government of nepal national planning commission poverty ...€¦ · review of climate budget code...

REVIEW OF CLIMATE BUDGET CODE APPLICATION

Government of NepalNational Planning Commission

Poverty Environment Initiative-SMPC

June 2013

Empowered lives..Resilient nations..

Government of NepalNational Planning CommissionSingha DurbarKathmandu, NepalTel.: +977-1-4211629Website: www.npc.gov.np

United Nations Development ProgrammeUnited Nations HousePulchowk, LalitpurTel.: + 977-1-5523200PO Box 107 Kathmandu, NepalWebsite: www.un.org.npwww.undp.org.np

United Nations Environment ProgrammeUNEP Regional Office for Asia and the Pacif U.N. Building, 2nd Floor, Block ARajdamnernNok AvenueBangkok 10200, ThailandTelephone: + 662- 288-1604Website: www.unep.org

For Further Information :











table of Content

1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................5

2. Rationale and Methodology ..............................................................................................5

3. Objective of the evaluation ................................................................................................5

4. Methodology ...........................................................................................................................5

5. Findings .....................................................................................................................................6 5.1 Climate budget ..............................................................................................................6 5.2 Ministries with climate activities ..............................................................................7 5.3 Climate budget of the ministries .............................................................................7 5.4 Relevance level of allocated climate budget ......................................................8 5.5 Recurrent and capital budget breakdown ...........................................................9 5.6 Climate budget share within ministries ............................................................. 11 6. Comparison of Climate Change Budget with CPEIR Findings ............................ 11 6.1 Number of Climate Programmes .......................................................................... 12 6.2 Climate Budget by the Category of Services and

Functions of the Government ............................................................................... 13 6.3 Local Component of Climate Change Budget ................................................. 14

7. Observations ......................................................................................................................... 158. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 159. Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 16

Appendix I: Climate Budget Code and Programs 2012/13 ...................................... 17

5

1. introductionIn December 2011, National Planning Commission (NPC) of the Government of Nepal (GoN) with the support from Poverty Environment Initiative (PEI) programme of UNEP /UNDP conducted a study on Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (CPEIR). Thestudy suggested, among others, to begin using climate budge code in the national budget in order to facilitate tracking of climate budget and expenditure.In this connection, NPC with support from the Ministry of Finance formed a climate finance working group comprising of representatives from key ministries including the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment; Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation; and Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development. The group developed coding criteria and procedure through series of consultations with the stakeholders. Using the criteria and procedure developed, NPC introducedclimate budget codein the programme budget of the Fiscal Year 2012/13 and added this information to its programme budget sheets, which list major programmes of the ministries. The climate budget code is done at the programme level. The Ministry of Finance incorporated the climate coding in its data base of the budget.

2. Rationale and methodologyThe following fiscal year 2013/14 will bethe second year in which climate budge code will be used in the programme budget. The lessons of using climate code in the year 2012/13 will be helpful in making climate code more effective. However, because the parliament had been dissolved in May 2012, the budget announcement for the fiscal year 2012/13 was done in three separate installments through presidential ordinances. One third of the budget was presented through the first ordinance followed by a second ordinance to release the second installment of another one third of the budget. The last batch of the budget was released through the third ordinance after the formation of the election government, which is also responsible for preparing the budget for the next fiscal year 2013/14. Since this would be the second annual budget with climate budget code included, it would be wise to revisit the coding criteria and procedure in order to identify the areas for improvement in the code application. With this understanding, a rapid evaluation of the code application has been done. The evaluation is based on the analyses of the information generated by climate budget codeavailable in the budget data base of the Ministry of Finance.

3. objective of the evaluationThe review was conducted with the following objectives:• assessthetotalbudgetallocatedforclimatechangeintheyear2012/13;• identifytheministriesthathaveclimatechangerelatedprogrammes;• comparetheinformationgeneratedbytheclimatecodewiththefindingsofCPIER(2011);• assessthedifficultiesfacedandgapsincodingtheclimatebudget;• identifyareasforimprovementforthenextcoding;and• informthedecision-makersabouttheeffectivenessofthecodingasatoolforplanningandcoordinating

climate projects.

4. methodologyThe evaluation was done in the first two weeks of May, 2013. The evaluation is based on the analyses of the information generated by climate change budget code in the budget data base, which would, under normal circumstance, appear as annex to the budget document called the Redbookof the Ministry of Finance. However, due to the current political situationthe Ministry of Finance announced the budget without climate code annex in order to avoid confusion the new annex in the Redbookmight trigger about the government’s programme. As a result, the Redbook did not include the new annex with climate information even though they were available in the data base. For the purpose of the review, the climate

6

information was extracted from the budget database, and it was compared with the findings of the CPEIR study to examine the value added by the climate change budget code in understanding climate change expenditure.Further,an in-houseconsultationmeetingwasorganizedtoassesspracticaldifficultiesandgaps that theplanningofficersmighthaveexperiencedwhilecoding.ThemeetingwasparticipatedbyplanningofficialsoftherelevantministriesandthatoftheNPC.Theinformationfromthereviewaswellasfrom the interaction programme has been compiled with analysis in this report.

5. findings5.1 Climate budget

The budget allocated for climate change related activities in 2012/13 is NRs. 27,28,26,29,000, which is 6.74 % of the total budget and 1.6 % of the total GDP. The climate change budget during the last fiscal year as estimated by CPIER was NRs. 27,62,88,48,000, which was 7.18 % of the total budget and 1.8 % of thetotal GDP (Table 1). In total, the climate code, which is based on approved criteria for defining climate activities (NPC, 2012), has shown slightly lower budget allocated for climate change related activities than estimated by CPEIR study.

Fig 1. Share of climate change budget in the total budget

table 1: Climate public financing details (NRs in '000)

HeadingsFiscal year

2011/12 (CPeiR) 2012/13 (this study)

Annual budget 384,900,000 404,824,700

GDP 1,557,000,000 1,750,000,000

Climate budget 27,628,848 27,282,629

Climate budget as % of annual budget 7.18 6.74

Climate budget as % of GDP 1.8 1.6

Number of Ministries with climate budget allocation 8 9

Number of budget heads 83 (33 highly +44 Moderate +6 Low)

99(70 highly relevant + 29 moderately relevant)

Source: CPEIR, 2011 and Ministry of Finance, 2013

7

5.2 miNistRies witH Climate aCtivities

Out of 27 ministries, nine as shown below have climate related budget allocation in their budget headings. TheCPEIR (2011) had indicated 8 ministries, of which Ministry of Physical Planning and Works wassplit into Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport, and Ministry of Urban Development.Budget head 307 Ministry of Industry MoIBudget head 308 Mintsry of energy MoEBudget head 312 Mintsry of Agriculture and Development MoADBudget head 329 Ministry of Forest and soil conservation MFSCBudget head 331 Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology MoSTEBudget head 337 Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport MoPITBudget head 347 Ministry of Urban Development MoUDBudget head 357 Ministry of Irrigation MoIrBudget head 365 Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MoFALD

5.3 Climate budget oF tHe miNistRies

The table 2 below shows the share of each of the nine ministries in the total climate change budget. Of the total climate change budget, the Ministry of Agriculture and Development (MoAD) has the highest share (28%) followed by the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) (25.9%), Ministry of Irrigation (MoIr) (20.4%) and Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (MoSTE) (9.6%). Thus these four ministries occupy about 84 % of the total climate change budget. The Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport (MoPIT) has the lowest (1.5 %) share of the total climate change budget. The CPEIR had estimated that the four ministries i.e. Physical Planning and Works, Federal Affairs and Local Development, Irrigation, and Science, Technology and Environment had about 77% share of the total climate change budget. Almost all the climate related budget within the Ministry of Physical Planning and Works have been shifted to the Ministry of Urban Affairs in the present context.

The climate coding showed different figures for the MoADwhere additional programmes were found to be related to climate change than shown in CPEIR (2012), while in the case of the Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development (MoFALD), 6 programmes, which were considered climate programmes by CPEIR (2012) have not been coded as climate activity in the present budget coding. Hence, the share of the MoADin the climate budget has increased and that of the MoFALDhas decreased in comparison to results of the CPEIR.

table 2: ministries with their share of climate change related budget (NRs)

ministry2011/12 (CPeiR) 2012/13 (this study)

amount % amount %

MoI 954673 3.5 264100 1.0

MoE 731988 2.6 158910 0.6

MoAD 2478070 9 7642389 28.0

MFSC 2195372 7.9 2262945 8.3

MoSTE 2780502 10.1 2628556 9.6

PoPIT 7821893 28.3 398181 1.5

MoUD 0 0 7066642 25.9

MoIr 4802444 17.4 5552932 20.4

MoFALD 5860176 21.2 1307974 4.8

total 27625118 100 27282629 100

Source: Data base of MoF, 2013 and CPEIR, 2011

8

Fig 2.Climate budget share of the ministries as indicated by climate code (in %)

Fig 3. Relevance level of climate budget

5.4 RelevaNCe level oF alloCated Climate budget

Thelevelofrelevanceoftheclimatebudgethasbeencategorizedashighlyrelevant,moderatelyrelevantor neutral. Programme that have more than 60% of the budget allocated for climate related activities havebeencategorizedashighlyrelevanttoclimatechange,whiletheprogrammeswith20-60%budgetallocated for climate change relatedactivitieshavebeencategorizedasmoderately relevant to climatechange. Programmes with no or less than 20% of the budget allocated to climate related activities have been considered as climate neutral programme. Based on these criteria, the climate code reveled that about 2/3rd of the climate budget in 2012/13 has been allocated for highly relevant climate activities while 1/3rd is allocated for moderately relevant activities (Fig. 3).The table below shows relevance level of the climate budget under each ministry. Accordingly, the ministries

of MoAD, MFSC, MoUD, and MoFALD have both high and moderate category of climate budget. The other ministries have only highly relevant category.Table 3 also shows that 70 budget items are highly relevant to climate change, while and 29 are moderately relevant.

9

ministries

Climate Change related budget (in Rs.‘000)

Highly relevant moderately relevant

amount Number of budget head amount Number of

budget head

MoI 264100 2 0

MoE 158910 7 0

MoAD 660363 6 6982026 14

MFSC 1363595 16 899350 7

MoSTE 2628556 12 0 0

PoPIT 398181 1 0 0

MoUD 6772632 11 294010 3

MoIr 4449556 10 1103376 5

MoFALD 1307974 5 0 0

total 18003867 70 9278762 29

Table 3. Level of relevancy

Table 4: Recurrent and capital budget breakdown

5.5 ReCuRReNt aNd CaPital budget bReakdowN

About 52 % of the highly relevant budget has been allocated as capital budget, while the share of capital budget under moderately relevant budget is only 21 %. The rest is under recurrent budget (see Box 1 for definitions). However, on the total climate change budget the share of recurrent budget is 58 %, while the capital budget is only 42 %.

ministries

budget under climate activity (in Rs.’000)

Highly relevant moderately relevant

Recurrent Capital Recurrent Capital

MoI 12386 251714 0 0

MoE 18689 140221 0 0

MoAD 523573 136790 6816805 165221

MFSC 562561 801034 376696 522654

MoSTE 2566522 62034 0 0

PoPIT 9881 388300 0 0

MoUD 3561225 3211407 7548 286462

MoIr 130504 4319052 87174 1016202

MoFALD 1227606 80368 0 0

total 8612947 9390920 7288223 1990539

10

Box 1.Budget type

Each budget head is represented by 7 digits in the Redbook. The first 3 digits of the budget code indicate Ministries or Constitutional bodies. The fourth, fifth and the sixth digit indicatedepartment,officeandproject.The7th digit indicates the type of budget, whicharecategorizedunderthreesub-groupsi.e.recurrentcosts,capitalexpenditure,andfinancing. If the 7th digit is 3, it indicates that the budget is allocated for recurrent costs, whereas number 4 indicates capital costs. If the 7th digit is 5 under the budget head it indicates financing costs. Recurrent and capital costs of the national Forest Development and management Programme of the Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation is indicated bybudgethead329106-3/4asshownbelow.

Recurrent costs: Recurrent cost is the expenditure other than capital and financing and which are annually spent by the government organization. Such expenditure includesconsumption expenditure, expenditure necessary for daily activities, the expenditure for the services for public welfare and the grants provided to the institutions responsible for such public welfare services. The interest expenses of the loan and refund expenditure also include under this heading.

Capital costs: The expenditure made for fixed assets like furniture and fixtures, vehicles, machinery parts and instruments etc are known as capital costs. The capital expenditure adds fixed assets, which can be used for further production activities. Stock of assets for strategic importance and emergency use, land, buildings, roads, canals, electricity generation plant, forest plantation, mining, up gradation of projects, research study, consultation services for such capital nature of activities are also included under capital expenditure. Custom duty & tax and the compensation for the loss of capital are also included under capital expenditure.

Financing costs:Therepaymentofprincipleiscategorizedunderthisheading.Itincludesinternal loan and share investment and repayments of principle and foreign loan.

329 106 3/4

Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation

National Forest Development and Management Programme

Recurrent and Capital costs

11

5.6 Climate budget sHaRe witHiN miNistRies

The intra-ministry budget allocation indicated that theMoSTE has about 87.2 % of its annual budgetdedicated to climate change activities, followed by Ministry of Urban Development (64.9%), Ministry of Agriculture and (62.1%), and Ministry of Irrigation (49.4%). Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transportation have the lowest (1.3%) budget allocated for the climate change.

Table 5: Share of CC within Ministry’s Budget (in %)

Figure 4: Share of climate budget of ministries against total climate budget (%)

ministries 2011/12 (CPeiR) 2012/13 (this study)

MoI 41.2 17.2

MoE 53.7 24.6

MoAD 19.9 62.1

MFSC 41.5 45.2

MoSTE 96.6 87.2

PoPIT 17.9 1.3

MoUD 0.0 64.9

MoIr 47.9 49.4

MoFALD 13.2 3.6

6. Comparison of Climate Change Budget with CpeiR findings

Attempt was also made to compare climate budget allocation by various ministries as shown by the climate code with that of the findings of the CPEIR, whichestimated the climate budget based on expert analysis. The comparison showed differences under the Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development. In case of Ministry of Agriculture the share of climate change budget is found much higher (62.1%) compared to CPEIR findings (19.9%) and in case of MoFALD the climate budget is found relatively low (3.6%) compared to CPEIR findings (13.2%).The other ministries showing higher share of the climate change expenditure in the CPEIR study were the Ministry of Industry (41.2%), and Ministry of Energy (53.7%), which shows only 17.2 % and 24.6% budget in this study. Ministry of Irrigation (47.9%) does not show significant change (49.4%). In the same manner, the Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation also has by and large similar climate budget in both studies. Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transportation shows significant drop from 17.9 % to 1.3% in this study.

12

Of the total climate change budget, four ministries including the Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Urban Development, Ministry of Irrigation, and Ministry of Environment occupy about 84 % of the total climate change budget. The Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport had the lowest (1.5 %) share of the total climate change budget. The CPEIR had found that the four ministries i.e. Physical Planning and Works, Local Development, Irrigation, Environment had about 77% share of the total climate change budget. Almost all the climate related budget within the Ministry of Physical Planning and Works are shifted to the Ministry of Urban Affairs in the present context. Hence the only change is found within Ministry of Agriculture where more budget codes are found to be related the climate change and in the case of local development where about 6 budget codes or programs are not found in the present budget coding. Hence the share of Ministry of Agriculture is tremendous increased and the share of MoFALD is found to be drastically decreased.

Figure 5: Share of climate budget against total climate budget of ministries (in %)

6.1 NumbeR oF Climate PRogRammes

The review showed that a total of 99 budget heads are found to represent climate related programmes, whereas CPEIR had found only 83 such programmes.

Table 6: Number of budget heads tagged with climate code

ministry2011/12 (CPeiR) 2012/13 (this study) missing

from previous

New (added)

Highly mode low totalHighly

relevantmoderately total

Highly rel

mod. rel

MoI 0 2 0 2 2 2 0

MoE 0 6 1 7 7 7 0

MoAD 3 4 1 8 6 14 20 0 0 12

MFSC 13 7 20 16 7 23 2 0 5

MoSTE 11 1 12 12 0 12 2 2

PoPIT 1 0 1 0 0 0

MoUD 2 10 2 14 11 3 14 1 0 2

MoIr 3 6 9 10 5 15 3 6 3

MoFALD 1 8 2 11 5 0 5 6 0 0

Total 33 44 6 83 70 29 99 14 8 22

13

Table 7: Climate Budget by Group of Industry

CPEIR categorized the climate change budget under three category i.e. highly relevant, moderatelyrelevantandlowrelevant.However,theclimatebudgetcodingcategorizedonlytwoi.e.highlyrelevantand moderately relevant. The third category is the climates neutral which also include all recurrent costs. In the current climate change budget coding 30 budget items have been found to be new to that of the CPEIR findings. However, 14 budget codes which were in the CPEIR findings have been removed by the present coding. This is significant because of improved clarity in defining the climate activities which CPEIR did not have to define climate activities.

Inthepresentcodingthereisawell-placedbasistodefineclimateactivityandhasstreamlinedtheclimateprogrammes to a large extent. Perhaps based on this, the Ministry of Agriculture Development and the Ministry of Irrigation have added new budget items under climate activities. No change has been seen in the climate change budget codes under Ministry of Industry and Ministry of Energy. Whereas, under Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development a large number (6) of budget items have been removed in the present coding compared to CPEIR.

6.2 Climate budget by tHe CategoRy oF seRviCes aNd FuNCtioNs oF tHe goveRNmeNt

Table 6 and figure 6 shows the climate change budget by the category of service and functions of the government of Nepal. There are altogether 10 group of service and function areas of the Government of Nepal. Among them only four have climate related budget. Most of the climate change budget is on the area of economic affairs (71%) followed by housing and community services (26%). Only about 2 % is under environment protection and 1 percent is under general public service.

Table 7: Climate Budget by Group of Industry

group of industrydirect indirect

Recurrent capital total Rec cap total

01 General Public Service 400000 1038 401038 0 0 0

04 Economic Affairs 3941074 6134875 10075949 7282254 1945205 9227459

05 Environment Protection 157029 222388 379417 5969 45334 51303

06 Housing and community Service 4114844 3032619 7147463 0 0 0

total 8612947 9390920 18003867 7288223 1990539 9278762

01 General Public Service1%

04 Economic Affairs71%

05 Environment Protection

2%

06 Housing and community Service

26%

Fig 6: Climate budget by group of industry

14

6.3 loCal ComPoNeNt oF Climate CHaNge budget

Attempt is also made to find out the local component of the climate change budget. A total of 19budget heads out of 99 are identified as relevant to climate change applicable to local level activities. Accordingly, about 15.8 % of the total climate change budget is allocated towards the local level (Table 8). However, it did not include the block grant to local level. It needs to make a separate study regarding the climate change budget at the local government level. The CPEIR had estimated about 32 % of the total climate change budget as the local component. Now this share is decreased to nearly half due to the decrease in Budget code or programs itself. This shows some challenges to flow the funds at the local level as envisaged by the LAPA. Local component of CC are presented in table 8.

84.2% 15.8%

Total climate budget Climate budget at local level

Figure 8: Share of climate budget going to field (in %)

Table 8: Local component of CC

budget head Programmes amount (in Rs. ‘000)

3298013 Community Forest Development Program(Including Green Employment) 66160

3298014 Community Forest Development Program(Including Green Employment) 54400

3298043 District Soil Erosion Program 137524

3298044 District Soil Erosion Program 305336

3298053 CommunityDevelopmentandForest-WatershedProtectionProject 14936

3298054 CommunityDevelopmentandForest-WatershedProtectionProject 35120

3298063 Botanical Conservation & Park Development Project 8545

3298064 Botanical Conservation & Park Development Project 1938

3298073 BotanicalUtilization&MarketingProgram 8814

3298074 BotanicalUtilization&MarketingProgram 1321

3478023 Drinking Water and Sanitation Program 479512

3478024 Drinking Water and Sanitation Program 1895125

3658043 Rural Drinking Water & Sanitation Program 400000

3658044 Rural Drinking Water & Sanitation Program 1038

3658053 Rural Water Resource Management Project 311150

3658203 Environment Mgmt. Program at Local Level 179

3658213 Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Project in Western Nepal 266277

3658333 Community Irrigation Project 250000

3658334 Community Irrigation Project 79330

Total Local component 4316705

Total Climate Budget 27282629

Share of Local component to Total climate 15.8

15

7. observationsSince it was the first time that budget code for climate activities were being used for tracking purposes, it was certain to have gaps and shortcomings in the process developed. It was also certain to invite confusion at various levels of implementation. One common problem was to define climate activities. Each ministry has unique mandate with specific responsibility to deliver services, however, the broad guidelines and proceduredevelopedforclimatecodeissameforallministries,whichseemstohavecausedsomedifficultyin interpretation of criteria for defining climate activities.

There was some confusion about how much budget should be allocated to climate activities. This question is probably raised because in many activities of the government like education, health there is a set target to be met by 2015 under the MDGs. There is no such target to be met under climate activities. Of course, there are global commitments for Annex 1 countries to reduce carbon emissions, but there is no such commitmentfornon-annexcountrieslikeNepal.

The confusion is connected with targets of number of other sectors such as health and education under MDG. However, climate change does not have any MDG target and therefore there is no target as such to be met under climate activities.

Another area of concern is with the calculation of expenditure. The three categories of climate activities identified as (i) directly relevant to climate change, which carries above 60 % of the expenditure for the climate related activities, (ii) indirectly relevant, which carries 20-59 % expenditure for climate relatedactivities, and (iii) climate neutral with the expenditure which are below 20 % on climate change related activities or have no relation with climate change. However, some activities may have the expenditure just 60 % or 65 % or may be 90 % that we consider as 100 % for analytical purposes of directly relevant. Similar for others, if large amount will be excluded if the budget is large and it is below 20 % .

Some people also were confused because when we look at which activities are invested upon to help mitigate or adapt to climate change, there may be some activities which have negative impact on the climate change. For example cutting of trees for the electricity generation, making water pond or irrigation canals may have negative impact on climate change. Would that also need to be considered while coding was the question raised. The fact is that such issues on negative impact will be addressed by the EIA requirement as per legal provision.

8. ConclusionForm the rapid review carried out and a brief analysis of the findings it can be concluded that the budget codeishelpfultoanalyzeclimatebudgetallocationattheprogramlevel.Itappearsthatthecriteriaandmethods used are simple and user friendly. In the present context the share of climate change budget withlocalcomponentisrelativelylowi.eonlyabout15-16%.Itisachallengetoattainthecommitmentof diverting climate change budget up to 80% as spelled out in the climate policy. Even though most of the climate change related activities are concentrated at the local government level, it is still not clear how much budget is allocated at the local government level. This is one of the important issues to address in the future. Ministry of agriculture seems to have allocated much higher amount of budget to climate activities, followed by ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Irrigation. There is a need to increase the climate budget under the Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport and Ministry of Energy. Concerned ministries have made efforts to use climate code seems to have gained adequate experience in one year.

What is required is to develop detailed guidelines to suit each ministry defining details of the activities and areas for additional work for specific ministry. For example, MoLFALD may require a section on the roles of DDC and VDC in planning climate activities and allocating funds from various sources including INGOs to be tracked while other ministry may simply need definition of climate activities in more detail that explained by the quick reference guide at the moment.

16

9. RecommendationsAs the climate budget coding is a new concept and there are not any universal guidelines it is necessary to have a detail guideline with dedicated sections for each ministries. As ministries have different activities the guidelines must be different depending upon the activities of ministries.

There are some confusion on the existing climate coding guidelines which must be cleared by an workshop andpracticalexerciseeachyearregularlyfor3-4years.Sothatitwillbeclearforallconcernedofficials.

17

19

Appendix I

Climate Budget Code and Programs 2012/13

ClimateCode No Program Amount

1 3071013Environmental Sector Support Program including Energyprogram 6698

1 3071014Environmental Sector Support Program including Energy program 168

1 3071083Industrial Infrastructure Development Programme A(including Special Economic Zone) 5688

1 3071084Industrial Infrastructure Development Programme(including Special Economic Zone) 251546

1 3081023Irrigation & Water Resource Management Project (Water Energy) 3185

1 3081024Irrigation & Water Resource Management Project (Water Energy) 21388

1 3081033 Private Sector Participation in Electricity Development 5241 3081034 Private Sector Participation in Electricity Development 991 3081043 Saptakoshi Multi-Purpose Project 8751 3081044 Saptakoshi Multi-Purpose Project 657471 3081053 Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project 90001 3081054 Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project 239151 3081063 Hydroelectricity Project Study 9731 3081064 Hydroelectricity Project Study 206801 3081073 Standard for Hydroelectricity Project 4391 3081074 Standard for Hydroelectricity Project 13921 3081083 Power Development Fund 36931 3081084 Power Development Fund 70001 3121013 Agriculture Research and Development Fund 432121 3121014 Agriculture Research and Development Fund 3041 3121243 Integrated Water Resource Management Project 962711 3121293 Hill Leasehold Forestry Project (Livestock Development) 273101 3121294 Hill Leasehold Forestry Project (Livestock Development) 19871 3121413 Food Crisis Response Program 2211471 3121414 Food Crisis Response Program 829481 3121423 Sustainable Soil Management Project 35211 3121543 High Mountain Agri-business & Livelihood Improvement 132112

18

20

Project

1 3121544High Mountain Agri-business & Livelihood Improvement Project 51551

1 3291013 Forest Research & Survey Project 1160721 3291014 Forest Research & Survey Project 1222

1 3291023Herbs Development Program (Including Karnali Processing Center) 24384

1 3291024Herbs Development Program (Including Karnali Processing Center) 9291

1 3291033 Bio-Diversity Program 12201 3291063 National Forest Development & Management Program 83901 3291064 National Forest Development & Management Program 1465281 3291083 Leasehold Forest & Livestock Development Program 317941 3291084 Leasehold Forest & Livestock Development Program 363201 3291093 Forestry Conservation and Trees Improvement Centre 64331 3291094 Forestry Conservation and Trees Improvement Centre 70581 3291123 Botanical Study & Research Program 96991 3291124 Botanical Study & Research Program 41921 3291133 Watershed Management Project 34751 3291134 Watershed Management Project 25771 3291233 REDD-Forestry and Climate Change Cell 971451 3291243 President Chure Protection Program 141351 3291244 President Chure Protection Program 194152

1 3291283Strengthening Institutional Capacity of Mountain Protected Areas 13835

1 3291284Strengthening Institutional Capacity of Mountain Protected Areas 1579

1 3298013Community Forest Development Program(Including Green Employment) 66160

1 3298014Community Forest Development Program(Including Green Employment) 54400

1 3298043 District Soil Erosion Program 1375241 3298044 District Soil Erosion Program 305336

1 3298053Community Development and Forest-Watershed Protection Project 14936

1 3298054Community Development and Forest-Watershed Protection Project 35120

1 3298063 Botanical Conservation & Park Development Project 85451 3298064 Botanical Conservation & Park Development Project 1938

19

21

1 3298073 Botanical Utilization &Markeying Program 88141 3298074 Botanical Utilization &Markeying Program 13211 3311023 Hydrology Program 123231 3311024 Hydrology Program 97371 3311033 Meteorology Program 187451 3311034 Meteorology Program 50821 3311043 Weather Forecast Program 26571 3311044 Weather Forecast Program 10631 3311053 Flood Forecasting 37321 3311054 Flood Forecasting 227991 3311083 Alternate Energy Promotion Center 3851441 3311084 Alternate Energy Promotion Center 69001 3311093 Bio-Gas Production Program 3700001 3311103 Micro Hydro and Alternative Energy Program 1481510

1 3311113PDF - Community Micro-Hydro Rural Electrification Program 122273

1 3311114PDF - Community Micro-Hydro Rural Electrification Program 13113

1 3311183 Renewable Energy for Rural Livlihoods 52000

1 3311223Improved Rural Energy service programme Kabeli Transmission 36388

1 3311233 Project for Climate Resilience 17501 3311234 Project for Climate Resilience 33401 3311273 Nepal Climate Change Support Program 800001 3371963 Flood Damage Rehabilitation Project 98811 3371964 Flood Damage Rehabilitation Project 3883001 3471663 Environmental Sanitation Project 177881 3471664 Environmental Sanitation Project 1783881 3471673 National Information Management & Monitoring Project 60201 3471674 National Information Management & Monitoring Project 4001 3471683 Drinking Water Rehabilitation Program 4221 3471684 Drinking Water Rehabilitation Program 1161411 3471693 Deep Tube-well Project (Repair and Maintenance) 5111 3471694 Deep Tube-well Project (Repair and Maintenance) 222181 3471713 Drinking Water and Quality Improvement Program 9141 3471714 Drinking Water and Quality Improvement Program 1333711 3471733 Rural Drinking Water & Sanitation Fund 4605511 3471743 Small Town Drinking Water & Sanitation Project 63971 3471744 Small Town Drinking Water & Sanitation Project 6092

20

22

1 3471753 Rainwater Harvesting Project 5211 3471754 Rainwater Harvesting Project 288821 3471763 Melamchi Drinking Water Project 25339461 3471793 Second Small Town Drinking Water and Sanitation Project 546431 3471794 Second Small Town Drinking Water and Sanitation Project 8307901 3478023 Drinking Water and Sanitation Program 4795121 3478024 Drinking Water and Sanitation Program 18951251 3571023 Institutional Irrigation Development Program 112311 3571024 Institutional Irrigation Development Program 80901 3571033 Irrigation & Water Resource Management Project (Irrigation) 631611 3571034 Irrigation & Water Resource Management Project (Irrigation) 11296511 3571053 Irrigation Feasibility Study & Quality Construction Program 9661 3571054 Irrigation Feasibility Study & Quality Construction Program 26359

1 3571083Community Managed Irrigated Agriculture Sector & Water Resource Plan Preparatory Project 7827

1 3571084Community Managed Irrigated Agriculture Sector & Water Resource Plan Preparatory Project 691009

1 3571093 River Training Program 193141 3571094 River Training Program 15318731 3571103 Water Induced Disaster Control Technology Project 58951 3571104 Water Induced Disaster Control Technology Project 736901 3571143 Underground Shallow & Deep Tubewell Irrigation Project 154351 3571144 Underground Shallow & Deep Tubewell Irrigation Project 4065271 3571163 Deep & Sallow Tubewell Irrigation Project 2131 3571164 Deep & Sallow Tubewell Irrigation Project 4271 3571173 Surkhet Valley Irrigation Project 2241 3571174 Surkhet Valley Irrigation Project 1161 3571213 Babai Irrigation Project 62381 3571214 Babai Irrigation Project 4513101 3658043 Rural Drinking Water & Sanitation Program 4000001 3658044 Rural Drinking Water & Sanitation Program 10381 3658053 Rural Water Resource Management Project 3111501 3658203 Environment Mgmt. Program at Local Level 1791 3658213 Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Project in Western Nepal 2662771 3658333 Community Irrigation Project 2500001 3658334 Community Irrigation Project 793302 3121033 Special Program for Agricultural Production 50321192 3121043 Raising Income of Small & Medium Farmers Project 1639572 3121044 Raising Income of Small & Medium Farmers Project 31984

21

23

2 3121053 Agriculture Development Project (Janakpur) 221582 3121054 Agriculture Development Project (Janakpur) 371352 3121063 Sericulture Development Program 473842 3121064 Sericulture Development Program 101312 3121073 Horticulture Development Program 928542 3121074 Horticulture Development Program 171322 3121083 Potato, Vegetable & Spices Development Program 1161492 3121084 Potato, Vegetable & Spices Development Program 35582 3121093 Seeds Promotion and Quality Control Program 191852 3121094 Seeds Promotion and Quality Control Program 14872 3121103 Fishery Development Program 943242 3121104 Fishery Development Program 279662 3121113 Food Nutrition and Technology 750392 3121114 Food Nutrition and Technology 164002 3121123 Crop Protection and Pesticide Development 939092 3121124 Crop Protection and Pesticide Development 67402 3121143 Crop Development Program 501022 3121144 Crop Development Program 5648

2 3121173Community Managed Irrigated Agri. Sec. Project (Agriculture) 29895

2 3121174Community Managed Irrigated Agri. Sec. Project (Agriculture) 4828

2 3121363 Agriculture Research Program 9381002 3121523 Food Security Promotion Project 416302 3121524 Food Security Promotion Project 22122 3291043 Forest Training Center 209882 3291044 Forest Training Center 3242 3291103 Publicity Extension Program 3342 3291104 Publicity Extension Program 37122 3291113 Biodiversity Program for Terai and Siwalik Range 141152 3291114 Biodiversity Program for Terai and Siwalik Range 108382 3291143 Wildlife Conservation Program 814082 3291144 Wildlife Conservation Program 191502 3291153 Wildlife Conservation Project 1770762 3291154 Wildlife Conservation Project 41894

2 3291273Srengthening Regional Co-Operation for Wildlife Protection Project 67775

2 3291274Srengthening Regional Co-Operation for Wildlife Protection Project 61736

22

24

2 3291523 Multi Stakeholders Forestry Program 150002 3291524 Multi Stakeholders Forestry Program 3850002 3471773 Sewerage Construction and WasteTreatment Program 13252 3471774 Sewerage Construction and WasteTreatment Program 338422 3473083 DhobikhaolaCoridor Improvement Project 15792 3473084 DhobikhaolaCoridor Improvement Project 241128

2 3473553Bagmati Bishnumati Corridor Conservation Program-UNPark Development Committee 4644

2 3473554Bagmati Bishnumati Corridor Conservation Program-UNPark Development Committee 11492

2 3571013 System Management & Training Program 60542 3571014 System Management & Training Program 595

2 3571123Embankment Projects Under Indian Grant Assistance-including Bagmati, Kamala, Khando&LalBakaiya 2082

2 3571124Embankment Projects Under Indian Grant Assistance-including Bagmati, Kamala, Khando&LalBakaiya 758309

2 3571133 Underground Water Resource Development Board 547482 3571134 Underground Water Resource Development Board 11400

2 3571193Rehabilitation and Management Transfer of Large Scale Irrigation Project and 10876

2 3571194Rehabilitation and Management Transfer of Large Scale Irrigation Project and 42857

2 3571203 Bagmati Irrigation Project 134142 3571204 Bagmati Irrigation Project 203041

government of nepal national planning commission poverty ...€¦ · review of climate budget code...

Documents