goverscience seminar on inclusive risk governance

8/14/2019 GOVERSCIENCE SEMINAR ON INCLUSIVE RISK GOVERNANCE

1/44

PROCE

EDINGS

GOVERSCIENCE

SEMINAR ONINCLUSIVE RISKGOVERNANCEBusss, 4-5 Dmb 2008


2/44

Interested in European research?

Research*eu s u my mgz kg yu u m vms(sus, gmms, vs, .). I s vb Egs, F, Gm Ss.A sm y subs b b m:

Eu CmmssD-G Rs

Cmmu UB-1049 BusssFx (32-2) 29-58220E-m: [email protected]: ://.u.u/s/s-u

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

D-G RsD L S, Emy SyU L.3 Gv Es

C: P Gy

Eu CmmssB-1049 BusssE-m:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]://ec.europa.eu/research/research-eumailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://ec.europa.eu/research/research-eumailto:[email protected]


3/44

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR RESEARCH

2009 SCIENCE, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY EUR 23910 EN

GOVERSCIENCE

SEMINAR ONINCLUSIVE RISKGOVERNANCEBusss, 4-5 Dmb 2008


4/44


5/44

3

Table of Contents

Foreword 5

I Setting the scene 6

II First breakout session on status quo 7

III Second breakout session on evolution 10

IV Analysis 14

V Conclusion 18

Annexes 21 Agenda of the seminar 22 List of participants 24 Project analysis 26

Ru: PD Dr. Ing. Stefan Greiving Uvsy Dmu (DE) Sm C: Philippe Galiay U Gv & Es

D-G Rs, Eu Cmmss


6/44


7/44

Foreword

(1) Preamble of the Charter.

defining risk is an expression of power. Whoever

controls the definition of risk controls the outcome of

sk mgm ss.

Ts s x m s Gvs Sm Iusv Rsk Gv-

ernance may indeed capture the essence of the difficulties facing our society in dealing with the progress

s gs. W s sk su sy s su k

? By y, s sy s?

Evyby gs xm sks ss ms, su s x, su b s ms, y m qus. Bu bu,

xm, s s s y k? W bu u-

s s m g?

I s y mm ss sy u vu bvu vg u m vus.

Would we accept to see part of the population evolving as post-humans with extended brain ca-

pacities or enhanced physical features? Would we accept to have our body modified without our

m s? Wu k u bg bu xs u,

vg , ms bs s gs m?

We would not favour either behaviour endangering our fundamental rights. The Commission signed 2007, g Cu Eu Pm, C Fum Rgs

Eu U, sgg um gs g gs

in society, social progress and scientific and technological developments by making those rights more

vsb C (1).

A su sks ss s g gss? A u

gv s sks A 13 C um gs Fm

s ss sg s s s s b s?

Ls bu s s quss: I u ms gg mvm

goods, person, services and capital in the European Union a fifth one for the movement of knowledge,

su mk su v Eu mm bs usg s sk

su ?

T s uy s s quss bu s g m s

ongoing projects relating to risk governance supported by the Commission and help us to go forward

s m y v .

J-M B

D S, Emy Sy D,

D-G Rs

5


8/44

6

a debate). Consequently, one should be awarein designing inclusive risk governancesms ub ss s s exponent of the design (example GMNation,Paganini). Also entitlement and ownershipbecomes more and more part of discussionbu g sks.

Methodologies for risk assessment and man-agement are transferable between risk settingsand cultures. Moreover, an indicator system v mg vs,

performances and results with regard to

sv ss sk gv ss(MIDIR). Expertise comes in layers, and is de-fined contextually: the legitimacy of know-g ms ub suy. T sby s ssb the extent that they acknowledge, and pick upon the context-related character of risk percep-tions and the effectiveness of managementsgs (Pg).

A ug by j yss s ss ugy , b-su quss y ss g(including risk governance) by whatevermethodology in science and policy. Systemthinking, i.e. acknowledging the complex,dynamic and permeable relations betweensocial and natural (biophysical) systems, is anbsu mus (sk)gv avoid fragmented sub-optimal and henceunsustainable solutions. Adaptive governance,of which surprises and uncertain risks (resil-ience thinking: expect the unexpected!) areimportant aspects, should include the meth-odologies developed in private enterprises(Riskbridge). However, a joint analysis is notimperative; communication between experts,policymakers and civil society indeed needs b s u bu s s vvdeliberation: organising (extra-parliamentary)oversight through smart transparency tech-

niques, notably in view of private enterprisegu u b v (Pg).

Risk governance is a moving target in theEu s . I, s sks their governance are constantly evolvingthrough scientific discoveries and techno-logical innovation, governance practicesevolve too through natural learning processesand social science research. This is why it istime to revisit the notion of Risk Govern-ance in the light of recent studies and projectssu by Eu Cmmss.

T s bjv sm s kstock of previously-funded Community

js sk gv FP6, -ticular the last three funded projects on anintegrative approach to risk governance(CARGO, MIDIR and Riskbridge). Resultsand observations from other projects morebroadly related to governance shed a newg s sus.

Beyond the usual participants in researchprogrammes at EU level most of the projects

u u FP6-SS v b s sks. Cv sy g-sations and policymakers notably have beensolicited as full partners. It was thereforeonly natural to have them as well in this RiskGvs Sm.

The quality of risk governance is improved if s b g u ssus(taking a broad scope), and an element ofgg gums bjv y b ymksand the general public. This calls for clarityin the scientific basis and the ethical andvu- ms ssb s.Clarity comes before consensus and shouldbe organised avoiding polarization butnot necessarily with the objective to createconsensus (CARGO). However, a public isan emergent category that evolves with mg ssu (ssus sk ub

into being; and vice versa: publics determinethe sustentative closure or opening up of

I Setting the scene


9/44

7

Group A1 on inclusivenessin practice

How to identify, contact, involve stakehold-ers and integrate their concerns into research?How to take care of their commitment?

Sk vvm s s ms m ms sussu sk gv ss. I sx m quss : W v sks? W ss xs? W k

m s v sks?W k gu ss s sub sk vvm? W s g?W s ? Nmy, ss s - by s/gu y g mgg sk, y m-y gms. T sk -s sk y , , g sks xss : Wv s sk s um

sk mgm ss. Esbsg sk vvm ss mg bsmu u y ksss gv mgm sysm smu m us gs(.g. by ssu sks - ub mss m s u u ub my u s-mkg).

I s sy k vu ub sk s u bus y v s by bss, v,s ssums (.g. bu s- -ss) sss. H gumg xs, sks s-mks gu vsy mg vus, s ms s g sgs skgv ss. T uu bkgus s g s m sg

sub vvm mmusgy. Mv, s b y sks, bu s bs mg b bm.

I vvm sk-s mmm sms b s s sks s- ms squy gu y b sks k-g vg s , bgs kg gu bussus y v m.Iusvss s x-.

A suu mmu guss s m qums m, kg-bs, , -

suv s-v sk gvss. I su susss quy v sgs -sv us mbgus. H, s yss ms y ssss s sks s.I vs ssby sk ss -s us sysm s ss. T s

x ss b ss, s-v uss , m bug us ug gss gu ss by ms -- vs vsks. Ts s ss ugy vs sy m bg b u mkg jugm s ysg. Bs xs -sss, gu uss s yss v usmssk vvm .

Hv, sk vvm s sugg sm ky gs: I myss, gus b xss s u m u s s (k kg/xs, k gug sks .). H,sg g sv sgus ug vy s y u

s. I umb ss s gg -s ss sks -s su s uu gs.

II First breakout session on status quo


10/44

8

(2) http://www.research-alliance.net(3) http://www.iso.org/iso/about.htm(4) See committee draft No 2 of ISO-IEC Guide 73 Risk management (Doc. I SO/TMB/RMWG N 66 re).

Group B1 on multilevelgovernance

What has been the role of the European Com-mission in risk governance up to now? Wouldthe construction of the European research areabenefit from this reflection? How does the EUcompare with other regions of the world? Howto interact from local to global leels?

I sks EU suquy su gb bus s s

.

S-gvg ks su s G-b Rs A (GRA) (2) sm s g kg-svgy gss, I- Ogz Sz(ISO) (3) s -gvm gs- ms bg b ub v ss, v mg s -

su sk gv y v ks bsug b . Ty vbms g xsggvms sus ms us s. T, s g s us mub s mg ss-s ks vs sysm ssv, x sks sk gv.

Evug sks u s guy mks s y u- s sk s u m. Tsmus b kg ug mgm s gs. I -, s my m vs k ys vu ms s kg.

Ay u s su us

mm Eu -s mmuy s usv

sk gv s -EUsk uus x Eu b m.

Group C1 on typologyand transferability

Is there a trend towards a unified risk typ-ology? Are methodologies transferable acrossrisk settings?

Risk typologies

Tygs v my -mss v s ssb gv ss. Ts ss/gus my v ss m, bus y ygy ssg s vm. A y- xm u b ygy, sgby gss, mg ssss - mss mvms mm s s . I s y,

ygy s sy bk-gu s sgs s s uss ygy s sg.

Rsk ssus mums g g : ssu sss u//sum sk, uus ssu, muy sk , g vsy, v-by gm u us gu.

As su, s s b s ss mx mu sk ssus mb- k u ygs, s sby v mgb - s, ug ssy sm- ssus s mumb ss. T ggsuss bu ISO 31 000 s sk mgm (4) ss s -

sm s u.T vss k s ss
http://www.research-alliance.net/http://www.iso.org/iso/about.htmhttp://www.iso.org/iso/about.htmhttp://www.research-alliance.net/


11/44

9

us us u ms sg mu-msy sk. W s su sm s vub g, -by su b mb v - g mxy. Ts su b js by sg us g uy ygy ussy sk ssu mss.

Transferable practices

O, s g s s

s by s quy um/sus. Rss y s jus sv s-b s: sm ssus u/su b sm ys. A ss gs k suss y sby gv s smu y jugm sk ssu. Dsussg sby s ss bu umus

s v b m s s mkg s s m susy, ug mss ss s v b . Ts s k x mv yss, g u v-us vs. Ts s qu m,s vy /mmuy s by u sks. Csquy,my s us s u ygs g g sk ssus s / mmuy.

I suy b , s gv ss m- ss u m bm.As su, s m b u m ssums m sg s. Sm g ssums u b b

s y.

Usg mgy: my sus -v ms (.g. sk, vuby, m-g .) us sm y sk sgs v b u by ygy. Ts s s. T s u,mmy gssy msvb y.

Dsbu gy: gs- su gms m- b? (s .g. s mg

Mmb Ss m s - ss u sg gv).

Cmby uu x:sk mgm s y uby s vu sks, bu s by us s-y s y mgEu. B sk ss bv

sk sus u by uub sysms, vu sysms s s s.

Cu u ygy sg bs -xus ms. As sk ssu s uqu, kg s-b s s k bs.As su, s bs s x-s: ss mss xy u sb. W yg su g x, su bqus m- m k u u-s x: sm msu b u suss, s u m s, sug -gb s ss.


12/44

10

Group A2 on spreadinggood practices

How to introduce the concept of inclusie riskgovernance to a wider community?

T usv sk gvsu b u s s mmus g ug ssus g m Eusss sk m-gm s s m.H, mx sk mgm suus,

bu s g sy kg bu-g sbs qus vm ss gmy v mvm. T us s u xusvy bjv mss sk, gg m subjv m-ss. Exs v ssby gg s v ub s g.

T mgm sks s bm -sgy s us. Rskvss my b bu s vsusmsgu ub s s, ub s b u bu sks. Em ss by sk-s ssus sk s uy u by s-us ub sk ssssm mg-m. Lkg ys sk mgms mks m usv-ss s svss y s, bus u s s vuby. H, sk gv b s s sy, -u s sb s m g gs v mmus.

T m s, s g-m s .. b u

ss gg ss s ss , m uy m-g us, mx, s-

u sk m msvs. Su s v b - v .. by MIDIR Rskbg s sss by vvg sksg m s (s x).

T mus s u sss,us by xm vs, s ugy usvss. T sub-y m sss bms m m qusb, s b-

b mxmum ss (PML) su -usy s b s x u gb g.

Ts my v m g s u zs gg by mg -s su s s, ugs, s s,mss mvms, bu s g gsss k ss bvsy.

Dss s sks k g, k my bss gg xs, mybs bbs bus y s- m by sss. Cmg s mu , v, y us, bus s vsmg b sv ym. H, sv gs m bbs jus ssbs. W ub s-mkg vg y s m , ss v ygs bby gy jusbym. H, jus s ssus bu ss sss bms m m, s uy usvss.

T m g g, bu

uy s ggg myu zs, s s m Eu s m xsg s-m suus, uu ss

III Second breakout session on evolution


13/44

11

suus v b v- v us. Pv s, u by s g, us umss ss v us s gg y ms u bu -vm. H, ss s b k m u vms ms s s Euy bu-u. Hv, s s us sk ss ms mg s bm.

Mv, msus, bs myss ub ms s s msus ssb-y v s b y mm. Ts sy vsb kg vus, bug msus bk by v uss, sk -ss . Hvg s s m, v vvm, g .g. by

mgm v, s b ss u suss Dvsm bjv: u sks.

T m s g by ms s usvss gks, g m g, .. ssus, bus - sk (g g us), bu s Eu s g.

Group B2 on decision-making

How to make legally-based risk managementprocedures and instruments on the European,but also the national and regional leel moreinclusie?

I s u s vs s-mkg s ys

g sks, bu v, s s xm. T ss mmm sks zs s my b -

m y s s sy vsb. I , um msm s-mkg mg b usu.

Ds-mkg s b s s y-m ss. T sg s sss b usv. T m mx ss s, m sks v, m m usvss s. I -, m mbguy uy, m usvss s .

F s g s-mkg ss, s m qus- s: guy mk sub us? W s b? Ds sys-m y xs kg bu mg ssu? T x s -s mg sk ssssm.H, uss mg b s-sb bus quss s.T, sg g quss s

m. Mv, mus b xs vv, quy v s b s- s b v. Rsk mgm b us s ss g-g um sk ssssm s-m s.Ts qus kg bu s s b g- u usvss. T su b bk m mgm bk ssssm (.. ss -m quss bm bvusug ss: s mmuy -g b y v sy skg ?).

T sk s s mm,.. by IRGC, gu s-mkgss: T sg ss s s s bu s m-

s kg bu sk s bss g v sk vv-m ss. Ws sm sks


14/44


15/44

13

B us su b m -gv-m y g sk mg-m suus sy, su s s uby sum vm gs-s (.g. Fs E I-) gs b -g us gb v,

my v vy vub sus -m us mk sk gvsysm u u by EU Mmb Ssm bus. Ts s xm u-s u kg bs/s-mkg s: us s ssy s-mkg.


16/44

14

Characterisationof inclusiveness

Inclusiveness is nowadays regarded as im-portant not only for risk governance, butfor any advanced management approachy m s s sks, u s vsb m jsyss (s x). I , ss-ug ssus sss bs, .. m v vv-m ub x mk v (5) (s A. 14 1:

Mmb Ss s ug vvvm s s mm s v, -u u, v u-g v bs mgm s) sk mgm v (6) m 26/11/2007 (sA. 10 2: Mmb Ss s ugv vvm s s u, v ug sk mgm s). H, sv- g s v b sbs v bss. Hv, usv-ss s gu ss y s, ..s s by sk, s b bg m (qus jus, s A 1).

Core principles of risk governance areobviously commonly accepted and trans-

ferable (s MIDIR), kg, k u su sk s vss mgm sgs (s ,bu s B 1). Ts sussu - su s, b s sg s, s s by s quy um/sus.Hv, u sg bs -xus ms (C 1).

Inclusiveness is more a procedural con-cept than a material goal, bu y - usvss s s -

uus vb, s mmus gg s s mgs qus v b b u-usy mv. Iusv sk gvs s, bu b u-s s sub u sm gs k sy. Rs b s y sysm, m-muy sy y xs zs , by ssg gg

m -b v ug suu. R-s mmus y vb u bg usv ssssg mgg sks kg m- , v bs vusbvusy y x , .g. bug sk ss, - b u by my s-mkg y.

Evaluating risks under conditions of highuncertainty makes science more prone tobe politically influenced (B 1). Ts musb kg ug m-gm y u s g.Hv, ms sks b yss s sus. Rsks ( u s) yssu by g m (7), y s g (s su

s gss) bu s ms(g s, b).Dg sk s sk y s xss . Rsks v smsvs s gvs, bu sy -su bss s m- ug jugm (A 1, B 1).

Moreover, decision-framing has to beseparated from decision-making, busss v b k by s

IV Analysis

(5) Directie 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in thefield of water policy.

(6) Directie 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of flood risks.(7) See e.g. committee draft No 2 of ISO-IEC Guide 73 Risk management (Doc. ISO/TMB/RMWG N 66 re).


17/44

15

gy ssb by sss gu s-mkgsss by v.

Spreading inclusiveness

Nonetheless, todays risk managementpractice is often not inclusive at all, .. x sks us s g zs usgs. H, bgs us s ss v ys yg usvss sk mgm s

ub s y g (s A 2) bu bs b x m us sk gv ss.

For spreading inclusiveness to a certaincommunity, the procedural approach ofrisk governance has to be linked with a ma-terial goal stakeholders are in line with.H, s vym y, bus sy s -

m by g s sys-m s b gsg s ss y g m s vs b uu mvvy sk u msus. T EUsSy Fu b s s xm vy ys ss sk m-gm s (s A 2).

Iusvss s m m-mby y ss my

s vss -y ss s (s A 2), .. x s uu gs -mus us sus m g. Hv, s y qus us, bu s mu quy vb m b u vv-m ub. Mv, usvssmks s y m gm

ug g ssby u-u g s s, s us- by xms k m ss

x xs FkuI A ggNDgu us -

gs Gmy. Nss, su y g s s m mks us bby m-sumg.

Inclusiveness is particularly importantand urgent in Europe due to the domi-nance of existing physical structures ( bs s mg s), v vsv us. Ts suus b mv u us msy v s s Eu s gv g (.. -v y s). Ts mks vs, b k by ub ms(.. s g) ss v (s A 2).

Iusvss s v sksu gg vms uy s- sk ssssm s qu y m. A sm m su mm bus -

ss xsg mgm suus,.. g msv mks, s s ms (s A 2).H, m ssy s sg mx sb s u sysms.

How to organise risk governance

Apart from particularly challengingtopics or risk issues, methodologies for

handling risks (e.g. how to organise andimprove the sciencepolicy interface)or how to organise risk governanceis as important as which are the mainrisks that we should better deal with.Iusvss gs m m mx sk sg s, m s s by uy m-bguy m sks v bb/g u (IRGC sk s-

, s B 2). D s gv us/ss v sg usvss:


18/44

16

O sss (.. gsss, g-s), s, mss m, ub vus (s B 2). T

s s qus mmu -usvss mmuy. Skg ug ICT/WEB -gs m vsus s (..G Im Sysms, GIS) quu g-gu mmu-. Ay ggy usv skgv su b sg - g-gus (su s .g. us) s qu gug v

muu usg. As ggss y u ssss-m, bu s mgm ms sks, m gv uuum BA MA gmms gg u- ss s , s yug s-ss b mmusks (s A 2).

I s x, sbsg g - s s/sy

bms m m m. M-v, mgs y sks b v s - sks ggssssm m svs. Fs-mkg, ym ms sm b qu gv m-xy gg vms (s B 2).

Embedding inclusiveness in European

research programmesIn relation to international risks the EUis uniquely suited to facilitating local andglobal interaction because of its owntransnational character. T, yu s su us m-m Eu smmuy s usv skgv, bu g -EU skuus xs, m

Eu b. S-gvg

ks, y v ks bs ug b ,v mg s su

sk gv (B 1).

Ig js ( suuus) my usv, bu y kg s xs. A I- j sk gv, uss g s mmu ky gs mmuy g us mg b usu - b gmms Ig s s Cmmuy s mk -gmm. T I gmm ms sus g gv Eu gmms, gs sus bs ssb mgm vy s -gmms uss mgm -qus, ssus sg , su m ks.I ss usvss s v, s

s by sy skg u uss v vvg m s mu s ssb vy gmm.I s sgs y xg g m g sg .

Mv, ERA-NET+ vy usv sk gv s sb sug vg xsv -

g g, -, Eu s gmms s s .

As Eu S Pg Obs-v Nk (ESPON) s y -u sg usvss by usg xsg, usv m s ymm- sub ssg ms sk.Mv, sv gv -

js y u by s k.


19/44

17

Hv, s xsg ks gs s v y g-gu- mmu. H,

Cmm Rgs (CR) s ssmby vs g us v Eu U ys m- . I s sbs my bus

s ub sbg b s EU sm .Ivvg v gvm

ss zs s y sg sg. T, CR su b vv y u s vy usvsk gv s mm.


20/44

18

Mutual understandingof inclusiveness

The seminar clearly showed that the participating risk governance commu-nity reached a consensus with regard to key aspects of inclusiveness. T u-sg s us y vv usvss sks sy -su bss s m- ug jugm. H, s ssy s s usv-

ss sks sss ss ssssg mgg sks.M ms usvss b u mmus s s g s s-b s. Cmmy sks , mg s, g.

Cy s bss - vu- ms ss-

b s.

Tus: B v sks s-mks xss ms muu s. Dsus ubs-mkg mks su s-gs vub my m-us sss (s .g. sss m u K).

Jus: Ass jusy y , u m sss.

R xs: I xs vv, s-mkg -ss s b . Ty g-ms k mv ss bug g sks, bu vss my gms.

P: H v s- gus (svy s-vs) xs k g ss?

This agreement, but also the considerable knowledge base which has been devel-oped, justifies more efforts in spreadingthese commonly accepted elements toa wider community. I my sssk s s bg us s mm- m (u quy mg-u v s squs).Ts s u m uzs, mus mg s, bus s vubs .I s mm us -u Rsk Gvs

Sm s . Mv, mg b usu ss usvssby vy sk- smk gmm.

Remaining questions

However, other elements of risk govern-ance remain controversial within therisk governance community itself, u

usvss s x- s s -y sk sgs s s uubkgu mg Eu us.F xm qus m s suss su : gy ssssm .Mv, sm s gu xsg sk gv mgs b sm sks (.g.gs, sus,m-ss s). H, b gs s-y u v gmsus, u bu xs.

Mv, , svsks s by, s b s- m uy. H, b g- usvss suu

us s sb. A , sk gvsu b g s uusss mb sysm bus m xms.

V Conclusion


21/44

19

As su, s s s b- s ss m- x mu skssus mb k u y-gs. T s s sk ygy vb s s by m bb mxy sm.

Mandate of the EuropeanCommission

W g mandate and the role of theDG-RTD-L3 g

mmss sms b m mg gg usvss y sk s vy u

s mk gmm. Mkgus xsg y ums (su s g s s)sms b usu s gumv bss ssy gu DGs.I , usvss su yb s s my vy sk-s j, b u by Cm-mss. T ssu usvssu b smu ug Cmmssmmu usv sk gv-. O ssbs s Cmmss

u b -sv gu m sk svss m us mmss.


22/44


23/44

21

Annexes

1. Agenda of the seminar

2. List of participants

3. Project Analysis


24/44

22

1. AGENDA OF THE SEMINAR

Thursday, 4 December 2008

08.3009.00 Administratie requirements

09.0009.45 Opening session

Mr Jean-Michel Baer, D S, Emy Sy D (RTD L),DG Rs, Eu Cmmss

Mr Pteris Zilgalvis, H Gv Es U (RTD L3)

Mr Philippe Galiay, Ams, Gv Es U (RTD L3)

Mr Stefan Greiving, Uvsy Dmu (DE), Ru

09.4510.30 Statements

Mr Kjell Andersson, K Rs (SW), Pug ssums s ugg u sss

Mr Fernando Ferri, CNR-IRPPS (IT), Tsby mgs sssk sgs

Mr Jaap Van der Vlies, TNO (NL), Ugy: A bsu qus ss g

10.3011.00 Comments from discussants and Q & A

Ms Anne Loeber, Uvsy Amsm (NL)

Mr Maurizio Cotta, C suy P Cg (IT)

11.0011.15 Coffee break

11.1512.30 First breakout session (three parallel sessions A 1, B 1 and C 1) on status quo

12.1514.00 Lunch

14.0016.30 First breakout session (three parallel sessions A 1, B 1 and C 1)on status quo (continued)


16.4517.15 Sharing conclusions

17.1517.30 Recommendations for the second day


25/44

23

Friday, 5 December 2008

08.3009.00 Administratie requirements

09.3010.45 Second breakout session (three parallel sessions A 2, B 2 and C 2)on future perspecties


11.0012.00 Second breakout session (three parallel sessions A 2, B 2 and C 2)on future perspecties (continued)

12.0012.30 Sharing conclusions

12.3014.00 Lunch

14.0015.00 Analysis and first synthesis by the rapporteur

15.0015.30 Comments, Q & A

15.30 End of the seminar

Parallel Sessions

Status quo:

A 1 Inclusiveness in practices

B 1 Multilevel governance

C 1 Typology

Eolution:

A 2 Spreading good practices

B 2 Decision-making

C 2 Prospecting future challenges


26/44

24

2. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Mr Kjell Andersson K Rs (SW) CARGO, Ag

Mr Matteo Bassoli B Uvsy (IT) Ngv

Mr Jos Brils TNO (NL) Rskbg

Mr Maurizio Cotta C Suy Iu P Cg (IT)

Mr Silvano De Iesu Rg Lz (IT) MIDIR

Mr Fernando Ferri Isu su Pz MIDIR P S (IRPPS) (IT)

Ms Katja Firus P Pj Mg MIDIREvm (IT)

Ms Marie-Valentine Florin I Rsk Gv MIDIRCu (CH)

Mr Stefan Greiving Uvsy Dmu (DE) MIDIR

Ms Monika Kosinska EPHA Eu Pub H N.A.A (BE)

Ms Anne Loeber Uvsy Amsm (NL) Pg

Ms Ermelinde Malcotte VvAg (FR) N.A.

Mr Elvio Mantovani N IT (IT) Fmg

Mr Luigi Pellizzoni Isu Sg Iz Rskbg Gz (ISIG) (IT)

Ms Tamsin Rose T P (BE) N.A.

Mr Armin Spoek I-Uvsy Rs C FAAN Tgy, Wk Cuu (AT)

Mr Jaap Van der Vlies TNO (NL) Rskbg

Mr Doug Wilson Ivv Fss Smms

Mgm (DK)


27/44

25

Commission services

Mr Jean-Michel Baer EC, DG RTD-L

Mr Paraskevas Caracostas EC, DG RTD-L

Mr Matthieu Craye EC, DG JRC-ISPRA

Mr Philippe Galiay EC, DG RTD-L3

Mr Franois Hirsch EC, DG RTD-L3

Mr Mihail Kritikos EC, DG RTD-L3

Ms Vernica Prez Blanco EC, DG RTD-L3

Ms Katerina Ptackova EC, DG RTD-J.2

Mr Ren Von Schomberg EC, DG RTD-L3

Ms Maria Weimer EC, SJ-J

Ms Viviane Willis-Mazzichi EC, DG RTD-L3

Mr Pteris Zilgalvis EC, DG RTD-L3


28/44

26

Argona: Arenas for risk governance *

I. Description of the approach

T u Ag j s sy ky ms v sk gv. T j vsgs s sy b s y sysm ss, .g. ss u s, u-my k. T j us suy y by ms, ub ggm u s mgm ssus, u -u ub sus. By s m mmu ms us b sy.

Fum, j vsgs g sk mmu b gskg uu ss s u. I j

mj s m s y s sy by mkg x u m us Rsm m s uu gs sgs. Fy, Ag s vgus v s gss us mgm gmms.

T u Ag j s sy kyms v sk gv.

II. Characterisation of the risk governance approach

T j s by-. I j mj s m

s y s sy .

Cmmu s ky s j. Ts s sy s WP 3 (s b).

T s gv ks u: ymkg suus xs EU g us s s u sy vm gs; s sy, b, s-v my; s sus; ub SEA EIA s g us Cz Rub, S, UK F.

T s s mu-ms. Aug s y ss

u s, ks u .g. svs (.g. g - [ys/x]), sks, vms vs s-mkg.

III. Conclusion

T j s sk gv g ss u s, bu b b s sk sgs. Esy um WP 3 (Ms ssus ms ss) b us sk gv ssus.

* Argona project (http://www.argonaproject.eu); 6th EURATOM Framework Programme.

3. PROJECT ANALYSIS
http://www.argonaproject.eu/http://www.argonaproject.eu/http://www.argonaproject.eu/


29/44

27

* CARGO project (http://www.cargoproject.eu); 6th Framework Programme.

CARGO: Comparison of approaches to risk governance *


T m j s m s sk gv by usg umb xm s; x sk gv b m s s-

mks g ub; mk mms msv sk gv- sgy mmu sus sus sk gv vss summ s g-v ymks s mgs.

T ss sk m s mkg, u sk u sk -b s s sk gv. Rsk-m s-mkg sm bs quv ssssms . T u sk u- s vv b quv (vu- ) s m - sk ssssm. T bv ms m sk gvs gv y kg s vus u.


T ms by. WP 1 ms mgs s v mmuv svs sks msvs ys, m mmu sks bs gy sks m. Fu, mmu- us j s us WP 5. Rs-vs m s gy vsy s, us, NGOs s b v mgs. T m s suss svs sk gv Eu, s mss s s y mkg suus, y-mks g bs ssb sg ssus g quy ss, sks g ub g sm v m sg, sy b v, s b.

T s gv, suu b. T m j s mk sk gv s s-mks g ub s smmu sus sus sk gv vss summ s s g-v ymks. T s s mu-ms, s svs/vms (s, ub), xm s sk ys (GMO, mb sk ssssm m mym ss) vv .

III. Conclusion

T CARGO j uss sk gv. I ms s jsu s sy, gy, sy ms ms su s g, mg, ., CARGO ss usv sk gv .
http://www.cargoproject.eu/http://www.cargoproject.eu/http://www.cargoproject.eu/


30/44

28

Connex: Connecting excellence on European governance *

I. Description of the risk governance approach

Mmbs k x v gss u sks v m muv Eu gv. T k sss

42 sus m 23 Eu us m 170 ss m ysg m muv gv Eu. I k - g g quy s gv muv sysm Eu U.

Ag kg m Cx, muv gv ss g ssbs xu g, Euvs. Ey m uby ky s u gm gv.

Cx mbs usg ss v Eu mm k-

g xsg su, uu vm Eu muv gv, ssss s s s ms bm-svg y m gmy.

I s m bug Eu- s mmuy ss s- x vg vu sv uss. H, m muv Eu gv suvv uu su s x, m ys kg, mmu.


S m Cx s k bug, s ss uss mmu,, bks yss ssssm u vm. T

mmu mg sks s mg v m sus, ks, kss. I s ms, by Cx - ss m . S g j s bug muv gv EU v m sus, j u s g -k suu. H, Cx s g g suu.

Ds Cx m svg muv gv Eu, s uss s x s gu Eu sus ys kg , g, EU vs. Aug s gus Cx m bss sy uu mmu, js y u u bs muv gv.

T s s b v by s.

III. Conclusion

T Cx j gy us sk gv. Hv, m us j s y b sk gv. F s, Cx m bug muv gv Eu, s s uss sk s-sssm mg. T m bs us j su s sy, gy,sy ssy sk gv . T Cx j b sgxm ms sk ssssm sk mg sk gv.

* Connex project (http://www.connex-network.org); 6th Framework Programme.
http://www.connex-network.org/http://www.connex-network.org/http://www.connex-network.org/


31/44

29

* FAAN project (http://www.faanweb.e u); 7th Framework Programme.

FAAN: Alternative agro-food network *


FAAN s j, ggs ms v sy gss (CSOs) v s (CR) vy uu s g-sg Av

g- ks (AAFNs).

T FAAN j s s us v g- ks (AAFNs).Ts v ks k vus ms: sums s us (.g. mmuygs), ss (.g. ms mks, gu bx sms), ub um( s), mks kg g--usm, . Su v ks s by m s g by ( m) mk s.

T s x us sks. Hv, v g- ks m mgs us m m g-us sysm, s bss u ms my b m bg s, m / v-

m ss my u sks.II. Characterisation of the risk governance approach

T FAAN gmm ss b s gus vv s. FAAN uss sm-suu vs, us gu susss s yss kss mmu.

III. Conclusion

W kg js k FAAN, bms bvus um usvss vy v mgm s y m s s sks

u.
http://www.faanweb.eu/http://www.faanweb.eu/


32/44

30

Framingnano: An international multi-stakeholder dialogueplatform to regulate the development of nanosciencesand nanotechnologies (NS&T) *


T bjv Fmg j s bu bv ss vvg -gy sks mg gu vm gy Eu Cmmss, EU ymks sks sgg mssug s vm ks ssby b vus sy.

T j ssss my mums sk s mgm s . C, mmu b s gy v mg v v ssb mg gy vm ss k bus.

T um j b s gv ggg s, s mms ssy v s gy EU v by.

T m j b v by sbsg mu-sk gu mgs s, su us mmus, b ub, s vm s m k-g, bjvs s suv b guy sus,g ssb vm NS & T.


T j ms , mmu b s gy.

T mmu b s gy s ky-ss s j (s b) s v m v v ss b mg gy vm ss k bus.

T s gv s, bu mu-ms, bus jms y , mmu b s -gy, bu s sk sgs.

III. Conclusion

Aug us s y gy, Fmg s y skgv.

* Framingnano project (http://www.framingnano.eu); 7th Framework Programme.
http://www.framingnano.eu/http://www.framingnano.eu/


33/44

31

* Intune project (http://www.intune.it); 6th Framework Programme.

Intune: Integrated and united? A quest for citizenshipin an ever closer Europe *


T Iu j s g js m zs

by Eu U s 6 mk gmm. I ms ug sks vm gm sss Eu U. Tmj m s s s suy gs s, u ss zs sy uy s ss vm gm Eu U. I us g s sss, b Eu vs, g mj mss zs: y,s, g gv.

Ag Iu, Eu U s g m umb gs, gv s gmy m s qus, s m ss ssu EU zs s mgg. Ts my qus s

u ss quss b bug bks s s: H s u k suug s zs? I mx sysm, s xs? W ss bg s EU zs vg? H xsg s s b s mss? W zsxg m EU s v gvm?


I s, g, mm ms Iu, j s g by s ms v v s s um-, mk m sus u by j m vsb m

ssb b y xy b-bs ub m. Cmmu- mg sks s mg v s sus, js, , m-g gu, bs Iu. Cmmu js, .g. b xs zs, s s u by s gmms, g vs, s sus, .

Is gg sy gg y s s j myss s ss s ( s, sgy, uby, m, guss s-sygy) y s s sgg Eu s s ss ums g.T s s s.

Iu bs m j s m ms s,sgy, , ms, m sus, guss sygy. I ss, s mu-ms s sysm ssssm vu us, sm, g.

III. Conclusion

Ds Iu sk, sm gs ms vm gm EU v s sks.Iu s sm bsus su s sy, gy, sy sk gv s.Fum, s mm sk yss (gs uu vm EU), sk mg (v js), mg ssssm qus.
http://www.intune.it/http://www.intune.it/http://www.intune.it/


34/44

32

MIDIR: Multidimensional integrated risk governance *


MIDIRs us s gus u sks v g susbys s s gs. T MIDIR A mms

ss gv s s mm, mg m- ss. I bs s m v gs muskm, v ug ms g ms gg s.

T MIDIR s msv sk gv ms b v vvm s-mks v msvvs / sks. I s b usg - s by sy v vs bgg gm ss sy sg sks s s-mkg. T s su by s b m m sk gv ss.

II. Characterisation of the risk governance approachT j ms by. I s b usg -s by sy v vs bgg gm ss sy sgsks s s-mkg.

Cmmu s ky j. Wu mmu, sk gv ss s ssb (s D/usg skgv).

T m j s bg sk gv y, s-mkg s- s by kg ssmg . Ts s b v by

gv s m jus v s -mss. Igv g ms mb vs ms . I s suu b. T ys su g: -z (.g. g us sm v, .g. v); v (b vs, .g. , , g v). B ys g (z v) mm sk gv ss.

T j sy s mums s usb sk sg -s by uy mbguy. Hv, muu mss s y m s ss, bu s b x g ssu j: s mm. T m

su b mb mm s s v. A mums, gy sk gv , su ss vms (-, m s ss vs s-mkg. I s ss mum-s sk gv b vus vs s-mkg (,g, , Eu, ).

III. Conclusion

T MIDIR j uss y sk gv. I ms s jsu s sy, gy, sy ms ms su s g, mg, ., MIDIR ss usv sk gv .

* MIDIR project (http://www.midir.eu); 6th Framework Programme.
http://www.midir.eu/http://www.midir.eu/http://www.midir.eu/


35/44


36/44

34

Paganini: Participatory governance and institutional innovation *


Pg vsgs bus bm svg umb gy us s EU gv. I ks ym us y s

j s s : m, , , gy vm.

Ps s mss y m x uum , ub suss sus ms s- sg. Ts s sgy mv, m vu-bs s, su s ss ssby s -um u, uugs / s by. I s s msms gv b s m ymkg mu su xm s bkg .

T s sk gv. Hv, Pg s gvs g: Gv s gvg, .., ss s uk jy u ub squs u vs um vy, s g, s, gu s s.

A m s sss s k umb s g-g m sm s, g sg, u mms u s-v gy m y y s s gv-, y mg b gv uu, s ys s.


Tus s ky s j. Bug us ug ub s y m WPs, bu s gug j.

T j v sv s sus sk uus (u-s). Pg k u ym us y s s j s : m, , , gy, vm.

III. Conclusion

Pg s s by b us gv sk gv s y sm . Ky s sk gv, su s us bug skvvm, vss g s m by j. Iusvss s m s.

* Paganini project (http://www.paganini-project.net); 6th Framework Programme.
http://www.paganini-project.net/http://www.paganini-project.net/http://www.paganini-project.net/


37/44

35

Riskbridge: Building robust, integrative interdisciplinarity,governance models for emerging and existing risks *

A j u by Eu U 6 mk gmm s.


T j ms vg gv sk gv g skssssm, sk mgm sk mmu bs s su-sv . T j s j u usg ssk gv m. I s ks y g s m , g gg u ss s s, ss gg bus, ss s-y ss mx, mbguus sk s gm sk gv s sm, , mgg sks.

Ru sk s s s um g sk gv; s

s m s susv sk gv. I s m-my gs gg bg bs gs sks us zs vs s-mkg sss s s ss kg su s-mkg u.

T v u s gs, sk gv s sg gv ms k ss m sk ssssm, mgm mmu m sy sv. Ts qus g ssus:

s ss k g sk ssus; sks v m my s mx sks, s ss u j ssssms;

mmu b xs ug s kg ymksusg s kg s-mkg s b s u; s ssy bu (sk) bgs b s mmus s;

gms su, vvg ub, sg u sk gus, b vs b vu s v y b umusxms m vvg zs; ms us v v usu sk mus b s xs s.

Du mxy, mbguy / vy mg, g s s: bgy/sm s, v s, gy, m g, s-

ms mg s.


T j ms b ymks xs. Rsk mmus sk gv s Rskbg j ks u.Esy ug gs kss, sk mmu s ky ss.

I s us s sk ssssm, sk mgm sk mmu- bs s susv . Rskbg sss gss gv .

*Riskbridge project (http://www.riskbridge.eu); 6th Framework Programme.
http://www.riskbridge.eu/http://www.riskbridge.eu/http://www.riskbridge.eu/


38/44

36

D s ss k g sk ssus; sks m my s mx sks, s ss u j ssssms.

Cmmu b xs ug s kg ymksusg s kg s-mkg s b s u; s ssy bu (sk) bgs b s mmus s.

N gms su, vvg ub, sg u sk gus, b vs vu s v y b umus x-ms m vvg zs. Ms us v v usu sk mus b s xs s.

T s mu-ms: s ms sk gv ys s bs sk gv ms. Mv, y sk s k u, ss-s, ss-sy ss-gg s us.

III. Conclusion

T m bu k kgs sus vb -j s. I s y ssb my vs j m m. T yss bv s bs s um.


39/44

37

* Safmams project (http://www.ifm.dk/safmams); 6th Framework Programme.

Safmams: Scientific advice for fisheries management at multiple scales *


Smms s sgs m xsg s js mgm sss ms usu ms s v m vm mgm m-

mus s sgs sss s-mks.

T j s us u sk, bu mb s kg m vm mgm. Hv, b j s susb x qub sbu u su ssy gg mx ys ss um u s s u s.Ts b us b ss s sk gv.

T j vv bs sks.

I m v ms s v su k ms js uss ss mgm.

I ss sks vv ss mgm s-mkg vus ss j s sss m j g m s sus.

I ss s sss m ss b m mgm mmuy, by g s s b s y, ug s kg ssm vs. Ts u uvus vs gvm, s y ss, us gus sv NGOs.Lsss b b ss ss Eu A, M s- ss s s s s y vg.


T j ms b ymks, sks sss. T s s s.

T s gv, bus u j u vus vs gvm.

T j s y mu-ms. Bss vus vs gvm, u- j u s y ss, us gus sv NGOs,m v b m vm mgm.

III. Conclusion

W kg js k Smms, bms bvus um usv-ss s vy v mgm y m s s sks u.
http://www.ifm.dk/safmamshttp://www.ifm.dk/safmams


40/44


41/44

Eu Cmmss

EUR 23910 GOVERSCIENCE SEMINAR ONINCLUSIVE RISK GOVERNANCE

Luxmbug: O O Pubs Eu Cmmus

2009 38 . 21 x 29.7 m

ISBN 978-92-79-11291-1 10.2777/63097


42/44


43/44

HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS

Publications for sale:

v EU Bks (://bks.u.u); m yu bks by qug , ubs / ISBN umb; by g u ss gs y. Yu b s

I (://bks.u.u) by sg x +352 2929-42758.

Free publications: v EU Bks (://bks.u.u); Eu Cmmsss ss gs. Yu b

s I (://.u.u) by sg x +352 2929-42758.
http://bookshop.europa.eu/http://bookshop.europa.eu/http://bookshop.europa.eu/http://bookshop.europa.eu/http://bookshop.europa.eu/http://ec.europa.eu/http://ec.europa.eu/http://ec.europa.eu/http://bookshop.europa.eu/http://bookshop.europa.eu/http://bookshop.europa.eu/


44/44

KI-NA-23910-EN-C

Rsk gv s mvg g Eu s . I, s sks gv sy vvg ug s svs gv, gv s vv ug u g sss sscience research. This is why it is time to revisit the notion of Risk Governance in theg sus js su by Eu Cmmss.

10.2777/63097

goverscience seminar on inclusive risk governance

Documents