ch10 gaseous agent extinguishing systems
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 10Gaseous Agent Extinguishing Systems
Objectives • Describe the physical characteristics of
carbon dioxide. • Describe the four application methods for
delivery of carbon dioxide.• Describe the physical characteristics of
halogenated hydrocarbons (halons).
Objectives
• Explain the halon numbering identification system.
• Describe the physical characteristics of halocarbons and inert gases (clean agents).
• Discuss the two categories of clean agents.
Objectives • Explain the difference between the two
types of aerosol generators. • Discuss the various acceptance and
periodic inspections and tests that are required to certify and maintain gaseous agent extinguishing systems.
Introduction • New materials, machines, processes, and
technologies created a need for alternatives to water for extinguishing.
• Gaseous extinguishing systems are effective in many situations where water is not.– Carbon dioxide– Halogenated hydrocarbons– Halocarbons and inert gas
Carbon Dioxide • An odorless, colorless, noncombustible gas
– Exists in the air at 380 parts per million– Can exist as gas, solid, or liquid
• Liquid state best for suppression– Effective on Class A, B, and C type fires
• Displaces and reduces the level of oxygen below the 15% of air content that is necessary to sustain combustion
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• Engineered systems that protect processes, equipment, items of value/importance
• Self-contained system using fixed nozzles, manual reels, or both to deliver agent
• Equipment requires listing or approval.
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• When discharged pressurized CO2 expands to gas vapor state:– Combines with moisture in air and forms a
cloud that consumes hazard• Helpful when another agent could be
problematic or there are physical obstructions
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• A few types of systems and methods exist.– Chosen based on hazard size and amount of
agent needed• Many different nozzles are available to
provide the correct discharge velocity, flow rate, and discharge pattern.
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• Discharge nozzles– Must be able to
withstand fire’s heat and discharge pressure of CO2
– Require blow-off caps or frangible discs to manage clogging
– Require listing or approval © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• Activation– Automatically with a detector OR manually by
a person– Warning signs must be posted about dangers
and give emergency instruction.• Guidance on performing the evaluation,
design, and installation of this type of system is in NFPA 12.
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• Low- and high-pressure storage– Low pressure stores CO2 at 300 psi; high
pressure at 850 psi.• Both systems dispel gas without additional
propellant.• System type is chosen based on hazard and amount
of CO2 needed.
– Low-pressure systems may need refrigeration/heating equipment to maintain CO2
at 0ºF.
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• Low- and high-pressure storage (cont’d)– Low-pressure systems
may use one large pressure container.
– High-pressure systems can use multiple small cylinders connected to a manifold.
Cou
rtesy
of A
mer
ican
Fire
Tec
hnol
ogie
s
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
• Delivery systems– Local application systems protect a specific area, piece
of equipment, process, or operation.– Total flooding systems protect enclosed hazards,
rooms, and areas, filling enclosure with gas.– Hand hose line system is manual system where
individual accesses hose, reel, and nozzle connected to fixed pipe CO2 supply.
– Standpipe/mobile supply is a fixed local, total, or hand hose system with no permanent CO2 supply.
Halogenated Agents • A mixture of carbon and one or more of fluorine,
chlorine, bromine, and iodine– Numbering system lists number of atoms of each element
in the agent.– Halon 1211 and 1301 are used for fire protection.
• Halon agents break down the reaction sequence of fire. – Disrupting the uninhibited combustion reaction that is the
basis of the fire tetrahedron– Effective for Class B and C type fires, and Class A to a
degree
Halogenated Agents • Human exposure is okay, unless high level
or long duration.– Most systems have 4% to 7% concentration.
• 10% or higher is dangerous to humans.– Fire personnel should wear SCBA and take
readings in discharge areas.• Decomposition produces dangerous by-products.
Halon Extinguishing Systems • Can be pre-engineered or engineered and
use many components• All equipment and components require
listing and approval.
Halon Extinguishing Systems • Automatic detection and activation and
manual control are usually required.• Must also have emergency release by
manual operation and audible, visual, and olfactory warning devices
• When activated, control head operates and valve head opens to release gas to cylinders, flood piping, and reach nozzles
Halon Extinguishing Systems • If manual abort switch
is installed, must be in hazard area.
• Substantial discharge must occur in 10 seconds.– Time delay allowed for
personnel to evacuate– Warning signs
required © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Halon Extinguishing Systems • Nozzle placement is critical to uniform delivery.
– Pressurized nitrogen can be added.• Halon changes from liquid to vapor as it flows.
– Discharges as cloud; when cloud dissipates, gas remains
• Once the hazard evaluation is done, there are engineering considerations.– Size and number of cylinders and size of pipe– Nozzle and valve types
Halon Extinguishing Systems • NFPA 12A gives guidance on evaluation,
design, and installation of this type of system.– Referenced by NFPA 5000 and IBC
• NFPA 12B (Halon 1211) was discontinued.– NFPA 12A may also become obsolete.
Halon Extinguishing Systems • Halon delivery systems
– Local application systems protect specific area.
• Discharge directly onto hazard– Total flooding systems protect
enclosed hazards by filling them with halon.
• Concentration level: 5–15% by volume
– Halon 1301 is usually the only agent used for these systems.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Clean Agents • Clean agents were developed to replace
Halon 1301.– Effective on Class A, B, and C fires– Protect many high-value locations and items– Should not be used with reactive materials,
materials with own oxygen supply, certain peroxides and hydrazine
Clean Agents • Human exposure ok, unless high level or
long duration• Clean agents fall into two categories:
• Halogen-based agents interrupt the fire’s chain reaction and remove heat from reaction zone of flame.
• Inert agents reduce oxygen level in protected area.
Clean Agent Extinguishing Systems
• Pre-engineered or engineered self-contained systems that use a number of different components
• All equipment and components require listing and approval.– Specific to application
Clean Agent Extinguishing Systems
• Automatic detection and activation and manual control usually required
• Must also have emergency release by manual operation and audible, visual, and olfactory warning devices
• If manual abort switch installed, must be in hazard area
Clean Agent Extinguishing Systems
• When activated, control head operates and valve head opens to release gas to cylinders, flood piping, and reach nozzles.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
© A
. Mau
rice
Jone
s, J
r./Jo
nes
& B
artle
tt Le
arni
ng
Clean Agent Extinguishing Systems
• Substantial discharge must occur in 10 seconds for halocarbons and 60 seconds for inert agents.
• Warning signs with emergency information must be posted.
Clean Agent Extinguishing Systems
• Nozzle placement is critical to uniform delivery.– Clean agents can flood an area
and reach difficult places. • Once the hazard evaluation is
done, there are engineering considerations.– Size and number of cylinders– Pipe size
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Clean Agent Extinguishing Systems
• NFPA 2001 gives guidance on evaluation, design, and installation of this type of system.– Referenced by NFPA 5000 and IBC
• Additional standards:– UL 2127– UL 2166– ISO 14520-1
Aerosol • A chemical fire extinguishing agent
– Begins as a potassium-based compound– Undergoes internal combustion process and
becomes ultra-fine spray• Similar to halon and clean agents—interrupts
fire chain– Once discharged, remains in environment long
enough to prevent reignition– Best for Class B and C fires, but can be used for all
Aerosol Fire Extinguishing Systems
• Alternative to clean agent and specialized water-based systems– Good for closed spaces and areas appropriate
for total flooding– Per NFPA 2010, not well suited for:
• Deep-seated fires• Chemicals subject to rapid oxidation• Reactive metals• Chemicals that undergo autothermal decomposition
Aerosol Fire Extinguishing Systems
• Condensed generators– Used in systems made up of self-contained canisters in
the hazard area– When activated, an actuator in the generators starts a
chemical reaction.• Dispersed generators
– Already contain the chemical agent– Keep it pressurized by suspension in inert gas or
halocarbon– When activated, pipes and nozzles distribute aerosol.
Approval and Periodic Inspection, Testing, and
Maintenance • Carbon dioxide
– After installation NFPA requires visual, operational, and discharge inspections and tests.
– Once operational, monthly visual inspections to assess hazard changes, equipment damage, leaks
– Weekly inspection of gauges on low-pressure systems to ensure no decrease in liquid level
– Semi-annual inspection of high-pressure system tanks to ensure no leakage
Approval and Periodic Inspection, Testing, and
Maintenance • Carbon dioxide (cont’d)
– Annual actuation test of electronic components for both low- and high-pressure systems
– Hose systems inspected and pressure checked every 5 years
– When system discharges, tanks require hydrostatic testing before refilling.
– If unused for 12 years, discharge and hydrostatic testing are required.
Approval and Periodic Inspection, Testing, and
Maintenance • Halon
– When new Halon 1301 system is installed, mechanical, electrical, enclosure, and functional testing and inspection are mandatory.
– Once operational, monthly visual inspections to assess hazard changes, equipment damage, leaks
– Semi-annual pressure checks to ensure pressure not lost
Approval and Periodic Inspection, Testing, and
Maintenance • Halon (cont’d)
– Annual actuation test to ensure detection, alarm, and control devices are operational
– Annual inspection and pressure testing every 5 years for hose systems
Approval and Periodic Inspection, Testing, and
Maintenance • Clean agents
– Upon installation, same procedures as halon systems
– Once operational, annual visual inspections– Semi-annual pressure loss checks– Annual actuation test– Annual inspection and pressure testing every
5 years for hose systems
Approval and Periodic Inspection, Testing, and
Maintenance • Aerosol
– Like other systems, acceptance inspection and testing and periodic testing are mandatory.
– 30-day visual inspection and semi-annual weighing
– Enclosure and system components checked– System tested as specified by manufacturer
Summary• Alternative extinguishing agents are needed
to deal with fires where the use of water could make the situation worse or damage extremely valuable or irreplaceable property and equipment. Gas-based extinguishing agents—in particular, carbon dioxide, halons, halocarbons, and inert gases—offer viable, effective alternatives in many environments and applications.
Summary• Gaseous systems are self-contained
engineered or pre-engineered that use similar components, including nozzles; piping; containers; control panels; detection, activation, and alarm devices; control valves; and releasing mechanisms.
• Gases work well on Class A, B, and C type fires, but not fires involving reactive metals, materials containing their own oxygen supply, or metal hydrides.
Summary• Gaseous system design requires
extensive evaluation of the hazard to ensure the right agent is used and concentration level is adequate.
• The main application methods are local application and total flooding.
Summary• When discharged, carbon dioxide
displaces the oxygen in a protected area. If a person fails to leave the area, asphyxiation is probable.
Summary• Due to environmental concerns, toxicity
concerns, and the requirements of the Montreal Protocol, halon agents are no longer manufactured and the continued phase-out makes the agents difficult to obtain and systems nearly obsolete.
Summary• Clean agents work well as halon substitutes,
but none can directly replace halons; exposure during a fire subjects the individual to higher levels of dangerous decomposition by-products than with halon.
• To ensure performance and reliability, all gas-based fire suppression systems require acceptance inspection and testing, and periodic inspection, testing, and maintenance.