general ledger re-design

14
General Ledger Re- design Presenter: Anne Shrubshall Date: 18 th March 2008

Upload: venus-pugh

Post on 01-Jan-2016

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

General Ledger Re-design. Presenter: Anne Shrubshall Date: 18 th March 2008. Existing code structure Reasons to change Drawbacks New segments (1) New segments (2) Mandatory segments. Optional segments Examples Timescales Suggestions Project Schedule. Agenda. 1-AWRB3047-50100. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: General Ledger Re-design

General Ledger Re-design

Presenter: Anne Shrubshall

Date: 18th March 2008

Page 2: General Ledger Re-design

Agenda

• Existing code structure

• Reasons to change

• Drawbacks

• New segments (1)

• New segments (2)

• Mandatory segments

• Optional segments

• Examples

• Timescales

• Suggestions

• Project Schedule

Page 3: General Ledger Re-design

Existing code structure

1-AWRB3047-50100

“Unit”

FundingSource

Dept

Objective“Group”

Objective“Specific”

Page 4: General Ledger Re-design

Reasons to change

Two segments not flexible enough

TRAC (and other things) require more in-

depth cost analysis

Additional segments needed

Need to implement new coding structure

before we consider replacing Aptos

Page 5: General Ledger Re-design

Drawbacks

“Unit” is non-standard:- LDAP, AltaHR, SITS & Aptos all use different

Two segments is too inflexible

Other methods (eg. Trx Analysis) are

unreliable

Cost Centre contains too much data

Detail Code is used inconsistently

Page 6: General Ledger Re-design

New segment options (1)

Unit

Department

Funding source?

Activity

TB Type – I&E or BS

Nominal code

Page 7: General Ledger Re-design

New segment options (2)

Project

Sponsor “type” – SPO/OSR

MIR reporting “group”

Published a/cs reporting “group”

HESA category

Other?

Page 8: General Ledger Re-design

Mandatory Segments

Segment Format Explanation

UNIT A99 Similar to the first two digits of

the current Cost Centre, but

separate and more flexible.

DEPT XXX Similar to the last digit of the

current Cost Centre, but separate and

more flexible.

ACT 99 Denoting an activity or type.

SUBCODE 999 Subjective code

Page 9: General Ledger Re-design

Optional Segments

Segment Format Explanation

FUND AA Similar to the third digit of the

current Cost Centre, but separate

and more flexible. This would

denote a special funding source,

other than “recurrent allocation”.

SPONSOR AX Denoting a research project sponsor

type (only where the FUND denoted

“externally funded”)

PROJECT XXX9999 Denoting a project number

Page 10: General Ledger Re-design

Examples

1-A01-ENG-06-504 which might mean:

Exeter-SALL-English-Conferences-Air Fares

1-A01-ENG-03-504-A011049-EF-E1 which might mean:

Exeter-SALL-English-Research-Air Fares-Project Number A011049 -

Externally Funded-By the European Commission

(Note: this is SALL project # 1049 – there may be other projects

numbered 1049, but they will have different UNIT prefixes)

Page 11: General Ledger Re-design

Timescales

Project underway now

Your suggestions awaited

Very wide consultation

Go live from 1-August-2009

Page 12: General Ledger Re-design

Your suggestionshttps://survey.ex.ac.uk/gl-redesign

Page 13: General Ledger Re-design

Schedule

Phase 1 – Consultation/Data collection. 30-Sep-08

Phase 2 – Business planning templates. 31-Dec-08

Phase 3 – Interfaces. 31-Jul-09

Phase 4 – Data entry. 31-Jul-09

Phase 5 – Training. 31-Jul-09

Phase 6 – Reporting. 31-Jul-09

Phase 7 – Post-implementation review. 31-Jan-10

Page 14: General Ledger Re-design

Thank you – any questions?