glendale bl hyperion ave complex of bridges improvement ... · pdf...
TRANSCRIPT
7;77 r.44 • •
4111.-7
GLENDALE BL - HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ENGINEERING BUREAU OF ENGINEERING Bridge Improvement Division
June 3, 2015
rririnin C.:Tv Or LOS ANGELES
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ENGINEERING
71171111T1CITY OF LOS ANGELES
BUREAU OF ENGINEERINGBridge Improvement Division
June 3, 2015
GLENDALE BL - HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
rirdirriisl LaS_AANGELES
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Project Limits
Glendale BI - Southbound Gienfeliz BI
Hyperion Ave Glendale BI - Northbound
ENGINEERING
71111111 III
CITY OF LOS ANGELES.
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Project LimitsEttrick St
Waverly Dr
ENGINEERING
Glendale BI - Southbound
Hyperion Ave
Glenfeliz BI
511141t7 kik". .
• 4'1111 4 16.4.
Glendale BI - Northbound
GLENDALE BL - HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Needs and Deficiencies • Bridges are seismically deficient — Caltrans Bridge Evaluation -
Category 1 Bridges
• Glendale Boulevard Bridges over the LA River has substandard
sidewalks, no bike lanes
• 1-5 Off-Ramp
• LA River Bike Path Access only from Glendale BI Southbound
• Historic restoration needed
• Hyperion Ave — No continuous, ADA-compliant sidewalks through
entire project area, no bike lanes
ENGINEERING
4
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Needs and Deficiencies• Bridges are seismically deficient — Caltrans Bridge Evaluation -
Category 1 Bridges
• Glendale Boulevard Bridges over the LA River has substandardsidewalks, no bike lanes
• 1-5 Off-Ramp
• LA River Bike Path Access only from Glendale BI Southbound
• Historic restoration needed
• Hyperion Ave — No continuous, ADA-compliant sidewalks throughentire project area, no bike lanes
ENGINEERING
minimCITY OF LOS ANGELES
4
1 11111
11011111 11111111 11111041 11
•
filll ENGINEERING
11111111P 5
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Seismic Strengthening
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Seismic Strengthening
1111111101111111111111111111111‘41it,1111111111TPENGINEERING
rirrIPTICITY OF LOS ANGELES
Widen by 8 feet
Widen by 8 feet
6
ENGINEERING IYME
MITI ICI
IGELE 5
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Glendale BI Widening
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Glendale BI Widening
k1171\
ENGINEERINGME111=MIIMMIli
Min.1111
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Widen by 8 feet
6
Widen by 8 feet
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Realigned 1-5 Northbound Off Ramp &
LA River Bike Path Access
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Realigned 1-5 Northbound Off Ramp &
LA River Bike Path Access
£ Part f 71*-0.
a PM 4 P(R 7
PER 7
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Pedestrian Bridge over LA River
fawn; EP g a!ra 2 rara 44IW 4
i••02EME MMI".."1"1"1""N"Illiai""" ft1 MUIV1,7
_,-(0
.APPROA. OL
ViDGE ELEVATION
REP r'(cJ PIER
,cP BRIDGE L.YOui
Vertkd Nesp., Awe, ts,
;7„
.• • .441.4 ; arr.g /Pt. P.
crud. 5'441
V's.. St.* St. Roi..;
*9 •
LO,•. rep
T.. Ste. &Am Mem Typ
~fby 9J (New*, Ifte•
i I
P.I7;!ETPIAIJ PP.r IF A
e
8
SEC7ION ;//' 1.-e•
ENGINEERING
rrrifriln CITY OF LOS ANGELES
1
1.101,441,11e1
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Pedestrian Bridge over LA River
g M. 2
ARLII14,7 Mr.
.r. •
PUT
E S
Pk7?
wS'ool
i'TCe Slm413CO.4 Seely 4.4...• •e TO ----a
rufse Sins 1Wip
IMO
5fipcc._ELEyi LmQri,
.___GINISaftIVE.11.113ALOBIDGE w.
MIR
Wrked NowndPap fp
. DePing
'71rD"' •
6lon, an,"
•ek. SEC710r1
ENGINEERING
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
*Pro-4PCfeppal Epp
PEA 4
BPIDGE LA, 0",.'1
FICA
P4DEFTRIA1 PP'r
e
151
VS U
IIIMOI• /FEU
PE
8
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Infiltration Basin at Sunnynook Park
LAD, • 111
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Infiltration Basin at Sunnynook Park
1-013111
ENGINEERING11i111111
7111 III
CITY OF LOS ANGELE9
1929 Balustrades
Proposed Balustrades
ENGINEERING
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Historic Restoration
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CtTY OF LOS ANGELES
I
Existing 2-ft curb
ENGINEERING
Fr In C•F 1_3S A%GEL
11
Existing 2-ft curb
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Existing Conditions/Safety Concerns
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECTExisting Conditions/Safety Concerns
ENGINEERING
PrIrT11111CITY OF LOS ANGELES
11
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Pedestrian Volumes — March 2014
12-hour pedestrian volumes
• 82 pedestrians on west side + 24 pedestrian on east side
• Total = 106 pedestrians in 12 hours
• Higher volume of pedestrians on the west side ENGINEERING
Mil!T1M lc ANGELES
12
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Pedestrian Volumes March 2014
ENGINEERING
MIT10111CITY OF LOS ANGELES
12-hour pedestrian volumes
• 82 pedestrians on west side + 24 pedestrian on east side
• Total = 106 pedestrians in 12 hours
• Higher volume of pedestrians on the west side
12
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bicyclists Volumes — March 2014
#
Wrong-way roe g (possibly on sidewalk)
NB Bicyclists
12-hour bicyclists volumes
• 49 bicyclists on west side + 36 bicyclists on east side
• Total = 85 bicyclists in 12 hours 4441-*1.1Fr{-7,I,
" 4)-111111D • irri
ENGINEERING
111
13 CITY •IV:r=itLES
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bicyclists Volumes — March 2014
ENGINEERING•11111011i1
r9rPirni III
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Wrong-way riding(possibly on sidewalk)
NB Bicyclists
12-hour bicyclists volumes
• 49 bicyclists on west side + 36 bicyclists on east side
• Total = 85 bicyclists in 12 hours
mg. Wrong-way ridingMa. (possibly on sidewalk)
13
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Comparison of 12-Hour Volumes on Hyperion Ave
West side Hyperion Ave -Volumes
East side Hyperion Ave -Volumes
Total Volumes
Pedestrian
82
24
106
Bicyclists
49
36
85
Vehicles
9,973
9,025 18,998
Source of Information: Transmittal #1, Appendix F, Traffic Studies, Technical Memorandum #1, Appendices A & B
14
ENGINEERING 171171111,1
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Comparison of 12-Hour Volumes on Hyperion Ave
West sideHyperion Ave -
Volumes
East sideHyperion Ave -
Volumes
Total Volumes
Pedestrian
Bicyclists
82
49
24
36
106
85
Vehicles 9,973 9,025 18,998
ENGINEERING
7711711111!TY OF LOS ANGELES!
Source of Information: Transmittal #1, Appendix F, Traffic
Studies, Technical Memorandum #1, Appendices A & B
14
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CEQA Environmental Review
• Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)
prepared in 2013. Findings:
• Biological Resources
• Historic Resources
• Archaelogical Resources
• Traffic
• IS/MND circulated for public review and comment in fall
2013 (extended).
• A community workshop and a public hearing were held
in September and October 2013.
ENGINEERING
15 CITY OF LO ANCALES
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CEQA Environmental Review
• Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)
prepared in 2013. Findings:
• Biological Resources
• Historic Resources
• Archaelogical Resources
• Traffic
• IS/MND circulated for public review and comment in fall
2013 (extended).
• A community workshop and a public hearing were held
ENGINEERING11•••••••••••
17111111 ►►►
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
in September and October 2013.
15
ENGINEERING
CITY OF = 7.
III 16
14.5' 11'
69'
.1-1" BRIDGE
1 1' 1.6
BRIDGE -I
NORTHBOUND
CONCRE BARRIER
TE CONCRETE
1.51±
HISTORIC REPLICA RAIL
I
HYPERION AVENUE VIADUCT OVER 1-5, RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND L.A. RIVER (LOOKING NORTH)
NO SCALE
1.5'±
HISTORIC REPLICA RAIL
7' SIDEWALK
PIPE RAIUNG
•..3.71,
1.5' 14.5'
SOUTHBOUND
BARRIER TE
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Published IS/MND Cross Section for Hyperion Ave
• Four vehicular traffic lanes with shoulders, sidewalk on west
side, continuous concrete median barrier (Public Hearing
held October 28,2013)
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Published IS/MND Cross Section for Hyperion Ave
• Four vehicular traffic lanes with shoulders, sidewalk on westside, continuous concrete median barrier (Public Hearingheld October 28,2013)
1.5'±
HISTORICREPLICA RAIL
ENGINEERING
Mme. III
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
7' SIDEWALK
PRANCING
1.5' 14.5'
69'
.1-1* BRIDGE
1'
11' 1.5' C. 11' 14.5' 1.51±
SOUTHBOUND
BRIDGE
BARRIERc,Q_NCREET
NORTHBOUND
BACONCRRIERRETE
BARRIER
HYPERION AVENUE VIADUCT OVER I-5, RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND L.A. RIVER(LOOKING NORTH)
NO SCALE
16
AO,
HISTORICREPLICA RAIL
TRAVEL LANES SHARED USE PATH
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) • A Citizens Advisory Committee was formed and five meetings were
held between December 2013 and December 2014.
• During this time, four design options for the Hyperion Ave segment were considered:
• Four vehicular traffic lanes, shared-use paths on both sides for pedestrians and bicyclists (Exhibit 1A, Transmittal 3)
69'±
-REPLICA RAILING CRASH EXHIBIT 7
BARRIER CRASH
BARRIER
REPLICA 1.5'± RAILING
S 1.5' •
8' 11' 10 5' 4' 10 5' 8'
SHARED TRAVEL LANES MEDIAN USE PATH
17
ENGINEERING'
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)• A Citizens Advisory Committee was formed and five meetings were
held between December 2013 and December 2014.
• During this time, four design options for the Hyperion Ave segmentwere considered:
• Four vehicular traffic lanes, shared -use paths on both sidesfor pedestrians and bicyclists (Exhibit 1A, Transmittal 3)
ENGINEERING
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
1.5'tCRASH ZAHIBE::
BARRIER
69'±
REPLICARAILING• 1.
8' 11' 10 5'
SHARED TRAVEL LANESUSE PATH
MEDIAN
REPLICA CRASH
BARRIER RAILING 1
10.5' 11' 8'
TRAVEL LANES SHAREDUSE PATH
1.5'±
17
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
• Four vehicular traffic lanes, sidewalks on west side only,
bike lanes both sides (Exhibit 1, Transmittal 3)
SIDEWALK L
BIKE LANE
CRASH BARRIER
N.B. TRAVEL LANE #1 N.B. TRAVEL LANE # 2 BIKE LANE CRASH
BARRIER
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
• Four vehicular traffic lanes, sidewalks on west side only,bike lanes both sides (Exhibit 1, Transmittal 3)
1.5'
.I.
5,— 5'
'SIDEWALK [ BIKE LANE
CRASHBARRIER
11'
S.B. TRAVEL LANE # 2
69'±
BRIDGE\
11'
S.B. TRAVEL LANE # 1
11'(aglIrtia ) N.B. TRAVEL LANE #1
18
1.5'1
1.5'
11' 5'
N.B. TRAVEL LANE # 2 BIKE LANECRA
mt:as:2M
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
• Three vehicular traffic lanes (one lane northbound, two lanes southbound),
sidewalk on west side only, bike lanes both sides, bike lane buffer both sides (Exhibit 2, Transmittal 3)
CLB RIDGE
11' 6' , 12' 3' S.B. TRAVEL LANE # 1 r .,.,p,,T,4„,, N.B. TRAVEL LANE # 1 91.1F.FR
7' SIDEWALK
5' BIKE LANE
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
• Three vehicular traffic lanes (one lane northbound, two lanes southbound),sidewalk on west side only, bike lanes both sides, bike lane buffer both sides(Exhibit 2, Transmittal 3)
1.5'±
1.5'
7' 5' SIDEWALK L BIKE LANE
CRASHBARRIER
3' 1'BUFFER
69'±
EXHIBIT 2CLBR11:?GE
11'S.B. TRAVEL LANE $1 2 S.B. TRAVEL LANE #
19
12'N.B. TRAVEL LANE # 1
3'BUFFER
1.5'
5'BIKE LANE
CRASHBARRIER
69±
BUFFER
BIKE LANES I SIDEWAL CRASH
BARRIER
:1.1 ' 11'
-REPLICA RACING EXHIB IT RERL ICA
RAIL INC 1.51#
SIDEWALK BIKE LANE S.B. TRAVEL LANE # 2 CRASH
BARRIER BUFFER
CLBRIOG E
•
I' •
S.B . TRAVEL LANE
• iNlegiDAVR; N.B. TRAVEL LANE #1
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
• Three vehicular traffic lanes (one lane northbound, two lanes southbound),
sidewalks on both sides, bike lanes both sides, bike lane buffer both sides (Exhibit 3, Transmittal 3)
20
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
• Three vehicular traffic lanes (one lane northbound, two lanes southbound),sidewalks on both sides, bike lanes both sides, bike lane buffer both sides(Exhibit 3, Transmittal 3) , • . .
, .
5' 5' 2'
SIDEWALK BIKE LANE
CRASHBARRIER BUFFER
BIKE LANE SIDEWALKCRASH
BUFFER BARRIER
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Traffic Studies — Level of Service (LOS) Illustration
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Traffic Studies — Level of Service (LOS) Illustration
LOS C
LOS E
LOS D
LOS F21
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Traffic Studies — Level of Service (LOS) on Hyperion Ave
2014 Volumes, 4 Lanes (Existing)
2014 Volumes, 3 Lanes
2040 Volumes, 4 Lanes
2040 Volumes, 3 Lanes
Northbound AM A
D
B
C
D
Northbound PM B E
• In 2014 evening peak hour, the bridge LOS is currently B.
• It would go to D immediately if the road was reduced to one
northbound lane.
• In 2040, it would go to LOS E.
• From a CEQA perspective, this would be a significant impact.
22
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Traffic Studies — Level of Service (LOS) on Hyperion Ave
2014 Volumes, 4
Lanes (Existing)
2014 Volumes,
3 Lanes
2040 Volumes,
4 Lanes
2040 Volumes,
3 Lanes
Northbound AM A B
Northbound PM B D E
• In 2014 evening peak hour, the bridge LOS is currently B.• It would go to D immediately if the road was reduced to one
northbound lane.• In 2040, it would go to LOS E.• From a CEQA perspective, this would be a significant impact.
-4 2
22
69'i
1.5±
CURB
iv 10' 4' 10' _L S.B.IDEWALK 3' THICK TRAVEL LANE * 2 S.B. TRAVEL LANE N 1 MEDIAN N.B. TRAVEL LANE #1 N.B. 'TRAVEL LANE 2
BIZNE
ENGINEERING
23
. • AF.11-ELE'S
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Recommended Option— 4 Vehicular Lanes, 2
Bike Lanes, ADA-Compliant Sidewalk
HYPERION AVENUE BRIDGE OVER 1-5, RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND LA RIVER (LOOKING NORTH)
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OFBRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Recommended Option— 4 Vehicular Lanes, 2Bike. Lanes, ADA-Compliant Sidewalk
HYPERION AVENUE BRIDGE OVER 1-5, RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND LA RIVER (LOOKING NORTH)
1.5".1
V CURB
69't
v 117 _ 4' 10' 11' J a' I NSIDEWALK B3 HatiK S.B. TRAVEL LANE * 2 S.B. TRAVEL LANE N 1 MEDIAN N.B. TRAVEL LANE #1 N.B. TRAVEL LANE 2 wig \1' BARRIER
BIKE LANE
ENGINEERING
ririrrig III
CITY OF LOS ANGELES23
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Recommended Option for Hyperion Ave
• The Recommended Option offers flexibility of converting to other
roadway options if the transportation conditions warrant it in the
future.
• The daily low count of pedestrians on Hyperion Ave would not warrant
sidewalks on both sides by reducing one traffic lane at this time.
• An ADA-compliant sidewalk will be implemented on the west side of
Hyperion Ave.
• Designated bike lanes will be implemented on Hyperion Ave.
ENGINEERING
rirrignin
24 • - r OF LC5 ANGELES
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Recommended Option for Hyperion Ave. . . - : . . • . . ,
The Recommended Option offers flexibility of converting to otherroadway options if the transportation conditions warrant it in thefuture.
The daily low count of pedestrians on Hyperion Ave would not warrantsidewalks on both sides by reducing one traffic lane at this time.
An ADA-compliant sidewalk will be implemented on the west side of
Designated bike lanes will be implemented on Hyperion Ave..e4X9/7",
ENGINEERING
25
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CEQA Environmental Review
• The Recommended Option, which most closely resembles Exhibit 1, is to
maintain the original 4-lane configuration of the circulated IS/MND, as
modified to include: (1) addition of bicycle lanes to Hyperion Ave, and (2)
elimination of a continuous, concrete median barrier.
• These project revisions do not create new significant impacts and do not
change effectiveness of mitigation measures, thus no recirculation of the
2013 IS/WIND is required for approval of the Recommended Option.
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CEQA Environmental Review
• The Recommended Option, which most closely resembles Exhibit 1, is tomaintain the original 4-lane configuration of the circulated IS/MND, asmodified to include: (1) addition of bicycle lanes to Hyperion Ave, and (2)elimination of a continuous, concrete median barrier.
• These project revisions do not create new significant impacts and do not
change effectiveness of mitigation measures, thus no recirculation of the2013 IS/MND is required for approval of the Recommended Option.
ENGINEERING
CITY OF LOS ANGELES25
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CEQA Environmental Review
• The 2013 IS/MND did not include an alternative with three vehicle lanes.
Approval of such an alternative would require additional CEQA review (at
minimum revision and recirculation of an IS/MND and if any potentially
significant impact could not be mitigated to less than significant, an
Environmental Impact Report would be required).
• Additionally, since the close of the public review period, over 400
comments, petitions, and survey results have also been received and
considered by City staff. No new environmental impacts that have not
already been addressed were included.
26
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CEQA Environmental Review.. •
• The 2013 IS/MND did not include an alternative with three vehicle lanes.Approval of such an alternative would require additional CEQA review (atminimum revision and recirculation of an IS/MND and if any potentiallysignificant impact could not be mitigated to less than significant, anEnvironmental Impact Report would be required).
• Additionally, since the close of the public review period, over 400comments, petitions, and survey results have also been received andconsidered by City staff. No new environmental impacts that have notalready been addressed were included.
. :.. ... . ; . .
. . . . .
, .......
26
ENGINEERING
CiTY OF LO5. ANGELEL.,
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Anticipated Schedule/Funds Lapsing
Project Phase/Milestones Anticipated by
End Environmental Phase (CEQA Adoption June 30, 2015 by City Council)
Start Final Design July 1, 2015
End Final Design
June 30, 2017
• Final design funds allocated by Caltrans are set to lapse by June 30,
2017.
• With the above anticipated schedule, which includes the CEQA
approval by June 30, 2015, this project is on track to use allocated
federal funds before it lapses.
• Further delays may result in loss of funds. 27
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Anticipated Schedule/Funds Lapsing
Project Phase/Milestones Anticipated by
End Environmental Phase (CEQA Adoptionby City Council)
Start Final Design
End Final Design
June 30, 2015
July 1, 2015
June 30, 2017
ENGINEERING
7971111nCITY OF LOS ANGELES
• Final design funds allocated by Caltrans are set to lapse by June 30,2017.
• With the above anticipated schedule, which includes the CEQA
approval by June 30, 2015, this project is on track to use allocated
federal funds before it lapses.
• Further delays may result in loss of funds.27
ENGINEERING
Mir1111111 C T..r.!•;LES
GLENDALE BL — HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Focus on the Overall Project • This $50 million project is predominantly funded by the Federal
Highway Bridge Program, State Proposition 1B, and Metro Call for Projects.
• Many years of collaboration with Caltrans/FHWA, along with support of
elected officials and community groups, to receive funding on the
following components that are typically not part of a bridge
improvement project:
• 1-5 Realignment
• Bike access from northbound Glendale BI to LA River Bike Path
• Pedestrian bridge across the LA River
• Infiltration Basin
• Further delays in completing the design of the project will jeopardize
the overall project. 1111111
28
GLENDALE BL HYPERION AVE COMPLEX OF
BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECTFocus on the Overall Project
• This $50 million project is predominantly funded by the FederalHighway Bridge Program, State Proposition 1B, and Metro Call forProjects.
• Many years of collaboration with Caltrans/FHWA, along with support ofelected officials and community groups, to receive funding on thefollowing components that are typically not part of a bridgeimprovement project:
. •:,..,...';',,..„ ,,:,:,,,,,,,:1-5 Realignment ... ' ,•
.. ........... :,...; ........... , ...,..„.„ . : . : ,.„.„ . ,..„... . ........... . . .. . ... . „....„ . . ..„,.„„ . ,.• Bike access from northbound Glendale BI to LA River Bike Path
• Pedestrian bridge across the LA River
• Infiltration Basin
• Further delays in completing the design of the project will jeopardize
ENGINEERING
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
the overall project.
28