gaseous systems application

92
© Viking S.A. VIKING EMEA GASEOUS SYSTEMS Peter Eisenberger

Upload: lelien

Post on 02-Jan-2017

238 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gaseous systems application

© Viking S.A.

VIKING EMEA

GASEOUS SYSTEMS

Peter Eisenberger

Page 2: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 2

Agenda

2

� About Viking EMEA

� The Viking sales organisation

� Gaseous systems basic

� Gaseous systems design background

� Gaseous systems applications

� Case study 13,8kV substation

Page 3: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 3

Minimax-Viking History

3

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950

Tyden Seal -

Hastings, MI

Viking

Contracting

Original Tyden

Dry Valve

Viking

Deluge

Valve

Viking

Corporation is

born

Minimax Bad Urach

Facility opened

Minimax is

born

Minimax is #1 Fire

extinguisher

manfacturer worldwide

Page 4: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 4

Minimax-Viking History

4

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Viking

SupplyNet

Viking Fabrication

Services

Viking

Plastics

R & D

Expansion

Automated

Assembly

Model M

Introduced

Viking

International sales

begin

Viking International

offices opened in

Asia/Europe

Preussag

acquires

Minimax

Minimax Enters

Private Equity

Ownership

Minimax

& Viking

Merge (2009)

Minimax

expands to US

and acquires

CFP

Bad Oldesloe

Test Centre

Opened

Page 5: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 5

In research we are ahead

Fire research centre

� Practical prove of theoretical research results

� Cooperation with testing authorities

� Solutions to specific client issues

� Development of new Minimax solutions

� Fire tests with a scale 1:1

� Mobile suspended ceiling from 2 up to 15 meter

� Auditorium with 140 seats

Page 6: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 6

The Minimax Viking group at a glance

6

Turnover > 1 billion EUR6,600 employees worldwide

Worldwide presence

Broad product and services offering

More than 60 fire protection companies

Own research centres Own production plants

Page 7: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 7

Viking „BLUE“ GroupDistribution of

Products & Systems

Minimax „RED“ GroupContracting Service fromdesign to maintenance

Where does Viking EMEA fit into the organization?

A world wide group leader in fire protection market

VIKING – EMEA

Authorized Distributor

End User, EPC contractors

Page 8: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 8

Viking EMEA

More than 43.000 components for various application

Foam systems

Clean agents Detection

Sprinkler systems

Logistics & Sales

Sales office

Viking EMEA – Europe, Middle East, Afrika

– 16 Sales offices

– 8 Logistic centers

– More than 150 employees

Page 9: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 9

Viking EMEA Locations

9

Branch office with local contact persons for sales and order management

Branch office with additional technical support and training facility

Filling/refilling locations with stock

Page 10: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 10

Gaseous systems basics

When you need: full homogenous 3-dimensional effect, non residual, no electric

conductivity direct or indirect, penetration into cabinets or installations.

When you have: Shielded objects, hardly accessible areas, deep seated or concealed

fires, high ceilings, sensitive equipment where water would cause same damage like fire.

Typical applications: All kind of electric risks like IT areas, Switchgear , Communication,

Control rooms, Cable tunnels, Data Center, Archives, electric cabinets and many more

No other agent can give you this characteristics !

Arguments for the application of Gaseous extinguishant

Page 11: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 11

Reducing available energy for combustion process

� FK-5-1-12= Novec 1230

� HFC-227ea= FM200, Solkaflam227 etc.

Fire Triangle

Extinguishing effects

Reducing oxygen below 13,6Vol% for 20min

� IG-01

� IG-100

� IG-55

� IG-541

� CO2

Combustible material

state of aggregation in cylinder

Gaseous: IG-01, IG-100, IG-55, IG-541

Liquidous: FK-5-1-12, HFC-227ea, CO2

Gaseous systems basics

Page 12: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 12

© 3M 2007. All Rights Reserved.

Agent Use Conc. NOAEL* Safety Margin

Novec 1230 4.5 - 6% 10% 67 - 150%

HFC-125 8.7-12.1% 7.5% ---

HFC-227ea 7 - 9% 9% 0 - 25%

Inert Gas 34,2 - 61% 43% 0 - 13%

CO2 34 - 75% <5% lethal > 10%

* No Observable Adverse Effect Level

Safety

Gaseous systems basics

Page 13: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 13

© 3M 2007. All Rights Reserved.

Safety

Gaseous systems basics

Remaining oxygen concentration after release

� Room of 1000m³ flooded with Novec 1230 / HFC-227ea / Inertgas , Design NFPA 2001 Class C

hazard @20°C, cylinders 10m away from the hazard.

� We consider 10% of agent will be lost through openings and, flaps, vents.

AgentQuantity

in kg

Cylinder

size

Working

pressure

Cylinde

r no

Design

in vol%

Total Gas

amount

flooded in m³

Oxygen level

before

flooding

Remaining

Oxygen after

flooding

Similar to

altitude of

Novec 1230 653,1 140l 50 4 4,50% 52,79 20,90% 19,91 400m

HFC-227ea 572,0 140l 50 4 7,30% 80,72 20,90% 19,38 600m

IG-541 688,5 80l 300 21 38,5% 504,0 20,90% 11,42 4800m

IG-01 864,7 80l 300 22 40,7% 528,0 20,90% 10,97 5180m

IG-55 784,7 80l 300 25 42,7% 600,0 20,90% 9,61 6100m

IG-100 599,0 80l 300 25 40,3% 600,0 20,90% 9,61 6100m

Page 14: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 14

© 3M 2007. All Rights Reserved.

Properties Novec 1230 HFC-125 HFC-227ea HFC-23

Atmospheric

Lifetime (years)0.014 29 33 260

Ozone Depletion

Potential0 0 0 0

Global Warming

Potential

(100 yr ITH)

1 3220 3500 14800

Sustainability

Gaseous systems basics

Page 15: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 15

GWP= Global Warming Potential

� The GWP is shown off as CO2 equivalents, 1 kg of FM-

200 contributes so much to the global warming like

3220 kg of CO2 !

� The height of the GWP Value depend´s on the

atmospheric lifetime, FM-200 stays for about 40 years in

the atmosphere HFC-23 for over 260 years !

� The most common used HFKW for extinguishing

purpose are:

� FM-200/FE-227ea/HFC-227ea = GWP 3220

� FE-13/Trigon/HFC-23 = GWP 14800

� FE-25/Ecaro25/HFC-125=GWP 3500

� This means by mass, in case of release a CO2 equivalent

emission of approx. “2,2 tons” / m³ with HFC-227ea

� and approx. “7,7 tons” with HFC-23, per m³.

Sustainability

Gaseous systems basics

Page 16: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 16

HFC-227ea aka FM 200

� Personal Safety

� Toxicological safe

� NOAEL=9% VOL

� LOAEL=10.5% VOL

� Extinguishing

� Heat absorption in the fire

� Design concentration= 6,9- 9 % by vol.

� 0,54 – 0,72 kg/m³

� Application

� Fire class: A + B

� Environmental aspect

� ODP Value= 0

� No degradation of Ozone

� Ca. 40 years of atmospheric lifetime

� GWP Value= 3220 (EU VO 842/2006)

� free of chlore and brome HFC´s

Heptafluoropropane C3HF7

Sustainability

Gaseous systems basics

FK-5-1-12 aka Novec™ 1230

CF3CF2C(O)CF(CF3)2

� Personal Safety

� Toxicological safe

� NOAL=10 % by vol.

� LOAL=10 % by vol.

� Extinguishing

� Heat absorption in the fire

� Design concentration= 4,5-5,9 % by vol.

� 0,66 – 0,83 kg/m³

� Application

� Fire class: A + B

� Environmental aspects

� ODP Value= 0

� No degradation of Ozone

� Max. 5 days of atmospheric lifetime

� Fast natural degradation

� Free of all kinds of HFC‘s

H = hydrogen

F = fluorine

C = carbon

O = Oxygen

Page 17: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 17

“If 3M™ Novec™ 1230 Fire Protection Fluid is banned from or restricted in use as a fire protection agent due to ODP,

or GWP, 3M will refund the purchase price of the Novec 1230 fluid.“

Warranty good for 20 years.

Characteristics of 3MTM NovecTM1230 - It is future-proof

Due to the reason, that Novec™ 1230 is no HFC it is the only environmental friendly alternative to HFC´s and is

not regulated by any “Kyoto Protocol” Regulations.

The long term sustainability of Novec™ 1230 is shown through the 3M Blue Sky Warranty:

Sustainability

Gaseous systems basics

Page 18: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 18

Inertgas

80l / 200bar

Inertgas

80l / 300bar

Inertgas

140l / 300bar

Novec 1230,

FM200

50bar

Space to protect 1000m³ acc. NFPA Class C

Gaseous systems basics

Page 19: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 19

Extinguishing

10 20 40 110 170 Seconds

Flooding

Inertgases & CO2

60sec flooding

Fluorinated Agents

Evacuation

Speed

Gaseous systems basics

0

% smoke

0,5

2,0

5,0

30

Inertgases & CO2

120sec flooding

Smoke produced

Page 20: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 20

Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!Eventuell noch ein erläuternder Schlusssatz

NFPA 2001 versus ISO 14520

Gaseous systems design background

Page 21: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 21

ISO 14520 NameISO14520-

Part#NOAEL LOAEL

Surface Class A

Class BHigher

Class ANFPA 2001-2012 adressed

NOAEL LOAELClass A Design

Class B Design

Class C fuels(6)

GWP acc IPCC

2007ODP Trade names

CF3I 2 0,2 0,4 min.4,6 4,6 9,3 FIC-13I1 0,2 0,4 (5) (5) (5) 0 0 Triodide

FK-5-1-12 5 10 >10 5,3 5,9 5,6 FK-5-1-12 10 >10 4,5 5,9 4,5 1 0 Novec 1230

HCFC Blend A 6 10 >10 7,8 13,0 12,4 HCFC Blend A 10 >10 (5) (5) (5) 1550 0,048 NAF S-III

HFC-125 8 7,5 10 11,2 12,1 11,5 HFC-125 7,5 10 8,7 11,3 9 3250 0 Ecaro 25

HFC-227ea 9 9 10,5 7,9 9,0 8,5 HFC-227ea 9 10,5 6,7 (7) - 7 9,0 7,0 (7) - 7,9 3220 0 FM 200

HFC-23 10 30 >30 16,3 16,4 16,3 HFC-23 30 >30 15,1 19,5 17 14800 0 FE-13

HFC-236a 11 10 15 8,8 9,8 9,3 HFC-236fa 10 15 (5) (5) (5) 9810 0 FE-36

IG01 12 43 52 41,9 51,0 48,4 IG-01 43(4) 52(4) 40,2 52,3 40,8 0 0 Argon(5)

IG55 14 43 52 40,3 47,5 45,1 IG-55 43(4) 52(4) 37,9 39,1 42,7 0 0 Argonite(5)

IG541 15 43 52 39,9 41,2 39,9 IG-541 43(4) 52(4) 34,2 40,6 38,5 0 0 Inergen(5)

IG100 13 43 52 40,3 43,7 41,5 IG-100 43(4) 52(4) 36,0 39 40,5 0 0 Nitrogen(5)

HFC Blend B 5 7,5 (5) (5) (5) 1540 0 Halotron I

FC-2-1-8(1) 3 30 >30 n.a 9,5 9,1 n.a. CEA-308

FC-3-1-10(1) 4 40 >40 6,5 7,7 7,4 n.a. CEA-410

HCFC-124(1) 7 1 2,5 n.a 8,7 8,3 HCFC-124 1 2,5 (5) (5) (5) 609 0,022 FE-24

Further Systems

CO2(2) ISO 6183 0,5 5 62 35 47 NFPA 12 50 35 CO2

Permanent

Inerting(3) VdS 3527 43 5213,1-14,0

14,6-15,6

14,9Permatec, Oxyreduct

(6) Design according new NFPA 2001, release date 14.10.2011(7) For companies having 5,2Vol% for Class A MEC(3) Selected Designs for Paper&Karton, IT, N-Heptan

(1) Withdrawn in ISO (4) Based on 12% Oxygen for NOAEL and 10% for LOAEL(5) According UL2166 and UL2127 testing for the system, refer to design manual of the producer(2) Selected Designs for Paper, Electrical Computer, and N Heptane

acc.ISO 6183, and Dry elctrical / Hexane acc. NFPA 12

Adressed agents in NFPA and ISO

Gaseous systems design background

Page 22: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 22

Synthetic Extinguishing Agents

Inert gases pure

IG-55

50% 50%

Argon Nitrogen

IG-541

40% 52%

Argon Nitrogen

8%

CO2

IG-01

100%

Argon

IG-100

100%

Nitrogen

HFC-227ea = FM 200

F

H

C

FK-5-1-12 = NovecTM 1230

C

F

O

Inert gases blended

Gaseous Extinguishing Agents most common used

Gaseous systems design

Page 23: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 23

NFPA 2001: 5.4.2.4* The minimum design concentration for a

Class A surface-fire hazard shall be determined by the greater of

the following:

(1) The extinguishing concentration, as determined in 5.4.2.2,

times a safety factor of 1.2

(2) Equal to the minimum extinguishing concentration for heptane

as determined from 5.4.2.1

NFPA 2001: 5.4.2.2* The flame extinguishing concentration for

Class A fuels shall be determined

by test as part of a listing program. As a minimum, the listing

program shall conform to UL 2127 or

UL 2166 or equivalent. The Class A fuels test on plastic sheets was

accomplished with Class A MEC for both agents.

HFC227ea:

Our Class B MEC: 6,9Vol%

Our Class A MEC: 5,4Vol% x1,2= 6,48Vol%

6,9 > 6,48Vol% so we use 7Vol% for class A surface-fire / Class A

fuels

FK-5-1-12:

Our Class B MEC: 4,5Vol%

Our Class A MEC: 3,3Vol% x1,2=4,0Vol%

4,5 > 4,0 Vol% so we use 4,5% for class A surface / Class A fuels

Minimum design concentration HFC-227ea / FK-5-1-12

Gaseous systems design background

ISO14520: 7.5.1.3 The extinguishing concentration for Class A

surface fires shall be the greater of the values determined

by the wood crib and polymeric sheet fire tests described in

Annex C. The minimum design concentration for

Class A fires shall be the extinguishing concentration increased by

a safety factor of 1,3. For non-cellulosic

Class A fuels, higher design concentrations may be required..

HFC227ea:

Class A MEC: 6,1Vol% x1,3=7,9Vol%

FK-5-1-12:

Class A MEC: 4,1Vol% x1,3=5,3Vol%

Page 24: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 24

NFPA 2001: 5.4.2.3 The minimum design concentration for a Class

B fuel hazard shall be

the extinguishing concentration, as determined in 5.4.2.1, times a

safety factor of 1.3.

HFC227ea:

Our Class B MEC: 6,9Vol% x 1,3 = 8,97Vol% = 9Vol%

Novec 1230:

Our Class B MEC: 4,5Vol% x 1,3 = 5,9Vol%

Minimum design concentration HFC-227ea / FK-5-1-12

Gaseous systems design background

ISO14520: 7.5.1.2 The minimum Class B design concentration for

each extinguishant shall be a demonstrated

extinguishing concentration for each Class B fuel plus a safety

factor of 1,3. The extinguishing concentration

used shall be that demonstrated by the cup burner test, carried

out in accordance with the method set out in

Annex B, that has been verified with the heptane pan tests

detailed in C.5.2. For hazards involving multiple

fuels, the value for the fuel requiring the greatest design

concentration shall be used. The extinguishing

concentration shall be taken as the cup burner value or the

heptane pan test value (see Annex C), whichever is greater.

HFC227ea:

Our Class B MEC: 6,9Vol% x 1,3 = 9Vol%

Novec 1230:

Our Class B MEC: 4,5Vol% x 1,3 = 5,9Vol%

Page 25: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 25

NFPA 2001: 5.4.2.5 The minimum design concentration for a Class

C hazard shall be the extinguishing concentration, as determined

in 5.4.2.2, times a safety factor of 1.35.

HFC227ea:

Class A MEC: 5,4 x 1,35 = 7,3 Vol%

Novec 1230:

Class A MEC 3,3 x 1,35 = 4,5Vol%

5.4.2.5.1 The minimum design concentration for spaces

containing energized electrical hazards supplied at greater than

480 volts that remain powered during and after discharge shall be

determined by testing, as necessary, and a hazard analysis.

Attention for certain electric risks !

For the reason using higher design concentrations please refer to

NFPA 2001 -2012 A.5.4.2.2 (Fire extinguishment tests for

(noncellulosic) Class A Surface Fires.)

Where any of the following conditions exists, higher extinguishing

concentrations might be required:

(1) Cable bundles greater than 4 in. (100 mm) in diameter

(2) Cable trays with a fill density greater than 20 percent of the

tray cross section

(3) Horizontal or vertical stacks of cable trays less than 10 in. (250

mm) apart

(4) Equipment energized during the extinguishment period where

the collective power consumption exceeds 5 kW.

Minimum design concentration HFC-227ea / FK-5-1-12

Gaseous systems design background

ISO14520 7.5.1.3: CAUTION — It is recognized that the wood crib

and .polymeric sheet Class A fire tests may not adequately

indicate extinguishing concentrations suitable for the protection

of certain plastic fuel hazards (e.g. electrical and electronic type

hazards involving grouped power or data cables such as

computer and control room under-floor voids, telecommunication

facilities, etc.). An extinguishing concentration not less than that

determined in accordance with 7.5.1.3, or not less than of that

determined from the heptane fire test described in C.6.2,

whichever is the greater, should be used under certain conditions.

These conditions may include:

1) cable bundles greater than in diameter;

2) cable trays with a fill density greater than of the tray cross-

section;

3) horizontal or vertical stacks of cable trays (closer than );

4) equipment energized during the extinguishment period where

the collective power consumption exceeds 5kW.

If polymeric sheet fire test data are not available, an extinguishing

concentration of that determined from the heptane fire test shall

be used.

HFC227ea:

Class B MEC: 6,1 x 1,3 = 9 Vol% * 0,95 = 8,5Vol%

Novec 1230:

Class B MEC: 4,5 x 1,3 = 5,9 Vol% * 0,95 = 5,6Vol%

Page 26: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 26

Required Minimum Design Concentration will give us a qty of 1000kg

95% in 10sec = 950kg = 95kg/s

Flooding time of 1000kg can be 1000kg / 95kg = 10,5sec !

Discharge time

Gaseous systems design background

NFPA 2001-2012 ISO14520

Page 27: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 27

Cylinder location

Gaseous systems design background

� Centralized room will meet all requirements listed in

NFPA & ISO

� Close as possible to all areas

� Do not place them in working areas

� Think about to ease the service effort

� The distance to the rooms will influence the no of

cylinders depending on the working pressure

Page 28: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 28

Structural needs

� Rooms protected by clean agents should be

sealed against their environment, to avoid

combustible gases from outside.

� This tightness ensures the 10min soak period.

� A tight room gives us a higher A/C efficiency

� If the room is sealed, it‘s integrity could be

damaged during flooding without pressure

venting.

� When using clean agents, damaging can be

avoided by controlled air and pressure flaps.

Gaseous systems design background

Page 29: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 29

Structural needs

Room Integrity in NFPA 2001 ISO14520

Gaseous systems design background

� Room Integrity Is a very important topic but attention is often low� But how shall we know if equivalent leakage area is sufficient� And shouldn’t we have a sealed room for safety and A/C efficiency� Cross sections for pressure venting should be provided by the hydraulic calculation

Page 30: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 30

Agent discharge

N2 discharge

Structural needs

Gaseous systems design background

Page 31: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 31

Structural needs

Gaseous systems design background

� Best solution to ensure room integrity and define pressure venting is a door fan test. See NFPA 2001 – 2012 Section C

� Please investigate weakest part of the hazard

� Rule of thumb:

� Glass Window 100Pa

� Normal door 300Pa

� Gipsum wall 500Pa

� Fire proof door double lock 500Pa

Review Room Integrity in NFPA 2001 and ISO14520

Page 32: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 32

Approval of Installation

Gaseous systems design background

NFPA 2001 ISO14520

Page 33: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 33

Inspection requirements

Gaseous systems design background

� The complete system should be checked annual by the installer or an authorized distributor. This test should include the control panel.

� The agent quty should be checked semi annual by wheight and pressure

� Hoses should be pressure tested all 5 years

� Refer to NFPA or ISO for complete guideline

NFPA 2001 ISO14520

Page 34: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 34

Inspection requirements

Gaseous systems design background

Page 35: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 35

Local application

Gaseous systems design background

NFPA 2001

� Consider local application where

hazard can be hardly inhibited by

the gas

� System shall have fixed pipe and

nozzles to distribute the agent into

the hazard

Page 36: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 36

Local application

Gaseous systems design background

OneU Active

� incl. smoke aspirating system� incl. 2 alarm tresholds� incl. emergency power supply (4

hours)� incl. suppression system with 3 kg

NovecTM 1230

Page 37: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 37

Local application

Gaseous systems design background

Page 38: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 38

Local application

Gaseous systems design background

All in One system

� Detection & Extinguishing

� Extinguishing only

� Nozzle in front

� Detection only

Page 39: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 39

Local application

Gaseous systems design background

� Cylinder filled with 4,27kg or 1,6kg

Novec 1230

� for Volumes 1,4-6,6m³

� Valve with electric or manual release

� Comes as complete set with control

panel, detectors, sounder and all

accessories.

Cabinet protection System the solution for small enclosures

Page 40: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 40

Inertgas - OXEO

IG-01, IG-100

IG-55, IG-541

CO2

High & Low

pressure

VSN1230 - total flooding

OneU - IT Rack protection

CPS1230 - Cabinet protection

utilizing

Novec™ 1230

VSN200 - total flooding

utilizing FM 200™

Gaseous systems design background

Page 41: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 41

Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!Eventuell noch ein erläuternder Schlusssatz

Gaseous systems applications

Page 42: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 42

Electric release unitPilot hose

Extinguishant hose

Pneumatic release unit

Extinguishant filling

according to hydraulic

calculation

Nitrogen

Dip tube

Valve

System principle

Gaseous systems application

Check Valve

Bleed valve

Limit switch

Page 43: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 43

System principle

� To protect the value of your system

for long term, Valves should close at

one bar to prevent moisture and

corrosion inside the cylinder

� We recommend refill only at

authorized fill station of the

manufacturer

� This will ensure proper handling

and replacements of necessary

parts according to manufacturers

guideline

� Ask for fill protocoll

Spring

Gaseous systems application

Page 44: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 44

Available working pressures for HFC-227ea / FK-5-1-12 with FM/UL

� 25 bar – 360psi, most common pressure,

� FK-5-1-12: Ansul, Chemetron, Janus, Kidde, Macron, Minimax, Sevo, Siemens, Tyco, Viking

� HFC-227ea: Ansul, Chemetron, Fike, Firetrace, Janus, Kidde, Macron, Minimax, Siemens, Tyco, Viking

� 34,5bar – 500psi, highest available pressure with welded cylinders,

� FK-5-1-12: Sevo, Firetrace, Janus

� 42 bar – 600psi, Common in europe

� FK-5-1-12: Minimax, Viking, Siemens (in UL process)

� HFC-227ea: Minimax, Viking, Siemens (in UL process)

� 50bar – 725psi, highest available working pressure

� FK-5-1-12: Minimax, Viking

� HFC-227ea: Minimax, Viking

Available working pressures

Gaseous systems application

Page 45: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 45

History of working pressures

� CO2 was always working with 60bar

� Inertgases are working also with 60bar after the pressure reducer or 30-40bar whenconstant flow valve is equipped.

� Halon 1301 has a vapor pressure of ca.200psi at 21°C in order to increase the capability 160psi nitrogen where added in the US giving 360psi(24,8bar), in Europe system where created with 42bar (610psi) in order to work on longer distances. (CO2 hardware was used)

� FM-200 has a vapor pressure of 4bar, the difference to Halon was substituted byNitrogen in the US, in Europe systems where created with 42bar (Halon hardware)

� Novec 1230 has a vapor pressure of 0,4bar, the difference to FM-200 was substitutedby Nitrogen. Also 42bar systems where created by using FM-200 42bar Hardware

� Due to the lazyness of Novec 1230 to leave the cylinder, having more pressure isadvantageous. Welded cylinders are now available with 500psi (34,5bar) what is themaximum for a welded cylinder according DOT seamless with 50bar (725psi).

Gaseous systems application

Page 46: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 46

Pressure for transportation

of agent in pipe

287%

213%

179%

100%

50bar / 725psi

42bar / 610psi

34,5bar / 500psi

25bar / 360psi

Avg. Loss after

opening of valve

Min. nozzle

pressure

Min. nozzle

pressure

Min.

nozzle

pressure

Min.

nozzle

pressure

Avg. Loss after

opening of valve

Avg. Loss after

opening of valve

Avg. Loss after

opening of valve

What is the advantage of higher working pressure

Gaseous systems application

Page 47: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 47

�The diameter gets smaller with higher working pressure,

� Or instead of two pipes one is enough

�Rooms that require a bigger agent mass than suitable for 4“ needs multiple systems !

What is the advantage of higher working pressure

Gaseous systems application

25bar 34,5bar 42bar 50bar ISO ANSI

17 21 25 30 DN15 1/2" Sch40

28 34 40 50 DN20 3/4" Sch40

42 51 60 75 DN25 1" Sch40

66 80 95 110 DN32 1 1/4" Sch40

100 120 140 200 DN40 1 1/2" Sch40

150 175 200 260 DN50 2" Sch40

250 275 300 400 DN65 2 1/2" Sch40

420 510 600 750 DN80 3" Sch40

630 765 900 1300 DN100 4" Sch40

delivered agent in kg in 10sec Pipe dimpipe class

Page 48: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 48

Pipe class according FSSA handbook

Gaseous systems application

�Schedule40 is sufficient for all working pressures up to 50bar = 725psi

Page 49: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 49

� Nitrogen is the propellant and will be flooded after the agent

� Example of Nitrogen amount:

� 1 cylinder 180l, 25bar, fill 186,3kg Novec 1230

� 186,3kg Novec 1230 = 115,3l Novec 1230 (dens. 1,616kg/l)

� 1 cylinder 32l, 25bar, fill 18,6kg Novec 1230

� 18,6kg Novec 1230 = 11,5l Novec 1230

� 180l - 115,3l Novec 1230 + 32l - 11,5l Novec = 85,2l Nitrogen x 25bar = 2130l expanded Nitrogen

� 1 cylinder: 180l, 50bar, fill 197,8kg + 4,6kg heel, Novec 1230

� 202,4kg Novec 1230 = 125,2l Novec 1230 (dens. 1,616kg/l)

� 180l minus 125,2l Novec = 54,8l Nitrogen x 42bar = 2301l expanded Nitrogen (50bar = 2740l)

� A higher working pressure acts with a similar amount of Nitrogen, itjust compress it to less volume.

� Nozzle pressure will be reduced by smaller pipes in case of higherworking pressure.

� Final nozzle pressures are at same level

25/34,5 bar

42/50 bar

Is the higher working pressure a threat for the room integrity

Gaseous systems application

Page 50: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 50

Example

Room 90m² - 3m+0,3m = 297m³- Design NFPA25bar requires:

180l + 32l cylinder

50bar requires:

180l cylinder

� High fill density in real life

� Smaller or less Cylinders = less space needed

Gaseous systems application

Page 51: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 51

76m3+40m³ - 95,8 kg filling,

80l cylinder 0-3 = 15m inlet pipe!

High fill density

Gaseous systems application

Page 52: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 52

Unbalanced piping, 3 levels on same pipework

Gaseous systems application

Page 53: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 53

15,6m / 24m

66m

Long distance or high rise pipe

Gaseous systems application

Page 54: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 54

� Agent quantity Halon: 0,3kg / m³ - Novec: 0,69kg / m³ (NFPA)

� 50bar can transport 3x times more agent through same diameter

� Utilizing existing pipes is possible !

� hydraulic calculation needed in advance

� Attention on falling T´s with Halon, these are not accpetable

� Attention with to big pipes for Halon masses

� See table of agent delivered in 10seconds

Substition of Halon 1301 or other HFC systems

Gaseous systems application

25bar 34,5bar 42bar 50bar ISO ANSI

17 21 25 30 DN15 1/2" Sch40

28 34 40 50 DN20 3/4" Sch40

42 51 60 75 DN25 1" Sch40

66 80 95 110 DN32 1 1/4" Sch40

100 120 140 200 DN40 1 1/2" Sch40

150 175 200 260 DN50 2" Sch40

250 275 300 400 DN65 2 1/2" Sch40

420 510 600 750 DN80 3" Sch40

630 765 900 1300 DN100 4" Sch40

delivered agent in kg in 10sec Pipe dimpipe class

Page 55: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 55

APPROVALS

Recommended approvals for hardware

� Why do we need a system approval ?

� All components have to show their reliability in long term tests

� The complete systems has to show its performance

� The performance must be predicted by a software

� The software is the most crucial part of a system.

� With FM/UL listings it is strictly linked with the system

� VdS Software is a kind of open source, always aks for VdS approval of the calculated system.

� Attention has to paid to the cylinders, here additional certificates are required, e.g. DOT, TPED,

� Offshore application often requires different approval than onshore

� Pay special attention to CE in Europe

Page 56: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 56

Single zone system

56

� See Installation and Service manual for more details

Gaseous systems application

Page 57: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 57

Gaseous systems application

Single zone system

57

� See Design manual for more details

Page 58: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 58

Gaseous systems application

Single zone system

58

� See Design manual for more details

Page 59: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 59

Gaseous systems application

Single zone system

59

� See Design manual for more details

Page 60: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 60

Flooding factors of HFC-227ea vs. FK-5-1-12

Required kg per hazard: Volume x kg/m³

Quantity calculation

Gaseous systems application

Overview

For more details refer to NFPA 2001 or ISO 14520

Design conc.

%

kg/m³ @15°C

kg/m³ @18°C

kg/m³ @20°C

kg/m³ @21°C

max. conc. @50°C from 15°C Design

NOAEL %

LOAEL %

Design conc.

%

kg/m³ @15°C

kg/m³ @18°C

kg/m³ @20°C

kg/m³ @21°C

max. conc. @50°C from 15°C Design

NOAEL %

LOAEL %

Class A - NFPA 2001 4,5 0,6683 0,6606 0,6556 0,6531 5,1 6,9 0,551 0,545 0,54 0,538 7,8

Class B - NFPA 2001 5,9 0,8893 0,8790 0,8723 0,8690 6,7 9 0,735 0,727 0,721 0,718 10,1

Class C - NFPA 2001 4,5 0,6683 0,6606 0,6556 0,6531 5,1 7,3 0,585 0,579 0,574 0,5720 8,2

Surface Class A - ISO14520 5,3 0,7938 0,7846 0,7787 0,7757 6,0 7,9 0,637 0,63 0,625 0,623 8,9

Class B - ISO14520 5,9 0,8893 0,8790 0,8723 0,8690 6,7 9 0,735 0,727 0,721 0,718 10,1

Higher Class A - ISO 14520 5,6 0,8414 0,8317 0,8253 0,8222 6,4 8,5 0,69 0,682 0,677 0,675 9,6

HFC-227ea / FM200FK-5-1-12 / Novec 1230

9 10,510 >10

Page 61: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 61

Gaseous systems application

Software

61

Page 62: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 62

Gaseous systems application

Software

62

Page 63: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 63

Gaseous systems application

Software

63

Page 64: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 64

Gaseous systems application

Software

64

Page 65: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 65

System components Multizone

65

� See Installation and Service manual for more details

Gaseous systems application

Page 66: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 66

Principle

� Centralized agent storage

� Hazards are served via valves

� In case of alarm the corresponding valve will open and release the agent to the area

� Wich kind of systems you know working like that ?

� Sprinkler

� Foam

� Gas

Gaseous systems application

Page 67: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 67

Main characteristics

� Single zone: The agent quantity is calculated to flood the protected zone one time, with reserve two times

� Independent from other rooms

� More rooms = linear increase of investment

� Space cosuming

� Multizone: The agent quantity is calculated for the biggest of several volumes, the necessary quantity is released in case of alarm and flooded via a selectional valve into the area, a 100% reserve is often used.

� First come first serve

� Limited investment in agent and cylinders

� Occupies only small space

Gaseous systems application

Page 68: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 68

� Minimax&Viking approved as first and so faronly company a multizone system utilizingNovec 1230 according FM/UL approvalguidelines.

� This contains, cylinder and all hardware forsingle zone systems

� Selectorvalves and related componentes

� Software to calculate selectorvalve manifold.

� Up 15 rooms can be connected to onecylinder bank.

Gaseous systems application

Watch Video

Page 69: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 69

Gaseous systems application

Software

69

Page 70: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 70

Gaseous systems application

Software

70

Page 71: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 71

Gaseous systems application

Software

71

� See Design manual for more details

Page 72: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 72

Gaseous systems application

Software

72

Page 73: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 73

Gaseous systems application

Software

73

Page 74: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 74

Golden rules multizone

� Minimum room agent requirement per room should be 150kg to be connected to Multizone system, otherwise single system is more economic

Gaseous systems application

� Saving: 1 cylinder with accessories and agent

� Additional: 1 Selector valve with accessories

Page 75: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 75

Golden rules multizone

� Ideal relation of rooms connected to one system is 4:1

� The background is a limit of the hydraulic calculation called “agent in pipe”

� This shall be not more than f.e. 85% (our software)

� If first pipes are to big (necessary for bigger areas) nitrogen will go ahead of agent and agent supply will be not sufficient to build up concentration

� Pressure drops to much in Selector valve manifold

� Example:

� Biggest room requires 1000kg, and therefore manifold and selector valve manifold is 4”

� Smallest requires 150kg, this will be flooded into 4” manifolds

� If rooms vary more than 4:1 we may consider one system for big rooms and one for small rooms.

Gaseous systems application

1000kg

150kg

Nitrogen

Page 76: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 76

Golden rules multizone

� Maximum agent for biggest hazard ca. 1300kg, if bigger rooms need to be protected consider either slave battery or separate system

Gaseous systems application

Page 77: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 77

Examples for savings

Single systems: 21cylinder – 2632kg

Multizone with reserve: 6 + 6cylinders = 12 cylinders 748kg+748kg = 1496kg

Gaseous systems application

Page 78: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 78

Examples for savings

35 Cylinders & 3,5to Novec saved, -32% against single zone. Max. Distance 49m

Gaseous systems application

Page 79: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 79

Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!Eventuell noch ein erläuternder Schlusssatz

Case study 13,8kV substation

Page 80: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 80

Novec 1230 – 4,5% @ 21°C – sealevel – 2 Equipment rooms available

Case study 13,8kV substation

Page 81: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 81

List of rooms

� We decided to use only one Fire Equipment room

� Distance to rooms was very different

� Rooms are in BF and GF

Case study 13,8kV substation

1.aBF Cable Distribution

Room left1450,00 950,7 1 22 -5

1.bBF Cable Distribution

Room right1455,38 954,2 1 38 -5

2GF 13.8kV Switchgear

Room1371,59 899,3 1 20 0

3 GF Battery Room 257,38 168,8 1 40 0

4GF Communication

Room201,36 132,1 3 5 0

5 GF Control Room 1425,84 934,8 3 16 0

Agent Required w/o reserve 4039,9

Sr. No. Protected RoomsRoom

Volume m3

Agent Qty

in kg

Enclo

sures

Dist.

Incl.

Elbow

Elevat

ion

Page 82: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 82

Cylinder bank

� Space requirement

� Single row = No. of cylinders x 0,5

� Example 13,8kV Swgr = 7 x 0,5

� Double row = (No. of cylinders x 0,5) + 0,25

Case study 13,8kV substation

Dm

406mm

500mm

Dm

406mm

250mmDm

406mm

500mm

Manifold

Manifold

450mm

900mm

Page 83: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 83

1.aBF Cable Distribution

Room left1450,00 950,7 1 22 -5 22 180l 86,5 9

1.bBF Cable Distribution

Room right1455,38 954,2 1 38 -5 28 180l 72 9,5

2GF 13.8kV Switchgear

Room1371,59 899,3 1 20 0 28 180l 72 9,5

3 GF Battery Room 257,38 168,8 1 40 0 4 106l 84,5 9,5

4GF Communication

Room201,36 132,1 3 5 0 4 106l 76 9,5

5 GF Control Room 1425,84 934,8 3 16 0 26 180l 72 10

Agent Required w/o reserve 4039,9 112

Fill in

kg

sec.

25bar

8449

Single Zone 25bar

Cyl. Qty.

SZ 25bar

Size Cyl.

SZ 25bar

Sr. No. Protected RoomsRoom

Volume m3

Agent Qty

in kg

Enclo

sures

Dist.

Incl.

Elbow

Elevat

ion

Situation with 25bar – max. 180l cylinder size

Case study 13,8kV substation

� Higher agent amount is caused by over flooding to eliminate pipe fill error and minimum fill of cylinder

Page 84: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 84

Situation with 25bar – max. 180l cylinder size

� Situation in Equipment room 1

Case study 13,8kV substation

Control room

Communication room13,8kV Swgr room

Cable basement right

Cable basement left

Page 85: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 85

Situation with 25bar – max. 180l cylinder size

� 25bar system: 112 cylinder

� Due to distance of battery room or communication room both rooms are needed.

� Fire Equipment room 2 would be to small for all cylinders

� The 4 cylinders for battery room has to be placed in Fire Equipment room 2

Case study 13,8kV substation

Page 86: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 86

1.aBF Cable Distribution

Room left1450,00 950,7 1 22 -5 12 180l 162,5 9

1.bBF Cable Distribution

Room right1455,38 954,2 1 38 -5 14 180l 138,5 9

2GF 13.8kV Switchgear

Room1371,59 899,3 1 20 0 12 180l 154,5 9

3 GF Battery Room 257,38 168,8 1 40 0 4 140l 89,0 9

4GF Communication

Room201,36 132,1 3 5 0 2 140l 136,5 9

5 GF Control Room 1425,84 934,8 3 16 0 12 180l 160,5 9

Agent Required w/o reserve 4039,9 56

Single Zone 50bar

Size

Cyl. SZ

Fill in

kg

sec.

50bar

8298

Cyl. Qty.

SZ 50bar

Sr. No. Protected RoomsRoom

Volume m3

Agent Qty

in kg

Enclo

sures

Dist.

Incl.

Elbow

Elevat

ion

Situation with 50bar – max. 180l cylinder size

� Higher agent amount is caused by residual agent in seamless cylinders and by over flooding to eliminate pipe fill error

Case study 13,8kV substation

Page 87: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 87

Situation with 50bar – max. 180l cylinder size

� Situation in Equipment room 1

Case study 13,8kV substation

Control room

Battery room

Communication room13,8kV Swgr room

Cable basement right

Cable basement left

Page 88: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 88

Situation with 50bar – max. 180l cylinder size

� 50bar single zone system: 56 cylinders

� Only one room is required, Fire equipment room 1 can accommodate all cylinders

� Room size could be reduced by ca.1/4rd

� Fire Equipment room 2 can be used for other purpose

� Saved space: 60m²

Case study 13,8kV substation

Page 89: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 89

Situation with 50bar Multizone – max. 180l cylinder size

� Battery room needs to be overflooded to eliminate pipefill error but is still below 10%

� This is the big adavantage of Novec 1230 in Design

Case study 13,8kV substation

1.aBF Cable Distribution

Room left1450,00 950,7 1 22 -5 - - - 12 162,5 9

1.bBF Cable Distribution

Room right1455,38 954,2 1 38 -5 1 4" 20 0 100,5 9

2GF 13.8kV Switchgear

Room1371,59 899,3 1 20 0 1 4" 20 0 100,5 9

3 GF Battery Room 257,38 168,8 1 40 0 1 2 1/2" 8 0 100,5 12

4GF Communication

Room201,36 132,1 3 5 0 1 2" 6 0 100,5 9

5 GF Control Room 1425,84 934,8 3 16 0 1 4" 20 0 100,5 9

Agent Required w/o reserve 4039,9 5 20 12 3960

Multizone 50bar

Dim. Of

valves

Cyl. MZ

M/R

Slave cyl.

MZ M/R

Fill in

kg

sec.

50bar

No of

valves

Sr. No. Protected RoomsRoom

Volume m3

Agent Qty

in kg

Enclo

sures

Dist.

Incl.

Elbow

Elevat

ion

Page 90: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 90

Situation with 50bar Multizone – max. 180l cylinder size

� 50bar multi zone system: 32 cylinders plus 5 valves

� Only one room is required, Fire equipment room 1 can accommodate all cylinders

� Room can be less than half the size

� Saved space: 80m²

Case study 13,8kV substation

Page 91: Gaseous systems application

© Viking Page 91

� All systems have a common principle

� Different working pressures available

� Higher working pressure provides more flexibility

� Higher working pressure is no threat to room integrity

� Higher working pressure saves space and hardware

� Working with Multizone saves cost

� If applying Multizone it is crucial that the software calculates the selector valve manifold

� For Halon substitution more pressure is necessary

Summary

Page 92: Gaseous systems application

Vielen Dank für Eure Aufmerksamkeit!

Большое спасибо за Ваше внимание !

Tack för din uppmärksamhet

�را ھ�����مThanks for your attention !

Kiitos huomita

Gracias por su atención

Takk for oppmerksomheten

Merci pour votre attention

Grazie per l‘attenzione

Dankon pro via atento

Peter Eisenberger

+43 664/836 66 56

[email protected]