gde plans for next year barry barish gde meeting frascati 8-dec-05 orsay coupler

GDE Plans for Next Year

Barry BarishGDE Meeting

Frascati 8-Dec-05

Orsay Coupler

9-Dec-05 GDE - Frascati 2

Global Design Effort

– The Mission of the GDE • Produce a design for the ILC that includes a

detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan , siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope.

• Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate

GDEExecutive Committee

GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board

GDEChange Control Board

GDEDesign Cost Board

GDE RDR / R&D Organization


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate


GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board




Reporting

resourcestechnical


ILCSC – Daigu Sept 05• Annex 1 • Organizational Structure, Functioning and Governance of the ILC GDE • General Principles

– The ILCSC establishes the Central Team to coordinate and direct the effort of the teams in Asia, Europe and Americas that comprise the Global Design Effort (GDE).

• Function of the Central and Regional Teams– The Central Team is the focal point for the ILC design effort, holding

the schedule, major milestones, and parameter list, and providing intellectual leadership under ICFA guidance.

– Regional Teams perform the R&D and design work of ILC systems in close coordination with the Central Team.

• Composition of the Central Team– The Central Team will be led by the Central Team Director.– The Central Team Director will be selected and appointed by the ILCSC

with recommendations from the Regional Steering Committees.– The Central Team Director will appoint three Regional Directors in

consultation with the respective Regional Steering Committees. Each Regional Director will be a member of the Central Team and as such will have primary loyalty to the Central Team.

•– The Central Team will have its own staff, estimated to be about 20

FTEs, covering various tasks charged to the Central Team.


ILCSC – Daigu Sept 05• Responsibilities of the Central Team

– The responsibilities of the Central Team are to collectively:• Manage the execution of the ILC design and associated R&D;• Establish technical and administrative controls to ensure that the

agreed-upon work toward the RDR and TDR is executed within their approved cost, schedule and technical scope under this MOU; and

• Maintain and control the machine parameters database and configuration documents, and direct overall design effort.

• Responsibility of the Central Team Director– The Central Team Director will be responsible to the ILCSC for leading

the Central Team to fulfill the responsibility of the Central Team.– Should the need for conflict resolution arise, the Central Team Director

has the final authority in all areas of design and personnel in the Central Team.

– He/she will be the primary representative for the project in interactions with external entities and in the project-status reporting.

• Funding for the Central Team Activities– Participating institutions will be expected to share the cost of common

operations of the Central Team such as the administrative expenses including the secretarial support, purchase of web services, and other expenses as requested by the Central Team Director and approved by the ILCSC.

– Etc….


FALC – Fermilab Nov 05• Meeting of Funding Agencies to discuss the status and funding prospects

for a linear collider of 0.5 to 1TeV (FALC). Seventh meeting held in Fermilab on 4 November 2005

• 1. The seventh meeting of representatives from CERN (President of Council and DG), Canada (NRC), France (CNRS), Germany (BMBF), Italy (INFN), Japan (MEXT), Korea (MOST), UK (PPARC) and the US (DOE, NSF) was held in Fermilab on 4 November 2005.

• 2. The Group received a report from Professor Barish on the status of the Global Design Effort and congratulated him on progress to date.

• 3. The Group agreed that a Common Fund should be established to fund the administrative support required for the GDE, with the costs to be funded equally by the three regions. This Common Fund would be administered by Fermilab and be the subject of a MOU to be agreed by the FALC Resources Group.

• 4. The Group discussed the need to minimize duplication of reporting and increase communication between the current project structure and FALC. The Chairs of ICFA and ILCSC were invited to attend future meetings of the Group and the Chair of ILCSC was invited to attend future meetings of the FALC Resources Group.

• 5. It was agreed that a subgroup of FALC, representing all three regions, would consider the future mandate of FALC, its composition, the relationship with existing bodies required as the project moved to a more formal governance structure and mechanisms by which funds could be made available both before and after a site decision.

• 6. It was agreed that the next meeting would be held on 22 May 2006 in Rome.


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate


GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board




GDE


GDE MembersChris Adolphsen, SLACJean-Luc Baldy, CERNPhilip Bambade, LAL, OrsayBarry Barish, CaltechWilhelm Bialowons, DESYGrahame Blair, Royal HollowayJim Brau, University of OregonKarsten Buesser, DESYElizabeth Clements, FermilabMichael Danilov, ITEPJean-Pierre Delahaye, CERN, Gerald Dugan, Cornell UniversityAtsushi Enomoto, KEKBrian Foster, Oxford UniversityWarren Funk, JLABJie Gao, IHEPTerry Garvey, LAL-IN2P3Hitoshi Hayano, KEKTom Himel, SLACBob Kephart, FermilabEun San Kim, Pohang Acc LabHyoung Suk Kim, Kyungpook Nat’l UnivShane Koscielniak, TRIUMFVic Kuchler, FermilabLutz Lilje, DESY

Tom Markiewicz, SLACDavid Miller, Univ College of LondonShekhar Mishra, FermilabYouhei Morita, KEKOlivier Napoly, CEA-SaclayHasan Padamsee, Cornell UniversityCarlo Pagani, DESYNan Phinney, SLACDieter Proch, DESYPantaleo Raimondi, INFNTor Raubenheimer, SLACFrancois Richard, LAL-IN2P3Perrine Royole-Degieux, GDE/LALKenji Saito, KEKDaniel Schulte, CERNTetsuo Shidara, KEKSasha Skrinsky, Budker InstituteFumihiko Takasaki, KEKLaurent Jean Tavian, CERNNobu Toge, KEKNick Walker, DESYAndy Wolski, LBLHitoshi Yamamoto, Tohoku UnivKaoru Yokoya, KEK

49 members

New MembersMarc Ross (SLAC)Bill Willis (Columbia)Andre Seryi (SLAC)John Sheppard (SLAC)Ewan Patterson (SLAC)Peter Garbincius (Fermilab)Maseo Kuriki (KEK)Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK)Nobuhiro Terunuma (KEK)Norihito Ohuchi (KEK)Susanna Guiducci (INFN)Deepa Angal-Kalinin (CCLRC)

TotalsAmericas 22Europe 23Asia 16


GDE Structure and Organization

• Executive Committee for Baseline Configuration– GDE Director

• Barish

– Regional Directors • Dugan – Americas • Foster – Europe• Takasaki – Asia

– Accelerator Leaders• Yokoya - Asia• Raubenheimer - Americas• Walker - Europe

• Responsible for decisions and documentation for the Baseline Configuration Document (BCD)

GDEExecutiveCommittee


GDE Structure and Organization

• GDE Groups– Design / Cost Engineers

• Shidara – Asia

• Bialowons – Europe

• Garbincius – Americas

– Siting, Civil Construction and Infrastructure• Baldy - Europe

• Enomoto – Asia

• Kuchler – Amercas

– Physics / Detectors (WWS chairs)• Brau - Americas

• Richard - Europe

• Yamamoto - Asia

– Accelerator Experts (44 GDE members)


GDE Organizational Evolution for RDR

• Selected additions to the GDE following the BCD completion having needed skills in design, engineering, costing, etc

• Change Control Board– The baseline will be put under configuration control and a

Board with a single chair will be created with needed expertise.

• Design / Cost Board– A GDE Board with single chair will be established to

coordinate the reference design effort, including coordinating the overall model for implementing the baseline ILC, coordinating the design tasks, costing, etc.

• R&D Board– A GDE Board will be created to evaluate, prioritize and

coordinate the R&D program in support of the baseline and alternatives with a single chair


Change Control Board (CCB) Nobu Toge (chair)

• The Change Control Board is responsible for maintaining the baseline configuration as defined in the Baseline Configuration Document. The first action of the CCB will be to finalize the BCD and put it under configuration control. In addition to maintaining the baseline, the CCB will assess R&D projects defined in the BCD that potentially can lead to improvements over the baseline in cost or performance. The CCB will define what needs to be demonstrated in these R&D projects, in order to be considered for a CCB action to replace the baseline.

• The CCB will work with the GDE EC to formalize levels for taking change control actions. Major changes in the baseline defined as changing costs by more than $100M or make significant changes in performance, schedule or risk will be recommended to the Director and GDE EC for final approval. For all other changes, the CCB will be the final authority.


Change Control Board (CCB) Nobu Toge (chair)

Markiewicz US

Mishra US

Funk US

Kubo Asia

Kuriki Asia

Pagani EU

Blair EU

Schulte EU


Baseline Configuration Document

• Our ‘Deliverable’ by the end of 2005

• A structured electronic document– Documentation (reports, drawings etc)– Technical specs.– Parameter tables– …

• A ‘printable / readable’ summary document (~100 pages) ---- (available in January)


Design Cost Board (DCB) Peter Garbincius (chair)

• The Design / Cost Board will be responsible for assessing and providing guidance for the overall RDR design effort program. The DCB initial goals will be to propose the overall structure and content for the RDR document to be developed by the end of 2006. It also will provide early guidance required to enable the design / cost effort to get fully underway by the time of the Bangalore GDE meeting.

• The DCB will set goals and milestones for producing the RDR, conduct design reviews and provide guidance and assessments of the RDR effort. The DCB will report to the Director and EC regularly as the design / cost effort progresses, reporting on early evaluations of costs, problems and changes needed in the BCD, etc.


Design Cost Board (DCB) Peter Garbincius (chair)

Phinney US

Paterson US

Kephart US

Enomoto Asia

Shidara Asia

Terunuma Asia

Bialowons EU

Delahaye EU

Napoly EU


Design Approach

• Create a baseline configuration for the machine– Document a concept for ILC machine with a complete

layout, parameters etc. defined by the end of 2005– Make forward looking choices, consistent with attaining

performance goals, and understood well enough to do a conceptual design and reliable costing by end of 2006.

– Technical and cost considerations will be an integral part in making these choices.

– Baseline will be put under “configuration control,” with a defined process for changes to the baseline.

– A reference design will be carried out in 2006. I am proposing we use a “parametric” design and costing approach.

– Technical performance and physics performance will be evaluated for the reference design


Parametric Approach

• Parametric approach to design– machine parameters : a space to optimize the machine

– Trial parameter space, being evaluated by subsystems

– machine design : incorporate change without redesign; incorporates value engineering, trade studies at each step to minimize costs


Global R&D Board (RDB) Bill Willis (chair)

• The Global R&D Board will be responsible for assessing and providing guidance for the overall R&D program. The RDB will suggest priorities for the research facilities and R&D supporting the baseline, the R&D on alternatives to the baseline and selective R&D that could further the field in the longer term. The mission will also include global assessments and recommended priorities for the detector R&D program and evaluate the balance between accelerator and detector R&D.

• The RDB will develop a proposal driven program, structured in the sense of defined goals, and milestones, and resources evaluated on a common basis to allow comparison across different regions and national funding systems. It will conduct reviews and identify gaps in coverage of topics, resource or technical issues, duplications, and other concerns..


Global R&D Board (RDB) Bill Willis (chair)

Padamsee US

Himel US

Wolski US

Hayano Asia

Higo Asia

Elsen EU

Lilje EU

Garvey EU

Damerell EU


Approach to ILC R&D Program

• Proposal-driven R&D in support of the baseline design. – Technical developments, demonstration experiments,

industrialization, etc.

• Proposal-driven R&D in support of alternatives to the baseline– Proposals for potential improvements to the baseline,

resources required, time scale, etc.

• Develop a prioritized DETECTOR R&D program aimed at technical developments needed to reach combined design performance goals


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate


GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board




ILCDesignEffort

ILCR&D

Program


GDE Organization for Snowmass

•W

G1

LE

T b

dy

n.

•W

G2

Ma

in L

ina

c

•W

G3

a S

ou

rces

•W

G3

b D

R

•W

G4

BD

S

•W

G5

Ca

vity• GG1 Parameters• GG2 Instrumentation• GG3 Operations & Reliability• GG4 Cost & Engineering• GG5 Conventional Facilities• GG6 Physics Options

Technical sub-systemWorking Groups

Global Group

Provide input


Area Systems

e- source e+ sourceDamping

Rings RTMLMain Linac BDS

Kuriki Gao

E.S. Kim Hayano

Yamamoto (MDI Ch)

??? Guiducci PT Lilje Angal-Kalinin

Brachmann Sheppard Wolski

Adolphsen

SolyakSeryi


Technical Systems

Vacuum systems Suetsugu Michelato Noonan

Magnet systems Sugahara BINP ?? Thompkins

Cryomodule Ohuchi Pagani Carter

Cavity Package Saito Proch Padamsee

RF Power Fukuda Saclay ?? Larsen

Instrumentation Urakawa Burrows Ross

Dumps and Collimators KEK ?? ??

Accelerator Physics Kubo Schulte ??

Global Systems

Commissioning, Operations & Reliability Terunuma Elsen Himel

Control System Michizono Simrock Carwardine

Cryogenics Hosoyama Tavian Peterson

CF&S Enomoto Baldy Kuchler

Installation Shidara Bialwons ??


Request for

Sample Site Information

To be used to study siting issues, in advance of a call for “expressions of interest” to host the ILC


How and when to involve industry?

• Large Scale Project Characterization– Large Project Management– Precision Engineering– International Coordination– Costing

• Industrialization– Civil Construction & Infrastructure– Cryogenics– Superconducting RF structures, couplers, etc– Electronics and Control Systems– Large Scale Computing


GDE ILC Wiring Diagram

The GDE Plan and Schedule 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Global Design Effort Project

globally coordinated

Baseline configuration

Reference Design

ILC R&D Program

Technical Design

FALC

Siting

International Mgmt

expression of interestsample sies

regionial coord

ICFA / ILCSC

Funding

Hosting

gde plans for next year barry barish gde meeting frascati 8-dec-05 orsay coupler

Documents

central teamthe central

regional teamsthe central

ilc design effort

areas of design

global design effort

design work of ilc systems

direct overall design

detailed design concept