparel Production), of the National Institute of
Fashion Technology, HYDERABAD
No part of this work has been copied from any other source. Material, wherever borrowed has
been duly acknowledged.”
Signature of Author/Researchers
Signature of guide
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is a well-established fact that behind every successful work there is hand of numerous people. I
take this opportunity to acknowledge their help and express my gratitude towards them.
I would like to thank Shahi Exports Pvt Ltd. for giving me an opportunity to learn industry skills
through this project and to explore my potential and develop a professional attitude.
I would like to express my deep sense of gratitude and heartfelt thanks to my industry mentor,
Mr. Deepak Kumar (Sr. I.E. Executive) for his constant aid and support and guidance
throughout the span of this project which helped me in accomplishing this project. He showed
interest in my ideas and helped me proceed with them.
I would thank Mr. Deepak Rautela (Head of Organizational development and training dept.) for
carrying my project further towards implementation.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to Dr.N.J.Rajaram (Director –NIFT Hyderabad), Mr.
Shakeel Iqbal (Centre Co-coordinator DFT) and college mentor, Ms. Sharmila Sure for her deep
interest and motivation delivered to me that made this work possible. Her continued guidance
and motivation gave this project its final shape.
Last but not the least I would like to thank Mr. Gunish Jain (An expert in RFID implementation
for garment industries, )Orient fashions, Pempro, Sahu Exports for being extremely cooperative
and sparing their valuable time for my research work.
1. INTRODUCTION
In today’s challenging business environment, manufacturers face greater mandates for speed,
efficiency, quality, and process visibility. Industrial manufacturing continues to evolve,
constantly adapting to meet the ever-increasing productivity and efficiency demands on the
factory floor.
RFID (Radio frequency identification) is one of the greatest virtues that can help streamline
operations, increase worker productivity, and control costs.
Radio-frequency identification (RFID) is a technology that uses communication via radio waves
to exchange data between a reader and an electronic tag attached to an object, for the purpose of
identification and tracking. Some tags can be read from several meters away and beyond the line
of sight of the reader. The application of bulk reading enables an almost parallel reading of tags.
It collects and analyzes production data during the entire production workflow on a real time
basis. This specifically deals with common production problems encountered on the shop floor.
An RFID system not only obtains information about production quantities in real time basis but
also traces the efficiency of each line, traces the performance of each sewing machine and each
worker. Most importantly it detects the source of the problem in real time. It shows who is
working in which bundle, fast resolution of bottlenecks and rapid tracing of quality issues to their
source.
1.1 PROJECT BRIEF
This project focuses on the proper management of the backbone of a garment industry i.e. the
sewing shop floor. It presents how the non-value adding activities can be removed and the
management of the sewing shop floor becomes systematized using Radio Frequency
Identification.
1.2 PROJECT LOCALE
Shahi Exports pvt ltd.
Industrial plot no. 1
Sector 28, Faridabad
Haryana
1.3 TITLE OF THE PROJECT
RFID for shop floor management
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT
Improve Visibility and Flexibility
Improve Global Competitiveness
Make Better Informed & More Timely Decisions
Balance Production & Improve Delivery Times
Improve Product Quality & Reduce Chargebacks
Improve Employee Morale & Reduce Turnover
Significantly Reduce Actual "Labor Cost per Unit"
1.3. NEED OF THE PROJECT:
Radio frequency identification for shop floor management was needed in order to avoid all the
non-value adding activities on the shop floor. These activities include manual preparation of:
Manpower report (Floor wise and line wise)
Daily Production report (Floor wise and line wise)
Hourly production report
Item wise SAM report
Time study reports
Also, efficiency calculation at the operator level was not possible. Hence, no incentive program
could be effectively implemented thus leading to less motivation among workers to improve
their efficiencies.
1.5 BENEFITS OF RFID
Increase operator productivity
Decrease excess labor costs
Reduce payroll overpayment
Reduced W-I-P and throughput time
Eliminate the cost of gummed sheets and counting
Reduce the cost of gross payroll calculations and producing the net payroll
Reduce job/bundle handling costs
Eliminate lost time at time-clocks
Fast resolution of bottlenecks
Rapid tracing of quality issues to their source
In order to frame this project in the best possible way and reach to the finest solution for the shop
floor management, several research papers and articles were reviewed. These are briefly
discussed in the next section.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
The success and growth of an apparel manufacturing business depends on how well cross-
department production information is delivered, handled and executed in real time. What is
required is a reliable platform to fulfill all these aspects of business.
Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology is the call of the hour to improve the
operational flow in such a complex environment of apparel production business. It collects and
analyzes production data during the entire production workflow on a real time basis. This
specifically deals with common production problems encountered on the shop floor.
Talking about production, an RFID system not only obtains information about production
quantities in real time basis but also traces the efficiency of each line, traces the performance of
each sewing machine and each worker. Most importantly it detects the source of the problem in
real time. It shows who is working in which bundle, fast resolution of bottlenecks and rapid
tracing of quality issues to their source.
RFID technology is becoming a popular tool for factory management in the apparel industry.
Although this service is offered by many solution providers in various areas, the functions of
those systems are quite similar to each other. Main components of the system are RFID software,
computer, data cable, RFID card, RFID scanner, RFID reader and terminal to display
information to the operator.
2.1 RFIVD vs. BAR CODE SYSTEM
Attribute RFID Bar code
Transmission Electromagnetic/ wireless Optical
Reading capability Non-line of sight Line of sight
Tag reading Multiple One by one
Reading speed 500/min 80/min
Moving object reading Yes No
Data modification Read/Write Read only
Data volume 1 kb <100 bytes
Both system have their own advantages and disadvantages. In the following I have compared
both systems in different parameters.
2.1.1 Process flow: Main differences in data capturing to report generation are.
Bar code: Print Bar codes --> Bundling with Bar codes --> Stick Bar codes on
gum sheet by operators --> Scan Bar codes by scanner --> Report generated
RFID system: Writing on tags --> Bundling with tags --> Bundle tag scanning by
operators --> Report generated
2.1.2 Scanning Speed: Multiple RFID tags can be scanned at a time and RFID reader
scan tags from any direction within a limited distance. Only one bar code sticker can be
scanned at a time and Bar code scanner scan a Bar code from front only. So RFID system
is faster in data capturing.
2.1.3 Installation and running Cost: For Bar code initial cost is less compared to RFID
but running cost will be high in case of Bar code system. RFID can be reused many times
where Bar codes consumed once can’t be re-used.
2.1.4 MIS and Reporting: In RFID you will get real time information. Real time
information can be displayed on terminals (operator console) in front of operators which
is the most important part of shop floor controlling. Where in case of Bar code you will
get updated information once someone scan bar codes. Normally after each two hours
production data is scanned in bar code system.
Reporting formats depend on Bar code / RFID suppliers how they designed their
package. Similar report can be produced from both Systems. In RFID system you will get
update within a fraction of seconds.
2.1.5 Manpower requirement: In Bar code system factory need to employ a scanning
person. On the other hand sewing operators scan tags on their own at the time they start
bundle.
2.1.6 Carbon Footprint: This point is also important because at present apparel industry
is concerned on reducing carbon footprint. In bar code system you will consume lot of
gum sheet and sticker which increases your factory carbon footprint. In RFID based
system no use of any paper. Data is sent to the main server via wires.
2.2 TYPES OF RFID TAGS
In real time RFID system, data is captured through scanning of RFID cards (tags) at operator
terminals (workstation). Generally, four types of tags are used in the line which can be an
employee card, bundle card, supervisor card or a job card.
2.2.1 Employee card: Employee cards are issued to operators and checkers. Operator
uses employee card to sign on at his/her workstation. If operator does not scan the
employee card system keeps her absent for the day. One more important thing, without
scanning the employee card operator would not be able to scan bundle cards at his/her
terminal.
2.2.2 Bundle card: Bundle cards carry a unique number (bundle no.) that is made in
computer to represent the bundles such as garment size, no. of pieces consist in bundle
etc. Bundle cards are attached to each bundle as similar to bundle tickets. When operators
work on the bundle they scan bundle card to the terminal. One or multiple cards are
issued against each bundle depending on the production system. For example, when
garment is made on sections (preparatory sections) and assembled at the end for each
sub-bundles duplicate cards are issued. In some RFID systems, bundle card is inserted to
the slot of the terminal while operator sews garment instead of scanning.
2.2.3 Job card: Job cards used to assign jobs at the terminals (workstation). Job cards are
also used for special purposes. Normally, each terminal (work stations) is pre-set with the
operation/job that would be performed by the operator. There may be possibility that
operator had to do multiple jobs. In that situation, operators use job card to change the
operation in the terminal. Jobs cards are labeled with job (operation) name and number.
Operator scans the job card of the job that will be performed by the operator.
2.2.4 Supervisor card or maintenance card: This system has option to record off-
standard work and lost time. To authenticate those lost time approval by supervisors or
assigned person is needed. Also when machine breakdown is reported by operator and the
issue is solved by the maintenance, they scan their card to stop the lost time request.
2.3 WORKING OF AN RFID SYSTEM
The process flow of the system has been explained in the following.
2.3.1 Data preparation: Data preparation consists of task such as listing of operations
for the style Assigning of SAM for each operation. Listing of employees, supervisors
Listing of machine type and class. Create bundles for each cut (lay).
2.3.2 Assigning job/operation to the terminal: In the line, each operator would perform
specific job. Prior to start work on the workstation operation is assigned to the terminal
(workstation). Assigning of job can be done by using job cards or entering job number to
the terminal.
2.3.3 Issuing card: According to the bundling done by the cutting department, RFID
cards are scanned by RFID scanner to assign bundle number to the cards. Assigned cards
are issued to the cutting department. These cards refer to the bundle numbers created on
the computer. Bundle numbers includes information such as quantity of garment, size,
color etc. Bundle cards are then attached to the bundles.
2.3.4 Scanning of cards at terminals: Each operator scans bundle cards (at RFID reader
that fixed on their work station) and start working on bundles. When operator finishes the
bundle, he/she ties the RFID card with bundle and keeps aside or moves to the next
operator. Once operator scans the card, information related to that particular bundle will
be stored and displayed to the computer.
2.3.5 Viewing report: System records all transactions made by operators and
supervisors. System analyses the records and display reports on the pre-set format.
Modification of digital information can be possible by administrator. For example,
system gives report of individual operator’s efficiency. Now how system calculates
efficiency? To calculate someone’s efficiency system needs two types of information –
how many minutes operator has produced during the day and secondly how many
minutes operator spent or present (sign in) at his work. First information is calculated
through total bundle scanned (total pieces) and multiplying the pieces by SAM of each
pieces (for the operation). Second information is captured from employee card scanning
data – at what time they sign in at the terminal and at what time they sign off from the
terminal.
RFID system captures all the information through RFID scanners and stores them in the
database. Whatever report one needs can be displayed retrieving data from the data source.
2.4 The RFID-based Garment Manufacturing Information System
The major components of the RFID-based garment manufacturing information system include:
RFID Token, which is a low frequency (13.56 MHz) and passive tag. Its unique ID is
associated with the bundle of cut-raw materials (such as sleeves, cuffs and hoods) which
are to be used to fulfill each order.
RFID Readers, which are installed in the cutting department, next to each sewing
machine and QC tables.
PC workstation, which connects 40 sets of RFID readers in business structure. Data were
collected to a PC workstation before uploading to the computer server.
Ethernet system which is used to transmit data from PC station to server.
2.5 Working
Workers’ attendance cards: When a worker goes to work, he/she will scan the RFID (Worker ID
Card) instead of the attendance card. Then, the computer system will record the total working
time and transfer the data to the company’s wages and accounting systems. This way, the payroll
department will be able to calculate his/her wages and finish the relevant human-resources
management works in a shorter time. Upon requests from the clients compliance (code of
conduct), workers’ RFID cards are also used by the factory for worker identification, work
records, salary calculation, etc., giving extra edge to the factory.
Typically, the management does find it difficult to monitor and understand the factory’s
production flows by using the traditional paper-based ticket records. The workers will
accumulate the records until just before the pay day (or will they use those records for
manipulating their overtime works). This will present extra difficulty for the factory in
calculating the salaries payment and related costs, hence further confusing the production
progress.
RFID Production Cards are registered through the readers at every machine or production
equipment, so that the information for the start and end of each job can be transmitted to the
main server for storage and processing. The application will calculate automatically and perform
statistical analysis on the production progress and unit salary costs, further achieving “Real-Time
Production Management Flow” and carrying out a complete monitoring processing in the shop
floor. The system is designed to show alert on the line balancing of each production department
as well as provide a large amount of data on staff production value and equipment utilization rate
for analysis.
To obtain information / data and trace it more accurately and real time: By employing wireless
technologies, RFID technology manages to transform the traditional paper-based information
system in the production line into a fully-computerized system for data storing and processing.
Industry can benefit less administrative costs and faster processes and feedback. Meanwhile,
RFID and ERP systems are collectively used for management-control in areas of material
control, monitoring the production WIP progress, order tracing, storage, logistics, recording sales
data and related security to improve the entire efficiency of the business process. It is the world
trend that the RFID technology is becoming more popular to replace the bar codes at a low cost.
RFID technology, for better flow amongst the sewing machines in the WIP process.
2.6 Some common on-site difficulties and problems faced by garment
factories:
Production workers at garment factories usually have a habit of keeping their job ticket.
This not only increases the factories’ overtime expenses due to compliance requirement
of extra compensation but also prohibits the factories from accurately estimating its
workers’ productivity.
Low efficiency in production is mainly due to a lack of sense of quantification in the
management’s mind. It may also be the consequence of a lack of planning in production,
a low utilization rate of equipment as well as a poor coordination of production
departments.
Loss of control in monitoring. For example, when there is bottleneck in certain
production steps in the line, the system fails to issue a warning within a short period of
time. In most factories, there are no measuring tools or standards which actually display
the workers’ performance. This finally causes serious production jam.
There is no database built up for in-depth analysis. In reality, a lot of factories already
have various types of computerized technology networks in place for monitoring their
production. These computerized processes and models do support a lot of different
settings. This will only significantly increase the factories’ maintenance costs.
Furthermore, the factories will also find it very difficult in obtaining the necessary data
for enterprise planning (some real-time statistical data regarding the production).
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Theoretical construction of the thesis
Initially literature review was done, so as to gain basic knowledge about the project before going
to the workplace. It is of utmost importance to have the theoretical knowledge and collection of
some sort of secondary data about the project, so that when it mingles up with the practical
knowledge in real time after going to workplace, it directs and molds the path in which the
project would be accomplished effectively.
3.2 Defining objectives
Defining the objectives clearly helped to focus on the goal of the project and provided a path
for the research.
3.3 Preparation of questionnaires for survey
Reviews on the project topic were taken from the concerned authorities and the concerns
were duly noted. Thus, the requirements of the project were framed.
3.4 Data collection and analysis
Working area was analyzed thoroughly, and the whole production flow was tracked. This gave
the basic idea about the various problems prevailing in the workplace. Problem identification
gives us the idea about the areas where the improvement could be done so as to arrive at the
positive results.
3.5 Field visits
Field visits to various industries were made in order to have a practical and real time idea of
the system. These visit were meant to analyze the pros and cons of RFID implementation for
the garment manufacturing.
3.6 Problem findings and their solutions
The identified problems were studied in depth so as to find their root cause. This usually take
some sort of time but it is very much needed so that prevailing problems could be rectified and
positive results would be derived based on the comparison made between the conditions before
the implementation of the project and after the implementation of the project.
3.7 System implementation
A prototype is supposed to be made and implemented in small section, so as to have the real
time working feasibility and thus to get the positive results. This will include the training of the
operators of that particular section and instructions are drawn to help the operators to follow them
so as to make the project work effectively and efficiently giving us the positive results.
3.8 System testing and further improvements
After the implementation of the idea in small section, the whole implementation process and its
outcome is analyzed so that if there are any sorts of flaws prevailing in the system, could be
rectified. These flaws need to be analyzed in depth as the next step is to implement the idea in the
whole workplace. So, it will be easy for a person to rectify these flaws while idea is being
implemented in small section rather in whole workplace.
4. VENDOR SELECTION
Four vendors were shortlisted as per our requirements of the project for the management of shop
floor.
These were:
Tagsys rfid
GPRO technologies
Tag n track solutions
Leadtec cgs inc.
The vendor selection was carried out on the basis of various criteria such as
implementation cost, maintenance cost, returns on investment, quality, customer reviews,
post-sale service etc.
The comparison sheets are shown below:
5. Cost analysis
Based on the vendor selection, a detailed cost analysis was done for Leadtec cgs inc solution
providers. Based on real time data and calculations, returns on investment was calculated.
FOR 30 SEWING LINES
Contribution per garment 100
Monthly Factory Cost of Operator 9,360
Cost Per Operator Per Day 360
Current Production per Operator 10
Productivity Improvement 20%
No. of Extra Garments Made Per Operator Per Day 2.00
Extra Contribution per operator per day 200
*Reduction in Cost of a Garment 6
Cost Saving Per Operator Per Day 72
Total Extra Contribution Per Operator Per Day 272
Total Contribution Per Month 7,072
Operator Utilization During the Year 50%
Annual Contribution Per Operator 42,432.00
No. of Operators 1,200
Total Contribution For the year 5,09,18,400.00
Cost of Terminals 2,74,50,000
Payback Period 6.47 Months
ROI 185%
Price of Terminal is $220/Terminal + $95/Terminal for license i.e $315/terminal
Software license fee - $8,000 - server license
Terminal License - $95/Terminal.
$8000 = Rs. 4,88,000
$315/terminal = Rs. 19,200 (approx)
For 44 terminals = Rs. 8,45,460
For 85 terminals = Rs. 16,33,275
4,88,000 + 8,45,460 = Rs. 13,33,460
4,88,000 + 16,33,275 = Rs. 21,21,275
FOR 2 SEWING LINES
Contribution per garment 100
Monthly Factory Cost of Operator 9,360
Cost Per Operator Per Day 360
Current Production per Operator 10
Productivity Improvement 20%
No. of Extra Garments Made Per Operator Per Day 2.00
Extra Contribution per operator per day 200
*Reduction in Cost of a Garment 6
Cost Saving Per Operator Per Day 72
Total Extra Contribution Per Operator Per Day 272
Total Contribution Per Month 7,072
Total Contribution Per year 84864
Operator Utilization During the Year 50%
Annual Contribution Per Operator 42,432.00
No. of Operators 85
Total Contribution For the year 36,06,720
Cost of Terminals 21,21,275
Payback Period 7 Months
ROI 185%
FOR 1 SEWING LINE
Contribution per garment 100
Monthly Factory Cost of Operator 9,360
Cost Per Operator Per Day 360
Current Production per Operator 10
Productivity Improvement 20%
No. of Extra Garments Made Per Operator Per Day 2.00
Extra Contribution per operator per day 200
*Reduction in Cost of a Garment 6
Cost Saving Per Operator Per Day 72
Total Extra Contribution Per Operator Per Day 272
Total Contribution Per Month 7,072
Total Contribution Per year 84864
Operator Utilization During the Year 50%
Annual Contribution Per Operator 42,432.00
No. of Operators 44
Total Contribution For the year 18,67,008
Cost of Terminals 13,33,460
Payback Period 8.5 Months
ROI 170%
6. SAMPLE DEMONSTRATION
Demonstration
The following is a quick go-thru of the actual application of the technology.
Operator Status shows current day efficiency and operator wise output
Section efficiency gives the line wise efficiency
Approve Off Std – To check operator off standard time & approve it
Line Balancing helps in better utilization of operator
Loss Time Report
Poor
Lin
e B
ala
ncin
g
Wash R
oom
No C
uttin
g
New
Sty
le S
ettin
g
Makin
g S
am
ple
Machin
e B
reak D
ow
n
Meeting
Wait F
or
Thre
ads
Wait F
or
Needle
Poor
Qualit
y S
td.
47.8%
86.3%
93.2%
98.4% 99.4%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Cum
ula
tive %
Hrs
.
Causes
[Loss Time Analysis]
Vital Few Useful Many Labels Cumulative% [42]
Cumulative Percentage Cutoff: 80%
# CATEGORIES LOSS TIME(HRS.) Cumulative%
1 Poor Line Balancing 46.48
47.8%
2 Wash Room 37.47
86.3%
3 No Cutting 6.71
93.2%
4 New Style Setting 5.042
98.4%
5 Making Sample 0.94
99.4%
6 Machine Break Down 0.6
100.0%
7 Meeting 0
100.0%
8 Wait For Threads 0
100.0%
9 Wait For Needle 0
100.0%
10 Poor Quality Std. 0
100.0%
Cumulative Percentage Cutoff: 80%
# CATEGORIES LOSS TIME(HRS.) Cumulative%
1 Wash Room 68.92
85.3%
2 Poor Line Balancing 7.91
95.1%
3 Machine Break Down 2.74
98.4%
4 Meeting 0.41
98.9%
5 Making Sample 0.35
99.4%
6 Wait For Needle 0.33
99.8%
7 New Style Setting 0.17
100.0%
8 Wait For Threads 0
100.0%
9 No Cutting 0
100.0%
10 Poor Quality Std. 0
100.0%
Wash R
oom
Poor
Lin
e B
ala
ncin
g
Machin
e B
reak D
ow
n
Meeting
Makin
g S
am
ple
Wait F
or
Needle
New
Sty
le S
ettin
g
Wait F
or
Thre
ads
No C
uttin
g
Poor
Qualit
y S
td.
85.3%
95.1% 98.4%
98.9% 99.4%
99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Cum
ula
tive %
Hrs
.
Causes
[Loss Time Analysis]
Vital Few Useful Many Labels Cumulative% [42]
7. CONCLUSION
Practical exposure of any theoretical concept cements the knowledge level. The project which I
pursued in Shahi Exports pvt ltd. helped me a lot to know more about the area I studied in a
more practical way.
The project dealt with the use of radio frequency identification on the production shop floor.
Other than this, system provides real-time production data for closer monitor of production
defects, downtimes, efficiency, production line visibility and other issues such as process
reengineering. It builds a culture of open discussion and scientific management, which is linked
to the concept of continuous improvement.
It also improves the work motivation of staff by creating an image that the company is willing to
invest in helping the employees to enhance their work efficiency and obtain a higher payroll and
bonus.
Some more advancement could be done to the implemented system so as to get more real time
production vision
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
REFERENCES (BOOK):
• Womack, J., Jones, D., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York:
Macmillan.
• Quick Overview of Process Mapping (Charles E. Wilson, TreQna University).
• The Toyota way (Jeffery K. Liker)
• Moore, Ron. 2002. Making Common Sense Common Practice: Models for Manufacturing
Excellence, (pp. 34-36, 48). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
REFERENCES (WEBSITE)
• http://www.learnleanblog.com/2009/07/kanban-push-to-pull-processing.html
• http://www.slideshare.net/tanujkujur/kanbanultimate-adi-apparel-interns
• http://www.kanban.com/
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanban
• http://www.technicaljournalsonline.com/jers/pastissue/Article15JERSVolIIssueIJuly-
Sept.2010.pdf