global warming - kammen

7/29/2019 Global Warming - Kammen

1/3

Dear Dr. Kammen,

I have read several of your papers you published representing the

Energy Resources Group and I am aware that you are a steadfast proponent

for proactive strategy development to address the "alarming" issue of globalwarming. I have done research on the findings of scientists on both sides of the

fence on this issue and I do believe, with respect to your obvious intellect and

personal opinion, that climate change is in fact a myth. A myth that has been

constructed to scare groups and individuals into altering their behaviour on a

fundamental level, a method of social control transcending age, race, religion,

social or financial status. A myth which has precipitated reactions from

governments and policy makers across the globe, precipitating the evolutions

of systems of laws and tiers of beaurocracy that have been put in place for the

purpose of extracting assets from the poor and distributing them to faceless

government branches and corporations whose task is "reducing carbon

pollution. So called experts scaring the uniformed into supporting regulation of

their freedom in an attempt to abate a disaster that the scientific experts of

our time arent even sure will eventuate.

I will begin with a reiteration of my hypothesis; global warming is a myth. This

is to say, the presenting truth contained within the FACTS derived from

research and data collated and published by field experts of all persuasions,

that there is no proof (FACTS supporting a theory) that Global warming is

either true in the first instance, or that should it occur would it have any

noticeable (let alone negative) effect on the ecological systems of the planet.

The systematic monitoring of global temperature, weather patterns, natural

disasters and precipitation began just over 100 years ago. Much has been

learnt but there is far more to be discovered in this area than is currently

known. What is required to accurately assess the issue of global warming is

an independent grant funded program with the task of gathering and collating

data from around the globe in metropolitan, suburban, rural and uninhabitedareas (including the oceans). This program is simply for the purpose of

gathering data and has no other function. With decades of this accurate and

impartial data at its disposal the scientific fraternity would be far more capable

of assessing the existence of global warming and its possible impacts. Currently

situation with global warming research is many different groups all using

different sources and methods making a plethora of discoveries, all concealing

and protecting their data and research (many meteorological data collection

facilities are military). There is little to no cooperation or common conclusion

concerning even the simplest element of the Global warming theory: How


2/3

much CO2 is produced by human activity. If we are not even able to assess the

amount of pollution that is being produced, how are we able to develop a

complex theory based on the impact of this pollution, or develop policies to

reduce the amount of pollution. We need to incubate and care for the egg

(gather accurate and relevant data) and allow it to hatch (using the datagathered form an impartial and accurate opinion), rather than sewing pieces of

chicken together (gathering all different sorts of data and partially formed

theories and cramming them into one "global warming theory"), zapping it

with a car battery and creating a "Franken Chicken" (Gathering support from

governments and corporations and waging war on CO2).

One cannot be certain of the motivation of the groups behind the perpetration

of this deception. The global nature of the topic impedes most efforts to

isolate a particular group or common thread linking the major proponents of

the theory, other than a mutually shared appreciation of specific analysis of

certain key world events and corresponding scientific theories that are signs

posts pointing towards the possibility of a warming planet. What is certain is

the level of influence these groups and individuals hold within our parliaments,

universities, public service sectors, schools and publishing companies. What we

are seeing is an application of a social control mechanism applied from a great

height with cooperation from the media, parliament and a number of

influential groups and individuals. Some have described it as an apocalyptic

fear campaign with the purpose of controlling the individuals within our

society with the fear of a crisis that would threaten their way of life; A

Doomsday Clock. This could have any number of effects ranging from complex

to baseline behaviour manipulation. Simple reactions emerging from the

mechanism could include unification of the global society against the threat (in

this case pollution and/or carbon emissions) which we know is already

occurring. Another more complex effect of this type of social control is the

increased pressure on individual obedience and a conditioning of the socially

contracted to participate in the capitalists regimes efforts to open up newmarkets exploiting fear of the new threat. This resulting pressure is exerted

upon all classes however extends more to the upper working classes who

operate on a level incorporating social concern and a focus on the wellbeing of

the society. These are the individuals from whom political, social and financial

revolution spreads; the educated working class who are dissatisfied with the

current establishment. As the focus is shifted from problem inherent within

the establishment to the task at hand, Winding back the Doomsday Clock, the

establishment consolidates its position. The irony of the situation is that the

great minds whose task it is to drive the public to progress are complicit within


3/3

the Global Warming deception. Instead of calling for reforms we are being

redirected to a false threat to our freedom. The real threat to our freedom is

the deification of atmospheric health and the consequential regulation of our

rights.

Global warming is a myth. Like all good myths it has a great enemy (CO2), a

heaven (a future without Hawaii underwater) and a hell (a future with Hawaii

underwater). All that remains is the role of the saviour. Who will rescue the

whole world from itself? Like most myths, Global warming theory exists to

control those who believe it. However as the myth grows to a religious scale it

begins to push the envelope and impact on those who dont believe it. We now

have an opinion impacting on policy and good governance. Church and state

are separate but there is a new player; Science. Will we need to take steps in

the future to separate State from Science? What lessons will we learn in the

next few decades about separation of powers and the impact that unproven

theories can have on our society. I hope that this letter opens up a wondrous

dialogue between the two of us, Dr. Kammen. Please do not take any of my

assertions as insult as that is surely not my intent. I await your response with

great anticipation as I long to hear you explain your point of view in relation to

the issues I have raised.

global warming - kammen

Documents