global exploration review

23
woodmac.com Trusted Intelligence Global exploration review APPEX, London, March 2019

Upload: others

Post on 13-May-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Global exploration review

woodmac.comTrusted Intelligence

Global exploration review

APPEX, London, March 2019

Page 2: Global exploration review

1. Exploration trends

2. 2018 exploration results

3. Outlook for 2019 and beyond

Exploration results and outlook

Page 3: Global exploration review

Exploration wells Success ratesExploration spend

Context: exploration was struggling with dwindling volume & value

Global conventional exploration results 2007-2016

Source: Wood Mackenzie Exploration Service.

Large and giant discoveries Full cycle returnsVolumes discovered

0

25

50

75

100

0

25

50

75

100

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Spend p

er w

ell (U

S$M

)

Spend (

US

$bn)

E&A spend Spend per well

0

500

1,000

1,500

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015N

um

ber

of W

ells

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Success r

ate

s (

%)

Commercial Overall

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Bill

ion b

oe

Liquid Gas

0

10

20

30

40

50

Giant > 500 mmboe Large >100 mmboe

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Dis

cove

ries

0%

5%

10%

15%

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

IRR

(%

)

Page 4: Global exploration review

Poor recent exploration results impact oil supply

Production is comparable to pre-crash volumes only in the first few years from discovery

Source: Wood Mackenzie Upstream Data Tool

Total commercial liquids production each year from discovery

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Liq

uid

s p

rod

ucti

on

(m

illio

n b

/d)

Rebased year from discovery

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017In the short term, production forecast from post-crash discoveries per year is

comparable to production from pre-crash discoveries

Post-crash exploration is forecast to deliver less

production per year

2010 – Buzios, Johan Sverdrup

2011 – Libra, Johan Castberg

Page 5: Global exploration review

Exploration’s return to profitability from 2017

Source: Wood Mackenzie

New discoveries add 11+ billion barrels of oil and 6+ billion boe gas

Blocks A6/A7Gorgon Snoek

Zama

Horseshoe

Eridu

Halifax

Yakaar

Neptune

C. Olginskoye-1

Whale

Ballymore

Ruby

Positive economics

• Discoveries worth US$30 billion

• Value creation US$8bn+

• IRR > 10%

Legend

2017 gas discovery

2017 oil discovery

Bozhong 19-6

Page 6: Global exploration review

1. Exploration trends

2. 2018 exploration results

3. Outlook for 2019 and beyond

Exploration results and outlook

Page 7: Global exploration review

More success in 2018, including some high value discoveries

Source: Wood Mackenzie

Ivela-1

Stony Hill-16604/5-1

DoverMC 612 #1BP1 (G33166)

Ranger-1Pacora-1Longtail-1Hammerhead-1Pluma-1

Boudji-1

Calypso-1

Pilipili-1

6506/11-10

Epu

Kalimba-1

Dorado-1

Guanxuma-1

Glendronach

Discoveries > 50 mmboe

2018 gas discovery

2018 oil discovery

North ObskoyeNyakhartinskoye

Triton

Timi-1

Page 8: Global exploration review

ExxonMobil’s Pluma is the tenth discovery from 12 wildcats

Stabroek licence, Guyana Guyana production outlook by field

Guyana: volumes now > 5 billion boe, value > US$25 billion

Source: Wood Mackenzie

0

200

400

600

800

1000

20

20

20

25

20

30

20

35

20

40

20

45

20

50

Pro

du

ctio

n (

'00

0 b

/d)

Phase 6 - Ranger

Phase 5 - Hammerhead

Phase 4 - Longtail, Pluma & Turbot

Phase 3 - Liza, Liza Deep, Pacora & Payara

Phase 2 - Liza & Snoek

Phase 1 - Liza

Page 9: Global exploration review

Russia: Yamal gas giants underpin future Arctic LNG projects

Source: Wood Mackenzie

North Obskoye11.3 tcf

Nyakhartinskoye2.3 tcf

Page 10: Global exploration review

Australia: Dorado discovery

Source: Wood Mackenzie

Source: Carnarvon Petroleum Ltd, ‘Dorado-1 Oil Discovery 18 July 2018

125 mmboe (gas/condensate)

Caley Member Sst

22-26%

171 mmbbl oil + 552 bcfgas discovery

Offshore

88 metre WD

Location

Santos (80%), Carnarvon (20%)

Partners

Pre-drillestimate

Key Facts:

Target

Technical Risk – EV2

Status

• Promising light oil discovery. The well intersected an 80 metre net oil column with excellent permeability and porosity characteristics

• Currently there are no offshore developments in the Roebuck basin

• The well is located less than 20km and up-dip of the successful Roc-1 and Roc-2 wells

• Multiple secondary targets (Crispin & Milne Members) also oil-bearing

A U S T R A L I AA U S T R A L I A

PhoenixSouth

Nebo

RocWA-437-PQuadrantEne

119°E118°E

18

°30

'S1

9°S

19

°30

'S2

0°S

0 10050km

Source: Wood Mackenzie, Esri

AUSTRALIA

Page 11: Global exploration review

Progress on many fronts is driving exploration recovery

Source: Wood Mackenzie

“How exploration can fix its broken economics” (published 2016)

Reduce exploration

costs by >50%

Reduce development

costs by >25%

+Refocus

portfolios to avoid

complexity

+Avoid tough fiscal terms

+Reload acreage at low cost

+ Exploration returns up=

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Co

nve

nti

on

al

ex

plo

rati

on

IR

R (

%)

Page 12: Global exploration review

Exploration is now back in the black

Reduced costs and quicker commercialisation of discoveries are now creating value

Source: Wood Mackenzie Exploration Service . Value creation and returns at US$65/bbl Brent.

Exploration industry value creation Exploration industry returns

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Va

lue

cre

atio

n (

US

$B

n)

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

IRR

(%

)

Page 13: Global exploration review

13

woodmac.com

Deepwater sweet spots a critical part of exploration’s recovery

Key to the sweet spots: exceptional reservoirs at unexceptional depths

Source: Wood Mackenzie. Chart includes deepwater oil developments >50 mmboe achieving FID since 2012 or expected in the next few years. Bubble size represents full field reserves. Reservoir depth based on typical development well TD. Development well EUR is based on field reserves divided by well count including production and injection wells.

Deepwater oil FIDs add over 30 billion boe since 2012

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Reserv

oir d

epth

(km

)

Development well EUR (mmboe)

FID 2012-2017 Probables

Brazil & Guyana

US GoM

West Africa

Threshold ofcommerciality at US$50 oil

Page 14: Global exploration review

14

woodmac.com

New frontiers also critical to exploration’s recovery

Half of recent exploration volumes found before first production in the play

Source: Wood Mackenzie Exploration Service

Proportion of new fields volumes discovered by play maturity

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Pro

port

ion o

f vo

lum

es d

iscove

red

Frontier Unproven Frontier Proven Early Emerging Late Emerging

Established Early Mature Late Mature

Page 15: Global exploration review

1. Exploration trends

2. 2018 exploration results

3. Outlook for 2019 and beyond

Exploration results and outlook

Page 16: Global exploration review

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

US

$/b

oe

Cash margin

Tax

Opex

Capex

Exploration

Revenue

Upstream cash margins looking strong

Outlook at US$60 Brent as good as any time in past 20 years

Source: Wood Mackenzie

Majors’ upstream Cash Flow per barrel produced Cash Margin v Brent

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Bre

nt O

il P

rice (

US

$/b

bl)

Cash M

arg

in (

US

$/b

oe)

cash margin - high

Cash margin

Brent - High

Brent

Page 17: Global exploration review

But exploration budgets will remain flat in real terms

Activity may edge up with further improvement on costs

Source: Wood Mackenzie

Global Upstream Capex

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

US

$ b

illio

n Exploration

US Onshore

Probable

Under Development

Onstream

0

Page 18: Global exploration review

High-impact exploration is now a very exclusive club

Led by the Majors, selected NOCs and a handful of independents

Source: Wood Mackenzie Exploration Service

2017 volumes by company 2018 volumes by company

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Exx

on

Mo

bil

To

tal

En

i

Equ

ino

r

Sh

ell

Vo

lum

es d

isco

vere

d (

bn

bo

e) Gas

Oil

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

BP

Ch

evr

on

Exx

on

Mo

bil

Sh

ell

To

tal

En

i

Oth

ers

Gas

Oil7 Majors

22%

Top ten

60%

7 Majors

35%

Top ten

76%

Page 19: Global exploration review

Source: Wood Mackenzie

Planned Drill

Drilling

Primary hydrocarbon phase - Gas

Primary hydrocarbon phase - Oil

Top 20 wildcats to watch – more deepwater and frontiers in 2019

Jethro

Venus-1

Block 48-1

Peroba-1

Brulpadda-1RE

Cholula-1

VinstraBlackrock

Glaucus-1

Khan Khubrat-1

Nour-1

Mailu-1Etzil-1

KBD-2X

Nasua-1

Kingsholm-1

Hazri-3

Alto Cabo Frio O

Kekra-1

Mondi

Page 20: Global exploration review

Key exploration themes

A smaller, more profitable industry

1. Majors continue to dominate

2. Little sign of inflation

3. Most budgets stay cautious, but will

some break ranks?

4. Latin and North American deepwater

and frontier basins drive success

5. Average full cycle returns well above

10%

Page 21: Global exploration review

Dr Andrew Latham

Vice President, Global Exploration

Biography Connect with Andrew

Andrew has over 25 years experience assisting majors and independents in the development of their exploration strategy and currently works on Wood Mackenzie’s Exploration Research. He provides analysis of exploration economics, strategies and industry trends.

Andrew previously led the Exploration Strategy offering within the Upstream Consulting business. He worked with clients to help optimize their investments in petroleum exploration and advised on strategy, process, opportunity characterization and evaluation. As part of this offering, Andrew directed Wood Mackenzie’s series of multi-client projects on exploration, deepwater and Arctic themes.

Andrew has been with Wood Mackenzie’s energy team since 1995. Until the end of 2001, he managed the team responsible for Sub-Saharan Africa research products and consultancy, undertaking a range of market analysis and regional strategy projects.

He started his career in 1990 as an international new ventures geologist with Ranger Oil. Later, as Ranger focused on West Africa, he became project geologist for Angola.

Andrew graduated from Imperial College, London, with a BSc Honours degree in Geology, and holds a PhD in Geology from University College, Cardiff.

+44 131 243 4408

@AndrewLatham_WM

[email protected]

Page 22: Global exploration review

22

woodmac.com

Disclaimer

Strictly Private & Confidential

� These materials, including any updates to them, are published by and remain subject to the copyright of the Wood Mackenzie group ("Wood Mackenzie"), and are made available to clients of Wood Mackenzie under terms agreed between Wood Mackenzie and those clients. The use of these materials is governed by the terms and conditions of the agreement under which they were provided. The content and conclusions contained are confidential and may not be disclosed to any other person without Wood Mackenzie's prior written permission. Wood Mackenzie makes no warranty or representation about the accuracy or completeness of the information and data contained in these materials, which are provided 'as is'. The opinions expressed in these materials are those of Wood Mackenzie, and nothing contained in them constitutes an offer to buy or to sell securities, or investment advice. Wood Mackenzie's products do not provide a comprehensive analysis of the financial position or prospects of any company or entity and nothing in any such product should be taken as comment regarding the value of the securities of any entity. If, notwithstanding the foregoing, you or any other person relies upon these materials in any way, Wood Mackenzie does not accept, and hereby disclaims to the extent permitted by law, all liability for any loss and damage suffered arising in connection with such reliance.

Copyright © 2019, Wood Mackenzie Limited. All rights reserved. Wood Mackenzie is a Verisk business.

Page 23: Global exploration review

Wood Mackenzie™, a Verisk business, is a trusted intelligence provider, empowering decision-makers with unique insight on the world’s natural resources. We are a leading research and consultancy business for the global energy, power and renewables, subsurface, chemicals, and metals and mining industries. For more information visit: woodmac.com

WOOD MACKENZIE is a trademark of Wood Mackenzie Limited and is the subject of trademark registrations and/or applications in the European Community, the USA and other countries around the world.

EuropeAmericasAsia PacificEmailWebsite

+44 131 243 4400+1 713 470 1600+65 6518 [email protected]