generic strategies

36
rategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Upload: daman-kaur

Post on 07-Nov-2014

50 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Page 2: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Michael Porter

• Michael Porter is a professor at Harvard Business School • He is one of the leading thinkers on business strategy,

especially on the subject of competitive advantage• Porter represents what has been called the competitive

position school of thought (as distinct from the resource based or competencies approach) This argues that a firm’s success in strategy rests upon how it positions itself in respect to its environment

• The Porter framework enables an organisation to check the logic of its current competitive strategy and if necessary begin a search for a new strategy

Page 3: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Competitive advantage

• Is the ability of an organisation to add more value for its customers than its rivals and therefore attain a position of relative advantage

• Is what gives a firm an edge over its rivals• Arises from the selection of the generic strategy

that best fits the organisation’s competitive environment

• The key drivers of competitive advantage are cost leadership and differentiation of product

Page 4: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Competitive strategy

• Competitive strategy is the means by which organisations seek to achieve and sustain competitive advantage

• Porter argues that competitive strategy means “taking offensive or defensive actions to create a defendable position in an industry, to cope with …competitive forces and thereby yield a superior return for the firm”

• Firms have discovered different approaches competitive strategy -the best strategy for a firm should reflect its particular circumstances

Page 5: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

The basis of the generic strategies

• Porter argues that a firm’s strengths ultimate fall into one of two headings: cost advantage and differentiation

• By applying these strengths in a broad or a narrow focus, three generic strategies result: cost leadership, differentiation and focus

• They are called generic strategies because they are not specific to a firm or an industry

Page 6: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Porter’s Generic strategies

• Porter identified the four strategies to achieve a competitive advantage

• Cost leadership: superior profits through lower costs

• Differentiation: higher profits by adding value to the product areas which are of real significance for customers who in turn are willing to pay premium prices

• Focus strategy: concentrating on a limited part of the market Focus strategy is then subdivided into focus cost leadership and focus differentiation

Page 7: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Porter’s generic strategies

Target scope

Advantage

Low cost

Advantage

Product uniqueness

Broad

(industry wide)

Cost leadership strategy

Differentiation strategy

Narrow

(market wide)

Focus strategy

(low cost)

Focus strategy

(differentiation)

Page 8: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Generic strategies at a glance

Low cost

Low cost culture

Economies of scale

Eliminate unnecessary costs

Enjoy high profits through cost advantage

Differentiation

Adding value through

-product features

-product quality

-distinctive offering

Offer something new or different

High costs but charge premium price

Focus

Niche markets

Targeting

Limited territory

Focus on a specific group of customers

Either cost leader or differentiation with in the segment

Page 9: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Cost leadership

• This strategy concentrates on aiming to become the lowest cost producer in the industry through economies of scale

• In this way the firm can compete on price with every other producers in the industry and earn higher unit profits

• Cost reduction provides the focus of the organisation’s strategy

• Competitive advantage is achieved by driving down costs

Page 10: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Cost leadership

• Cost leadership is based on – Efficiency to drive down costs– Effectiveness- knowing what is and what is not important

to customers and saving on the latter

• But there is room for only one cost leader• A successful cost leadership strategy requires that

the firm is the cost leader and is unchallenged in this position

• Cost leadership is especially beneficial in markets where customers are price sensitive

Page 11: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Sources of cost leadership

• Size - economies of scale• Greater labour efficiency and effectiveness• Control of overheads • Superior management• Greater operating efficiency and effectiveness• Low cost production• Low cost labour• Design for low cost production • Use the latest technology to reduce costs and or enhance

productivity• Relocation to low cost site• Favourable access to low cost sources of supply• Reduction in waste

Page 12: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Firms that succeed in cost leadership

• Firms that succeed in cost leadership have the following strengths:– Access to the capital required to make significant

investment in fixed assets– Design skills for efficient manufacture– A high level of expertise in manufacturing process

engineering– Efficient distribution channels

• Examples of cost leadership : Ryanair, Toyota, Wal-Mart (parent company of Asda), Tesco

Page 13: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

A misconception

• Cost leadership is often seen as a strategy that aims to attract customers with low prices that are made possible by low costs

• But cost leadership does not necessarily mean selling at the lowest price

• It might mean selling at the industry average price but enjoying above average profits through low cost production

• The low costs result in high profit margins

Page 14: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Benefits of cost leadership

• Enjoy higher than average profits• Engage in price war • Eliminate rivals• Defend market share• Increase market share• Build barriers to the entry of newcomers to

the market• Weaken the threat of substitutes• Enter new markets

Page 15: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Five forces analysis

• Porter developed the five forces model as a framework for the analysis of profitability of the industry

• The five forces are:– Suppliers power: powerful suppliers can push up the cost of inputs– Buyers’ power: powerful buyers can negotiate low prices– The threat of substitutes: where there is a strong threat firms need

to remain very competitive – The ease or otherwise of entry to the market: low barriers raise the

prospect new firms pushing down prices – The intensity of rivalry in the market: intense competition forces

firms to keep prices down

• The five forces model can be used to analyse each of the generic strategies

Page 16: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Five forces and cost leadership

The five forces The cost leader is

Entry barriers Able to cut prices to discourage potential entrants to the market

Buyer power Able to offer a competitive price to buyers with power

Supplier power Insulated from a powerful buyer by low costs

Threat of substitution

Able to make use of low price as defence against substitutes

Rivalry Is better able to compete on price

Page 17: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Risks of cost leadership

• Vulnerability to even lower cost operators• As technology improves, a competitor may be able

to leapfrog the production capabilities, thus eliminating the competitive advantage

• It could lead to a damaging price wars• There might by difficulty in sustaining cost

leadership in the long run• A firm following a focus strategy might be able to

achieve even lower cost within their segment

Page 18: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Differentiation

• A differentiation strategy calls for the development of a product or service that offers attributes that are both unique and are valued by customers

• Customers perceive the product to be different and better than that of rivals

• As a result the value added by the uniqueness of the product may allow the firm to charge a premium price for it

Page 19: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Differentiation

• Success in a differentiation strategy means– Gaining a competitive advantage by making their

product different from competitors – Competing on the basis of value added to customers– Persuading customers that the firm’s product is superior

to that offered by rivals– Customers being willing to pay a premium price to cover

higher costs • Differentiation can be based on product image or

durability,after-sales,quality,additional features,after sales

• And it requires flair, research capability and strong marketing

Page 20: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Extra costs and premium prices

• Differentiation adds costs in order to add value • The extra costs can only be recouped if the market

is willing to pay a premium price• Problems occur if the extra costs incurred

outweigh the additional revenue generated by higher prices

• For a successful differentiation strategy it is insufficient merely to add value - customers must recognise and appreciate the difference

• Extra costs should be added only in areas that customers perceive to be important

Page 21: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Sources of differentiation

• Creation of strong brand• Superior performance• High quality• Additional features offered• Innovation in packaging• Speed of distribution• Higher service levels• Greater flexibility• Delivery • Quality of the materials

Page 22: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Firms that succeed in a differentiation strategy

• Firms that succeed in a differentiation strategy have: – Have access to leading scientific research– A strong creative product development team– Strong sales team with the ability to successfully

communicate the strengths of the product– Reputation for quality and innovation

• Examples:– BMW– Miele - high quality domestic appliances– James Purdey – rifles– Bang and Olufsen- high quality hi-fi– Mercedes

Page 23: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Differentiation: benefits

• Differentiation offers the prospect of charging a premium price

• Demand for a differentiated product will be less elastic than that for competitors products

• Differentiation can result in above average profits• Differentiation can create additional barriers to

entry to the market for newcomers

Page 24: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

The five forces and differentiation

Five forces A firm pursuing a differentiation strategy…

Entry barriers Benefits from customer loyalty which discourages potential entrants

Buyer power Enjoys some protection since large buyers have less power to negotiate because of the absence of close alternatives

Supplier power Is better able to pass on supplier price increases to customers

Threat of substitution

Is protected from the threat of substitutes by customer loyalty

Rivalry Benefits from brand loyalty to keep customers from rivals

Page 25: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Risks of differentiation strategy

• There are difficulties of sustaining differentiation• Differentiation involves higher costs• There is a risk of creating differences that customers do not

value • Customers might become price sensitive and choose on

price rather than uniqueness• It might involve differentiation on dimensions that become

less important to customers over time• Customers may no longer need the differentiation factor• Imitators may narrow the differentiation• Rivals pursuing a focus strategy may be able to achieve

even greater differentiation in their market segments

Page 26: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Focus strategy

• In a focus strategy the firm concentrates on one (or at most a limited number of) segments of the market

• The premise behind this strategy is that the needs of the group can be bettered served by focussing entirely on it

• The firm might feel more secure in the niche with greater insulation from competition

• A focus strategy means that the firm’s efforts are not spread too thinly

• Focus strategies are – Cost focus: cost leader in a particular segment– Focus differentiation: differentiation in the chosen segment

Page 27: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Requirements of a focus strategy

• A focus strategy requires…• The identification of a suitable target customer

group• Identification of the specific needs of that group• Confirmation that the market is sufficiently large to

sustain the business• Estimation of the extent of competition within the

segment• Production of products to meet the specific needs

of that group• A decision on whether to opt for cost leadership or

differentiation within the segment

Page 28: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Benefits of a focus strategy

• It involves lower investment in resources

• The firm benefits from specialisation

• It provides scope for greater knowledge of a segment of the market

• It makes entry to new markets easier and less costly

• Firms using a focus strategy often enjoy a high degree of customer loyalty

Page 29: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Focussed cost leadership

• A strategy that aims…

• To attract one type of customer with a low cost product

• To be the lowest cost operator in one particular niche segment of the market

• Example :Hyundai

Page 30: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Focussed differentiation

• A strategy that aims to attract one type of customer with a differentiated product

• It involves distinctiveness in one segment

• Aims to exploit unique position in a niche segment of the market

• Not the cheapest but the best or most distinctive in that segment

• Example: BMW, Mercedes

Page 31: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

The five forces and a focus strategy

The five forces A firm pursuing a focus strategy…

Entry barriers Develops core competencies that can act as an entry barrier

Buyer power Enjoys some insulation since large buyers have less power to negotiate because few alternatives are available

Supplier power Is better able to pass on supplier price rises thereby reducing the impact of supplier power

Threat of substitution Enjoys some protection against substitutes by specialised products and core competencies

Rivalry Enjoys some protection because rivals cannot meet differentiation focused customer needs

Page 32: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Problems associated with focus strategy

• Limited opportunities for growth• Sacrifice of economies of scale that would be

available from a larger market• The firm could outgrow the market• Danger of decline in the chose segment or niche• A reputation for specialisation inhibits move into

new sectors• Risk of imitation• Risk of changes in the target segment

Page 33: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Stuck in the middle

• Porter argued that a firm must make a conscious choice about the competitive advantage it seeks to develop

• If it fails to choose one of these strategies,it risks being “stuck in the middle”,trying to be all things to all people,and ends up with no competitive strategy at all

• Being stuck in the middle leads to low profitability• Competitors with a clear strategy outperform those

whose strategy is unclear or attempt a combination of strategies

Page 34: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

What is wrong with being “stuck in the middle”?

• It is difficult to simultaneously become differentiated and low cost

• The firm loses out to others able to undercut it and to those able to offer a superior product

• If a firm differentiates itself by supplying very high quality products it risks undermining that quality if it seeks to be come a cost leader

• Such a firm also suffers from a blurred corporate culture and the projection of a confusing image

Page 35: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Multiple strategies

• Firms that are able to succeed at multiple strategies create separate business units for each strategy

• By separating the strategies into– Different units– Each with its own culture– Each with its own brands

Page 36: Generic Strategies

Strategy – Porter’s Generic Strategies

Generic strategies: summary

• Cost leadership– Being the lowest cost producer in the industry as a

whole

• Differentiation– The exploitation of a product or service which is believed

to be unique

• Focus– Restricting activities to only part of the market through:– Providing goods or services at lower cost to that

segment (cost focus)– Providing a differentiated product or service to that

segment (differentiation focus)