global diet change: implications for agriculture and nutrition

16
Global Diet Change Implications for Agriculture and Nutrition Mark W. Rosegrant Director Siwa Msangi Senior Research Fellow Environment and Production Technology Division

Upload: international-food-policy-research-institute-ifpri

Post on 18-Nov-2014

1.216 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Mark Rosegrant 2020 Conference on "Leveraging Agriculture for Improving Nutrition and Health" February 11, 2011

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

Global Diet Change Implications for Agriculture and Nutrition

Mark W. RosegrantDirector

Siwa MsangiSenior Research Fellow

Environment and Production Technology Division

Page 2: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Projected Food Prices: Increasing Scarcity

0

50

100

150

200

250

Wheat Maize Rice

2010 2050 no CC 2050 CC

Based on IFPRI IMPACT Scenarios

Notes: 2010 = 100; CC = climate change

Page 3: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Non-food Competitors in Production

Demand for biofuels and bioenergy

Emissions mitigation and carbon sequestration

Conservation and biodiversity

Food

Water

Energy

Land

Page 4: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Agricultural Growth and Food Security

Supply drivers

Climate change

Water and land scarcity

Science and technology policy

Investment in agricultural research

Policy and governance reform

Demand drivers

Population:9 billion people in 2050

Income growth: Africa, not just Asia and

Latin America

Urbanization: in 2008 50% urban in 2050 78% urban

Page 5: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Major Consequences

Change in diets to convenience foods, fast foods

Increased consumption of fruits and vegetables

Higher food energy, more sugar, fats and oils

Rapid growth in meat consumption and demand for grains for feed

Half of growth in grain demand will be for livestock

Intense pressure on land and water

Page 6: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Dietary and Food System Approaches to Improving Nutrition

Reducing post harvest losses

• 10% for grains; 25% for perishables

• Economic recoverability limited

Wasting less food

• 20% wastage in households

Consuming fish from sustainable stocks

Reducing consumption of meat and dairy products

Page 7: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Key Question

Page 7

Would reduction in meat consumption in richer countries improve food security in developing countries?

Page 8: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Dietary Change Is Not Easy

CAMPAIGNS

Advocacy, educational, and public relations campaigns

PROMOTE LOW-MEAT MENUS

Cafeterias, schools, hospitals, and other public-sector institutions

POLICIES

Taxation and subsidy policies to increase the cost of meat compared to other food products

Page 9: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.orgSource: IMPACT model projections

Per Capita Meat ConsumptionLess meat in rich countries = more in developing countries

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 2000 2030 baseline 2030 HIC+China/Brazil (low meat)

China Brazil High-income countries

Sub-Saharan Africa

Developing minus China &

Brazil

Kilo

gram

per

cap

ita

(per

yea

r)

Page 10: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Feed Demand for Coarse Grains

Less meat = Lower feed-grain demand

Source: IMPACT model projections

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

China Brazil Developing minus China &

Brazil

High Income World

Mill

ion

s o

f m

etri

c to

ns

2000 2030 baseline 2030 HIC+China/Brazil (low meat)

Page 11: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

World Prices of GrainsReduced feed grain demand = Lower grain prices

Source: IMPACT model projections

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Rice Wheat Maize

2000

2030 baseline

US$

pe

r m

etr

ic t

on

Page 12: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Per Capita Food Grain Consumption

Source: IMPACT model projections

Lower grain prices increases demand

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

High-income countries Sub-Saharan Africa Developing minus China & Brazil

Kilo

gram

pe

r ca

pit

a (p

er

year

)

2000 2030 baseline 2030 HIC+China/Brazil (low meat)

Page 13: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Per Capita Calorie Availability

Source: IMPACT model projections

Lower prices increase calorie access

2,000

2,200

2,400

2,600

2,800

3,000

3,200

3,400

3,600

China Brazil Developing minus China &

Brazil

High income

Kca

l per

cap

ita

(per

day

)

2000 2030 baseline 2030 HIC+China/Brazil (low meat)

Page 14: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Child Malnutrition

Small improvement

Source: IMPACT model projections

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

All Sub-Saharan Africa All Asia Developing countries

Mill

ion

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

0-5

2000 2030 baseline 2030 HIC+China/Brazil (low meat)

Page 15: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Lower Meat Production Saves Large Areas of Pasture and Cropland

Source: IMPACT model projections

0

50

100

150

200

250

China Brazil Developing minus China &

Brazil

High income World

Are

a sa

ved

(m

illio

ns

of h

ect

are

s)

HIC only HIC + China Brazil

Page 16: Global diet change: Implications for agriculture and nutrition

www.ifpri.org

Conclusions

Halving of meat consumption in richer countries has

• small nutrition benefits in developing countries

• big land saving impacts

Dietary change is a useful tool for improved food security and nutrition

But transformative progress requires much broader investment in agricultural and rural development